DOCSLIB.ORG

Energy of Surroundings

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Energy of Surroundings Chapter 6: Solution Thermodynamics and Principles of Phase Equilibria In all the preceding chapters we have focused primarily on thermodynamic systems comprising pure substances. However, in all of nature, mixtures are ubiquitous. In chemical process plants – the ultimate domain of application of the principles of chemical engineering thermodynamics – matter is dominantly processed in the form of mixtures. Process streams are typically comprised of multiple components, very often distributed over multiple phases. Separation or mixing processes necessitate the use of multiple phases in order to preferentially concentrate the desired materials in one of the phases. Reactors very often bring together various reactants that exist in different phases. It follows that during mixing, separation, inter-phase transfer, and reaction processes occurring in chemical plants multi-component gases or liquids undergo composition changes. Thus, in the thermodynamic description of such systems, in addition to pressure and temperature, composition plays a key role. Further, whenever multiple phases are present in a system, material and energy transfer occurs between till the phases are in equilibrium with each other, i.e., the system tends to a state wherein the all thermal, mechanical and chemical potential (introduced earlier in section 1.4) gradients within and across all phases cease to exist. The present chapter constitutes a systematic development of the concept of a new class of properties essential to description of real mixtures, as well of the idea of the chemical potential necessary for deriving the criterion of phase and chemical reaction equilibrium. Such properties facilitate the application of the first and second law principles to quantitatively describe changes of internal, energy, enthalpy and entropy of multi-component and multiphase systems. Of the separate class of properties relevant to multi-component and multi-phase systems, the partial molar property and the chemical potential are particularly important. The former is used for describing behaviour of homogeneous multi-component systems, while the latter forms the fundament to description equilibrium in multi-phase, as well as reactive systems. As in the case of pure gases, the ideal gas mixture acts as a datum for estimating the properties of real gas mixtures. The comparison of the properties of the real and ideal gas mixtures leads to the introduction of the concept of fugacity, a property that is further related to the chemical potential. Fugacity may also be expressed as a function of volumetric properties of fluids. As we will see, the functional equivalence of fugacity and the chemical potential provides a convenient pathway for relating the temperature, pressure and phase composition of a system under equilibrium. In the last chapter it was demonstrated that residual properties provide very suitable means of estimating real gas properties. But as pointed out its usage for description of liquid states is not convenient. This difficulty is overcome by the formulation of a concept of ideal solution behaviour, which serves as a datum for estimating properties of real liquid solutions. The departure of the property of a real solution from that of an ideal one is termed as excess property. In other words, the excess property plays a role similar to that of residual property. In the description of solution behaviour at low to moderate pressures, we employ yet another property, the activity coefficient; which originates from the concept of fugacity. The activity coefficient may also be related to the excess Gibbs energy. It is useful not only as a measure of the extent of non-ideality of a real solution but also, more significantly in describing phase equilibria at low to moderate pressures. 6.1 Partial Molar Property We consider first the case of a homogenous (single-phase), open system that can interchange matter with its surroundings and hence undergo a change of composition. Therefore, the total value of any extensive property M t (M≡ VU , , H ,,, S AG ) is not only a function of T and P, but also of the actual number of moles of each species present in the system. Thus, we may write the following general property relation: t M= nM = M( T, P , n12 , n …… .. niN . n ) ..