Reg. No. G-2/RNP/GOA/32/2015-2017 RNI No. GOAENG/2002/6410 Panaji, 26th February, 2015 (Phalguna 7, 1936) SERIES II No. 48

PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY

Note:- There are four Extraordinary issues to the Certificate of Registration Official Gazette, Series II No. 47 dated 19-02-2015 The Altinho Apartments Co-op. Housing as follows:— Maintenance Society Ltd., Near St. Mary Primary School Alto, Mapusa, Bardez-Goa, has been (1) Extraordinary dated 19-02-2015 from pages registered on 09-12-2014 and it bears registration 1003 to 1008 regarding Orders/Notifications code symbol No. GEN-68/NZ/Goa. It is classified from Department of Elections & Notifications as “Housing Maintenance Society” in terms of from Department of Panchayati Raj & Rule 8(1)(7) and sub-classified as “Co-operative Community Development. Housing Maintenance Society” under sub-rule 7(d) (2) Extraordinary (No. 2) dated 20-02-2015 from of Rule 8(1) of the Goa Co-operative Societies pages 1009 to 1010 regarding Order from Rules, 2003. Department of Panchayati Raj & Community Sd/- (V. B. Devidas), Asstt. Registrar of Co-op. Development. Societies (North Zone). (3) Extraordinary (No. 3) dated 20-02-2015 from Mapusa, 9th December, 2014. pages 1011 to 1012 regarding Orders from ______Department of Elections. Notification (4) Extraordinary (No. 4) dated 25-02-2015 from In exercise of the powers vested in me under pages 1013 to 1014 regarding Notifications Section 8(1) of the Goa Co-operative Societies Act, from Department of Elections & Department 2001, Shree Devi Mauli Self Help Group Co-op. of Inland Waterways (Captain of Ports). Society Ltd., H. No. 899, Gokulwadi Near Sai Govind Printing Press, Sankhali-Goa has been registered under code symbol No. GEN-(c)-482/ GOVERNMENT OF GOA /SHG/NZ/Goa. Department of Co-operation Sd/- (V. B. Devidas), Asstt. Registrar of Co-op. Societies (North Zone). Office of the Asstt. Registrar of Co-operative Mapusa, 29th December, 2014. Societies __ Certificate of Registration Notification Shree Devi Mauli Self Help Group Co-op. Society In exercise of the powers vested in me under Ltd., H. No. 899, Gokulwadi Near Sai Govind Section 8(1) of the Goa Co-operative Societies Act, Printing Press, Sankhali-Goa has been registered 2001, the Altinho Apartments Co-op. Housing on 29-12-2014 and it bears registration code Maintenance Society Ltd., Near St. Mary Primary symbol No. GEN-(c)-482/SHG/NZ/Goa. It is classified as “General Society” in terms of Rule School Alto, Mapusa, Bardez-Goa, has been 8(1)(12) and sub-classified as “Other Society” registered under code symbol No. GEN-68/ under sub-rule 12(c) of Rule 8(1) of the Goa /NZ/Goa. Co-operative Societies Rules, 2003. Sd/- (V. B. Devidas), Asstt. Registrar of Co-op. Sd/- (V. B. Devidas), Asstt. Registrar of Co-op. Societies (North Zone). Societies (North Zone). Mapusa, 9th December, 2014. Mapusa, 29th December, 2014.

1015 Suggestions are welcome on e-mail: [email protected] OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA SERIES II No. 48 26TH FEBRUARY, 2015 Notification Notification In exercise of the powers vested in me under No. 5-1594-2015/ARSZ/HSG Section 8(1) of the Goa Co-operative Societies Act, In exercise of the powers vested in me under 2001, Kaloba Self Help Group Co-op. Society Ltd., Section 8 of the Goa Co-operative Societies Act, Bhatwadi, Korgao, Pedne-Goa, has been registered 2001, “The Adolfo Mansion Co-operative Housing under code symbol No. GEN-(c)-483/ Maintenance Society Ltd., Tembi, Margao, /SHG/NZ/Goa. Salcete-Goa” is registered under code symbol No. HSG-(d)-949/South-Goa/2015. Sd/- (V. B. Devidas), Asstt. Registrar of Co-op. Societies (North Zone). Sd/- (A. K. N. Desai), Asstt. Registrar of Co-op. Societies (South Zone). Mapusa, 31st December, 2014. Margao, 6th January, 2015. Certificate of Registration Certificate of Registration Kaloba Self Help Group Co-op. Society Ltd., Bhatwadi, Korgao, Pedne-Goa, has been registered “The Adolfo Mansion Co-operative Housing Maintenance Society Ltd., Tembi, Margao, on 31-12-2014 and it bears registration code Salcete-Goa” has been registered on 6-1-2015 and symbol No. GEN-(c)-483/SHG/NZ/Goa. It is it bears registration code symbol No. HSG-(d)-949/ classified as “General Society” in terms of Rule /South-Goa/2015 and it is classified as “Housing 8(1)(12) and sub-classified as “Other Society” Society” under sub-classification No. 7-(d)- under sub-rule 12(c) of Rule 8(1) of the Goa -Co-operative Housing Maintenance Society, in Co-operative Societies Rules, 2003. terms of Rule 8 of Goa Co-operative Societies Sd/- (V. B. Devidas), Asstt. Registrar of Co-op. Rules, 2003. Societies (North Zone). Sd/- (A. K. N. Desai), Asstt. Registrar of Co-op. Mapusa, 31st December, 2014. Societies (South Zone). ______Margao, 6th January, 2015. ______Notification In exercise of the powers vested in me under Notification Section 8(1) of the Goa Co-operative Societies Act, No. 5-1595-2015/ARSZ 2001, the Green Enclave Co-op. Housing In exercise of the powers vested in me under Maintenance Society Ltd., Verla, Bardez-Goa, has Section 8 of the Goa Co-operative Societies Act, been registered under code symbol No. GEN-69/ 2001, “The Newton Apartments II Co-op. Housing /NZ/Goa. Society Ltd., Mangor Hill, Vasco-da-Gama, Goa” is registered under code symbol No. HSG-(b)-950/ Sd/- (V. B. Devidas), Asstt. Registrar of Co-op. /South-Goa/2015. Societies (North Zone). Sd/- (A. K. N. Desai), Asstt. Registrar of Co-op. Mapusa, 29th December, 2014. Societies (South Zone). Certificate of Registration Margao, 6th January, 2015. The Green Enclave Co-op. Housing Mainte- Certificate of Registration nance Society Ltd., Verla, Bardez-Goa, has been registered on 29-12-2014 and it bears registration “The Newton Apartments II Co-op. Housing Society Ltd., Mangor Hill, Vasco-da-Gama, Goa” code symbol No. GEN-69/NZ/Goa. It is classified has been registered on 6-1-2015 and it bears as “Housing Maintenance Society” in terms of registration code symbol No. HSG-(b)-950/South- Rule 8(1)(7) and sub-classified as “Co-operative -Goa/2015 and it is classified as “Housing Society” Housing Maintenance Society” under sub-rule 7(d) under sub-classification No. 7-(b)-Co-partnership of Rule 8(1) of the Goa Co-operative Societies Housing Society, in terms of Rule 8 of Goa Rules, 2003. Co-operative Societies Rules, 2003. Sd/- (V. B. Devidas), Asstt. Registrar of Co-op. Sd/- (A. K. N. Desai), Asstt. Registrar of Co-op. Societies (North Zone). Societies (South Zone). Mapusa, 29th December, 2014. Margao, 6th January, 2015.

