Local Authority Areas (31/03/2009)

Copy Link

Local Authority Areas (31/03/2009) Local Authority Boundary Changes 1 April 2009 Background On 1 April 2009, there will be a reorganisation of local government that will create nine new unitary authorities (UAs). Five of these will be created from existing county councils and their district councils. The remaining four will be created by splitting Cheshire and Bedfordshire into two each along existing district council boundaries. The nine unitary authorities will, therefore, all be aggregates of existing local authorities. Further details of the reorganisation are shown below: • Bedford UA will be formed from Bedford District Council • Central Bedfordshire UA will be formed from Mid Beds and South Beds District Councils. • Cheshire East UA will be formed from Congleton, Crewe & Nantwich and Macclesfield District Councils. • Cheshire West and Chester UA will be formed from Chester, Ellesmere Port and Vale Royal District Councils. • Cornwall UA will be formed from the Caradon, Carrick, Kerrier, North Cornwall, Penwith and Restormel District Councils (note the Isles of Scilly remains separate). • County Durham UA will be formed from Chester-le-Street, Derwentside, Durham, Easington, Sedgefield, Teesdale and Wear Valley District Councils. • Northumberland UA will be formed from Alnwick, Berwick-upon-Tweed, Blyth Valley, Castle Morpeth, Tynedale and Wansbeck District Councils. • Shropshire UA will be formed from Bridgnorth, North Shropshire, Oswestry, Shrewsbury and South Shropshire District Councils. • Wiltshire UA will be formed from Kennet, North Wiltshire, Salisbury and West Wiltshire District Councils. Changes in Nomis Wizard/Advanced Queries. Nomis will update the two local authorities geographies on 1 April to represent the new unitary authority areas. The pre-reorganisation geographies will be renamed pre- 2009 local authorities and moved to the historical heading. Users wanting to access data for the district areas abolished in the reorganisation should use these historical geographies - in wizard queries, select historical from the drop-down selection box to see these areas. Local Authority Profiles. Profiles are available for both the new UAs and old pre-organisation areas. www.nomisweb.co.uk - 01/10/2021 (page 1 of 1).

Recommended publications

Quarter 7 Duplicate Removal Process

Quarter 7 Duplicate Removal Process Guidance Total number of records submitted via the web tool (ie Stroke / All records (of any diagnosis) for patients who arrived at hospital TIA / Other) between 1 October 2012 and 31 December 2013 which were locked on the SINAP web tool by 21 January 2013. Number of stroke records submitted via the web tool As above, except that stroke was the diagnosis (as opposed to TIA/Other). Total number of records after cleaning (ie duplicate removals) Records assumed to be duplicates are those that have all of the following fields identical: hospital, date of patient arrival at hospital, gender, age and diagnosis. This may mean that some records that were not real duplicates are removed, but this is proportionally only a small number of those removed, whereas the vast majority will be duplicates. This has been identified as the most appropriate method for removing duplicate records. Percentage of records submitted included after cleaning The percentage represents the proportion of records included in the quarter 7 report after the data cleaning process, this is listed below as total records and stroke records. Total Percentage Percentage Stroke Stroke Total number of number of of stroke of all records records records records submitted records records submitted submitted included SHA Trust Hospital via the webtool in included submitted included in via the after Quarter 7 after included in Quarter 7 webtool in cleaning (Stroke/TIA/Other) cleaning Quarter 7 Report Quarter 7 Quarter 7 Quarter 7 Report East Chesterfield
Holidays & Short Breaks