(6.1) Where N ≡ total number of chemical species in the system N nn= total number of moles in the system = ∑ i ..(6.2) i Taking the total derivative for both sides of eqn. 6.1: ∂∂∂()nM ()nM ()nM =++ d() nM dP dT dni ..(6.2) ∂∂∂PTnTn,, Pn i T,, Pnji≠ Where, subscript n indicates that all mole numbers are held constant and subscript n ji≠ that all mole numbers except ni are held constant. This equation has the simpler form: ∂∂MM d() nM=++ n dP n dT∑ Mii dn ..(6.3) ∂∂PTTx,, Tx i (the subscript x denotes differential at constant composition) ∂()nM Where: M i = ..(6.4) ∂ni PT,, nji≠ Eqn. 6.4 defines the partial molar property M i of species i in solution. It represents the change of total property ‘nM’ of a mixture resulting from addition at constant T and P of a differential amount of species ‘i’ to a finite amount of solution. In other words it also signifies the value of the property per mole of the specific species when it exists in solution. In general, the partial molar property of a substance differs from the molar property of the same substance in a pure state at the same temperature and pressure as the mixture or solution. This owing to the fact that while in a pure state the molecules interact with its own species, in a solution it may be subjected to different interaction potential with dissimilar molecules. This may render the value of a molar property different in mixed and pure states. Now, nii= x n; dn ii = x dn + n dx i Or : dnii= x dn + n dx i ..(6.5) Also: d() nM= ndM + Mdn ..(6.6) Substituting eqns. 6.5 and 6.6 in eqn. 6.3 leads to: ∂∂MM ndM+= Mdn n dP + n dT +∑ Mii() x dn + n dxi ..(6.7) ∂∂PTTx,, Tx i On re-arranging: ∂∂MM dM− dP − dT +∑∑ Mi dx i n +− M Mii x dn =0 ..(6.8) ∂∂PTTx,, Tx ii While deriving eqn. 6.8 no specific constraints on the values of either nor dn have been applied. This suggests that the equation is valid for any arbitrary values of these two variables. Thus n and dn are independent of each other. Therefore, eqn. 6.8 can only be valid if the coefficients of these two variables are identically zero. On putting the coefficients to zero the following equations obtain: ∂∂MM dM=−+ dP dT∑ Mii dx ∂∂PT Tx,,Tx i ..(6.9) MM= ∑ iix (at constant T & P) i ..(6.10) From eqn. 6.10, it follows, that nnM = ∑ xiiM …(6.11) i And also: dM = ∑∑xi dM i+ M iid x …(6.12) ii Equating (6.19) and (6.21) yields the well-known Gibbs-Duhem equation (GDE): ∂∂MM dP− dT −=∑ xii dM 0 ∂∂PT Tx,,Tx i ..(6.13) The GDE must be satisfied for all changes in P, T, and in M i caused by changes of state in a homogeneous phase. For the important special case of changes at constant T and P, it simplifies to: ∑ xii dM = 0 ..(6.14) i dM i Or, taking any arbitrary species ‘j’: ∑ xi = 0 (at const T, P) ..(6.15) i dx j Equations (6.14 and 6.15) implies that the partial molar properties of the various species ( Msi ' are not independent. Some key properties of partial molar properties are defined as follows: ∞ lim MMii= xoi → lim MMii= xi →1 lim MM= → i xi 1 Select additional relations among partial properties are demonstrated in the Appendix 6.1. Based on the foregoing considerations one may define an isothermal molar property change of mixing ∆M mix as follows: ∆Mmix (, TP ) = MTP (, ) −Σ xMTPi i (, ) ..(6.16) Or: ∆Mmix = M −Σ xMii =Σ xM ii −Σ xM ii =Σ x i() M i − M i ..(6.17) (M can be = V, U, H, S, A, G) Typical examples of molar volume change of mixing for a number of binary solutions are shown in figs. 6.1 and 6.2. Clearly then there can be substantial variation of this property depending upon the nature of the constituent molecules. Fig. 6.1 Molar volume change of mixing for solutions of cyclohexane (1) with some other C6 hydrocarbons (Source: H.C Van Ness and M. M. Abbott, Perry’s Chemical Engineer’s Handbook (7th ed.), McGraw Hill, 1997. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Example 6.1 o -6 3 Consider a solution of two species S1/S2 at 25 C such that x1 = 0.4. If V1 = 40 x 10 m /mol, find V2 . The solution specific gravity is = 0.90, and the molecular weights of the species are 32 and 18 respectively. (Click for solution) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fig. 6.2 Property changes of mixing at 50°C for 6 binary liquid systems: (a) chloroform(1)/n- heptane(2); (b) acetone(1)/methanol(2); (c) acetone(1)/chloroform(2); (d) ethanol(1)/n-heptane(2); (e) ethanol(1)/chloroform(2); ( f) ethanol(1)/water(2). (Source: H.C Van Ness and M. M. Abbott, Perry’s Chemical Engineer’s Handbook (7th ed.), McGraw Hill, 1997. 