DOCSLIB.ORG

Rhea's Internal Structure Inferred from Cassini Gravity and Topography

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rhea's Internal Structure Inferred from Cassini Gravity and Topography 46th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference (2015) 1069.pdf RHEA'S INTERNAL STRUCTURE INFERRED FROM CASSINI GRAVITY AND TOPOGRAPHY Doug Hemingway1 ([email protected]), Francis Nimmo1, Paolo Tortora2, Marco Zannoni2, Luciano Iess3, Marzia Parisi3, and Peter Thomas4. 1Department of Earth & Planetary Sciences, University of California Santa Cruz, 1156 High Street, Santa Cruz, California, 95064, USA, 2Dipartimento di Ingegneria Industriale, Università di Bologna, Forlì, Italy, 3Dipartimento di Ingegneria Meccanica e Aerospaziale, Sapienza Università di Roma, Rome, Italy, 4Department of Astronomy, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA. Summary: Combined analyses of gravity and to- pography can yield useful information about the interi- or structures of planetary bodies [1–4]. Based on radio tracking of the Cassini spacecraft, we present an esti- mate of the gravity field of Saturn's large moon Rhea. Combining this with a shape model based on limb pro- file analyses, we attempt to constrain Rhea's internal structure, concluding that the core likely exhibits some excess flattening. Gravity: During its time in the Saturn system, Cas- sini has performed two close fly-bys of Rhea devoted to gravity investigations: one in November 2005, and another in March 2013. As in previous work [2,4,5], the gravity field of Rhea was estimated by reconstruct- ing the spacecraft trajectory during these encounters, making use of precise measurements of the Doppler Figure 1: J2 and C22 dimensionless gravitational potential shift of a highly stable microwave radio link between coefficients for Rhea, with crosshairs illustrating the one- Cassini and the ground station antennas of NASA's sigma uncertainties. Expected hydrostatic values of J2 and Deep Space Network. C22 are indicated for various normalized moments of inertia The available data were analyzed in a multi-arc fit along the theoretical hydrostatic line (dashed line). estimating a fully unconstrained quadrupole gravity field for Rhea, the Rhea state vector at a reference (uncertainties are all one-sigma). Figure 2 illustrates epoch, and the spacecraft initial state vector for each how the shape compares with the hydrostatic expecta- fly-by. The stability of the solutions was tested by per- tion for various assumed moments of inertia. The cen- turbing the dynamical model in various ways, includ- tral value is close to the expectation for a nearly ho- ing estimating a full 4x4 gravity field and changing the mogeneous, hydrostatic body, however the uncertain- a priori uncertainties. ties are large. The resulting estimate of Rhea's gravity field ex- Internal Structure: There are a number of ways to hibits a statistically significant departure from the hy- explain the excess oblateness (higher than expected drostatic expectation (Figure 1), with a J2/C22 ratio of J2/C22 ratio) in Rhea's gravity field that are consistent 3.9±0.1 (the hydrostatic ratio is ~3.33). As a result, the with the observed shape. moment of inertia cannot be inferred directly from the Homogeneous Model: If Rhea is of uniform densi- Radau-Darwin approximation. Estimating the moment ty, it can be shown [8,3,4] that the shape required to of inertia directly from the J2 or C22 coefficients yields explain the observed gravity is given by incompatible and unrealistic estimates of ~0.41 and !!!! ! � = � (1) ~0.37, respectively. !" ! !" Shape: Rhea's shape has been determined previ- where R is Rhea's mean radius, and �!" and �!" ously via analyses of limb profiles [6,7]. After incorpo- are spherical harmonic coefficients of degree l and rating the latest available data, we repeat this analysis, order m, representing the dimensionless gravitational obtaining a best-fitting tri-axial ellipsoid with semi- potential and topography, respectively. In addition to axes: the J2 and C22 values estimated from limb profile ob- a = 765.7 ± 0.3 km, servations, Figure 2 shows the values obtained from b = 763.6 ± 0.3 km, equation (1) based on the gravity coefficients illustrat- c = 762.9 ± 0.2 km, ed in Figure 1. The gravity field is thus consistent with from which we obtain the unnormalized degree-2 a homogeneous Rhea of the observed shape, to within coefficients: J2 = 1190 ± 260 m, C22 = 350 ± 120 m the shape model's uncertainties. 