Tynedale Group Travel Holidays & Short Breaks 2021 www.tgtholidays.co.uk Tour Programme 2021 A TGT Gift Voucher is the perfect present DEPARTURE TOUR DAYS PAGE and can be used as full or part 5 May Isle of Man, History & Heritage 5 Days 6 payment for any of our holidays. 31 May Llandrindod Wells & Heart of Wales 5 Days 6 They are a great way to mark 6 June Dolphins, Drams, Castles & Cairngorms 5 Days 7 Birthdays, Mother’s Day, Father’s Day, Anniversaries, Christmas etc. 13 June Barnstaple & Devon Delights 6 Days 7 or just as a special thank you. 20 June Antrim Coast & The Giants Causeway 5 Days 8 Please call 01434 322944 to 27 June Stratford and The Picturesque Cotswolds 5 Days 8 place your order (min £20). 3 July Regal Scotland 'Castles & Drams' 5 Days 9 10 July Llandudno and Snowdonia 5 Days 9 28 July Sidmouth & Devon Coast 7 Days 10 8 August Cheshire Luxury Break 3 Days 10 11 August Cornish Delights 6 Days 11 23 August Norfolk Broads ‘Steam & Cruise’ 5 Days 11 28 August Downton Abbey & Hampshire Cream Tea 4 Days 12 12 September Ireland, Bantry Bay & Garnish Island 7 Days 12 23 September Cheddar Gorge, Bath & Wells 5 Days 13 30 September Gloucester - Waterways, Railways & Cream Teas 5 Days 13 26 October Pitlochry, The Enchanted Forest & Autumn Tints 5 Days 14 11 November All Inclusive Scottish Winter Wonderland 5 Days 14 17 November Festive Chatsworth & Christmas Markets 3 Days 15 21 November All Inclusive Turkey & Tinsel Inverness 5 Days 15 28 November Thursford Christmas Spectacular 3 Days 16 15 December Holly & Mistletoe Festive Break in Llandudno 5 Days 16 The above package tours are organised by TGT Holidays Ltd.
Draft Topic Paper 5: Natural Environment/Biodiversity

Wiltshire Local Development Framework Working towards a Core Strategy for Wiltshire Draft topic paper 5: Natural environment/biodiversity Wiltshire Core Strategy Consultation June 2011 Wiltshire Council Information about Wiltshire Council services can be made available on request in other languages including BSL and formats such as large print and audio. Please contact the council on 0300 456 0100, by textphone on 01225 712500 or by email on [email protected]. Wiltshire Core Strategy Natural Environment Topic Paper 1 This paper is one of 18 topic papers, listed below, which form part of the evidence base in support of the emerging Wiltshire Core Strategy. These topic papers have been produced in order to present a coordinated view of some of the main evidence that has been considered in drafting the emerging Core Strategy. It is hoped that this will make it easier to understand how we had reached our conclusions. The papers are all available from the council website: Topic Paper TP1: Climate Change TP2: Housing TP3: Settlement Strategy TP4: Rural Issues (signposting paper) TP5: Natural Environment/Biodiversity TP6: Water Management/Flooding TP7: Retail TP8: Economy TP9: Planning Obligations TP10: Built and Historic Environment TP11:Transport TP12: Infrastructure TP13: Green Infrastructure TP14:Site Selection Process TP15:Military Issues TP16:Building Resilient Communities TP17: Housing Requirement Technical Paper TP18: Gypsy and Travellers 2 Table of Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................5
THE LONDON GAZETTE, 3 JUNE, 1924. 4447 in the County of Lancaster