6.2 Partial Properties for Binary Solutions The partial property is generally not amenable to ab initio computation from theory, but may be conveniently determined by suitably designed experiments that help obtain isothermal molar property of mixing (eqn. 6.17). Here we illustrate a set of results that derive for a binary mixture, and which may be applied to compute the relevant partial molar properties at any composition.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter 4 Calculation of Standard Thermodynamic Properties of Aqueous Electrolytes and Non-Electrolytes
    Chapter 4 Calculation of Standard Thermodynamic Properties of Aqueous Electrolytes and Non-Electrolytes Vladimir Majer Laboratoire de Thermodynamique des Solutions et des Polymères Université Blaise Pascal Clermont II / CNRS 63177 Aubière, France Josef Sedlbauer Department of Chemistry Technical University Liberec 46117 Liberec, Czech Republic Robert H. Wood Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry University of Delaware Newark, DE 19716, USA 4.1 Introduction Thermodynamic modeling is important for understanding and predicting phase and chemical equilibria in industrial and natural aqueous systems at elevated temperatures and pressures. Such systems contain a variety of organic and inorganic solutes ranging from apolar nonelectrolytes to strong electrolytes; temperature and pressure strongly affect speciation of solutes that are encountered in molecular or ionic forms, or as ion pairs or complexes. Properties related to the Gibbs energy, such as thermodynamic equilibrium constants of hydrothermal reactions and activity coefficients of aqueous species, are required for practical use by geologists, power-cycle chemists and process engineers. Derivative properties (enthalpy, heat capacity and volume), which can be obtained from calorimetric and volumetric experiments, are useful in extrapolations when calculating the Gibbs energy at conditions remote from ambient. They also sensitively indicate evolution in molecular interactions with changing temperature and pressure. In this context, models with a sound theoretical basis are indispensable, describing with a limited number of adjustable parameters all thermodynamic functions of an aqueous system over a wide range of temperature and pressure. In thermodynamics of hydrothermal solutions, the unsymmetric standard-state convention is generally used; in this case, the standard thermodynamic properties (STP) of a solute reflect its interaction with the solvent (water), and the excess properties, related to activity coefficients, correspond to solute-solute interactions.
    [Show full text]
  • FUGACITY It Is Simply a Measure of Molar Gibbs Energy of a Real Gas
    FUGACITY It is simply a measure of molar Gibbs energy of a real gas . Modifying the simple equation for the chemical potential of an ideal gas by introducing the concept of a fugacity (f). The fugacity is an “ effective pressure” which forces the equation below to be true for real gases: θθθ f µµµ ,p( T) === µµµ (T) +++ RT ln where pθ = 1 atm pθθθ A plot of the chemical potential for an ideal and real gas is shown as a function of the pressure at constant temperature. The fugacity has the units of pressure. As the pressure approaches zero, the real gas approach the ideal gas behavior and f approaches the pressure. 1 If fugacity is an “effective pressure” i.e, the pressure that gives the right value for the chemical potential of a real gas. So, the only way we can get a value for it and hence for µµµ is from the gas pressure. Thus we must find the relation between the effective pressure f and the measured pressure p. let f = φ p φ is defined as the fugacity coefficient. φφφ is the “fudge factor” that modifies the actual measured pressure to give the true chemical potential of the real gas. By introducing φ we have just put off finding f directly. Thus, now we have to find φ. Substituting for φφφ in the above equation gives: p µ=µ+(p,T)θ (T) RT ln + RT ln φ=µ (ideal gas) + RT ln φ pθ µµµ(p,T) −−− µµµ(ideal gas ) === RT ln φφφ This equation shows that the difference in chemical potential between the real and ideal gas lies in the term RT ln φφφ.φ This is the term due to molecular interaction effects.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 8 Thermodynamic Properties of Mixtures
