DOCSLIB.ORG

Burke2019.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Burke2019.Pdf This thesis has been submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for a postgraduate degree (e.g. PhD, MPhil, DClinPsychol) at the University of Edinburgh. Please note the following terms and conditions of use: This work is protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights, which are retained by the thesis author, unless otherwise stated. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author. When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given. From Sayings to Texts: The Literary Contextualisation of Jesus’s Words in The Writings of Tertullian and Origen Simeon R. Burke Doctor of Philosophy New Testament and Christian Origins University of Edinburgh 2019 Declarations I confirm that this thesis presented for the degree of PhD, has i) been composed entirely by myself ii) been solely the result of my own work iii) not been submitted for any other degree or professional qualification Signed: Date: 16th October 2019 ii Table of Contents Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................... vi Abstract ......................................................................................................................................... viii Lay Abstract ................................................................................................................................... x Abbreviations ................................................................................................................................ xi Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 1 The Non-contextualisation of Moral Sayings in the Roman Period ..................... 5 1. Non-contextualisation among Tertullian and Origen’s Christian Contemporaries and Predecessors .................................................................................... 7 2. The Non-contextualisation of Moral Sayings: Tertullian and Origen’s Non- Christian Contemporaries and Predecessors ............................................................... 26 The Rise of Literary Contextualisation with Tertullian and Origen: The Argument of this Study ......................................................................................................... 31 Method .......................................................................................................................................... 35 Outline of the Chapters ......................................................................................................... 37 Chapter 1—Jesus’s Words as Climactic Pronouncements: Literary Contextualisation Through Anecdote Reproduction ............................................ 40 1.1. The Beginnings: Anecdote Reproduction in Early Christian Authors .... 42 1.2. The Evidence: Anecdote Reproduction in Tertullian and Origen’s Re-use of Jesus’s Words ....................................................................................................................... 48 1. “What, then, are ‘the things of Caesar’? They were, no doubt, those things which gave rise to the discussion” (Tertullian, De Idololatria 15) ....................... 49 2. “The reply must be pertinent to the purpose of the inquiry” (Tertullian, Adv. Marcionem 4.38.5) ................................................................................................................ 54 3. “…arising from the requirements of the situation” (Tertullian, Adv. Marc 4.19.11; De Carne Christi 7.12) ....................................................................................... 62 4. “He answers a particular question concerning it” (Tertullian, Adversus Marcionem 4.34.2) ................................................................................................................ 67 5. “For give attention to the fact that…it was being investigated if one must pay tax to Caesar or not” (Origen, Commentary on Matthew 17.25-6, on Matthew 22.15-22) .................................................................................................................................. 73 6.“So, the passage has a mystical and secret meaning” (Origen, Hom. In Lucam 39) ................................................................................................................................ 79 Conclusions ................................................................................................................................. 84 iii Chapter 2—Story and Saying: Literary Contextualisation Through Co- textual Reference ........................................................................................................................ 90 2.1. The Beginnings: Co-textual Reference in Early Christian Writers ........... 91 2.2. The Evidence: Co-textual Reference in Tertullian and Origen’s Re-use of Jesus’s Words ............................................................................................................................ 97 1. Reference to a Single Word from the Anecdote ..................................................... 101 2. Reference to Multiple Words from the Anecdote ................................................... 103 3. Reference to a Phrase from the Anecdote ............................................................... 109 4. Reference to the Setting of the Anecdote ................................................................. 