Listening to Babbitt: Perception and Analysis Of

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Listening to Babbitt: Perception and Analysis Of LISTENING TO BABBITT: PERCEPTION AND ANALYSIS OF MILTON BABBITT’S DU FOR SOPRANO AND PIANO by ERIN L. SULLIVAN (Under the Direction of Adrian Childs and Susan Thomas) ABSTRACT This paper explores the ways in which scholars can approach and meaningfully discuss the music of Milton Babbitt. Critics argue that the standard discourse constructs a binary division between how Babbitt’s music works and how it sounds—that is, the system-based analytical approach engenders an attitude that the only elements of Babbitt’s music warranting serious consideration are theoretical conceptions, not aural perceptions. An examination of Babbitt’s writings will reveal the motivations for, and importance of, this system-based discourse in the analysis of “contextual” musical languages. However, this rhetoric has its limitations as well, thus the second part of this paper offers an alternative, listening-based approach to Babbitt’s music by exploring the vivid interplay of compositional structures, poetic text, and perceived meaning of musical gestures in Babbitt’s song cycle, Du (1951). This paper concludes by suggesting possible means of reconciling aural perceptions and compositional structures within a larger framework of serial poetics. INDEX WORDS: Milton Babbitt, Serialism, Music Theory, Music Analysis, Music Discourse, Du, Song Cycle, American Music LISTENING TO BABBITT: PERCEPTION AND ANALYSIS OF MILTON BABBITT’S DU FOR SOPRANO AND PIANO by ERIN L. SULLIVAN B.S., Mary Washington College, 2003 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF ARTS ATHENS, GEORGIA 2005 © 2005 Erin L. Sullivan All Rights Reserved LISTENING TO BABBITT: PERCEPTION AND ANALYSIS OF MILTON BABBITT’S DU FOR SOPRANO AND PIANO by ERIN L. SULLIVAN Major Professors: Adrian Childs Susan Thomas Committee: David Schiller John Turci-Escobar Electronic Version Approved: Maureen Grasso Dean of the Graduate School The University of Georgia August 2005 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish to convey my sincere gratitude to my major advisors and committee for their unflagging encouragement and guidance throughout the thesis-writing process. Susan Thomas was the first person to convince me that I had a topic worth pursuing, and her direction over the past year and a half has significantly broadened my thinking on musical discourse and contemporary musical scholarship. Adrian Childs has been an impeccable editor, and his insightful comments have shaped this current project and inspired me to pursue future research. Patiently serving as my sounding board for new ideas, John Turci-Escobar has provided me with more books to read and thoughts to ponder than can possibly be addressed in this paper. His contributions have been invaluable. Finally, since my first semester at The University of Georgia, David Schiller has played an active role in helping me formulate arguments for this thesis, and also contributed much to the poetic analysis in Chapter Two. In addition, this project has benefited greatly from conversations over the past year with Joseph Dubiel, Marion Guck, and Christopher Hasty, among others. Their genuine interest in my work and constructive suggestions are most appreciated. Lastly, I wish to thank my friends and professors at The University of Georgia and The University of Mary Washington for their ongoing support. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .......................................................................................................iv LIST OF EXAMPLES..............................................................................................................vii LIST OF FIGURES .................................................................................................................viii INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................1 CHAPTER ONE: The Musical Discourse of/on Milton Babbitt ..................................................6 I. Theory and Analysis........................................................................................................7 II. Music Criticism.............................................................................................................19 III. Words about Music .......................................................................................................26 IV. Analytical Alternatives..................................................................................................33 CHAPTER TWO: Views of Du ................................................................................................41 I. Wiedersehen – See Again.............................................................................................. 