    Chapter 8 Thermodynamic Properties of Mixtures 2012/3/29 1 Abstract The thermodynamic description of mixtures, extended from pure fluids. The equations of change, i.e., energy and entropy balance, for mixtures are developed. The criteria for phase and chemical equilibrium in mixtures 2012/3/29 2 8.1 THE THERMODYNAMIC DESCRIPTION OF MIXTURES Thermodynamic property for pure fluids, θθ=()TPN , , where N is the number of moles. θθ=()TP , where the number of mole equals to 1. Thermodynamic property for mixtures, θθ=()TPN , ,12 , N ,L , Nc where Ni is the number of moles of the ith component. θθ=()TPx , ,12 , x ,L , xci where x is the mole fraction of the ith component. For example UUTPNN=() , ,12 , ,LL , Ncc or UUTPxx=() , , 12 , , , x VVTPNN=() , ,12 , ,L , Nc or VVTPxx=() , ,12 , ,L , xc 2012/3/29 3 Summation of the properties of pure fluids (before mixing at TP and ) C UTPxx(), ,12 , ,L , xci− 1= ∑ xUTPi () , (8.1-1) i=1 where UU is the molar internal energy, i is the internal energy of the pure i-th component at TP and . C ˆˆ UTPww()(), ,12 , ,L , wcii− 1= ∑ wUTP , (8.1-2) i=1 where wi is the mass fraction of component i. 2012/3/29 4 At the same T and P 50 cc 25 cc + 25 cc H2O H2O or 52 cc 25 cc + 25 cc 48 cc + 2 cc A B -2 cc Attractive Repulsive 2012/3/29 5 Property change upon mixing (at constantTP and ) C Δ=mixθθ()TPx,,ii −∑ x θi () TP , i=1 Volume change upon mixing C Δ=mixVTP(),,,, VTPx()ii −∑ xVTPi () i=1 Enthalpy change upon mixing C Δ=mix HTP(),,,, HTPx()ii −∑ xHTPi () i=1 2012/3/29 6 Experimental data : properties changes upon mixing (H and V) Figure 8.1-1 Enthalpy-concentration diagram for aqueous sulfuric acid at 0.1 MPa.
    [Show full text]
  • Selection of Thermodynamic Methods
    P & I Design Ltd Process Instrumentation Consultancy & Design 2 Reed Street, Gladstone Industrial Estate, Thornaby, TS17 7AF, United Kingdom. Tel. +44 (0) 1642 617444 Fax. +44 (0) 1642 616447 Web Site: www.pidesign.co.uk PROCESS MODELLING SELECTION OF THERMODYNAMIC METHODS by John E. Edwards [email protected] MNL031B 10/08 PAGE 1 OF 38 Process Modelling Selection of Thermodynamic Methods Contents 1.0 Introduction 2.0 Thermodynamic Fundamentals 2.1 Thermodynamic Energies 2.2 Gibbs Phase Rule 2.3 Enthalpy 2.4 Thermodynamics of Real Processes 3.0 System Phases 3.1 Single Phase Gas 3.2 Liquid Phase 3.3 Vapour liquid equilibrium 4.0 Chemical Reactions 4.1 Reaction Chemistry 4.2 Reaction Chemistry Applied 5.0 Summary Appendices I Enthalpy Calculations in CHEMCAD II Thermodynamic Model Synopsis – Vapor Liquid Equilibrium III Thermodynamic Model Selection – Application Tables IV K Model – Henry’s Law Review V Inert Gases and Infinitely Dilute Solutions VI Post Combustion Carbon Capture Thermodynamics VII Thermodynamic Guidance Note VIII Prediction of Physical Properties Figures 1 Ideal Solution Txy Diagram 2 Enthalpy Isobar 3 Thermodynamic Phases 4 van der Waals Equation of State 5 Relative Volatility in VLE Diagram 6 Azeotrope γ Value in VLE Diagram 7 VLE Diagram and Convergence Effects 8 CHEMCAD K and H Values Wizard 9 Thermodynamic Model Decision Tree 10 K Value and Enthalpy Models Selection Basis PAGE 2 OF 38 MNL 031B Issued November 2008, Prepared by J.E.Edwards of P & I Design Ltd, Teesside, UK www.pidesign.co.uk Process Modelling Selection of Thermodynamic Methods References 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Physical Chemistry
    Subject Chemistry Paper No and Title 10, Physical Chemistry- III (Classical Thermodynamics, Non-Equilibrium Thermodynamics, Surface chemistry, Fast kinetics) Module No and Title 10, Free energy functions and Partial molar properties Module Tag CHE_P10_M10 CHEMISTRY Paper No. 10: Physical Chemistry- III (Classical Thermodynamics, Non-Equilibrium Thermodynamics, Surface chemistry, Fast kinetics) Module No. 10: Free energy functions and Partial molar properties TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Learning outcomes 2. Introduction 3. Free energy functions 4. The effect of temperature and pressure on free energy 5. Maxwell’s Relations 6. Gibbs-Helmholtz equation 7. Partial molar properties 7.1 Partial molar volume 7.2 Partial molar Gibb’s free energy 8. Question 9. Summary CHEMISTRY Paper No. 10: Physical Chemistry- III (Classical Thermodynamics, Non-Equilibrium Thermodynamics, Surface chemistry, Fast