113 5. Reference to the Genre/Similar Cases ..................................................................... 116 Excursus: Cases of Co-Textual Reference More Broadly in the Works of Tertullian and Origen ..................................................................................................... 118 2.3. The Hermeneutical Significance of Tertullian and Origen’s Practice of Co-Textual Reference ........................................................................................................... 127 1. The Development of Interpretive Methods for Reading Jesus’s Words: Story and Saying ............................................................................................................................. 127 2. The Exegetical Results: A New Type of Textual Boundedness .................. Error! Bookmark not defined. Conclusions ............................................................................................................................... 134 Chapter 3— Jesus’s Words as Scriptural Texts: Literary Contextualisation Through Intertextual Reference ............................................. 135 3.1. The Beginnings: Intertextual Reference in Early Christian Authors ...... 139 3.2. The Evidence: Intertextual Reference in Tertullian and Origen’s Re- Use of Jesus’s Words ............................................................................................................ 146 1. Intertextual References Deriving from the Co-Text ............................................. 147 2. Intertextual References Deriving from Jesus’s Words ....................................... 157 3.3. The Hermeneutical Significance of Tertullian and Origen’s Practice of Intertextual Reference ......................................................................................................... 162 1. The Development of Interpretive Methods for Reading Jesus’s Words: Scripture and Saying ................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. 2. The Exegetical Results: A New Type of Textual boundedness .................. Error! Bookmark not defined. Conclusions ............................................................................................................................... 169 iv Chapter 4—The Origins and Causes of the Hermeneutic of Literary Contextualisation: The Role of Literary, Historical and Ideological Factors ............................................................................................................................................ 171 4.1. Explaining Literary Non-contextualisation ........................................................ 172 1. Tertullian and Origen’s Explanations: Malevolent Motives and Mistrustful Methods .................................................................................................................................. 172 2. Roman Education and the Non-contextualisation of the Moral Sayings of the Sages ........................................................................................................................................ 176 3. Literary Explanations: Genre and Purpose ........................................................... 181 4.2. Explaining Literary Contextualisation ................................................................. 182 1. Historical Factors: Homeric Criticism, Rabbinic Exegesis of Scripture and Latin Rhetorical Treatises ................................................................................................ 183 2. Historical Factors: Roman Education and Grammatical Theory ................... 191 3. Literary Factors: The Role of the Commentary and Homily ............................. 195 4. Ideological
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Strength Needed to Enter the Kingdom of God
    Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament · 2. Reihe Herausgeber / Editor Jörg Frey (Zürich) Mitherausgeber/Associate Editors Markus Bockmuehl (Oxford) · James A. Kelhoffer (Uppsala) Tobias Nicklas (Regensburg) · Janet Spittler (Charlottesville, VA) J. Ross Wagner (Durham, NC) 485 Giuseppe G. Scollo The Strength Needed to Enter the Kingdom of God An Exegetical and Theological Study of Luke 16,16 in Context Mohr Siebeck Giuseppe G. Scollo, born 1978; 2000 Bachelor of Catholic Thought from St. Philip’s Seminary (Toronto); 2007 M.Div. from St. Augustine’s Seminary (Toronto); 2013 S.S.L. from the Ponti- fical Biblical Institute (Rome); 2018 S.T.D. from the Pontifical Gregorian University (Rome); currently vice-rector of the Redemptoris Mater Missionary Seminary of Toronto and assistant professor at St. Augustine’s Academic Faculty. ISBN 978-3-16-156859-6 / eISBN 978-3-16-156860-2 DOI 10.1628 / 978-3-16-156860-2 ISSN 0340-9570 / eISSN 2568-7484 (Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testa- ment, 2. Reihe) The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliographie; detailed bibliographic data are available on the Internet at http://dnb.dnb.de. © 2019 Mohr Siebeck Tübingen, Germany. www.mohrsiebeck.com This book may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, in any form (beyond that permitted by copyright law) without the publisher’s written permission. This applies particularly to repro- ductions, translations and storage and processing in electronic systems. The book was printed by Laupp & Göbel in Gomaringen on non-aging paper and bound by Buchbinderei Nädele in Nehren. BWLexs, Bwgrkn, Bwheba, and Bwhebb are fonts from BibleWorks, LLC.