47 II. Wankelmut – Fickleness................................................................................................51 III. Begegnung – Encounter.................................................................................................55 IV. Verzweifelt – Desperate ................................................................................................57 V. Allmacht – Omnipotence............................................................................................... 60 VI. Traum – Dream .............................................................................................................62 VII. Schwermut – Melancholy.............................................................................................. 64 v CHAPTER THREE: Perception and Analysis...........................................................................67 I. Comparing Analyses ..................................................................................................... 68 II. Future Research.............................................................................................................77 BIBLIOGRAPHY.....................................................................................................................80 vi LIST OF EXAMPLES Page Example 1: “Wiedersehen,” mm. 1-2 ........................................................................................48 Example 2: “Wiedersehen,” mm. 4-8 ........................................................................................49 Example 3: “Wankelmut,” mm. 20-24 ......................................................................................53 Example 4: “Wankelmut,” mm. 24-27 ......................................................................................54 Example 5: “Begegnung,” mm. 39-40.......................................................................................56 Example 6: “Begegnung,” mm. 44-46.......................................................................................57 Example 7: “Verzweifelt,” mm. 53-56 ......................................................................................59 Example 8: “Allmacht,” mm. 75-77 ..........................................................................................62 Example 9: “Traum,” mm. 78-80 ..............................................................................................63 Example 10: “Traum,” mm. 90-92 ............................................................................................64 Example 11: “Schwermut,” mm. 103-105 .................................................................................66 Example 12: “Schwermut,” mm. 99-100...................................................................................72 Example 13: “Verzweifelt,” mm. 49-53 ....................................................................................73 vii LIST OF FIGURES Page Figure 1: Trichordal Array, “Wiedersehen,” mm. 1-5................................................................69 Figure 2: Vertically Sounding Trichords, “Wiedersehen,” mm. 1-2...........................................69 Figure 3: Trichordal Array, “Wankelmut,” mm. 25-28..............................................................70 viii INTRODUCTION The standard discourse1 associated with the music of Milton Babbitt has received considerable attention from critics, arguably more attention than the music itself. The aspersions wielded at Babbitt and like-minded theorists—cries of “musical parsing,” “academicism,” and even “fanatical scientism”—suggest that this discourse, like his music, is widely perceived as being “for, of, and by specialists.”2 However, despite their distaste for these recondite analyses, many of the same critics consistently acknowledge the overall appeal—or at least the historical 1 As will become clearer over the course of this paper, the “standard discourse” I am examining forms a tenuous category; it has incorporated a plurality of discursive styles and approaches over the years. Yet the received view of traditional post-tonal theory and analysis, particularly as traced to its chief polemicist, Milton Babbitt, is consistently criticized. Thus my discussion of the “standard discourse” equates to an investigation of what this discourse has come to represent, for better or for worse. 2 The quote is extracted from Milton Babbitt’s infamous 1958 article, “The Composer as Specialist,” assigned the more inflammatory title “Who Cares if You Listen?” and reprinted in The Collected Essays of Milton Babbitt, ed. Stephen Peles with Stephen Dembski, Andrew Mead, and Joseph N. Straus (Princeton: Princeton UP, 2003), 48-54. (Hereafter all citations of Babbitt’s articles will refer to this collection.)
Recommended publications
  • Eric Dolphy Collection [Finding Aid]. Library of Congress