46th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference (2015) 1069.pdf Figure 3: Required J2 and C22 core-mantle-boundary to- Figure 2: Limb-profile-based estimates of the J2 and C22 pography for each of four different mantle thicknesses (5, topography coefficients for Rhea, with crosshairs illustrating 100, 200, & 400 km) relative to the expected hydrostatic the one-sigma uncertainties. Also shown is the surface to- line (dashed black line), assuming the surface conforms to pography required for a homogeneous Rhea to produce the our shape model. For each assumed mantle thickness, the observed gravity field, computed from equation (1). corresponding moment of inertia factor is given in the legend. Two-Layer Model: Considering that the surface is not significantly overestimated the C22 topography, most likely water ice [9,10], it may be more realistic to then some excess core oblateness (roughly 1 km) is assume some internal layering. Here, we consider a required to account for the observed gravity field. This simple two-layer model: silicate core and H2O mantle. excess core topography implies stresses of ~0.3 MPa, We assume the density of the mantle is 920 kg/m3 and which are readily supported by cold silicate materials. we examine a series of different core densities. For With larger mantle thicknesses, the core-mantle- each assumed core density, we compute the core radius boundary is deeper and so larger amplitudes are re- required to satisfy the observed bulk density constraint quired to overcome the resulting attenuation of the (� = 1236 kg/m3). gravity signal. If the surface conforms closely to the central values Conclusions: The observed shape is consistent of our shape model, then the excess oblateness of the with the shape required for an undifferentiated (uni- gravity field requires an irregular core shape (i.e., ob- form density) Rhea to account for the observed gravity. lateness at the core-mantle-boundary that is beyond the However, because the surface is more likely to be wa- hydrostatic expectation)—similar concepts have been ter ice, a two-layer model may be a better approxima- considered previously for Enceladus [6,11] and Mimas tion (cf. [5]). In this case, and assuming a mantle densi- [12]. With this two-layer model, we can solve for the ty of 920 kg/m3, some ~1 km of excess core oblateness core-mantle-boundary topography required to give rise may be necessary to account for the observed gravity to the observed gravity field (e.g., [11,13]). Given a (Figure 3). A wide range of moments of inertia is al- known gravity field and surface topography, expressed lowed, but models with low moments of inertia (i.e., in spherical harmonics, it can be shown that the re- more differentiation) require greater magnitudes of quired topography at the core-mantle-boundary is giv- excess core topography to satisfy the observations. en by ! ! !!! !!!! !! �!"# = � − � �! (2) References: 1.Wieczorek, M. A. in Treatise Geophys. 10, 165– !" ∆! !!! ! !" ! !" 206 (2007). 2. Iess, L. et al. Science 327, 1367–9 (2010). 3. !"# where �!" is the core-mantle-boundary topogra- Hemingway, D., et al. Nature 500, 550–552 (2013). 4. Iess, L. et al. phy at degree l and order m, ∆� is the density contrast Science 344, 78–80 (2014). 5. Anderson, J. D. & Schubert, G. Geophys. Res. Lett. 34, L02202 (2007). 6. Thomas, P. et al. Icarus at the core-mantle-boundary, d is the depth of the core- 190, 573–584 (2007). 7. Nimmo, F., Bills, B. G. & Thomas, P. C. J. mantle-boundary (� = � − �!"#$), � is Rhea's bulk Geophys. Res. 116, E11001 (2011). 8. Jeffreys, H. (Cambridge density, R is Rhea's full radius, � is the density of the University Press, 1976). 9. Clark, R. N. & Owensby, P. D. The ! infrared spectrum of Rhea. Icarus 46, 354–360 (1981). 10. Stephan, mantle, �!" is the dimensionless gravitational potential K. et al. Planet. Space Sci. 61, 142–160 (2012). 11. McKinnon, W. ! resolved at radius R, and �!" is the surface topogra- B. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 118, n/a–n/a (2013). 12. Tajeddine, R. et phy. al. Science (80-. ). 346, 322–324 (2014). 13. Lefevre, A., et al. Icarus (2014) As illustrated in Figure 3, if the surface conforms to our shape model (Figure 2), and assuming we have .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cassini Update
