Central Council www.centralbedfordshire.gov.uk

Site Assessment

Technical Document

Appendix D: Preliminary Site Assessment Results July 2017

1.1.11 - 1 -

ii

Appendix D: Preliminary assessment results ALP441 Way Eliot off Land ALP439 ALP279 II Phase Farm Warren NLP412 NLP387 NLP197 NLP194 NLP105 Lane House Gas of Land NLP088 Road Station off Land NLP048 3 site Grange Ampthill NLP045 2 site Grange Ampthill NLP044 1 site Grange Ampthill NLP043 ALP477 Ampthill ALP379 House Houghton at Land ALP356 Doolittle at Land ALP346 Farm Warren of Extension ALP343 Lane Rectory off Land ALP285 Farm Stud Grange ALP251

ID of east south Land Row 44 London of rear and at Land Ampthill Site Ride and Park Lane Hazelwood of east Land Ampthill Farm, Park Little at Land Road of west Land (A507) Road Woburn off Land Grange Ampthill to adjacent Land

Site Name Ampthill Ampthill Ampthill Ampthill Ampthill Ampthill Ampthill Ampthill Ampthill Ampthill Ampthill Ampthill Ampthill Arlesey Arlesey Arlesey Ampthill Ampthill

Parish Arlesey Fairfield Arlesey Ampthill Standalone Ampthill Ampthill Ampthill Ampthill Ampthill Ampthill Ampthill Ampthill Ampthill Ampthill Ampthill Ampthill Ampthill Ampthill Ampthill

Nearest Settlement Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Not Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Not Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Belt Green Not Belt Green

Green Belt 0.35 1.99 0.35 8.24 3.57 5.06 2.09 6.79 09 NLP251 30.99 17.72 0.60 4.46 16.55 4.89 3.09 1.68 0.30 3.26 1.87 0.58 Site Size (ha) ALP343 N/A NLP045 NLP044 NLP043 NLP105 NLP044 NLP043 NLP105 NLP044 NLP105 NLP044 NLP412

Overlapping Submissions oa Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site N/A process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site

Outcome osdrdta aigfradol oto ftest ol drs hsissue. this address not would is site It the Fairfield. of and portion Arlesey a between only coalescence forward cause taking would that Site considered 1B. Stage at fails Site circumstances. exceptional for Green considered wider be the to to criteria contribution identified fulfil no been not or not does weak has it weak, and this relatively Belt this to a Green address addition only the would In making in site Belt. is located the that is of parcel site portion and a The a Ampthill as 1E. only between Stage forward Belt at taking Green fails that in issue.Site considered coalescence not cause is would It Site Flitwick. 1B. Stage at fails a Site of uses. not employment is proposes and Site settlements assessed. existing not any Site to related alone. well settlement. stand not from to is detached scale Site and sufficient 1B. Ampthill Stage to at related fails poorly Site is this Site address 1B. would Stage site at the fails of Site portion and a Ampthill only between forward Belt taking Green that in issue. considered coalescence not cause is would more. It Site or Flitwick. 1B. dwellings Stage ten at accommodate fails circumstances. not Site exceptional would for Belt. Site considered Green 1A. a be wider Stage as to the identified at criteria to been fails fulfil contribution not Site not no has does or and it weak Belt this weak, Green to relatively the addition a in In only located this making is address is site would that The site parcel 1E. the Stage of at portion and fails a Ampthill Site only between forward Belt taking Green that in issue. considered coalescence issue. not cause this is would address It Site would considered Flitwick. 1B. site not Stage the is Site at of It settlement. fails portion Flitwick. from Site a and detached only Ampthill and forward between Ampthill taking Belt to that Green related this in poorly address coalescence is would cause Site site would 1B. the Stage of at portion fails and a Ampthill Site only between forward Belt taking Green that in issue. considered coalescence settlement. not cause from is would detached It Site and Flitwick. 1B. Ampthill Stage to at related circumstances. fails poorly exceptional Site is for Belt. Site considered Green 1B. a be wider Stage as to the identified at criteria to been fails fulfil contribution not Site not no has does or and it weak Belt this weak, Green to relatively the addition a a in In of only located not making is is is site and that The settlements parcel 1E. existing Stage any at to fails related Site alone. well surrounding stand not the to is Ampthill, scale Site of sufficient 1B. barrier. part Stage a residential at as the fails act to Site A507 related this the poorly address and is would uses Site site employment 1B. the Stage of at portion fails and a Ampthill Site only between forward Belt taking Green that in issue. considered coalescence settlement. not cause from is would detached It Site and Flitwick. 1B. Ampthill Stage to at related fails poorly Site is this Site address 1B. would Stage site at the fails of Site portion and a Ampthill only between forward Belt taking Green that in issue. considered coalescence not cause is would It Site Flitwick. 1B. Stage at fails Site

Justification NLP463 NLP168 Road off Land NLP090 NLP089 Dell Dingley at Land NLP062 Woodcote at Land ALP417 Court Earls ALP040 Farm Chase at Land NLP451 NLP419 NLP403 NLP326 NLP318 NLP251 NLP223 NLP093

ID Area Opportunity East South Keynes Triangle/Milton Guise Aspley View, Meadow off Land Pleasant Mount 23 and 13 between Land Arlesey of East the to Land Arlesey Lane, Lewis off Land Rd of North the to Land Street High 214-216 of rear to Land Arlesey of east south Land Lane Lewis adjoining Land Arlesey High Street, of west the to Land

Site Name slyGieApe us re Belt Green Guise Aspley Belt Green Guise Aspley Guise Aspley Belt Green Guise Aspley Guise Aspley Guise Belt Aspley Green Sands Woburn Belt Green Guise Aspley Guise Aspley Guise Aspley Arlesey Arlesey Arlesey Arlesey Arlesey Arlesey Arlesey Arlesey slyGieStandalone Guise Aspley Belt Green Guise Aspley Guise Aspley

Parish Arlesey Arlesey Arlesey Arlesey Arlesey Arlesey Arlesey Arlesey

Nearest Settlement Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not

Green Belt 9.0NLP251 296.00 2.81 8.05 0.61 ALP441 59.00 2.81 1.22 5.6N/A 259.86 2.03 5.21 0.59 0.64 0.63 3.61 50.81 Site Size (ha) NLP223 NLP403

Overlapping Submissions oa Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site

Outcome rnpr nrsrcuet aeacneto oteeitn 41 hscudpotentially could this A421, strategic existing the the for to available connection corridor a narrow make the could been to to that has infrastructure due Expressway route transport site, Cambridge a the to until through Oxford proceed cross proposed not potentially the should for site safeguarded this and within identified development villages. that neighbouring physical considered and appropriate is development provide It the to between required on separation be impacts visual would negative and settlement limit these new would upon Any that impacts settlements. buffers mitigate development. existing landscape to standalone appropriate need a is and would providing it landscapes site of however distinctive this capable Guise within is Aspley development site to scale the extension south. Strategic of logical the size a to the form Ridge of that not Greensand west considered would the Vale south site of Clay the this landscape Aspley to within distinctive the lies Development the within and by predominately Sands contained farmland Woburn circumstances. is arable Guise, exceptional and of Aspley for Belt. consists of considered Green site a north be wider The as the to the . identified to criteria to been situated fulfil contribution not is not no has site does or and The it weak Belt this weak, Green to relatively the circumstances. addition a in exceptional In only located for Belt. making is considered Green is a site be wider that as The to the parcel identified 1E. criteria to been Stage fulfil contribution not at not no has fails does or and Site it weak Belt this weak, Green to relatively the circumstances. addition a in exceptional In only located for Belt. making is considered Green is a site be wider that as The to the parcel identified 1E. criteria to been Stage fulfil contribution not at not no has fails does or and Site it weak Belt this weak, Green to relatively the circumstances. addition a in exceptional In only located for Belt. making is considered Green is a site be wider that as The to the parcel identified 1E. criteria to been Stage fulfil contribution not at not no has fails does or and Site it weak Belt this weak, Green to relatively the circumstances. addition a in exceptional In only located for Belt. making is considered Green is a site be wider that as The to the parcel identified 1E. criteria to been Stage fulfil contribution not at not no has fails does or and Site it weak Belt this weak, Green to relatively the circumstances. addition a in exceptional In only located for Belt. making is considered Green is a site be wider that as The to the parcel identified 1E. criteria to been Stage fulfil contribution not at not no has fails does or and Site it weak Belt this weak, Green to relatively the addition a in In only located Core making is North is site adopted that The the parcel 1E. in Stage housing at for fails allocated Site already is MA8) site (Policy This Strategy 1D. Stage at fails Site aspirations. GI with character conflicts wetland and important habitat an Brook to has Pix due site by terms as separated ecology terms Arlesey, in landscape with following and in relationship The unacceptable poor balance. be a planning would has using and Site consideration identified: overall been an have on issues based 2 Stage at Fail Core North adopted the in housing for allocated already is MA8) site (Policy This Strategy 1D. Stage at fails Site

Justification ALP418 ALP406 ALP252 Orchard Top ALP082 Road ALP044

ID Road Bedford of Road/east Higham of north Land Barton-le-Clay of east the to Land Road Manor at Land

Site Name atnl lyBro eCa re Belt Clay Green le Barton Clay le Barton Belt Green Clay le Barton Clay le Barton Clay le Barton atnl lyBro eCa re Belt Green Clay le Barton Clay le Barton Belt Green Clay le Barton Clay le Barton

Parish atnl Clay le Barton

Nearest Settlement re Belt Green

Green Belt 72.39 125.01 0.52 0.45 8.22 Site Size (ha) NLP388 NLP382, NLP396 NLP158,

Overlapping Submissions ato h oa Plan. Local the of part as further considered will be site the of portion A process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site

Outcome hrce n perneo atnL-lywihicue h atr fdevelopment the of to pattern harm the cause includes would that which Barton-Le-Clay considered Barton-Le-Clay to is of extension It Appearance an unbalanced. and as and Character site jarring entire appearing countryside the settlement open of the the appear development of into would centre development site the projecting entire from Barton-Le-Clay, the away to of extension development illogical that an considered harm. as is such of it outweigh benefit above, would public the homes that Notwithstanding of considered number is significant it separations, a design, appropriate Moated providing quality through the high mitigation as and to known landscaping subject Monument heritage screening/soft however Ancient designated Farm, Scheduled the Faldo the to at and harm of site Manor substantial setting Westhey than landscape as less wider known cause the asset would within site is the site of the Development that Moated Listed considered as II AONB. also known Grade Chilterns is Monument the the It Ancient of Farm. Scheduled setting Faldo the the at and within site Manor is landowner Westhey site the as The of known land. agreement Building agricultural the predominantly without is forward site put The deliverable. been not has therefore site is the and 1D, Stage at fails Site circumstances. exceptional for Belt. considered Green a be wider as to the identified criteria to been fulfil contribution not not no has does or and it weak Belt this weak, Green to relatively the addition a in In only located AONB. making is Chilterns is site the that The by parcel 1E. covered Stage more at or fails 50% Site is Site 1A. Stage the at of fails development Site Expressway, for planned consideration the further public delayed. to of the be due worthy by may that is outweighed site noted site is is the area it Therefore the However, provide. to development. can harm site the the above, that mentioned benefits comments the of South. and light Pit Heat In Rookery Combined at the constructed with be associated to Network energy is Heat planned that the nearby Facility to to Power connected connections be for could location, and the facility given possibilities, and also creation are habitat There for to opportunities deliver Milton provide could and facilities. also site Bedford leisure and this the benefits within for public development route significant that planned provide Waterway, the and of Park section Waterway significant harm. Keynes a such substantial contains outweigh than also likely less of site would be impact The development would likely of assets the benefits heritage that the these considered and of is separation significance it the the assets considering the upon heritage when within development these However, 1 lies and west. Grade site site south Abbey The the the Woburn Station. between to the Railway Garden and Guise and Monument Aspley particularly Park Scheduled the considered, Registered Ringwork of be Brogborough south to the the need of to will Husborne setting lies these and that on Guise area setting Aspley the the nearby in on within impacts buildings therefore listed currently and of those Crawley number motorway. to significant M1 addition a the in are and pollution Aspley There A421 noise and the and Sands from air Woburn experienced of within being sources crossings settlements new level surrounding creating the the alongside at within Guise, particularly felt development of networks, be from number road may arise a minor implications could are and traffic that there Further implications where location. queuing A421 this and the within traffic from to accessible regard directly in and concerns to adjacent is and site Keynes The Rail). Milton transport (East-West both for Station to scheme Train connections comprehensive transport a public require improved would including site period. improvements this plan of the development within scale development Strategic the of deliverability the affect

Justification NLP382 NLP301 NLP255 NLP158 Rd at Land NLP123 NLP114 4x4 Pit Devils ALP454

ID Extension Northern Barton-le-Clay Farm Faldo Clay le Barton Farm, Grange at Land Clay Barton le of East the to Land Clay le Barton Road, Hexton 53-57

Site Name atnl Clay le Barton Clay le Barton Belt Green Clay le Barton Clay le Barton Belt Green Clay le Barton Clay le Barton Belt Green Clay le Barton Clay le Barton Belt Green Clay le Barton Clay le Barton atnl lyBro eCa re Belt Green Clay le Barton Clay le Barton

Parish atnl Clay le Barton Clay le Barton

Nearest Settlement re Belt Green Belt Green

Green Belt 0.75 11.57 69.44 2.41 12.28 44.74 7.02 Site Size (ha) NLP388 ALP418, N/A N/A NLP396 ALP406,

Overlapping Submissions ato h oa Plan. Local the of part as further considered will be site the of portion A N/A N/A Plan. Local the of part as further considered will be site the of portion A Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site

Outcome eotege ytebnft fdvlpet oee ti osdrdta oia and logical a that not considered would is harm it such However that development. balance of on the benefits considered and the is Countryside by It the outweighed area. of be the beauty would of and development appearance character such the and intrinsic that within character the considered positions to is elevated harm It from significant AONB. distance cause Chilterns a the at from and development the including close of to Landscape up pattern harm perceived the cause readily includes would that is which Barton-Le-Clay considered which Barton-Le-Clay to is of extension It Appearance an unbalanced. and as and Character site jarring entire appearing countryside the settlement open of the the appear development of into would centre development site the projecting entire from Barton-Le-Clay, the away to of extension development illogical that an considered harm. as is such of it outweigh benefit above, would public the homes that Notwithstanding of considered number is significant it separations, a design, appropriate Moated providing quality through the high mitigation as and to known landscaping subject Monument heritage screening/soft however Ancient designated Farm, Scheduled the Faldo the to at and harm of site Manor substantial setting Westhey than landscape as less wider known cause the asset would within site is the site of the Development that Moated Listed considered as II AONB. also known Grade Chilterns is Monument the the It Ancient of Farm. Scheduled setting Faldo the the at and within site Manor is Westhey site as The known land. Building agricultural predominantly is site The uses. employment proposes Site assessed. not Site uses. employment proposes further. Site considered is assessed. be it not should above Site site outlined the reasons of For such portion harm. mitigate site a outweigh would the that would features of considered that landscaping portion benefits mature a provide existing that be and follow considered not impacts would is would that it harm be north However, this easily the development. that could to of considered that benefit is Barton the It to by AONB. extension the outweighed the illogical that within an considered the views form is of from would it beauty perceived site Furthermore, and entire AONB. character the the intrinsic of of the development setting to the harm includes cause which would countryside site entire the of Development further of worthy not is site this that national considered to limited development. is contrary the for it be by consideration outlined would outweighed reasons development be appearance the whereby not or For scale, would character policy. that harm the at that enhance development considered or of is preserve Development benefits It to balance. Area. fail planning Conservation likely using the would consideration of dwellings overall AONB. more an Chilterns or on the 10 based by of 2, covered Stage more at or fails 50% Site is Site 1A. green Stage the at from fails land Site of area this be remove to self to required a boundaries be for belt. belt would considered green circumstances be amend exceptional to to developed, scale demonstrated be sufficient to a site of this be For Barton-Le-Clay. to considered from separated not development is for contained own further its considered on be and site could logical This boundary a southern that not the considered would upon is harm development. site it such the However that of development. balance portion of on the limited benefits considered and the is Countryside by It the outweighed area. of be the beauty would of and development appearance character such the and intrinsic that within character the considered positions to is elevated harm It from significant AONB. distance cause Chilterns a the at from and including close Landscape up perceived readily is which

Justification L07Ln tNwpigFr igewd NLP075 Biggleswade Farm Newspring at Land NLP067 House Farm Home ALP474 ALP470 A1 the of west Land Biggleswade ALP442 Biggleswade ALP382 Farm Home around Land ALP244 Biggleswade View Rowletts at Barn Biggleswade ALP221 Drive Saxon of east Land ALP204 ALP194 Road R/O Land ALP182 Farm Fairfield ALP033 Belt Green Clay le Barton Clay le Cottage Barton End Willow NLP484 Rd Sharpenhoe 120 o.s. NLP472 NLP400 NLP396

ID Biggleswade Road Station 2 Street/ Palace 18-20 Sheepwalk Acre/ Four Fairfield Way Albone of west south Land Road Potton of north Land le-Clay Barton- of east north Land Clay Barton-le- of East Land

Site Name igewd Biggleswade Biggleswade Biggleswade Biggleswade Biggleswade Biggleswade Biggleswade Biggleswade Biggleswade Biggleswade Belt Green Clay le Barton Clay le Barton Belt Green Clay le Barton Belt Green Clay le Clay Barton le Barton Clay le Barton igewd Biggleswade Biggleswade Biggleswade Biggleswade Biggleswade Biggleswade Biggleswade Biggleswade

Parish

Nearest Settlement Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not

Green Belt 5.63 1.05 8.77 46.85 201.87 0.10 36.26 0.60 1.55 50.80 1.09 2.86 8.00 6.90 NLP258 46.27 8.00 Site Size (ha) ALP244 NLP271, ALP474 NLP271, NLP415 ALP182 NLP407 NLP415 ALP221, ALP044 ALP406 NLP158,

Overlapping Submissions oa lnprocess Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered will be site the of portion A process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site

Outcome iefisa tg A iewudntacmoaetndelnso more. or dwellings ten accommodate not would Site 1A. to Stage relationship at poor fails its Site and area this southwards in fringe the rural to urban due the terms following Biggleswade. on landscape The impact in balance. its unacceptable planning and is using expansion site consideration identified; overall been an have on issues based 2 Stage at Fails A1. the by separated is and Biggleswade to related well not is Site Biggleswade. 1B. Stage to at related fails well Site not is 3. Site and 2 1B. Zones Stage Flood at within fails more Site or 50% is Site 1A. Stage at fails Site allocation. has for already eligible site not the is because therefore available and be use to proposed considered the not for is permission Site planning 1D. Stage at fails Site the of development Expressway, for planned consideration the further public delayed. to of the be due worthy by may that is outweighed site noted site is is the area it Therefore the However, provide. to development. can harm allocation. has site the for already the above, eligible site that mentioned not the benefits comments is because the therefore available of and be light use to In proposed considered South. the not Pit for is Rookery permission Site at Combinedplanning 1D. constructed the Stage be with at to associated fails is Network planned Site that Heat nearby Facility the to Power to connections and connected for Heat be location, could the to and given development adjacent facility possibilities, traditional location energy also with its are concerns to site.There landscape due in the also site identified on are this aspirations There on are Common. GI there designation. Biggleswade for and for the Plan Area considered Infrastructure Safeguarding being Green Mineral area to Biggleswade a an regards the within to with located next concerns is location archaeological site its are The given There site balance. the planning on on development 2 Stage at fails Site AONB. Chilterns the by covered more or 50% is Site 1A. settlement. Stage from at detached fails and Site Barton-le-Clay to related landowner Poorly the 1B. of Stage agreement at the fails without Site forward put deliverable. been not has therefore site green is the the and 1D, from Stage land at of fails area Site this be remove to self to required a boundaries be for belt. belt would considered green circumstances be amend exceptional to to developed, scale demonstrated be sufficient to a site of this be For Barton-Le-Clay. to considered from separated not development is for contained own further its considered on be site could This boundary southern the upon development. site the of portion limited

Justification ALP376 Hill The of north Land ALP374 Hill The ALP222 ALP216 ALP214 ALP212 ALP176 Farm Maltings ALP009 A505 of north Land ALP022 NLP510 Biggleswade NLP494 Biggleswade Centre MOT Biggleswade NLP458 NLP437 Farm Sunderland West NLP433 NLP415 NLP407 Lodge Holme NLP401 Biggleswade Biggleswade NLP271 Road Furzenhall at Land NLP265 NLP258 NLP213 NLP181

ID Road Station of west Land Barns, The of north Land School Lower Donne John of east Land Road Barford of south Land Road Barford of south Land Lane) (Hill Biggleswade at Land Estate Industrial Way Albone Biggleswade A1, the of west Land 2) (Phase Road Potton at Land Biggleswade Drive, Saxon of east Land House Farm Home around Land Biggleswade of north Land Rd Langford of East and Close Cow of north Land Biggleswade (A1) Rd London off Land

Site Name Blunham Blunham Billington Biggleswade Biggleswade Biggleswade Biggleswade Biggleswade Biggleswade Biggleswade Biggleswade Biggleswade Biggleswade Biggleswade Biggleswade Biggleswade Biggleswade Biggleswade Biggleswade Biggleswade Biggleswade Blunham Blunham Blunham Blunham Blunham Blunham

Parish Blunham Blunham Blunham Blunham Blunham Blunham Blunham Blunham Buzzard Leighton Biggleswade Biggleswade Dunton and Sutton Biggleswade, Biggleswade

Nearest Settlement Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not

Green Belt 8.00 9.30 1.40 3.46 2.63 ALP194 47.28 7.40 2.60 4.47 1.84 1.49 1.20 1.37 1.72 1.63 7.91 16.18 5.50 0.30 134.84 379.72 Site Size (ha) ALP216 ALP374 NLP102 N/A N/A ALP221 ALP182 ALP204 ALP474 ALP244, N/A N/A

Overlapping Submissions ute spr fthe of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site N/A Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site N/A Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered will be site the of portion A process Plan Local from excluded be to Site N/A

Outcome scniee prpit otk owr nyaprino hsst,ti oto salready is portion this site, it this Whilst of settlement. ALP216. portion from submission a detached under only and considered forward Blunham being take to to related appropriate poorly conservation considered is wider is 1B.Site the Stage and at Buildings fails Listed here Site of Development setting balance. the planning on using area. impact consideration significant overall a an have on would based 2 Stage at Fail 3. and 2 Zones Flood within more or 50% is settlement. Site from 1A. detached Stage and at Blunham fails to Site related poorly is allocation. has Site for already 1B. eligible site Stage not the at is because fails therefore available Site and be use to settlement. proposed considered the the not from for is detached permission Site and planning 1D. Blunham Stage to at related fails poorly Site is Site 1B. from Stage detached at barrier. and fails a Buzzard Site as Leighton act to pylons related of poorly number is and Site settlement, 1B. Stage at fails Site uses. employment proposes Site assessed. not Site more. or dwellings ten accommodate not would Site 1A. Stage at fails Site uses. employment proposes Site assessed. not Site allocation. has for already eligible site not the is because therefore available and be use to proposed considered the not for is permission Site planning 1D. Stage at fails Site settlement. the from detached and Biggleswade to related poorly is Site 1B. Stage at fails Site settlement. the from detached and Biggleswade to related poorly is Site 1B, Stage at portion fails A Site Common. Biggleswade be on also the appropriate impact would to more the site due be particularly whole terms, may barrier. ecology, The landscape a of rural. in as terms and unacceptable acts in urban is A1 unacceptable between site the separation whole Biggleswade, spatial The on progress. to impact to related only well site not of is Portion Site 1B. Stage at fails Site uses. employment proposes Site assessed. not Site

Justification L45Ln tDntbeRa NLP017 Road at Land ALP455 ALP306 ALP286 Lodge Valley Top ALP261 ALP207 ALP143 ALP099 ALP026 NLP323 NLP269 NLP210 NLP178 NLP033 ALP421 Road Bedford at Land ALP383 NLP150 Blunham Rd Barford of south Land NLP102 Road Barford at Land NLP061

ID nldn,Cotswold and including, of, rear the to Land Road End 72-114 Chaul of rear the to Land Road End Chaul of east Land Road/A505/Caddington End Chaul near Land Caddington of west north Land Road End Chaul 74-116 of rear to Land Park Business Cotswold of rear the to Land A421 and Rd Bedford between Land Brogborough , Rd Bedford of West Land Brogborough Farm Manor at Land Farm Winterwoods at Land Hulcote Road, Salford at Land Farm Highfield of south Land Blunham Rd Station at Land

Site Name Caddington Caddington Caddington Brogborough Brogborough Brogborough Brogborough Brogborough Brogborough Brogborough Brogborough Brogborough Blunham Blunham Caddington Caddington Caddington Caddington Caddington

Parish Caddington Caddington Caddington Caddington Luton Luton Caddington Caddington Caddington Brogborough Standalone Standalone Brogborough Brogborough Blunham Blunham Blunham

Nearest Settlement re Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not

Green Belt 36.32 1.34 5.84 1.40 1.94 1.71 3.21 4.14 6.76 1.41 8.98 0.55 NLP174 13.41 7.97 1.41 1.70 10.78 3.02 31.46 Site Size (ha) ALP026 ALP455 ALP099 NLP436 NLP148 ALP306 NLP017 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A ALP176

Overlapping Submissions oa lnprocess Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site N/A process Plan Local from excluded be to Site N/A N/A N/A N/A process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local