    Eric Dolphy Collection Guides to Special Collections in the Music Division of the Library of Congress Music Division, Library of Congress Washington, D.C. 2014 Contact information: http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.music/perform.contact Additional search options available at: http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.music/eadmus.mu014006 LC Online Catalog record: http://lccn.loc.gov/2014565637 Processed by the Music Division of the Library of Congress Collection Summary Title: Eric Dolphy Collection Span Dates: 1939-1964 Bulk Dates: (bulk 1960-1964) Call No.: ML31.D67 Creator: Dolphy, Eric Extent: Approximately 250 items ; 6 containers ; 5.0 linear feet Language: Collection material in English Location: Music Division, Library of Congress, Washington, D.C. Summary: Eric Dolphy was an American jazz alto saxophonist, flautist, and bass clarinetist. The collection consists of manuscript scores, sketches, parts, and lead sheets for works composed by Dolphy and others. Selected Search Terms The following terms have been used to index the description of this collection in the Library's online catalog. They are grouped by name of person or organization, by subject or location, and by occupation and listed alphabetically therein. People Dolphy, Eric--Manuscripts. Dolphy, Eric. Dolphy, Eric. Dolphy, Eric. Works. Selections. Mingus, Charles, 1922-1979. Works. Selections. Schuller, Gunther. Works. Selections. Subjects Composers--United States. Jazz musicians--United States. Jazz--Lead sheets. Jazz. Music--Manuscripts--United States. Saxophonists--United States. Form/Genre Scores. Administrative Information Provenance Gift, James Newton, 2014. Accruals No further accruals are expected. Processing History The Eric Dolphy Collection was processed by Thomas Barrick in 2014. Thomas Barrick coded the finding aid for EAD format in October 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliographie Stockhausen 1952-2013 Engl
    Stockhausen-Bibliography 1952-2013 [June 2013] The following bibliography alphabetically lists the authors who have written secondary literature about Karlheinz Stockhausen’s oeuvre: monographs, articles in books, periodicals and dictionaries, comprehensive works in which Stockhausen’s oeuvre is examined in detail. Reviews, contributions to concert programmes and publications in daily and weekly newspapers are only mentioned if they are considered to have reference value. Stockhausen’s own texts are not included, and conversations and interviews are only partly listed. Several works by the same author are listed consecutively in chronological order. When the name of the author was not available, the titel was listed alphabetically. This list includes the bibliographies that were published in Texte zur Musik, Vol. 6 (compiled by Chr. von Blumröder and H. Henck) and Vol. 10 (Chr. von Blumröder, R. Sengstock, D. Schwerdtfeger), and was supplemented and up-dated until 2013 (M. Luckas, I. Misch). Abkürzungen und Siglen / Abbreviations and Sigla AfMw. Archiv für Musikwissenschaft / Archive for Musicology Aufl. Auflage / printing Ausg. Ausgabe / edition Bd., Bde Band, Bände / volume, volumes Beitr. Beitrag / contribution BzAfMw. Beihefte zum Archiv für Musikwissenschaft / Supplementary booklets for the Archive for Musicology ders., dies. derselbe, dieselbe / the same DMT Dansk musiktidsskrift dt. deutsch / German eng. englisch / English erw. erweitert / supplemented Ffm. Frankfurt am Main / Frankfurt FP Feedback Papers frz. französisch / French H. Heft / booklet, issue Hbg Hamburg hg. herausgegeben / edited HmT Handwörterbuch der musikalischen Terminologie, hg. v. H. H. Eggebrecht, Wiesbaden 1972–1983, Stuttgart 1984–2006 / Hand Dictionary of Musical Terminology Ins. Institut / Institute jap. japanisch / Japanese Ldn London 1 ML Music and Letters MR The Music Review MT The Musical Times MuB Musik und Bildung Mw.
    [Show full text]
  • A Heretic in the Schoenberg Circle: Roberto Gerhard's First Engagement with Twelve-Tone Procedures in Andantino
    Twentieth-Century Music 16/3, 557–588 © Cambridge University Press 2019. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. doi: 10.1017/S1478572219000306 A Heretic in the Schoenberg Circle: Roberto Gerhard’s First Engagement with Twelve-Tone Procedures in Andantino DIEGO ALONSO TOMÁS Abstract Shortly before finishing his studies with Arnold Schoenberg, Roberto Gerhard composed Andantino,a short piece in which he used for the first time a compositional technique for the systematic circu- lation of all pitch classes in both the melodic and the harmonic dimensions of the music. He mod- elled this technique on the tri-tetrachordal procedure in Schoenberg’s Prelude from the Suite for Piano, Op. 25 but, unlike his teacher, Gerhard treated the tetrachords as internally unordered pitch-class collections. This decision was possibly encouraged by his exposure from the mid- 1920s onwards to Josef Matthias Hauer’s writings on ‘trope theory’. Although rarely discussed by scholars, Andantino occupies a special place in Gerhard’s creative output for being his first attempt at ‘twelve-tone composition’ and foreshadowing the permutation techniques that would become a distinctive feature of his later serial compositions. This article analyses Andantino within the context of the early history of twelve-tone music and theory. How well I do remember our Berlin days, what a couple we made, you and I; you (at that time) the anti-Schoenberguian [sic], or the very reluctant Schoenberguian, and I, the non-conformist, or the Schoenberguian malgré moi.
