Community Governance Review Final Recommendations

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Community Governance Review Final Recommendations Cheshire West and Chester Council Community Governance Review Final Recommendations (October 2014) Community Governance Review A – Z Compendium of Final Recommendations by parished area Civil Parishes Appendix Page Acton Bridge 1 6 Agden 2 7 Aldersey 3 8-9 Aldford 4 10 Allostock 5 11 Alvanley 6 12 Anderton with Marbury 7 13 Antrobus 8 14 Ashton Hayes 9 15 Aston 10 16 Bache 11 17 Backford 12 18 Barnton 13 19 Barrow 14 20 Barton 3 8-9 Beeston 15 21 Bickley 16 22-23 Bostock 17 24 Bradley 18 25 Bridge Trafford 19 26 Broxton 20 27 Bruen Stapleford 21 28 Buerton 4 10 Burton 22 29 Burwardsley 23 30 Byley 24 31 Caldecott 25 32 Capenhurst 26 33 Carden 3 8-9 Caughall 12 18 Chester Castle (not under review) Chidlow 27 34-35 Chorlton 28 36 Chorlton-by-Backford 12 18 Chowley 29 37 Christleton 30 38 Church Shocklach 25 32 Churton Heath 4 10 2 Civil Parishes Appendix Page Churton-by-Aldford 31 39 Churton-by-Farndon 31 39 Claverton 32 40 Clotton Hoofield 33 41 Clutton 3 8-9 Coddington 3 8-9 Comberbach 34 42 Cotton Abbotts 35 43 Cotton Edmunds 30 38 Crewe-by-Farndon 36 44 Croughton 37 45 Crowton 38 46 Cuddington (Malpas) 39 47 Cuddington (Weaver & Cuddington) 40 48-49 Darnhall 41 50 Davenham 42 51 Delamere 43 52-53 Dodleston 44 54 Duckington 20 27 Duddon 22 29 Dunham Hill 45 55 Dutton 46 56 Eaton 32 40 Eccleston 32 40 Edge 16 22-23 Edgerley 31 39 Elton 47 57 Farndon 36 44 Foulk Stapleford 48 58-59 Frodsham 49 60 Golbourne Bellow 50 61-62 Golbourne David 29 37 Grafton 51 63 Great Boughton 52 64 Great Budworth 53 65 Guilden Sutton 54 66 Hampton 16 22-23 Handley 29 37 Hapsford 45 55 Hartford 55 67 Harthill 20 27 Hatton 48 58-59 Helsby 56 68 Hockenhull 21 28 3 Civil Parishes Appendix Page Hoole Village 19 26 Horton-by-Malpas 25 32 Horton-cum-Peel 9 15 Huntington 57 69 Huxley 48 58-59 Iddinshall 33 41 Ince 58 70 Kelsall 59 71 Kings Marsh 36 44 Kingsley 60 72 Kingsmead (not under review) Lach Dennis 61 73 Larkton 16 22-23 Lea Newbold 4 10 Lea-by-Backford 62 74 Ledsham 26 33 Little Budworth 63 75 Little Leigh 64 76 Little Stanney 37 45 Littleton 65 77 Lostock Gralam 66 78 Lower Kinnerton 44 54 Macefen 18 25 Malpas 27 34-35 Manley 67 79 Marlston-cum-Lache 44 54 Marston 68 80 Mickle Trafford 19 26 Mollington 69 81 Moston 11 17 Mouldsworth 70 82 Moulton 71 83 Nether Peover 72 84 Neston (not under review) Newton by Malpas 27 34-35 Newton-by-Tattenhall 50 61-62 Norley 73 85 Northwich (not under review) Oakmere 43 52-53 Oldcastle 27 34-35 Overton 27 34-35 Picton 19 26 Poulton 74 86 Prior’s Heys 21 28 4 Civil Parishes Appendix Page Puddington 75 87 Pulford 74 86 Rowton 76 88 Rudheath 77 89 Rushton 78 90 Saighton 4 10 Saughall 79 91 Shocklach Oviatt 25 32 Shotwick 75 87 Shotwick Park 79 91 Sproston 80 92 Stanthorne 81 93 Stoke 37 45 Stockton 27 34-35 Stretton 3 8-9 Sutton 82 94 Tarporley 83 95 Tarvin 21 28 Tattenhall 50 61-62 Thornton-le-Moors 84 96 Threapwood 85 97 Tilston 51 63 Tilstone Fearnall 86 98 Tiverton 86 98 Tushingham-cum-Grindley 18 25 Upton by Chester 11 17 Utkinton 87 99 Waverton 35 43 Weaverham 88 100 Wervin 37 45 Whitegate and Marton 89 101 Whitley 90 102 Wigland 27 34-35 Willington 91 103 Wimbolds Trafford 19 26 Wimboldsley 92 104 Wincham 93 105 Winsford (not under review) Woodbank 75 87 Wychough 27 34-35 5 Appendix 1 Final Recommendations for the Community Governance Review of Acton Bridge parish Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Act 2007 That: 1) the boundary of the existing parish of Acton Bridge be redrawn to the north at Pickering’s Cut to transfer the land between the Dutton Viaduct and The Bungalow from Dutton parish to Acton Bridge parish; 2) the boundary of the existing