1016 OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA SERIES II No. 48 26TH FEBRUARY, 2015 Notification Notification No. 5-1596-2015/ARSZ/GEN No. 5-1597-2015/ARSZ/GEN In exercise of the powers vested in me under In exercise of the powers vested in me under Section 8 of the Goa Co-operative Societies Act, Section 8 of the Goa Co-operative Societies Act, 2001, “The Valankanni Self Help Group Co-op. 2001, “The Shiv Durga Self Help Group Co-op. Society Ltd., Poriebhatt, Verna Goa,” is registered Society Ltd., Rumdamol Housing Board, under code symbol No. GEN-(c)-143/South-Goa/ Margao-Goa”, is registered under code symbol No. GEN-(c)-144/South-Goa/2015. /2015. Sd/- (A. K. N. Desai), Asstt. Registrar of Co-op. Sd/- (A. K. N. Desai), Asstt. Registrar of Co-op. Societies (South Zone). Societies (South Zone). Margao, 6th January, 2015. Margao, 6th January, 2015. Certificate of Registration Certificate of Registration “The Shiv Durga Self Help Group Co-op. Society “The Valankanni Self Help Group Co-op. Society Ltd., Rumdamol Housing Board, Margao-Goa”, has Ltd., Poriebhatt, Verna Goa,” has been registered been registered on 6-1-2015 and it bears on 6-1-2015 and it bears registration code registration code symbol No. GEN-(c)-144/South- symbol No. GEN-(c)-143/South-Goa/2015 and -Goa/2015 and it is classified as “General Society” it is classified as “General Society” under under sub-classification No. 12-(c)-Other Society sub-classification No. 12-(c)-Other Society in in terms of Rule 8 of Goa Co-operative Societies terms of Rule 8 of Goa Co-operative Societies Rules, 2003. Rules, 2003. Sd/- (A. K. N. Desai), Asstt. Registrar of Co-op. Sd/- (A. K. N. Desai), Asstt. Registrar of Co-op. Societies (South Zone). Societies (South Zone). Margao, 6th January, 2015. Margao, 6th January, 2015. ______Notification Notification No. 5-1599-2015/ARSZ/GEN No. 5-1598-2015/ARSZ/GEN In exercise of the powers vested in me under In exercise of the powers vested in me under Section 8 of the Goa Co-operative Societies Act, Section 8 of the Goa Co-operative Societies Act, 2001, “The Jay Asthavinayak Self Help Group 2001, “Shree Kalpurush Self Help Group Co-op. Co-op. Society Ltd., Culwada, Cuncolim-Goa,” is Society Ltd,. Culwada, Cuncolim, Salcete-Goa,” registered under code symbol No. GEN-(c)-146/ is registered under code symbol No. GEN-(c)-145/ /South-Goa/2015. /South-Goa/2015. Sd/- (A. K. N. Desai), Asstt. Registrar of Co-op. Sd/- (A. K. N. Desai), Asstt. Registrar of Co-op. Societies (South Zone). Societies (South Zone). Margao, 6th January, 2015. Margao, 6th January, 2015. Certificate of Registration Certificate of Registration “The Jay Asthavinayak Self Help Group “Shree Kalpurush Self Help Group Co-op. Co-op. Society Ltd., Culwada, Cuncolim-Goa,” has Society Ltd,. Culwada, Cuncolim, Salcete-Goa,” been registered on 6-1-2015 and it bears has been registered on 6-1-2015 and it bears registration code symbol No. GEN-(c)-146/South- registration code symbol No. GEN-(c)-145/South- -Goa/2015 and it is classified as “General Society” -Goa/2015 and it is classified as “General Society” under sub-classification No. 12-(c)-Other Society under sub-classification No. 12-(c)-Other Society in terms of Rule 8 of Goa Co-operative Societies in terms of Rule 8 of Goa Co-operative Societies Rules, 2003. Rules, 2003. Sd/- (A. K. N. Desai), Asstt. Registrar of Co-op. Sd/- (A. K. N. Desai), Asstt. Registrar of Co-op. Societies (South Zone). Societies (South Zone). Margao, 6th January, 2015. Margao, 6th January, 2015.

1017 OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA SERIES II No. 48 26TH FEBRUARY, 2015 Notification -operative Housing Maintenance Society, in terms No. 5-1593-2014/ARSZ/RES of Rule 8 of Goa Co-operative Societies Rules, 2003. Sd/- (A. K. N. Desai), Asstt. Registrar of Co-op. In exercise of the powers vested in me under Societies (South Zone). Section 8 of the Goa Co-operative Societies Act, 2001, “Navelchea Xetkarancho Ekvott Co-operative Margao, 17th December, 2014. ______Farming Society Ltd., Aquem-Baixo, Navelim, Salcete-Goa,” is registered under code symbol Notification No. FRG-(a)-4/South-Goa/2014. No. 5-1592-2014/ARSZ Sd/- (A. K. N. Desai), Asstt. Registrar of Co-op. In exercise of the powers vested in me under Societies (South Zone). Section 8 of the Goa Co-operative Societies Act, Margao, 23rd December, 2014. 2001, “The Do Rosario Residency Co-op. Housing Society Ltd., Fatima Colony, Dabolim, Goa,” Certificate of Registration is registered under code symbol No. HSG-(b)-948/ “Navelchea Xetkarancho Ekvott Co-operative /South-Goa/2014. Farming Society Ltd., Aquem-Baixo, Navelim, Sd/- (A. K. N. Desai), Asstt. Registrar of Co-op. Salcete-Goa,” has been registered on 23-12-2014 Societies (South Zone). and it bears registration code symbol No. FRG- Margao, 17th December, 2014. -(a)-4/South-Goa/2014 and it is classified as “Farming Society” under sub-classification Certificate of Registration No. 6-(a)-Collective Farming Society in terms of “The Do Rosario Residency Co-op. Housing Rule 8 of Goa Co-operative Societies Rules, 2003. Society Ltd., Fatima Colony, Dabolim, Goa,” has been registered on 17-12-2014 and it bears Sd/- (A. K. N. Desai), Asstt. Registrar of Co-op. registration code symbol No. HSG-(b)-948/South- Societies (South Zone). -Goa/2014 and it is classified as “Housing Margao, 23rd December, 2014. Society” under sub-classification No. 7-(b)- -Co-partnership Housing Society, in terms of Rule ______8 of Goa Co-operative Societies Rules, 2003. Sd/- (A. K. N. Desai), Asstt. Registrar of Co-op. Notification Societies (South Zone). No. 5-1591-2014/ARSZ/HSG Margao, 17th December, 2014. In exercise of the powers vested in me under ———‹‹‹——— Section 8 of the Goa Co-operative Societies Act, Department of Finance 2001, “The Prime Elite Co-operative Housing Revenue & Control Division Maintenance Society Ltd., Behind Urvashi __ Hotel, Pixem Dongrim, Vasco-da-Gama, Goa”, is Order registered under code symbol No. HSG-(d)-947/ No. 3/1/2009-Fin(R&C) /South-Goa/2014. In exercise of the powers conferred by Sd/- (A. K. N. Desai), Asstt. Registrar of Co-op. sub-section (3) of Section 5 of the Goa Societies (South Zone). Entertainment Tax Act, 1964 (Act No. 2 of 1964), Margao, 17th December, 2014. the Government of Goa is pleased to exempt the mega drama “VANDE MATARAM” from the Certificate of Registration liability of payment of entertainment tax in whole, to be staged at Goa College of Engineering ground, “The Prime Elite Co-operative Housing Farmagudi Goa for a period from 19th February, Maintenance Society Ltd., Behind Urvashi 2015 to 26th February, 2015. Hotel, Pixem Dongrim, Vasco-da-Gama, Goa”, has been registered on 17-12-2014 and it bears By order and in the name of the Governor registration code symbol No. HSG-(d)-947/South- of Goa. -Goa/2014 and it is classified as “Housing Ajit S. Pawaskar, Under Secretary, Fin. (R&C). Society” under sub-classification No. 7-(d)-Co- Porvorim, 25th February, 2015.

1018 OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA SERIES II No. 48 26TH FEBRUARY, 2015 Department of Labour “(1) Whether the following demands served on __ the management of M/s. Auto Service, Vasco-da-Gama, Goa by Gomantak Mazdoor Notification Sangh on behalf of the workmen, vide their No. 28/1/2014-Lab/Part-I/46 letter dated 10-1-2002, are legal and justified? The following award passed by the Industrial Tribunal and Labour Court, at Panaji-Goa on Demand No.1: Pay Scales 12-08-2014 in reference No. IT/8/04 is hereby Grade I : 1000-60-1300-70-1650-80-2050-90-2500- published as required by Section 17 of the -95-2975. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Central Act 14 of 1947). Grade II : 1100-65-1425-75-1800-85-2225-95-2780- -100-3200. By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa. Grade III : 1200-70-1550-80-1960-90-2400-100- -2900-105-3425. Shashank V. Thakur, Under Secretary (Labour). Grade IV : 1300-75-1700-85-2125-95-2600-105- Porvorim, 27th January, 2015. -3125-110-3675. ______Grade V : 1500-80-1900-90-2350-100-2850-110- IN THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL -3400-120-4000. LABOUR COURT Grade VI : 1600-85-2025-95-2500-105-3025-115- GOVERNMENT OF GOA -3600-125-4275. AT PANAJI Demand No. 2: Flat Rise (Before Ms. Bimba K. Thaly, Presiding Officer) Union demands that all the workmen shall be Ref. No. IT/8/04 given the flat rise at the rate of Rs. 500/-. The above amounts should be added to the existing Workmen basic and thereafter fitted in the revised pay scale Rep. by Gomantak Mazdoor Sangh, in the higher stage. Shetye Sankul, Demand No. 3: Service Allowance 3rd Floor, Tisk, Ponda, Goa … Workmen/Party I Union demands that the workmen should be given service allowance as mentioned below: V/s Service upto 3 years : One increment. M/s Auto Service, Service from 3 years Two increments. Joshi Building, to 5 years : Post Box. No. 39, Service from 5 years : Three increments. Vasco-da-Gama, Goa … Employer/Party II to 7 years Service from 7 years : Four increments. Workmen/Party I represented by Shri P. Gaonkar. to 12 years Employer/Party II represented by Adv. Shri P. J. Service from 12 years : Five increments. Kamat. to 17 years Service from 17 years : Six increments. AWARD to 25 years (Passed on this 12th day of August, 2014) Service above 25 years : Seven increments. 1.By order dated 7-10-03 bearing No. 28/42/2003- Demand No. 4: Fixed Dearness Allowance/ -LAB and by Corrigendum dated 30-7-04 bearing /Variable Dearness Allowance No. 28/42/2003-LAB/500 the Government of Goa in Union demands that the present rate of Fixed exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of Dearness Allowance is very less and hence the sub-section 1 of Section 10 of The Industrial same should be revised at the rate of 1200/beyond Disputes Act, 1947 (for short The Act) has referred 1900 points (1960=100) and Variable Dearness the following dispute for adjudication. Allowance shall be paid at the revised rate of