Outcome iefisa tg B iei oryrltdt adntnaddtce rmtesettlement. the from detached and Caddington to related poorly settlement. is the Site from 1B. detached Stage and at Caddington fails to Site related circumstances. poorly exceptional is for Belt. Site considered Green 1B. a be wider Stage as to the at identified criteria to been fails fulfil contribution not Site not no has does or and it weak Belt this weak, Green to relatively the addition a in In only located would making is it is site as that The Caddington parcel 1E. to Stage extension at way. logical fails unsustainable a Site an represent in not settlement does the site settlement. extend 1B. from Stage detached at and fails a Caddington Site as to acts related barrier. M1 1B.Poorly a the Stage as and at acts Luton fails also or Site topography Caddington Luton, to from related site poorly therefore the is is separating Site site barrier 1B. The Stage uneven. at is having fails site as Site consideration. the it further of highlights of topography and CWS. worthy The site the not suitability. the surrounding average splits interest and plan ecological Furthermore low neighbourhood of Site. both End’s area Wildlife Slip an County and on Wood’ the Caddington impact ‘Folly to The significant the locality a and its be this to would on regard issues there impacts in following potential issues The its indicate balance. circumstances. and consultees planning exceptional AONB from using for Belt. Comments consideration considered Green identified: a overall be wider been as an to the have identified on criteria to been based fulfil contribution not 2, not no has Stage does or and Fails it weak Belt this weak, Green to relatively the addition a in In only located making is is site settlement. that The from parcel 1E. detached Stage and at Caddington fails to Site related Poorly 1B. Stage at fails Site uses. and employment issues proposes landscape Site are assessed. A421. there not from A421 Site site the Bedford on to by levels site separated noise the Brogborough, the of to regarding ground related following concerns rising well The the not balance. to is planning Due site using Road. The consideration identified: overall been an have on issues based 2 Stage at Fail uses. employment proposes Site assessed. not Site uses. employment proposes Site assessed. not Site uses. employment proposes Site assessed. not Site uses. and employment issues proposes landscape Site are assessed. A421. there not from A421 Site site the Bedford on to by levels site separated noise the Brogborough, the of to regarding ground related following concerns rising well The the not balance. to is planning Due site using Road. The consideration identified: overall been an have on issues based boundaries 2 hedgerow Stage Court. good at Blunham and Fail the to trees on setting parkland impact the contains negative forms site an Blunham and The have the House. would in Blunham site space of this green following setting of important The Development as balance. Appraisal. identified planning Area is using Conservation Site consideration allocation. has identified: overall for already been an eligible site have on not the issues based is because 2 therefore available Stage and be at use to Fail proposed considered allocation. has the not for already for is eligible site permission Site not the planning 1D. is because Stage therefore available at and be fails use to Site proposed considered the not for is permission Site planning 1D. Stage at fails Site

Justification ALP006 Park NLP349 NLP083 NLP082 Farm Kiln at Land ALP390 Greenway of north Land ALP287 NLP493 Park Caddington NLP439 Luton of West NLP436 NLP422 NLP418 Rd Dunstable off Caddington Land NLP339 Road End Chaul off Land Caddington NLP217 (Bushwood) Farm Inions NLP174 NLP151 Oaks Caddington NLP148

ID Farms Lane and Ivy at Land site Rear Campton Greenway of side east south the on Land Greenway of the East South the on Land Beeches to next Land Farm/house Oakfield to attached Land Road End Chaul of east Land Caddington of west north Land Park Business

Site Name and Campton Chicksands and Campton Caddington Caddington Caddington Caddington Caddington Caddington Caddington Caddington Chicksands and Campton Chicksands and Campton Chicksands and Campton

Parish Campton Campton Campton Campton Campton Caddington Luton Luton and End Slip Caddington, Caddington Caddington Caddington Caddington Caddington Caddington Caddington

Nearest Settlement re Belt Green Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green

Green Belt 338.29 3.55 1.93 2.51 2.75 120.90 NLP148 45.71 28.00 8.90 117.97 29.25 2.10 0.64 21.20 0.13 1.66 Site Size (ha) N/A NLP436 ALP455 NLP151 ALP143,

Overlapping Submissions oa lnprocess Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered will be site the of portion A N/A Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered will be site the of portion A process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site

Outcome nadto oti tde o uflciei ob osdrdfrecpinlcircumstances. exceptional for Belt. considered Green a be wider as to the identified criteria to been fulfil contribution not not no has does or and it weak Belt this weak, Green to relatively the addition a a in In of only located not making is is is site and that The settlements parcel 1E. existing Stage any at to fails related Site alone. well stand not that to is area scale Site the sufficient logical 1B. East. of a Stage the openness of at to the be fails river on would Site the impact that for also position setting will a zone the site in however flood provides The situated necessary the settlement. be be of the cannot would extent to site portion the extension the a Given present of landscape, zone. may portion surrounding flood site acceptable the the the an on of of impacts outside east sites site the the the to issues and of plain following portions flood The to the balance. even of planning issues existence using The consideration identified: overall been an have on based 2, Stage Fails in Services isolated. almost feel site character, very the their with make on area limited. would impact an very site to in are the likely lies Campton opposite is it grazing, development development that and of new means pasture lack any settlement for the where the used dwellings of land scale edge of large the quality issues few on unique following proximity a The sites within balance. the is planning also from site using away The consideration situated identified: overall be been an and have on area based the would 2, of site Stage setting the Fails garden. pastoral of and the portion from park retain The Comments registered to setting. the enough pastoral area. small area’s this be the in than to retain development smaller need to from considerably an need impacts is be a reducing that may imply site, area park consultees the developable registered of a a site indicates to overall site proximity the this close for its proposal though The progress, issue. to only site of Portion accommodation. G&T proposes Site assessed. not Site and occupiers future for amenity of standard existing good the a and provide coalescence. providing development can and preventing of built and Woodside context the noise of the between aviation north in separation by the settlements, visual affected to and most areas physical areas to appropriate avoid limited an would is which portion settlement. Caddington This the of progress. from east to detached only and site Caddington of to Portion related would Poorly it 1B. as Stage Caddington at to fails extension Site way. logical unsustainable a an represent in not settlement does settlement. the Site from extend 1B. detached Stage and at Caddington fails to Site related AONB. Poorly Chilterns 1B. the Stage by at covered fails more Site or 50% is Site 1A. Stage at fails Site AONB. Chilterns the by covered more or 50% is would Site it 1A. as Stage Caddington at to fails extension Site way. logical unsustainable a an represent in not settlement does the Site extend 1B. Stage at fails Site

Justification NLP008 NLP007 ALP472 ALP456 ALP414 ALP360 Clifton Lane of west Land ALP303 Lane Pedley off Land ALP263 Lane Stanford at Land ALP262 Lane Hitchin off Land ALP236 ALP213 Hill Hitchin at Land Clifton ALP190 Road Stockbridge at Land ALP179 Road Chalton New ALP149 Chalton Rd Luton 9 + 5a NLP480 Farm Chapel NLP435 Hillcrest NLP059 Hillside NLP058 NLP012 ALP445 Chalgrave NLP023 Meadow Flashes at Land ALP010

ID ada ici Road, Hitchin at Land Road, Hitchin at Land Knolls Bandy New Road of west the to Land Road New and Lane Hitchin between Land Farm Harbrook Way Fairground of west and south Land Chalton Road, Luton at Land Willows The to adjacent Land

Site Name Clifton Clifton Clifton Clifton Clifton Clifton Chalton Chalton Chalton Chalton Chalton Chalgrave Clifton Clifton Clifton Clifton Clifton Clifton

Parish Standalone Standalone Clifton Clifton Clifton Clifton Clifton Shefford Clifton Clifton Clifton Shefford Clifton Clifton Chalton Chalton Chalton Chalton Chalton Chalton Tebworth Tebworth

Nearest Settlement o Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green

Green Belt 0.26 3.18 0.59 0.24 3.21 1.07 0.30 6.00 14.46 8.63 10.25 2.50 4.20 0.82 5.18 1.93 7.00 4.79 1.58 3.83 1.65 0.93 Site Size (ha) N/A N/A N/A NLP147 NLP307 NLP110, ALP236, NLP307 NLP110, ALP303, NLP297 ALP149, NLP221 NLP201, NLP297 ALP213,

Overlapping Submissions N/A N/A N/A process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site

Outcome ientasse.St rpssepomn uses. employment proposes Site assessed. not Site uses. employment proposes Site assessed. not Site settlement uses. the leisure from proposes detached Site and assessed. Clifton not to Site related poorly settlement is the Site from 1B. detached Stage and at Clifton fails to Site related poorly is Site 1B. Stage eligible at not had fails is Site has therefore site and the use because proposed available the be allocation. for to for committee considered at not approved is allocation. has permission Site for already planning 1D. eligible site Stage not the at is because fails therefore available Site and be use to proposed considered the not issue. for is this permission Site address planning not 1D. would is Stage site It at the . fails of and Site portion Clifton a between only coalescence forward cause and taking would Manor that Site Clifton considered 1B. Building. on to Stage Listed impact need at II the a fails Grade to is Site the due there of concerns as setting heritage landscape sensitive in on issues the and impact following context adverse The farmed an balance. the have planning conserve will using site consideration settlement identified; overall the been on from have based detached 2 and Stage Clifton at to Failed related poorly is Site 1B. Stage at fails Site settlement the from detached and Clifton to related poorly issue. is this Site address not 1B. would is Stage site It at the Henlow. fails of and Site portion Clifton a between only coalescence forward cause taking would that Site considered 1B. Stage at fails Site more. or dwellings ten accommodate circumstances. not exceptional would for Belt. Site considered Green 1A. a be wider Stage as to the identified at criteria to been fails fulfil contribution not Site not no has does or and it weak Belt this weak, Green to relatively the circumstances. addition a in exceptional In only located for Belt. making is considered Green is a site be wider that as The to the parcel identified 1E. criteria to been Stage fulfil contribution not at not no has fails does or and Site it weak Belt this weak, Green to relatively the addition a in In only located making is is site more. that The or parcel 1E. dwellings Stage ten at accommodate fails not Site would settlement Site existing 1A. the Stage to at related fails well Site not circumstances. is exceptional site for Belt. The considered Green 1B. a be wider Stage as to the identified at criteria to been fails fulfil contribution not Site not no has does or and it weak Belt this weak, Green to relatively the addition a in In only located making is is site more. that The or parcel 1E. dwellings Stage ten at accommodate fails not Site would would Site it 1A. as Stage Tebworth at to fails extension Site way. logical unsustainable a an represent in not settlement does the Site extend 1B. Stage at fails Site

Justification L25Cohl Lakes ALP295 ALP162 NLP361 Lane Hitchin of west Land NLP307 NLP297 NLP222 NLP221 NLP211 Land Hollow NLP201 Clifton NLP161 Clifton Rd New off Land NLP147 NLP146 NLP145 NLP140 Street Broad off Land NLP128 NLP110 NLP057 Clifton Road, New at Land NLP010

ID onr Club Country & Golf Manor Beadlow Rd Shefford of North the to Land Way Fairground of west and south Land Road Stockbridge of south Land Road Stockbridge of north Land Site) PoW (Old Field Harpers Farm Harbrook Clifton Knolls Way of rear the to Land Shefford Rd Hitchin off Land Shefford Rd Hitchin of east Land Clifton Lane, Hitchin off Land Paddock The Shefford

Site Name Clifton Clifton Clifton Clifton Clifton Clifton Clifton Clifton Clifton Clifton Clifton Clophill Clophill Clifton Clifton Clifton Clifton

Parish Clophill Clophill Shefford Clifton Clifton Clifton Clifton Clifton Clifton Clifton Clifton Clifton Shefford Shefford Clifton Clifton Clifton Clifton

Nearest Settlement Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt

Green Belt 3.83 2.93 3.85 4.83 0.79 2.15 2.0NLP189 122.70 4.50 1.71 5.29 2.25 2.18 3.33 3.39 1.20 0.80 3.21 1.09 Site Size (ha) NLP349 NLP110 ALP236, ALP303, ALP149 ALP213, NLP201 ALP179, NLP221 ALP179, ALP456 NLP307 ALP236, ALP303,

Overlapping Submissions oa lnprocess Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site

Outcome lnigpriso o h rpsdueadteeoei o lgbefrallocation. has for already eligible site not the is because therefore available and be use to proposed considered the not settlement. for is the permission Site from planning 1D. detached Stage and at Clophill fails to Site related poorly is Site 1B. Stage Fails allocation. has for already eligible site not the is because therefore available and be use to proposed considered the not for is permission Site planning 1D. Stage at fails Site issue. this address not would is site It the Henlow. of and portion Clifton a between issue. only coalescence this forward cause address not taking would would is that Site site considered It 1B. the Henlow. Stage of and at portion Clifton fails a between Site settlement only coalescence the forward cause from taking would detached that Site and considered 1B. Clifton Stage to at related fails poorly Site issue. is this Site address not 1B. would is Stage site It at the Henlow. fails of and Site portion Clifton a between only coalescence forward cause taking would that Site eligibleconsidered 1B. not had Stage is has at therefore site fails and the Site use because proposed available the be allocation. for to for settlement committee considered the at not from approved is detached permission Site and planning 1D. Clifton Stage to at related fails poorly Site is Site 1B. that Stage considered at is fails further. it Site considered above intrinsic be outlined the not reasons includes will the which is For area, context site countryside. the the the the of in of appearance acceptable a beauty and considered in and character be result character the not would leave upon would development also impact which would the countryside, road, access, of open access for the the insufficient to along is edge landscaping which it hard soft land Furthermore; for of development. strip for space narrow inappropriate way insufficient the is highway two to site For serve due the site. to considered, that the width Road is considered within sufficient Shefford is development a from it major of site reasons a be the safety for not for access would access pedestrian/cycle access the and site of settlementvehicular the dimensions the that narrow from considered to detached is Due and it 2. Clifton Stage to at related fails poorly Site is Site 1B. Stage eligible at not had fails is has Site therefore site and the use because proposed available the be allocation. for to issue. for committee considered this at not address not approved is would is permission Site site planning It 1D. the Henlow. Stage of and at portion Clifton fails a between Site only coalescence forward cause settlement taking would the that Site from considered 1B. detached Stage and at Clifton fails to Site related poorly is Site 1B. Stage at fails eligible Site not had is has therefore site and the use because proposed available the be allocation. for to settlementfor committee considered the at not from approved is detached permission Site and planning 1D. Clifton Stage to at related fails poorly Site is Site 1B. Stage at fails Site

Justification ALP135 Farm End East ALP109 Road Bedford at Land ALP015 Clophill Cattery Boarding Sealawn NLP465 Clophill Street High 120 NLP459 NLP296 Cottage Shepherds NLP200 NLP189 Clophill Lane Little of west Land NLP187 Clophill Clophill Street High 66a NLP149 Plantation Readshill ALP412 ALP405 ALP366

ID od oreEdRoad End Bourne Road/ Crawley of north Land Clophill Street, Back at Land Quarry) Earth Fuller (Former Lakes Clophill Lane Jacques of west Land Lane Jacques of east Land

Site Name Clophill Clophill Clophill Clophill Clophill Clophill Clophill Cranfield Cranfield

Parish Cranfield Cranfield Cranfield Clophill Clophill Clophill Clophill Clophill Clophill Clophill Clophill Clophill Clophill

Nearest Settlement Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not

Green Belt 89 ALP295 38.93 3.28 1.77 8.50 1.14 0.33 9.49 4.60 3.59 1.10 1.74 8.17 4.07 Site Size (ha) NLP266 NLP104 NLP315 NLP104 ALP412 N/A NLP296 N/A

Overlapping Submissions oa lnprocess Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered will be site the of portion A process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site

Outcome ipr nteftr fi ihdt xadbsnse operations. businesses Cranfield expand the which to for this wished constraints as had it present such has if also sites Council future may forward the the and take which in residents to sites Airport for necessary of issues considered number noise not large present is the the would it to considering stage Due ideal this airfield. be also at the not is submitted, to would It site scale infrastructure. the this on of of demand proximity development of residential level a unsustainable sizeable of that an further deal considered in and great result recently a could Cranfield been site here in also this development approved has of development There development planned fringe. and is and rural nature what unplanned this in into of rural Cranfield urbanisation currently extend represent is would following would area site The This this balance. countryside. of planning open Development using currently consideration identified: overall been an have on issues based the 2 enhance Stage and to at the protect mitigation Fail on to provide is required to it corridor. be need and hedgerow would would uneven southern buffering portion is and This site impact, slope. the landscape scarp of address clayland topography important the an because of progress developmentedge to the only to site relation site. of in the Portion views Cranfield. education of key in by development the sites raised by and small concerns affected site, of significant be this east. been would on the also Thrift park to have Marston pocket 150m There to a site across create Wildlife East to County have South aspiration a could looking an is site ridge, identifies there the clay plan and of Cranfield parish species Development the The farmland constraints. of on present slopes impact would open potential site the following a the to The of integral balance. topography is planning the site using and The consideration identified: overall been an barrier. have on a frontage issues based as along 2 acts development Stage site existing at the settlement, Fail of to extend front related would in poorly it road, is as of 1B.Site Clophill stage to at extension fails way. logical Site unsustainable a the an represent extend in not would settlement does it the Site as 1B. Clophill Stage to at extension Fails north. way. logical the unsustainable a to an represent orchard in not surrounding the settlement does and area, Site building the grade 1B. listed of its Stage 2 character within Fails Grade immediate purposes nearby the agricultural the impact for the of negatively used to the setting would actively due compliment site is landscape not The it the does classification. and on it 2 area impacts that the negatively given of it ideal topography Furthermore, not issues sloping settlement. is following the site The of the balance. form of planning built location using allocation. has The consideration for already identified: overall eligible site been an not the have on is because based therefore available 2, and be Stage use to Fails proposed considered the not for is permission Site 2. planning the 1D. Grade and of Stage as settlement edge at designated the the fails road is from to Site this which away up widen land rising development to agricultural uneven, to difficult open topographically due be Lane towards is Lane) would Little site Great it site, the with traffic, the Furthermore, junction lane onto road. the single access at for the (especially suitable is areas only concern issues in road of following narrow areas The very main balance. a the planning is of using One consideration identified: overall been an have on based 2, Stage Fails the extend would it as Clophill to extension way. logical unsustainable a an represent in not settlement does Site 1B. Stage Fails more. or dwellings ten accommodate not would Site 1A. Stage at fails Site

Justification L13Bye aeFarm Gate Bayley NLP173 NLP139 NLP104 ALP363 Close Leys Flitt at Land ALP353 Lincroft of north Land ALP290 ALP289 ALP288 Road Mill of west land ALP238 ALP188 ALP185

ID Cranfield Rd Lodge off west Land Cranfield Rd Bedford of south Land Lane Merchant 32 to adjacent Land Lane Rectory of north Land Road Cranfield of west Land Cranfield Farm, Wharley at Land Farm Green Broad at Land

Site Name Cranfield Cranfield Cranfield Cranfield Cranfield Cranfield Cranfield Cranfield Cranfield Cranfield Cranfield

Parish rnil (uni) Cranfield Cranfield Cranfield Cranfield Cranfield Cranfield Cranfield Cranfield Cranfield (uni) Cranfield Cranfield

Nearest Settlement Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not

Green Belt 3.57 25.54 None 10.89 NLP260 14.65 4.51 85 None 28.51 0.59 26.90 0.35 3.68 3.80 Site Size (ha) NLP315 ALP015, ALP109, ALP386 NLP198, N/A NLP261

Overlapping Submissions oa lnprocess Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site N/A process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site

Outcome lhuhi swl oae oteuiest hsi o utbelcto o housing a for location suitable a itself, not Cranfield is of this settlement university existing the the to to located related well poorly is is it Site although 1B. Stage at fails Site may and CWS a to is proximity it close as relatively terms in landscape species. also in farmland is suitable on It not the impact ridge. is to an distinctive it due have a this development of to residential crest addition the the In for following at topography. suitable The uneven not balance. the is planning of site using Cranfield. nature The consideration in identified: overall sites been an small significant have on of been issues based development also 2 the have Stage to There at relation plateau. scrub Fail in clay contains education the also by of site in raised part The Airport concerns integral operations. Cranfield an businesses the would is expand for which and to constraints this woodland wished present as it also such if may sites future and forward the residents take has for to Council issues necessary the noise considered which for present not sites inappropriate is of it it amount makes available large airfield following found the the The considering to balance. when proximity planning development; sites using residential The consideration identified: overall been an Cranfield. have on in by issues based sites raised 2 small concerns Stage of significant would at development been site Fail the also this to have on relation There development in in landscape. Built Airport education plateau operations. Cranfield open businesses the would the expand for which into to constraints this intrude wished present as it also such if may sites future and forward the residents take has for to Council issues necessary the noise considered which for present not sites inappropriate is of it it amount makes available large airfield following found the the The considering to balance. when proximity planning development; sites using residential The consideration identified: overall been an Cranfield. have on in by issues based sites raised 2 small concerns Stage of significant southern at development been the Fail the also forms to have also relation There site in in plateau. The Airport education clayland operations. Cranfield important businesses the would an expand for which of to constraints this extent wished present as it also such if may sites future and forward the residents take has for to Council issues necessary the noise considered which for present not sites inappropriate is of it it amount makes available large airfield following found the the The considering to balance. when proximity planning development; sites using residential The consideration identified: overall been an have on relation issues based in 2 Cranfield. education Stage in by access at sites raised improve Fail small concerns and of significant renovate development been to plan the also aspiration GI to have an Parish There with The is Spring. space species. and Holywell open farmland land to existing on grazing as impact enhanced, as area an and used this have retained is identifies could be site site should The the which ridge. site of Importance clay gateway development Principle a important of of a Habitat crest is potential the and following a on topography, The landscape uneven balance. plateau has planning open site using to The consideration identified: overall been an have on issues based 2 Stage at Fail uses. allocation. has employment for already proposes eligible site Site not the assessed. is because not therefore available Site and be use to proposed considered housing the not a for is for permission Site location planning 1D. suitable Stage a itself, at not Cranfield fails is of Site this settlement university existing the the to to required.allocation. located related be farmland well poorly would on is is modelling impact it Site flood potential although not 1B. further a is Stage so also it at present is and fails is There site Site Watercourse site. this Ordinary this on an for allotments and achieved for In species be aspiration Monument. could an Ancient access identifies Scheduled how plan a following clear parish to The the adjacent balance. this is planning to it using addition because consideration identified: overall been an have on issues based 2 Stage at Fail

Justification NLP417 NLP394 Farm End East NLP315 NLP293 NLP266 NLP261 Farm Wharley at Land NLP260 Cranfield NLP215 Farm Horseshoe at Land NLP202 Cranfield Glebe The NLP198 NLP176

ID od Cranfield Road, Moulsoe Farm, Stilliters Cranfield Road, Mill of west Land Airport and Campus University Cranfield Road End Bourne and Road Crawley between situated Land Farm Green Broad at Land Farm Boxhedge at Land Farm End Wharley around Land

Site Name Cranfield Cranfield Cranfield Cranfield Cranfield Cranfield Cranfield Cranfield Cranfield Cranfield

Parish Cranfield Cranfield Cranfield Cranfield Cranfield Cranfield (uni) Cranfield End Bourne End Bourne Cranfield (uni) Cranfield

Nearest Settlement Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not

Green Belt 46 ALP188 14.65 6.50 1.23 7.00 None 10.94 2.07 9.94 4.60 238.47 9.25 4.51 Site Size (ha) NLP104 NLP315 N/A ALP135 ALP185 N/A ALP386 ALP353,

Overlapping Submissions oa lnprocess Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered will be site the of portion A N/A process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site N/A process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site

Outcome iefisa tg B iei oryrltdt rnil n eahdfo settlement. from detached and Cranfield to related poorly is Site 1B. species. Stage farmland for at on required fails impact be Site landscape potential also in a would suitable be Mitigation not may plateau. also there spatial is in and important It Airport archaeology an operations.. Cranfield forms businesses the would it expand for which because to constraints this terms wished present as it also such if may sites future and forward the residents take has for to Council issues necessary the noise considered which for present not sites inappropriate is of it it amount makes available large airfield following found the the The considering to balance. when proximity planning development; sites using residential The consideration identified: overall been an have on issues based the 2 enhance Stage the and to at on protect mitigation Fail is to provide it required to and corridor. be need uneven hedgerow would would southern buffering portion is and This site impact, slope. the landscape scarp of address clayland topography important the an because of progress edge to only site of Portion uses. employment proposes operations. Site businesses Cranfield assessed. expand the not which to for Site this wished constraints as had it present such has if also sites Council future may forward the the and take which in residents to sites Airport for necessary of issues considered number noise not large present is the the would it to considering stage Due ideal this airfield. be also at the not is submitted, to would It site scale infrastructure. the this on of of demand proximity development of residential level a unsustainable sizeable of that an further deal considered in and great result recently a could Cranfield been site here in also this development approved has of development There development planned fringe. and and rural nature is unplanned this in what of rural into urbanisation currently Cranfield represent is extend following would area would The This site balance. countryside. this planning open of using currently Development consideration identified: overall been an have is on so issues There based present site. 2 is this Stage Watercourse for at required. Ordinary achieved Fail be an be would and could modelling species access flood farmland how for further on clear aspiration a impact not an to potential is identifies adjacent a it plan is also and parish it site the because this this allocation on to for following allotments addition suitable The In not balance. Monument. is planning Ancient site using Scheduled The consideration housing identified: overall a been an for have on location issues based suitable 2 a itself, Stage not Cranfield at is of Fail this settlement university existing the the to to allocation. located related well poorly is is it Site although 1B. Stage at fails a Site of uses. not employment is proposes and Site settlements assessed. existing not any Site to related alone. well species.. stand not farmland to is on scale Site impact sufficient 1B. potential be Stage a also in at be would suitable fails may Mitigation not Site there plateau. also and spatial is archaeology important site in for an The Airport required forms operations. Cranfield it businesses the would because expand for which terms to constraints this landscape wished present as it also such if may sites future and forward the residents take has for to Council issues necessary the noise considered which for present not sites inappropriate is of it it amount makes available large airfield following found the the The considering to balance. when proximity planning development; sites using residential The consideration housing identified: overall a been an for have on location issues based suitable 2 a itself, Stage not Cranfield at is of Fail this settlement university existing the the to to allocation. located related well poorly is is it Site although 1B. Stage at fails Site allocation.

