DOCSLIB.ORG

Would You Know If You Were Being Stalked?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Would You Know If You Were Being Stalked? Would you know if you were being stalked? Security and safety advice for victims Useful information Professional, discreet and timely advice and support is always available from: BBC Safety Advice Line: 0370 411 0464 or ext 0464 [email protected] Head of Corporate Security: [email protected] BBC Investigation Service: 020 875 24168 [email protected] In an emergency always contact the police by dialling 999. Safety-Stalking_advice_Feb2011 2 31 May. 12 Would you know what to do about it, or where to get help? This leaflet has been produced by BBC Safety as a guide for use by television/radio personalities, managers and staff on how to recognise acts of harassment and stalking, what to do about it, and where to get help. It is not uncommon in the BBC, or any other media organisation, for those who appear on television or radio to fall victim to the attention of those who are fixated in some way with their work. People usually associate the word “stalking” with being followed about or telephoned by a person whom they may or may not know, to the point where it becomes at the least a nuisance and at the worst a confrontation with the stalker. However, very often stalking begins in what might appear to be much more innocent activity such as the sending of letters or e-mails of adoration, the sending of gifts of flowers or chocolates. Sometimes these gifts and letters encourage a response from the recipient, and once this is achieved the stalker usually is encouraged by the contact to step up their activity and intensify the contact arrangements, more often than not taking it to a level where they wish to meet the person who is the centre of their attention. I’d get thirty bouquets of flowers in a month – Friends would say “Aren’t you lucky?” I was terrified. Tracey Morgan – Victim of stalking. The potential for presenters and staff to become the victim of the attention of a stalker (harassment) is regarded as high. This is especially so where the victim has a high public profile. A stalker can generally be defined as someone who does something that is calculated to annoy or cause discomfort to another, or to threaten another with violence. Examples of stalking range from making unsolicited telephone calls, sending letters, parcels and e-mails, to following victims, and waiting outside work premises or home address, etc. Safety-Stalking_advice_Feb2011 3 31 May. 12 Television presenter Jill Dando had been the victim a stalker, who employed most of the contact tactics described above in the months leading up to her murder outside her home address in Fulham in 1999. The individual making the unsolicited contact was eliminated from the police enquiry in the early stages of the murder investigation, but admitted stalking her. Another man was eventually charged with her murder, but his conviction was subsequently quashed. Jill Dando Presenter Murdered in London 1999 There have been many other cases before and since that dreadful murder, where presenters have fallen victim to the unsolicited attention of men or women who use a number of tactics to harass our staff. Where you can get help if you are a victim of stalking or harassment. Legislation has been in existence since 1997 in the form of the Prevention from Harassment Act. To help deal with stalking issues a National Stalking Helpline (Tel: 0300 636 0300) has been established with a website http://www.stalkinghelpline.org/. If you are in immediate danger call 999. Tell the operator you want the police, tell them who you are, where you are, and what is happening. If the threat does not appear to pose an immediate danger, contact the BBC Investigation Unit or the Head of Corporate Security, where the expertise in these matters resides. This will also enable confidential co- ordination of resources (police, local security, mail checks, etc.) Safety-Stalking_advice_Feb2011 4 31 May. 12 The following prevention advice and recommendations are offered in the first instance. There are a number of other options which may be invoked to deal with stalking, details of which may be obtained by contacting the BBC Investigation Unit or the Head of Corporate Security. How you should deal with unwanted attention. If you become the subject of unwarranted attention and unwelcome intrusion into your private life this must be reported to your employer, agent, or the police (if appropriate) at the earliest opportunity. It is strongly recommended that on screen/on air personalities do not go to meet unexpected callers at BBC Gates or Receptions, without verifying the visitors bona fide. Do not arrange for personal packages to be delivered to BBC Receptions as they will not receive the security screening carried at goods inwards and mail rooms. All physical evidence must be retained in order to substantiate the instigation of appropriate legal restraining procedures at an early stage. For example