1019 OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA SERIES II No. 48 26TH FEBRUARY, 2015 Rs. 2/- per point rise beyond 2000 points 2. Upon receipt of the reference, a case was (1960=100) and present amount of Variable registered under No. IT/8/04 and registered AD Dearness Allowance should be added to the above notices were issued to both the parties and upon fixed Dearness Allowance, the computation of service, Party I filed the claim statement at Exb. 3 Variable Dearness Allowance shall be made and Party II filed the written statement at Exb. 4. quarterly based on the average consumer price Party I then filed the rejoinder at Exb. 5. index of preceding quarter. 3. In the claim statement it is in short the case Demand No. 5: House Rent Allowance of Party I that the earlier settlement signed between the parties expired on 31-3-01 and thereafter the Union demands that House Rent Allowance union submitted the present charter of demands should be paid at the revised rate of 20% of Basic (COD) and as Party II did not take any positive and Dearness Allowance, as the cost of steps to resolve the issue of COD, Asst. Labour accommodation is very high in Goa due to Tourist Commissioner was requested for intervention but state. the matter ended in failure. Party I has reiterated Demand No. 6: Paid Holidays the demands mentioned in the terms of reference, in the claim statement and has stated that the Union demands that all the workmen shall be existing pay scales of the Party I workmen are very granted paid holidays at the rate of 15 days per low; that Party II is well established in its line of year. business and its financial position is extremely Demand No. 8: Leave sound; that the annual increments provided in the existing scales of pay are equally low; and therefore Union demands that all the workers should be flat rise of Rs. 500/- is fair and reasonable. Party I given leave on following basis:- has also stated that seniority increments are (A) Earned Leave: That all the workmen should justified as there is very small difference between be given Earned leave at the rate 30 days Earned basic pay of senior workers and junior workers. Leave per year with accumulation upto 100 days Party I has stated that the quantum of dearness and Leave shall be allowed to be taken 10 times allowance paid to the workmen is highly in a year. inadequate and is paid at much lower rate than what is available to the workmen elsewhere and it (B) Casual Leave: That all the workmen should does not neutralize even half of the rise in prices. be given casual leave at the rate of 12 days per Thus, according to Party I the demand for revision year. in dearness allowance is just, fair and proper. C) Sick Leave: That all the workmen should Party I has stated that the cost of accommodation be given Sick Leave at the rate of 12 days per is very high in Goa and hence the demand for year, as the ESIC does not give sick leave for first house rent allowance and as regards paid holidays two days of sickness. it is the case of Party I that other similar establishments in the region are granting higher Demand No. 9: Travelling Allowance paid holidays as Goa is full of festivals and to Union demands that those workmen who have celebrate them most of the industrial not been provided with housing accommodation establishments grant their workers the festival shall be paid TA at the rate of Rs. 200/- per month. holidays. Party I has stated that as the workers Demand No. 10. Canteen Allowance need rest after working hard in order to maintain their health, their demand for increase in the leave Union demands that all the workmen should is just and proper. Party I has stated that the be paid canteen subsidy at the rate of Rs.150/- per workmen who are not provided with transport month. facility shall be paid travelling allowance as the Demand No.11. Supply of Raincoats/Umbrella cost of transport is very high and public transport is not adequately available. Party I has stated Union demands that all the workmen should that the cost of food articles in the market is very be given Raincoats/Umbrella once in a year. high and there is no canteen facility and therefore Union reserve the right to amend, add, delete the demand for canteen allowance. Party I has any demands during the time of negotiation. stated that it is well established practice of supplying raincoats/umbrellas to the workers once (2) If not, what relief the workmen are entitled in a year to protect them from rains and hence the to?” demand for supply of raincoats/umbrellas and

1020 OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA SERIES II No. 48 26TH FEBRUARY, 2015 safety shoes. Party I has therefore prayed to 5. In the rejoinder at Exb. 5 Party I has denied declare that their demands are genuine, fair and the contentions raised by Party II in the written reasonable and to grant the demands from the day statement and has asserted its case set up in the of the expiry of the earlier settlement. claim statement. 4. In the written statement Party II has denied 6. Based on the pleadings of both the parties, the case of Party I and has stated that it is engaged issues were framed on 15-6-04 (Exb. 6). in the trading and repair business of the two, three 7. In support of their case Party I examined Shri and four wheelers and owns petrol pumps; that P. Gaonkar whereas Party II examined Shri Paresh their business affected considerably as the Joshi in support of their defence. Principals i.e. manufacturers did not change their product as required for competitive market and 8. Heard learned representative Shri P. Gaonkar also because new vehicles were introduced in the for Party I and learned Adv. Shri P. J. Kamat for market so also road side mechanics came into Party II. Both the parties have also filed the written existence and as these mechanics had no submissions. overheads, their charges were lower than Party II 9.In his arguments ld. representative of Party I and hence customers started getting their vehicles submitted that no annual increments were given repaired through them which affected the business to the workmen and therefore the wages were of Party II. It is stated that around the year 2000/ stagnant. He stated that Party I has claimed an /2001, their marketing area was restricted by its additional amount of Rs. 2500/- per month per Principal i.e. Bajaj Auto Limited to Marmagoa workmen and this amount deserves to be paid District only, which affected their business and considering the rise in the cost of living. By that sale of Ambassador cars went down referring to the documents pertaining to Balance considerably so also the allotment of new petrol sheets and profit and loss account, he stated that pump in the nearby vicinity on the same road had the losses are shown after depreciation and that also reduced the business of petrol pumps to half. Party II runs in profit. As regards comparison with It is the contention of Party II that the revision of the similar establishments he has stated that he salaries and other benefits of the workmen are has produced the settlements between dependent on the existing financial position as M/s. Chowgule Industries and their workmen and well as expected business and considering the fact M/s. Narciva Naik and their workmen who have of introduction of new competitive vehicles in the been paying higher wages. In support of his market and the road side mechanics Party II will submissions he relied on the judgments in the case have no better business for the sale and repairs of of Crown Aluminum Works v/s Their Workmen 1958-I- LLJ-1, The Workmen v/s Reptokos Brett the vehicles dealt by them and therefore they are & Co. and another 1992–LLR-I, Shivraj Fine Art not in a position to take any additional financial Lithoworks v/s State Industrial Court 1978 I-LLJ- burden. It is stated that after the submission of -532 & Transport Corporation of India v/s Raja COD by the union Party II examined its financial Mathardi Transport & General Kamgar Union position and orally conveyed the said fact to the 2002–III LLJ–385. union and volunteered to give revision in the permissible limits by explaining all the facts but 10. On the other hand Ld adv. for Party II argued the union did not agree and took up the matter that COD has been raised on behalf of workmen before Asst. Labour Commissioner, Vasco da Gama from service department of Party II; that the for intervention. It is stated that in the meantime demands raised are unreasonable and unjustified majority of the workmen of Party I approached as the service department runs in loss; that the Party II and requested to revise the wages and financial position of Party II is bad and therefore other benefits within the permissible limits of the wage revision which depends upon the Party II and accordingly Party II offered them financial position of the company as well as upon revision of wages and other benefits but only 24 comparison with wages paid by the comparable out of 40 workmen accepted the said offer and concerns, cannot be granted. In support of his were paid the arrears as from 1-4-2002. It is stated above submissions Ld. Adv. for Party II relied that the letter dated 10-1-02 of Party I union on the judgment in the case of Concept enclosing therein the COD does not give any Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Aurangabad v/s Concept justification or reasons for revision demanded for. Pharmaceuticals Kamgar Sanghatana 2005 II CLR Thus, amongst above and other grounds, Party II 337 and in the case of Mathura Prasad Srivastava has stated that Party I is not entitled to the reliefs and others v/s Saugor Electric Supply Co. Ltd claimed. and another Civil Appeals No.703-706/1964 (SC).

