Target Archery Marshal’S Handbook July 2020
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Traditional Bow Rules
NAA National Traditional Target Archery Championship Rules and Procedures: The NAA Board of Governors (BOG) at its October 1996 meeting adopted a resolution to begin holding a National Traditional Target Archery Championship in conjunction with the NAA National Target Championship. The Championship includes the following elements: Competitions: The Traditional Target Archery Championship will be held on the weekend prior to the beginning of the main NAA outdoor nationals. Competition will consist of a York Round for men, A Hereford Round for women, A Cloud round for men and women, and an American round for men and women as follows: A York Round for men: 72 arrows at 100 yds, 48 arrows at 80 yds. and 24 arrows at 60 yds. (122 cm / 48 in. multicolor target face) A Hereford Round for women: 72 arrows at 80 yds, 48 arrows at 60 yds. and 24 arrows at 50 yd. (122 cm / 48 in. multicolor target face) A Clout Round Men, 36 arrows at 180 yd. /165 meters Women 36 arrows at 125 meters (Target to be 5 concentric circles marked on the ground, each scoring band measuring 1.5 meters in radius and with the outer most circle diameter measuring 15 meters in diameter; the scoring is 5-4-3-2-1} 0 to 1.5 meter radius, 5 points (3 meter diameter) 1.5 to 3 meter radius, 4 points (6 meter diameter) 3 to 4.5 meter radius, 3 points (9 meter diameter) 4.5 to 6 meter radius, 2 points (12 meter diameter) 6 to 7.5 meter radius, 1 point (15 meter diameter) An American Round: 30 arrows at 60 yds, 30 arrows at 50 yds. -
Report on the Arti- 1999:216)
REPORT CULTURAL MATERIALS RECOVERED FROM ICE PATCHES IN THE DENALI HIGHWAY REGION , CENTRAL ALASKA , 2003–2005 Richard VanderHoek Office of History and Archaeology, Alaska Department of Natural Resources, 550 W. Seventh Ave., Suite 1310, Anchorage, AK 99501-3565; [email protected] Randolph M. Tedor Office of History and Archaeology, Alaska Department of Natural Resources J. David McMahan Office of History and Archaeology, Alaska Department of Natural Resources ABSTRACT The Alaska Office of History and Archaeology conducted ice patch surveys in the Denali Highway re- gion of central Alaska for three seasons. Prehistoric organic and lithic hunting artifacts and fauna had melted from the ice patches and were subsequently recovered. These items include arrow shafts, barbed antler points, lithic projectile points, and what is likely a stick for setting ground squirrel snares. Or- ganic artifacts recovered from this survey date within the last thousand years. Lithic projectile points recovered from ice patches suggest that prehistoric hunters have been hunting caribou on ice patches in the Denali Highway region for at least the last half of the Holocene. keywords: atlatl, bow and arrow, gopher stick, mountain archaeology INTRODUCTION Ice patches with caribou (Rangifer tarandus) dung and cul- al. 2005; Hare et al. 2004a, Hare et al. 2004b). To date, tural material were first noted by the scientific commu- more than 240 artifacts have been recovered from melting nity in August of 1997, when a Canadian biologist noticed ice patches and glaciers in northwestern North America. a layer of caribou dung on a permanent ice patch while In 2003, the Alaska Office of History and Archaeology sheep hunting in the Kusawa Lake area of the southern (OHA) developed a research design for identifying and Yukon Territory (Kuzyk et al. -
UC Berkeley Berkeley Undergraduate Journal of Classics
UC Berkeley Berkeley Undergraduate Journal of Classics Title Bow Designs on Ancient Greek Vases Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3rh4f9jd Journal Berkeley Undergraduate Journal of Classics, 5(2) ISSN 2373-7115 Author Bowyer, Emily S Publication Date 2017 Peer reviewed|Undergraduate eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Bow Designs on Ancient Greek Vases Emily Bowyer University of California, Los Angeles Classical Civilizations Class of 2017 Abstract: This research looks to investigate the designs of ancient bows depicted on ancient Greek pottery. The goal is to show that the bows most commonly shown are not native to the Greek mainland but rather are from Scythia and Egypt. This has been done by examining a number of vases, pyramid friezes, and modern bow reconstructions. The common use of the Scythian design for archer characters in scenes of myth implies a familiarity with archery primarily through the Scythian mercenaries. The Egyptian acacia deflex bow design, while rare in vase depictions, directly corresponds to images on pyramids. The Egyptian angular composite bow appears in a rare case on a Greek vase, but its depiction is consistent with modern historical reconstructions. Through showing these non-native bow origins, this paper hopes to further demonstrate the worldly influences on archaic Greece. The practice of archery is ancient, as is its depiction in art. Analysis of the bow’s form provides a unique insight into the ancient world. This is because a culture’s bow design is a direct reflection of its environment. From the single-piece English Yew longbow to the massive Japanese Yumi to the compact Mongolian horse bow, the available materials dictate the form of the tool. -