    [Show full text]
  • The Principal Works of St. Jerome by St
    NPNF2-06. Jerome: The Principal Works of St. Jerome by St. Jerome About NPNF2-06. Jerome: The Principal Works of St. Jerome by St. Jerome Title: NPNF2-06. Jerome: The Principal Works of St. Jerome URL: http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf206.html Author(s): Jerome, St. Schaff, Philip (1819-1893) (Editor) Freemantle, M.A., The Hon. W.H. (Translator) Publisher: Grand Rapids, MI: Christian Classics Ethereal Library Print Basis: New York: Christian Literature Publishing Co., 1892 Source: Logos Inc. Rights: Public Domain Status: This volume has been carefully proofread and corrected. CCEL Subjects: All; Proofed; Early Church; LC Call no: BR60 LC Subjects: Christianity Early Christian Literature. Fathers of the Church, etc. NPNF2-06. Jerome: The Principal Works of St. Jerome St. Jerome Table of Contents About This Book. p. ii Title Page.. p. 1 Title Page.. p. 2 Translator©s Preface.. p. 3 Prolegomena to Jerome.. p. 4 Introductory.. p. 4 Contemporary History.. p. 4 Life of Jerome.. p. 10 The Writings of Jerome.. p. 22 Estimate of the Scope and Value of Jerome©s Writings.. p. 26 Character and Influence of Jerome.. p. 32 Chronological Tables of the Life and Times of St. Jerome A.D. 345-420.. p. 33 The Letters of St. Jerome.. p. 40 To Innocent.. p. 40 To Theodosius and the Rest of the Anchorites.. p. 44 To Rufinus the Monk.. p. 44 To Florentius.. p. 48 To Florentius.. p. 49 To Julian, a Deacon of Antioch.. p. 50 To Chromatius, Jovinus, and Eusebius.. p. 51 To Niceas, Sub-Deacon of Aquileia.
    [Show full text]
  • EARL 8/2 No. 2
    ATTRIDGE/VALENTINIAN AND SETHIAN APOCALYPSES 173 Valentinian and Sethian Apocalyptic Traditions* HAROLD W. ATTRIDGE The paper reexamines the relationship between “apocalyptic” and “gnostic” traditions, on the assumption that global definitions of these phenomena are problematic. Valentinian and Sethian corpora in the Nag Hammadi collection display different appropriations of apocalyptic literary forms and conceptual schemes. Apart from a few late works with traces of Valentinian positions, this tradition largely ignores features characteristic of apocalyptic literature. Valentinian eschatology seems to be founded primarily on philosophical cosmology and psychology. Sethian texts preserve many features of Jewish revelatory literature, and many details associated with various eschatological schemes familiar from apocalyptic sources. The most extensive use of the characteristic “heavenly ascent” topos in Sethian literature, however, seems to be a third-century development, perhaps responding to contemporary forms of religious propaganda. It has been almost forty years since R. M. Grant made his famous, and frequently discussed, suggestion that Gnosticism was born out of disap- pointed apocalyptic hopes.1 While containing an element of truth, the very formulation seems curiously dated. At the end of the millennium we are much more aware of the difficulties of dealing with each term of *A version of this paper was presented to the joint session of the Nag Hammadi and Pseudepigrapha groups at the annual meeting of the Society of Biblical Literature in Orlando, November 22, 1998. The subject of the joint session was the relationship of “apocalyptic” and “Gnosticism.” 1. Robert M. Grant, Gnosticism and Early Christianity (New York: Columbia University Press, 1959; rev. ed. 1966), 27–38.
    [Show full text]
  • A Commentary on Jerome's Contra Vigilantium by Amy
    A COMMENTARY ON JEROME’S CONTRA VIGILANTIUM BY AMY HYE OH DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Classical Philology with a concentration in Medieval Studies in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2013 Urbana, Illinois Doctoral Committee: Professor Danuta Shanzer Professor Ralph Mathisen Professor Jon Solomon Professor Stephan Heilan, University of Osnabrück ABSTRACT Innkeepers inspired this dissertation. After working on ‘innkeepers’ as a topic for a research seminar paper, I soon discovered that the term caupo counted as an insult according to several church fathers, including Jerome. In the Contra Vigilantium, Jerome mocked his enemy, Vigilantius, by calling him a caupo who mixed water with wine; I wondered whether the title was true and the insult was deserved. What remained was to figure out who this man was and why he mattered. The dissertation is comprised of four parts: introductory chapters, a text with an en face translation, a philological/historical commentary, and appendices. The first chapter introduces Vigilantius, discusses why a commentary of the Contra Vigilantium is needed, and provides a biography, supported by literary and historical evidence in response to the bolder and more fanciful account of W.S. Gilly.1 The second chapter treats Vigilantius as an exegete. From a sample of his exegesis preserved in Jerome’s Ep. 61, I determine that Jerome dismissed Vigilantius’ exegesis because he wanted to protect his own orthodoxy. The third chapter situates Vigilantius in the debate on relic worship. His position is valuable because he opposed most of his contemporaries, decrying relics instead of supporting their translation and veneration.
