Subtropical Deserts
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Spatially-Explicit Modeling of Modern and Pleistocene Runoff and Lake Extent in the Great Basin Region, Western United States
Spatially-explicit modeling of modern and Pleistocene runoff and lake extent in the Great Basin region, western United States Yo Matsubara1 Alan D. Howard1 1Department of Environmental Sciences University of Virginia P.O. Box 400123 Charlottesville, VA 22904-4123 Abstract A spatially-explicit hydrological model balancing yearly precipitation and evaporation is applied to the Great Basin Region of the southwestern United States to predict runoff magnitude and lake distribution during present and Pleistocene climatic conditions. The model iteratively routes runoff through, and evaporation from, depressions to find a steady state solution. The model is calibrated with spatially-explicit annual precipitation estimates and compiled data on pan evaporation, mean annual temperature, and total yearly runoff from stations. The predicted lake distribution provides a close match to present-day lakes. For the last glacial maximum the sizes of lakes Bonneville and Lahontan were well predicted by linear combinations of decrease in mean annual temperature from 0 to 6 °C and increases in precipitation from 0.8 to 1.9 times modern values. Estimated runoff depths were about 1.2 to 4.0 times the present values and yearly evaporation about 0.3 to 1 times modern values. 2 1. Introduction The Great Basin of the southwestern United States in the Basin and Range physiographic province contains enclosed basins featuring perennial and ephemeral lakes, playas and salt pans (Fig. 1). The Great Basin consists of the entire state of Nevada, western Utah, and portions of California, Idaho, Oregon, and Wyoming. At present it supports an extremely dry, desert environment; however, about 40 lakes (some reaching the size of present day Great Lakes) episodically occupied the Great Basin, most recently during the last glacial maximum (LGM) [Snyder and Langbein, 1962; Hostetler et al., 1994; Madsen et al., 2001]. -
North American Deserts Chihuahuan - Great Basin Desert - Sonoran – Mojave
North American Deserts Chihuahuan - Great Basin Desert - Sonoran – Mojave http://www.desertusa.com/desert.html In most modern classifications, the deserts of the United States and northern Mexico are grouped into four distinct categories. These distinctions are made on the basis of floristic composition and distribution -- the species of plants growing in a particular desert region. Plant communities, in turn, are determined by the geologic history of a region, the soil and mineral conditions, the elevation and the patterns of precipitation. Three of these deserts -- the Chihuahuan, the Sonoran and the Mojave -- are called "hot deserts," because of their high temperatures during the long summer and because the evolutionary affinities of their plant life are largely with the subtropical plant communities to the south. The Great Basin Desert is called a "cold desert" because it is generally cooler and its dominant plant life is not subtropical in origin. Chihuahuan Desert: A small area of southeastern New Mexico and extreme western Texas, extending south into a vast area of Mexico. Great Basin Desert: The northern three-quarters of Nevada, western and southern Utah, to the southern third of Idaho and the southeastern corner of Oregon. According to some, it also includes small portions of western Colorado and southwestern Wyoming. Bordered on the south by the Mojave and Sonoran Deserts. Mojave Desert: A portion of southern Nevada, extreme southwestern Utah and of eastern California, north of the Sonoran Desert. Sonoran Desert: A relatively small region of extreme south-central California and most of the southern half of Arizona, east to almost the New Mexico line. -
Central Basin and Range Ecoregion