Justification ALP072 NLP324 NLP047 ALP324 Dunstable ALP323 Centre Health Dunstable NLP498 NLP438 Dunstable NLP341 Rd off Land NLP275 Street West at Land NLP193 Land Pedralbes NLP192 Dunstable NLP116 Avenue French's 1 Unit NLP046 NLP038 Dunstable NLP025 Street West at Allotments ALP468 Cranfield Airport Cranfield at Land NLP486

ID h Rye The & Road off Land Way Greenfield of north Land Rd Biggleswade of south Land Springfield of west the to and Road Biggleswade of south the to Land Biggleswade of south the to Land Farm Jockey Estate Trading Dukeminster former Park/ Phoenix Crescent Mentmore at Land Gate Badgers of West Road, Dunstable of side north on Land of) (Part Allotments Meadway

Site Name Dunton Dunstable Dunstable Dunstable Dunstable Dunstable Dunstable Dunstable ao Bray Eaton Dunton Dunton Dunton

Parish ao Bray Eaton Dunton Dunton Dunton Dunton Dunstable Dunstable Dunstable Dunstable Dunstable Dunstable Dunstable Dunstable Dunstable Dunstable Dunstable Cranfield

Nearest Settlement re Belt Green Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Belt Green Not Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Not Belt Green Belt Green Not Belt Green Belt Green Not

Green Belt 4.72 0.13 4.68 0.27 2.98 27.90 5.71 2.07 1.94 1.54 1.56 0.22 0.83 5.04 0.83 2.98 1.19 Site Size (ha) ALP324 NLP047 N/A NLP432 NLP193

Overlapping Submissions oa lnprocess Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered will be site the of portion A process Plan Local from excluded be to Site N/A process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site

Outcome rsn nteae.Tei hrfr o otyo ute consideration. further species of upon worthy impact not likely therefore would historically is and the The orchards on area. old impact the in would in rich and present is interest vale area archaeological the The of on environment. deal impact issues built great negative following a sites The has the balance. that consultees planning landscape from using Comments consideration identified: overall been an have on based 2, Stage Fails the on impact adverse vale. an open have exposed would and site adverse visible the an the and have following to Dunton would The due of and landscape pattern development balance. settlement back-land planning the is using on site consideration impact the overall the identified: an on been on impact have based adverse issues 2 vale. an Stage open have at exposed would fails and site adverse Site visible the an the and have following to Dunton would The due of and landscape pattern development balance. settlement back-land planning the is using on site consideration impact the overall identified: an avoid been on to have based and issues 2 Dunton Stage of at end respect fails southern to Site location. the frontage this in road in pattern the development settlement along back-land existing remain and must character Development more. local progress. or the to dwellings only ten site accommodate of not Portion would Site 1A. Stage at fails Site accommodation. G&T proposes allocation. has Site for already assessed. eligible site not not the Site is because therefore available and be use to proposed considered the not for is settlement. permission Site the planning 1D. from Stage detached at and fails Dunstable Site to related poorly is Site 1B. Stage at Fails AONB. Chilterns the by covered more or 50% is Site 1A. more. Stage or at dwellings fails ten Site accommodate circumstances. not exceptional would for Belt. Site considered Green 1A. a be wider Stage as to the identified at criteria to been fails fulfil contribution not Site not no has does or and it weak Belt this weak, Green to relatively the addition a in In only located making is is site more. that The or parcel 1E. dwellings Stage ten at accommodate fails not Site would Site 1A. Stage at fails Site ecology. for on required impact be landscape potential also in a would suitable be Mitigation not may plateau. also there spatial is in and important It Airport archaeology an operations. Cranfield forms businesses the would it expand for which because to constraints this terms wished present as it also such if may sites future and forward the residents take has for to Council issues necessary the noise considered which for present not sites inappropriate is of it it amount makes available large airfield following found the the The considering to balance. when proximity planning development; sites using residential The consideration identified: overall been an have on issues based 2 Stage at Fail

Justification L58Ln tWtsEd2 End Witts at Land NLP508 1 End Witts at Land NLP507 2 End Tyrells at Land NLP506 1 End Tyrells at Land NLP505 Farm End Berry NLP462 NLP338 NLP336 Park Eaton off Land NLP483 NLP316 Lane Bower Bray Eaton NLP300 Bray Eaton Lane, Bower NLP250 Bray Eaton at Land NLP204 NLP013 Farm Meadow Doolittle ALP478 Brothers Westrope ALP464 ALP423 ALP192 ALP103

ID Rd of South Land Leighton of East Road, Hockliffe of North Land Meads The to adjacent Land Bray Eaton Lane, Park at Land Road Northall of east Land Lane Bower 25-57 to adjacent Land Bower Lane of rear the to Land

Site Name Eggington Bray Eaton Bray Eaton Bray Eaton Bray Eaton Bray Eaton Bray Eaton Bray Eaton Bray Eaton Bray Eaton Eversholt Eversholt Eversholt Eversholt Eversholt

Parish Eversholt Eversholt Eversholt Eversholt Eversholt Buzzard Leighton Bray Eaton Bray Eaton ough Bray/Edlesbor Eaton Bray Eaton Bray Eaton Bray Eaton Bray Eaton Bray Eaton Bray Eaton Bray Eaton Bray Eaton

Nearest Settlement re Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green

Green Belt 20.29 1.42 8.37 1.03 15.86 0.57 8.07 0.71 0.48 0.49 0.62 0.55 13.83 10.76 2.69 12.19 9.83 2.12 Site Size (ha)

Overlapping Submissions oa lnprocess Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site

Outcome aclta smkn nyarltvl ek eko ocnrbto otewdrGenBelt. Green a wider as the identified to been contribution not no has or and weak Belt weak, Green relatively the circumstances. a in exceptional only located for Belt. making is considered Green is a site be wider that as The to the parcel identified 1E. criteria to been Stage fulfil contribution not at not no has fails does or and Site it weak Belt this weak, Green to relatively the circumstances. addition a in exceptional In only located for Belt. making is considered Green is a site be wider that as The to the parcel identified 1E. criteria to been Stage fulfil contribution not at not no has fails does or and Site it weak Belt this weak, Green to relatively the circumstances. addition a in exceptional In only located for Belt. making is considered Green is a site be wider that as The to the parcel identified 1E. criteria to been Stage fulfil contribution not at not no has fails does or and Site it weak Belt this weak, Green to relatively the circumstances. addition a in exceptional In only located for Belt. making is considered Green is a site be wider that as The to the parcel identified 1E. criteria to been Stage fulfil contribution not at not no has fails does or and Site it weak Belt this weak, Green to relatively the addition a in In only located making is is site that The parcel 1E. and Stage Buzzard at Leighton fails completed between Site is coalescence extension cause Leighton would once Site Eggington 1B. Stage at and fails Buzzard Site Leighton completed between is coalescence circumstances. extension cause exceptional Leighton would for Belt. once Site considered Green Eggington 1B. a be wider Stage as to the identified at criteria to been fails fulfil contribution not Site not no has does or and it weak Belt this weak, Green to relatively the addition a in In only located making is is and site that Bray The Eaton parcel 1E. between Stage Belt at Green fails in Site coalescence cause would Site Edlesborough. and 1B. Bray Stage Eaton at between fails Belt Site Green in coalescence circumstances. cause exceptional would for Belt. Site considered Green Edlesborough. 1B. a be wider Stage as to the identified at criteria to been fails fulfil contribution not Site not no has does or and it weak Belt this weak, Green to relatively the addition a in In only located making is the is site Thus that The HMA. parcel 1E. Luton Stage the at consideration. to acceptable fails further contribution Furthermore Site of enough stop. worthy strong bus not a a is is provide and site site not station the to train issues, considered a flooding regards is both and in portion from drainage locality distance potential its considerable site’s setting, a the landscape following also and the The monument on balance. scheduled impacts planning circumstances. a site using exceptional to The consideration for Belt. identified: overall considered Green been a an be wider have as on to the issues identified based criteria to been 2, fulfil contribution not Stage not no has at does or and Fails it weak Belt this weak, Green to relatively the addition a in settlement.In only located the making is from is site detached that The is parcel 1E. and Stage Bray at Eaton fails circumstances. to Site exceptional related for Belt. poorly considered Green is a be wider as Site to the identified 1B. criteria to been Stage fulfil contribution not Fails not no has does or and it weak Belt this weak, Green to relatively the circumstances. addition a in exceptional In only located for Belt. making is considered Green is a site be wider that as The to the parcel identified 1E. criteria to been Stage fulfil contribution not at not no has fails does or and Site it weak Belt this weak, Green to relatively the circumstances. addition a in exceptional In only located for Belt. making is considered Green is a site be wider that as The to the parcel identified 1E. criteria to been Stage fulfil contribution not at not no has fails does or and Site it weak Belt this weak, Green to relatively the circumstances. addition a in exceptional In only located for Belt. making is considered Green is a site be wider that as The to the parcel identified 1E. criteria to been Stage fulfil contribution not at not no has fails does or and Site it weak Belt this weak, Green to relatively the addition a in In only located making is is site that The parcel 1E. Stage at fails Site

Justification L40Ra fPir il Farm Field Priory of Rear ALP450 ALP447 Road at Land ALP389 Depot Tile and Brick The ALP354 Hill at Land ALP240 Road Flitton off Land ALP131 Flittonbury ALP043 NLP485 NLP442 ALP089 Unit Pig Former ALP027 Road Sutton at Land ALP388 Street High at Land Everton ALP387 of South Land NLP452 NLP362 Farm Manor at Land NLP165 Lane Green ALP094

ID refedRoad Greenfield 81 of rear to Land Fairfield Rd Hitchin of east Land Fairfield Road, Hitchin of east Land Way Elliot and Road Hitchin off Land Everton Rd Sandy 21 at Land

Site Name Greenfield and Flitton Greenfield and Flitton Fairfield Fairfield Fairfield Fairfield Eyeworth Everton Everton Everton Greenfield and Flitton Greenfield and Flitton Greenfield and Flitton Greenfield and Flitton Greenfield and Flitton

Parish Greenfield Greenfield Flitwick Nr Greenfield Wardhedges Greenfield Flitton Fairfield Fairfield Fairfield Fairfield Eyeworth Eyeworth Sandy and Tempsford Everton Everton Everton

Nearest Settlement Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not

Green Belt 0.90 5.89 0.22 0.32 221.06 0.34 0.81 0.96 1.41 1.01 4.37 0.24 0.47 0.58 0.67 9.50 9.04 Site Size (ha) NLP203 NLP442 NLP485

Overlapping Submissions oa lnprocess Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site

Outcome addvlpetwihwudcag h aueo h itrcstlmn atr.Ti site This pattern. settlement historic the back- of related nature poorly the constitute following change would The would site balance. which this planning development of using land Development consideration identified: overall been an Moor. have on Flitwick issues based sensitive limited 2 highly with Stage the setting in at to landscape acceptable Fail views open be open an not and within also cover lies would site vegetation site site This the this pattern. because of settlement terms Development historic landscape land the back- agricultural of related quality nature poorly high the constitute following is change would The would site balance. which this planning development of using land a Development consideration of identified: overall not been an is have on and issues based settlements 2 existing Stage any at to Fail alone. related stand well to not more. scale is or sufficient 1B.Site dwellings Stage ten at accommodate fails not Site would Site 1A. Stage at fails Site Importance. Principle would of development Habitat and a orchard of protected landscape. loss a wider the including the it in as and terms result recorded settlements landscape is separating In site buffer development. the spatial for following Ecologically important suitable The an not balance. of is planning part site using forms The consideration identified: overall been an have on Conservation issues based and 2 Buildings Stage Listed not at the is Fail on site impact the the of to Development Area. due here. terms demonstrated heritage be ponds, in cannot including a appropriate gain habitat contains net semi-natural site hedgerow, and the and Importance Ecologically highly ditch Principle Moor. the of Flitwick within Habitat including is it orchard Valley, and terms traditional Flit area landscape the conservation In of the development. area to for following sensitive setting suitable The landscape not balance. immediate is planning the site using forms The consideration allocation. has identified: overall for already been an eligible site have on not the issues based is because 2 therefore available Stage and be at use to Fail proposed considered allocation. has the not for already for is eligible site permission Site not the planning 1D. is because Stage therefore available at and be fails use to Site proposed considered allocation. has the not for already for is eligible site permission Site not the planning 1D. is because Stage therefore available at and be fails use to Site proposed considered allocation. has the not for already for is eligible site permission Site not the planning 1D. is because Stage therefore available at and be fails use to Site proposed considered the not for is more. permission Site or planning 1D. dwellings Stage ten at accommodate fails not Site would Site 1A. more. Stage or at dwellings fails ten Site accommodate not would Site 1A. Stage at fails Site Site and Strategy Core adopted the in HA20 site allocated an is Plan. Site Allocations 1D. Stage at fails Site circumstances. exceptional for considered be to criteria fulfil not does it this to addition In

Justification NLP272 Hill Flitton at Land NLP203 NLP182 Road Sand off Land NLP172 Farm Manor at Land NLP171 NLP164 NLP127 NLP052 NLP011

ID amClose Moat Farm 7-8 of rear to Land Street High and Lane Church between Land Flitton Rd Greenfield at Land High Street of rear the to Land Lane, Brook 18 House, Brook Flitton Street, High at Land

Site Name Greenfield and Flitton Greenfield and Flitton Greenfield and Flitton Greenfield and Flitton Greenfield and Flitton Greenfield and Flitton Greenfield and Flitton Greenfield and Flitton Greenfield and Flitton

Parish Greenfield Wardhedges Greenfield Flitton Flitton Flitton Wardhedges Flitton Flitton

Nearest Settlement Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not

Green Belt 0.53 3.27 0.86 2.09 0.79 6.71 0.93 1.54 1.62 Site Size (ha) ALP240

Overlapping Submissions oa Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site

Outcome iefisa tg A iei 0 rmr trs fsraewtrflooding. water surface of risk at more or 50% is Site 1A. Stage at fails Site site required. the be flooding site would the the assessment approach around further sequential corridors and the ROW Red considering and as When enhanced scores enhanced. and be retained and to be around need to hedgerows/trees would need extensive in would the Valley/Flitwick role site Infrastructure Flit key the Green sensitive a through of highly plays terms the and In within Area terms Landscape. set Conservation landscape Moor character, the in intimate to suitable distinctive setting not the the landscape is of maintaining the site setting forms the the In site addition to place. the In due this because Buildings. location in Listed this linear and in majority Area suitable is the Conservation not which change this is Flitton drastically of development of would Development number terms pattern and settlement. small heritage settlement settlement the a historic the to access the to related to of related well used nature poorly not is the be and which to therefore back track related would set a poorly site are of is which top It houses the development. large at for following of located suitable The is not balance. and is planning settlement site using existing This consideration allocation. has identified: overall for already been an eligible site have on not the issues based is because 2 therefore available Stage and be at use to Fail proposed considered the not for is permission Site planning 1D. Stage at fails Site trees. mature of number a with not garden site large the set a Ecologically character, is Landscape. intimate it Moor distinctive the because Valley/Flitwick the to suitable Flit maintaining setting sensitive in landscape site highly role the the the key forms addition within a site In plays the Buildings. and because Listed Area terms and this Conservation landscape Area in in Conservation suitable In suitable the be place. not of would this is setting development in the small-scale linear to very majority due a is the location than which change this greater Flitton drastically of nothing of would Development number terms, pattern and settlement. small heritage settlement settlement the a historic the to access the to related to of related well used nature poorly not is the be and which to therefore back track related would set a poorly site are of is which top It houses the development. large at for following of located suitable The is not balance. and is planning settlement site using existing This consideration identified: overall been an have on issues based impacted 2 negatively Stage be highly-sensitive at would the Fail developed. area across were Conservation views site site the ranging the the to wide if if setting with impact landscape exposed landscape The is negative Moor. site a Flitwick the be developed; would wider be there the to this and an were to Monument have addition Ancient would In Scheduled development Area. the because following Conservation Buildings, suitable The Listed not balance. on is planning impact site using inappropriate This consideration negative identified: overall Area. a been an Conservation have have on wider would issues based the it 2 and because Stage Buildings terms sensitive at Listed Heritage highly Fail of in the setting suitable to the not buffer in on also landscape acceptable impact is a be site of not The part also Moor. forms would Flitwick site site the this because of terms Development landscape land. agricultural quality high is

Justification L31Ln tMudnRd at Land NLP321 NLP245 NLP081 NLP039 ALP435 Field One O One ALP345 ALP284 Garage One O One ALP226 ALP177 ALP174 ALP098 NLP449 Road Westoning off Land NLP273

ID Way Chauntry of east Land Drive Trafalgar to adj Land Flitwick Road, Close Hilldene of rear Land Road Froghall and Road Steppingley at Land Road Maulden of east Land Road Maulden to adjacent Land Way Chauntry of east Land behind land and Road Greenfield 96

Site Name Flitwick Flitwick Flitwick Flitwick Flitwick Flitwick Flitwick Flitwick Greenfield and Flitton Greenfield and Flitton Flitwick Flitwick Flitwick

Parish Flitwick Flitwick Flitwick Flitwick Flitwick Flitwick Flitwick Flitwick Flitwick Flitwick Flitwick Flitton Greenfield

Nearest Settlement re Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Not Belt Green Belt Green Not Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Not Belt Green Not

Green Belt 09 NLP321 10.94 2.18 1.70 6.48 20.60 2.67 16.37 9.00 0.76 3.58 0.99 0.54 9.57 Site Size (ha) ALP177 ALP174, NLP246 NLP397 NLP322 NLP245

Overlapping Submissions oa lnprocess Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site

Outcome eeomn ftest ol lohv nipc ntestigo ltikMl Listed Mill Flitwick of setting the SSSI. on Moor impact Flitwick an to have foreground also the important would provides an site and provides the Valley it of Flit terms, following Development to landscape The identity in balance. giving suitable planning circumstances. feature not using exceptional visual Site consideration for Belt. identified: overall considered Green been a an be wider have as on to the issues identified based criteria to been 2 fulfil contribution not Stage not no has at does or and Fail it weak Belt this weak, Green to relatively the addition a in In only located sewage making is a is site to that The adjacent parcel 1E. development. also Stage residential is at for It fails constraint corridors. so Site significant hedge mammals a and and is presents ditch birds site which the for The works at foraging location. required valuable this an be provides in playing would and Flitwick is buffering land and Belt Agricultural Ampthill Green Green 2 of The the Grade merging Flitwick. within within the and lies stopping Ampthill it in between development; role gap for following important small suitable The relatively not balance. a is planning in site using Belt The consideration identified: overall been an have on issues based 2 Stage at Fail flooding. water surface of risk at more or 50% is Site 1A. and Stage Ampthill at between fails Belt Site Green is in Sites coalescence for cause Call would the Site then Flitwick. 1B. this Stage alter part at this. to as fails do wishes use Site to developer employment process the for correct If permission the allocation. planning not use has mixed already wider site a and The Ampthill of 1D. between Stage Belt at Green fails in Site coalescence would cause flooding would for Site assessment Flitwick. 1B. 2 Stage risk. Level at at a fails is and quality.Site site land and SSSI the agricultural levels the as quality water and required 2 of plan, to be Grade terms GI extension also in the An is impacts in SSSI. site development aspiration the The to priority adjoins sensitive a site Listed particularly as the Mill be identified as Flitwick would been ecology of has to setting SSSI risk the SSSI. Moor a on Moor Flitwick be impact Flitwick would an to there have foreground and also the important Building would provides an site and provides the Valley it of Flit terms, following Development to landscape The identity in balance. giving suitable planning feature not using visual Site consideration identified: overall is been an site have on the issues based and 2 Mill addition Stage Flitwick In at of plan. Fail land. setting GI agricultural the parish 2 on the extension Grade impact in the within over aspiration noted concerns priority and raised a quality officer as and particularly Heritage identified levels be was water would Moor of Moor Flitwick terms Flitwick to in that impacts felt could development also recreation/access to officer Increased an sensitive GI is is ecologically. Valley. and site site Flit SSSI The the to Moor threaten identity Flitwick unsuitable. giving to it feature foreground makes visual the SSSI important providing Moor green terms, Flitwick and landscape to ecology in site landscape, for important the of unsuitable of terms it proximity in makes The development Moor following infrastructure. for Flitwick The inappropriate to balance. is proximity planning circumstances. it site’s using exceptional development, The consideration for Belt. identified: overall considered Green been a an be wider have as on to the issues identified based criteria to been 2 fulfil contribution not Stage not no has at does or and Fail it weak Belt this weak, Green to relatively the addition a in In only located making is is site that The parcel 1E. Stage at fails Site a of not is and settlements existing any to related alone. well stand not to is scale Site sufficient 1B. Stage at fails Site

Justification L17Ln eto udnR Harlington Rd Sundon of west Land NLP107 ALP355 ALP181 ALP123 ALP117 Rd Barton at Land NLP466 NLP404 NLP101 Pyghtle The ALP467 Road Barton at Land ALP243 ALP150 NLP492 Birches The off Land NLP444 NLP397 Rd Ampthill at Land NLP375 NLP366 NLP351

ID n Road End Goswell of north Land Road Sundon of west Land Road End Goswell off Land Railway Mainline Midland of west the to Land Road Shillington of west Land Gravenhurst Upper at Land Road Barton 7-37 of rear Land Flitwick Road, Steppingley off Allotments, Garden Flitwick to adjacent Site 1BE MK45 Flitwick, Road, Ampthill Field, One-O-One Club Tennis Ampthill and Flitwick Flitwick of East North Land

Site Name Gravenhurst Gravenhurst Gravenhurst Gravenhurst Gravenhurst Flitwick Flitwick Flitwick Flitwick Flitwick Flitwick Harlington Harlington Harlington Harlington Gravenhurst

Parish Harlington Harlington Harlington Harlington Harlington Gravenhurst Upper Gravenhurst Upper Gravenhurst Upper Gravenhurst Upper Gravenhurst Upper Flitwick Flitwick Flitwick Flitwick Flitwick Flitwick

Nearest Settlement re Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Not Belt Green

Green Belt 1.71 3.56 1.73 0.89 17.90 6.39 2.46 6.39 NLP303 12.89 NLP381 18.14 0.50 14.07 1.62 1.20 0.60 1.02 1.08 Site Size (ha) L11St ob considered be to Site ALP181 NLP107 ALP467 NLP101 ALP375 ALP345 NLP444 N/A

Overlapping Submissions oa lnprocess Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered will be site the of portion A process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site N/A

Outcome diint hsi osntfli rtrat ecniee o xetoa circumstances. In exceptional for Belt. parcel considered Green a be wider as to the identified criteria to been fulfil contribution not not no has does or and it weak, Belt this weak, Green to relatively the addition a in only located making is is Site that 1E. Stage at fails Site settlement. from detached and Gravenhurst to related poorly Site scale. and 1B. its setting Stage to rural at due exposed fails village an Site of on character spill following on urban The impact in balance. adverse result planning an would using have site consideration identified: overall been an have on issues based 2 Stage at Fail landscape adverse avoid would respect and to area frontage the road of the character along impacts. local remain allocation. has and must for already pattern Development eligible site settlement progress. not the the to is because only therefore available site and be of use to Portion proposed considered the not for is permission Site planning 1D. Stage at fails Site and Ampthill between Belt Green in coalescence cause would Site Flitwick. 1B. and Stage Ampthill at between fails Belt Site Green in coalescence cause would Site Flitwick. 1B. and Stage Ampthill at between fails Belt Site Green in parties. coalescence relevant cause the would with sites Site reached for Flitwick. 1B. is call Stage site the at alternative of the fails an outside within Site regarding submitted located agreement be is an still site if can the the process submission Since of planning authorities. landowner an a leisure the that envelope, relevant with demonstrate redevelopedsettlement the reached not be indeed been did to or had submission site site, site site this alternative relocation The for proposed relocated. development, the be for over to available agreement need not would is club site tennis The the 1D. Stage at fails Site uses. would employment flooding proposes for Site assessment assessed. 2 not risk. Level Site at a is and quality. site land and SSSI the agricultural levels the as quality water and required 2 of plan, to be Grade terms GI extension also in the An is impacts in SSSI. site development aspiration the The to priority adjoins sensitive a site particularly as the be identified as would been ecology has to SSSI risk Moor a Flitwick be would there and Building

Justification NLP424 NLP406 NLP356 Farm Hill NLP299 Field Acre Seven NLP226 NLP142 Field Acre Seven ALP460 Winds Four ALP459 NLP471 NLP470 NLP381 Harlington NLP379 Rd End Goswell off Land NLP303

ID 60 Haynes A600, of west and Road End Northwood of north Land Haynes Road, End Northwood of south Land Haynes Rd, End Silver of west Land Haynes Road, High of side West South the on Land 2) (parcel Rd End Goswell off Land 1) (parcel Rd End Goswell off Land Harlington of west the to Land Harlington Road, End Goswell of north Land Harlington

Site Name Haynes Haynes Haynes Haynes Haynes Haynes Harlington Harlington Harlington Harlington Haynes Haynes

Parish Haynes Haynes Haynes Haynes End West Haynes Haynes End West Haynes End West Haynes Harlington Harlington Harlington Harlington Harlington

Nearest Settlement Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green

Green Belt 2.57 1.77 0.81 0.83 ALP117 93.27 2.80 ALP123 13.70 11.80 2.24 0.51 1.77 4.34 3.48 Site Size (ha) ALP460 NLP266

Overlapping Submissions oa lnprocess Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered will be site the of portion A process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered will be site the of portion A process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further