letters, packages, e-mails, voice messages and texts should all be kept as evidence and records of the harassment. These items should be handed to the police if they are involved, or the BBC Investigation Service. If your work results in you having a high public profile you must ensure that any instance of pestering or stalking is reported in full to the BBC Investigation Service from the beginning and on every subsequent occasion it occurs. Failure to act early may severely disadvantage you should the actions continue to a more intense stage. Co-operative action between the subject/victim and the BBC is to the advantage of both parties if the cause of the unwelcome attention is due in any way to the nature of the victim's work. Safety-Stalking_advice_Feb2011 5 31 May. 12 The actions of individuals who indulge in “stalking” and similar practices are extremely difficult to anticipate. They also often have a strong belief in the justification for what they are doing. This 'justification' is often beyond the comprehension of others and the most innocent of events can sometimes trigger unpredictable and violent behaviour. Advice for travelling to work and home WHAT SHOULD I DO IF I THINK I AM BEING FOLLOWED? If you believe you are being followed:- • if you have a mobile phone, contact the police and follow their advice; • if you do not have a mobile phone, attempt to drive to a police station if nearby, or return to your place of work; • failing this go into a large petrol station (preferably with CCTV cameras) and ask staff to telephone the local police; • if possible write down the: Registration Number - Colour - Make - Model of the vehicle following you. Also make a note of the numbers and description of the occupants. IF YOU THINK YOU ARE BEING FOLLOWED DO NOT RETURN HOME! Stalkers may know some of your route home and follow from any given location. Consider varying your times and route to and from work. Do not display any BBC stickers in your car (parking permits etc). IF YOU THINK YOU ARE IN DANGER DIAL 999 Safety-Stalking_advice_Feb2011 6 31 May. 12 Advice for when you are at home WHAT SHOULD I DO IF I HAVE HARASSMENT PROBLEMS AT HOME? If you are visited at home by a stalker, phone your local police. Tell them where you work and why you believe you are the victim of harassment. Inform the BBC Investigation Service. Draw your curtains and go to a room away from where the stalker is standing. If family or friends are expected to visit, ask them to delay their visit until you contact them again. When Police arrive ask for their ID before allowing entry. DO NOT ENGAGE IN DISCUSSION WITH THE STALKER - THEY WANT YOU TO REACT If you discover incidents of damage to your property, inform your local police immediately. Tell them where you work. Also inform the BBC Investigation Service. Consider asking your telephone company to make your home telephone number ex-directory. Ask neighbours in area if they see anything suspicious at your home to contact local police. Stalkers may rummage through your rubbish bins and retrieve private information. With this in mind it is good practice to shred any papers with your personal information on them. Neighbours themselves have been targeted in the past. Consider making them aware of your concerns. If you find a suspect package left at your home:- **DO NOT OPEN OR TAMPER WITH IT** Place it down carefully in a safe place where no one will touch it and call the Police immediately via 999. Safety-Stalking_advice_Feb2011 7 31 May. 12 Friends & Family What Should I Tell Them? Friends and family should be made fully aware of your current circumstances. Stalkers have targeted friends and family in the past. Family may receive telephone calls from the stalker. Advise them to ask for the name, address and telephone number of the caller. Remember to do a 1471 number check. Tell your family not to give your personal details to anyone without your knowledge and permission. Advise your family to be vigilant and give them information on what to look for when receiving mail. Tell them not to open anything they believe may be suspicious. Contact the local police for advice. If they receive an abusive or threatening phone call at home, remind them to do a 1471 check. Contact your local police station and the BBC Investigation Service. It may be worth considering supplying family members with a mobile phone for personal safety. If suspicious persons approach them in the street - go to the nearest place of safety - i.e.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Inspirational Students Give New Year Cheer