kinetics) Module No. 10: Free energy functions and Partial molar properties 1. Learning outcomes After studying this module you shall be able to: Know about free energy functions i.e. Gibb’s free energy and work function Know the dependence of Gibbs free energy on temperature and pressure Learn about Gibb’s Helmholtz equation Learn different Maxwell relations Derive Gibb’s Duhem equation Determine partial molar volume through intercept method 2. Introduction Thermodynamics is used to determine the feasibility of the reaction, that is , whether the process is spontaneous or not. It is used to predict the direction in which the process will be spontaneous. Sign of internal energy alone cannot determine the spontaneity of a reaction. The concept of entropy was introduced in second law of thermodynamics. Whenever a process occurs spontaneously, then it is considered as an irreversible process.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture Outline
    LECTURE OUTLINE 1. Equilibrium of heterogeneous system 2. Phase transformations R&Y, Chapter 2 Salby, Chapter 4 C&W, Chapter 4 A Short Course in Cloud Physics, R.R. Rogers and M.K. Yau; R&Y Thermodynamics of Atmospheres Fundamentals of Atmospheric Physics, and Oceanes, M.L. Salby; Salby J.A. Curry and P.J. Webster; C&W 2 /25 LECTURE OUTLINE 1. Equilibrium of heterogeneous system 2. Phase transformations Equilibrium conditions for a homogeneous system: • thermal equilibrium • mechanical equilibrium (at most an infinitesimal pressure difference exists between the system and its environment). A heterogeneous system must also be in: • chemical equilibrium. No conversion of mass occurs from one phase to the other. Chemical equilibrium requires a certain state variables to have no difference between the phases present. 4 /30 For a homogeneous system, two intensive properties describe the thermodynamic state. Only two state variables may be varied independently, so a homogeneous system has two thermodynamic degrees of freedom. For a heterogeneous system, each phase may be regarded as a homogeneous sub-system, one that is ‚open’ due to exchanges with the other phases present. The number of intensive properties that describes the thermodynamic state is proportional to the number of phases present. However, thermodynamic equilibrium between phases introduces additional constraints that actually reduce the degrees of freedom of a heterogeneous system below those of a homogeneous system. The system we consider is a two-component mixture of: • dry
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Thermodynamics
    Chapter 1. The Phase-Equilibrium Problem Homogeneous phase: a region where the intensive properties are everywhere the same. Intensive property: a property that is independent of the size temperature, pressure, and composition, density(?) Gibbs phase rule ( no reaction) Number of independent intensive properties = Number of components – Number of phases + 2 e.g. for a two-component, two-phase system No. of intensive properties = 2 1.2 Application of Thermodynamics to Phase-Equilibrium Problem Chemical potential : Gibbs (1875) At equilibrium the chemical potential of each component must be the same in every phase. i i ? Fugacity, Activity: more convenient auxiliary functions 0 i yi P i xi fi fugacity coefficient activity coefficient fugacity at the standard state For ideal gas mixture, i 1 0 For ideal liquid mixture at low pressures, i 1, fi Psat In the general case Chapter 2. Classical Thermodynamics of Phase Equilibria For simplicity, we exclude surface effect, acceleration, gravitational or electromagnetic field, and chemical and nuclear reactions. 2.1 Homogeneous Closed Systems A closed system is one that does not exchange matter, but it may exchange energy. A combined statement of the first and second laws of thermodynamics dU TBdS – PEdV (2-2) U, S, V are state functions (whose value is independent of the previous history of the system). TB temperature of thermal bath, PE external pressure Equality holds for reversible process with TB = T, PE =P dU = TdS –PdV (2-3) and TdS = Qrev, PdV = Wrev U(S,V) is state function. The group of U, S, V is a fundamental group. Integrating over a reversible path, U is independent of the path of integration, and also independent of whether the system is maintained in a state of internal equilibrium or not during the actual process.