THE LONDON GAZETTE, 3 JUNE, 1924. 4447 In the county of Lancaster. 8. An Area comprising: — The county boroughs of St. Helens and In the county of Gloucester. Warrington. The borough of Leigh. The petty sessional division of Campden. The petty sessional division of Warrington, In the county of Oxford. and The parishes of Claydon, Clattercote, The parishes of Bold, Ashton-in-Makerfield, Mollington, Copredy, Bourton, Hamwell, Abram, Lowton, Kenyon, and Culcheth. Horley, Hornton, Wroxton, Dray ton, North Newington, East Shutford, West Shutford, In the county of Salop. Swalcliffe, Sibford Ferris, Sibford Gower, The borough of Oswestry. Epwell, Shenington, and Alkerton. The petty sessional division of Oswestry, and In the county of Northampton. The parishes of Ellesmere Rural, Bllesmere The borough of Daventry. Urban, Welshampton, Whitchurch Rural, Whitchurch Urban, Ightfield, and Ruyton of The petty sessional division of Daventry, the Eleven Towns. and The parishes of Upper Boddington, Lower In the county of Denbigh. Boddington, Bugbrooke, Kislingbury, Upton, The borough of Wrexham, and Harpole, Upper Heyford, Nether Hey ford, The petty sessional divisions of Bromfield, Floore, Brington, Althorp, Harlestone, Church liuabon, and Brampton, Chapel Brampton, Spratton, Holdenby, East Haddon, Ravensthorpe, The parish of Chirk. Teeton, Great Creaton, Cottesbrooke, Hollo- In the county of Flint. well, Coton, Guilsborough, Thornby, Cold The petty sessional divisions of Hope, and Ashby, Welford, Sulby, Hothorpe, Marston Overton, and the detached part of the petty Trussell, Sibertoft, Olipston, Naseby, Hasel- sessional division of Hawarden. bech, Kelmarsh, and Maidwell. 6. An Area comprising: — In the county of Worcester. In the couniy of Stafford. The borough of Stourbridge.
Judicial Review Portfolio Holders

Appendix Title: Local Government Re-organisation – Judicial Review Portfolio Holders: Cllr Graham Payne, Leader Cllr Rod Eaton, Change and Integration Portfolio Holder Reporting Officer: Nicola Mathiason - Head of Legal and Democratic Services Andrew Pate - Chief Executive Key Decision: No ______________________________________________________________ Purpose • To decide whether to redirect the Council's legal efforts and resources, from a separate judicial review, to support for the Shrewsbury and Atcham and Congleton appeal. Background • On 8 August 2007 Cabinet agreed that the Council should commence legal proceedings for Judicial Review against the Secretary of State’s decision about Local Government Reorganisation in Wiltshire. The Council’s case has been ‘on hold’ until the result of the Shrewsbury and Congleton Judicial Review was known. The judgement in this case has now been delivered. The judicial review was unsuccessful. The High Court Judge held that the Secretary of State had common law powers available to her to carry out the process, that she did not have to be satisfied that a proposal met the criteria at the time of the assessment and that she had not acted irrationally. Key Issues • Advice has been taken from our Counsel (who also acts for Shrewsbury and Congleton) on whether we should now continue with our case in the light of the Shrewsbury judgement. We have been advised that unless the Shrewsbury judgement is appealed successfully we cannot effectively progress our case. The grounds of our case are similar and the arguments we would raise are much the same as Shrewsbury raised. We have been advised that we should focus on supporting an appeal by Shrewsbury and Congleton.
7206 Thf London Gazette, 11 September, 19J 4

7206 THF LONDON GAZETTE, 11 SEPTEMBER, 19J 4. SECOND SCHEDULE. ESSEX. Municipal Boroughs.—Chelmsford: Colches- PROHIBITED AREAS. ter : Harwich: Maldon: Southend-on-Sea. Urban Districts.—Brentwood: Brightlingeea:. The following areas are prohibited areas in Burnham-on-Crouch: Clacton: Frinton-on- England: — Sea: Grays Thurrock: Leigh-on-Sea: Shoe- CHESHIRE. bury ness : Tilbury: Walton-on-the-Naze. County Boroughs.—Birkenhead: Chester: Witham: Wivenhoe. Wallasey. Rural Districts.—Billericay: Braintree—(Civ: Urban Districts.—Bromborough : Ellesmere Parishes of—Feering, Great Coggeshall Port and Whitby: Higher Bebington: Kelvedon, Little C'oggeshall, MarkshalU Hoole: Hoylake and West Kirby: Lower Rivenhall, Fairsted, Faulkbourne, Hatfield. Bebington: Neston and Parkgate: Runcorn. Peverel, and Terling only) : Chelmsford: Rural Districts.—Chester (Civil Parishes of— Lexden: Maldon : Orsett: Rochf ord: Tend." Bache, Backford, Blacom-cum-Crabwall, ring. Bridge Trafford, Capenhurst, Caughall, GLOUCESTERSHIRE . Chorlton by Backford, Croughton, Dunham- County Borough.—Bristol. on-the-Hill, Elton, Great Saughall, Haps- Urban Districts.—C'oleford : Kingswood. ford, Hoole Village, Ince, Lea by Backford, Rural Districts.—Chipping Sodbury: Lyd- Little Saughall, Little Stanney, Mickle bury: Thornbury: Warmley: West Dean. Trafford, Mollington, Moston, Newton-by- Chester, Picto^i, Shotwick, Shotwick Park, HAMPSHIRE. Stoke, Thornton-le-Moors, Upton-by- County Boroughs.—Bournemouth: Ports- Chester, Wervin, Wimbolds Trafford, and mouth : Southampton. Woodbank only): Runcorn (Civil Parishes Municipal Boroughs.—Christchurch : Lyming- of—Acton Grange, Antrobus, Appleton, ton: Romsey. Bartington, Crowley, Daresbury, Dutton, Urban Districts.—Eastleigh and Bishopstoke . Grappenhall, Great Budworth, Hatton, Fareham: Gosport and Alverstoke. Higher Whitley, Keckwick, Latchford Havant: Itchen: Warblington. Without, Lower Whitley, Moore, Newton- Rural Districts.—Christchurch : Fareham by-Daresbury, Preston-on-the-Hill, Seven Havant: Ljonington: New Forest: Romsey.
Cheshire East Local Plan