parish of Acton Bridge be redrawn to the east, south of Acton Swing Bridge to transfer the island of the Weaver Navigation Canal from Little Leigh parish to Acton Bridge parish; 3) the boundary of the existing parish of Acton Bridge be redrawn to the south-east at the A49 / Sandy Lane to transfer the property of Kinsale from Acton Bridge parish to Weaverham parish; 4) the boundary of the existing parish of Acton Bridge be redrawn to the south at Grange Brook to transfer the property of Grange Brook Farm from Weaverham parish to Acton Bridge parish; 5) the boundary of the existing parish of Acton Bridge be redrawn to the west at Acton Mill to transfer the property of The Grange from Acton Bridge parish to Crowton parish; 6) the parish of Acton Bridge should not be abolished; 7) the name of the parish of Acton Bridge should not be altered; 8) the parish should continue to have a parish council; 9) no changes be made to the electoral arrangements that apply to the parish council; and 10) a Cheshire West and Chester Borough Council (Reorganisation of Community Governance) Order be prepared in accordance with the above recommendations and that the Order be effective from 1 April 2015. 6 Appendix 2 Final Recommendations for the Community Governance Review of Agden parish Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Act 2007 That: 1) the parish of Agden should not be abolished and that its area should not be altered; 2) the name of the parish should not be altered; 3) the parish should not have a parish council; 4) no new parish should be constituted through the aggregation of part of Agden parish with another or amalgamation of the whole of Agden parish with another; and 5) no grouping provision be made in relation to Agden parish. 7 Appendix 3 Final Recommendations for the Community Governance Review of Aldersey, Barton, Carden, Clutton, Coddington and Stretton parishes Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Act 2007 That: 1) the parish of Aldersey should not be abolished and that its area should not be altered; 2) the name of the parish of Aldersey should not be altered; 3) the parish of Barton should not be abolished and that its area should not be altered; 4) the name of the parish of Barton should not be altered; 5) the boundary of the existing parish of Carden be redrawn along Barton Road, Broxton Road and Carden Lane to transfer the properties of The Forge (Carden Smithy), Huntsman's House, Carden Smithy, The Lodge, Carden Ridge and Rose Cottage from Clutton to Carden parish; 6) the name of the parish of Carden should not be altered; 7) the boundary of the existing parish of Clutton be redrawn along Barton Road, Broxton Road and Carden Lane to transfer the properties of The Forge (Carden Smithy), Huntsman's House, Carden Smithy, The Lodge, Carden Ridge and Rose Cottage from Clutton to Carden parish; 8) the name of the parish of Clutton should not be altered; 9) the parish of Coddington should not be abolished and that its area should not be altered; 10) the name of the parish of Coddington should not be altered; 11) the parish of Stretton should not be abolished and that its area should not be altered; 12) the name of the parish of Stretton should not be altered; 13) the parishes of Aldersey, Barton, Carden, Clutton, Coddington and Stretton should continue to be grouped under a common parish council – Coddington and District; 14) the parish council for the parishes of Aldersey, Barton, Carden, Clutton, Coddington and Stretton consist of seven members; 15) one councillor be elected for each of the parishes of Aldersey, Barton, Carden, Coddington and Stretton; 16) two councillors be elected for the parish of Clutton; 17) a Cheshire West and Chester Borough Council (Reorganisation of Community Governance) Order be prepared in accordance with the above recommendations and that the Order be effective from 1 April 2015 save for those recommendations relating to parish electoral 8 arrangements which shall come into force on the ordinary day of election of councillors in May 2015; and 18) the community governance arrangements for Aldersey, Barton, Carden, Clutton, Coddington and Stretton parishes be reviewed in advance of the local elections scheduled to take place in 2019. 