Indian Army Officers
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The London Gazette, February 12, 1884. 747
THE LONDON GAZETTE, FEBRUARY 12, 1884. 747 BREVET. and Indian Military Forces made by the Govern- Major Alexander Reginald Seton, Royal (late ments in India:— Bombay) Engineers, to be Lieutenant-Colonel under the provisions of Article 11 (ff.) of the BENGAL STAFF CORPS. Royal Warrant of llth March, 1882. Dated To be Lieutenant- Colonels. 23rd January, 1884. Major Theodore William Hogg. Dated 4th De- cember, 1883. MEMORANDA. Major Charles Allan Bay lay. Dated llth De- Lieutenant-Colonel and Colonel Henry John cember,, 1883. Maclean, half-pay, has been placed on retired .pay, Major William Henry Wilkins. Dated 12th with the honorary rank of Major-General. Dated December, 1883. 1st February, 1884. Major Robert Henry Palmer. Dated 12th De- Lieutenant-Colonel Charles Edmund "Webber, cember, 1883. C.B., Royal Engineers, to be Colonel. Dated Major John Finnis. Dated 12th December, 1883. 24th January, 1884. Major Charles Edward Macaulay. Dated 12th Major and Brevet Lieutenant-Colon el Sir Oliver December, 1883. Beauchamp Coventry St. John, K.C.S.I., Royal Major Arthur L* Estrange Hamilton Holmes. (late Bengal) Engineers, to be Colonel. Dated Dated loth December, 1883. 4th February, 1884. Major Horace Ralph Spearman. Dated 18th Lieutenant - Colonel J. Cecil Russell, 12th December, 1883. Lancers, to be Colonel. Dated 7th February Major James Duncan Macpherson. Dated 19th 1884. December, 1883. Honorary Colonel Thomas G. O'D. Hervey, Major William Heathcote Unwin. Dated 20th Major, retired pay, retires from the Service, re- December, 1883. ceiving the value of his Commission. Dated 13th February, 1884. To be Captain. Major Herbert Everitt, retired, Royal Marine Lieutenant William John Butterworth Bird. -
Part Iv the Indian Naval Auxilary
PART IV THE INDIAN NAVAL AUXILARY SERVICE REGULATIONS, 1973 AMENDMENTS TO THE REGULATIONS FOR THE NAVY, 1965 (INBR 2) NAVAL HEADQUARTERS New Delhi, the 1st October, 1977 (Batch No. 26) The following amendment is made to the Regulations for the Navy, 1965: - Amendment No. 82 Insert New Part IV of the Regulations for the Navy as “INDIAN NAVAL AUXILIARY SERVICE REGULATIONS, 1973.” (SRO 232 dated 7 Aug 73) (File No. RR/0190/67) Amendment No. 191 Amended vide SRO No. 191 dated 28 August, 1995 Published in the Gazette if India, Part II Section 4, dated 09 September, 1995) (SRO 191 dated 28 Aug 95) ( File No. NL/4621) PART IV (STATUTORY) CONTENTS Subjects Page I PRELIMINARY II Officers – Branches, Commissions, Examinations, Probation, Promotion, Secondment and Retirement III Sailors-Recruitment, Promotion, Transfer, Discharges and Retirements IV Appointment and Duties - Section I- Permanent Staff Section II-Duties V Uniform, Victualling and Mess Traps VI Conditions of Service- Section I-Mobilizations and Transfers Section II-Rights/Privileges Section III- Discipline, Offences and Punishments VII Training and related matters- Section I-Training Section II-Accommodation Section III-Employment of Civilian Instructor Officers VIII Financial Regulations- Section I-Pay and Allowances Section II-Disability Pension/Gratuity Section III-Pension entitlements and allowances (ii) LIST OF SCHEDULES Page I Form INXS-1 (Application for enrolement) II Form of Oath/Affirmation III Terms and conditions of service of officers on the Permanent Staff IV Terms and conditions of service of Master Chief Petty Officers, and other sailors on the permanent staff V List of Uniform Items required to be maintained By Officers VI Basic scale of clothing for sailors VII Periods of wear of articles of clothing VIII Additional items of clothing and necessaries- IX Forms X Scale of accommodation for Indian Naval Auxiliary Service Units XI Scale of teenage for camps XII Agreement for extension of service (iii) PART IV (STATUTORY) RECORD OF AMENDMENTS Sl No. -
The Gurkhas', 1857-2009