    WORLE COMMUNITY SCHOOL An Academy News from Worle Community School and Priory Community School Academies ISSUE 2 - WINTER TERM 2019 W e s t o n THEin partnership with Weston Hospicecare POSTHospicecare Deadline 1st March DOG and HOG Winners will be published in WORDS250 The Post and in an ebook. 250 SHORT STORY Amazing prizes! WORDS250 See back page for COMPETITION full details. Please get in touch for tours at any time: PCSA [email protected] WCSA [email protected] General [email protected] INSPIRATIONAL STUDENTS GIVE NEW YEAR CHEER PRIORY Student Aiden Hunt, 11, They are two of thousands of students in won a Child of Courage award for Weston and Worle that have stories to make Aiden and Lewis are truly us proud. his positive attitude and inspiration inspirational young people. through five operations for a brain Neville Coles, Executive Principal of The “ “ tumour. Priory Learning Trust, said: We value kindness, courage And budding Ed Sheeran WCSA By Lacey Madge, 13, and positivity at our schools student Lewis Edwards, 11, has Aimee Braithwaite, 12, and these two are brilliant helped raise £60,000 for people in Olivia Finch, 13, examples of this need with his singing. and Leah Duffy, 12. INSIDE THIS ISSUE Jill Dando legacy lives on Singing Students Shine ME student trains TPLT pup Thousands of brilliant Weston and Arley, Emilio and Kezia map out After meeting Olly Murs, Jeffrey Worle students become part of world singing futures after links PLT is trained by amazing charity- unique Jill Dando News Centre, with Elvis and Robbie Williams.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    CURRICULUM VITAE Benjamin F. Stickle Middle Tennessee State University Department of Criminal Justice Administration 1301 East Main Street - MTSU Box 238 Murfreesboro, Tennessee 37132 [email protected] www.benstickle.com (615) 898-2265 EDUCATION Doctor of Philosophy, 2015, Justice Administration University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky Master of Science, 2010, Justice Administration University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky Bachelor of Arts, 2005, Sociology Cedarville University, Cedarville, Ohio ACADEMIC POSITIONS Middle Tennessee State University, Department of Criminal Justice Administration 2019 – Present Associate Professor 2016 – 2019 Assistant Professor Campbellsville University, Department of Criminal Justice Administration 2014 – 2016 Assistant Professor 2011 – 2014 Instructor (Full-time) University of Louisville, Department of Justice Administration 2014 – 2015 Lecturer ADMINISTRATIVE POSITIONS Middle Tennessee State University, Department of Criminal Justice Administration 2018 – Present Coordinator, Online Bachelor of Criminal Justice Administration 2018 – Present Chair, Curriculum Committee Campbellsville University, Department of Criminal Justice Administration 2011-2016 Site Coordinator, Louisville Education Center PROFESSIONAL APPOINTMENTS & AFFILIATIONS 2019 – Present Affiliated Faculty, Political Economy Research Institute, Middle Tennessee State University 2017 – Present Senior Fellow for Criminal Justice, Beacon Center of Tennessee Ben Stickle CV, Page 2 AREAS OF SPECIALIZATION • Property Crime: Metal
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    CURRICULUM VITAE Benjamin F. Stickle Middle Tennessee State University Department of Criminal Justice Administration 1301 East Main Street - MTSU Box 238 Murfreesboro, Tennessee 37132 [email protected] www.benstickle.com (615) 898-2265 EDUCATION Doctor of Philosophy, 2015, Justice Administration University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky Master of Science, 2010, Justice Administration University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky Bachelor of Arts, 2005, Sociology Cedarville University, Cedarville, Ohio ACADEMIC POSITIONS Middle Tennessee State University, Department of Criminal Justice Administration 2019 – Present Associate Professor 2016 – 2019 Assistant Professor Campbellsville University, Department of Criminal Justice Administration 2014 – 2016 Assistant Professor 2011 – 2014 Instructor (Full-time) University of Louisville, Department of Justice Administration 2014 – 2015 Lecturer ADMINISTRATIVE POSITIONS Middle Tennessee State University, Department of Criminal Justice Administration 2018 – Present Coordinator, Online Bachelor of Criminal Justice Administration 2018 – Present Chair, Curriculum Committee Campbellsville University, Department of Criminal Justice Administration 2011-2016 Site Coordinator, Louisville Education Center PROFESSIONAL APPOINTMENTS & AFFILIATIONS 2019 – Present Affiliated Faculty, Political Economy Research Institute, Middle Tennessee State University 2017 – Present Senior Fellow for Criminal Justice, Beacon Center of Tennessee Ben Stickle CV, Page 2 AREAS OF SPECIALIZATION • Property Crime: Metal
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of Abuja Crime Hotspot Mapping and Analysis