9 Appendix 4 Final Recommendations for the Community Governance Review of Aldford, Buerton, Churton Heath, Lea Newbold and Saighton parishes Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Act 2007 That: 1) the grouping of the existing parishes of Aldford, Buerton, Churton Heath, Lea Newbold and Saighton under the single common council of Aldford, Saighton and District be dissolved; 2) the boundary of the existing parish of Saighton be redrawn along the A41 Whitchurch Road to transfer West View House from Saighton parish to Hatton parish; 3) the parishes of Aldford, Buerton, Churton Heath, Lea Newbold and Saighton be amalgamated to constitute a new single parish comprising the area of those parishes; 4) the new parish shall be known as Aldford and Saighton; 5) in consequence of paragraph (iii) above, the existing parishes of Aldford, Buerton, Churton Heath, Lea Newbold and Saighton shall cease to exist; 6) a new local council for the area be created; 7) the local council for the area adopt the style of “parish”; 8) the parish council for the parish of Aldford and Saighton consist of eight members; and 9) a Cheshire West and Chester Borough Council (Reorganisation of Community Governance) Order 2013 be prepared in accordance with the above recommendations and that the Order be effective from 1 April 2015 save for those recommendations relating to parish electoral arrangements which shall come into force on the ordinary day of election of councillors in May 2015.
Recommended publications
  • Re-Routing of Access to St. Edith's Church, Shocklach
    Chapel Archaeology CIC Archaeological Desktop Study Re-Routing of Access to St. Edith’s Church, Shocklach For Community Interest March, 2017 Archaeological Desktop Study Re-Routing of Access to St. Edith’s Church, Shocklach Client Community benefit/interest Location Site Code Author(s) C. E. Barnwell Doc. Ref. D:\Shocklach\Tracks\Tracks_Final.vp Date 10 March 2017 Chapel Archaeology CIC 143, Hough Green, CHESTER, CH4 8JR. 07426 92 44 93. [email protected]. www.chapelarchaeology.co.uk Copyright Notice Unless otherwise stated, Copyright © 2017 Chapel Archaeology CIC. Desktop Study: Access to St Edith’s, Shocklach ii 10 March 2017 The potential re-routing of access to St Edith’s church, Shocklach One method of tracing former boundaries and track ways in the landscape is to look at the angles of existing field boundaries and their anomalies. These may reveal echoes of previous field shape, size or orientation. The modern approach to St Edith’s church down Church Road has a dog leg shape with two right-angled bends. This is not logical, as there is no apparent need for this road shape. The road does not go round an obstacle and does not appear to align with anything in the landscape. According to Peter Burdett’s 1777 map1 of Shocklach, there was a track way running east directly north of St Edith’s church to a crossroads and then following on in a north- easterly direction towards Grafton Hall. (See below). Church Road, with its distinctive corners, is not marked. Part of Burdett's 1777 map of Church Shocklach Part of the 1839 Tithe Map for Church Shocklach The track on Burdett’s map does not appear on Greenwood’s 1819 map of Church Shocklach, Bryant’s 1831 map or the tithe map of 1839 (see above), which show the present road with the dog leg.