1021 OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA SERIES II No. 48 26TH FEBRUARY, 2015 11. I have gone through the records of the case in pay scales elsewhere. He has stated that and have duly considered the case advanced by demands for seniority increments are reasonable both the parties. I am reproducing herewith the and that the existing rate of dearness allowance is issues along with their findings and reasons highly inadequate and required to be increased. It thereof. may be mentioned here that in his arguments Shri P. Gaonkar made it clear that Party I was not Sr. Issues Findings pressing for demand No.5 to demand No.11 No. pertaining to House Rent Allowance, Paid Holidays, 1. Whether the Party I union In the negative. Leave Travelling Allowance, Canteen Allowance proves that the demands and Supply of Raincoats and Umbrella. Shri P. raised by it on behalf of the Gaonkar has placed on record settlement dated workmen against the Party II 17-11-2000 between M/s. Chowgule Industries and vide letter dated 10-1-2002 their workmen, settlement dated 28-6-99 between are legal and justified? M/s. Narciva Naik and their workmen to show the comparison between the wages and the minimum 2. Whether the Party II proves Does not wage notification No. 24/21/2009-LAB(15) and that the reference made by survive. settlement dated 4-3-98 between Party II and its the Government is not workmen to emphasize that wages paid by Party II maintainable because there are below minimum, at Exb.20 to Exb. 23 is no establishment by name respectively. Goa Auto Services? 14. In his cross examination Shri P. Gaonkar was 3. Whether the workmen are In the negative. shown notification dated 29-10-98 in respect of entitled to any relief ? Automobile repairing workshop and he has 4. What Award? As per order admitted that this notification was issued by below. Government of Goa and it prescribes minimum wages for the workers in different categories from REASONS 23-10-98. It is marked as Exb. 24. Shri P. Gaonkar has also admitted that the minimum wages were 12. Issue No.1: Undoubtedly, the settlement revised w.e.f. 1-7-03 vide notification dated 27-6-03 dated 4-3-98 executed between Party I and Party II and the same is marked as Exb. 25. Shri P. Gaonkar expired on 31-3-01 and since then there has been has further admitted that Exb. 25 was issued by no wage settlement executed between the parties. Government of Goa and it prescribes minimum Though, in the claim statement it is averred that wages for workers in different categories from upon expiry of above settlement, the union vide 1-7-03. He has also stated that he did not go through their letter dated 19-10-01 submitted the present the profit and loss and balance sheet of Party II COD, in the written statement it is the case of before submitting the charter of demands and that Party II that on 21-1-02 they received a letter dated he had made the demand on considering the work 10-1-02 of the Gomantak Mazdoor Sangh (GMS) rendered by the workmen. He has admitted that enclosing the COD. Even for that matter, in his he did not consider the financial position of cross examination by the Ld. advocate for the Party II to make the said demands and this is Party II, Shri Puti Gaonkar, has admitted that the because according to him by virtue of services demands were raised by Party I vide letter dated rendered by the workmen, the Party II was making 10-1-02. Thus, it is apparent that the COD was profit. This witness was shown balance sheet submitted by Party I vide letter dated 10-1-02 and dated 31-3-03 along with profit and loss account not by letter dt.19-10-01. It is otherwise not in for the year ended 31-3-03, balance sheet dated dispute that Party II did not accept the said COD 31-3-05 along with profit and loss account for the and as such the matter went before the ALC but year ended 31-3-05; balance sheet dated 31-3-07 with no positive results. along with profit and loss account for the year 13. In his evidence Shri Puti Gaonkar has stated ended 31-3-07 and has admitted the same. The that the existing pay scales are very low and cannot same are marked as Exb. 26 colly, Exb. 27 colly be compared with even a small industrial and Exb. 28 colly respectively. establishment where the pay scales are higher than 15. As regards the settlements at Exbts. 20 and that of Party II. Shri Puti Gaonkar has also stated 21 respectively Shri P. Gaonkar has stated that he that the annual increments provided in the existing does not know as to what was the turnover of scales are low compared to the increments provided Chowgule Industries Ltd., at the time of signing of

1022 OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA SERIES II No. 48 26TH FEBRUARY, 2015 Exb. 20 as well as the turn over of M/s. Narciva 18. As regards the judicial pronouncements Naik at the time of signing Exb.21. He has also relied upon by the Ld. Representative of Party I, stated that he does not know what were the profits the judgment in the case of Crown Alluminum of these two establishments at the time of signing (supra) indicates that an industry has to pay its of the above settlements. workmen at least a bare minimum wage or else the 16. Shri Paresh Joshi the MD of Party II has in company cannot exist. short stated that Party II who was trading in 19. The judgment in the case of The Workmen vehicles due to various reasons mentioned in his v/s Reptokos Brett (supra) explains what is affidavit such as not changing of their product by minimum wage and states that the management their Principals as required for competitive market, can revise the wage structure to the prejudice of introduction of new make vehicles in the market the workmen in a case where due to financial and coming into existence of roadside mechanics, stringency it is unable to bear the burden of the lost their business considerably and as such the existing wage but in an industry where the wage turnover of Party II went down affecting their structure is at the level of minimum wage no profits. He has stated that the revision of salaries revision in wage structure is permissible even on and other benefits of the workmen are dependent the ground of financial stringency. on the existing financial position as well as the 20. The observations in the case of Shivraj Fine expected business and while examining the Arts (supra) speak as to how the financial capacity financial position of the establishment it has to be of the employer is to be determined. In this seen as to what has been the progress of the judgment reference is made to various other industry in question, what are the prospects of the judgments including that of Williamsons (India) industry in future, has the industry been making Pvt. Ltd. v/s the Workmen, 1962 I LLJ 302 and profits and if as to what extent etc. He has stated the case of the Workmen of Balmer Lawrie & Co. that for the financial year 2001/2002 to 2004/2005 v/s Balmer Lawrie & Co. 1964 I LLJ 380 to indicate Party II had suffered losses throughout and also as to what factors are to be considered for the Service Department, the workers from which comparing one concern with the other. It is also have raised the present dispute was running in observed that so far as minimum wage is loss. He has stated that his unit cannot be concerned it is to be fixed without any reference compared with that of M/s. Chowgule Industries to the paying capacity of the industry. and M/s. Narciva Naik as they deal in the latest models of four wheelers and six wheelers who are 21. In the judgment in the case of Transport in demand and their turnover is in crores. Finally Corporation of India (supra) it is held that the he has stated that Party II is not in a position to burden of proof to show that he has no financial give any further increase than what was offered to capacity to withstand the burden would be on the the union and accepted by other workers. He has employer as it is he who knows his financial produced the statement of gross salary paid to position. This judgment also states that the service department staff from April 2003 to March Tribunal has power to even grant the demand more 2008 at Exb.30 and year-wise comparative than claimed. information on poor performance of the firm and 22. The judgment in the case of M/s. Unichem downfall in sales from 2002-03 to 2006-07. Laboratories Ltd. (supra) indicate that provision for depreciation and other reserves cannot be 17. In his cross examination this witness has deducted in computing profits. stated that he does not get any commission from the company towards the sale of the vehicles and 23. Coming to the judicial pronouncements relied what he gets is the difference in price for which he upon by the Ld. Advocate for Party II, the buys the vehicle from the company and sells it to observations in the judgment in the case of Concept the customers. He has stated that they get profit Pharmaceuticals (supra), make it clear that there has to be evidence as to industry-cum-region margin towards sale of spare parts and that the formula justifying revision and there has to be customer is charged towards spare parts of the finding that the industry can bear the additional vehicle except when the vehicle is in the warranty burden. The judgment in the case of Express period. He has denied the suggestion that the Newspaper v/s Union of India and others 1961 I demands raised by the workers were legal and LLJ 339 has been relied upon in the above case justified and the same were not accepted by the and the principles culled out from this judgment company only to put a break in the union. are as under:

1023 OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA SERIES II No. 48 26TH FEBRUARY, 2015 “(1) that in the fixation of rates of wages Exb. 28 colly for the years 2001/2002 to 2004/2005 which include within its compass the fixation reveals that the gross profit made by Party II before of scales of wages also, the capacity of the depreciation and taxation for the year 2001/2002 is industry to pay is one of the essential Rs. 26,301.91, for the year 2002/2003 is Rs. 90,654.89, circumstances to be taken into consideration for the year 2003/2004 is Rs. 55,029.63 and for the except in cases of bare subsistence or minimum year 2004/2005 is Rs. 77,095.48. wage where the employer is bound to pay the 27. I have already pointed out supra that on the same irrespective of such capacity; basis of demands made by Party I the total increase (2) that the capacity of the industry to pay is per annum for 18 workers for the first year ranges to be considered on an industry-cum-region between Rs. 4,74,120 to Rs. 6,11,064 and the same basis after taking a fair cross-section of the would increase per year. Thus comparing this figure industry; and with the gross profits made by Party II as envisaged (3) that the proper measure for gauging the in Exb. 26 colly to Exb. 28 colly which is pointed capacity of the industry to pay should take into out in the above para, it becomes clear that the account the elasticity of demand for the financial position of Party II is not that sound as to product, the possibility of tightening up the bear the burden of increase in wages. Thus, the organization so that the industry could pay observations in the judgment in the cases of higher wages without difficulty and the Concept Pharmaceuticals Ltd., and Mathura possibility of increase in the efficiency of the Prasad Srivastava (both cited supra) squarely lowest paid workers resulting in increase in apply to the case in hand. production considered in conjunction with the 28. Even for that matter, it can also be made out elasticity of demand for the product –no doubt from the profit and loss account documents from against the ultimate background that the Exb.26 colly to Exb.28 colly that service department burden of the increased rate should not be such of Party II runs in loss and this is because the as to drive the employer out of business”. present charter of demands are raised mainly by 24. In the judgment in the case of Mathura the employees of the Service Department. As per Prasad Srivastava (supra) the principle culled out Exb. 26 colly to Exb. 28 colly the expenses and while considering the question regarding revision losses for the Service Department for the years 2001/ of wages is that the financial position of the /2002 to 2004/2005, of Party II are as follows: company needs to be taken into account while Year Income Expenses Loss revising the wages and if the company has no financial capacity to bear the increase in wages, 2001-2002 10,99,329.67 14,65,962.18 - 3,66,632.51 such request by the workmen needs to be 2002-20031 1,20,144.92 13,73,380.28 - 2,53,235.36 rejected. 2003-2004 9,49,629.03 11,53,479.02 - 2,03,849.99 2004-2005 10,95,639.30 11,89,356.61 - 93,717.31 25. As rightly pointed out by the ld. advocate for Party II, it can be made out that the total 29. Being so, the total loss from the Service increase demanded by the union vide the present Department for the years from 2001/2002 to the COD is between 4,74,120 to 6,11,064 per annum for year 2004/2005 was Rs. 9,17,435.17. Even for that 18 workers for the first year and thereafter there matter, if the total income and expenditures and would be an increase @Rs. 96,120 per year on profit and loss account of Party II is considered as account of incremental scale, VDA and HRA. It is a whole, then even in such a case it is apparent the contention of Party II that after the year 1998-99 that Party II has made meagre profits before the business activities of Party II were affected depreciation and taxation and therefore in such and its turn over came down and this position is event the request of Party I of revision in wages not seriously disputed by Party I. cannot be allowed. 26. As laid down in the judgment in the case 30. Ld. Representative of Party I by relying on of M/s. Unichem Laboratories Ltd. (supra) provision the judgment in the case of Kamani Metals and for taxation and for reserves cannot take Alloys v/s Their Workmen (1967) 2 S.C.R. 463 precedence over fixation of wages and therefore contended that the mere fact that there is an the financial position of Party II before depreciation increase in the Consumer Price Index, justifies an and taxation needs to be considered to find out upward revision. I have gone through this the financial status of Party II. Perusal of profit and judgment and have noted that the above loss account Exb. 26 colly, Exb. 27 colly and observations have been made in the light of the

1024 OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA SERIES II No. 48 26TH FEBRUARY, 2015 submissions of the employer that there is no change 34. In order to substantiate the above stand of circumstances justifying a revision of wages Shri P. Gaonkar has produced at Exb. 22 the and pay scales or dearness allowance. In the instant minimum wage notification No. 24/21/2009-LAB/ case the main defense of Party II is that it has no (15) at Exb. 22, pertaining to categories of employees financial capacity to bear the burden of revised employed in various grades in the scheduled wages and in such situation, strictly speaking, the employment, namely, “employment in Automobile above observations cannot be made applicable to Repairing Workshops and Garages”. It may be the fact situation in hand. mentioned that Exb. 22 is of the year 2009 where as the demands in hand have been raised in the 31. In his written arguments Ld. Representative year 2002. Nonetheless, in his cross examination of Party I has referred to the judgment in the case Shri P. Gaonkar has admitted that the notification of Hindustan Antibiotics Ltd. v/s Workmen (1967) dated 29-10-98 (Exb.24) prescribes minimum wages 1 SCR 652 to explain the object of wage fixation as in different categories as from 23-10-98 and Exb. 25 well as its purpose. I have gone through this is the notification revising the minimum wages judgment in which reference has been made to w.e.f. 1-7-03. Thus, the notification for the purpose various other judgments of the Hon’ble Apex Court of minimum wages to be considered in this case to explain the laudable aim of industrial policy. has to be Exb.24 colly. In terms of Exb. 24 colly the There cannot be any dispute over the propositions/ minimum wage for engine mechanic is Rs. 67/- per /observations made in this judgment but in the day or Rs. 402/- per week or Rs.1742/- per month. situation like the one in hand, where Party II has It also cannot be disputed that the monthly rate of established that it has no financial capacity to minimum wages payable to an employee employed bear the burden of revised wages, the observations in any category in respect of which daily rate of in these judgments cannot be pressed into services. minimum wages is revised shall be computed by 32. The judgment in the case of Shivraj Fine multiplying the daily rate by 26. Arts (supra) relied upon by the Ld. Representative 35. Apparently, the statement of gross salary of Party I speaks about the factors which determine paid to Service Department staff of Party II from the capacity of the employer and the same are the April 2003 to March 2008 is produced by the productivity of the labour; the prevailing rates of witness of Party II at Exb. 30. Reading of Exb. 30 wages in the same and similar industries in the gives clear indication that the wages of almost all same or neighbouring localities; the present the employees from the Service Department are economic position of the industry and the prospects much above the minimum wages as prescribed in in the near future etc. No positive evidence on the the notification at Exb. 24 colly which was above subjects is on record and on the contrary published as on 29-10-98. Thus, the observations in Party II has established that its economic position the judgments in the cases of Crown Alluminium is not sound enough to bear the burden of revised and Reptakos Brett (both cited supra) which are wages. Being so, the observations in this judgment on the subject matter of minimum wage, are of no too are of no assistance to Party I to advance its assistance to Party I to support their submissions. case. This being the situation, irrespective of the fact 33. Now coming to the aspect of minimum wage, that in the reference in hand this court is not it cannot be disputed that the bare minimum or required to adjudicate upon the issue as to whether subsistence wage would have to be fixed Party II has been paying minimum wages or not, it irrespective of the capacity of the industry to pay is clear that the wages paid to the employees as observed in the judgment in the case of Crown from the Service Department by Party II are much Alluminium (supra). It may be mentioned here that above the minimum wage prescribed by the notification at Exb. 24 colly. in the charter of demands raised by Party I it is nowhere their specific case that Party II is not 36. It is also the contention of Shri P. Gaonkar paying the minimum wages to the workers. It that while fixing the wages the Tribunal has firstly cannot be disputed that the question which is not to compare within the “industry” and if such raised in the reference cannot be considered employers are not there then it can take any employer within the region. He further stated that indirectly while deciding the reference. while fixing a wage structure the Tribunal is bound Nevertheless, in the claim statement it is pleaded to apply the principle of region-cum-industry that bare minimum wage is subsistence wage and among same or similar industries. It deserves to be that considering this aspect the demand of the noted that in terms of above principle of law and union is justified. to show the comparison of wages Party I has 1025 OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA SERIES II No. 48 26TH FEBRUARY, 2015 produced the settlements at Exb. 20 and Exb. 21 39. Thus, in the light of above discussion I am of which are between M/s. Chowgule Industries and the considered opinion that Party I has failed to their workmen and M/s. Narciva Naik and their prove issue No.1 and hence my findings. workmen respectively. It is worthwhile nothing 40. Issue No. 2: Undoubtedly, vide corrigendum that in his cross examination Shri P. Gaonkar has dated 30-7-04, the Government of Goa has corrected admitted in clear terms that he does not know as the name of the employer in the reference from to what was the turnover of Chowgule Industries “M/s. Goa Auto Service” to “M/s. Auto Service” and Ltd., so also as that of M/s. Narciva Naik at the accordingly necessary correction has been made time of signing of the settlements at Exb. 20 and in the reference. Thus, nothing remains to be 21 respectively. He has further stated that he does decided in this issue and hence my findings. not know as to what were the profits of these two establishments at the time of signing of the above 41. Issue No. 3: In view of discussion supra, settlements. It may be mentioned here that in his the workmen are not entitled to any relief. written arguments Shri P. Gaonkar has shown a 42. In the result, I pass the following comparison between the wages paid by the above two establishments viz a viz the wages paid by ORDER Party II but it deserves to be noted that nothing of 1. It is hereby held that all the demands served the above sort has been deposed by Shri P. Gaonkar on the management of M/s. Auto Service, before the court on oath and therefore there was Vasco-da-Gama, Goa, by Gomantak Mazdoor no occasion for Party II to cross examine Shri P. Sangh on behalf of the workmen, vide their Gaonkar on the above subject matter i.e. the letter dated 10-1-2002, are illegal and comparison highlighted in the written arguments. unjustified. 37. Even otherwise, it cannot be disputed that 2. Party I/workman are therefore not entitled to for the purpose of comparison between two any relief. concerns what is required to be looked into is the capital invested by them, the profits made by them, 3. No order as to costs. the nature of the business carried on by them, Inform the Government accordingly. their standing, the strength of their labour force as well as the prospects about the future of their Sd/- business as observed in the judgment in the case (B. K. Thaly) of Williamsons (supra). It also cannot be disputed Presiding Officer, that in determining the question whether one Industrial Tribunal concern is comparable with another in the matter cum-Labour Court of fixing wages the total capital invested by the concern, the extent of its business, the order of ———‹‹‹——— the projects made by the concern, the dividends Department of Law & Judiciary paid, the number of employees employed in the Law (Establishment) Division concern and the standing in the industry to which __ it belongs have to be examined as observed in the judgment in the case of Balmer Lawrie (supra). Certificate of Practice 38. Party I has failed to show the comparison in No. 9-18-2004-LD(Estt) Part-II(VIII)/299 the above manner by making the required In partial modification of Certificate of Practice statements on oath before the court and therefore dated 20-07-2010 issued under the provisions of in such situation it would not stand to reason to Notaries Act, 1952 (Central Act 53 of 1952) and say that the settlements at Exb. 20 and 21 could be the Notaries Rules, 1956 made thereunder, looked into for the purpose of comparing the wages Government of Goa is pleased to extend the area paid by the above establishments with that of the of practice as a Notary of Smt. Rupa Amitkumar wages paid by the Party II. Even otherwise, it is Dublay, to Tiswadi Taluka, under Rule 8A of the apparent from the evidence on record that Party II Notaries Rules, 1956, with immediate effect. is trading in the vehicles and they do not deal in By order and in the name of the Governor the latest models of four wheelers and six wheelers of Goa. like the above two establishments, and thus even for this reason the said two establishments cannot Amul S. Gaunker, Under Secretary (Estt.). be termed as comparable concerns. Porvorim, 17th February, 2015.