"Bravest of the Brave": The making and re-making of 'the Gurkhas', 1857-2009 Gavin Rand University of Greenwich Thanks: Matthew, audience… Many of you, I am sure, will be familiar with the image of the ‘martial Gurkha’. The image dates from nineteenth century India, and though the suggestion that the Nepalese are inherently martial appears dubious, images of ‘warlike Gurkhas’ continue to circulate in contemporary discourse. Only last week, Dipprasad Pun, of the Royal Gurkha Rifles, was awarded the Conspicuous Gallantry Cross for single-handedly fighting off up to 30 Taliban insurgents. In 2010, reports surfaced that an (unnamed) Gurkha had been reprimanded for using his ‘traditional’ kukri knife to behead a Taliban insurgent, an act which prompted the Daily Mail to exclaim ‘Thank god they’re on our side!) Thus, the bravery and the brutality of the Gurkhas – two staple elements of nineteenth century representations – continue to be replayed. Such images have also been mobilised in other contexts. On 4 November 2008, Chief Superintendent Kevin Hurley, of the Metropolitan Police, told the Commons’ Home Affairs Select Committee, that Gurkhas would make excellent ‘recruits’ to the capital’s police service. Describing the British Army’s Nepalese veterans as loyal, disciplined, hardworking and brave, Hurley reported that the Met’s senior commanders believed that ex-Gurkhas could provide a valuable resource to London’s police. Many Gurkhas, it was noted, were multilingual (in subcontinental languages, useful for policing the capital’s diverse population), fearless (and therefore unlikely to be intimidated by the apparently rising tide of knife and gun crime) and, Hurley noted, the recruiting of these ‘loyal’, ‘brave’ and ‘disciplined’ Nepalese would also provide an excellent (and, one is tempted to add, convenient) means of diversifying the workforce. -
“Othering” Oneself: European Civilian Casualties and Representations of Gendered, Religious, and Racial Ideology During the Indian Rebellion of 1857
“OTHERING” ONESELF: EUROPEAN CIVILIAN CASUALTIES AND REPRESENTATIONS OF GENDERED, RELIGIOUS, AND RACIAL IDEOLOGY DURING THE INDIAN REBELLION OF 1857 A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences Florida Gulf Coast University In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirement for the Degree of Masters of Arts in History By Stefanie A. Babb 2014 APPROVAL SHEET This thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Arts in History ________________________________________ Stefanie A. Babb Approved: April 2014 _________________________________________ Eric A. Strahorn, Ph.D. Committee Chair / Advisor __________________________________________ Frances Davey, Ph.D __________________________________________ Habtamu Tegegne, Ph.D. The final copy of this thesis has been examined by the signatories and we find that both the content and the form meet acceptable presentation standards of scholarly work in the above mentioned discipline. Copyright © 2014 by Stefanie Babb All rights reserved One must claim the right and the duty of imagining the future, instead of accepting it. —Eduardo Galeano iv CONTENTS PREFACE v ACKNOWLEDGMENTS vi INTRODUCTION 1 CHAPTER ONE HISTORIOGRAPHY 12 CHAPTER TWO LET THE “OTHERING” BEGIN 35 Modes of Isolation 39 Colonial Thought 40 Racialization 45 Social Reforms 51 Political Policies 61 Conclusion 65 CHAPTER THREE LINES DRAWN 70 Outbreak at Meerut and the Siege on Delhi 70 The Cawnpore Massacres 78 Changeable Realities 93 Conclusion 100 CONCLUSION 102 APPENDIX A MAPS 108 APPENDIX B TIMELINE OF INDIAN REBELLION 112 BIBLIOGRAPHY 114 v Preface This thesis began as a seminar paper that was written in conjunction with the International Civilians in Warfare Conference hosted by Florida Gulf Coast University, February, 2012. -
The Education of a Field Marshal :: Wellington in India and Iberia