Outcome n a navreipc ncaatro ilg u oissaeadlocation. and scale its to plateau due greensand village open of the character of following on part The impact forming adverse visible balance. an highly planning has is using and site consideration identified: overall ben an of have on part issues based as 2 further Stage any at considered Failed be species not protected will potential process. site and this the trees has constraints, mature also these site’s mitigation site Considering the appropriate The interest. noted providing has allocation way. Ecologist prevent of undertaken. not right to was would of important this amenity is site but protect it The potential, and terms valley. archaeological hedge landscape the boundary in across roadside trees), views the (Lime in conserve features visible landscape highly lower important and the contains elevated of significantly also is development would the site makes here of the landscaping development edge unsuitable, The such the slopes pattern. as on settlement and lies historic density, and the lower shape following change of unusual The area an balance. an is planning in site using settlement The consideration identified: overall been an settlement. have on this whatissues based to in site 2 unique fill the Stage pattern also to at settlement would due Fail the development minimal whilst in this be and gap to would area a Further have this is dwellings. would in 15 this capacity approximately effect education in providing the enough terms, only contributions, be archaeological make to in could appear allocation site not for following the does suitable The there not balance. this is planning to site using addition The consideration identified: overall been an have on issues based 2 Stage at Fail considered Not settlement. existing an to End. related West well and Haynes not land expand is agricultural to Site quality appropriate 1B. teams. high Stage Education is and at and site settlement fails Landscape the the Site by addition between raised In buffer been east. a impact have the as negative concerns to role a Wood site's be Great the would site Warden and There the the pattern Haynes. in settlement of result The historic settlement also dangerous. the existing would be on the A600 would to the location related of this poorly presence at following being the A600 The and the balance. arrangements to planning access on using proposed Access consideration identified: overall considered been an Not have on settlement. issues based existing 2 an Stage to at End. related Fail West well Haynes not settlement. expand is existing to Site an appropriate 1B. to Stage related at well fails circumstances. not Site exceptional is for Belt. Site considered Green 1B. a be wider Stage as to the identified at criteria to been fails fulfil contribution not Site not no has does or and it weak Belt this weak, Green to relatively the circumstances. addition a in exceptional In only located for Belt. making is considered Green is a site be wider that as The to the parcel identified 1E. criteria to been Stage fulfil contribution not at not no has fails does or and Site it weak Belt this weak, Green to relatively the addition a in In only located is making is it is site site. therefore that The the and parcel 1E. of related to Stage portion well related at a be well fails forward not be Site take would could only site site to the the appropriate of of circumstances.considered In part portion exceptional western eastern for Belt. parcel the The considered Green however a progress. be wider Harlington, as to to the identified only criteria to been site fulfil contribution not of not no has Portion does or and it weak, Belt this weak, Green to relatively the addition a in only located making is is Site that 1E. Stage at fails Site

Justification ALP232 Road Arlesey at Land Henlow ALP178 Company Koi Japanese ALP173 ALP073 House Hilltop 38 ALP041 End Henlow 3 Site ALP030 End Henlow 1 Site ALP028 ALP001 Trees New NLP457 NLP440 NLP074 ALP066 NLP502

ID 2 ihStreet High 102- 126 of rear the to Land Road Clifton of South Land Road Clifton 1 to adjacent Land Road Tree Mile Village Garden Wood Checkley Village Garden Wood Checkley Haynes Road, End Northwood of south Land

Site Name Henlow Henlow Henlow Henlow Reach and Heath Reach and Heath Reach and Heath Reach and Heath Haynes Henlow Henlow Henlow

Parish Henlow Henlow Henlow Henlow Henlow isolated Henlow Reach and Heath Reach and Heath Standalone Standalone Haynes

Nearest Settlement Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Not

Green Belt 1.19 N/A 364.89 N/A 381.82 3.14 4.81 1.62 1.05 1.90 1.81 5.18 0.58 1.69 44.98 Site Size (ha) NLP220 and NLP183 NLP219 NLP091 N/A

Overlapping Submissions oa lnprocess Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered will be site the of portion A process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered will be site the of portion A process Plan Local from excluded be to Site N/A process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered will be site the of portion A

Outcome adcp au,test sdsiciei eiaetrsadteoe iw rmtechurch the from views open the to and Further terms Meadow. this heritage Millennium presents in of plan distinctive extension GI is the parish site to The the aspirations recently. factor value, are site key landscape there this a which for was for appeal value one planning landscape site the the would highly of Indeed site a dismissal intrusion. the of the visual of part in and development is physical and it significant setting development, in landscape for following result meadow suitable The and not balance. corridor is planning river site using sensitive This consideration further identified: overall considered been to an be have need on will issues the based site and 2 this A507, Stage of the at portion to Fail a site only the development. A507, of residential the proximity flooding.for to the water corridor to surface landscape Due of the progress. risk retain to at only more site or of 50% Portion 3. is and Site 2 1A. Zones Stage Flood at within fails more Site or 50% is Site prevent 1A. to Stage order at character. in fails historic Henlow Site their and loosing Clifton back-land and between constitute merging gap would settlements this and two retain settlement reduced the to the a important to have is related might very It well portion a development. be small currently not a is would Whilst what it Clifton. reduce following impact, and would The Henlow site balance. between this planning gap of using important site Development consideration the identified: overall of been an portion have a on a issues of based only not 2 forward is Stage taking and at that settlements Fail considered existing issue. not any this is to address It related would site alone. well the stand not of to is portion scale a Site a sufficient of 1B. only not Stage forward is at taking and fails that settlements Site considered existing issue. not any this is to address It related would alone. well of stand not south to is the scale Site to sufficient line 1B. issues existing Stage noise the at traffic from fails potential away Site address sharply to extends help site site. also full extend the could the not the This addition does by settlement. In permission settlement the site. this existing of submitted and the the settlement to as the related far and only as site is the site Reach between The settlements. and permission progress. both Heath planning to with between only relationship Belt site poor Green of a the Portion has in and coalescence Buzzard causes Leighton Site and 1B. Stage at fails Site accommodation. G&T proposes Site assessed. further not and Site quarry area past site Plus the SSSIs. within of are unacceptable. sites number that is archaeological a areas damage important includes working damaged this mineral wider already area; of the has the number affect uses to a will benefits contains views ecological site higher for the and villages essential Furthermore rolling surrounding site. very with the also relationship of is visual comments setting topography the on the on based estates, have development, historic would for following and site suitable The the not balance. impacts is planning the site using regarding The consideration identified: overall been an have on issues based further 2 and Stage quarry area past at site Plus Failed the SSSIs. within of are unacceptable. sites number that is archaeological a areas damage important includes working damaged this mineral wider already area; of the has the number affect uses to a will benefits contains views ecological site higher for the and villages essential Furthermore rolling surrounding site. very with the also relationship of is visual comments setting topography the on the on based estates, have development, historic would for following and site suitable The the not balance. impacts is planning the site using regarding The consideration identified: overall been an historic have on the issues the based of with 2 nature relationship Stage the poor at change a Failed would have site to significantly. full felt pattern the is settlement of portion development western and The settlement progress. existing to only site of Portion

Justification NLP311 Rd Arlesey at Land NLP292 NLP288 NLP268 NLP234 NLP232 NLP220 NLP219 NLP183 Farm Oldfield at Land NLP126 Limes The NLP097 End Henlow 2 Site NLP091 NLP076 Field Farm Town ALP471 ALP427 Road Hitchin 72 ALP265

ID ici Rd Hitchin & Lane Middlefield off Land Henlow Rd Clifton of North the to Land School Lower Derwent to adjacent Land Henlow Rd Clifton of south Land Henlow Close, Howland John of south Land Henlow Road Arlesey off Land Henlow Rd Clifton off Land Henlow Road, Arlesey at Land Road Langford of west Land Company Koi Japanese The

Site Name Henlow Henlow Henlow Henlow Henlow Henlow Henlow Henlow Henlow Henlow Henlow Henlow Henlow Henlow Henlow Henlow

Parish Henlow Henlow Henlow Camp Henlow Henlow Henlow Henlow Henlow Henlow Camp Henlow Henlow Henlow Henlow Henlow Henlow Henlow

Nearest Settlement Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not

Green Belt 0.36 2.03 7.48 3.38 1.28 0.18 0.58 9.21 ALP471 14.08 5.59 1.68 0.75 1.11 1.89 1.09 8.55 Site Size (ha) ALP028 NLP183 ALP178 ALP073 NLP220 ALP178 ALP030 NLP228 ALP173

Overlapping Submissions oa lnprocess Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered will be site the of portion A process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered will be site the of portion A process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered will be site the of portion A Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site

Outcome iefisa tg B iei o elrltdt n xsigstlmnsadi o fa of not is and settlements existing any to related alone. well stand not the to is from scale Site noise sufficient 1B. to gravel Stage addition and at in sand fails this permitted Site with a associated to and noise next access be and the A507. also MSA formalise as would a to identified there within aspiration is site, also the it extraction is with and site Plan site many The GI the for path. Parish across foraging permissive the path provides in permissive and space standing parkland open long to informal a close (GII*). is is Grange There and Henlow land of species. grazing setting settlement open the existing is on the site impact contains landscape The significantly effectively In also which development. could buffer residential Development countryside for following edge. vital suitable The a not balance. provides is planning it site using terms This consideration identified: overall been an issue. have on this taking issues based address that 2 would considered Site Stage site not settlement. at the is from Fail of It detached portion Clifton. and a and Henlow only to forward Henlow related between poorly coalescence is cause Site would 1B. Stage at fails Site site. the of south the the to could of issues This line noise settlement. existing traffic existing the flooding. potential the from water address of away surface to pattern sharply of help the extends risk also change site at or significantly full more 50% would The or is and progress. 50% Site settlement to is more. only Site or site 3. dwellings of and ten Portion 2 accommodate further Zones not considered Flood to would be within need Site will more the 1A. site and Stage this A507, at of the fails portion to Site a site only the development. A507, of residential the proximity 3. for to the and corridor to 2 landscape Due Zones the progress. Flood retain to within only more site or of 50% Portion is further Site considered 1A. to be Stage need will at the site and fails this A507, Site of the portion to a site only the development. A507, of residential the proximity for to the corridor to landscape Due the progress. retain to only site of Portion more. or dwellings ten accommodate a not of would not Site is 1A. and Stage settlements at existing fails any Site to related alone. well stand not to is issue. scale Site this sufficient 1B. address taking Stage would that Site at site considered settlement. fails the not from Site of is detached portion It and a Clifton. Henlow only and to forward Henlow related between poorly coalescence is cause Site not would 1B. therefore Stage is prevent at site to fails This order Site character. in historic Henlow development. their and for loosing Clifton back-land suitable and between constitute merging gap would settlements this and two retain settlement reduced the to the a important to have very is related might a It well portion currently development. be small is not a what would Whilst reduce it Clifton. would following impact, and site The Henlow this balance. between of planning gap Development using important consideration identified: overall been an have on issues based flooding. 2 water Stage surface of at Fail risk at or more 50% or is 50% Site is more. withdrawn Site or Site 3. dwellings and ten 2 accommodate Zones not both Flood would on within Site impact more 1A. significant Stage area. a at conservation have fails wider would Site the which and site Building this Listed on the development by restricted be could

Justification ALP197 ALP196 ALP187 Quest ALP065 Farm End Chapel at Land ALP020 Farmstead Hawhills ALP019 Nurseries House Mill ALP005 NLP420 NLP413 NLP327 NLP298 NLP278 NLP259 A5 of East North Land NLP242 Hockliffe NLP175 Avenue Manor R/O Land ALP184 Road Leighton off Land ALP125 Henlow RAF NLP469 Henlow NLP363 Yard Transport Welch's NLP343 NLP337

ID fCae n odand Road End Chapel of corner east south on Land Road Bedford of rear and off Land Conquest Houghton Lane, Mill at Land Lane The of west south Land Hockcliffe Road, Leighton at Land A5 of the West South the to Land Rd Leighton of south Land Hockliffe Rd Leighton off Land Avenue Manor of rear Land Hockliffe Rd Leighton off Land Site Aggregates Henlow Street High and Road Stockbridge of Land

Site Name Hockliffe Hockliffe Hockliffe Hockliffe Hockliffe Hockliffe Hockliffe Hockliffe Hockliffe Henlow Henlow Henlow Conquest Houghton Conquest Houghton Conquest Houghton Conquest Houghton Conquest Houghton Conquest Houghton

Parish Conquest Houghton Conquest Houghton Conquest Houghton Conquest Houghton Conquest Houghton Conquest Houghton Hockliffe Hockliffe Hockliffe Hockliffe Hockliffe Hockliffe Hockliffe Hockliffe Hockliffe Hockliffe Henlow and Lower Henlow Henlow

Nearest Settlement Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not

Green Belt 3.08 3.90 2.24 0.99 222.68 3.91 0.99 3.41 1.31 3.45 0.47 NLP071 90.87 5.00 0.66 6.74 20.93 0.99 24.20 2.73 1.20 1.92 Site Size (ha) NLP156 ALP125 NLP413 N/A

Overlapping Submissions oa lnprocess Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered will be site the of portion A process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered will be site the of portion A N/A process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site

Outcome lnigpriso prvda omte o h rpsdueadteeoei o eligible not had is has therefore site and the use because proposed available the be for to committee considered allocation. has at not for already approved is eligible site permission Site not the planning 1D. is because Stage therefore available at and be fails use to Site proposed considered allocation. has the not for already for is eligible site permission Site not the planning 1D. is because Stage therefore available at and be fails use to Site proposed considered the not for is causes permission Site and planning 1D. Conquest Stage Houghton at with fails Stewartby. relationship Site of and poor not Conquest a is Houghton has and between site Conquest coalescence The site. Houghton 1B. alone with Stage stand relationship at a a poor Failed of be a not to has is scale site and sufficient The settlements a 1B. existing Stage any at to fails related Site alone. well stand not to is scale Site sufficient the 1B. and Stage Conquest at Houghton fails between Site coalescence would cause it Extension. would as Southern Site Hockliffe 1B. to Stage extension at way. logical circumstances. fails unsustainable a exceptional Site an represent for Belt. in not considered Green settlement a does be wider the as Site to the extend identified 1B. criteria to been Stage fulfil contribution not at not no has fails does or and Site it weak Belt this weak, Green to relatively the addition a in In only located size making is enough is site substantial that The Belt. a parcel 1E. Green of Stage the be more at within to a fails circumstances need create Site exceptional would and warrant portion impacts the to The negative of it site’s portion for settlement. the smaller and the reduce a settlement to help However, the extension would area. to logical A5 the relationship the of poor to heritage a circumstances. adjacent and has exceptional site landscape site for Belt. the overall considered Green on a The be wider impact as progress. to the negative identified to criteria to been only fulfil contribution not site not no has of does or and Portion it weak Belt this weak, Green to relatively the addition a in flooding.In only located water making is surface is site of that The risk parcel 1E. at Stage more at or circumstances. fails 50% exceptional Site is for Belt. Site considered Green 1A. a be wider Stage as to the identified at criteria to been fails fulfil contribution not Site not no has does or and it weak Belt this weak, Green to relatively the addition a in flooding.In only located water making is surface is site of that The risk parcel 1E. at at Stage more more at or or fails 50% 50% Site is is Site Site 3. 1A. and Stage 2 at Zones fails Flood Site within circumstances. more exceptional flooding. or for Belt. water 50% considered Green surface a is be wider of as Site to the risk identified 1A. criteria to been Stage fulfil contribution not at not no has fails does or and Site it weak Belt this weak, Green to relatively the circumstances. addition a in exceptional In only located for Belt. making is considered Green is a site be wider that as The to the parcel identified 1E. criteria to been Stage fulfil contribution not at not no has fails does or and Site it weak Belt this weak, Green to relatively the addition a in In only located making the is within is site being that The not parcel 1E. to Stage promoters. due at site development fails the for Site of available appropriate ownership be an or to and maintain control considered site, to sole not MBDA site site neighbouring the the the of of with portion areas associated the substances exclude hazardous to from progress, separation to only site of Portion 3. uses. and employment 2 proposes Zones Site Flood assessed. within not more Site or 50% is north, Site the 1A. Stage to at need fails not still Site is Clifton. would It and access Clifton. Henlow as and between because gap portion Henlow the a between within only coalescence forward cause take would to Site appropriate 1B. Stage at fails Site

Justification L27TeTurn The ALP257 Field The ALP256 Orchard The ALP255 Gate The ALP254 Stables The ALP253 Avenue Frenchs at Land ALP164 Dunstable West North ALP144 Wixams of south Land NLP371 NLP304 NLP191 NLP156 North Quest NLP071 Camel NLP070 (2) Farm Road ALP352 Farm Road ALP350 ALP314 ALP313 Lane Mill off Land ALP283 ALP233 ALP224 Farm Village of rear Land ALP198

ID us Pit Quest Extension Southern Wixams Close End Duck of Rear and Rd Bedford off Land Grove The of south and north Land Conquest Houghton of south Land Road End Chapel of north Land Extension Southern Wixams Lane London

Site Name Houghton Conquest Houghton Conquest Houghton Conquest Houghton Conquest Houghton Conquest Houghton Conquest Houghton Conquest Houghton Conquest Houghton Conquest Houghton Conquest Houghton Conquest Houghton Conquest Houghton Conquest Houghton Conquest Houghton Regis Houghton Regis Houghton Regis Houghton Regis Houghton Regis Houghton Regis

Parish Bidwell Bidwell Bidwell Bidwell Bidwell Regis Houghton Dunstable Conquest Houghton Standalone Conquest Houghton Conquest Houghton Conquest Houghton Conquest Houghton End How Conquest Houghton Conquest Houghton Conquest Houghton Conquest Houghton Conquest Houghton Conquest Houghton

Nearest Settlement re Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not

Green Belt 4.01 2.55 2.99 4.18 8.38 NLP191 68.00 0.65 1.54 1.52 0.85 3.75 1.98 4.26 44.03 66.00 62.18 ALP224 68.00 2.62 9.86 137.27 1.45 Site Size (ha) ALP260 NLP346 ALP260, NLP40 ALP260, ALP481 ALP260, NLP345 ALP260, N/A NLP306 N/A ALP196 ALP065 ALP005

Overlapping Submissions oa lnprocess Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site N/A Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered will be site the of portion A Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site

Outcome sbigcniee spr ftelre umsinALP260 submission larger the of part as considered being ALP260 Is submission larger the of part as considered being ALP260 Is submission larger the of part as considered being ALP260 Is submission larger the of part as considered being ALP260 Is submission circumstances. larger exceptional the for Belt. of considered Green a part be wider as as to the identified considered criteria to been being fulfil contribution not Is not no has does or and it weak Belt this weak, Green to relatively the addition a in In only located is making is site is site the that The Thus parcel 1E. lost. Stage be at would fails this thatSite assessment. of area further uniqueness the of historical of be worthy and setting would not AONB open and the the Bedfordshire onto Furthermore, Central onset development. to provides any value regarding by high site upon very the impacted of with issues negatively is issues following that the The monument indicate balance. scheduled consultees planning the from using Core comments consideration North identified: overall adopted been an the have on in based housing 2, for Stage allocated Fails already is MA3) site (Policy The Strategy 1D. Stage at fails Site uses. employment proposes Site assessed. not Site allocation. has for already eligible site not the is because therefore available and be use to 3. proposed considered and the not 2 for is Zones permission Site Flood planning 1D. within Stage more at or fails 50% Site is Site causes 1A. and Stage Conquest at Houghton fails with Site relationship a Stewartby. poor of and a not Conquest has is Houghton site and between The settlements coalescence existing 1B. any Stage to at a related Failed of alone. well not stand not is to is and scale Site settlements sufficient 1B. existing Stage any at to fails related Site alone. well stand not to is scale Site sufficient 1B. Stage at fails Site of portion a only forward the issue taking and this that address considered Conquest would not Houghton site is between the It coalescence allocation. has Wixams. cause for already at would eligible site development Site not the permitted 1B. is because Stage therefore available at and be fails use to Site proposed considered the not for is permission Site planning 1D. Stage at fails Site the from detached and Conquest Houghton to related poorly is Site settlement. 1B. Stage at fails Site allocation. for

Justification L34Ln tWnsrDrive Windsor at Land NLP344 Gates The NLP334 Totternhoe NLP306 Park Oakwell NLP285 NLP274 North Regis Houghton NLP257 Rd, Bedford of west Land NLP132 Orchard The NLP040 Bungalow The NLP024 Road Bedford off Land ALP481 Barn Highfield ALP432 ALP380 ALP307 ALP299 Vision Bidwell The ALP260 ALP259 ALP258

ID Way Coopers of west Land Road of Houghton side east the at Land Mount) (Dell Hall Gospel Bidwell Way Coopers of west Land Road Bedford of west Land Road link A5-M1 proposed off north Land

Site Name Houghton Regis Houghton Regis Houghton Regis Houghton Regis Houghton Regis Houghton Regis Houghton Regis Houghton Regis Houghton Regis Houghton Regis Houghton Regis Houghton Regis Houghton Regis Houghton Regis Houghton Regis Houghton Regis Houghton Regis

Parish Regis Houghton Bidwell Dunstable Regis Houghton Regis Houghton Regis Houghton Bidwell Bidwell Bidwell Bidwell Bidwell Regis Houghton Bidwell Regis Houghton Bidwell Bidwell Bidwell

Nearest Settlement Belt Green Not Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green

Green Belt 1.19 15.13 4.63 2.97 4.73 4.21 19.30 6.78 1.00 N/A 261.98 4.62 0.85 1.07 2.24 0.87 0.93 0.78 Site Size (ha) ALP254 ALP260, ALP144 ALP299 ALP259 ALP260, ALP255 ALP260, ALP256 ALP260, ALP254 ALP260, ALP260 N/A N/A NLP274 NLP024 ALP432, ALP256, ALP254, NLP135, NLP346, ALP257, NLP334, ALP481, NLP345, ALP253, ALP259, NLP132, ALP260 NLP132, ALP260

Overlapping Submissions oa lnprocess Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered will be site the of portion A process Plan Local from excluded be to Site N/A

Outcome seset aebe ae hc lal hwteoe pc,bidnso adt be to land or buildings space, open the show requirements. clearly to which surplus taken not been should is have space it Assessments open Regis, - existing Houghton unless: considering of on when settlement built which the following be space within The open is balance. designated site planning on the using situated Although consideration identified: overall been an have on issues Based 2. assessment. ALP260 Stage further submission at of larger Fail worthy the not a of is have part site would as The site considered area. the being the means MaidenIs of area the setting the and the to site on value wildlife impact high county negative of adjacent issues very is an following which to The monument regards balance. scheduled in planning Bower not locality using is its consideration Sites identified: overall for been an Call have a on the of based then part 2, this as Stage this. alter Space Fails do to Green to wishes for process developer permission correct the planning the If has allocation. already use site mixed The Regis. wider 1D. Houghton Stage to at related fails poorly Site is allocation. has Site for already 1B. eligible site Stage not the at is because fails therefore available Site and be use to not proposed considered is the not Sites for is for permission Site Call planning a 1D. the of Stage then part at this as fails this. alter Space Site do to Green to wishes for process developer permission correct the planning the If has allocation. already use site mixed The wider 1D. Stage ALP260 at submission fails larger Site the of part as considered being ALP260 Is submission larger the of part as considered being ALP260 Is submission larger the of part as considered being ALP260 Is submission larger the would of it part as as Regis considered Houghton being to Is way. extension unsustainable logical an a in represent settlement not the does extend Site 1B. Stage at Fails process. application any the Allocation, through Regis made Houghton be North should the permission within planning included this is to Site changes 1D. stage at fails Site further. progressed Green be for not allocated will are allocation which North submission Regis the Houghton of wider parts the the in progress, Space to only site of Portion ALP260 submission larger the of part as considered being Is uses. employment proposes Site assessed. not Site

Justification L46Lbru am1 Farm Laburnum NLP446 NLP229 Hyde NLP228 Hyde East of north Land ALP052 NLP035 NLP034 NLP384 NLP383 NLP218 NLP212 M1 of East NLP190 Park Business Tree Rook NLP015 Road Bedford NLP346 House Farm Bidwell NLP345

ID 0 M1 10A Junction of south Land Farm End Thrales adjoining Land (2) Crawley Husborne Road, Bedford at Land Crawley Husborne Road, Bedford at Land Road Wavendon of West Land Road of Broughton South M1, of east Land Rd Salford off Land Salford Road Broughton 51

Site Name uct and Hulcote Salford and Hulcote Salford and Hulcote Salford and Hulcote Salford and Hulcote Salford and Hulcote Regis Houghton Regis Houghton Hyde Hyde Hyde Crawley Husborne Salford

Parish ee' re re Belt Green Green Peter's Standalone Harpenden Hyde Crawley Husborne Standalone Salford Standalone Standalone Salford HMA) Keynes (Milton Keynes Milton and Salford Hulcote, Salford Regis Houghton Bidwell

Nearest Settlement re Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Belt Green

Green Belt 1.21 2.58 1.88 4.25 41.32 37.52 3.30 0.39 14.59 3.17 27.35 7.13 0.19 708.92 Site Size (ha) NLP447 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A ALP253 ALP260,

Overlapping Submissions oa lnprocess Plan Local from excluded be to Site N/A process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site N/A N/A process Plan Local from excluded be to Site N/A N/A process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site