    [Show full text]
  • Equation of State. Fugacities of Gaseous Solutions
    ON THE THERMODYNAMICS OF SOLUTIONS. V k~ EQUATIONOF STATE. FUGACITIESOF GASEOUSSOLUTIONS' OTTO REDLICH AND J. N. S. KWONG Shell Development Company, Emeryville, California Received October 15, 1948 The calculation of fugacities from P-V-T data necessarily involves a differentia- tion with respect to the mole fraction. The fugacity rule of Lewis, which in effect would eliminate this differentiation, does not furnish a sufficient approximation. Algebraic representation of P-V-T data is desirable in view of the difficulty of nu- merical or graphical differentiation. An equation of state containing two individ- ual coefficients is proposed which furnishes satisfactory results above the critical temperature for any pressure. The dependence of the coefficients on the composi- tion of the gas is discussed. Relations and methods for the calculation of fugacities are derived which make full use of whatever data may be available. Abbreviated methods for moderate pressure are discussed. The old problem of the equation of state has a practical aspect which has become increasingly important in recent times. The systematic description of gas reactions under high pressure requires information about the fugacities, derived sometimes from extensive data but frequently from nothing more than t,he critical pressure and temperature. For practical purposes a representation of the relation between pressure, vol- ume, and temperature based on two or three individual coefficients is desirable, although a representation of this type satisfies the theorem of corresponding states and therefore cannot be accurate. Since the calculation of fugacities involves a differentiation with respect to the mole fraction, an algebraic repre- sentation by means of an equation of state appears to be desirable.
    [Show full text]
  • Fugacity of Condensed Media
    Fugacity of condensed media Leonid Makarov and Peter Komarov St. Petersburg State University of Telecommunications, Bolshevikov 22, 193382, St. Petersburg, Russia ABSTRACT Appearance of physical properties of objects is a basis for their detection in a media. Fugacity is a physical property of objects. Definition of estimations fugacity for different objects can be executed on model which principle of construction is considered in this paper. The model developed by us well-formed with classical definition fugacity and open up possibilities for calculation of physical parameter «fugacity» for elementary and compound substances. Keywords: fugacity, phase changes, thermodynamic model, stability, entropy. 1. INTRODUCTION The reality of world around is constructed of a plenty of the objects possessing physical properties. Du- ration of objects existence – their life time, is defined by individual physical and chemical parameters, and also states of a medium. In the most general case any object, under certain states, can be in one of three ag- gregative states - solid, liquid or gaseous. Conversion of object substance from one state in another refers to as phase change. Evaporation and sublimation of substance are examples of phase changes. Studying of aggregative states of substance can be carried out from a position of physics or on the basis of mathematical models. The physics of the condensed mediums has many practical problems which deci- sion helps to study complex processes of formation and destruction of medium objects. Natural process of object destruction can be characterized in parameter volatility – fugacity. For the first time fugacity as the settlement size used for an estimation of real gas properties, by means of the thermodynamic parities de- duced for ideal gases, was offered by Lewis in 1901.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 4. Thermodynamics [Ch. 2]