    [Show full text]
  • FARNDON 'Tilstone Fearnall' 1970 'Tiverton' 1971
    Earlier titles in this series of histories of Cheshire villages are:— 'Alpraham' 1969 FARNDON 'Tilstone Fearnall' 1970 'Tiverton' 1971 By Frank A. Latham. 'Tarporley' 1973 'Cuddington & Sandiway' 1975 'Tattenhall' 1977 'Christleton' 1979 The History of a Cheshire Village By Local History Groups. Edited by Frank A. Latham. CONTENTS Page FARNDON Foreword 6 Editor's Preface 7 PART I 9 An Introduction to Farndon 11 Research Organiser and Editor In the Beginning 12 Prehistory 13 FRANK A. LATHAM The Coming of the Romans 16 The Dark Ages 18 The Local History Group Conquest 23 MARIE ALCOCK Plantagenet and Tudor 27 LIZ CAPLIN Civil War 33 A. J. CAPLIN The Age of Enlightenment 40 RUPERT CAPPER The Victorians 50 HAROLD T. CORNES Modern Times JENNIFER COX BARBARA DAVIES PART II JENNY HINCKLEY Church and Chapel 59 ARTHUR H. KING Strawberries and Cream 66 HAZEL MORGAN Commerce 71 THOMAS W. SIMON Education 75 CONSTANCE UNSWORTH Village Inns 79 HELEN VYSE MARGARET WILLIS Sports and Pastimes 83 The Bridge 89 Illustrations, Photographs and Maps by A. J. CAPLIN Barnston of Crewe Hill 93 Houses 100 Natural History 106 'On Farndon's Bridge' 112 Published by the Local History Group 1981 and printed by Herald Printers (Whitchurch) Ltd., Whitchurch, Shropshire. APPENDICES Second Edition reprinted in 1985 113 ISBN 0 901993 04 2 Hearth Tax Returns 1664 Houses and their Occupants — The Last Hundred Years 115 The Incumbents 118 The War Memorial 119 AH rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, The Parish Council 120 electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the editor, F.
    [Show full text]
  • CHESHIRE. FAR 753 Barber William, Astbury, Congleton Barratt .Ambrose, Brookhouse Green, Ibay!Ey :Mrs
    TRADES DlliECTORY. J CHESHIRE. FAR 753 Barber William, Astbury, Congleton Barratt .Ambrose, Brookhouse green, IBay!ey :Mrs. Mary Ann, The Warren, Barber William, Applet-on, Warrington Smallwo'Jd, Stoke-·on-Trent Gawsworth, Macclesfield Barber William, Buxton stoops. BarraH Clement, Brookhouse green, Beach J. Stockton Heath, Warrington Rainow, Macolesfield Sr.aallwood, Stoke-on-Trent Bean William, Acton, Northwich Barber W. Cheadle Hulme, Stockport Barratt Daniel. Brookhouse green, Beard· Misses Catherine & Ann, Pott; Bard'sley D. Hough hill, Dukinfield Smallwood, Stoke-on-Trent • Shrigley, Macclesfield Bardsley G. Oheadle Hulme, Stockprt Bal"''att J. Bolt's grn.Betchton,Sndbch Beard J. Harrop fold, Harrop,Mcclsfld Bardsley Jas, Heat<m Moor, Stockport Barratt Jn. Lindow common, :Marley, Beard James, Upper end, LymeHand- Bardsley Ralph, Stocks, :Kettleshulme, Wilmslow, Manchester ley, Stockport Macclesfield Barratt J. Love la. Betchton,Sand'bch Beard James, Wrights, Kettleshulme, Bardsley T. Range road, Stalybrid•ge Barratt T.Love la. Betchton, Sandb~h Macclesfield Bardsley W. Cheadle Hulme, Stckpri Barrow Mrs. A. Appleton, Warrington Beard James, jun. Lowe!l" end, Lyme Barff Arthnr, Warburton, Wa"flringtn Barrow Jn.Broom gn. Marthall,Kntsfd Handley, Stockport Barker E. Ivy mnt. Spurstow,Tarprly Ball'row Jonathan, BroadJ lane, Grap- Beard J.Beacon, Compstall, Stockport Barker M~. G. Brereton, Sandbach penhall, Warrington Beard R. Black HI. G~. Tascal,Stckpr1i Barker Henry, Wardle, Nantwich Barrow J. Styal, Handforth, )I'chestr Beard Samuel, High lane, StockpGri Barker Jas. Alsager, Stoke-upon-Trnt Barton Alfred, Roundy lane, .Adling- Be<bbington E. & Son, Olucastle, Malps Barker John, Byley, :Middlewich ton, :Macclesfield Bebbington Oha.rles, Tarporley Barker John, Rushton, Tall'porley Barton C.Brown ho.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Plan (Part Two) Land Allocations and Detailed Policies