Outcome al tSae1.St spol eae oPtrsGenaddtce rmtesettlement. the from detached and Green Peter's to related poorly is Site 1B. Stage at Fails settlement. uses. the employment from proposes detached Site and assessed. Harpenden not to Site related circumstances. poorly exceptional is for Belt. Site considered Green 1B. a be wider Stage as to the identified at criteria to been fails fulfil contribution not Site not no has does or and it weak Belt this weak, Green to relatively the addition a in In only located making is is site that The parcel 1E. Stage at fails Site uses. employment proposes Site assessed. not Site uses. employment proposes preserved Site well assessed. of not presence Site Salford the of to pattern due settlement site the the to following earthworks. with well The medieval issues relate balance. archaeological not planning are does using there site consideration and the overall identified: an ben on have based issues 2 Stage at fails Site uses. employment proposes Site assessed. not Site uses. employment proposes more. Site or assessed. dwellings not ten Site accommodate not would Site 1A. whole Stage in at either fails site, Site this that of including development network be of road would part. benefits strategic that in the the harm or outweigh with the would relationship as agricultural Keynes poor well versatile Milton sites as most within the landscape and of valued best virtue a the by of of caused loss loss substantial the the area, site, impacts, landscape, the this ecological this of of of land, of appearance development part character and by as the character caused arise to the harm would harm to the that harm that benefits of substantial considered other Area includes is all Market which it and Housing site, CBC Strategic this of the balance, of need within On development housing need balance. the housing planning and of using Keynes level consideration Milton settlement. the overall the to an from regard on detached having based and when 2 Salford Stage to at related fails poorly Site is Site 1B. Stage at fails ALP260 Site submission larger the of part as considered being ALP260 Is submission larger the of part development. not as for is considered assessment it being further above, Is of outlined worthy reasons very is the a site For in as this requirement. infrastructure well that to green as considered surplus essential settlement if provides the population Even also within in area. site spaces increase dense The open the spaces. retain and open to 2 provided pressure and newly more 1 puts North this Regis brings, Houghton this of allocations recent would the that the Given provision and recreation space loss. and open has the sports of land outweigh alternative provision no provide better furthermore, not or requirements, would equivalent to development provide surplus can is Leisure that site CBC’s identified this (NPPF). been that Framework state Policy not Planning does National which Strategy the for within needs indicated the is provision, itself This recreational settlement will loss. and the it the sports within location, outweigh alternative identified sites’ clearly for be the is could Given development elsewhere location. better The location suitable or - suitable a equivalent a in by that quality replaced unlikely and be be quantity would of development terms proposed in the provision from resulting loss The -

Justification NLP079 Field Hill Thistle NLP066 Road Prospect of Top NLP019 Field Home ALP451 Road Station off Land ALP234 Field Hill Thistle ALP132 Field Hill Thistle ALP071 Road Station at Land ALP038 ALP003 Street High 40 at Land ALP002 NLP476 Rd Clayhall NLP475 Allotments Rd Clayhall NLP467 Field Plewis NLP331 Farm Lane Hollicks NLP108 WISE003 NLP022 WISE002 NLP021 WISE001 NLP020 NLP005 ALP311 ALP301 ALP300 ALP084 2 Farm Laburnum NLP447

ID Way Flexmore of north Land School Lower Langford adjoining Site School Primary Kensworth Farm Lane Hollicks at Land (2) Estate Industrial Packhorse Estate Industrial Packhorse Road Beech of east south Land

Site Name Langford Langford Langford Langford Kensworth Kensworth Kensworth Kensworth Kensworth Kensworth Kensworth Kensworth Kensworth Kensworth Kensworth Kensworth Kensworth Hyde Langford Langford Langford Langford Langford Langford

Parish Langford Langford Langford Langford Langford Langford Langford Langford Langford Langford Kensworth Kensworth Kensworth Kensworth Kensworth Kenworth Kenworth Kenworth Kensworth Kensworth Kensworth Kensworth Dunstable Belt Green Green Peter's

Nearest Settlement Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green

Green Belt 3.96 3.73 1.52 4.19 25.50 3.96 1.83 ALP301 10.79 8.90 NLP446 15.09 1.86 3.94 2.44 1.93 5.99 2.84 1.50 1.80 0.60 0.61 0.84 3.07 1.51 3.94 Site Size (ha) ALP038 ALP071 ALP132, N/A NLP066 ALP071, NLP066 ALP132, NLP280 ALP311 NLP108

Overlapping Submissions oa lnprocess Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site

Outcome lnigpriso o h rpsdueadteeoei o lgbefrallocation. has for already eligible site not the is because therefore available and be use to proposed considered the not for is permission Site planning 1D. Stage at fails Site extension logical a not settlement, the to related poorly is Site 1B. Stage at fails Site allocation. has for already eligible site not the is because therefore available and be use to proposed considered the not for is permission Site planning 1D. Stage at fails Site allocation. has for already eligible site not the is because therefore available and be use to proposed considered the not for is permission Site planning 1D. Stage at fails Site extension logical a not settlement, the to related poorly is AONB. Site Chilterns 1B. the Stage by at covered fails more Site or 50% is AONB. Site Chilterns 1A. the Stage by at covered fails more Site or 50% is AONB. Site Chilterns 1A. the Stage by at covered fails more Site or 50% is AONB. Site Chilterns 1A. the Stage by at covered fails more Site or 50% is AONB. Site Chilterns 1A. the Stage by at covered fails more Site or 50% is AONB. Site Chilterns 1A. the Stage by at covered fails more Site or 50% is AONB. Site Chilterns 1A. the Stage by at covered fails more Site or 50% is AONB. Site Chilterns 1A. the Stage by at covered fails more Site or 50% is AONB. Site Chilterns 1A. the Stage by at covered fails more Site or 50% is AONB. Site Chilterns 1A. the Stage by at covered fails more Site or 50% is AONB. Site Chilterns 1A. the Stage by at covered fails more Site or 50% is AONB. Site Chilterns 1A. the Stage by at covered fails more Site or 50% is AONB. Site Chilterns 1A. the Stage by at covered fails more Site or 50% is Site 1A. settlement. Stage the at from fails detached Site and Green Peter's to related Poorly 1B. Stage Fails

Justification NLP073 Rd Soulbury of north Land NLP049 NLP018 ALP400 ALP318 Road Stoke of East Land ALP148 Land Chiltern-Hunt The ALP090 ALP070 Langford ALP064 Langford Street, Church NLP309 NLP302 Triangle Langford NLP280 Field Bridge NLP230 NLP144 NLP143 Lane Jubilee off Land NLP111

ID Barn Chamberlains Northern Land Associated and Site Camden The Linslade West 2 Phase Linslade CEMEX Road Stoke 133 to adjacent Land Barn Chamberlains Northern Lane Curneys and Rd Prospect off Land Langford Way Andrews St off Land Langford Street, Church at Land

Site Name Linslade Leighton Linslade Leighton Linslade Leighton Langford Langford Langford Langford Langford Langford Linslade Leighton Linslade Leighton Linslade Leighton Linslade Leighton Linslade Leighton Linslade Leighton

Parish Linslade Leighton Linslade Leighton Linslade Leighton Linslade Leighton Linslade Leighton Linslade Leighton Linslade Leighton Linslade Leighton Linslade Leighton Langford Langford Langford Langford Langford Langford Langford

Nearest Settlement re Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Not Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not

Green Belt 3.57 10.76 3.70 1.27 2.32 7.47 9.01 1.73 2.83 2.69 3.30 7.17 5.47 1.33 NLP073 16.00 3.54 Site Size (ha) ALP064 NLP364 N/A NLP464

Overlapping Submissions oa lnprocess Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site N/A N/A process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site

Outcome lnigpriso o h rpsdueadteeoei o lgbefrallocation. has for already eligible site not the is because therefore available and be circumstances. use to exceptional proposed considered for Belt. the not considered Green for a is be wider permission as Site to the planning identified 1D. criteria to been Stage fulfil contribution not at not no has fails does or and Site it weak Belt this weak, Green to relatively the addition a in In only located making is is site that The parcel 1E. Stage adjoining at the of fails of loss Site activities the future in the resulting following properties. impact area the employment potentially employment balance. could an planning and within using land located consideration employment site overall identified: an been on boundary. have based Council's issues 2 Bedfordshire Stage Central at of fails outside Site lies Site assessed. been not has Site uses. employment would proposes it Site as assessed. Linslade not Leighton Site way. to unsustainable extension an logical in a settlement represent the not extend does Site 1B. Stage Fails for further considered be not more will considered site be and the could services that it of considered development, range development. is the wide It in a development. included to for is access appropriate mitigation and Leighton ground. appropriate provision However, rising If the site. the with the on facilities. town developing scale the sustainable to this of a regards of ecology is with impact and Linslade concerns visual landscape ecological for the also potential on are the impact Leighton There have to to would potential extension site the an following The have considered The area. to be balance. considered can planning is site using it the consideration Linslade, Although overall allocation. has identified: an for already been on eligible site have based not the issues 2 is because Stage therefore available at and be fails use to Site proposed considered the not for is permission Site planning 1D. Stage at fails Site further of worthy not is site the Therefore as road. issues main access the existing onto be feature access may ‘Triangle’ of there the assessment. point Also of clear village. loss no the the would is of in it there form resulting settlement built village, the the the of characterises of heart following that character the The the within balance. on location planning impact its using severely Given consideration identified: overall been an have on issues Based 2, Stage at Fails

Justification NLP177 Road Marston at Land NLP121 at Land NLP103 Rd Marston off Land NLP080 Road Marston at Land ALP416 Ridge Greensand ALP344 ALP215 Farm Westmead ALP087 Estate Industrial Chiltern NLP495 Land Chiltern-Hunt The NLP464 Park Spinney NLP456 NLP364 Chairs Office Pledge NLP310 Park Spinney NLP124

ID Farm End Boughton at Land End Tick Sheep of north Land Soulbury Linslade, West at Land

Site Name Lidlington Lidlington Lidlington Lidlington Lidlington Lidlington Lidlington Linslade Leighton Linslade Leighton Linslade Leighton Linslade Leighton Linslade Leighton Linslade Leighton Lidlington

Parish ogtnEnd Boughton Lidlington Lidlington Lidlington Lidlington Lidlington End Sheeptick End Sheeptick Linslade Leighton Linslade Leighton Linslade Leighton Linslade Leighton Linslade Leighton Linslade Leighton

Nearest Settlement Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Belt Green Not Belt Green Belt Green Not Belt Green Not

Green Belt 0.87 1.16 2.60 5.74 2.46 45.06 3.67 1.06 186.50 2.62 1.57 1.71 3.42 0.88 Site Size (ha) ALP416 NLP482 NLP121 ALP400 ALP400

Overlapping Submissions oa lnprocess Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site N/A Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site

Outcome asn amt h hrce n perneo h ra hrfr ti osdrdta the benefits. that the considered outweigh is demonstrably it and Therefore significantly area. would the landscape, development of wider by appearance the caused and of harm character quality the or neither self to character landscape, a harm countryside this provide causing varied of to the setting whole, enhancing rural a the nor the as of conserving erode or beauty unacceptably part and would in character development site the to contained this to difficult of harm be is development substantial would it Therefore in landscape Furthermore; in countryside. result the network. or likely upon way terms would development of landscape and of right in mitigate impact public either visual the way wider of of the parts right development considered tranquil the site, more for the quieter necessary of the isolation topography respecting the the a provide to given to due Even fail buffers landscape. and would landscape wider character of the the in provision from using change for viewed those a potential when to to and apparent lead network immediately would distance. footpath be site a associated would this at in development on and landscape that development up a and any close is appearance that experienced and doubt is landscape no which the which is time, through site There leisure ways the their of through people, spend right network local people public way by which of of valued network right clearly a used are to well which connects very Trail the and Bunyan through extensive John walk is an the Ridge site featuring and Greensand The site the balance. the features planning of and using centre landscape consideration allocation. has wider overall for already the an eligible site within on not the prominent based is because 2 therefore available Stage and be at use to Fail proposed considered the not for is permission Site planning 1D. Stage at fails Site allocation. has for already eligible site not the is because therefore available and be use to proposed considered allocation. has the not for already for is eligible site permission Site not the planning 1D. is because Stage therefore available at and be fails use to Site Landscape. proposed considered Ridge the not Greensand further for is the for permission Site from appropriate planning 1D. views not Stage the is at to it fails open terms Site is landscape site in The is the and dwellings. it as uneven 10+ units, development is of three site development for the density permission of higher planning following topography a have The for does balance. appropriate site planning considered the using not settlement. Whilst consideration the identified: overall from been an detached have on and issues based Lidlington 2 to Stage related at poorly Fail settlement. is the Site from 1B. detached Stage and at Lidlington fails to Site related poorly is Site 1B. Stage at fails Site boundary. Council's Bedfordshire Central of outside lies Site assessed. been not has Site

Justification NLP054 Paddocks The NLP037 NLP036 NLP031 NLP030 NLP029 NLP028 NLP027 NLP026 NLP014 A421 the to adjacent Land ALP426 ALP315 Street High of north Land ALP114 ALP011 Field Copemans NLP482 NLP372 Valley Marston NLP370 Farm Great Upper NLP256

ID Shelton Lower and Moretaine Marston at Land Club Watersports Stewartby (north) Shelton Upper Road, Shelton Upper at Land Wootton Lane Hoo at Land Shelton Upper Road, Shelton Lower at Land (south) Shelton Upper Road, Shelton Upper at Land Shelton Upper Road, Shelton Upper 39 r/o to Land (2) (north) Shelton Upper Road, Shelton Upper at Land Moretaine Marston End, Wood at Land Road Shelton Lower off Land Road Shelton Lower at Land Moretaine Marston of south Land

Site Name Moretaine Marston Moretaine Marston Moretaine Marston Moretaine Marston Moretaine Marston Moretaine Marston Moretaine Marston Moretaine Marston Lidlington Lidlington Lidlington Lidlington Moretaine Marston Moretaine Marston Moretaine Marston Moretaine Marston Moretaine Marston Moretaine Marston

Parish oe Shelton Lower Moretaine Marston Stewartby Shelton Upper Green Wooton Shelton Upper Shelton Upper Shelton Upper Moretaine Marston Moretaine Marston Shelton Lower Shelton Lower Lidlington Moretaine Marston Moretaine Marston and Lidlington Lidlington

Nearest Settlement Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not

Green Belt 2.99 0.65 NLP370 20.59 587.58 3.85 185.39 2.00 4.93 0.74 15.06 5.77 14.36 0.07 0.40 5.38 1.97 2.19 0.56 Site Size (ha) ALP426 NLP037 NLP312 NLP054 NLP103 ALP200

Overlapping Submissions oa Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site

Outcome iefisa tg B iei oryrltdt aso oean n eahdfrom detached and Moretaine Marston a to of related not poorly is is and Site settlements settlement. 1B. existing Stage any at to fails related Site alone. well stand not to is scale Site sufficient 1B. Stage at fails Site a of not is and settlements existing any to related alone. well stand not to is scale Site sufficient 1B. Stage at fails Site would which portion no is settlements. there existing as the portion Lower to a and relationship only enough forward Shelton strong take Upper a to between have appropriate coalescence not cause is would It Site Shelton. 1B. more. Stage or at dwellings fails ten Site accommodate not would Site 1A. Stage at fails Site from detached and Moretaine Marston to related poorly is from Site detached settlement. 1B. and Stage Moretaine at Marston fails to Site related poorly is Site settlement. 1B. Stage at fails Site size this size. on it’s for with MSA. to opportunities recently, a due Mitigation Moretaine within limited built. Marston is be be in site would to development the yet of and commitments deal site outstanding great the significant a through works). been directly earth in also passes settlement unsuitable has also and is There RoW enclosure Scheduled it trail Farm two this Vale Moat of to Marston and setting addition The Site the in Moated within End be flooding, (Thrupp would of following Monuments site risk The the at balance. because it planning terms site using archaeological This consideration identified: overall been an have on issues based 2 Stage at Fail settlement. the from detached and Lidlington to related poorly is Site 1B. Stage at fails Site

Justification L45Ln tSlo Road at Land ALP415 ALP409 Barns The at Land ALP394 ALP327 ALP326 ALP250 Farm Sables High ALP153 ALP151 ALP116 ALP055 Ampthill of east Land ALP053 ALP051 Farm Old at Land ALP023 Hill Marston on Land NLP509 NLP312 Lane End Wood NLP199

ID adnr Close Gardeners of rear the to Land Road Flitwick of west the to Land Snow Hill of north the to Land Farm Limbersey North to adjacent Land Road Clophill of north Land Road Clophill 131 and 129A between Land Kingsbrook adjoining Land Road Clophill of north Land Rd Shelton Lower of north Land

Site Name Maulden Maulden Maulden Maulden Maulden Maulden Maulden Maulden Moretaine Marston Moretaine Marston Moretaine Marston Maulden Maulden Maulden Maulden Maulden

Parish Maulden Maulden Maulden Maulden Maulden isolated Maulden Maulden ill Maulden/Cloph Maulden Ampthill ill Maulden/Cloph Maulden Cranfield Shelton Lower Moretaine Marston

Nearest Settlement Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not

Green Belt 3.94 NLP390 34.76 1.06 11.87 3.81 0.56 3.51 2.31 2.81 2.67 3.76 NLP445 10.81 0.75 2.27 0.92 1.03 Site Size (ha) NLP342 NLP129 NLP287 NLP287 NLP087 NLP276, NLP270, ALP114

Overlapping Submissions oa lnprocess Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered will be site the of portion A process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered will be site the of portion A process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site

Outcome itntv n itrclstlmn atr hc ossso ubro eaaeprswith parts separate of number a a has of Maulden consists Maulden. an which of in pattern parts lies settlement distinct because historical two development and currently for following distinctive are suitable The what not balance. between is planning gap site using important This consideration identified: overall been an have on issues based 2 Stage at Fail settlement. from detached and Maulden to related poorly is this Site address 1B. would Stage site at the fails of Site portion and a Maulden only between forward Belt taking Green that in issue. considered coalescence this not cause address is would would It Site site Ampthill. 1B. the Stage of at portion and fails a Ampthill Site only between forward Belt taking Green that in issue. considered coalescence settlement. not cause from is would detached It Site and Maulden. 1B. Maulden Stage to at related fails poorly Site is Site to 1B. views Stage open at providing fails terms, Site landscape Valley. in linear Flit important a the is it and site making dipslope the instead important greensand this Maulden, these to of of addition character one In distinctive close settlement. the would and change site parts thus this distinct and of defining of gaps Development gaps consists character. landscape which rural important pattern distinct a with settlement two maintaining parts historical currently separate and are of distinctive what number a between following a has gap The Maulden important balance. Maulden. an planning of forms using parts it consideration identified; overall been an have on issues the based on 2 impact unique Stage unacceptable and at an distinctive Fail have is settlement. could which the development pattern of Maulden, settlement character of the pattern in envelopes. historical gap settlement mostly the a separate is to in distinctly site fill two This would between development. here lies for following Development and suitable The land not balance. agricultural is planning 2 site using Grade with This consideration development identified: overall for been an suitable have on buffer. is issues based a site the 2 as the Stage to acting of sensitive at SSSI portion be Fail the a to onto only need fronting that would portion likely site the is this settlement. it of from therefore Development detached and progress. and SSSI, to Maulden only to site related of poorly Portion is this Site address 1B. would Stage site at the fails of Site portion and a Ampthill only between forward Belt taking Green that in issue. with considered coalescence development not cause for is would suitable It Site buffer. is Maulden. 1B. a site the Stage as the to at acting of sensitive fails SSSI portion be Site the a to onto only need fronting that would portion likely site the is this it of have therefore Development which and progress. NLP276). site SSSI, to NLP270, this only (NLP087, of however site submissions portions may of under roadside frontage Portion considered but road being development, the are of of relationship scale Some unsustainable stronger smaller extension. a a logical constitute for a would suitable not site be is whole settlement. and the from Maulden of detached to Development and extension 1B. Cranfield Stage to at related fails poorly Site is Site 1B. Stage at fails Site

Justification NLP276 NLP270 NLP253 NLP233 Lane Moor off Land NLP131 NLP129 NLP087 NLP055 Road Cobbitts Maulden NLP053 Clophill at A507 off Land NLP016

ID (East) Rd Clophill of north Land (West) Rd Clophill of north Land Maulden Rd Silsoe fronting Land 382 053 TL Maulden Road, Cobbits at Land Close Gardeners of rear to Land Land End Green and Rd Clophill of corner at Land Lane Limbersey of south Land

Site Name Maulden Maulden Maulden Maulden Maulden Maulden Maulden Maulden Maulden

Parish Maulden Maulden Maulden Maulden Maulden Maulden Maulden Maulden Maulden isolated

Nearest Settlement Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not

Green Belt 0.96 1.18 0.94 1.71 2.33 4.48 0.39 3.38 1.32 0.75 Site Size (ha) ALP023 ALP023 NLP053 ALP409 ALP153 ALP151, NLP233

Overlapping Submissions oa lnprocess Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered will be site the of portion A Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site

Outcome ale odadtu eeoigete ieo hswudcag h hrce fthis of character the change to would gateway this a of forms side End is either Green which developing Maulden. pattern thus of settlement 2 and pattern the Grade Wood historical in is Maulden the gap site to a The unique in development. and fill for following distinctive would suitable The here not balance. Development is planning Land. site using Agricultural This consideration identified: overall been an is have on it issues based constraints 2 other Stage suitable. the impact at not with unacceptable Fail is combined an site when have the and still and that settlement could housing considered the development existing of but some density character site is low the the there some on of and is west road, there unique the the that and to of recognised distinctive employment side however is opposite is which the It pattern on Maulden. settlement village. development of the the pattern in within historical gap spaces the a farmed it to in of development, fill sequence linear would and within here enclosure space Development hedged open In the maintain farmed this to important earthworks. to important an archaeological addition is forms contains In site it land. the because agricultural terms terms 2 following landscape Archaeological Grade The in mostly balance. unsuitable is planning is site using site to This consideration related identified: overall well been an pattern. is have on settlement site issues based historic the sites 2 existing ensure which Stage the to site at alter help the Fail significantly would of not form portion does build the and the only Maulden of forward depth Taking existing further. the considered within be to portion a Only place. more this or in 10 settlement of the allocation the of an of nature for side the location opposite change appropriate the Wood. considerably an on Maulden would be development of which to density users dwellings considered low the not some for is is area either it there rural developing road, that this thus historical recognised of and the is character Wood to it the Maulden unique Whilst change to and would gateway distinctive this a is of forms which here side End pattern Development Green settlement land. Maulden. the agricultural of in 2 following pattern gap Grade The a mostly balance. in is planning fill site using flooding.would This consideration water identified: overall surface been an of have on risk issues based at 2 more Stage or at 50% Fail is Site 1A. Stage at fails Site at more or 50% is Site 3. and 2 Zones Flood within more flooding. or water 50% Sites surface is for of Site Call risk 1A. the Stage under at portion fails this Site the re-consider of a to development have need for would no permission process. is planning and there already settlement so is existing only portion there the of western d to development and related coalescence, impact well of ecological be danger small negative not at a would settlement lies portion the site eastern of the no the parts Though Ecologically, the woodland. north. in of the the role south disturbed to important distance which ridge an acceptable elevate plays in be the it important would from and is development views road site the the the in from this intrusion steeply to of avoiding rises addition parts land In separate the settlement. distinctive terms; linear two landscape a currently it are making what character. instead adjoin rural Maulden, would a site maintaining this and of parts Development distinct defining gaps landscape important

Justification L30Ln ato Ampthill of east Land NLP390 NLP377 NLP367 NLP342 Maulden Rd Silsoe of west Land NLP320 NLP289 NLP287

ID Maulden Rd Clophill of South Land Lane Abbey off Land Maulden Rd Clophill and Rd Silsoe between Land Rd Clophill of rear the to Land Rd Clophill of North and South the to Land

Site Name Maulden Maulden Maulden Maulden Maulden Maulden

Parish Ampthill Maulden Maulden Maulden Maulden Maulden

Nearest Settlement re Belt Green Belt Green Not Belt Green Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not

Green Belt 7.08 3.64 37 ALP053 33.70 1.39 3.68 3.05 0.44 Site Size (ha) N/A ALP415 ALP153 , ALP151

Overlapping Submissions oa lnprocess Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site N/A process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site

Outcome ale.I sntcniee httkn owr nyaprino h iewudadesthis address would site the of portion and a Ampthill only between forward Belt taking Green that in considered coalescence not cause is would ecology It Site of Maulden. 1B. terms Stage the in of at impact character fails positive and Site a density for has the suitable infrastructure. and with be green Clophill in-keeping would and and is it size Maulden that that the of dwellings unlikely to settlements more considered Due adjoining or is Importance. number 10 it Principle a or presented, of also development constraints Species are a the a There and potentially site. site’s site and the the the site to of of the adjacent two on roundabout alongside further trees large run addition mature a which in of at roads and intersect major 2/3 site that two Zones the and the Flood of borders by within capacity presented 40% The be being development. would it for following constraints by suitable The restricted not balance. severely is planning be site using would The consideration identified: overall been an have on issues based 2 Stage at Fail uses. leisure Sites proposes for Site Call assessed. the not under Site portion this the re-consider of a to development have need for would no permission process. is planning and there already settlement so is existing only portion there the of western d to development and related coalescence, impact well of ecological be danger small negative not at a would settlement lies portion the site eastern of the no the parts Though Ecologically, the woodland. north. in of the the role south disturbed to important distance which ridge an acceptable elevate plays in be the it important would from and is development views road site the the the in from this intrusion steeply to of avoiding rises addition parts land In separate the settlement. distinctive terms; linear two landscape a currently it are making what character. instead adjoin rural with Maulden, would a parts site maintaining separate this and of of parts number a Development distinct a has defining of Maulden an gaps consists Maulden. in landscape which of lies important pattern parts it settlement distinct because historical two development and currently for following distinctive are suitable The what not balance. between is planning gap site using important This consideration settlement. identified: overall from been an detached have on and issues based Maulden 2 to Stage related at poorly Fail is an Site as 1B. designated Stage is at road fails In the Site Area. to Conservation connects the which and site Buildings the Listed site. of of there employment portion setting and the the Church this on Maulden rises to impact to site addition wider views the a on because be intrude this of also would to character would development addition distinctive road, In the the settlement. change from linear thus steeply a and this it gaps of making important Development instead these character. Maulden, of rural important one a with close maintaining parts and would and separate distinctive site parts of a distinct number has defining a Maulden important gaps of Maulden. an landscape consists of forms which parts it pattern distinct development; settlement two for following historical currently suitable The are not balance. what is planning between site using gap This consideration identified: overall to been an views have on open issues based retained. provides 2 be particular Stage should in at which road Fail Valley Maulden In Flit of settlement. and south the Dipslope the of Greensand to character Maulden, land the of the on pattern terms, impact historical landscape unacceptable the the an to in two have unique gap between could and a lies development distinctive in and is fill land which would agricultural pattern here 2 following settlement Development Grade The envelopes. mostly balance. settlement is planning separate site using distinctly This consideration identified: overall an been an have forms on site issues based the 2 terms Stage development. landscape at linear In Fail within place. considerably space this would an open in which be farmed settlement dwellings to important the more considered low of or not some nature 10 is is the of it there change allocation road, that an the recognised for of is location side it appropriate opposite Whilst the Wood. on Maulden development of density users the for area rural