    Cassini Update Dr. Linda Spilker Cassini Project Scientist Outer Planets Assessment Group 22 February 2017 Sols%ce Mission Inclina%on Profile equator Saturn wrt Inclination 22 February 2017 LJS-3 Year 3 Key Flybys Since Aug. 2016 OPAG T124 – Titan flyby (1584 km) • November 13, 2016 • LAST Radio Science flyby • One of only two (cf. T106) ideal bistatic observations capturing Titan’s Northern Seas • First and only bistatic observation of Punga Mare • Western Kraken Mare not explored by RSS before T125 – Titan flyby (3158 km) • November 29, 2016 • LAST Optical Remote Sensing targeted flyby • VIMS high-resolution map of the North Pole looking for variations at and around the seas and lakes. • CIRS last opportunity for vertical profile determination of gases (e.g. water, aerosols) • UVIS limb viewing opportunity at the highest spatial resolution available outside of occultations 22 February 2017 4 Interior of Hexagon Turning “Less Blue” • Bluish to golden haze results from increased production of photochemical hazes as north pole approaches summer solstice. • Hexagon acts as a barrier that prevents haze particles outside hexagon from migrating inward. • 5 Refracting Atmosphere Saturn's• 22unlit February rings appear 2017 to bend as they pass behind the planet’s darkened limb due• 6 to refraction by Saturn's upper atmosphere. (Resolution 5 km/pixel) Dione Harbors A Subsurface Ocean Researchers at the Royal Observatory of Belgium reanalyzed Cassini RSS gravity data• 7 of Dione and predict a crust 100 km thick with a global ocean 10’s of km deep. Titan’s Summer Clouds Pose a Mystery Why would clouds on Titan be visible in VIMS images, but not in ISS images? ISS ISS VIMS High, thin cirrus clouds that are optically thicker than Titan’s atmospheric haze at longer VIMS wavelengths,• 22 February but optically 2017 thinner than the haze at shorter ISS wavelengths, could be• 8 detected by VIMS while simultaneously lost in the haze to ISS.
    [Show full text]
  • A Wunda-Full World? Carbon Dioxide Ice Deposits on Umbriel and Other Uranian Moons
    Icarus 290 (2017) 1–13 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Icarus journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/icarus A Wunda-full world? Carbon dioxide ice deposits on Umbriel and other Uranian moons ∗ Michael M. Sori , Jonathan Bapst, Ali M. Bramson, Shane Byrne, Margaret E. Landis Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: Carbon dioxide has been detected on the trailing hemispheres of several Uranian satellites, but the exact Received 22 June 2016 nature and distribution of the molecules remain unknown. One such satellite, Umbriel, has a prominent Revised 28 January 2017 high albedo annulus-shaped feature within the 131-km-diameter impact crater Wunda. We hypothesize Accepted 28 February 2017 that this feature is a solid deposit of CO ice. We combine thermal and ballistic transport modeling to Available online 2 March 2017 2 study the evolution of CO 2 molecules on the surface of Umbriel, a high-obliquity ( ∼98 °) body. Consid- ering processes such as sublimation and Jeans escape, we find that CO 2 ice migrates to low latitudes on geologically short (100s–1000 s of years) timescales. Crater morphology and location create a local cold trap inside Wunda, and the slopes of crater walls and a central peak explain the deposit’s annular shape. The high albedo and thermal inertia of CO 2 ice relative to regolith allows deposits 15-m-thick or greater to be stable over the age of the solar system.