    GEO-SPATIAL TECHNOLOGIES FOR NIGERIAN URBAN SECURITY AND CRIME MANAGEMENT - A STUDY OF ABUJA CRIME HOTSPOT MAPPING AND ANALYSIS Adepoju M. O, Halilu S. A, S.O. Mohammed, Ozigis S. M, Idris I, Blessing A, Adeluyi O. A National Space Research and Development Agency Strategic Space Application Department Abuja, Nigeria. [email protected]; [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]. ABSTRACT Abuja is one of the fastest growing cities in the sub-Sahara Africa. The city lacks the modern management techniques for an effective crime mapping, monitoring and management to meet the attainment of liveable environment despite its aesthetically pleasing outlook of a modern city. The cities of the developed world are managed with the intelligence provided by Geo-spatial technologies. The advances in space technologies have made the onerous task of managing crime possible. However, the availability of these technologies has not been exploited, utilised nor domesticated by various institutions charged with the responsibility of city planning and management to attain secure and safe environment in Nigerian urban and rural communities. Geographic information systems, remote sensing and allied technologies have manifested in various forms in the last four decades particularly since the launch of LANDSAT earth observatory satellites these has provided baseline information for intelligence gathering. The very high resolution images provided by the new generation of satellites have made the integration of GIS/RS for urban crime mapping not only possible but also effective for day-to-day running and management of many aspects of city life. The NigeriaSat-2 and Ortho-rectified Quick-Bird images, basemap, master plan and questionnaires were used to generate the crime dataset which was later aggregated to show the crime hotspots and Coldspots areas within the residential districts of Abuja Federal Capital City, Phase 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Barry George in Protest Over Compensation Rules”
    Networked Knowledge Media Reports Networked Knowledge Compensation Homepage This page set up by Dr Robert N Moles On 23 February 2015 the BBC reported “Barry George in protest over compensation rules” Barry George, the man wrongfully convicted of the murder of Jill Dando, has told the BBC that a decision not to award him compensation is "a mockery of justice". He is among four men protesting in London on Monday against a tightening of the criteria for compensation in so-called "miscarriage of justice" cases. Mr George says he "lost everything" while serving eight years in prison. The MoJ said only people who proved their innocence could get compensation. Mr George was convicted of murdering Jill Dando in 2001 but was acquitted of the killing at a retrial in 2008 after doubt was cast on the reliability of gunshot residue evidence. His family has tried and failed twice to get compensation for him and are now campaigning for a change in the law. 'Hugely damaged' Mr George, along with three other men who have had their convictions quashed - Victor Nealon, Martin Foran and James Boyle - will protest later outside a global law summit taking place in central London. The government introduced new legislation in 2014 which made changes to the compensation scheme, creating a statutory definition of what constitutes a "miscarriage of justice". Now compensation is only paid when the court quashes a conviction because a new fact has emerged to show beyond reasonable doubt that the applicant did not commit the offence. In an interview with Radio 5 live Breakfast, Mr George's sister Michelle Bates said: "In the British justice system you are innocent until proven guilty.
    [Show full text]
  • Making Sense of Crime
    MAKING SENSE OF CRIME The challenges of evidence on the causes of crime and policies to reduce it. Published in 2015 CONTRIBUTORS The contributors met over 2014 and 2015 to review the public debate on crime and crime policy; to identify insights from research that put this debate into context; and to edit the guide. With thanks to everyone else who reviewed all or part of the guide, including: Geoffrey Payne, Niral Vadera, Milly Zimeta, Jonathan Breckon, David Derbyshire and Rachel Tuffin and to the Alliance for Useful Evidence for hosting a meeting of the contributors. DR ALEX DR ALEX PROFESSOR PROFESSOR JON SUTHERLAND THOMPSON JONATHAN SILVERMAN Research leader in Research and SHEPHERD Research professor of communities, safety and Policy Officer, Director, Violence media and criminal justice, RAND Europe; Sense About Science Research Group and justice, University of research associate, professor of oral and Bedfordshire; former Institute of Criminology, maxillofacial surgery, BBC Home Affairs University of Cambridge Cardiff University correspondent PROFESSOR DR LISA NICK DR PRATEEK KEN PEASE MORRISON- ROSS BUCH Visiting professor of COULTHARD Chairman, UCL Jill Policy director, crime science, Lead policy Dando Institute of Evidence Matters Department of Security advisor, British Security and Crime campaign, Sense and Crime Science, Psychological Society Science; former About Science University College Crimewatch presenter London, and University of Loughborough PROFESSOR TRACEY RICHARD WORTLEY BROWN Director, UCL Jill Dando Director, Sense Institute of Security and About Science Crime Science CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 01. HOW POLITICIANS AND THE MEDIA SHAPE WHAT WE THINK ABOUT CRIME 02. THERE ARE MORE RELIABLE WAYS OF MEASURING CRIME THAN POLICE STATISTICS 03.