Justification L22SodnR Nurseries Rd Stondon NLP282 NLP237 NLP236 NLP235 NLP231 Park Wren NLP096 NLP095 Street High 100 NLP060 Nurseries Meppershall Close New NLP050 Road Shillington at Land ALP483 Nurseries Close New ALP473 Road Shefford at Land ALP373 Street High 4 at Land ALP281 Meadow Well Mary's St ALP280 ALP211 Road Shefford at Land ALP210 NLP445 NLP416

ID Nursery Bandland as known is proposal the of Part Meppershall Farm Chapel opposite Land Meppershall Rd Chapel of west the to Land Meppershall Coneygate, at Land House Stocken of rear to Land House Stocken of rear Land Maulden Rd, Ampthill of north Land Maulden Farm, End Duck at Land

Site Name Meppershall Meppershall Meppershall Meppershall Meppershall Meppershall Meppershall Meppershall Meppershall Meppershall Maulden Maulden Meppershall Meppershall Meppershall Meppershall Meppershall

Parish Meppershall Meppershall Meppershall Meppershall Meppershall Meppershall Meppershall Meppershall Meppershall Meppershall Meppershall Meppershall Meppershall Meppershall Meppershall Meppershall Maulden Maulden

Nearest Settlement Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Belt Green Not

Green Belt 0.33 2.32 7.68 0.80 8.44 2.65 1.97 3.04 3.82 8.30 0.40 1.10 7.68 1.60 0.54 1.19 0.51 0.60 Site Size (ha) ALP211 ALP473 NLP050 NLP095 ALP211 NLP095; ALP326

Overlapping Submissions ute spr fthe of part as further considered be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered will be site the of portion A

Outcome ftelse ulig n A.Test sas o elrltdt h village. the to related well setting not the also on is impact site its The to be due would SAM. concerns form and heritage built the buildings also so to listed are elevated integral the There is is of land land views. The the restrict village. as following and the landscape The intrusive of the balance. setting on planning and impact using landscape its consideration farmed due overall identified: an been on have based Meppershall. issues 2 with Stage relationship at poor fails a Site has Site site. the 1B. for Stage aspirations at GI the Failed and to a provides due forms site concerns site the ecological the that development; as following habitat existing landscape The diverse to the balance. screening on planning providing impact using feature detrimental consideration key access; overall identified: an been on have based issues 2 Stage at fails Site access. for building a a regarding demolishing concerns following on noise The concerns pattern, balance. heritage settlement planning and the using dryer on consideration grain impact overall allocation. has identified; an for already been on eligible site have based not the issues 2 site. is because Stage the therefore available developing at and be fails use to on Site proposed considered intent the not are for is owners was permission Site land form planning 1D. the submission Stage no at if because fails clear available Site not considered allocation. has is not for already it is eligible site and Site not the submitted 1D. is because Stage therefore available at and be fails use to Site proposed considered the not ecological for is also permission Site are planning 1D. There Stage terms. landscape. it at ecological open as fails in its landscape Site site to the the due on developing village impact following with the detrimental The concerns to a balance. setting have planning rural will using a site consideration forms The overall identified: an been on more. have based or issues 2 dwellings Stage ten at accommodate fails not Site listed would the Site of 1A. setting Stage the at and fails Meppershall Site to related barrier. well a not as is acts Site church 1B. Stage at fails Site this address would site the of portion and a Ampthill only between forward Belt taking Green that in issue. considered coalescence not cause is would mitigate It Site and Maulden. 1B. impact appropriate. Stage landscape more at the be fails reduce may Site would site site the concerns. the of ecological of portion on against portion roadside constraints a smaller ecology only a and forward that landscape Taking considered the a Considering is progress. it to site, only site the of Portion issue.

Justification NLP286 NLP166 NLP159 ALP476 ALP475 ALP461 Road Bedford at Land ALP180 ALP127 ALP121 Farm Gabels White ALP120 ALP119 Road Bedford at Land ALP018 3 Farm Leys ALP337 2 Farm Leys ALP336 1 Farm Leys ALP335 Grove Russell at Land NLP196 NLP195 NLP169 NLP118 Farm Bury at Land NLP313 Meppershall Meppershall Rd Shefford NLP283

ID BdodR (A603) Rd /Bedford Rd Park to adj Land Extension Park Business Ridgeway Road, Park of north Land B) (Site Nursery Chalkcroft and Asterby A) (Site Nursery Chalkcroft and Asterby Blunham and Chalton between Land Chalton Road, Blunham (evens), 22-32A of rear Land Road Blunham of south Land Chalton Road, Blunham 95 Millbrook at Land Millbrook Farm, Warren at Land Close Sandhill 12 and Grove Russell 1 between Land

Site Name ogragrChalton Moggerhanger Chalton Moggerhanger Chalton Moggerhanger Chalton Belt Green Moggerhanger Moggerhanger Belt Bryan Green Milton Moggerhanger Belt Bryan Bryan Green Milton Bryan Milton Milton Bryan Milton Millbrook Millbrook Millbrook Millbrook Meppershall ogragrMoggerhanger Moggerhanger Moggerhanger Moggerhanger Moggerhanger Chalton Moggerhanger Chalton Moggerhanger Blunham Moggerhanger Moggerhanger Moggerhanger

Parish Standalone Millbrook Millbrook Millbrook Meppershall Meppershall

Nearest Settlement Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not

Green Belt 0.38 4.33 2.66 0.59 0.42 5.64 4.71 5.92 1.88 0.86 0.74 26.33 3.57 0.49 1.95 0.99 0.41 12.72 1.08 1.21 1.00 Site Size (ha) ALP180 N/A NLP305 NLP286 ALP461 N/A

Overlapping Submissions oa Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site N/A Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site N/A process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site Plan. Local

Outcome ientasse.St rpssepomn uses. employment proposes Site assessed. not Site would it as Chalton to extension logical way. a unsustainable represent would an not it in does as settlement site Chalton the The to extend 1B. extension Stage logical at way. a fails unsustainable represent Stage settlement. an not the in does from settlement site detached the The and extend 1B. Blunham Stage to at related fails poorly Stage is Site 1B. Stage at fails Site would it as Chalton to extension logical way. a unsustainable represent an not in does would settlement site it the The as extend 1B. Chalton Stage to at extension fails logical Stage way. a unsustainable represent would an not it in does as settlement site Chalton the The to extend 1B. extension Stage logical at way. a fails unsustainable represent Stage settlement. an not the in does from settlement site detached the The and extend 1B. Chalton Stage to at related fails poorly Stage is Site 1B. the Stage from at detached fails and Site Moggerhanger to related poorly is Site Bryan settlement. 1B. Milton Stage to at related fails poorly Site is site The 1B. Bryan at Milton fails to Site related poorly is site The 1B. Bryan at Milton fails to Site related poorly is site church. The listed 1B. of at setting fails wider greensand Site following within elevated The site to as due balance. issues landscape planning heritage impact using and would consideration landscape Site overall identified: an been on have based issues 2 Stage at fails Site uses. employment are proposes there Site and assessed. settlement not existing Site any following site. to The the related balance. developing well planning with not using issues is consideration landscape site overall identified: an been on have based reptiles.. ecological issues 2 for and Stage habitat church at good listed fails a of Site being setting NIA wider greensand following the within elevated The with site to issues as due balance. issues landscape planning heritage impact using and would consideration landscape Site overall identified: an been on have based issues 2 Stage at fails Site

Justification L26TePaddock The NLP206 Park Caravan Woodside Northill NLP205 Rd Biggleswade off Land Northill NLP065 Lane Sand Paddock, The NLP003 Road Bedford 29 ALP428 Northill at Site ALP399 Pound the at Land ALP398 Road Hitchin at Land ALP397 Lane Water at Land ALP396 ALP358 ALP357 ALP248 ALP218 ALP141 ALP124 North Woodlands ALP122 ALP035 ALP034 NLP511 Ridgeway The NLP474 NLP305

ID Biggleswade House, Brook Bells of rear to Land Biggleswade Park, Lorry Brook Bells Road Bedford of side east north the on Land Junction Road Hatch Road/ Thorncote at Land Caldecote Upper Road, Biggleswade 82-88 of south Land Rowletts & House Woodlands Almshouses of rear the to Land Caldecote Upper Road, Biggleswade 67-103 of rear Land Moggerhanger Rd, Bedford at Land Moggerhanger Rd, Park of east Land

Site Name Northill Northill Northill Northill Northill Northill Northill Northill Northill Northill Northill Moggerhanger Moggerhanger Blunham Moggerhanger Moggerhanger Moggerhanger Northill Northill Northill Northill

Parish Hatch Hatch Caldecote Upper Northill Northill Caldecote Upper Caldecote Upper Caldecote Upper Biggleswade Biggleswade Northill Hatch Caldecote Upper Caldecote Upper Caldecote Upper Caldecote Upper Caldecote Upper

Nearest Settlement Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not

Green Belt 2.11 0.57 0.76 1.94 2.90 11.44 9.84 1.88 0.27 6.20 1.64 2.25 2.50 0.34 4.90 6.23 2.61 1.90 1.54 0.72 0.53 Site Size (ha) NLP478 NLP477 N/A NLP350 NLP159

Overlapping Submissions oa lnprocess Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered will be site the of portion A process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site N/A process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site

Outcome iefisa tg A iewudntacmoaetndelnso more. or dwellings ten accommodate not 3. would and Site 2 1A. Zones Stage Flood at within fails more Site or 50% is Site 1A. Stage at fails Site settlement. the from detached and Northill to related poorly settlement. is the Site from 1B. detached Stage and at Northill fails to Site related poorly is Site 1B. more. Stage or at dwellings fails ten Site accommodate not would Site 1A. Stage at site full fails the Site impact settlement. the the of of because character consideration the further on warrants have located site would birds this / of bats portion for a foraging Only as used not grassland site soil. open Caldecote; 1 its Upper Grade to with on due relationship following terms poor The ecological a balance. in has planning suitable site using identified: consideration been overall have an issues on based 2 Stage Failed 3. and 2 Zones Flood within more or 50% is Site 1A. Stage at fails Site uses. allocation. has employment for already proposes eligible site Site not the assessed. is because not therefore available Site and be use to 3. proposed considered and the not 2 for is Zones permission Site Flood planning 1D. within Stage more at or fails 50% Site is Site not 1A. could Stage which at issue fails ownership Site land on or provided legal information a the overcome. is because be there available realistically that considered indicates not form is submission Site the 1D. Northill Stage to at related fails poorly Site is Site 1B. Stage at Northill fails to Site related poorly is of Site setting 1B. the Stage to at due fails landscape Site site. on following the impact The of and balance. visibility site; planning and the using almshouses to consideration the access overall identified; an an been on have have based would issues 2 it potential Stage site the at the is fails pattern. of there Site settlement nature as the back-land ecology on the on following impact Given impact The adverse and balance. importance. site; planning principle the using of to consideration habitat access overall settlement. identified; an from been on detached have based and issues 2 Moggerhanger Stage to at related fails a poorly Site of is not Site is 1B. and Stage settlements at existing fails any Site to related alone. well stand not to is scale Site sufficient 1B. Stage at fails Site

Justification L046 igewd Road Biggleswade 64 ALP024 Road Sandy at Land ALP017 NLP515 NLP514 NLP513 NLP512 Graces NLP479 NLP478 Lane Water NLP477 NLP441 NLP431 NLP350 A1 to adjacent Land NLP332 NLP308 NLP263 NLP216 NLP207

ID efr d l Warden Old Rd, Bedford Crescent, Richard's and Lodge The between Land Caldecote Upper Lane, Hill Quarry, Broom at Land Caldecote Upper Lane, Hill Quarry, Broom at Land Caldecote Upper Farm, Kingshill at Land Caldecote Upper Pound, The Caldecote Lower Lane, Grange at Land Caldecote Upper Road, Biggleswade of south Land Rd Bedford of side East North on Land Rd Caldecote from accessed Land Rd Biggleswade of south Land Hatch Rd, Thorncote at Land Field) (Close Northill Rd Thorncote at Land

Site Name l Warden Old Warden Old Northill Northill Northill Northill Northill Northill Northill Northill Northill Northill Northill Potton Potton Warden Old

Parish Potton Potton Warden Old Caldecote Upper Caldecote Upper Caldecote Upper Caldecote Upper Caldecote Upper Caldecote Upper Caldecote Upper Northill Biggleswade Green Caldecote Upper Hatch Northill

Nearest Settlement Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not

Green Belt 0.30 6.78 0.54 16.83 10.87 8.78 0.74 0.86 1.00 NLP186 15.57 1.10 7.63 9.10 8.16 0.98 3.31 1.75 Site Size (ha) ALP398 ALP396 NLP263 ALP248 NLP431

Overlapping Submissions oa lnprocess Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered will be site the of portion A process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered will be site the of portion A process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site

Outcome ieFisSae1.St osntrpeetalgcletnint otna twudextend would it as Potton to extension agricultural way. logical 2 unsustainable a Grade an represent is in not site settlement does the the Site of 1B. portion Stage Area.. large Fails the Safeguarding a Site whilst Minerals addition, mammals a In and within reptiles spatial and birds. of the land farmland records forming to are terms, value there landscape has and in site Deepdale role and important and Potton an patterns between plays settlement gap site historical logical spatial The the a the Potton. change present maintained of considerably not that character would does site and site the Potton the of to because portion extension Deepdale a and forward Potton take Deepdale. between to and and separation appropriate Potton Deepdale be between between not coalescence gap would cause spatial following It potentially important The could an balance. development forms planning and site using Potton, This consideration identified: overall listed been an II* have on Grade issues based and 2 Monument Stage Scheduled heritage at the and Fail to archaeological proximity are the its there to to and due building. due Park landscape site the the following the to on The with setting impact issues the adverse balance. forming an planning land have using open would consideration elevated site overall a identified: an of been on have not based issues is 2 and Stage settlements at existing fails any Site to related alone. well stand not to is scale a Site sufficient of 1B. not Stage is at and fails settlements Site existing any to related alone. well a stand not of to is not scale Site is sufficient 1B. and Stage settlements at existing fails any Site to issue. the related this from alone. well address detached stand not would is to is portion and scale Site a Caldecote sufficient 1B. only Upper Stage forward the at taking to fails that related Site considered well not not is is it Site settlement. site 1B. full Stage the at impact fails settlement. the Site the of of because character consideration the further on warrants allocation. has have site for already would this eligible site of not the portion is because a therefore available Only and be use to proposed considered the not for is more. permission Site or planning 1D. dwellings Stage ten at accommodate fails not Site would Site 1A. Stage the at from fails detached Site is and Caldecote Upper to related poorly allocation. has is for already settlement. Site eligible site 1B. not the Stage is because at therefore available Failed and be use to proposed considered A1) the not by for is (separated permission Site Biggleswade planning 1D. both Stage with at relationship fails poor Site a has Caldecote. site site. the Upper The the on and of impact 1B. scale its Stage of and at terms NIA landscapeFailed in the the village on on the impact impact of its adverse following character dipslope; an The Greensand have balance. the would planning of site using characteristic the consideration identified: overall been an have on issues site based full 2 the Stage impact at settlement. the Failed the of of because character consideration the further on warrants have site would this more. of or portion dwellings a ten Only accommodate not would Site 1A. Stage at fails Site

Justification NLP186 NLP170 NLP157 Farm Jay NLP130 Potton Paddocks, The NLP112 Farm Jay NLP098 NLP042 Road Everton NLP006 Road Sutton 6b ALP465 ALP458 Road Bedford Potton Old ALP453 Road Gamlingay at Land ALP381 ALP223 ALP220 Road Sandy of north Land ALP217 Road Sutton off Land ALP199 ALP096 ALP095 Road Everton at Land ALP045

ID Potton Rd, Sandy of north Land Potton Rd Everton off Land Potton Rd of Gamlingay side west the on Land cemetery the side of and back the to Land Cemetery Potton to adjacent Land Road Biggleswade 42 of rear Land Road Everton of south Land Close Sheepwalk of south the to Land Myers Road of north the to Land

Site Name Potton Potton Potton Potton Potton Potton Potton Potton Potton Potton Potton Potton Potton Potton Potton Potton Potton Potton

Parish Potton Potton Potton Potton Potton Potton Potton Potton Potton Potton Potton Potton Potton Potton Potton Potton Potton Potton Potton

Nearest Settlement Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not

Green Belt 2.57 8.09 1.11 2.17 0.10 55 ALP017 15.56 1.05 2.20 3.96 4.29 3.58 2.50 0.37 4.16 3.67 3.48 1.41 1.14 0.58 Site Size (ha) ALP381 ALP199 NLP330 NLP186 ALP465

Overlapping Submissions oa lnprocess Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site

Outcome eaainbtenPto n epaebcuetest osntpeetalogical spatial a the present maintained not that does site site the the of because portion Deepdale a and forward Potton take Deepdale. between to and and separation appropriate Potton Deepdale be between between not coalescence gap would cause spatial following It potentially important The could an balance. development forms planning and site using Potton, This consideration identified: overall been an have on issues based 2 Stage at Fail extend would it as Potton to extension way. logical unsustainable a settlement. an represent the in not from settlement does detached the Site and 1B. Potton Stage to Fails related Site poorly an is in Site settlement 1B. the Stage extends Fails and Site Potton to related settlement. poorly the is from way. Site detached unsustainable 1B, and Stage Potton at to Fails related Site poorly extend is would Site it 1B. as Stage Potton Fails to Site extension way. logical unsustainable a allocation. have an represent for already in not eligible site settlement does not the the Site is because 1B. therefore available Stage and be Fails use to Site proposed considered the not for is permission Site planning 1D. Stage at Fails Site allocation. has for already eligible site not the is because therefore available and be use to proposed considered settlement. the not the for is from permission Site detached planning 1D. and Stage Potton at to fails related Site poorly extend is would Site it 1B. as Stage Potton Fails to Site extension way. logical unsustainable a extend an represent would in not it settlement does as the Site Potton 1B. to Stage extension Fails way. logical Site unsustainable a settlement. an represent the in not from settlement does detached the Site and 1B. Potton Stage to Fails related Site poorly is Site 1B. Stage Fails Site for submission this and further. forward, for considered taken is suitable not is it be is ALP465 Therefore would site as buffering. site wider submitted for the the parcel used of the being portion only land northern the that remaining the on proposed the only Infrastructure with that Green allocation, suggested the residential is to slopes. a it buffering lower suggests site, and of also the mitigation character is of landscape wetland It south for the here. need reinforce Infrastructure the to Green to used the extensive Due is protect be is mitigation to to this landscape site, need rather some the also allocation that of would prevent south There would the design. this foraging to through that of buffering addressed considered terms be not in could is value that it ecological following something but potential The mammals, has balance. and does planning birds site using 3. for This consideration and identified: overall 2 been an Zones have on Flood issues based within 2 more Stage or at 50% Fail is settlement. Site the 1A. from Stage detached at and fails Potton Site to related poorly is Site more. 1B. or Stage dwellings Fails ten Site accommodate not would Site 1A. Stage at fails Site

Justification L33Hn otField Post Hand NLP353 Rd Greenfield off Land NLP335 Street High 19a NLP051 at Land Pulloxhill ALP391 Lane Tyburn of west Land ALP292 Street High 19A ALP172 Lane Blackhill at Land ALP061 Pulloxhill Lane Tyburn of west Land ALP060 NLP421 NLP398 NLP347 NLP330 Potton Lane Mill off Land NLP290 Potton Hill Bury at Land NLP214

ID Potton Hill, Bury of north Land Potton Farm, Jays to adj Land Rd Everton of rear at Land Potton Rd Sandy of south the to Land

Site Name Pulloxhill Pulloxhill Potton Potton Potton Potton Potton Pulloxhill Pulloxhill Pulloxhill Pulloxhill

Parish Greenfield and Flitton Pulloxhill Pulloxhill Pulloxhill Pulloxhill Pulloxhill Pulloxhill Pulloxhill Potton Potton Potton Potton Potton Potton

Nearest Settlement Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not

Green Belt 11.16 2.46 2.64 3.77 3.28 2.07 3.69 0.99 1.12 7.42 1.54 0.52 0.84 0.67 Site Size (ha) ALP172 NLP051 N/A ALP458

Overlapping Submissions ato h oa Plan. Local the of part as further considered will be site the of portion A Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered will be site the of portion A Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site

Outcome iiigti iet oto loealsmtgto o h adcp ocrsraised. concerns landscape the for consideration. mitigation further enables for also site portion the is the a of it to to portion Therefore related site a related. well this forward poorly is Limiting take is site only site the to the of appropriate of portion considered portion eastern western the the Although development, progress. existing to only site of Portion habitat. existing the to buffering improved for within need also any a is that is site ensuring there The thus and important. and land is area Agricultural character conservation 2 existing the context Grade the to the to setting in sympathetic the relevant is of particularly development part is would forms This which site Pulloxhill. development the of back-land that pattern related as settlement poorly development, historic a for the constitute suitable following change would considered The site not balance. this is planning issue. of site using this development is This consideration address It identified: overall would settlement. been an site the have on the from issues based of detached 2 portion and Stage a Pulloxhill at only to Fail forward related taking poorly that is considered Site not 1B. Stage at fails Site within also any is that site ensuring The thus important. and land. is area Agricultural character conservation 2 existing the context Grade the to the to setting in sympathetic the relevant is of particularly development part is would forms This which site Pulloxhill. development the of back-land that pattern related as settlement poorly development, historic a for the constitute suitable following change would considered The site not balance. this is planning of site using development This consideration identified: overall the been an to have on issues related based well 2 is Stage which at site Fail the further. of considered portion be the will Only envelope progress. settlement to only site of Portion of settlement existing In the to church. relationship listed strong I a Grade have the site not of sensitive does setting very Potton. site the a the on is highly this impact it a to negative church, forms addition a landmark it have the because would and development development town for following and the suitable The between not balance. space is planning open site using distinctive This consideration extend identified: overall would been an it have on as issues based Potton 2 to Stage extension at way. logical Fail unsustainable a an represent in not settlement does the Site 1B. Stage Fails Site allocation. has for already eligible site not the is because therefore available and be use to proposed considered allocation. has the not for already for is eligible site permission Site not the planning 1D. is because Stage therefore available at and be fails use to Site 3. proposed considered and the not 2 for is Zones permission Site Flood planning 1D. within Stage more at or fails agricultural 50% Site 2 is Grade Site is 1A. site Stage the at of fails portion Site Area. large the Safeguarding a whilst Minerals addition, mammals a In and within reptiles spatial and birds. of the land farmland records forming to are terms, value there landscape has and in site Deepdale role and important and Potton an patterns between plays settlement gap site historical The the Potton. change of considerably character would and Potton to extension

Justification NLP248 Farm Popes at Land NLP209 Fields Blunham NLP208 NLP084 NLP077 Yard Timber Beeston ALP431 End/Girtford Hamlet ALP419 Sandy of South Land ALP408 Farm Hall at Land ALP384 ALP375 ALP320 ALP319 ALP294 Beeston of North Land Sandy ALP219 Line Railway of East Land ALP133 ALP076 Ridgmont NLP504 Lane1, Cobbers at Land NLP503 NLP244 Ridgmont at Land NLP064 Ridgmont at Land ALP331 NLP523

ID ae Sandy Lane, Sandy of North and Line Railway the of East Land Road Sunderland of North Land Sandy/Swaden Rd, Potton of North Land A1 the off Land B) (Option Sandy of North Land A) (Option Sandy of North Land Road Tempsford of East Land High Road 9b of rear to Land (2) Lane Cobbers at Land Ridgmont at Land Barton A6 Cottage Todd Near

Site Name Sandy Sandy Sandy Sandy Sandy Sandy Sandy Sandy Ridgmont Ridgmont Ridgmont Ridgmont Pulloxhill Sandy Sandy Sandy Sandy Sandy Sandy Sandy

Parish Sandy Sandy Sandy Sandy Sandy Beeston Sandy Sandy Hatch Sandy Sandy Sandy Sandy Beeston Sandy Sandy None Ridgmont Standalone Ridgmont Ridgmont Clay Le Barton

Nearest Settlement Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Not Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Not

Green Belt 8.57 NLP248 24.14 0.81 16.46 0.41 42.95 4.19 4.40 1.22 10 ALP133 31.00 1.09 1.37 22.38 6.04 3.79 29.78 6.96 0.40 53.65 8.96 21.76 17.15 Site Size (ha) NLP264 NLP264 NLP414 ALP319, ALP320, ALP264 ALP294, ALP320, NLP084, NLP414, NLP414 ALP375, ALP319, ALP375 NLP414, NLP084, ALP320, N/A N/A