    [Show full text]
  • Exomoon Habitability Constrained by Illumination and Tidal Heating
    submitted to Astrobiology: April 6, 2012 accepted by Astrobiology: September 8, 2012 published in Astrobiology: January 24, 2013 this updated draft: October 30, 2013 doi:10.1089/ast.2012.0859 Exomoon habitability constrained by illumination and tidal heating René HellerI , Rory BarnesII,III I Leibniz-Institute for Astrophysics Potsdam (AIP), An der Sternwarte 16, 14482 Potsdam, Germany, [email protected] II Astronomy Department, University of Washington, Box 951580, Seattle, WA 98195, [email protected] III NASA Astrobiology Institute – Virtual Planetary Laboratory Lead Team, USA Abstract The detection of moons orbiting extrasolar planets (“exomoons”) has now become feasible. Once they are discovered in the circumstellar habitable zone, questions about their habitability will emerge. Exomoons are likely to be tidally locked to their planet and hence experience days much shorter than their orbital period around the star and have seasons, all of which works in favor of habitability. These satellites can receive more illumination per area than their host planets, as the planet reflects stellar light and emits thermal photons. On the contrary, eclipses can significantly alter local climates on exomoons by reducing stellar illumination. In addition to radiative heating, tidal heating can be very large on exomoons, possibly even large enough for sterilization. We identify combinations of physical and orbital parameters for which radiative and tidal heating are strong enough to trigger a runaway greenhouse. By analogy with the circumstellar habitable zone, these constraints define a circumplanetary “habitable edge”. We apply our model to hypothetical moons around the recently discovered exoplanet Kepler-22b and the giant planet candidate KOI211.01 and describe, for the first time, the orbits of habitable exomoons.
    [Show full text]
  • The Subsurface Habitability of Small, Icy Exomoons J
    A&A 636, A50 (2020) Astronomy https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201937035 & © ESO 2020 Astrophysics The subsurface habitability of small, icy exomoons J. N. K. Y. Tjoa1,?, M. Mueller1,2,3, and F. F. S. van der Tak1,2 1 Kapteyn Astronomical Institute, University of Groningen, Landleven 12, 9747 AD Groningen, The Netherlands e-mail: [email protected] 2 SRON Netherlands Institute for Space Research, Landleven 12, 9747 AD Groningen, The Netherlands 3 Leiden Observatory, Leiden University, Niels Bohrweg 2, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands Received 1 November 2019 / Accepted 8 March 2020 ABSTRACT Context. Assuming our Solar System as typical, exomoons may outnumber exoplanets. If their habitability fraction is similar, they would thus constitute the largest portion of habitable real estate in the Universe. Icy moons in our Solar System, such as Europa and Enceladus, have already been shown to possess liquid water, a prerequisite for life on Earth. Aims. We intend to investigate under what thermal and orbital circumstances small, icy moons may sustain subsurface oceans and thus be “subsurface habitable”. We pay specific attention to tidal heating, which may keep a moon liquid far beyond the conservative habitable zone. Methods. We made use of a phenomenological approach to tidal heating. We computed the orbit averaged flux from both stellar and planetary (both thermal and reflected stellar) illumination. We then calculated subsurface temperatures depending on illumination and thermal conduction to the surface through the ice shell and an insulating layer of regolith. We adopted a conduction only model, ignoring volcanism and ice shell convection as an outlet for internal heat.
    [Show full text]
  • Search for Rings and Satellites Around the Exoplanet Corot-9B Using Spitzer Photometry A
    Search for rings and satellites around the exoplanet CoRoT-9b using Spitzer photometry A. Lecavelier Etangs, G. Hebrard, S. Blandin, J. Cassier, H. J. Deeg, A. S. Bonomo, F. Bouchy, J. -m. Desert, D. Ehrenreich, M. Deleuil, et al. To cite this version: A. Lecavelier Etangs, G. Hebrard, S. Blandin, J. Cassier, H. J. Deeg, et al.. Search for rings and satellites around the exoplanet CoRoT-9b using Spitzer photometry. Astronomy and Astrophysics - A&A, EDP Sciences, 2017, 603, pp.A115. 10.1051/0004-6361/201730554. hal-01678524 HAL Id: hal-01678524 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01678524 Submitted on 16 Jan 2021 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. A&A 603, A115 (2017) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201730554 & c ESO 2017 Astrophysics Search for rings and satellites around the exoplanet CoRoT-9b using Spitzer photometry A. Lecavelier des Etangs1, G. Hébrard1; 2, S. Blandin1, J. Cassier1, H. J. Deeg3; 4, A. S. Bonomo5, F. Bouchy6, J.-M. Désert7, D. Ehrenreich6, M. Deleuil8, R. F. Díaz9; 10, C. Moutou11, and A. Vidal-Madjar1 1 Institut d’astrophysique de Paris, CNRS, UMR 7095 & Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Paris 6, 98bis Bd Arago, 75014 Paris, France e-mail: [email protected] 2 Observatoire de Haute-Provence, CNRS/OAMP, 04870 Saint-Michel-l’Observatoire, France 3 Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias, 38205 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain 4 Universidad de La Laguna, Dept.