    [Show full text]
  • Home Abusers 'Likely to Commit Other Crimes'
    THE GUARDIAN (London) March 20, 2004 Home Abusers ‘Likely to Commit Other Crimes’ By Rosie Cowan, Crime Correspondent Domestic abusers are much more likely to commit other crimes but police are failing to make crucial connections, according to Metroplitan police research. A study of 400 offences and perpetrators, mostly men, discovered that at least 70% of those who had physically assaulted partners had a criminal history. Around one in 12 had sexual convictions, or there was intelligence that they had been involved in other rapes or sexual assaults. Of those who had sexually abused a partner, one in four were committing offences outside the home and one in eight were considered highly dangerous. Yet only 29% of those who had raped or sexually assaulted a partner were on the national DNA database. Laura Richards, a senior behavioural consultant with the Met’s racial and violent crime taskforce, said officers often did not swab domestic abusers for DNA because consent rather than identification was at issue, and they were not considering the offender as a suspect for other crimes. But she said it was vital for detectives to realise that men who beat up or raped wives or girlfriends were also “good candidates” for stranger rapes. She pointed to a large number of murderers who had a history of physical, sexual or psychological domestic abuse - the Soham killer Ian Huntley; Graham Coutts, who strangled Brighton teacher Jane Longhurst; Barry George who shot Jill Dando; and serial killer, Fred West. There was also the recent case of M25 rapist, Antoni Imiela, who had previous convictions for burglary and assault, who raped at least eight women and girls and was eventually caught through DNA.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Enterprise
    Plymouth Law and Criminal Justice Review (2013) 1 REDEFINING MURDER: JOINT ENTERPRISE Nicola Mitchell-Rodd1 Abstract This article explores the evolution of secondary liability and the unforgiving doctrine of joint enterprise in homicide cases. Exploration of the current law ensues to determine if the distinct decisions of their Lordships in both Powell and Rahman have failed to sufficiently clarify the law; followed by in depth analysis of the Law Commission and Ministry of Justice proposals to reform this infamously disputed area of law. Keywords: secondary liability, joint enterprise, murder, manslaughter, reform Introduction In January 2012, 19 years after his horrific, heart-wrenching demise, justice for Steven Lawrence finally prevailed. The doctrine of joint enterprise allowed the jury at the Old Bailey to finally convict two of Lawrence’s alleged killers of his brutal murder. However, just days later, headlines read ‘MPs call for new gang murder law’,2 following the publication of the Commons Justice Select Committee’s Report on joint enterprise, projecting the notorious and controversial debate over the common law doctrine back into the national media.3 Joint enterprise is a complex principle that allows multiple parties to a crime to be convicted of the same offence. Therefore, in cases of murder liability will be imposed not only to the principal offender who inflicts the lethal blow but also any secondary parties who have been involved in the commission of the crime. However, it has been the subject of severe scrutiny and review for several years. Arguably there is a particular problem with secondary liability to 1 Nicola is currently undertaking the Legal Practice Course at Plymouth University.
    [Show full text]
  • September 2014
    Why does it ‘This is take so long? NOT me’ Challenging wrongful The reality of prison is convictions is not suited on the other side of the to those who demand fence, with the people Scottish instant results, says that have no choice ... the National Newspaper for Prisoners & Detainees independence Paul May the family How would the UK pages ............... 32-33 page ...................... 38 A ‘not for profit’ publication / ISSN 1743-7342 / Issue No. 183 / September 2014 / www.insidetime.org fare without Scotland? An average of 60,000 copies distributed monthly - Independently verified by the Audit Bureau of Circulations EDUCATION SUPPLEMENT INSIDE plus over 450,000 monthly online readership - Independently verified using SMARTER STATS page ...................... 13 There is no crisis! Chris Grayling, the Justice Secretary, told Radio 4’s Today Programme ‘I am absolutely clear there is not a crisis in our prisons’ Eric McGraw population increase was caused largely by a growth in the remand population. hese are Mr Grayling’s first comments on prisons since a recent run of reports Nick Hardwick, the Chief Inspector of Prisons, highlighting overcrowding, violence says that prison numbers are rising while there and suicides. He also told Parlia- is a severe staff shortage and the curriculum ment some weeks earlier that there inside prisons is all but non-existent. And Twas no overcrowding. Everyone else seems to Nigel Newcomen, the Prisons and Probation know that Britain’s prisons are full to bursting. Ombudsman, adds that the poor conditions At the end of March this year, 77 of the 119 in prisons are contributing to a growing prisons in England and Wales were overcrowded.