Overlapping Submissions oa lnprocess Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered will be site the of portion A process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site N/A Plan. Local the of part as further considered will be site the of portion A Plan. Local the of part as further considered will be site the of portion A process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site N/A process Plan Local from excluded be to Site N/A process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site

Outcome al tg B iei oryrltdt eteet ala ieat sabarrier. a as acts Line Railway settlement, to related poorly is barrier Site a 1B. as Stage acts Fails A1 Sandy, to related 3. poorly and is 2 Site Zones 1B. Flood Stage within Fails more Site or 50% is Site 1A. Stage far at too fails settlement remain Site the to extending site not this whilst for sandy, necessary of is barrier.northwards. pattern portion a existing linear as the A acts to progress. line complimentary to Railway only settlement, site to of related Portion poorly is Site could 1B. A1. that Stage the requirements Fails from infrastructure access critical 3. unsafe the and to provide 2 due cannot Zones delivery site Flood enable The within 1C, more Stage or at 50% Fails 3. is and Site 2 1A. Zones Stage Flood at within fails more Site or 50% is extend Site would 1A. it Stage as at Hatch fails to Site extension way. logical unsustainable a an represent in not settlement does the Site 1B. Stage Fails Site uses. employment proposes Site assessed. not Site far too Sandy extend not does existing that the extension to logical adjacent a site, provide the to of northwards. order boundary in southern Sandy the of far along settlement too necessary Sandy be extend would not portion does existingA that the extension to logical adjacent a site, provide the to of northwards. order boundary in southern 3. Sandy the and of along 2 settlement necessary Zones be Flood would within portion more A or 50% is Site 1A. Stage could at A1. that fails the requirements Site barrier. from infrastructure a access critical as unsafe the acts to provide Sandy due cannot in delivery site line enable The railway 1C, sandy, Stage to at related Fails 3. poorly and is 2 Site Zones 1B. Flood Stage within at more Fails or 50% is Site 1A. Stage at fails Site not is uses. It employment settlement. proposes issue. any Site this to assessed. address related not would well Site portion not a and only isolated forward is taking site that the considered 1B, Stage at fails Site issue. uses. this settlement. employment address the proposes would from Site portion detached assessed. a and not only Ridgmont Site forward to circumstances. taking related exceptional that poorly for Belt. considered is considered Green not a site be wider is as the to the It identified 1B, criteria to been Stage fulfil contribution not at not no has fails does or and Site it weak Belt this weak, Green to relatively the addition a in In site only located the making is of is site portion that a The a parcel of 1E. only not Stage forward is at taking and fails that settlements Site considered existing issue. not any this is to address It related would alone. well stand not to is scale Site sufficient 1B. Stage at fails Site

Justification L15Ln oteSuhof South the to Land NLP155 NLP141 NLP137 NLP135 NLP009 Site Laundry Old Shefford The ALP407 (2) Farm Shefford Bridge at Land ALP274 (1) Farm Bridge at Land ALP273 ALP145 Road Campton at Land ALP130 ALP039 Swaden H170 NLP497 NLP461 Sandy of North Land NLP414 NLP399 Sandy Road New at Land NLP369 Swaden H169 NLP365 Sandy of West Land NLP328 Baulk the at Land NLP319 NLP264 NLP249

ID Shefford Depot Hillfoot at Land Shefford Farm Bridge of east and Rd Hitchin of west Land Shefford Rd Hitchin of west Land (west) Shefford Road, Hitchin at Land Wharf Northbridge off Land Road Ampthill 24a of rear to Land Sandy Close Beamish of North and Rd Middlefield of east Land Sandy Beeston, at Land Farm Popes to Adjacent Land Close Beamish of North Land

Site Name Shefford Shefford Shefford Shefford Sandy Sandy Sandy Sandy Sandy Sandy Sandy Sandy Sandy Sandy Shefford Shefford Shefford Shefford Shefford

Parish Shefford Shefford Shefford Shefford Shefford Shefford Shefford Shefford Shefford Shefford Shefford Sandy Sandy Sandy Beeston Sandy Sandy Sandy Beeston Sandy Sandy

Nearest Settlement o re 4.60 Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not

Green Belt 60.46 14.11 0.47 1.09 ALP419 23.82 3.55 28.00 NLP461 13.40 1.33 5.90 8.02 4.38 1.24 1.95 1.45 0.30 8.04 0.38 1.32 17.66 Site Size (ha) L39St ob xlddfo al tSae2bsdo noealcnieainuigpann aac.Tefollowing The balance. planning using consideration overall an on based 2 Stage at Fails from excluded be to Site NLP389 NLP135 NLP137 ALP273 ALP274 N/A ALP320 ALP319, NLP084, ALP375, NLP452, N/A ALP294 ALP375,

Overlapping Submissions oa lnprocess Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site N/A Plan. Local the of part as further considered will be site the of portion A N/A process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site

Outcome iefisa tg B h iei oryrltdt hfodaddtce rmtesettlement. the from detached and Shefford to related poorly is site The Hitchin 1B. fronting Stage land at of fails In portion constrained. Site narrow is a Road to Hitchin although limited to and be area field would this agricultural Road. access from an the access by to access, Shefford east relationship of adjoins the and terms west in access the Shefford to to from relation area separated in following the is being The site issue balance. The main planning the using Shefford. consideration the identified: overall constrained. to been an is area have on Road the issues based Hitchin although site 2 to and The Stage area field at this agricultural Shefford. Fails from an to access by relationship Shefford east sites adjoins the the following west in being The Shefford issue balance. from main planning separated settlement. the using is the consideration from identified: overall detached been an and have on Shefford issues based to 2 related Stage poorly at is Fails site The 1B. Stage at fails Site allocation. has for already eligible site not the is because therefore available and be use to proposed considered allocation. has the not for already for is eligible site permission Site not the planning 1D. is because Stage therefore available at and be fails use to Site proposed considered or the not 50% for is is permission Site Site planning 1D. more. Stage or at 3. dwellings fails and ten Site 2 accommodate allocation. has Zones not for already Flood would eligible site within Site not the more 1A. is because Stage therefore available at and be fails use to Site 3. proposed considered and the not 2 for is Zones permission Site Flood planning 1D. within Stage more at or fails 50% Site is settlement. Site the 1A. from Stage detached at and fails Sandy Site to related poorly is Site 1B. Stage Fails Site uses. employment proposes Site assessed. not Site far too Sandy extend not does existing that the extension to logical adjacent a site, provide the to of northwards. order boundary in southern Sandy the of along settlement necessary be would portion A uses. extend employment would proposes it Site as assessed. Sandy not to Site extension way. logical unsustainable a barrier an represent a in not as settlement does acts the Site Railway 1B. Sandy, Stage to Fails related Site 3. poorly and is 2 Site Zones 1B. Flood Stage within Fails more Site or 50% is Site 1A. Stage could at A1. that fails the requirements Site from infrastructure access critical unsafe the to provide due cannot delivery site enable The barrier 1C a Stage is at A1 Fails settlement, to related Poorly 1B. Stage Fails

Justification L31Ln f Brookside off Land ALP351 Road High off Land ALP277 ALP276 Walk New off Land ALP275 ALP167 ALP166 ALP100 Shillington Road End Aspley at Land ALP062 ALP025 NLP501 Close Hazel off Land NLP460 NLP389 Field Line NLP373 NLP355

ID ws fteChurch) the of (west Road Hillside at Land Road High of east and south the to Land New Walk of north the to Land Road High 141 to adjacent Land Road End Hanscombe 48 and 30 between Land Beadlow Rd Shefford Shefford Road, Stanford at Land Shefford Rd, Bedford at Land Shefford Rd Stanford

Site Name Shillington Shillington Shillington Shillington Shefford Shefford Shefford Shefford Shefford Shillington Shillington Shillington Shillington

Parish Shillington Shillington Shillington Shillington Shillington Shillington Shillington Shillington Shillington Shefford Shefford Shefford Shefford

Nearest Settlement Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt

Green Belt 1.12 0.98 4.60 9.20 10.95 0.44 0.77 3.34 4.44 2.33 4.50 0.72 0.71 0.62 Site Size (ha) NLP252 ALP404, NLP243 ALP402, ALP166, NLP188 NLP243 ALP402, N/A NLP155

Overlapping Submissions oa lnprocess Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site N/A process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered will be site the of portion A process Plan Local

Outcome iefisa tg A iewudntacmoaetndelnso more. or dwellings ten accommodate not would Site 1A. Stage be at cannot fails facility. site Site community the this the Furthermore; therefore of policy. and removal specific site the site the of without a of loss developed through confines the mitigated the in be within result cannot re-provided would following impact be site The cannot the balance. that of planning facility development using community The consideration important identified: overall requirements. an been an to of have on surplus loss issues based be the I 2 to in Grade Stage considered result a at not also of Fail are would setting that whole the (allotments) in to space site harm open this cause and to of would character failing Development and the and Building. generally to , the Listed more harm of in area cause appearance result the Area, and of Conservation character would appearance Shillington the part the to in enhance harm or and cause whole following conserve landscape, in The valued site balance. a this planning of of using loss Development consideration identified: overall been an have on issues based 2 Stage at Fail harm cause likely would area. and the inappropriate of be appearance would and site development character the a open the within that the to dwellings considered within a 10 is located of than It being setting more envelopes. as the of settlement well within defined as and from Building Area detached Listed Conservation following countryside, II* a The Grade within balance. and is planning Monument site using Scheduled The consideration identified: overall been an have on issues based 2 Stage at Fail allocation. has for already eligible site not the is because therefore available and be use to proposed considered the not for is permission Site planning 1D. Stage at fails Site 3. accommodation. and G&T 2 proposes Zones Site Flood assessed. within not more Site here. or Shefford 50% of is nature Site rural 1A. more Stage the buildings at on dispersed fails and impact has Site River an area Ivel have this the would settlement, by here Shefford south development adjoins the the thus west in on and the Shefford impact to from and area separated relationship the is sites following although site the The The being balance. Shefford. issue planning of main using character the consideration identified: overall been an have on issues based 2 Stage at Fails considered this is as portion site section. smaller the southern A of the Ridge. part on Greensand northern to only the the site suitable of in the more landscape landscape of dipslope over relationship here. the concerns the Shefford forms and over of area size concerns nature its are rural to There more due progress. the buildings Shefford to on dispersed only and impact has site River an area Ivel of have this the Portion would settlement, by here Shefford south development adjoins the the thus west in on and the Shefford impact to from and area separated relationship the is sites although site the The being Shefford. issue of main character the identified: been have issues

Justification L14Ln ato ihSre Silsoe Street High of east Land ALP104 ALP063 Rd, Bury off Land NLP524 NLP423 Road Hillfoot at Land NLP395 Land Church NLP252 NLP243 Rd High of east Land NLP241 NLP188 NLP133 Hillside at Land ALP404 Hill Marquis at Land ALP403 Walk New at Land ALP402

ID ebr Lane Newbury 16-36 or rear Land Shillington Road, End Handscombe Farm, Archers at Land Walk New at Land Gables, The Garage Dawes of north Land Shillington Rd Bury off Land

Site Name Shillington Shillington Shillington Shillington Shillington Shillington Shillington Shillington Shillington Silsoe Shillington Shillington

Parish Silsoe Silsoe Shillington Shillington Shillington Shillington Shillington Shillington Shillington Shillington Shillington Shillington Shillington

Nearest Settlement Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not

Green Belt 2.67 2.66 0.39 5.81 3.34 1.18 2.80 3.31 1.67 5.90 5.80 5.20 1.18 Site Size (ha) ALP235 NLP113, ALP166 , ALP402 NLP252 ALP276, NLP243 ALP166,

Overlapping Submissions oa lnprocess Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site

Outcome sushv enietfe:Test ol matuo h ua n pncaatrand character open and rural the upon following impact The would balance. site planning The using consideration allocation. has identified: overall for already been an eligible site have on not the issues based is because 2 therefore available Stage and be at use to Fail proposed considered the not for is permission Site area. planning 1D. the value, Stage of amenity at appearance its fails and includes Site character which varied the landscape the to wider enhancing unacceptably harm the nor would causing of conserving part quality neither in or landscape, or character this whole following countryside of in The setting site balance. rural this planning the of using erode Development consideration identified: an overall been in an have be on issues to based considered 2 and Stage settlement at the Fail from detached is site The location. isolated 1B. appearance Stage location. and at settlement character area fails of the the Site edge enhance of this or character at preserve on Area either impact space Conservation to harmful open the fail a valued of would have of and would area amenity that an local form of its and built loss and of the location open introduction in countryside the the result open within and settlement, its is existing of and the virtue area with by conservation following relationship site, the The this within balance. of is planning Development site using countryside. The consideration identified: overall been an the have on and issues based setting 2 landscape Stage Buildings. historic adverse at Listed an an Fail of within has setting site it the exposed Shillington; on its with following impact to relationship The due poor balance. landscape a planning on has using impact site consideration identified: overall been an have on issues based 2 Stage at Failed adverse an have would it as suitable considered following pattern. not The settlement is balance. the site planning on The using impact consideration identified: overall been an have on issues based 2 Stage at Fail area. the of amenity appearance its and includes character which the landscape the to wider enhancing harm the nor causing of conserving value, quality neither or landscape, would cause character this site countryside of the would varied setting Furthermore part rural ends'. in the its or erode of whole following unacceptably one in The and site balance. Shillington this planning between of using coalescence Development consideration important identified: overall requirements. an been an to of have on surplus loss issues based be the I 2 to in Grade Stage considered result a at not also of Fail are would setting that whole the (allotments) in to space site harm open this cause and to of would character failing Development and the and Building. generally to , the Listed more harm of in area cause appearance result the Area, and of Conservation character would appearance Shillington the part the to in enhance harm or and cause whole following conserve landscape, in The valued site balance. a this planning of of using loss Development consideration identified: overall been an could have on landscape issues based landscaping. the 2 soft upon the Stage through development of at degree the openness Fail acceptable of the an impact and to the site settlement mitigated that the the be considered of of not topography character is the the of it to and appearance landscape due countryside and setting, the character its of the includes openness to following which the harm The includes cause balance. which would planning area, site using the The consideration identified: overall been an have on issues based 2 Stage at Fail

Justification L10PeedlFarm Prebendal ALP110 ALP069 NLP491 NLP490 NLP388 NLP385 NLP185 NLP113 Tranquilla NLP109 Cottages Lake Todd NLP004 Bungalow The ALP462 ALP235 ALP165

ID e Street New and Street Front at Land Silsoe Rd Barton Home Nursing Taymer of rear to Area3 of portion Northern Road Park of south A6, and Beeches The between land and Silsoe, Close, Tree Yew of south A6, and Road Barton between Land Village Garden Gravenhurst and Extension Urban Barton Village Garden Gravenhurst A6 of west immediately land adjoining and Road, Park 1-6 houses of Site Silsoe Street, High the of East Land Street High the of east Land Barton Road of east the to Land

Site Name Silsoe Silsoe Silsoe Silsoe Silsoe Silsoe Silsoe Silsoe Silsoe lpEnd Slip Silsoe Silsoe

Parish lpEnd Slip End Slip Silsoe Silsoe Standalone Barton Silsoe Silsoe Silsoe Silsoe Silsoe Silsoe Silsoe

Nearest Settlement re Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not

Green Belt 4.59 5.92 0.99 12.14 2.32 5.92 6.29 0.44 1.62 2.50 6.45 N/A 266.58 145.48 Site Size (ha) ALP165 ALP235 ALP004, NLP113 ALP104, NLP490

Overlapping Submissions oa lnprocess Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site

Outcome lnigpriso o h rpsdueadteeoei o lgbefrallocation. has for already eligible site not the is because therefore available and be circumstances. use to exceptional proposed considered for Belt. the not considered Green for a is be wider permission as Site to the planning identified 1D. criteria to been Stage fulfil contribution not at not no has fails does or and Site it weak Belt this weak, Green to relatively the addition a in In only located making is settlement. is site the that The from parcel 1E. detached Stage and at Silsoe fails to Site related poorly is Site 1B. Stage at fails Site Garden or Park Registered a by covered more or 50% is Site 1A. Stage at fails Site not is ALP418 assessment a in as to assessment referred further assessment. portion for further the proceed of that not assessment worthy scale should this greater site both a this counting of that double accordance be development considered avoid in could is to Barton, site it order of the ALP418 In north of and ALP418. the portion under to small assessment extending A the the development standalone. from It with small to disconnected settlement. a scale be contained as a would self further of A6 a considered be the form not of to homes would west part, 1500 and the in of settlement to or excess development whole in that a development considered as a on is site of which the benefits assets developing the heritage through by designated either outweighed the Development be to balance. not further harm planning would of substantial using balance worthy cause consideration not would overall is site an site this on the within based that 2 considered Stage is settlement at It the Failed is standalone. from It to disconnected settlement. scale be contained a would self assessment. of A6 a be the form either not of to homes would west part, 1500 and the in of to or excess development whole in that a development balance considered as a on site of which the benefits assets developing the heritage through by designated within outweighed the Development be to not harm identified: following would substantial been The cause have balance. would issues planning site following using this The consideration Garden identified: overall or been an Park have on Registered issues based a 2 by Stage covered at more Failed or 50% is Site 1A. also Stage are at There fails Site Park. Wrest the of on setting impact site. the would the impact and for would Silsoe aspirations site with following GI and relationship The settlement poor balance. the a planning of has using settlement.character site consideration the identified: overall from been an detached have on and issues based at Silsoe 2 more to Stage or related at 50% poorly Failed is is Site Site 3. 1B. and Stage 2 at Zones fails Flood Site within more settlement. flooding. or the water 50% from surface is detached of Site and risk 1A. Silsoe Stage to at related fails poorly Site is also Site are 1B. There Stage at Park. fails Wrest Site the of on setting impact site. the would the impact and for would Silsoe aspirations site with following GI and relationship The settlement poor balance. the a planning Garden of has using or character site consideration Park identified: overall Registered been an a have on by issues based covered 2 more Stage or at 50% Failed is Site 1A. Stage at fails Site area. this in Silsoe of pattern settlement

Justification L51Ln /1-3Suhl d Southill Rd, Southill r/o17-33 Land NLP521 NLP520 NLP519 NLP518 NLP517 Southill NLP516 Rd Southill of south Land NLP359 Farm Broom at Land NLP358 Broom of south Land NLP357 NLP086 ALP422 ALP340 NLP386 NLP380 End Slip at Land NLP284 NLP240 NLP239 End Slip at Land NLP227 NLP167 ALP111

ID Broom Road, High of north Land Broom Rd, Southill Farm, Broom of west Land Broom Rd, Southill of south Land Broom Farm, Manor at Land Broom Avenue, Bancroft of north at Land Broom Rd, Southill of North the to Land Avenue Bancroft of north Land Road Southill of south Land Luton End, Slip Street, Front 90 to adjacent Land Lane Moon Half and Street Front off Land Allotments Woodside Former End Slip Road, Church at Land End Slip Road Markyate of south Land Road Woodside fronting Land

Site Name Southill Southill Southill Southill Southill End Slip End Slip End Slip End Slip End Slip End Slip End Slip End Slip Southill Southill Southill Southill Southill

Parish Broom Broom Broom Broom Broom Broom Broom Broom Broom Broom Broom Broom End Slip End Slip ck End/Peppersto Slip End Slip ck End/Peppersto Slip End Slip End Slip Park Caravan Woodside

Nearest Settlement o re 2.12 Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green

Green Belt 6.78 2.36 1.22 0.81 17.80 6.86 0.30 2.13 0.96 1.17 3.30 2.22 1.17 1.14 21.00 6.94 2.27 1.14 6.51 Site Size (ha) L57St ob considered be to Site NLP517 NLP357 NLP357 NLP521 ALP422 NLP357 NLP357 NLP358, NLP516 NLP357 ALP340, NLP380 NLP386 ALP110 NLP240

Overlapping Submissions oa lnprocess Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site

Outcome iefisa tg B iede o ersn oia xeso si ol xedthe extend would it as extension logical a way. represent settlement. unsustainable not from an does detached in Site and settlement 1B. Broom Stage to at related fails poorly Site is settlement. Site from 1B. detached Stage and at Broom fails to Site related poorly is settlement. Site from 1B. detached Stage and at Broom fails to Site related poorly is Site 1B. Stage at fails Site settlement. from detached and Broom scale. to and related size poorly its is to Site due 1B. Broom Stage with at relationship fails poor Site a has immediately site located The also 1B. is Stage site at The fails site. Site on east the impacting the of as to east well quarry south as Broom the village to to the adjacent Hall to have Broom gateway also of the would setting affecting proposal the landscape, The on development. parcels impact new developed adverse the under an and in envelope resulting settlement westwards the settlement following between the The extend balance. would planning site using The consideration identified: overall been an have on issues based 2 Stage at Failed settlement. from detached and Broom to related poorly is Site address 1B. would Stage site at the fails of Site and portion End a Slip only between forward Belt taking Green issue. that in this considered coalescence not cause address is would would it Site site , 1B. the Stage of and at portion End fails a Slip Site only between forward Belt taking Green issue. that in this considered coalescence is not cause area is would the it Site because Pepperstock, 1B. this Stage of at and potion End fails coalescence. a Slip Site cause only between still forward Belt would take Green and to in small appropriate coalescence not cause is would from It Site detached Pepperstock. 1B. and Stage End/Caddington at Slip circumstances. fails to exceptional Site related for Belt. poorly considered Green a is be wider as Site to the settlement. identified 1B. criteria to been Stage fulfil contribution not at not no has fails does or and Site it weak Belt this weak, Green to relatively the addition a in In only located making is address is site would that The site parcel 1E. the Stage of at and portion End fails a Slip Site only between forward Belt taking Green issue. that in this considered coalescence not cause is would it Site Pepperstock, 1B. Stage at fails Site more. or dwellings ten accommodate not would Site 1A. Stage at fails Site

Justification ALP270 ALP268 ALP267 ALP266 ALP229 NLP408 Farm Froghall at Land NLP402 NLP094 NLP085 Road Stanbridge NLP072 ALP278 ALP249 Road Stanbridge ALP067

ID Crescent Mayfield of south Land Stadium Greyhound Henlow Stondon Lower of Expansion Expansion Northern Stondon Lower Road Hillside of rear to Land Road Steppingley of south Land Flitwick of west north Land Steppingley Rd, Rectory of South Land Farm Deans Depot Midway Broom

Site Name Steppingley Steppingley Steppingley Steppingley Stanbridge Stanbridge Stanbridge Stanbridge Stondon Stondon Stondon Stondon Stondon

Parish oe Stondon Lower Stondon Lower Stondon Lower Stondon Lower Flitwick Flitwick Flitwick Steppingley Buzzard Leighton Stanbridge Stanbridge Buzzard Leighton

Nearest Settlement Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt

Green Belt 1.56 3.71 NLP072 27.48 2.24 2.94 47.71 11.66 0.27 25.44 NLP094 23.98 5.69 0.94 NLP067 15.37 Site Size (ha) NLP392 ALP469 ALP429, ALP267, NLP402 N/A N/A

Overlapping Submissions oa lnprocess Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered will be site the of portion A Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site N/A N/A process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further

Outcome aeavsa mato h ie adcp n h iewudetn development extend would site would the and and site landscape exposed following wider an The the on on is balance. impact site planning visual impacts using a landscape consideration have adverse overall identified: an been on have based issues 2 Stage at fails Site would scale, and size its to due site, full settlement. the the impact of the character to the due on progress have to only site of Portion more. or dwellings ten accommodate not would issue. Site this 1A. address Stage would considered at site not fails Site the is Site settlement. of It the portion Flitwick. from a and detached only Ampthill and forward between Flitwick taking Belt to that Green related this in poorly address coalescence is would cause Site site would 1B. the Stage of at portion and fails a Ampthill Site only between forward Belt taking Green that in issue. considered coalescence this not cause address is would would It Site site Flitwick. 1B. the Stage of at portion fails and a Ampthill Site only between forward Belt taking Green circumstances. that in exceptional issue. considered coalescence for Belt. not cause considered Green is a would be wider It as Site to the Flitwick. identified 1B. criteria to been Stage fulfil contribution not at not no has fails does or and Site it weak Belt this weak, Green to relatively the addition a in In only located making is is site that The parcel 1E. of Stage require worthy at will not fails boundaries is Site demonstrated. greenbelt site be the the to to that circumstances alteration considered substantial exceptional Any is this development. it outweigh for above, would consideration outlined development further reasons of countryside. the benefits the For the of identified. that beauty harm considered and wider not character the is intrinsic upon soft it the development that the Whereby to the considered and harm of is site substantial impact it the causing visual site between landscape the the views landscape; mitigate of ranging the not topography long on would the are impact landscaping to there site’s Due that the such with following landscape. is concern The surrounding site key balance. the a planning of is using topography There consideration the overall identified: an been on have based issues 2, Stage at fails Site uses. employment proposes Site assessed. not Site uses. employment proposes demonstrated. Site be alteration assessed. to Any not circumstances development. Site exceptional for require consideration will further is boundaries of it greenbelt worthy above, the not outlined development to is reasons of site the benefits the For the existing that identified. that the considered harm considered with substantial not relationship this is visual the outweigh it poor on would Whereby a development Linslade. feature that Leighton would considered of spur is intrinsic settlement the it the of addition, to visual slope In harm the facing countryside. substantial mitigate south the causing not of landscape would beauty wider landscaping and the soft to the character upon that Due and development considered spur. site the is the the of it of between impact site slopes views the southern ranging landscape; of and long the topography northern are on the the there impact on that site’s particularly such the following landscape, is with The surrounding site concern balance. the key planning of a using topography is consideration the There overall identified: an been on have based issues 2, Stage at fails Site