Status and Trends of Land Change in the Western United States—1973 to 2000 Edited by Benjamin M. Sleeter, Tamara S. Wilson, and William Acevedo U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1794–A, 2012 Chapter 20 Central Basin and Range Ecoregion By Christopher E. Soulard This chapter has been modified from original material Wasatch and Uinta Mountains Ecoregion, on the north by the published in Soulard (2006), entitled “Land-cover trends of Northern Basin and Range and the Snake River Basin Ecore- the Central Basin and Range Ecoregion” (U.S. Geological gions, and on the south by the Mojave Basin and Range and Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2006–5288). the Colorado Plateaus Ecoregions (fig. 1). Most of the Central Basin and Range Ecoregion is located in Nevada (65.4 percent) and Utah (25.1 percent), but small segments are also located Ecoregion Description in Idaho (5.6 percent), California (3.7 percent), and Oregon (0.2 percent). Basin-and-range topography characterizes the The Central Basin and Range Ecoregion (Omernik, 1987; Central Basin and Range Ecoregion: wide desert valleys are U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1997) encompasses bordered by parallel mountain ranges generally oriented north- approximately 343,169 km² (132,498 mi2) of land bordered on south. There are more than 33 peaks within the Central Basin the west by the Sierra Nevada Ecoregion, on the east by the and Range Ecoregion that have summits higher than 3,000 m 120° 118° 116° 114° 112° EXPLANATION 42° Land-use/land-cover class Northern Basin ECSF Snake River Basin Water Forest and Range Developed Grassland/Shrubland Transitional Agriculture Mining Wetland MRK Barren Ice/Snow Ecoregion boundary 40° WB Sample block (10 x 10 km) 0 50 100 150 MILES 0 50 100 150 KILOMETERS WUM OREGON IDAHO bo um ld 38° H t R iver Ogden Sparks Reno 80 Sierra Truckee River Lockwood GREAT Tooele Nevada Salt Carson River Lake Walker RiverBASIN City Walker Lake SIERRA NEVADA CCV Mojave DESERT UTAH Basin and Range Colorado NEVADA 36° SCCCOW Plateaus SCM ANMP CALIFORNIA Figure 1. -
Algae and Invertebrates of a Great Basin Desert Hot Lake: a Description of the Borax Lake Ecosystem of Southeastern Oregon
Conference Proceedings. Spring-fed Wetlands: Important Scientific and Cultural Resources of the Intermountain Region, 2002. http://www.wetlands.dri.edu Algae and Invertebrates of a Great Basin Desert Hot Lake: A description of the Borax Lake ecosystem of southeastern Oregon Joseph Furnish Pacific Southwest Region 5, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Vallejo, CA [email protected] James McIver Pacific Northwest Research Station, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, LaGrande, OR Mark Teiser Department of Oceanography, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR Abstract Introduction As part of the recovery plan for the Borax Lake is a geothermally heated endangered chub Gila boraxobius (Cyprinidae), alkaline lake in southeastern Oregon. It a description of algal and invertebrate represents one of the only permanent water populations was undertaken at Borax Lake in sources in the Alvord Desert, which receives 1991 and 1992. Borax Lake, the only known less than 20 cm of rain annually (Green 1978; habitat for G. boraxobius, is a warm, alkaline Cobb et al. 1981). Borax Lake is the only known water body approximately 10 hectares in size habitat for Gila boraxobius, the Borax Lake with an average surface water temperature of chub, a cyprinid fish recognized as a new 30°C. Periphyton algae were surveyed by species in 1980. The chub was listed as scraping substrates and incubating microscope endangered under the Endangered Species Act slides in the water column. Invertebrates were in 1982 because it was believed that geothermal- collected using dip nets, pitfall traps and Ekman energy test-well drilling activities near Borax dredges. The aufwuchs community was Lake might jeopardize its habitat by altering the composed of 23 species and was dominated by flow or temperature of water in the lake. -
Informe De Avance Iabin Ecosystem Grant
INFORME DE AVANCE IABIN ECOSYSTEM GRANT: DIGITALIZACIÓN DE DATOS E INFORMACIÓN, DEPURACIÓN Y ESTANDARIZACIÓN DE PISOS DE VEGETACIÓN DE CHILE Patricio Pliscoff, Federico Luebert, Corporación Taller La Era, Santiago, Chile, 30 de Septiembre de 2008. Resumen Se ha ingresado el 50,6% de la información bibliográfica recopilada para el desarrollo de la base de información puntual georeferenciada de inventarios de vegetación. Se ha depurado el 68,5% del total de pisos de vegetación de la cartografía digital. Se ha comenzado el proceso de estandarización de la clasificación de pisos de vegetación con el estándar de metadatos del IABIN, encontrando algunas dificultades en el ingreso de información. Las equivalencias entre pisos de vegetación y sistemas ecológicos ya ha sido finalizada. Abstract The 50.6% of the compiled bibliographic references for the development of the georeferenced database of vegetation inventories have been included. The 68.5% of vegetation belts of the digital cartography have been debbuged and fixed. The standarization process of vegetation belts has been begun, entering data into the IABIN ecosystem standard, finding some difficulties in the information entrance. The equivalences between vegetation belts and ecological systems has already been finished. Objetivos del Proyecto 1) Generación de una base de información puntual georeferenciada de inventarios de vegetación. 