    [Show full text]
  • Conversion and Gnosis in the "Gospel of Truth"
    Haverford College Haverford Scholarship Faculty Publications Religion 1986 Conversion and gnosis in the "Gospel of Truth" Anne Marie McGuire Haverford College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.haverford.edu/religion_facpubs Repository Citation McGuire, Anne. "Conversion and Gnosis in the Gospel of Truth." Novum Testamentum 28 (1986): 338-55. This Journal Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Religion at Haverford Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Haverford Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Conversion and Gnosis in the "Gospel of Truth" Author(s): Anne McGuire Source: Novum Testamentum, Vol. 28, Fasc. 4 (Oct., 1986), pp. 338-355 Published by: BRILL Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1560588 . Accessed: 12/04/2013 12:13 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. BRILL is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Novum Testamentum. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 165.82.168.47 on Fri, 12 Apr 2013 12:13:11 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Novum Testamentum XXVIII, 4 (1986) CONVERSION AND GNOSIS IN THE GOSPEL OF TRUTH by ANNE McGUIRE Haverford College, Haverford, Pa.
    [Show full text]
  • Tertullian's Ideal Christian
    TERTULLIAN’S IDEAL CHRISTIAN: The Ideals of Persecution and Martyrdom in the True Christian Life By Robert Mooney A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Department of Religious Studies University of Alberta Robert Mooney, 2014 ii TERTULLIAN’S IDEAL CHRISTIAN: The Ideals of Persecution and Martyrdom in the True Christian Life ABSTRACT What mattered most to Tertullian was the fate of the Christian soul. During this early period in Christian history, the threat of persecution came to the forefront of Christian thought with a change in government leadership or opposition from other communities. To combat the fear of persecution and remain on the path towards salvation Tertullian saw a need for Christians to be distinct from other communities in Carthage. The development of this identity and why it may have been acceptable to the Carthaginian Christian community is the focus of this essay. To address Tertullian’s argument for the ideal Christian requires evidence to justify the ideal. Do events and attitudes from the past intertwine within the communities in Carthage and Africa during Tertullian’s life? Is Tertullian’s writing, much of which occurred between 196- 207 A.D.,1 consistent with the reports of past writers? This information would allow for a sympathetic look at his writing and intentions. The approach taken in this essay is to examine the development of Tertullian’s argument in six parts. The first will briefly examine the arrival of Christians in Africa and some of the influences on the adoption of a retributive Christianity.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gnostic Religion 1940 Joined the British Army in the Middle East
    THE MESSAGE OF THE ALIEN GOD & THE BEGINNINGS OF CHRISTIANITY Hans Jonas (1903-1993) was born and educated in Germany, where he was a pupil of Martin Heidegger and Rudolf Bult- mann. He left in 1933, when Hitler came into power, and in The Gnostic Religion 1940 joined the British Army in the Middle East. After the war he taught at Hebrew University in Jerusalem and Carleton Uni- versity in Ottawa, finally settling in the United States. He was the Alvin Johnson Professor of Philosophy on the Graduate Fac- HANS JONAS ulty of Political and Social Science at the New School for Social Research in New York. Professor Jonas was also author of, among other books, The Phenomenon of Life (1966). He died in 1993- THIRD EDITION BEACON PRESS BOSTON Beacon Press For Lore Jonas 25 Beacon Street Boston, Massachusetts 02108-2892 www.beacon.org Beacon Press books are published under the auspices of the Unitarian Universalist Association of Congregations. © 1958, 1963, 1991, 2001 by Hans Jonas All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America 05 04 03 02 01 00 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 This book is printed on acid-free paper that meets the uncoated paper ANSI/NISO specifications for permanence as revised in 1992. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Jonas, Hans The gnostic religion : the message of the alien God and the beginnings of Christianity / Hans Jonas.—3rd ed. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-8070-5801-7 (pbk.) I. Gnosticism I. Title BT1390 J62 2001 00-060852 273'.1— dc21 Scanned: February 2005 Contents Preface to the Third Edition xiii Note on the Occasion of the Third Printing (1970) xxx Preface to the Second Edition xxvi Preface to the First Edition xxxi Abbreviations xxxiii 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Confessions, by Augustine
    1 AUGUSTINE: CONFESSIONS Newly translated and edited by ALBERT C. OUTLER, Ph.D., D.D. Updated by Ted Hildebrandt, 2010 Gordon College, Wenham, MA Professor of Theology Perkins School of Theology Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Texas First published MCMLV; Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 55-5021 Printed in the United States of America Creator(s): Augustine, Saint, Bishop of Hippo (345-430) Outler, Albert C. (Translator and Editor) Print Basis: Philadelphia: Westminster Press [1955] (Library of Christian Classics, v. 7) Rights: Public Domain vid. www.ccel.org 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction . 11 I. The Retractations, II, 6 (A.D. 427) . 22 Book One . 24 Chapter 1: . 24 Chapter II: . 25 Chapter III: . 25 Chapter IV: . 26 Chapter V: . 27 Chapter VI: . 28 Chapter VII: . 31 Chapter VIII: . 33 Chapter IX: . 34 Chapter X: . 36 Chapter XI: . 37 Chapter XII: . 39 Chapter XIII: . 39 Chapter XIV: . 41 Chapter XV: . 42 Chapter XVI: . 42 Chapter XVII: . 44 Chapter XVIII: . 45 Chapter XIX: . 47 Notes for Book I: . 48 Book Two . .. 50 Chapter 1: . 50 Chapter II: . 50 Chapter III: . 52 Chapter IV: . 55 Chapter V: . 56 Chapter VI: . 57 Chapter VII: . 59 Chapter VIII: . 60 Chapter IX: . .. 61 3 Chapter X: . 62 Notes for Book II: . 63 Book Three . .. 64 Chapter 1: . 64 Chapter II: . 65 Chapter III: . 67 Chapter IV: . 68 Chapter V: . 69 Chapter VI: . 70 Chapter VII: . 72 Chapter VIII: . 74 Chapter IX: . .. 76 Chapter X: . 77 Chapter XI: . 78 Chapter XII: . 80 Notes for Book III: . 81 Book Four . 83 Chapter 1: . 83 Chapter II: . 84 Chapter III: .
    [Show full text]
  • De-Coding Mammon : Money in Need of Redemption
    1 DE-CODING MAMMON : MONEY IN NEED OF REDEMPTION Submitted by Peter John Dominy to the University of Exeter as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Theology November 2010 This thesis is available for Library use on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. I certify that all material in this thesis which is not my own work has been identified and that no material has previously been submitted and approved for the award of a degree by this or any other university. SIGNED...................................................................................... 2 Abstract This thesis is an attempt to understand the suspicion of money implied in Jesus' statement that it is impossible to serve both God and Mammon. I argue on the basis of Scripture, reason and tradition that problems associated with money do not arise simply from the way it is used, but from the nature of money itself. This is argued in three sections. First I consider the history of money and in particular of the commodity theory of money. Second I consider the issues of debt and interest, of central concern in the Christian Scriptures. Finally I consider money through four different lenses: justice, value, desire and power. The argument as a whole leads up to the last of these. As was already suggested by Jacques Ellul fifty years ago, I argue that money must be understood as a cosmic power to which we are all subject and which is in need of redemption. In the second and third sections I make suggestions as to what the redemption of money might look like.