University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014 1992 The education of a field am rshal :: Wellington in India and Iberia/ David G. Cotter University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/theses Cotter, David G., "The ducae tion of a field marshal :: Wellington in India and Iberia/" (1992). Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014. 1417. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.umass.edu/theses/1417 This thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014 by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE EDUCATION OF A FIELD MARSHAL WELLINGTON IN INDIA AND IBERIA A Thesis Presented by DAVID' G. COTTER Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS May, 1992 Department of History Copyright by David G. Cotter 1992 All Rights Reserved ' THE EDUCATION OF A FIELD MARSHAL WELLINGTON IN INDIA AND IBERIA A Thesis Presented by DAVID G. COTTER Approved as to style and content by Franklin B. Wickwire, Chair )1 Mary B/ Wickwire 'Mary /5. Wilson Robert E. Jones^ Department Chai^r, History ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am grateful to all in the History department at the University of Massachusetts, especially Professors Stephen Pelz, Marvin Swartz, R. Dean Ware, Mary Wickwire and Mary Wilson. I am particularly indebted to Professor Franklin Wickwire. He performed as instructor, editor, devil's advocate, mentor and friend. -
US Military Ranks and Units
US Military Ranks and Units Modern US Military Ranks The table shows current ranks in the US military service branches, but they can serve as a fair guide throughout the twentieth century. Ranks in foreign military services may vary significantly, even when the same names are used. Many European countries use the rank Field Marshal, for example, which is not used in the United States. Pay Army Air Force Marines Navy and Coast Guard Scale Commissioned Officers General of the ** General of the Air Force Fleet Admiral Army Chief of Naval Operations Army Chief of Commandant of the Air Force Chief of Staff Staff Marine Corps O-10 Commandant of the Coast General Guard General General Admiral O-9 Lieutenant General Lieutenant General Lieutenant General Vice Admiral Rear Admiral O-8 Major General Major General Major General (Upper Half) Rear Admiral O-7 Brigadier General Brigadier General Brigadier General (Commodore) O-6 Colonel Colonel Colonel Captain O-5 Lieutenant Colonel Lieutenant Colonel Lieutenant Colonel Commander O-4 Major Major Major Lieutenant Commander O-3 Captain Captain Captain Lieutenant O-2 1st Lieutenant 1st Lieutenant 1st Lieutenant Lieutenant, Junior Grade O-1 2nd Lieutenant 2nd Lieutenant 2nd Lieutenant Ensign Warrant Officers Master Warrant W-5 Chief Warrant Officer 5 Master Warrant Officer Officer 5 W-4 Warrant Officer 4 Chief Warrant Officer 4 Warrant Officer 4 W-3 Warrant Officer 3 Chief Warrant Officer 3 Warrant Officer 3 W-2 Warrant Officer 2 Chief Warrant Officer 2 Warrant Officer 2 W-1 Warrant Officer 1 Warrant Officer Warrant Officer 1 Blank indicates there is no rank at that pay grade. -
G.H.Q. India Adjutant-General's Branch
2020 www.BritishMilitaryHistory.co.uk Author: Robert PALMER, M.A. A CONCISE HISTORY OF: ADJUTANT-GENERAL’S BRANCH G.H.Q. INDIA (HISTORY & PERSONNEL) A short history of General Headquarters India Command between 1938 and 1947, and details of the key appointments held in G.H.Q. India during that period. Copyright ©www.BritishMilitaryHistory.co.uk (2020)] 24 April 2020 [G.H.Q. INDIA HISTORY & PERSONNEL] A Concise Biography of Lieutenant General Sir William H. G. BAKER Version: 1_1 This edition dated: 28 April 2020 ISBN: Not yet allocated. All rights reserved. No part of the publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means including; electronic, electrostatic, magnetic tape, mechanical, photocopying, scanning without prior permission in writing from the publishers. Author: Robert PALMER, M.A. (copyright held by author) Assisted by: Stephen HEAL Published privately by: The Author – Publishing as: www.BritishMilitaryHistory.co.uk ©www.BritishMilitaryH istory.co.uk Page 1 24 April 2020 [G.H.Q. INDIA HISTORY & PERSONNEL] Headquarters Staff of the Army in India Headquarters of the Army in India was a pre-war command covering the entire country of British India. The headquarters consisted of four branches: • General Staff Branch, • Adjutant General’s Branch, • Quarter-Master-General’s Branch, • Master-General of the Ordnance Branch, • Engineer-in-Chief’s Branch. The Commander-in-Chief was a General in the Indian Army. This was usually a four-year posting. The C-in-C had a staff of five, an Assistant Military Secretary (Personal) (Lieutenant Colonel), three Aides- de-Camp (one Major and three Captains) and a personal surgeon (Major). -