2) Depuración de cartografía digital de pisos vegetacionales. 3) Estandarizar la clasificación de Pisos de vegetación con los estándares de metadatos de IABIN y con la clasificación de Sistemas Ecológicos de NatureServe. Productos y resultados esperados De acuerdo con los objetivos mencionados, se espera obtener los siguientes resultados: - Una base de datos georeferenciada de puntos con inventarios de vegetación chilena - Una cartografía depurada de pisos de vegetación de Chile (Luebert & Pliscoff 2006) - Un esquema de equivalencias entre la clasificación de pisos de vegetación de Chile (Luebert & Pliscoff 2006) y la clasificación de sistemas ecológicos de NatureServe (2003). -
Sensitivity of the Colorado Plateau to Change: Climate, Ecosystems, and Society
Copyright © 1969 by the author(s). Published here under license by the Resilience Alliance. Schwinning, S., J. Belnap, D. R. Bowling, and J. R. Ehleringer. 2008. Sensitivity of the Colorado Plateau to change: climate, ecosystems, and society. Ecology and Society XX(YY): ZZ. [online] URL: http://www.ec ologyandsociety.org/volXX/issYY/artZZ/ Synthesis Sensitivity of the Colorado Plateau to Change: Climate, Ecosystems, and Society Susan Schwinning, Jayne Belnap 1, David R. Bowling 2, and James R. Ehleringer 2 ABSTRACT. The Colorado Plateau is located in the interior, dry end of two moisture trajectories coming from opposite directions, which have made this region a target for unusual climate fluctuations. A multi- decadal drought event some 850 years ago may have eliminated maize cultivation by the first human settlers of the Colorado Plateau, the Fremont and Anasazi people, and contributed to the abandonment of their settlements. Even today, ranching and farming are vulnerable to drought and struggle to persist. The recent use of the Colorado Plateau primarily as rangeland has made this region less tolerant to drought due to unprecedented levels of surface disturbances that destroy biological crusts, reduce soil carbon and nitrogen stocks, and increase rates of soil erosion. The most recent drought of 2002 demonstrated the vulnerability of the Colorado Plateau in its currently depleted state and the associated costs to the local economies. New climate predictions for the southwestern United States include the possibility of a long-term shift to warmer, more arid conditions, punctuated by megadroughts not seen since medieval times. It remains to be seen whether the present-day extractive industries, aided by external subsidies, can persist in a climate regime that apparently exceeded the adaptive capacities of the Colorado Plateau’s prehistoric agriculturalists. -
For Creative Minds
The For Creative Minds educational section may be photocopied or printed from our website by the owner of this book for educational, non-commercial uses. Sheet music for the songs, cross-curricular teaching activities, interactive quizzes, and more are availableFor online. Creative Go to www.ArbordalePublishing.com Minds and click on the book’s cover to explore all the links. Some deserts are hot, and some are cold, but the one thing that all deserts have in common is that they are dry. OnThe average, Desert a desert Habitat gets less than 10 to 12 inches (25- 30 cm) of rain a year. Some do not even get that much. The driest place on Earth, the Atacama Desert in South America has areas that haven’t seen any rain in 400 years! Hot (tropical or subtropical) deserts are warm throughout the year, but very hot in the summer. Temperatures drop at night to cool or cold. Rain comes in short bursts any time of the year and may even evaporate before it hits the ground. There Polar deserts have long, cold winters and can have are long, dry periods in between rain showers. The snow- or ice-covered ground. Chihuahan, Sonoran, and Mojave Deserts in Mexico Antarctica and parts of Arctic and the American Southwest are hot deserts. The Europe and North America Sahara and Kalahari Deserts in Africa are also hot. are polar deserts. Coastal deserts are found along Cold winter deserts (also called semi-arid continental coasts and have salty deserts) have cold winters with some soils or sand. -