    [Show full text]
  • A Theory of Spatial Acquisition in Twelve-Tone Serial Music
    A Theory of Spatial Acquisition in Twelve-Tone Serial Music Ph.D. Dissertation submitted to the University of Cincinnati College-Conservatory of Music in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Ph.D. in Music Theory by Michael Kelly 1615 Elkton Pl. Cincinnati, OH 45224 [email protected] B.M. in Music Education, the University of Cincinnati College-Conservatory of Music B.M. in Composition, the University of Cincinnati College-Conservatory of Music M.M. in Music Theory, the University of Cincinnati College-Conservatory of Music Committee: Dr. Miguel Roig-Francoli, Dr. David Carson Berry, Dr. Steven Cahn Abstract This study introduces the concept of spatial acquisition and demonstrates its applicability to the analysis of twelve-tone music. This concept was inspired by Krzysztof Penderecki’s dis- tinctly spatial approach to twelve-tone composition in his Passion According to St. Luke. In the most basic terms, the theory of spatial acquisition is based on an understanding of the cycle of twelve pitch classes as contiguous units rather than discrete points. Utilizing this theory, one can track the gradual acquisition of pitch-class space by a twelve-tone row as each of its member pitch classes appears in succession, noting the patterns that the pitch classes exhibit in the pro- cess in terms of directionality, the creation and filling in of gaps, and the like. The first part of this study is an explanation of spatial acquisition theory, while the se- cond part comprises analyses covering portions of seven varied twelve-tone works. The result of these analyses is a deeper understanding of each twelve-tone row’s composition and how each row’s spatial characteristics are manifested on the musical surface.
    [Show full text]
  • Eric Chasalow/Over the Edge New World Records 80440 in Art, One
    Eric Chasalow/Over the Edge New World Records 80440 In art, one and one at times make three. In art for the ear, and particularly with acoustic in combination with electronically-created sounds, the listener tends to hear rather more than a lockstep summation of parts. And it's perhaps this phantom dimension that most intrigues the listener. Again perhaps, as in a difficult love affair, a resonance arises from the antipodal aspects of seeming incompatibility and obviously compelling attraction. One is therefore given to approach music so conceived as forever newly plowed ground. Odd, then, in terms of expectation, that the first electro-acoustic compositions incorporating magnetic tape appeared (as I write) just over forty years ago: New Grove cites Bruno Maderna's aptly titled Musica su due dimensione I, for flute and tape, and Edgard Varese's Deserts of 1950-54, for orchestra and tape, as among the earliest examples. Earlier still, in 1939, before the advent of magnetic tape, John Cage composed his Imaginary Landscape No. 1, for piano, Chinese cymbal, and two variable-speed turntables. Significant music marks the way as milestones, with regard particularly to this CD. Karlheinz Stockhausen's 1959-60 version of Kontakte, for tape, piano, and percussion; Milton Babbitt's 1963-64 Philomel, for soprano, recorded soprano, and synthesized tape; Babbitt's 1974 Reflections, for piano and synthesized tape; Roger Reynolds's Transfigured Wind IV from 1985, for flute, computer, and tape; and Mario Davidovsky's ten Synchronisms, for a variety of solo instruments, ensemble combinations, and tape. Eric Chasalow's choice to study with Davidovsky is significant.
    [Show full text]
  • Teaching Post-Tonal Music to Twenty-First- Century Students Author(S): Miguel A
    Department of Music Theory, Jacobs School of Music, Indiana University A Pedagogical and Psychological Challenge: Teaching Post-Tonal Music to Twenty-First- Century Students Author(s): Miguel A. Roig-Francolí Source: Indiana Theory Review, Vol. 33, No. 1-2 (Summer 2017), pp. 36-68 Published by: Indiana University Press on behalf of the Department of Music Theory, Jacobs School of Music, Indiana University Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2979/inditheorevi.33.1-2.02 Accessed: 03-09-2018 01:27 UTC JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at https://about.jstor.org/terms Indiana University Press, Department of Music Theory, Jacobs School of Music, Indiana University are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Indiana Theory Review This content downloaded from 129.74.250.206 on Mon, 03 Sep 2018 01:27:00 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms A Pedagogical and Psychological Challenge: Teaching Post-Tonal Music to Twenty-First-Century Students Miguel A. Roig-Francolí University of Cincinnati ost-tonal music has a pr problem among young musicians, and many not-so-young ones. Anyone who has recently taught a course on the theory and analysis of post-tonal music to a general Pmusic student population mostly made up of performers, be it at the undergraduate or master’s level, will probably immediately understand what the title of this article refers to.