    Cheshire West & Chester Council Local Plan (Part Two) Land Allocations and Detailed Policies Submission March 2018 Visit: cheshirewestandchester.gov.uk Cheshire Local Plan (Part Two) Land Allocations and Detailed Policies W est 1 Introduction 6 and 2 Chester 11 Chester CH 1 - Chester settlement area 12 Council CH 2 - Chester regeneration areas 13 CH 3 - Employment land provision in Chester 17 Local CH 4 - University of Chester 18 Plan CH 5 - Chester conservation areas 19 (Part CH 6 - Chester key views, landmarks and gateways and historic skyline 22 T wo) 3 Ellesmere Port 25 Land EP 1 - Ellesmere Port settlement area 26 Allocations EP 2 - Employment land provision in Ellesmere Port 27 EP 3 - Stanlow special policy area 33 and EP 4 - Hooton Park 36 Detailed EP 5 - Thornton Science Park 38 Policies EP 6 - Ince Park 40 EP 7 - Ellesmere Port historic canal port 42 Submission 4 Northwich 44 N 1 - Northwich settlement area 44 N 2 - Northwich regeneration areas 45 N 3 - Meeting the outstanding housing requirement in Northwich 49 N 4 - Employment land provision in Northwich 51 N 5 - Gadbrook Park 52 N 6 - Northwich conservation area 54 5 Winsford 56 W 1 - Winsford settlement area 56 W 2 - Employment land provision in Winsford 58 Contents Cheshire 6 Rural area 60 R 1 - Development in the rural area 60 W est R 2 - Meeting the outstanding housing requirement in Tattenhall 63 and R 3 - Employment land provision in the rural area 66 Chester 7 Green Belt and countryside 71 Council GBC 1 - Commercial sites in the Green Belt 72 GBC 2 - Protection of landscape
    [Show full text]
  • Youth Arts Audit: West Cheshire and Chester: Including Districts of Chester, Ellesmere Port and Neston and Vale Royal 2008
    YOUTH ARTS AUDIT: WEST CHESHIRE AND CHESTER: INCLUDING DISTRICTS OF CHESTER, ELLESMERE PORT AND NESTON AND VALE ROYAL 2008 This project is part of a wider pan Cheshire audit of youth arts supported by Arts Council England-North West and Cheshire County Council Angela Chappell; Strategic Development Officer (Arts & Young People) Chester Performs; 55-57 Watergate Row South, Chester, CH1 2LE Email: [email protected] Tel: 01244 409113 Fax: 01244 401697 Website: www.chesterperforms.com 1 YOUTH ARTS AUDIT: WEST CHESHIRE AND CHESTER JANUARY-SUMMER 2008 CONTENTS PAGES 1 - 2. FOREWORD PAGES 3 – 4. WEST CHESHIRE AND CHESTER PAGES 3 - 18. CHESTER PAGES 19 – 33. ELLESMERE PORT & NESTON PAGES 34 – 55. VALE ROYAL INTRODUCTION 2 This document details Youth arts activity and organisations in West Cheshire and Chester is presented in this document on a district-by-district basis. This project is part of a wider pan Cheshire audit of youth arts including; a separate document also for East Cheshire, a sub-regional and county wide audit in Cheshire as well as a report analysis recommendations for youth arts for the future. This also precedes the new structure of Cheshire’s two county unitary authorities following LGR into East and West Cheshire and Chester, which will come into being in April 2009 An audit of this kind will never be fully accurate, comprehensive and up-to-date. Some data will be out-of-date or incorrect as soon as it’s printed or written, and we apologise for any errors or omissions. The youth arts audit aims to produce a snapshot of the activity that takes place in West Cheshire provided by the many arts, culture and youth organisations based in the county in the spring and summer of 2008– we hope it is a fair and balanced picture, giving a reasonable impression of the scale and scope of youth arts activities, organisations and opportunities – but it is not entirely exhaustive and does not claim to be.