Bone, Stone and Shell Technology
Bone, Stone and 4.1 Shell Technology A Clovis point. The PROJECTILE POINTS ‘flute’ or channel up Projectile points changed through an atlatl or throwing stick, which greatly the middle of the time as prey and hunting technologies increased the power of the throw. (For point was for hafting onto a spear; deep more information on the atlatl, visit changed. Paleoindian Clovis points were flutes occur only on attached to long spears, and were used www.worldatlatl.org.) Because darts Paleolithic points. to hunt Pleistocene period megafauna were not easily retrieved, dart points like the mastodon. Spear points were were expendable—they were quickly Scallorn arrow point. This is often exquisitely crafted from non- and roughly made from readily available one of the earlier arrow points. native stone and were probably closely native stone. This technology lasted over It resembles a dart point in shape conserved. By 10,000 B.C., a more modern 6,000 years in Louisiana, and was still in but is smaller. climate developed and modern fauna use by some Mexican Indians at Contact. appeared. Long spears and spear points However, between A.D. 500 and 700, the Bone, Stone and were replaced by smaller darts and dart bow, arrow, and arrowhead replaced the Shell Technology points. The darts were propelled using atlatl, dart, and dart point in Louisiana. Bone fishing hooks. These hooks were 4.3 Kent point. Used from generally crafted from deer long bones. SUBSISTENCE the middle of the Archaic Considering the dependence of most TECHNOLOGIES through the Marksville cultures on fishing, fish hooks are periods, these points are uncommon. -
Risk Assessment
Target Archery: Competition Risk Assessment Function: Competition Target Archery Club: Exmouth Archers Location/site of Withycombe Raleigh Common, Date Assessment 3rd July 2021 activity: Exmouth carried out: Groups at risk: Club Members and Visiting Archers Version Number: V3 Name: Positions: Persons carrying Timothy Pratt Club Chairman and Tournament Organiser out assessment: Should Covid-19 government or Archery GB Date of acceptance Planned review guidance change. 3rd July 2021 and publication: date: Should Archery return to normal in the UK then this assessment will no longer apply. ‘Social Distancing & Staying Safe is everyone’s responsibility’ Archery GB: Competition Risk Assessment v1.0 1 Target Archery: Competition Risk Assessment Risk Who is at Like- with Hazards Consequences Severity Risk Control Measure risk lihood Control Measure Symptomatic Archers or Family members of the Archer The Archer has Risk of infection to other MUST refrain from coming to the Archery All 3 3 6 1 Symptoms of Covid-19 people Range. Government Guidance Must be or other infectious Followed disease Archer MUST refrain from coming to the I have had symptoms of Risk of infection to other All 3 3 6 Archery Range and Facilities for at least 7 1 Covid-19 people Days. Someone in my family is Archer MUST refrain from coming to the Risk of infection to other symptomatic with Covid- All 3 3 6 Archery Range and Facilities for at least 14 1 people 19 but I am well. Days. Should you become ill whilst you are at the Archery Range, you MUST inform someone Becoming ill whilst on Risk of infection to other that you do so and immediately leave the All 3 3 6 1 the Archery Range. -
Kyudo - the Way of the Bow
Kyudo - the Way of the Bow Centuries ago in Japan, archery was regarded as the highest discipline of the Samurai warrior. Then, as the bow lost its significance as a weapon of war, and under the influence of Buddhism, Shinto, Daoism and Confucianism, Japanese archery evolved into Kyudo, the "Way of the Bow", a powerful and highly refined contemplative practice. Kyudo, as taught by Kanjuro Shibata XX, is not a competitive sport and marksmanship is regarded as relatively unimportant. According to Shibata Sensei, a master of the Heki Ryu Bishu Chikurin-ha school of Kyudo, the ultimate goal of Kyudo is to polish the mind - the same as in sitting meditation. "One is not polishing one's shooting style or technique, but the mind. The dignity of shooting is the important point. This is how Kyudo differs from the common approach to Kanjuro Shibata Sensei at Kai. (ca. 1990) archery. In Kyudo there is no hope. Hope is not the point. The point is that through long which the practitioner has the opportunity to and genuine practice your natural dignity as see the mind more clearly. The target a human being comes out. This natural becomes a mirror which reflects the qualities dignity is already in you, but it is covered up of heart and mind at the moment of the by a lot of obstacles. When they are cleared arrow's release. away, your natural dignity is allowed to This distinguishes Kyudo from archery shine forth" - Shibata Sensei. where simply hitting the target is the goal. Chogyam Trungpa the renowned Tibetan Kyudo is "Standing meditation", and as meditation master said, "Through Kyudo one such, is a true contemplative art. -