    [Show full text]
  • A Critical Evaluation of the Nature of Music Education in the Public Schools of British Columbia
    A CRITICAL EVALUATION OF THE NATURE OF MUSIC EDUCATION IN THE PUBLIC SCHOOLS OF BRITISH COLUMBIA David James Phyall Associate in Arts and Science (Music), Capilano College, 1982 B.A., SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY, 1989 THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in the Faculty of Education @ David James Phyall 1993 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY March 1993 All rights reserved. This work may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without permission of the author. APPROVAL Name: David James P hyall Degree: Master of Arts Title of Project: A Critical Evaluation of the Nature of Music Education in the Public Schools of British Columbia Examining Committee: Chair: Anne Corbishley Robert Walker Senior Supervisor Owen Underhill Associate Professor School for the Contemporary Arts - Allan ~lin&an Professor Music Department, UBC Allan MacKinnon Assistant Professor Faculty of Education Simon Fraser University External Examiner Date Approved: 2 b7 3/73 Partial Copyright License I hereby grant to Simon Fraser University the right to lend my thesis, project or extended essay (the title of which is shown below) to users of the Simon Fraser University Library, and to make partial or single copies only for such users or in response to a request from the library of any other university, or other educational institution, on its own behalf or for one of its users. I further agree that permission for multiple copying of this work for scholarly purposes may be granted by me or the Dean of Graduate Studies. It is understood that copying or publication of this work for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission.
    [Show full text]
  • Miriam Gideon's Cantata, the Habitable Earth
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Major Papers Graduate School 2003 Miriam Gideon's cantata, The aH bitable Earth: a conductor's analysis Stella Panayotova Bonilla Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_majorpapers Part of the Music Commons Recommended Citation Bonilla, Stella Panayotova, "Miriam Gideon's cantata, The aH bitable Earth: a conductor's analysis" (2003). LSU Major Papers. 20. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_majorpapers/20 This Major Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Major Papers by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MIRIAM GIDEON’S CANTATA, THE HABITABLE EARTH: A CONDUCTOR’S ANALYSIS A Monograph Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Musical Arts in The School of Music by Stella Panayotova Bonilla B.M., State Academy of Music, Sofia, Bulgaria, 1991 M.M., Louisiana State University, 1994 August 2003 ©Copyright 2003 Stella Panayotova Bonilla All rights reserved ii DEDICATION To you mom, and to the memory of my beloved father. iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Thanks to Dr. Kenneth Fulton for his guidance through the years, his faith in me and his invaluable help in accomplishing this project. Thanks to Dr. Robert Peck for his inspirational insight. Thanks to Dr. Cornelia Yarbrough and Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Composing Each Time Robert Morris
    Composing Each Time Robert Morris Introduction Each time I finish a piece, there is little time to rest or reflect; something else demands my attention, and I attend to it. Of course, finishing a piece is not really abrupt; after the first draft, there is revision, computer engraving, and editing. During these tasks, new ideas and conceptions begin to enter consciousness so the experience of writing a particular piece fades even before all the work is done. Later, when I return to a work—to coach a performance or lecture on it—I try to reconstruct the process of composition and return to the way it felt to write it, but much of the passion and clarity that brought the work into being is lost. With some thought of addressing this problem I decided immediately after completing my piano piece Each Time to write about it while the experience of its composition was still fresh in my memory. In this way, I hope to express as vividly as possible what I try to put into a piece and how and why—something which might be useful to future performers or listeners. In some respects, Each Time is not very different from my other piano pieces; however, I wanted to express in music some new insights I had into the phenomenology of time derived from Buddhist philosophy. Rather than spelling this out now, I’ll just say that I composed the piece so it might suggest to an attentive listener that impermanence is at the root of experience and that time is both flowing and discontinuous at once.
    [Show full text]
  • Prolongation, Expanding Variation, and Pitch Hierarchy: a Study of Fred Lerdahl’S Waves and Coffin Hollow
    PROLONGATION, EXPANDING VARIATION, AND PITCH HIERARCHY: A STUDY OF FRED LERDAHL’S WAVES AND COFFIN HOLLOW J. Corey Knoll A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF MUSIC December 2006 Committee: Nora Engebretsen, Advisor Mikel Kuehn, Advisor William Lake Marilyn Shrude ii ABSTRACT Mikel Kuehn, Co-Advisor Nora Engebretsen, Co-Advisor This thesis consists of two independent yet interrelated portions. The theory portion explores connections between Fred Lerdahl’s theoretical and compositional output by examining his work Waves in relation to his theoretical writings, primarily A Generative Theory of Tonal Music and “Tonal Pitch Space.” The theories together form a generative theory of tonal music that strives to create a musical grammar. “Tonal Pitch Space” defines a hierarchy among pitches and chords within and across tonal regions. Lerdahl uses these ideas in Waves, which is in the key of D minor. All other pitch classes, and likewise all other chords and tonal regions, are elaborations of the tonic D. The initial D tonic statement, called a flag motive because it heralds each variation, is the fundamental construct in Waves. Just as all other pitches elaborate D, all other motives in Waves are elaborations of the flag motive. Thus rich hierarchies are established. Lerdahl also incorporates ideas from GTTM into his compositional process. GTTM focuses on four categories of event hierarchies: grouping and metrical structures and time-span and prolongational reductions. These four hierarchies and a set of stability conditions all interact with one another to form a comprehensive musical grammar.