    [Show full text]
  • Shocklach Oviatt Church of England Primary School Inspection Report
    Shocklach Oviatt Church of England Primary School Inspection report Unique Reference Number 111283 Local authority Cheshire West and Chester Inspection number 325336 Inspection dates 29–30 April 2009 Reporting inspector Mr Roger Gill The inspection was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005 under pilot arrangements; it was also deemed a section 5 inspection under the same Act. Type of school Primary School category Voluntary controlled Age range of pupils 4–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number on roll School (total) 58 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Mrs Kate Soragna Headteacher Mrs Kathryn Hinchliffe Date of previous school inspection March 2006 School address Shocklach Malpas SY14 7BN Telephone number 01829 250285 Fax number 01829 250673 Email address [email protected] Age group 4–11 Inspection date(s) 29–30 April 2009 Inspection number 325336 Inspection report: Shocklach Oviatt CofE Primary School, 29–30 April 2009 © Crown copyright 2009 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. Inspection report: Shocklach Oviatt CofE Primary School, 29–30 April 2009 3 of 11 Introduction This pilot inspection was carried out by one additional inspector.
    [Show full text]
  • BARTON of BARTON St George's Visitation of Lancashire Recorded in 1613 That Edmond Lathom (Father of George Lathom of Huyton A
    BARTON of BARTON St George’s Visitation of Lancashire recorded in 1613 that Edmond Lathom (father of George Lathom of Huyton and son of Thomas Latham) had been married to ‘Petronill, daughter of George Massy [recte Mascy] of Rixton’.1 Edmund Latham was probably born to Thomas Latham by c. 1441 and married Petronill Massey by 1462.2 According to a ‘Descent of the Mascys of Rixton’,3 George Mascy was a son of Hamon Mascy, third Mascy lord of Rixton. St George showed George Mascy’s wife as ‘Katherine, daughter and heire of Oliver Barton’. This was perhaps Oliver de Barton (born c. 1385), who succeeded his nephew in his estates at Barton (Farndon parish), Cheshire in 1435–6.4 Confusion seems likely, however, since the Mascy and Latham families also had interests in lands at Barton in the Lancashire parish of Eccles. On 6 March 1448 George Mascy was a deforciant (with one Oliver Barton, surely his alleged father–in–law) in the sale for 100 marks of six messuages and 316 acres in Barton, Irlam, Rivington and West Leigh, all in Lancashire.5 Oliver Barton was married to Eleanor, who acted against Edmund Latham and George Mascy in 1473 to regain her third part of 200 acres in Barton.6 On St James Day 1473 the Lancaster plea roll records the claim of ‘Ellen Barton’ to a third of five messuages, 200 acres of land, 6 acres of meadow, 40 acres of wood, 100 acres of moss, and 1000 acres of pasture, which had been her dower.