1026 OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA SERIES II No. 48 26TH FEBRUARY, 2015 Certificate of Practice Certificate of Practice No. 9-18-2004-LD(Estt) Part-II(217)/300 No. 9-18-2004-LD(Estt) Part-II(XI)/303 In partial modification of Certificate of Practice In partial modification of Certificate of Practice dated 29-01-2010 issued under the provisions of dated 20-07-2010 issued under the provisions of Notaries Act, 1952 (Central Act 53 of 1952) and Notaries Act, 1952 (Central Act 53 of 1952) and the Notaries Rules, 1956 made thereunder, the Notaries Rules, 1956 made thereunder, Government of Goa is pleased to extend the area Government of Goa is pleased to extend the area of practice as a Notary of Smt. Maria Agnela of practice as a Notary of Smt. Harsha R. Naik, to Honorina Araujo, to the entire State of Goa, under Mormugao Taluka, under Rule 8A of the Notaries Rule 8A of the Notaries Rules, 1956, with Rules, 1956, with immediate effect. immediate effect. By order and in the name of the Governor By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa. of Goa. Amul S. Gaunker, Under Secretary (Estt.). Amul S. Gaunker, Under Secretary (Estt.). Porvorim, 17th February, 2015. Porvorim, 17th February, 2015. ______Certificate of Practice Certificate of Practice No. 9-18-2004-LD(Estt) Part-II(216)/304 No. 9-18-2004-LD(Estt) Part-II(215)/301 In partial modification of Certificate of Practice In partial modification of Certificate of Practice dated 29-01-2010 issued under the provisions of dated 29-01-2010 issued under the provisions of Notaries Act, 1952 (Central Act 53 of 1952) and Notaries Act, 1952 (Central Act 53 of 1952) and the Notaries Rules, 1956 made thereunder, the Notaries Rules, 1956 made thereunder, Government of Goa is pleased to extend the area Government of Goa is pleased to extend the area of practice as a Notary of Shri Surajkumar N. Naik, of practice as a Notary of Shri Rajkumar N. Naik, to the entire State of Goa, under Rule 8A of the to the entire State of Goa, under Rule 8A of the Notaries Rules, 1956, with immediate effect. Notaries Rules, 1956, with immediate effect. By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa. By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa. Amul S. Gaunker, Under Secretary (Estt.). Amul S. Gaunker, Under Secretary (Estt.). Porvorim, 17th February, 2015. Porvorim, 17th February, 2015. ———‹——— ______Notification by the High Court of Judicature Appellate Side, Bombay Certificate of Practice No. PL.B.1524/2014 No. 5-40-2000-LD(Estt)/302 Smt. Andreza Rodrigues e Pereira, Personal In partial modification of Certificate of Practice Assistant, High Court of Bombay at Goa, Panaji, is dated 12-10-2000 issued under the provisions of hereby promoted and appointed to officiate as Notaries Act, 1952 (Central Act 53 of 1952) and Private Secretary, on the establishment of the High the Notaries Rules, 1956 made thereunder, Court of Bombay at Goa, Panaji, in Pay Band of Government of Goa is pleased to extend the area Rs. 15,600-39,100 and Grade Pay of Rs. 6,600/- with of practice as a Notary of Shri Subhash Pundalik effect from the date she assumes charge of the Sawant, to the entire State of Goa, under Rule 8A said post. of the Notaries Rules, 1956, with immediate effect. By order and in the name of the Hon’ble the By order and in the name of the Governor Chief Justice. of Goa. High Court of Judicature at Dr. Mrs. Shalini Amul S. Gaunker, Under Secretary (Estt.). Bombay, 23rd December, 2014 Phansalkar-Joshi Porvorim, 17th February, 2015. Registrar General

1027 OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA SERIES II No. 48 26TH FEBRUARY, 2015 Department of Personnel Order __ No. 15/1/99-PER(Part-2)484 Order Smt. Isha M. Sawant, Jt. Mamlatdar-I, Bardez shall No. 6/5/2011-PER/488 hold the charge of Jt. Mamlatdar-II, Pernem in On the recommendations of Goa Services Board addition to her own duties. Smt. Sawant shall and with the approval of the Government, Smt. discharge her duty as Jt. Mamlatdar-II, Pernem on Shabri Manjrekar @ Smt. Ruhi Redkar, Tuesday and Thursday and remaining days of Secretary, Goa Konkani Academy is hereby the week she shall discharge her duty as transferred and posted as Additional Director of Jt. Mamlatdar-I, Bardez with immediate effect, in Vigilance, with immediate effect, in public interest. public interest. This issues with the concurrence of the Office Smt. Redkar shall hold charge of the post of of the Joint Chief Electoral Officer vide their letter Secretary, Goa Konkani Academy, in addition to No. 5/10/2015/ELEC/5440 dated 07-02-2015. her duties and until further orders. By order and in the name of the Governor of This issues with the concurrence of the Office of Goa. the Joint Chief Electoral Officer vide their letter Umeshchandra L. Joshi, Under Secretary No. 5/10/2015/ELEC/5392 dated 05-02-2015. (Personnel-I). By order and in the name of the Governor of Porvorim, 9th January, 2015. Goa. ______Umeshchandra L. Joshi, Under Secretary (Personnel-I). Order No. 7/30/2014-PER Porvorim, 9th February, 2015. ______The Governor of Goa is pleased to order the allocation of work/Departments amongst the officers Order as follows with immediate effect, until further No. 7/30/2014-PER orders:-

On the recommendations of Goa Services Board Sr. Name & Designation Department allotted and with the approval of the Government, the No. transfers of the following officers are ordered with immediate effect, in public interest:- 1. Shri Mohan Lal, IAS, Resident Commissioner, (2002) Goa Sadan. Sr. Name of the Officer and Transferred as No. Designation 2. Shri Ameya Abhyankar,1. Director, Tourism. IAS (2007) 2. Special Secretary 1. Shri Nilesh B. Fal Managing Director, Info (Finance-Budget). Desai, Tech Corporation of 3. Additional Secretary Director (IT) Goa Ltd. (Health). 4. Director, PPP Cell. 2. Shri Elvis P. Gomes, Inspector General Director Municipal of Prisons. 3. Shri Sachin Shinde, 1. Collector (South). Administration IAS (2008) 3. Shri Venancio Furtado, Director Municipal Collector (South) Administration. By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa. All the above officers shall complete the process Yetindra M. Maralkar, Additional Secretary of handing over/taking over within 7 days from (Personnel). the date of issue of order and submit compliance. Porvorim, 6th February, 2015. ______By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa. Order Yetindra M. Maralkar, Additional Secretary No. 6/2/2005-PER/564 (Personnel). On recommendation of the Goa Services Board Porvorim, 6th February, 2015. and approval of the Government, Smt. Sneha