Military Rank Equivalency
Military rank equivalency Although GS civilians do not have military rank by virtue of their GS position, regulations include civilian and military grade equivalencies for pay and protocol comparison purposes. Military rank or civilian grade often have no bearing on supervisory precedence—generally, precedence and authority are guided by situational expertise. For example, a GS-9 is considered comparable to a first lieutenant or lieutenant (junior grade) (O-2), while a GS-15 (top of the General Schedule) is the equivalent grade of a colonel or captain (O-6). Senior Executive Service (SES) and Senior Level grades correspond for protocol purposes to flag and general officers (admirals and generals). Grade equivalencies were created by the U.S. Department of Defense for the purpose of treating civilians serving alongside the Armed Forces who have been captured as prisoners of war according to the Geneva Convention.[6] Geneva Convention Category GS MILITARY Senior Executive V: General Officer O-7 through O-10 Service GS-15 O-6 IV: Field Grade Officer GS-14/GS-13 O-5 GS-12 O-4 O-3 GS-11/GS-10 O-2 and W-4/W- III: Company Grade Officer GS-9/GS-8 3 GS-7 O-1 and W-2/W- 1 II: Non-commissioned Officer/Staff Non-Comissioned GS-6 E-7 through E-9 Officer GS-5 E-6/E-5 GS-4 E-4 I: Enlisted GS-1 through GS-3 E-1 through E-3 Grade equivalencies have also been issued by the U.S. Department of State for other purposes, such as assignment of permanent and transient housing to eligible civilian employees. -
Equivalent Ranks of the British Services and U.S. Air Force
EQUIVALENT RANKS OF THE BRITISH SERVICES AND U.S. AIR FORCE RoyalT Air RoyalT NavyT ArmyT T UST Air ForceT ForceT Commissioned Ranks Marshal of the Admiral of the Fleet Field Marshal Royal Air Force Command General of the Air Force Admiral Air Chief Marshal General General Vice Admiral Air Marshal Lieutenant General Lieutenant General Rear Admiral Air Vice Marshal Major General Major General Commodore Brigadier Air Commodore Brigadier General Colonel Captain Colonel Group Captain Commander Lieutenant Colonel Wing Commander Lieutenant Colonel Lieutenant Squadron Leader Commander Major Major Lieutenant Captain Flight Lieutenant Captain EQUIVALENT RANKS OF THE BRITISH SERVICES AND U.S. AIR FORCE RoyalT Air RoyalT NavyT ArmyT T UST Air ForceT ForceT First Lieutenant Sub Lieutenant Lieutenant Flying Officer Second Lieutenant Midshipman Second Lieutenant Pilot Officer Notes: 1. Five-Star Ranks have been phased out in the British Services. The Five-Star ranks in the U.S. Services are reserved for wartime only. 2. The rank of Midshipman in the Royal Navy is junior to the equivalent Army and RAF ranks. EQUIVALENT RANKS OF THE BRITISH SERVICES AND U.S. AIR FORCE RoyalT Air RoyalT NavyT ArmyT T UST Air ForceT ForceT Non-commissioned Ranks Warrant Officer Warrant Officer Warrant Officer Class 1 (RSM) Chief Master Sergeant of the Air Force Warrant Officer Class 2b (RQSM) Chief Command Master Sergeant Warrant Officer Class 2a Chief Master Sergeant Chief Petty Officer Staff Sergeant Flight Sergeant First Senior Master Sergeant Chief Technician Senior Master Sergeant Petty Officer Sergeant Sergeant First Master Sergeant EQUIVALENT RANKS OF THE BRITISH SERVICES AND U.S. -
Statistical Release UK Armed Forces Annual Personnel Report
UK Armed Forces Annual Personnel Report 1 April 2013 The UK Armed Forces Annual Personnel Report contains figures on strength, intake and outflow of UK Regular Forces. It complements the UK Armed Forces Quarterly and Monthly Personnel Reports by providing greater detail about the sex, ethnicity and rank of the Statistical release Armed Forces. It uses data from the Ministry of Defence Joint Personnel Administration System (JPA). Published: 23 May 2013 (Reissued 26 November 2013) The tables present information about the composition of the UK’s Armed Forces in the most recent financial year. Contents Page Contents page 2 Armed Forces Personnel Key Points and Trends Commentary 3 UK Regular Forces: Strength At 1 April 2013: Table 1 UK Regular Forces Rank 6 There were 170,710 UK Regular Forces personnel, Structure of which 29,060 were officers and 141,650 were Table 1a UK Regular Forces Rank other ranks. Structure by Sex and 7 Ethnicity The percentage of women in the UK Regular Forces Table 2 UK Regular Forces Strength was 9.7% in April 2013. 