    [Show full text]
  • The Diagram of the Ophites: a Synthesis
    16 Australian Religion Studies Review The Diagram of the Ophites: a Synthesis Mark A. Vassallo, University of New England The Ophite Diagram: The Plight for Restoration. The term 'Ophite' derived from the Greek ophis (serpent), rather than being a self-designation was a title imposed upon this Gnostic movement by Christian writers. 1 These early Church fathers, who allowed a significant bias to pervade their work, portrayed the Ophites as a cult of serpent worship; even though the serpent played a minor role within the Ophite religious system. 2 This essay will focus on the work of one such Christian heresiologist, especially his exposition of an important facet of the Ophite tradition; the Ophite diagram - a blueprint that was instrumental in the ritual life of the Ophites and which reflects many of the sentiments of Gnosticism at large. Scholars perceive the diagram of the Ophites "as the classic account of the Gnostic-initiatory ascent through the spheres".3 Serving a dual function (i) it provides a comprehensive view of the Ophite cosmos, which in tum, (ii) elaborates the path an initiate travelled for communion with the Supreme God. Although invaluable to Ophite religious practices, no original sketch of the diagram exists today.4 The only evidence we have of the Ophite's diagram is the brief extract in Contra Celsum, written by the eminent Church father, Origen, in refutation of the heretical material produced by Celsus the Epicurean. 5 Celsus familiarised his audience with the belief system of this Gnostic sect, including the ritual use of a diagram that he outlined in his work.6 Any documents produced by Celsus have long since vanished and the selected excerpts in Contra Cetsum are all that remains.
    [Show full text]
  • The True Mysteries: Sacramentalism in the "Gospel of Philip" Author(S): April D
    The True Mysteries: Sacramentalism in the "Gospel of Philip" Author(s): April D. DeConick Source: Vigiliae Christianae, Vol. 55, No. 3 (2001), pp. 225-261 Published by: BRILL Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1584809 . Accessed: 08/10/2013 15:05 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. BRILL is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Vigiliae Christianae. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 128.42.202.150 on Tue, 8 Oct 2013 15:05:39 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions THE TRUE MYs'rERIES SACRAMENTALISMIN THE GOSPELOF PHILIP' BY APRIL D. DECONICK Previous scholars of Philip have identified the sacraments (which they have understood to be ritual activities) as a particularly troublesome puz- zle. Thus ritual in Philip has been the subject of numerous important and intriguing academic studies over the last generation. Each of these studies has helped steadily advance our understanding of the subject, clarifying many of the problems connected with interpreting the Gospel of Philip.2 A rough draftof this paperwas presentedin 1998 to the EarlyJewish and Christian MysticismGroup at the annualmeeting of the Societyfor BiblicalLiterature.
    [Show full text]
  • Luke's Misreading in 16:9 of Two Hebrew Words
    LUKE’S MISREADING IN 16:9 OF TWO HEBREW WORDS © Thomas F. McDaniel, Ph.D. Professor Emeritus Palmer Theological Seminary Wynnewood, Pennsylvania INTRODUCTION According to Matt 6:19 Jesus said, “Lay not up for your- selves treasures upon earth,” but in Luke 16:9 Jesus said, “Make to yourselves friends of the mammon of unrighteous- ness.” The two imperatives are inconsistent, if not contra- dictory. A similar problem appears in Luke 14:26 where Jesus said, “If any one comes to me and does not hate his own father and mother and wife and children and brothers and sisters, yes, and even his own life, he cannot be my disciple.” But in Matt 22:39, Mark 12:31, and Luke 10:27 Jesus de- clared that Lev 19:18, “you shall love your neighbor ([;re = kith-and-kin) as yourself,” was the second greatest command- ment, exceed only by the commandment to love God. A third problem appears in Matt 10:34–36, where the Prince of Peace —having stated in Matt 5:9, “Blessed are the peacemakers: for they shall be called the children of God”—announced, “Do not think that I have come to bring peace to the earth; I have not come to bring peace, but a sword.” And yet there is no record that Jesus ever touched a sword. I have already published my interpretation of the difficult sayings in Luke 14:26 and Matt 10:34, in which I conclude that a few statements of Jesus were mistranslated when they went from Hebrew into Greek.1 The clarity of Hebrew speech can readily be lost when, as was the custom, Hebrew spelling 2 LUKE’S MISREADING IN 16:9 did not use vowels.
    [Show full text]