Martial Arts from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia for Other Uses, See Martial Arts (Disambiguation)
Martial arts From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia For other uses, see Martial arts (disambiguation). This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (November 2011) Martial arts are extensive systems of codified practices and traditions of combat, practiced for a variety of reasons, including self-defense, competition, physical health and fitness, as well as mental and spiritual development. The term martial art has become heavily associated with the fighting arts of eastern Asia, but was originally used in regard to the combat systems of Europe as early as the 1550s. An English fencing manual of 1639 used the term in reference specifically to the "Science and Art" of swordplay. The term is ultimately derived from Latin, martial arts being the "Arts of Mars," the Roman god of war.[1] Some martial arts are considered 'traditional' and tied to an ethnic, cultural or religious background, while others are modern systems developed either by a founder or an association. Contents [hide] • 1 Variation and scope ○ 1.1 By technical focus ○ 1.2 By application or intent • 2 History ○ 2.1 Historical martial arts ○ 2.2 Folk styles ○ 2.3 Modern history • 3 Testing and competition ○ 3.1 Light- and medium-contact ○ 3.2 Full-contact ○ 3.3 Martial Sport • 4 Health and fitness benefits • 5 Self-defense, military and law enforcement applications • 6 Martial arts industry • 7 See also ○ 7.1 Equipment • 8 References • 9 External links [edit] Variation and scope Martial arts may be categorized along a variety of criteria, including: • Traditional or historical arts and contemporary styles of folk wrestling vs. -
All These Fantastic Cultures? Research History and Regionalization in the Late Palaeolithic Tanged Point Cultures of Eastern Europe
European Journal of Archaeology 23 (2) 2020, 162–185 This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), which permits non- commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the same Creative Commons licence is included and the original work is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use. All these Fantastic Cultures? Research History and Regionalization in the Late Palaeolithic Tanged Point Cultures of Eastern Europe 1 2 3 LIVIJA IVANOVAITĖ ,KAMIL SERWATKA ,CHRISTIAN STEVEN HOGGARD , 4 5 FLORIAN SAUER AND FELIX RIEDE 1Museum of Copenhagen, Denmark 2Archaeological and Ethnographic Museum of Łódź, Poland 3University of Southampton, United Kingdom 4University of Cologne, Köln, Germany 5Aarhus University, Højbjerg, Denmark The Late Glacial, that is the period from the first pronounced warming after the Last Glacial Maximum to the beginning of the Holocene (c. 16,000–11,700 cal BP), is traditionally viewed as a time when northern Europe was being recolonized and Late Palaeolithic cultures diversified. These cultures are characterized by particular artefact types, or the co-occurrence or specific relative frequencies of these. In north-eastern Europe, numerous cultures have been proposed on the basis of supposedly different tanged points. This practice of naming new cultural units based on these perceived differences has been repeatedly critiqued, but robust alternatives have rarely been offered. Here, we review the taxonomic landscape of Late Palaeolithic large tanged point cultures in eastern Europe as currently envisaged, which leads us to be cautious about the epistemological validity of many of the constituent groups. -
Setting up an Archery Range
Setting up an Archery Range 1 Updated March 2014 How to set up an archery range Content: Introduction ....................................................................................................... 2 Rules for designing a safe target archery range ............................................ 3-4 Outdoor shooting grounds ................................................................................. 4 Outdoor field orientation .................................................................................. 5 Outdoor field of play with safety zones ......................................................... 5-6 Outdoor field of play with reduced safety zones .......................................... 6-7 Indoor shooting range .................................................................................... 7-8 Field, Clout and Flight archery ..................................................................... 9-10 Setting out a competition target archery range ........................................ 10-12 Further reading ............................................................................................... 10 Introduction Archery is practiced all over the world. As with other sports, a special area is needed for practice and competition. Bow and arrows are part of the equipment of an archer; an archery range on a flat level field is needed for the safe practice of target archery. In field archery the ground is mostly far from level, however in this discipline there exist special rules for range layout. The specialist -