Cheshire East Local Plan Local Development Scheme 2014-2016 April 2014 1 Introduction 2 2 The Proposed Cheshire East Local Plan 2 3 Resources and Project Management 4 4 Sustainability Appraisal and Habitats Regulation Assessment 6 5 Evidence Base 6 6 Monitoring and Review 7 Appendices 1 Schedule of Development Plan Documents 8 2 Evidence Base 13 3 Risk Assessment 16 4 Glossary of Terms 19 5 List of 'Saved' Policies 21 Congleton Borough Local Plan Saved Policies 21 Borough of Crewe and Nantwich Local Plan Saved Policies 25 Macclesfield Borough Local Plan Saved Policies 28 Cheshire Replacement Minerals Local Plan Saved Policies 36 Cheshire Replacement Waste Local Plan Saved Policies 38 Contents CHESHIRE EAST LOCAL PLAN Local Development Scheme 2014 - 2016 1 1 Introduction 1.1 The first Cheshire East Local Development Scheme was approved in February 2009 and has been revised when appropriate. This is the fourth Local Development Scheme, which sets out a programme and timetable for the preparation of documents for the Cheshire East Local Plan during the period 2014 to 2016. 1.2 The Local Development Scheme is the starting point for people to find out about the Council’s timetable for preparing the various documents of the Local Plan, the status of each document and the policies contained in it. The Local Development Scheme describes: the content and geographic area to which each of the Development Plan Documents relates; the timetable and the key milestones in their preparation; the interrelationships between each document; and the arrangements during the transitional period for saved policies. 1.3 Progress with the preparation of the Local Plan documents will be reviewed as part of the Local Plan Monitoring Report.
Area Name Course Fixture Date D&C Bishops Court Club Ottery St Mary