    [Show full text]
  • Observing the Universe
    ObservingObserving thethe UniverseUniverse :: aa TravelTravel ThroughThrough SpaceSpace andand TimeTime Enrico Flamini Agenzia Spaziale Italiana Tokyo 2009 When you rise your head to the night sky, what your eyes are observing may be astonishing. However it is only a small portion of the electromagnetic spectrum of the Universe: the visible . But any electromagnetic signal, indipendently from its frequency, travels at the speed of light. When we observe a star or a galaxy we see the photons produced at the moment of their production, their travel could have been incredibly long: it may be lasted millions or billions of years. Looking at the sky at frequencies much higher then visible, like in the X-ray or gamma-ray energy range, we can observe the so called “violent sky” where extremely energetic fenoena occurs.like Pulsar, quasars, AGN, Supernova CosmicCosmic RaysRays:: messengersmessengers fromfrom thethe extremeextreme universeuniverse We cannot see the deep universe at E > few TeV, since photons are attenuated through →e± on the CMB + IR backgrounds. But using cosmic rays we should be able to ‘see’ up to ~ 6 x 1010 GeV before they get attenuated by other interaction. Sources Sources → Primordial origin Primordial 7 Redshift z = 0 (t = 13.7 Gyr = now ! ) Going to a frequency lower then the visible light, and cooling down the instrument nearby absolute zero, it’s possible to observe signals produced millions or billions of years ago: we may travel near the instant of the formation of our universe: 13.7 By. Redshift z = 1.4 (t = 4.7 Gyr) Credits A. Cimatti Univ. Bologna Redshift z = 5.7 (t = 1 Gyr) Credits A.
    [Show full text]
  • Accretion of Saturn's Mid-Sized Moons During the Viscous
    Accretion of Saturn’s mid-sized moons during the viscous spreading of young massive rings: solving the paradox of silicate-poor rings versus silicate-rich moons. Sébastien CHARNOZ *,1 Aurélien CRIDA 2 Julie C. CASTILLO-ROGEZ 3 Valery LAINEY 4 Luke DONES 5 Özgür KARATEKIN 6 Gabriel TOBIE 7 Stephane MATHIS 1 Christophe LE PONCIN-LAFITTE 8 Julien SALMON 5,1 (1) Laboratoire AIM, UMR 7158, Université Paris Diderot /CEA IRFU /CNRS, Centre de l’Orme les Merisiers, 91191, Gif sur Yvette Cedex France (2) Université de Nice Sophia-antipolis / C.N.R.S. / Observatoire de la Côte d'Azur Laboratoire Cassiopée UMR6202, BP4229, 06304 NICE cedex 4, France (3) Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, M/S 79-24, 4800 Oak Drive Pasadena, CA 91109 USA (4) IMCCE, Observatoire de Paris, UMR 8028 CNRS / UPMC, 77 Av. Denfert-Rochereau, 75014, Paris, France (5) Department of Space Studies, Southwest Research Institute, Boulder, Colorado 80302, USA (6) Royal Observatory of Belgium, Avenue Circulaire 3, 1180 Uccle, Bruxelles, Belgium (7) Université de Nantes, UFR des Sciences et des Techniques, Laboratoire de Planétologie et Géodynamique, 2 rue de la Houssinière, B.P. 92208, 44322 Nantes Cedex 3, France (8) SyRTE, Observatoire de Paris, UMR 8630 du CNRS, 77 Av. Denfert-Rochereau, 75014, Paris, France (*) To whom correspondence should be addressed ([email protected]) 1 ABSTRACT The origin of Saturn’s inner mid-sized moons (Mimas, Enceladus, Tethys, Dione and Rhea) and Saturn’s rings is debated. Charnoz et al. (2010) introduced the idea that the smallest inner moons could form from the spreading of the rings’ edge while Salmon et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Rings and Moons of Saturn 1 Rings and Moons of Saturn
    PYTS/ASTR 206 – Rings and Moons of Saturn 1 Rings and Moons of Saturn PTYS/ASTR 206 – The Golden Age of Planetary Exploration Shane Byrne – [email protected] PYTS/ASTR 206 – Rings and Moons of Saturn 2 In this lecture… Rings Discovery What they are How to form rings The Roche limit Dynamics Voyager II – 1981 Gaps and resonances Shepherd moons Voyager I – 1980 – Titan Inner moons Tectonics and craters Cassini – ongoing Enceladus – a very special case Outer Moons Captured Phoebe Iapetus and Hyperion Spray-painted with Phoebe debris PYTS/ASTR 206 – Rings and Moons of Saturn 3 We can divide Saturn’s system into three main parts… The