Technology, Disposal
ACTA BOTANICA NEERLANDICA, Vol. 4 (3), 1955 Plant Growth under Desert Conditions BY F.W. Went (Earhart Plant Research Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, Calif, U.S.A.) [received July 6th, 1955) the last I have visited desert in different of During years areas parts I I the world, and have found that they were differing more than had expected from published descriptions. I would, therefore, like to stress some of the differences which were observed. The deserts visited include: (1) The fog desert along the Peruvian coast in the neighborhood of Lima. Dr. Ferreyra and Engineer Postigo were kind enough to of take me around and show me some of the typical aspects this desert including the so-called Lomas. (2) The dust desert which was found in the Northern Sahara around Beni where Killian the of the Ounif Dr. kindly put facilities Station Biologique Saharienne at my disposal. (3) The clear but dry deserts of Southern California and Israel. The latter were visited through the help of Drs. Boyko, Dr. Zohary and Dr. Evenari. The following table gives some comparison between a number of typical localities. TABLE I Comparison between the vegetation of different deserts. Altitude Rel. Daily Radi- Precipi- Vegeta- in Humi- temp. ation tation tion meters dity fluctuât. Peru, coast 0 low high small 25 mm 0 Lomas 300 low v. small 125 high „ good Beni Ounif 800 in low desert ter- v. 125 Algeria, great „ med. Elat 0 low 25 desert v. v. Israel, high great „ Subeita 500 v. low 125 desert- high great „ steppe -50 low 35 desert So. -
Three Invasive Annual Grasses in the Great Basin Desert Downy Brome (Cheatgrass), Medusahead, and Ventenata
OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION SERVICE RECOGNIZING AND IDENTIFYING Three Invasive Annual Grasses in the Great Basin Desert Downy Brome (Cheatgrass), Medusahead, and Ventenata Fara Ann Brummer, Pete Schreder, Grace Haskins, and Jason Jaeger Invasive annual grasses are a threat to the Great Basin desert ecosystem. They compromise habitat diversity for important wildlife species such as the greater sage-grouse. They shorten the grazing season for livestock, and do not provide as much consistent forage biomass and quality as perennial native bunchgrasses. They tend to be much smaller, have less overall leaf area, and capitalize on early season moisture. In fact, one annual grass, medusahead, can reduce livestock carrying capacity by 50 to 80 percent. Invasive annual grasses typically have a shallow root system. Shallow root systems limit forage availability to early season use, particularly during drought years. Once these grasses gain a foothold, they can progressively dominate a system, as they germinate in the fall and generally “green up” earlier than our native grasses. Invasive annual grasses increase wildfire threat as they can provide an abundant source of dry “fine fuels” earlier in the season than native bunchgrasses. The first step in managing these species is awareness of the annual grass and surrounding range conditions that are most at risk to invasion. Once an invasive annual grass has been identified in an area, strategies to limit their impact should be long-term and consistent to ensure the health of rangelands and pastures. The three major invasive annuals included in this publication are Map: Great Basin Landscape Conservation Cooperative downy brome (cheatgrass), medusahead wildrye, and ventenata. -
The Contribution of Fog to the Moisture and Nutritional Supply of Arthraerua
The contribution of fog to the moisture and nutritional supply of Arthraerua leubnitziae in the central Namib Desert, Namibia Tunehafo Ruusa Gottlieb Thesis presented for the degree of Master of Science in the Department of Environmental and Geographical Science University of Cape Town October 2017 Supervisors: A. Prof Frank Eckardt, Department of Environmental and Geographical Science A. Prof Michael Cramer, Department of Biological Sciences Declaration ‘I know the meaning of plagiarism and declare that all of the work in the dissertation (or thesis), save for that which is properly acknowledged, is my own’. Tunehafo Ruusa Gottlieb, October 2017 i Acknowledgements I would first like to thank my supervisors for their time and energy in support of the successful completion of this research. Thank you for your constructive criticism and effort you put in reviewing this