A Reconstruction of the Greek–Roman Repeating Catapult
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Archivio della ricerca - Università degli studi di Napoli Federico II Mechanism and Machine Theory 45 (2010) 36–45 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Mechanism and Machine Theory journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/mechmt A reconstruction of the Greek–Roman repeating catapult Cesare Rossi *, Flavio Russo Department of Mechanical Engineering for Energetics (DIME), University of Naples ‘‘Federico II”, Via Claudio, 21, 80125 Naples, Italy article info abstract Article history: An ‘‘automatic” repeating weapon used by the Roman army is presented. Firstly a short Received 21 February 2009 description is shown of the working principle of the torsion motor that powered the Received in revised form 17 July 2009 Greek–Roman catapults. This is followed by the description of the reconstructions of these Accepted 29 July 2009 ancient weapons made by those scientists who studied repeating catapults. The authors Available online 4 September 2009 then propose their own reconstruction. The latter differs from the previous ones because it proposes a different working cycle that is almost automatic and much safer for the oper- Keywords: ators. The authors based their reconstruction of the weapon starting from the work of pre- History of Engineering vious scientists and on their own translation of the original text (in ancient Greek) by Ancient automatic weapons Mechanism reconstruction Philon of Byzantium. Ó 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction Among the designers of automata and automatic devices in ancient times Heron of Alexandria (10 B.C.–70 A.D.) was probably the best known. -
Asian Traditions of Wellness
BACKGROUND PAPER Asian Traditions of Wellness Gerard Bodeker DISCLAIMER This background paper was prepared for the report Asian Development Outlook 2020 Update: Wellness in Worrying Times. It is made available here to communicate the results of the underlying research work with the least possible delay. The manuscript of this paper therefore has not been prepared in accordance with the procedures appropriate to formally-edited texts. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this paper do not necessarily reflect the views of the Asian Development Bank (ADB), its Board of Governors, or the governments they represent. The ADB does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this document and accepts no responsibility for any consequence of their use. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by ADB in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. Any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area, or use of the term “country” in this document, is not intended to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. Boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this document do not imply any judgment on the part of the ADB concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. ASIAN TRADITIONS OF WELLNESS Gerard Bodeker, PhD Contents I. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................. -
Hosting a Hunting- Based Outdoor Skills Event in Your Community
Learning to Hunt Hosting a hunting- based outdoor skills event in your community Mary Kay Salwey, Ph.D. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources 2004 Station Learning to HuntCredits 15Project Director With Stick and StringMary Kay Salwey, Ph.D. Wisconsin DNR Bureau of Wildlife Management Box 7921 Madison, WI 53707-7921 Editorial Assistance Nancy Williams Carrie L. Armus Artwork Eric DeBoer Mary Kay Salwey Dynamic Graphics Cindie Brunner Photos Robert Queen Mary Kay Salwey Mike Roach Design Concept Blue Raven Graphics Electronic Layout Mary Kay Salwey, Wisconsin DNR Published by Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. Copyright 2004 by Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Madison, Wisconsin. All original illustrations copyrighted. This book is educational in nature and not-for-profit. It is intended to inspire organizations to pass the tradition of hunting down to younger generations. However, all rights are reserved, including the right to reproduce this book or any part thereof in any form except brief quotations for reviews, without the written permission of the publisher. 184 Station Hosting an Outdoor Skills Clinic in Your Community 15 With Stick & With Stick and String String Participants learn the basic Bowhunting basics parts of bows and arrows. They try their hand at shooting a recurve or compound bow and learn some techniques for hunting deer. 185 Station Learning to Hunt 15 Objectives Equipment With Stick and String Participants shall: Bows– recurve, longbow, compound, in various describe the difference weights between a recurve bow, Arrows of various types longbow and compound bow. Arm guards, finger tabs or finger gloves, quivers demonstrate the safe and Hunting arrowheads – blunt, accurate use of a recurve or target, broadhead, fixed and compound bow.