A-D ring zone Ring gaps and shepherd moons The E ring zone Ring supplies by Enceladus Tethys, Dione and Rhea have a lot of similarities The distant satellites Iapetus, Hyperion, Phoebe Linked together by exchange of material PYTS/ASTR 206 – Rings and Moons of Saturn 4 Discovery of Saturn’s Rings Discovered by Galileo Appearance in 1610 baffled him “…to my very great amazement Saturn was seen to me to be not a single star, but three together, which almost touch each other" It got more confusing… In 1612 the extra “stars” had disappeared “…I do not know what to say…" PYTS/ASTR 206 – Rings and Moons of Saturn 5 In 1616 the extra ‘stars’ were back Galileo’s telescope had improved He saw two “half-ellipses” He died in 1642 and never figured it out In the 1650s Huygens figured out that Saturn was surrounded by a flat disk The disk disappears when seen edge on He discovered Saturn’s
    [Show full text]
  • Enceladus Probe Mission Design Using Titan Aerogravity-Assist
    15th International Planetary Probe Workshop, June 11–15, 2018, Boulder, Colorado Enceladus Probe Mission Design Using Titan Aerogravity-Assist Ye Lu | Ph.D. Candidate | [email protected] Sarag Saikia | [email protected] Purdue University, School of Aeronautics and Astronautics West Lafayette, IN 47907 Friday, June 15, 2018 Motivation • Larger launch vehicle (SLS, Falcon Heavy, BFR) – More delivered mass Higher arrival velocity – Shorter time of flight Propulsive orbit insertion Aerocapture/Aerogravity-assist • Aerocapture feasibility study – Requires different sets of interplanetary trajectories – At Titan, L/D = 0.3 requires and enables arrival velocity of 5 km/s • Expand mission envelope – Explore the benefit of aeroassist during the proposal phase 1 Why Enceladus? • Life? • Enceladus Mission studies Life Investigation For Enceladus Life Finder Journey to Enceladus Explorer of Enceladus and Enceladus (LIFE) (ELF) and Titan (JET) Titan (E2T) • Using Titan Aerogravity-Assist for Enceladus Orbit/Lander 2 What is Titan Aerogravity-Assist (AGA)? Titan RT = 1,221,870 km VT = 5.58 km/s P = 16 days Enceladus RE = 238,000 km VE = 12.63 km/s P = 33 hours V∞, Saturn 3 Transfer Orbit to Enceladus • Direct Transfer to Enceladus after Titan AGA • Moon tours at Tethys, Dione, and Rhea Moon of Saturn Tethys Dione Rhea Titan Distance from Saturn, in 4.89 6.26 8.74 20.27 Saturn radii ΔV capture at Enceladus 0.65 km/s 1.35 km/s 2.19 km/s 3.71 km/s 4 Titan AGA • Assumptions: – Low-L/D lifting vehicle – Circular orbit and planar motion • Trajectory constraints
    [Show full text]
  • Perfect Little Planet Educator's Guide
    Educator’s Guide Perfect Little Planet Educator’s Guide Table of Contents Vocabulary List 3 Activities for the Imagination 4 Word Search 5 Two Astronomy Games 7 A Toilet Paper Solar System Scale Model 11 The Scale of the Solar System 13 Solar System Models in Dough 15 Solar System Fact Sheet 17 2 “Perfect Little Planet” Vocabulary List Solar System Planet Asteroid Moon Comet Dwarf Planet Gas Giant "Rocky Midgets" (Terrestrial Planets) Sun Star Impact Orbit Planetary Rings Atmosphere Volcano Great Red Spot Olympus Mons Mariner Valley Acid Solar Prominence Solar Flare Ocean Earthquake Continent Plants and Animals Humans 3 Activities for the Imagination The objectives of these activities are: to learn about Earth and other planets, use language and art skills, en- courage use of libraries, and help develop creativity. The scientific accuracy of the creations may not be as im- portant as the learning, reasoning, and imagination used to construct each invention. Invent a Planet: Students may create (draw, paint, montage, build from household or classroom items, what- ever!) a planet. Does it have air? What color is its sky? Does it have ground? What is its ground made of? What is it like on this world? Invent an Alien: Students may create (draw, paint, montage, build from household items, etc.) an alien. To be fair to the alien, they should be sure to provide a way for the alien to get food (what is that food?), a way to breathe (if it needs to), ways to sense the environment, and perhaps a way to move around its planet.