    [Show full text]
  • Descendant Chart of Thomas Warburton
    Descendant Chart of John Warburton Thomas Warburton (buried 1730) b. 1816, Tattenhall, Cheshire John Warburton Samuel Warburton d. aft 1851 John Warburton b. 1729, Shocklach, Cheshire b. 1769, Tilston, Cheshire & Isabella Tyson b. abt 1849, Liverpool, Lancashire b. abt 1817, Whiehaven, Cumberland of Shocklach m. 1840, Liverpool, St Anne, Lancashire Mary Warburton b. 1771, Tilston, Cheshire Edward Warburton b. 1818, Tattenhall, Cheshire Ann(e) Warburton Dorothy Elma Warburton b. 1826, Tattenhall, Cheshire b. 8 Dec 1890, Liverpool, Lancashire & George Worrall d. 17 Nov 1964, Aukland, New Zealand d. bef 1871 & Owen Jones m. 1846, Liverpool Register Office, or Registrar attended b. abt 1878 d. 21 Aug 1921 m. 28 Mar 1914, Wallasey, St Hilda, Cheshire Thomas Warburton b. 1828, Tattenhall, Cheshire Thomas Alfred Warburton d. 2 Mar 1902 b. 9 Oct 1866, Douglas, Isle of Man Thomas Douglas Warburton & Elizabeth Aykroyd d. 10 Oct 1936 b. 17 May 1905, Liverpool, Lancashire b. 11 Oct 1828, Melbourne, Lancashire & Eleanor Caroline Almond d. 14 Nov 1993 d. 1894 b. abt 1868, Liverpool, Lancashire & Kathleen Mary Chase m. 18 Apr 1851, Liverpool, Lancashire m. 11 Jan 1890, Tuebrook, St John the Baptist, Lancashire b. 10 Aug 1915 d. 29 Nov 1982 m. 1947, Wirral, Cheshire William Warburton b. 1830, Liverpool, Lancashire & Ann Gurney Brian Richard Warburton b. abt 1813, Peel, Isle of Man b. 1 Jan 1907, Bidston, Cheshire d. 1883, Douglas, isle of Man d. Nov 1999, Winchester, Hampshire m. 20 Sep 1853, Braddan, Isle of Man Margaret Warburton Samuel Warburton Richard Warburton b. 1852, Liverpool, Lancashire b. 1 Dec 1793, Tattenhall, Cheshire b.
    [Show full text]
  • Areas Designated As 'Rural' for Right to Buy Purposes
    Areas designated as 'Rural' for right to buy purposes Region District Designated areas Date designated East Rutland the parishes of Ashwell, Ayston, Barleythorpe, Barrow, 17 March Midlands Barrowden, Beaumont Chase, Belton, Bisbrooke, Braunston, 2004 Brooke, Burley, Caldecott, Clipsham, Cottesmore, Edith SI 2004/418 Weston, Egleton, Empingham, Essendine, Exton, Glaston, Great Casterton, Greetham, Gunthorpe, Hambelton, Horn, Ketton, Langham, Leighfield, Little Casterton, Lyddington, Lyndon, Manton, Market Overton, Martinsthorpe, Morcott, Normanton, North Luffenham, Pickworth, Pilton, Preston, Ridlington, Ryhall, Seaton, South Luffenham, Stoke Dry, Stretton, Teigh, Thistleton, Thorpe by Water, Tickencote, Tinwell, Tixover, Wardley, Whissendine, Whitwell, Wing. East of North Norfolk the whole district, with the exception of the parishes of 15 February England Cromer, Fakenham, Holt, North Walsham and Sheringham 1982 SI 1982/21 East of Kings Lynn and the parishes of Anmer, Bagthorpe with Barmer, Barton 17 March England West Norfolk Bendish, Barwick, Bawsey, Bircham, Boughton, Brancaster, 2004 Burnham Market, Burnham Norton, Burnham Overy, SI 2004/418 Burnham Thorpe, Castle Acre, Castle Rising, Choseley, Clenchwarton, Congham, Crimplesham, Denver, Docking, Downham West, East Rudham, East Walton, East Winch, Emneth, Feltwell, Fincham, Flitcham cum Appleton, Fordham, Fring, Gayton, Great Massingham, Grimston, Harpley, Hilgay, Hillington, Hockwold-Cum-Wilton, Holme- Next-The-Sea, Houghton, Ingoldisthorpe, Leziate, Little Massingham, Marham, Marshland
    [Show full text]
  • Cycle of Prayer
    Cycle of Prayer 08 September 2019 - 11 January 2020 Diocese of Chester Key: C = Clergy LM = Licensed Lay Minister (Reader) (Pastoral Worker) (Youth Worker) Diocesan entries from the Anglican Cycle of Prayer are in italics. Chester Diocesan Board of Finance. Church House, 5500 Daresbury Park, Daresbury, Warrington WA4 4GE. Tel: 01928 718834 Chester Diocesan Board of Finance is a company limited by guarantee registered in England (no. 7826) Registered charity (no. 248968) Foreword I’ll never forget, after a long walk with my Dad, in Pendle, Lancashire, sipping a pint in a pub and chatting to the locals. Five minutes later I was surprised to turn to see my Dad placing his arthritic hand into the dirty palms of a particularly burly local farmer as they bowed their heads in prayer. I didn’t quite know where to look or what to do, so I lowered my head and kept quiet. It seemed like the right thing to do, and it helped me avoid the gaze of the growing number of amused boozy onlookers. That was my first and slightly embarrassing introduction to prayer. Since then I’ve travelled a long way, but I still remember the first tentative steps I took for myself. I also remember just how uncomfortable and alien praying felt to me. For those well versed in the lifelong discipline of prayer, it can perhaps be easy to forget just how strange the whole thing can be to start. I am grateful to one good colleague from many years ago who shared with me the William Temple quote: ‘When I pray, coincidences happen, when I don’t they don’t.’ As you pray during this period, please pray for those who are just starting and giving it a go.