1028 OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA SERIES II No. 48 26TH FEBRUARY, 2015 Morajkar, Dy. Director (Admn.), GMC holding And whereas, the Government of Goa, additional charge of Dy. Director-II, GMC is considered the report made by the Collector under transferred and posted as Under Secretary to Chief sub-section (2) of Section 5-A of the said Act and Secretary with immediate effect and in public on being satisfied that the said land is needed for interest. the said public purpose, vide Notification No. Consequently, Shri Sanjeev Gauns Dessai, Dy. 22/31/2013-RD dated 25-06-2014, issued under Collector, Revenue, North shall hold charge of the Section 6 of the said Act, and published in the post of Dy. Director (Admn.), GMC and Dy. Official Gazette, Series II No. 15 dated 10-07-2014, Director-II, GMC in addition to his own duties, declared that the said land is required for the said with immediate effect and in public interest. public purpose. By order and in the name of the Governor Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers of Goa. conferred by Section 7 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (Act 1 of 1894), the Government of Goa Umeshchandra L. Joshi, Under Secretary hereby directs the Collector, South Goa District, (Personnel-I). Margao-Goa to take the order for acquisition of Porvorim, 17th February, 2015. the said land. ———‹‹‹——— By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa. Department of Public Health __ Ashutosh Apte, Under Secretary (Revenue-I). Corrigendum Porvorim, 21st November, 2014. No. 4/14/2003-II/PHD/Part 2/214 ______Read: Order No. 4/14/2003-II/PHD/Part 2 Order dated 05-02-2015. No. 22/33/2013-RD The name appearing at Sr. No. 1 in the Whereas, the Government of Goa, vide Government Order read at preamble shall be Notification No. 22/33/2013-RD dated 21-11-2013, corrected to read as “Dr. Shital Viraj Parab” instead issued under sub-section (1) of Section 4 of the of “Dr. Shital Viraj Parag”. Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (Act 1 of 1894) Rest of the contents remains unchanged. (hereinafter referred to as the “said Act”), and published in the Official Gazette, Series II No. 36 By order and in the name of the Governor of dated 05-12-2013 and Corrigendum No. 22/33/ Goa. /2013-RD dated 11-12-2013 was issued and Sangeeta M. Porob, Under Secretary (Health). published in the Official Gazette Series II No. 38 Porvorim, 9th February, 2015. dated 20-12-2013 notified that the land specified in the Schedule thereof (hereinafter referred to as ———‹‹‹——— the “said land”) is likely to be needed for public Department of Revenue purpose viz. Land Acquisition for development of __ Village School Playground at Goa Velha in Tiswadi Order Taluka (hereinafter referred to as the “said public purpose”); No. 22/31/2013-RD And whereas, the Government of Goa, Whereas, the Government of Goa, vide considered the report made by the Collector under Notification No. 22/31/2013-RD dated 28-11-2013, sub-section (2) of Section 5-A of the said Act and issued under sub-section (1) of Section 4 of the on being satisfied that the said land is needed for Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (Act 1 of 1894) the said public purpose, vide Notification No. (hereinafter referred to as the “said Act”), and 22/33/2013-RD dated 17-10-2014, issued under published in the Official Gazette, Series II No. 36 Section 6 of the said Act, and published in the dated 05-12-2013, notified that the land specified Official Gazette, Series II No. 31 dated 30-10-2014, in the Schedule thereof (hereinafter referred to as declared that the said land is required for the said the “said land”) is likely to be needed for public public purpose. purpose viz. Land Acquisition for segregation of dry waste at Colva in Survey No. 11/6 & 8 of Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers Salcete Taluka (hereinafter referred to as the “said conferred by Section 7 of the Land Acquisition public purpose”); Act, 1894 (Act 1 of 1894), the Government of Goa

1029 OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA SERIES II No. 48 26TH FEBRUARY, 2015 hereby directs the Collector, North Goa District, 27-06-2013 and in two local newspapers, namely Panaji-Goa to take the order for acquisition of the “The Navhind Times” dated 16-06-2013 and said land. “Sunaparant” dated 16-06-2013 & 20-07-2013, it By order and in the name of the Governor was notified under Section 4 of the Land of Goa. Acquisition Act, 1894 (Central Act 1 of 1894) (hereinafter referred to as “the said Act”), that Ashutosh Apte, Under Secretary (Revenue-I). the land specified in the Schedule appended to Porvorim, 19th February, 2015. the said Notification (hereinafter referred to as the ______said land), was needed for public purpose, viz. Land Acquisition for construction of DWC 8R and Order Tail Minor of B2 distributory of RBMC of TIP at No. 22/26/2013-RD Alorna Village of Pernem Taluka. Whereas, the Government of Goa, vide And whereas, the Government of Goa Notification No. 22/26/2013-RD dated 07-10-2013, (hereinafter referred to as “the Government”) after issued under sub-section (1) of Section 4 of the considering the report made under sub-section (2) Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (Act 1 of 1894) of Section 5-A of the said Act is satisfied that the (hereinafter referred to as the “said Act”), and land specified in the Schedule hereto (hereinafter published in the Official Gazette, Series II No. 29 referred to as “the said land”), is needed for the dated 17-10-2013 notified that the land specified public purpose now specified as Land Acquisition in the Schedule thereof (hereinafter referred to as for construction of DWC 8R and Tail Minor of B2 the “said land”) is likely to be needed for public distributory of RBMC of TIP of Water Resources purpose viz. Land Acquisition for stationing one permanent CISF Battalion in Goa at Pernem Department at Alorna Village of Pernem Taluka, Village in Pernem Taluka (hereinafter referred to on dissolution of the Goa Tillari Irrigation as the “said public purpose”); Development Corporation. And whereas, the Government of Goa, Now, therefore, the Government hereby considered the report made by the Collector under declares under the provisions of Section 6 of the sub-section (2) of Section 5-A of the said Act and said Act that the said land is required for the on being satisfied that the said land is needed for public purpose specified above. the said public purpose, vide Notification No. 22/26/2013-RD dated 30-09-2014, issued under The Government also hereby appoints under Section 6 of the said Act, and published in the Clause (c) of Section 3 of the said Act, the Special Official Gazette, Series II No. 28 dated 09-10-2014, Land Acquisition Officer (N), W.R.D., Karaswada, declared that the said land is required for the said Mapusa, Bardez-Goa to perform the functions of public purpose. the Collector for all proceedings hereinafter to be taken in respect of the said land. Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers A plan of the said land can be inspected at the conferred by Section 7 of the Land Acquisition office of the Special Land Acquisition Officer (N), Act, 1894 (Act 1 of 1894), the Government of Goa W.R.D., Karaswada, Mapusa, Bardez-Goa till the hereby directs the Collector, North Goa District, award is made under Section 11. Panaji-Goa to take the order for acquisition of the said land. SCHEDULE By order and in the name of the Governor (Description of the said land) of Goa. Taluka: Pernem Village: Alorna Ashutosh Apte, Under Secretary (Revenue-I). Survey No./ Names of the persons Area in Porvorim, 19th February, 2015. /Sub-Div. No. believed to be interested sq. mts. ______12 3

Notification 274/3 part O: 1. Gajanan Madhav Shenoi 2419 Dessai. No. 23/25/2012-RD 2. Balchandra Laxman Whereas, by Government Notification Kinalkar. No. 23/25/2012-RD dated 11-06-2013 published 3. Govind Shripad Bhende. at Series II No. 13 of the Official Gazette dated 4. Comunidade.