Area Name Course Fixture Date D&C Bishops Court Club Ottery St Mary (Bishops Court) 19/11/2017 Subject to Conditions SAND Point-to-Point Owners & Riders Association Barbury Racecourse 26/11/2017 EA Cambridge University United Hunts Club Cottenham 03/12/2017 W Hursley Hambledon Larkhill 03/12/2017 D&C Cornwall Hunt Club Wadebridge 10/12/2017 N Ratcheugh Racing Club Alnwick 10/12/2017 WM Harkaway Club Chaddesley Corbett 29/12/2017 EA Cambridgeshire Harriers Hunt Club Cottenham 31/12/2017 W Larkhill Racing Club Larkhill 07/01/2018 N West Percy Alnwick 07/01/2018 D&C North Cornwall Wadebridge 07/01/2018 Y Yorkshire Area Point-to-Point Club Sheriff Hutton 14/01/2018 EA Dunston Harriers Ampton 14/01/2018 SM Barbury International Racing Club Barbury Racecourse 20/01/2018 N Jedforest Friars Haugh 21/01/2018 W Royal Artillery Larkhill 27/01/2018 SM Heythrop Cocklebarrow 28/01/2018 D&C Tiverton Foxhounds Chipley Park 28/01/2018 EA North Norfolk Harriers Higham 28/01/2018 MID Midlands Area Club Thorpe Lodge 28/01/2018 N Percy Alnwick 04/02/2018 W South Dorset Milborne St Andrew 04/02/2018 EA Cambridgeshire with Enfield Chace Horseheath 04/02/2018 D&C Western Wadebridge 04/02/2018 N Berwickshire Friars Haugh 10/02/2018 EA Cambridge University Draghounds Cottenham 10/02/2018 WM Albrighton & Woodland (North) Chaddesley Corbett 11/02/2018 SAND Vine & Craven Barbury Racecourse 11/02/2018 Y Sinnington Duncombe Park 11/02/2018 MID Brocklesby Brocklesby Park 17/02/2018 W Combined Services Larkhill 18/02/2018 D&C South Pool Harriers Buckfastleigh 18/02/2018 SE South East Hunt Club Charing 18/02/2018 SWM Curre & Llangibby Howick 18/02/2018 NW Sir W.W.
Local Government Review in the Derwentside District Council Area, County Durham

Local Government Review in the Derwentside District Council Area, County Durham Research Study Conducted for The Boundary Committee for England April 2004 Contents Introduction 3 Summary of Key Findings 5 Methodology 7 Definitions of Social Grade and Area 11 Topline Findings (Marked-up Questionnaire) 13 Introduction This summary report presents the key findings of research conducted by the MORI Social Research Institute on behalf of The Boundary Committee for England in the Derwentside District Council area, County Durham. The aim of the research was to establish residents’ views about alternative patterns of unitary local government. Background to the Research In May 2003, the Government announced that a referendum would take place in autumn 2004 in the North East, North West and Yorkshire and the Humber regions on whether there should be elected regional assemblies. The Government indicated that, where a regional assembly is set up, the current two-tier structure of local government - district, borough or city councils (called in this report ‘districts’) and county councils - should be replaced by a single tier of ‘unitary’ local authorities. In June 2003, the Government directed The Boundary Committee for England (‘the Committee’) to undertake an independent review of local government in two-tier areas in the three regions, with a view to recommending possible unitary structures to be put before affected local people in a referendum at a later date. MORI was commissioned by COI Communications, on behalf of the Committee, to help it gauge local opinion. The research was in two stages. First, in summer 2003, MORI researched local residents’ views about local government and how they identify with their local community.
Provisional Programme National Para-Swimming Championships 2017

Provisional Programme National Para-Swimming Championships 2017 Session 1 EVENT 101 Mens MC 100m Freestyle - S1 to S14 1. Gabriel Mills (04) Orion S7 2:52.43 64. Matthew Clowes (99) Caradon S8 1:12.94 2. Ben Shewbridge (06) West Dorset S4 2:26.85 65. Ryan Potter (03) Blackpool Aq S14 1:12.28 3. Austin Pritchard (06) Devonport S6 2:25.25 66. Peter Harper (98) Marlborough S14 1:11.97 4. Harvey Phillips (04) Louth S4 2:23.98 67. Reilly Shanahan (00) Shrewsbury S9 1:11.33 5. Asa Bebbington (02) Co Manch Aq S6 2:04.85 68. Isaac Dunning (97) Inverclyde S9 1:11.03 6. Bruce Dee (06) Northampton S6 2:02.96 69. Scott Hadley (98) Orion S8 1:10.87 7. Connor Stuart (03) Co Cambridge S6 2:02.93 70. Owen Say (01) Bracknell S8 1:10.67 8. James Garry (02) Mildenhall S9 2:02.42 71. Jamie S-Swords (02) West Dorset S14 1:09.17 9. Marcus Harvey (05) Littleh'pton S14 1:56.48 72. Owen Garsides (01) KingstonHull S14 1:09.08 10. Neil Ferguson (02) Musselburgh S7 1:52.40 73. Dylan Bleakley (03) East Lothian S14 1:08.97 11. Nathan Dallaston (03) Harrogate S8 1:51.49 74. Kyle Hughes (01) Motherwell W S9 1:07.99 12. Nima Ghavami (01) Northampton S7 1:47.43 75. Kieran Williams (04) Newquay S10 1:07.56 13. Aiden Watkins (03) Co Manch Aq S6 1:47.03 76. Finlay Middleton (02) Mt Kelly S8 1:07.34 14.
Derwentside College