    [Show full text]
  • What Has Saturn and a Flightless Bird That Is a Resident of the South
    What has Saturn and a flightless bird that is a resident of the South American Pampas have in common? If you do or do not know the answer, continue reading about Rhea, one of Saturn’s Moons. I will provide the answer at the end of this article. In Greek mythology, the Titaness daughter of the earth goddess, Gaia and the sky god Uranus was Rhea, which is the name given to Saturn’s second largest moon, the subject for this month. Rhea was discovered by Giovanni Cassini on December 23rd 1652. At its discovery, Cassini referred to Rhea as one of four Sidera Lodoicea (star of Louis) after King Louis XIV. The other three were also moons discovered by Cassini and were Tethys, Dione and Iepetus, all of which will hopefully be covered in future articles. Rhea was also referred to as Saturn V, denoting the fifth moon in distance from Saturn itself. Although Rhea is the second largest moon of Saturn, its diameter is a mere 949 miles, which is less than a third of Titan, Saturn’s largest moon. It is a small cold airless body and is tidally locked to Saturn, which means, as our own Moon, the same side faces the parent planet at all times. Fig 1 Rhea The surface temperature of this icy body is -174⁰C on the sunlit side and down to a very cold -220⁰C in shaded areas. As can be seen above it has high reflectivity, which would indicate that it probably is composed of water ice. The Cassini probe, which is currently studying Saturn and its moons, has determined that Rhea has a density of 1.233 times that of liquid water, which suggests that it probably comprises three quarters ice and one quarter rock.
    [Show full text]
  • The Habitability of Icy Exomoons
    University of Groningen Master thesis Astronomy The habitability of icy exomoons Supervisor: Author: Prof. Floris F.S. Van Der Tak Jesper N.K.Y. Tjoa Dr. Michael \Migo" Muller¨ June 27, 2019 Abstract We present surface illumination maps, tidal heating models and melting depth models for several icy Solar System moons and use these to discuss the potential subsurface habitability of exomoons. Small icy moons like Saturn's Enceladus may maintain oceans under their ice shells, heated by en- dogenic processes. Under the right circumstances, these environments might sustain extraterrestrial life. We investigate the influence of multiple orbital and physical characteristics of moons on the subsurface habitability of these bodies and model how the ice melting depth changes. Assuming a conduction only model, we derive an analytic expression for the melting depth dependent on seven- teen physical and orbital parameters of a hypothetical moon. We find that small to mid-sized icy satellites (Enceladus up to Uranus' Titania) locked in an orbital resonance and in relatively close orbits to their host planet are best suited to sustaining a subsurface habitable environment, and may do so largely irrespective of their host's distance from the parent star: endogenic heating is the primary key to habitable success, either by tidal heating or radiogenic processes. We also find that the circumplanetary habitable edge as formulated by Heller and Barnes (2013) might be better described as a manifold criterion, since the melting depth depends on seventeen (more or less) free parameters. We conclude that habitable exomoons, given the right physical characteristics, may be found at any orbit beyond the planetary habitable zone, rendering the habitable zone for moons (in principle) arbitrarily large.
    [Show full text]