thesis. Frank Eckardt, thank you for all your assistance, and for communicating and contributing ideas clearly. Michael Cramer, thank you for your tremendous support and constant engagement. I am grateful for your patience as you engaged with all the challenges I brought to your attention. Thank you, Mary Seely, for the discussion that led to the development of this project and for giving me a chance to be part of the FogNet project at Gobabeb. The financial assistance from the Environmental Investment Fund of Namibia (EIF), National Commission on Research Science and Technology (NCRST), University of Cape Town and Gobabeb Research and Training Centre is greatly appreciated. I would like to thank Novald Iiyambo, for assisting me with my data collection. I could never have sampled 500 plants without all your assistance. -
Deserts Province
Province-Specific Conservation Strategies – Deserts 5.6 Deserts Province 5.6.1 Geophysical and Ecological Description of the Province The Deserts Province extends from the California-Mexico border on the south and Colorado River on the southeast north to Topaz Lake on the California-Nevada border (Figure 5.6-1). The province’s western border is formed by the Peninsula Mountain Ranges and Transverse Mountain Range in southern California, and the Sierra Nevada in central California. The province is the extension of desert regions located to the east and south of California in the states of Nevada and Arizona, and in Mexico. The Deserts Province has five different subregions: from north to south these are the Mono subregion, the Southeastern Great Basin, Mojave Desert, Sonoran Desert, and Colorado Desert. Each subregion has unique combinations of climate, topography, ecology, and land-use patterns. The province as a whole is in the rain shadow of mountain ranges that form the western border. The dry landscape created by this barrier is characterized by unique geologic features composed of cliffs, peaks, canyons, dry washes, sand dunes, and large dry lake playas. Elevations are generally low in the southern portion of the province and rise to the north. The elevation in the south (Sonoran and Colorado deserts subregion) is generally below 1,000 feet with the lowest point at 275 feet below sea level in the Salton Trough. The topography of the more northerly portion of the province (Mojave Desert subregion) is characterized by a moderately high plateau: elevations range from 282 feet below sea level in Death Valley to 11,000 feet above sea level in the Panamint Mountains. -
The San Joaquin Desert of California: Ecologically Misunderstood and Overlooked
Natural Areas Journal . to advance the preservation of natural diversity A publication of the Natural Areas Association - www.naturalarea.org © Natural Areas Association The San Joaquin Desert of California: Ecologically Misunderstood and Overlooked David J. Germano1,6 1Department of Biology California State University Bakersfield, California, 93311-1022 Galen B. Rathbun2 Lawrence R. Saslaw3 Brian L. Cypher4 Ellen A. Cypher4 Larry M. Vredenburgh5 2Department of Ornithology and Mammalogy California Academy of Sciences Golden Gate Park, San Francisco c/o P.O. Box 202 Cambria, California 93428 3U.S. Bureau of Land Management Bakersfield, California 93308 4Endangered Species Recovery Program California State University-Stanislaus P.O. Box 9622 Bakersfield, CA 93389 5U. S. Bureau of Land Management Bakersfield, California 93308 6 Corresponding author: [email protected]; 661-654-2471 Natural Areas Journal 31:138–147 R E S E A R C H A R T I C L E ABSTRACT: The vegetation community of the San Joaquin Valley of California has been formally classified as a perennial grassland based largely on assumptions of past climax state. However, histori- cal records suggest that the region might be more accurately classified as a desert. The distinction is important in determining the appropriate management strategies for this ecosystem, particularly for the • many rare and endemic taxa that reside there. Abiotic and biotic factors–including low precipitation, arid soils, and desert-adapted plants and vertebrate–are consistent with conditions typical of desert ar- eas. We examined the distributions of these factors to define the extent of the San Joaquin Desert. We conclude that the San Joaquin Desert historically encompassed 28,493 km2 including the western and The San Joaquin southern two thirds of the San Joaquin Valley, and the Carrizo Plain and Cuyama Valley to the south- west.