    [Show full text]
  • In This Issue: Choose Your Top 3 Hymns; Sponsor the Leap of Faith Free Defibrillator Training Clic Ipad Workshop “H” Bars on the High Street and More
    In this issue: Choose your top 3 hymns; Sponsor the Leap of Faith Free Defibrillator training CLiC iPad workshop “H” Bars on the High Street and more .. Churches engaging with the community [email protected] www.handleychurch.co.uk 1 FRUSTRATED WITH YOUR COMPUTER or iPAD/TABLET? If it hasn’t clicked yet - try CLiC (Computer Learning in the Community) Come Along To Our COMPUTER CLUB at The Barbour Institute, Tattenhall Every Wednesday 12 Noon – 3.00pm Friendly Atmosphere Come for a FREE Taster Contact Mrs Colony Keane 07956027460 For more details – www.clicbi.co.uk St Albans House Church Bank Tattenhall Chester CH3 9QE The firm commenced in 1960 and has served businesses in the North West since then, providing Accountancy, Audit, Taxation, Payroll Services and Business Advisory Services to small and medium sized businesses, charities, clubs and individuals. [email protected] 2 25 FROM THE RECTOR Barbour Institute, one for each person Sometimes items are stolen and attending. This is held every Tuesday discarded that are of no value to the “And where are you going this Summer?” 10am – 12noon, all are welcome so thief but of great sentimental value to come along for a chat and sort out the you. Think about it; what have you got This is He who was spoken of through the prophet Isaiah: "A voice of one calling in the worlds problems with endless cuppas to lose. desert, ’Prepare the way for the Lord, make straight paths for him.’” Matt. 3.3 and biscuits for 50p per person, along If you would like to be included in our with security advice thrown in for e-mail HomeWatch updates contact John the Baptist was commissioned by the Lord to prepare the way for the coming of free (Community Safety Wardens on list, send your details Christ.
    [Show full text]
  • Chowley, Golborne David and Handley Notice of Decision
    Community Governance Review of Chowley, Golborne David and Handley parishes Notice of Decision Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Act 2007 Cheshire West and Chester Borough Council has decided to what extent it will give effect to the recommendations made in the Community Governance Review of the parishes of Chowley, Golborne David and Handley. The decision is that: (1) the parish of Chowley not be abolished and that its area should not be altered; (2) the name of the parish of Chowley not be altered; (3) the parish of Golborne David not be abolished; (4) the boundary of the existing parish of Golborne David be redrawn along Chester Road to transfer Laburnum House from Hatton parish to Golborne David parish; (5) the name of the parish of Golborne David not be altered; (6) the parish of Handley not be abolished and that its area should not be altered; (7) the name of the parish of Handley not be altered; (8) the parishes of Chowley, Golborne David and Handley continue to be grouped under a common parish council; (9) no changes be made to the electoral arrangements that apply to the parish council; and (10) a Cheshire West and Chester Borough Council (Reorganisation of Community Governance) Order 2013 be prepared in accordance with the above recommendations and that the Order be effective from 1 April 2015. Reasons for the decision The Council has made this decision in order to determine more appropriate parish boundaries which better reflect the identities and interests of local residents and are more closely tied to visible and firm ground detail.
    [Show full text]