REPORT FROM THE INSPECTORATE Derwentside College August 1997 THE FURTHER EDUCATION FUNDING COUNCIL THE FURTHER EDUCATION FUNDING COUNCIL The Further Education Funding Council has a legal duty to make sure further education in England is properly assessed. The FEFC’s inspectorate inspects and reports on each college of further education every four years. The inspectorate also assesses and reports nationally on the curriculum and gives advice to the FEFC’s quality assessment committee. College inspections are carried out in accordance with the framework and guidelines described in Council Circular 93/28. They involve full-time inspectors and registered part-time inspectors who have knowledge and experience in the work they inspect. Inspection teams normally include at least one member who does not work in education and a member of staff from the college being inspected. Cheylesmore House Quinton Road Coventry CV1 2WT Telephone 01203 863000 Fax 01203 863100 © FEFC 1997 You may photocopy this report. CONTENTS Paragraph Summary Introduction 1 The college and its aims 2 Responsiveness and range of provision 10 Governance and management 19 Students’ recruitment, guidance and support 30 Teaching and the promotion of learning 40 Students’ achievements 50 Quality assurance 61 Resources 70 Conclusions and issues 80 Figures GRADE DESCRIPTORS The procedures for assessing quality are set out in the Council Circular 93/28. During their inspection, inspectors assess the strengths and weaknesses of each aspect of provision they inspect. Their assessments are set out in the reports. They also use a five-point grading scale to summarise the balance between strengths and weaknesses. The descriptors for the grades are: • grade 1 – provision which has many strengths and very few weaknesses • grade 2 – provision in which the strengths clearly outweigh the weaknesses • grade 3 – provision with a balance of strengths and weaknesses • grade 4 – provision in which the weaknesses clearly outweigh the strengths • grade 5 – provision which has many weaknesses and very few strengths.
2004 No. 3211 LOCAL GOVERNMENT, ENGLAND The

STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2004 No. 3211 LOCAL GOVERNMENT, ENGLAND The Local Authorities (Categorisation) (England) (No. 2) Order 2004 Made - - - - 6th December 2004 Laid before Parliament 10th December 2004 Coming into force - - 31st December 2004 The First Secretary of State, having received a report from the Audit Commission(a) produced under section 99(1) of the Local Government Act 2003(b), in exercise of the powers conferred upon him by section 99(4) of that Act, hereby makes the following Order: Citation, commencement and application 1.—(1) This Order may be cited as the Local Authorities (Categorisation) (England) (No.2) Order 2004 and shall come into force on 31st December 2004. (2) This Order applies in relation to English local authorities(c). Categorisation report 2. The English local authorities, to which the report of the Audit Commission dated 8th November 2004 relates, are, by this Order, categorised in accordance with their categorisation in that report. Excellent authorities 3. The local authorities listed in Schedule 1 to this Order are categorised as excellent. Good authorities 4. The local authorities listed in Schedule 2 to this Order are categorised as good. Fair authorities 5. The local authorities listed in Schedule 3 to this Order are categorised as fair. (a) For the definition of “the Audit Commission”, see section 99(7) of the Local Government Act 2003. (b) 2003 c.26. The report of the Audit Commission consists of a letter from the Chief Executive of the Audit Commission to the Minister for Local and Regional Government dated 8th November 2004 with the attached list of local authorities categorised by the Audit Commission as of that date.