Justification L11Ln eto A1 of west Land ALP171 Field Gunabe ALP049 NLP448 NLP429 NLP428 NLP392 Farm Stondon Bury Holwell NLP295 Rd Bedford of west Land NLP291 NLP281 Road Station off Land NLP279 NLP179 NLP162 ALP469 Farm College Trinity ALP378 ALP304 ALP298 ALP272 ALP271

ID tto Rd Station 85 to adjacent Land Stadium Greyhound Henlow at Land Stadium Greyhound Henlow of south the to Land Crescent Mayfield off Land Stondon Lower Pastures the off Land Road Bedford and Road Station between Land Farm College Trinity at Land Stadium Greyhound Henlow Road Bedford of west Land School Lower Stondon to adjacent Land Track Greyhound of south Land Surgery Doctor's of rear to Land

Site Name Stondon Stondon Stondon Stondon Stondon Stondon Stondon Stondon Stondon Stondon Stondon Stondon Stotfold Stotfold Stondon Stondon Stondon

Parish Stotfold Stotfold Stondon Lower Stondon Lower Stondon Lower Stondon Lower Stondon Lower Stondon Lower Stondon Lower Stondon Lower Stondon Lower Stondon Lower Stondon Lower Stondon Lower Stondon Lower Stondon Lower Stondon Lower Stondon Lower

Nearest Settlement Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not

Green Belt 2.94 5.45 3.50 1.36 0.89 3.01 33.36 1.48 0.37 2.91 0.83 2.24 5.97 5.47 1.37 2.50 NLP295 36.75 2.84 Site Size (ha) NLP100 ALP266 ALP469 ALP268, ALP267, ALP272 ALP270 NLP179 ALP298 ALP378 ALP268 ALP429, ALP267, NLP162 NLP281 NLP428

Overlapping Submissions oa lnprocess Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered will be site the of portion A Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered will be site the of portion A Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site

Outcome alda tg B iehsapo eainhpwt ttoddet t ieadsprto by separation and size its to due Stotfold the with of relationship part poor of Brook. a loss Pix has the the Site . in this 1B. of result Stage of hamlet would character at historic and rural Failed the land the of agricultural on setting 2 impact following countryside Grade adverse The important of an balance. loss have planning the would using and site consideration area overall identified: an been on have based issues 2 Stage at fails Site setting rural the development into extend sprawl would in site would resulting the and envelope and site settlement landscape exposed following the wider an The beyond the on southwards, on is balance. impact site planning visual impacts using a landscape consideration have adverse overall allocation. has identified: an for already been on eligible site have based not the issues 2 is because Stage therefore available at and be fails use to Site separation. proposed considered its the not to for is due permission Site Stondon planning 1D. Lower Stage to at related fails well Site not is Site 1B. Stage at Failed allocation. has for already eligible site not the is because therefore available and be use to proposed considered the not for is Stondon. permission ground Site planning rising 1D. with over Stage related views at poorly with fails following is landscape Site The also rural balance. site of planning and part using south forms consideration to land overall identified: an been on have of based issues the character 2 beyond the Stage extending on at development have fails with would Site landscape site the full on the impact impact ridge. of the terms to in due settlement, progress the to only site of Portion and scale size, its of terms settlement. in the site, of full character the the impact on the have to would due topography, progress local to only site of Portion setting rural the into sprawl in resulting envelope settlement the beyond southwards,

Justification L31Ln f se adn,Stotfold Gardens, Aspen off Land NLP391 NLP329 End Fen NLP163 NLP160 NLP154 Stotfold NLP125 Lane Malthouse at Land NLP122 NLP119 NLP115 NLP106 Stotfold Rd Astwick of west Land NLP100 NLP078 NLP068 Road Taylors at Land NLP063 Road Taylors at Land ALP413 ALP395 Road Hitchin at Land ALP282 ALP208

ID Nursery Time Spring at Land Stotfold Road, Arlesey at Land Stotfold Rd Arlesey of South the to Land Lane Tree Rook of east Land Stotfold Road, Arlesey at Land Stotfold Road Taylor's off Land Stotfold Rd Hitchin of west Land Road Taylor's and Road Astwick between Land Nursery) Taylors (formally Nursery Ivel River Road Taylor's of west Land Road Taylor's & Astwick to adjacent Land

Site Name Stotfold Stotfold Stotfold Stotfold Stotfold Stotfold Stotfold Stotfold Stotfold Stotfold Stotfold Stotfold Stotfold Stotfold Stotfold

Parish Stotfold Stotfold Stotfold Stotfold Stotfold Stotfold Stotfold Stotfold Stotfold Stotfold Stotfold Stotfold Stotfold Stotfold Stotfold Stotfold Stotfold Stotfold

Nearest Settlement o re 4.38 Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not

Green Belt 3.23 0.97 4.47 7.90 4.61 NLP106 21.87 0.86 22.21 0.20 5.16 4.22 0.57 5.25 18.77 0.89 ALP282 36.88 5.34 Site Size (ha) NLP468 ALP395 NLP329 NLP078 ALP395

Overlapping Submissions iet econsidered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site

Outcome iefisa tg B h iehsapo eainhpwt ttodadi eaae ythe by separated is and Stotfold with relationship poor a or has 50% site is Ivel. The Site River 1B. more. Stage or at flooding. dwellings fails water ten Site surface accommodate of not risk would at Site more 1A. Stage at fails Site the from issues flooding hold may but zone flood a within not is site importance the sites brook. Also the adjacent corridors consultees buffer. green from rural existing Comments a on way. of as impacts illogical line negative an residential surrounding in existing following issues settlement the The highlight the follow balance. extend not planning would does using and site consideration development The overall allocation. has identified: an for already been on eligible site have based not the issues 2 is because Stage therefore available at and be fails use to Site proposed considered the not for is permission Site planning 1D. Stage site. needs at the wildlife fails for for strongSite aspirations important with GI corridor village, and Ivel of buffer River core following significant landscape; historic The valley within balance. Ivel land planning of open using characteristic valuable consideration identified: overall ridge been an clay have on to characterissues based foreground settlement 2 forming the Stage vale on at open impact followingFailed into adverse The extends an balance. land have planning the would using and site consideration identified: overall been an have on issues based 2 Stage at Failed suitable. over considered concerns not and is reasons following site landscape The the and balance. Arlesey, ecological planning with the to using coalescence of Due consideration part identified: overall of been an loss have on the issues based Astwick. in this 2 of result of Stage hamlet would character at historic and rural Fail the land the of agricultural on setting 2 impact following countryside Grade adverse The important of an balance. loss have planning the would using and site consideration area overall identified: an been on have forming based setting issues 2 farmland Stage attractive at the fails Stotfold. maintain Site and to the Astwick need on between the impact space its following the and Astwick, The here, with balance. Stotfold coalescence planning of over using 3. character concerns consideration and identified: overall 2 been an Zones have on Flood issues based within 2 more Stage or at 50% Failed 3. is and Site 2 1A. Zones Stage Flood at within fails more Site or 50% 3. is and Site 2 1A. Zones Stage Flood at within fails more Site or 50% is Site 1A. forming Stage setting at farmland fails attractive Site the Stotfold. maintain and to the Astwick need on between the impact space its following the and Astwick, The here, with balance. Stotfold coalescence planning of over using character concerns consideration identified: overall been an protected have on are issues based safeguarded. there 2 be ecologically Stage to buffer. at need this Failed Stotfold that maintain and Woods to Arlesey Etonbury terms between following within landscape coalescence The species in to balance. important lead planning is could using it site consideration and the overall allocation. has identified: an for already been on eligible site have based not the issues 2 is because Stage therefore available at and be fails use to Site proposed considered the not for is permission Site planning 1D. Stage at fails Site

Justification L18TeWillows The ALP168 ALP142 NLP393 Yard Long NLP354 NLP277 Farm Westhill NLP254 NLP238 NLP225 Hedgeside ALP137 Rd Harlington off Land NLP352 Farm Whitehill at Land NLP247 NLP246 NLP224 Farm Brookmead ALP310 Farm Fruit Littlebury NLP481 Road Arlesey off Land NLP468 Stotfold of south Land NLP434 NLP427 NLP425

ID Quarry Sundon to adjacent Land Cottages Bells The adjacent Land Holywell Rd Dunstable to adj Rd Holywell of south Land Rd Common 55 & 41 Between Farm View Valley ) Rd A6 (Barton the of east at Land Streatley Road Sharpenhoe at Land Stotfold A1, the of west Land Stotfold Farm, Boundary at Land Stotfold

Site Name Studham Studham Streatley Streatley Streatley Streatley Streatley Stotfold Stotfold Stotfold Stotfold Stotfold Sundon Sundon Studham Studham Studham Studham Studham

Parish pe udnGenBelt Green Sundon Upper Luton Studham Studham Holywell Holywell Studham Gaddesden Little Holywell Sharpenhoe Streatley Luton Streatley Sharpenhoe Stotfold Stotfold Stotfold Stotfold Radwell

Nearest Settlement re Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt

Green Belt 6.04 1.96 4.21 2.24 43.93 12.23 0.52 N/A 49.97 0.52 7.27 9.22 0.76 0.57 0.17 1.24 6.04 37.65 20.00 0.26 Site Size (ha) NLP277 N/A ALP310 NLP352 NLP154 N/A N/A

Overlapping Submissions oa lnprocess Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site N/A process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site N/A N/A Plan. Local the of part as further

Outcome aclta smkn nyarltvl ek eko ocnrbto otewdrGenBelt. Green a wider as the identified to been contribution not no has or and weak Belt weak, Green settlement. relatively the the a in from only located detached making is is is site and that The Luton parcel 1E. to Stage related at well fails not Site is AONB. Site Chilterns 1B. the Stage by at covered fails more Site or 50% is AONB. Site Chilterns 1A. the Stage by at covered fails more Site or 50% is Site 1A. AONB. Stage Chilterns at the fails by Site covered more or 50% is Site 1A. AONB. Stage Chilterns at the fails by Site covered more or 50% is AONB. Site Chilterns 1A. the Stage by at covered fails more Site or 50% is Site 1A. Stage at fails Site accommodation. AONB. G&T Chilterns proposes the Site by assessed. covered not more Site or 50% is AONB. Site Chilterns 1A. the Stage by at covered fails more Site or 50% settlement. is the Site from 1A. detached Stage and at Luton fails to Site related poorly is Site 1B. Stage consideration. at further that fails of considered Site worthy is not not it would is above development site outlined the this reasons of within the benefits setting development For the the harm. that including identified considered countryside, the is the outweigh It of AONB. beauty cause Chiltern’s and would the character and of intrinsic Ditches the the Dray’s to to as harm harm known substantial issues significant monument cause following scheduled would The the site balance. of this planning significance of using or Development consideration 50% identified: overall is been an Site have on more. based or 2, dwellings Stage AONB ten Fails Chilterns accommodate AONB. the not Chilterns by would the covered Site by more 1A. covered Stage more at or fails 50% Site is from Site detached 1A. and Stage Stotfold at of fails the settlement Site from the issues to flooding related hold poorly may is but settlement. Site zone the 1B. flood Stage a at within fails not Site is site importance the sites brook. Also the adjacent corridors consultees buffer. green from rural existing Comments of a on way. line as impacts illogical residential negative an existing surrounding in the issues settlement follow following highlight the not The extend does balance. would site planning and The using development consideration identified: overall as been an acts have on also issues based site 2 the Stage and a at dwellings. road provides Fails existing the area that for from The land space impacts A507. on recreational noise the is informal reduce and site to development the helping residential development; following buffer existing for The woodland between suitable balance. buffer not planning a is using as site consideration acts The overall identified: an been on have based issues 2 Stage at fails Site uses. employment proposes Site assessed. not Site uses. employment proposes Site assessed. not Site

Justification NLP409 NLP360 NLP314 NLP134 ALP309 ALP308 Airfield Tempsford NLP450 Villas Rose at Land Sutton NLP340 Street High of South Land NLP325 ALP444 SUE Luton North NLP426 Farm Manor NLP368 NLP322 Sundon NLP267 Road Streatley at Land NLP056 Lane Common at Land ALP393 Depot Coach Former ALP359

ID Road, Dunstable A505 of North and A5 of West Land Rd Stanbridge 44 adjoining Land Tilsworth Rd Dunstable of west and Rd Stanbridge of south Land Manor Tilsworth around Land Farm Stud Tilsworth at Land Road Potton Oak, Simply Formerly Plant Vauxhall of north and 11A Junction of east Land Sundon Upper Lane, Common at Land

Site Name Tilsworth Tempsford Sutton Sutton Sundon Sundon Sundon Sundon Sundon Sundon Tilsworth Tilsworth Tilsworth Tilsworth Tilsworth

Parish Tilsworth Tilsworth Tilsworth Tilsworth Tilsworth Tilsworth HMA) (Bedford Tempsford Sutton Sutton Biggleswade MMA) (Luton Sundon Lower and Belt Luton Green Sundon Lower Luton Belt Green Sundon Upper Belt Green Sundon Upper Sundon

Nearest Settlement re Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green

Green Belt 42 NLP426 74.29 ALP393 11.00 3.49 11.13 0.06 0.44 9.27 1.88 3.54 0.56 5.82 205.58 5.13 2.04 1.00 283.00 17.75 Site Size (ha) N/A NLP267

Overlapping Submissions oa lnprocess Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site N/A Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site

Outcome iehsbe ihrw rmtest sesetpoesa h adi olne available longer no is land the settlement. as the process from assessment detached site is development. the and for from Tilsworth withdrawn to been related has circumstances. poorly exceptional Site is for Belt. Site considered Green 1B. a be wider Stage as to the identified at criteria to been fails fulfil contribution not Site not no has does or and it weak Belt this weak, Green to relatively the circumstances. addition a in exceptional In only located for Belt. making is considered Green is a site be wider that as The to the parcel identified 1E. criteria to been Stage fulfil contribution not at not no has fails does or and Site it weak Belt this weak, Green to relatively the circumstances. addition a in exceptional In only located for Belt. making is considered Green is a site be wider that as The to the parcel identified 1E. criteria to been Stage fulfil contribution not at not no has fails does or and Site it weak Belt this weak, Green to relatively the circumstances. addition a in exceptional In only located for Belt. making is considered Green is a site be wider that as The to the parcel identified 1E. criteria to been Stage fulfil contribution not at not no has fails does or and Site it weak Belt this weak, Green to relatively the addition a in In only located making is is site that The parcel 1E. Stage at fails Site at more or 50% is Site 3. and 2 Zones Flood within more flooding. or water 50% surface is of Site risk 1A. Stage at fails Site uses. educational proposes Site assessed. not Site the from detached and Sundon Lower to related poorly is not Site is settlement. 1B. isolation Stage in at site the fails this For Site within mitigation. consideration. development require number further that would a of considered which are worthy is site there it the above, above to the outlined adjacent to is reasons pollution addition that noise In infrastructure of location. local the sources this the outweigh of in provide would is development not isolation It support would in building. to scale site listed required this this 1 of of Grade development development a the Furthermore, of Mary, of harm. benefits St. significance the of the that Church to considered the harm issues not being cause following this will The asset, site balance. circumstances. heritage the planning exceptional designated of using for Belt. Development consideration considered Green identified: a overall be wider been as an to the have identified on criteria to been based fulfil contribution not 2, not no has Stage does or and Fails it weak Belt this weak, Green to relatively the circumstances. addition a in exceptional In only located for Belt. making is considered Green is a site be wider that as The to the parcel identified 1E. criteria to been Stage fulfil contribution not at not no has fails does or and Site it weak Belt this weak, Green to relatively the circumstances. addition a in exceptional In only located for Belt. making is considered Green is a site be wider that as The to the parcel identified 1E. criteria to been Stage fulfil contribution not at not no has fails does or and Site it weak Belt this weak, Green to relatively the addition a in In only located making is is site more. that The or parcel 1E. dwellings Stage ten at accommodate fails not Site would Site circumstances. 1A. exceptional Stage for at considered fails be Site to criteria fulfil not does it this to addition In

Justification L14Mdl Lakes Middle NLP184 NLP153 NLP152 NLP138 NLP069 Lane Long Longview NLP041 NLP032 Farm Griffin near Land NLP002 Farm Crowbush ALP227 Farm Briarmead ALP193 Toddington Road Dunstable off Land ALP189 Toddington Farm Short Drop at Land ALP160 ALP146 ALP118 ALP091 Lakes Middle ALP086 ALP078 Field Tony's NLP001 NLP500 NLP499

ID egtnR Toddington Rd of Leighton east south the to Land Toddington Rd of Leighton east south the to Land Toddington Rd Luton at Land End) Tanners to (Adj Road Station of north Land Toddington Road, Leighton at Land Farm Park Old A5120 of south the to Land Road Leighton 117 at Land Road Luton 55-56 of rear to Land Evergreens Farm Home

Site Name Toddington Toddington Toddington Toddington Toddington Toddington Toddington Toddington Toddington Toddington Tilsworth Tilsworth Toddington Toddington Toddington Toddington Toddington

Parish Toddington Toddington Toddington Toddington Toddington Toddington Toddington Toddington Toddington Toddington Toddington Toddington Standalone Toddington Toddington Toddington Toddington Tingrith Tilsworth Tilsworth

Nearest Settlement re Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green

Green Belt 5.60 135.25 3.20 1.45 2.83 0.07 0.99 0.18 0.08 2.83 2.12 0.71 1.46 0.90 1.88 3.13 51.24 NLP453 32.90 2.03 NLP348 14.50 Site Size (ha) ALP086 NLP294 N/A N/A NLP184 N/A N/A

Overlapping Submissions oa Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered will be site the of portion A Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further be considered will site the of portion processA Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further be considered will site the of portion processA Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site N/A N/A process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site N/A N/A

Outcome oto fst nyt rgesbcueo h mattefl ie u oissz,saeand scale size, its to settlement. due the site, of full character the the impact on the have of would because topography, progress local to only site of Portion circumstances. exceptional for Belt. considered Green a be wider as to the identified criteria to been fulfil contribution not not no has does or and it weak Belt this weak, Green to relatively the circumstances. addition a in exceptional In only located for Belt. making is considered Green is a site be wider that as The to the parcel identified 1E. criteria to been Stage fulfil contribution not at not no has fails does or and Site it weak Belt this weak, Green to relatively the circumstances. addition a in exceptional In only located for Belt. making is considered Green is a site be wider that as The to the parcel identified 1E. criteria to been Stage fulfil contribution not at not no has fails does or and Site it weak Belt this weak, Green to relatively the addition a in settlement.In only located the making is from is site detached that The and parcel 1E. Toddington Stage to at related fails poorly Site is Site 1B. Toddington. Stage with at relationship fails poor Site a has site The 1B. the Stage of at character fails full the Site the on impact have the would of topography, because they local progress that and to stated scale only and size, site Council settlement. of the its site.Portion contacted to the has due site site, develop the to of wish landowner not A do 1D. Toddington. Stage to at related fails well Site not is and Site scale . size, 1B Stage its at to fails settlement. due Site the site, of full character the the impact they on the that have of stated would because and topography, progress Council local to the only site. contacted site the has of site Portion develop the to of wish landowner not from A separated do 1D. is Stage and at Toddington fails with Site relationship poor a has site village. The the 1B. Stage at fails Site uses. employment proposes Site assessed. not Site uses. employment proposes Toddington. Site to assessed. related not well Site not is Site . 1B Stage at fails Site more. or dwellings ten accommodate circumstances. not exceptional would for Belt. Site considered Green 1A. a be wider Stage as to the identified at criteria to been fails fulfil contribution not Site not no has does or and it weak Belt this weak, Green to relatively the addition a in In only located making is is site that The parcel 1E. Stage at fails Site accommodation. G&T proposes Site assessed. not Site accommodation. G&T proposes Site assessed. not Site

Justification L37Ws iwFarm View West NLP317 Westoning NLP136 Westoning of south Land ALP316 Site Bunyan ALP175 NLP432 NLP120 Farm Fossey's NLP117 Farm Lea Farm/ Leys ALP128 NLP454 NLP453 NLP443 Farm Alma NLP411 NLP410 NLP405 NLP378 NLP376 NLP374 Farm Fairview NLP348 NLP294

ID Westoning Rd Flitwick off Land Dunstable Road, Tring at Land Road Hill Castle 165a Lane Long to adjacent Rd and Station of rear to Land Farm Crowbush including Rd Dunstable - Rd Luton between Land Farm Park Old at Land village Toddington of east Road, Harlington of south Land Toddington Rd Leighton of east the to Land Toddington Rd Leighton at Land Rd Harlington of south and M1 of west Land J12 M1 of east Land Road of Luton east the to lying Land

Site Name Totternhoe Totternhoe Toddington Toddington Toddington Toddington Toddington Toddington Toddington Toddington Toddington Toddington Toddington Westoning Westoning Westoning Totternhoe Totternhoe

Parish Westoning Westoning Westoning Westoning Totternhoe Totternhoe Totternhoe Totternhoe Toddington Toddington Standalone Toddington Toddington Toddington Toddington Toddington Toddington Toddington Toddington

Nearest Settlement re Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green

Green Belt 14.07 6.53 9.30 6.23 4.89 ALP189 14.57 0.44 4.74 7.51 27.62 0.67 81.96 1.10 0.26 1.54 4.58 ALP227 34.51 111.35 6.61 Site Size (ha) NLP038 N/A N/A N/A NLP138

Overlapping Submissions ute spr fthe of part as further considered be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further be considered will site the of portion A process. Plan Local from excluded be to Site N/A Plan. Local the of part as further considered be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local the of part as further considered will be site the of portion A Plan. Local the of part as further considered will be site the of portion A N/A N/A Plan. Local the of part as further be considered will site the of portion processA Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site

Outcome iefisa tg B iei oryrltdt etnn n eahdfo h settlement. the from detached and Westoning to related circumstances. poorly exceptional is for Belt. Site considered Green 1B. a be wider Stage as to the identified at criteria to been fails fulfil contribution not Site not no has does or and it weak Belt this weak, Green to relatively the addition a in In only located address making is would is site site that The the parcel 1E. of Stage portion at a Totternhoe fails only between Site forward Belt taking Green that the circumstances. issue. considered in exceptional this not coalescence for Belt. is cause considered Green it a would be wider Dunstable, as Site to the and identified 1B. criteria to been Stage fulfil contribution not at not no has fails does or and Site it weak Belt this weak, Green to relatively the addition a in In only located making is is site more. that The or parcel 1E. dwellings Stage ten at accommodate fails not Site would would Site it 1A. as Stage Totternhoe at to fails extension Site way. logical circumstances. unsustainable a exceptional an represent for Belt. in not considered Green settlement a does be wider the as Site to the extend identified 1B. criteria to been Stage fulfil contribution not at not no has fails does or and Site it weak Belt this weak, Green to relatively the addition a in In only located making and is is site site that the The parcel of 1E. scale Stage the at to fails due Site they progress that to stated only and site Council of the site.Portion contacted the has site topography. develop the to of wish landowner not A do 1D. Stage at fails Site uses. employment proposes Site assessed. not Site circumstances. exceptional for Belt. considered Green a be wider as to the identified criteria to been fulfil contribution not not no has does or and it weak Belt this weak, Green to relatively the addition a in In and only located scale making is size, is site that The its parcel 1E. to Stage settlement. due at the site, fails of full Site character the the impact on the have of would and because topography, scale progress local size, to only its site to of settlement. due Portion the site, of full character the the impact on the have of would because topography, progress local to only site of Portion uses. employment proposes Site assessed. not Site uses. on employment have proposes would Site topography, assessed. local not and Site scale size, consideration further its warrants they settlement. to site that the due this stated of site, of and character full portion Council the the a the impact site.Only contacted the the has of site because develop the circumstances. to of exceptional wish landowner for not Belt. A considered do Green 1D. a be wider Stage as to the identified at criteria to been fails fulfil contribution not Site not no has does or and it weak Belt this weak, Green to relatively the addition a in In only located making is is site that The parcel 1E. Stage at fails Site

Justification NLP333 Street High of east Land NLP092 Farm Speedwell NLP180 Road Newport off Land ALP334 ALP333 ALP332 End London at Land ALP330

ID Rd Potton at Land (2) Street Leighton off Land (1) Street Leighton off Land

Site Name Hatley Cockayne and Wrestlingworth Hatley Cockayne and Wrestlingworth Woburn Woburn Woburn Woburn Woburn

Parish Wrestlingworth Wrestlingworth Woburn Woburn Woburn Woburn Woburn

Nearest Settlement Belt Green Not Belt Green Not Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green Belt Green

Green Belt 2.30 0.55 1.17 0.94 1.86 1.24 1.01 Site Size (ha)

Overlapping Submissions oa lnprocess Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site process Plan Local from excluded be to Site Plan. Local

Outcome iefisa tg A iei 0 rmr trs fsraewtrflooding. water surface of risk at more or 50% is GI Site the 1A. in Stage GI at for fails aspirations Site are there and village the to as edge implications rural landscape and Plan. attractive adverse pattern an be settlement forms would on following site there impact The the development; adverse balance. back-land an planning settlement to have using the due would consideration from character site overall detached identified: an is been on and have based Woburn issues 2 to Stage related at settlement well fails the not Site from is detached Site is 1B. and Stage Woburn at to fails related Site poorly circumstances. is exceptional Site for Belt. . considered Green 1B a be wider Stage as to the identified at criteria to been fails fulfil contribution not Site not no has does or and it weak Belt this weak, Green to relatively the circumstances. addition a in exceptional In only located for Belt. making is considered Green is a site be wider that as The to the parcel identified 1E. criteria to been Stage fulfil contribution not at not no has fails does or and Site it weak Belt this weak, Green to relatively the circumstances. addition a in exceptional In only located for Belt. making is considered Green is a site be wider that as The to the parcel identified 1E. criteria to been Stage fulfil contribution not at not no has fails does or and Site it weak Belt this weak, Green to relatively the addition a in In only located making is is site that The parcel 1E. Stage at fails Site

Justification