    [Show full text]
  • (Re)Thinking 'Gangs'
    Runnymede Perspectives (Re)thinking ‘Gangs’ Claire Alexander About Runnymede The Runnymede Trust is an independent policy research organization focusing on equality and justice through the promotion of a successful multi-ethnic society. Founded as a Charitable Educational Trust, Runnymede has a long track record in policy research, working in close collaboration with eminent thinkers and policymakers in the public, private and voluntary sectors. We believe that the way ahead lies in building effective partnerships, and we are continually developing these with the voluntary sector, the government, local authorities and companies in the UK and Europe. We stimulate debate and suggest forward-looking strategies in areas of public policy such as education, the criminal justice system, employment and citizenship. Since 1968, the date of Runnymede’s foundation, we have worked to establish and maintain a posi- tive image of what it means to live affirmatively within a society that is both multi-ethnic and cultur- ally diverse. Runnymede continues to speak with a thoughtful and independent public voice on these issues today. Acknowledgements The author would like to thank the following people for their comments on earlier drafts of this piece: Robert Berkeley, Wendy Bottero, Dick Hobbs, Malcolm James, Caroline Knowles, Yasmeen Narayan, Coretta Phillips, Paul Rock and Kjartan Sveinsson. The author would also like to thank Olivia Munos-Rojas for her help with compiling the newspaper sources used in this piece, and the participants of the ‘Doing Race’ seminar at Durham University in January 2008 for their helpful comments in shaping this argument. ISBN-13: 978-1-9067320-0-4 (print) EAN: 9781906732004 (print) ISBN-13: 978-1-9067320-1-1 (online) EAN: 9781906732011 (online) Published by Runnymede in June 2008, this document is copyright © 2008 the Runnymede Trust.
    [Show full text]
  • On Limiting the Use of Bayes In
    When ‘neutral’ evidence still has probative value (with implications from the Barry George Case) Norman Fenton1, Daniel Berger, David Lagnado, Martin Neil, Anne Hsu July 2013 Abstract The likelihood ratio (LR) is a probabilistic method that has been championed as a ‘simple rule’ for evaluating the probative value of forensic evidence in court. Intuitively, if the LR is greater than one then the evidence supports the prosecution hypothesis; if the LR is less than one it supports the defence hypothesis, and if the LR is equal to one then the evidence favours neither (and so is considered 'neutral' - having no probative value). It can be shown by Bayes’ theorem that this simple relationship only applies to pairs of hypotheses for which one is the negation of the other (i.e. to mutually exclusive and exhaustive hypotheses) and is not applicable otherwise. We show how easy it can be - even for evidence experts - to use pairs of hypotheses that they assume are mutually exclusive and exhaustive but are not, and hence to arrive at erroneous conclusions about the value of evidence using the LR. Furthermore, even when mutually exclusive and exhaustive hypotheses are used there are extreme restrictions as to what can be concluded about the probative value of evidence just from a LR. Most importantly, while the distinction between source- level hypotheses (such as defendant was/was not at the crime scene) and offence-level hypotheses (defendant is/is not guilty) is well known, it is not widely understood that a LR for evidence about the former generally has no bearing on the LR of the latter.
    [Show full text]
  • Trial by Media1 Judiciary Working Group Session 1 November 2012
    Union Internationale des Avocats: 56th Annual Congress, Dresden Judges, tabloids and trial by media1 Judiciary Working Group Session 1 November 2012 Illustration: Front page of the Sun, 23 March 2011, criticizing judges for being soft on crime. One of their main targets was Lord Justice Leveson; the Sun complained that Leveson LJ “introduced proposals to let 4,000 assault convicts [sic] a year go free rather than face jail”. Introduction Winning in the court of public opinion can be as important as winning in court. This gives the media, especially tabloids, power not only to write about court proceedings, but to influence them. Editorials complaining about “soft” sentencing, recommendations for law reform and accounts of criminal trials form a significant part of the newsgathering process. However, some trials seem to grip the public imagination, and the resultant blizzard of media stories may provoke concerns that the trial process is being overtaken by “trial by media”. Most journalists and media academics consider there is already a satisfactory balance between protection of the judicial process and freedom of expression; all that is needed is a responsive self-regulatory body2 for those cases where there is misconduct. What sort of regulation (if any) 1 Judge J C Gibson, District Court of NSW, Australia; President, Judiciary Working Group. 2 See the proposed models for a revised PCC discussed by Damian Carney, “Media Accountability After the Phone Hacking Inquiry”, Meejalaw 30 August 2012. For media commentary, see “Self-regulation of the press is flawed, but reform is no easy matter”, the Guardian, 20 July 2011.
    [Show full text]