    [Show full text]
  • Modern Art Music Terms
    Modern Art Music Terms Aria: A lyrical type of singing with a steady beat, accompanied by orchestra; a songful monologue or duet in an opera or other dramatic vocal work. Atonality: In modern music, the absence (intentional avoidance) of a tonal center. Avant Garde: (French for "at the forefront") Modern music that is on the cutting edge of innovation.. Counterpoint: Combining two or more independent melodies to make an intricate polyphonic texture. Form: The musical design or shape of a movement or complete work. Expressionism: A style in modern painting and music that projects the inner fear or turmoil of the artist, using abrasive colors/sounds and distortions (begun in music by Schoenberg, Webern and Berg). Impressionism: A term borrowed from 19th-century French art (Claude Monet) to loosely describe early 20th- century French music that focuses on blurred atmosphere and suggestion. Debussy "Nuages" from Trois Nocturnes (1899) Indeterminacy: (also called "Chance Music") A generic term applied to any situation where the performer is given freedom from a composer's notational prescription (when some aspect of the piece is left to chance or the choices of the performer). Metric Modulation: A technique used by Elliott Carter and others to precisely change tempo by using a note value in the original tempo as a metrical time-pivot into the new tempo. Carter String Quartet No. 5 (1995) Minimalism: An avant garde compositional approach that reiterates and slowly transforms small musical motives to create expansive and mesmerizing works. Glass Glassworks (1982); other minimalist composers are Steve Reich and John Adams. Neo-Classicism: Modern music that uses Classic gestures or forms (such as Theme and Variation Form, Rondo Form, Sonata Form, etc.) but still has modern harmonies and instrumentation.
    [Show full text]
  • MTO 17.1: Fitzpatrick, Models and Music Theory
    Volume 17, Number 1, April 2011 Copyright © 2011 Society for Music Theory Models and Music Theory: Reconsidering David Lewin’s Graph of the 3-2 Cohn Cycle Michael Fitzpatrick NOTE: The examples for the (text-only) PDF version of this item are available online at: http://www.mtosmt.org/issues/mto.11.17.1/mto.11.17.1.fitzpatrick.php REFERENCE: http://www.mtosmt.org/issues/mto.07.13.4/mto.07.13.4.reed_bain.html REFERENCE: http://www.mtosmt.org/issues/mto.07.13.3/mto.07.13.3.nolan.html KEYWORDS: Cohn functions, Cohn cycles, Iconic models, David Lewin, Reed and Bain ABSTRACT: Iconic models are ubiquitous in music theoretical literature. Their purpose is to illustrate and thereby concretize abstract theoretical concepts that would otherwise exist only in the imagination. Despite the prevalence of iconic models, we find few comprehensive analyses of how they serve this purpose and the conceptual mechanisms that relate models to their subjects. This commentary is a case study that compares two competing music theory models and raises some of the questions that arise when evaluating a particular model’s fit with its theoretical subject. Here, I examine Reed and Bain’s assertion that their Tonnetz design provides a more satisfactory depiction of the sc 3-2 Cohn cycle than David Lewin’s graphic network of the same. By relating the iconic components of each model with elements of the theory, I suggest that Lewin’s network corresponds more accurately to the sc 3-2 Cohn cycle than Reed and Bain’s Tonnetz. Received August 2010 Introduction [1] In a recent issue of this journal, Jacob Reed and Matthew Bain (2007) review David Lewin’s (1996, 1998) graphic network of the set-class (sc) 3-2 Cohn cycle and his analysis of J.
    [Show full text]