8 by Service and Age Black and Minority Ethnic (BME) personnel Table 3 UK Regular Officers 9 comprised 7.1% of the UK Regular Forces, Strength by Age and Sex continuing a long term gradual increase in the Table 4 UK Regular Other Ranks 9 Strength by Age and sex proportion of BME personnel. Graph 6 Strength by UK Regular 10 56% of Army personnel were aged under 30, Forces by Age and Rank compared with 48% of the Naval Service and 40% UK Regular Forces: Intake and of the RAF. -
Impact of the Sepoy Mutiny on Indian Polity and Society
Impact of the Sepoy Mutiny on Indian Polity and Society claws.in/1420/impact-of-the-sepoy-mutiny-in-indian-polity-and-society-isha-naravane.html #1420 184 August 14, 2015 By Isha Naravane Introduction The events of 1857 loom large in Indian History. Some consider it the first great war of independence, others a mere mutiny and some say it was a revolt against existing conditions. Whatever be the case, the most singular consequence for India’s army was how the British now viewed their armed forces in India. Whether the British ruled it as a trading company or as a nation, the use of force and military might was still necessary to occupy and subjugate the subcontinent. The Revolt of 1857 led to a re-organization of the Indian army and this article highlights some of the socio-economic and cultural impacts of this re-organization. The soldier is also a product of his socio-economic, cultural and political landscape. The recruitment of natives for the British Indian army on a large scale, their training in modern warfare methods, the salary and rewards given to native soldiers all had an impact on the environment where the soldiers came from, on Indian rulers who fielded armies on the battlefield, and on agrarian communities who ultimately shouldered the revenue burden for maintenance of armies. Salient Features Impacting Post-Mutiny Re-Organisation The events of the 1857 uprising all over India are well-documented. This article will discuss those which are pertinent to large scale re-organisation of political and military systems. -
Alison Safadi
alison safadi From Sepoy to Subadar / Khvab-o-Khayal and Douglas Craven Phillott Introduction During the 1970s John Borthwick Gilchrist, convinced of the potential value of the language he called ìHindustani,î1 campaigned hard to raise its status to that of the ìclassicalî languages (Arabic, Persian and Sanskrit) which, until then, had been perceived by the British to be more important than the Indian ìvernaculars.î By 1796 he had already made a valuable contribution to its study with the publication of his dictionary and gram- mar. It was the opening of Fort William College in 1800 by Wellesley, however, that signaled the beginning of the colonial stateís official interest in the language. Understandably, given his pioneering work, a substantial amount has been written on Gilchrist. Much less attention has been paid to the long line of British scholars, missionaries, and military officers who published Hindustani grammars and textbooks over the next 150 years. Although such books continued to be published until 1947, British scholarly interest in Hindustani seemed to have waned by the beginning of World War I. While Gilchrist and earlier authors had aspired to producing literary works, later textbooks were generally written for a much more mundane 1Defining the term ìHindustaniî satisfactorily is problematic but this is not the place to rehearse or debate the often contentious arguments surrounding Urdu/ Hindi/Hindustani. Definitions used by the British grammar and textbook writers of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries are inconsistent and often contradictory. For the purposes of this paper, therefore, I am using the term in its widest possible sense: to cover the language at all levels, from the literary (Persianized) Bāgh-o- Bahar and (Persian-free) Prem Sagur to the basic ìlanguage of commandî of the twentieth-century military grammars.