    Lecture 4. Thermodynamics [Ch. 2] • Energy, Entropy, and Availability Balances • Phase Equilibria - Fugacities and activity coefficients -K-values • Nonideal Thermodynamic Property Models - P-v-T equation-of-state models - Activity coefficient models • Selecting an Appropriate Model Thermodynamic Properties • Importance of thermodyyppnamic properties and equations in separation operations – Energy requirements (heat and work) – Phase equilibria : Separation limit – Equipment sizing • Property estimation – Specific volume, enthalpy, entropy, availability, fugacity, activity, etc. – Used for design calculations . Separator size and layout . AiliAuxiliary components : PiPipi ing, pumps, va lves, etc. EnergyEnergy,, Entropy and Availability Balances Heat transfer in and out Q ,T Q ,T in s out s OfdOne or more feed streams flowing into the system are … … separated into two or more prodttduct streams thtflthat flow Streams in out of the system. n,zi ,T,P,h,s,b,v : Separation : : : process n Molar flow rate : (system) : z Mole fraction Sirr , LW Streams out T Temperature n,zi ,T,P,h,s,b,v P Pressure h Molar enthalpy … … (Surroundings) s Molar entropy T b Molar availability 0 (W ) (W ) s in s out v Specific volume Shaft work in and out Energy Balance • Continuous and steady-state flow system • Kinetic, potential, and surface energy changes are neglected • First law of thermodynamics (conservation of energy) (stream enthalpy flows + heat transfer + shaft work)leaving system - (t(stream en thlthalpy flows +h+ hea ttt trans fer + s hfthaft wor k)entering
    [Show full text]
  • Thermodynamics, Experimental, and Modelling of Aqueous Electrolyte and Amino Acid Solutions
    Downloaded from orbit.dtu.dk on: Sep 26, 2021 Thermodynamics, Experimental, and Modelling of Aqueous Electrolyte and Amino Acid Solutions Breil, Martin Peter Publication date: 2001 Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link back to DTU Orbit Citation (APA): Breil, M. P. (2001). Thermodynamics, Experimental, and Modelling of Aqueous Electrolyte and Amino Acid Solutions. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Thermodynamics, Experimental, and Modelling of Aqueous Electrolyte and Amino Acid Solutions Martin P. Breil 2001 IVC-SEP Department of Chemical Engineering Technical University of Denmark DK-2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark Preface iii Preface This thesis is submitted as a partial fulfilment of the Ph.D. degree at the Technical University of Denmark. The project, granted by the IVC-SEP, has been carried out from October 1998 to September 2001 at the Department of Chemical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark under the supervision of Jørgen Mollerup.
    [Show full text]
  • Activity and Fugacity Ray Fu
    Activity and Fugacity Ray Fu Notation symbol description m, M intensive (molar) and extensive property of pure species mi, Mi as above, but specifically for species i m◦, mig, mid reference state, ideal gas, and ideal solution conditions msat saturation (liquid-vapor equilibrium) conditions mα, mβ, ml, mv α, β arbitrary and l, v liquid and vapor phases ^ f, ', fi,' ^i fugacity (coeffcient) of pure species and of species i in mixture xi, yi liquid and gas phase mole fraction of species i PT total pressure of mixture * a harder exercise Fugacity in the gas phase For an ideal gas, and assuming constant T and N, we have P dµ = dg = v dP () µ − µ◦ = g − g◦ = RT ln : (1) P ◦ Exercise 1 Prove the above identity. For non-ideal gases and fluids, we can extend this identity by defining an effective pressure f such that f f µ − µig =: RT ln = RT ln : (2) P ig f ig We call f the fugacity; it is the pressure that an ideal gas with the same chemical potential would have. By construction, f ig = P ig, and the second equality follows. The pressure P ig is the pressure of the (real) gas; the superscript ig reminds us that we are considering an ideal gas reference state. It is also convenient to define the fugacity coefficient ', satisfying 'P ig f =: 'P ig () µ − µig = RT ln = RT ln ': (3) P ig The fugacity coefficient ' contains no new thermodynamics. It simply hides all the complicated intermolec- ular interactions that real gases possess, and we can interpret it as a measure of a gas's deviation from ideality: the further the fugacity coefficient of a gas diverges from one, the less ideal is the gas.
    [Show full text]