1030 OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA SERIES II No. 48 26TH FEBRUARY, 2015

12 312 3 5. Government of Goa: 282/42 part O: 1. Comunidade. 63 Executive Engineer, T: 1. Bhiku Vasu Dhuri. W.D.VII, GTIDC, 282/41 part O: 1. Comunidade. 68 Dhargal, Pernem. T: 1. Dhondu Nhanu Raul. T: 1. Govind Shripad Bhende. 282/40 part O: 1. Comunidade. 44 280/1 part O: 1. Pundalik Naik Arabekar. 5447 T: 1. Krishna Narayan Raul. T: 1. Govind Shripad Bhende. 282/39 part O: 1. Comunidade. 40 282/60 part O: 1. Comunidade. 532 T: 1. Babani Keshav Raul. 2. Government of Goa: 282/38 part O: 1. Comunidade. 66 T: 1. Bala Jayram Raul. Directorate of Health 282/37 part O: 1. Comunidade. 59 Services, Panaji-Goa T: 1. Gunu Ravji Raul. 2125 M2. 282/36 part O: 1. Comunidade. 67 T: 1. Bhiko Fati Raul. T: 1. Hari Sakharam Raul. 2. Shankar Ramchandra 282/35 part O: 1. Comunidade. 88 Parabekar. T: 1. Dattaram Bala Raul. 3. Rajaram Bhilo Raul. 282/34 part O: 1. Comunidade. 70 4. Madhu Laxman Halarnkar. T: 1. Shantaram Vasu Raul. 5. Mukund Sathu Halarnkar. 282/33 part O: 1. Comunidade. 62 282/59 part O: 1. Comunidade. 36 T: 1. Arjun Puno Raul. T: 1. Vishram Pandurang Naik. 282/32 part O: 1. Comunidade. 27 282/58 part O: 1. Comunidade. 34 T: 1. Nilu Ladu Raul. T: 1. Rama Durga Naik. 282/31 part O: 1. Comunidade. 12 282/57 part O: 1. Comunidade. 34 T: 1. Vitho Bandro Raul. T: 1. Balchandra Chandrakant 282/30 part O: 1. Comunidade. 64 Naik. T: 1. Arjun Govind Raul. 282/56 part O: 1. Comunidade. 38 282/29 part O: 1. Comunidade. 65 T: 1. Shankar Rama Raul. T: 1. Bablo Govind Gaundalkar. 282/55 part O: 1. Comunidade. 38 282/28 part O: 1. Comunidade. 69 T: 1. Navso Rama Raul. T: 1. Narayan Sadu Pandit. 282/54 part O: 1. Comunidade. 45 282/27 part O: 1. Comunidade. 40 T: 1. Gajanan Pundalik Raul. T: 1. Krishna Bhongado Pandit. 282/53 part O: 1. Comunidade. 48 282/26 part O: 1. Comunidade. 73 T: 1. Tukaram Krishna Raul. T: 1. Gajanan Sadhu Raul. 282/25 part O: 1. Comunidade. 65 282/52 part O: 1. Comunidade. 43 T: 1. Parshram Atmaram Raul. T: 1. Mahadev Ghanu Raul. 282/24 part O: 1. Comunidade. 73 282/51 part O: 1. Comunidade. 52 T: 1. Navso Guno Pandit. T: 1. Vasant Sakharam Raul. 282/23 part O: 1. Comunidade. 75 282/50 part O: 1. Comunidade. 48 2. Government. T: 1. Mahadev Rama Raul. T: 1. Keshav Deu Gawandi. 282/49 part O: 1. Comunidade. 48 2. Shivram Desh Malik. T: 1. Shridhar Shankar Raul. 282/22 part O: 1. Comunidade. 25 282/48 part O: 1. Comunidade. 42 T: 1. Mohan Vishnu Gawandi. T: 1. Raghoba Dattaram Raul. 284/3 part O: 1. Balchandra Shenoi 205 282/47 part O: 1. Comunidade. 44 Dessai. 1/3 T: 1. Narayan Vasu Gawas. 2. Anant Vishram Bhende. 1/3 282/46 part O: 1. Comunidade. 67 3. Rajendra Vassudev T: 1. Ramchandra Devu Raul. Deshprabhu. 1/3 T: 1. Novso Rama Raul. 282/45 part O: 1. Comunidade. 36 284/19 part O: 1. Comunidade. 148 T: 1. Bablo Laghu Raul. T: 1. Navso Rama Raul. 282/44 part O: 1. Comunidade. 41 232/83 part O: 1. Comunidade. 600 T: 1. Bhikaji Laghu Raul. T: 1. Raghoba Dattaram Raul. 282/43 part O: 1. Comunidade. 39 233/11 part O: 1. Keshav Deu Gawandi. 370 T: 1. Suresh Hari Gaundalkar. T: Nil.

1031 OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA SERIES II No. 48 26TH FEBRUARY, 2015

12 312 3 233/12 part O: 1. Shiva Pandurang Naik. 667 4. Rajaram Keshav Parab. T: Nil. 5. Shankar Vithal Parab. 233/13 part O: 1. Ladu Krishna Teli. 52 T: Nil. T: Nil. 223/4 part O: 1. Suryakant Babani Parab. 230 229/1 part O: 1. Krishna Babli Parab. 3290 T: Nil. 2. Gajanan Mahadev Parab. 223/5 part O: 1. Atmaram Ramchandra 374 3. Rama Krishnoba Parab. Parab. 4. Jairam Keshav Parab. 2. Rajaram Ramchandra 5. Suryakant Babani Parab. Parab. 6. Babani Krishnoba Parab. T: Nil. T: Nil. 223/6 part O: 1. Rajaram Kesshav Parab. 127 229/2 part O: 1. Bapu Tuke Parab. 25 2. Vasudev Narayan Parab. 2. Fati Tuke Parab. T: Nil. 3. Atmaram Vishnu Parab. 223/7 part O: 1. Baba Narayan Dessai. 92 T: 1. Rajaram Lingudkar. 2. Vasudev Narayan Dessai. 229/3 part O: 1. Bapu Tuke Parab. 145 3. Saraswati Raghunath 2. Fati Tuke Parab. Parab. 3. Atmaram Vishnu Parab. T: 1. Sukhaji Hari Parab. T: 1. Sakharam Mahadev 223/8 part O: 1. Babaji Gangaram Parab. 101 Shirodkar. 2. Shivram Govind Parab. 229/4 part O: 1. Bapu Tuke Parab. 280 3. Krishno Babani Parab. 2. Fati Tuke Parab. T: Nil. 3. Atmaram Vishnu Parab. 223/9 part O: 1. Appa Bapu Parab. 51 T: 1. Rama Tukaram Shirodkar. T: Nil. 229/5 part O: 1. Bapu Tuke Parab. 165 223/10 part O: 1. Gunoji Fati Parab. 63 2. Fati Tuke Parab. 2. Babani Tuke Parab. 3. Atmaram Vishnu Parab. T: Nil. T: 1. Arjun Rajaram Lingudkar. 223/11 part O: 1. Shankar Vithal Parab. 207 229/6 part O: 1. Bapu Tuke Parab. 240 2. Narayan Mahadev Parab. 2. Fati Tuke Parab. 3. Vishnu Shamba Parab. 3. Atmaram Vishnu Parab. 4. Rajaram Keshav Parab. T: 1. Sakharam Mahadev 5. Mukund Babaji Parab. Shirodkar. T: Nil. 229/9 part O: 1. Bapu Tuke Parab. 137 223/12 part O: 1. Atmaram Ramchandra 196 2. Fati Tuke Parab. Parab. 3. Atmaram Vishnu Parab. 2. Rajaram Ramchandra T: 1. Rajaram Ladu Lingudkar. Parab. 231/2 part O: 1. Comunidade. 286 T: Nil. T: 1. Bapu Tuke Parab. 223/13 part O: 1. Atmaram Ramchandra 211 227/5 part O: 1. Vishnu Ganesh Deshprabhu. 1475 Parab. 2. Shiva Ladu Parab. 2. Rajaram Ramchandra 3. Laxman Ravji Parab. Parab. 4. Babaji Bhiva Parab. T: Nil. 5. Sagun Mukund Parab. 223/14 part O: 1. Shankar Vithal Parab. 154 6. Bapu Tuke Parab. 2. Narayan Mahadev Parab. T: 1. Sukhaji Hari Parab. 3. Vishnu Shamba Parab. 223/1 part O: 1. Appa Bapu Parab. 106 4. Rajaram Keshav Parab. T: Nil. T: Nil. 223/2 part O: 1. Gunoji Fati Parab. 76 223/15 part O: 1. Vasudev Narayan Parab. 145 2. Babani Tuke Parab. 2. Baba Narayan Parab. T: Nil. 223/3 part O: 1. Mukund Babaji Parab. 190 3. Saraswati Raghunath 2. Narayan Mahadev Parab. Parab. 3. Vishnu Shamba Parab. T: 1. Sukhaji Hari Parab.

1032 OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA SERIES II No. 48 26TH FEBRUARY, 2015

12 312 3 223/16 part O: 1. Suryakant Babani Parab. 52 21. Babaji Bhiva Sawant. T: Nil. 22. Shantaram Nana Sawant. 223/17 part O: 1. Babaji Gangaram Parab. 41 23. Keshav Jairam Sawant. 2. Shivram Govind Parab. 24. Ladu Shiva Parab. T: Nil. 25. Krishnobha Babani Parab. 223/18 part O: 1. Gunoji Fati Parab. 50 26. Shankar Nana Parab. 2. Babani Tuke Parab. 199/1 part O: 1. Shridev Satteri Halarna. 287 T: Nil. T: 1. Laxman Shiva Awadkar. 223/19 part O: 1. Appa Bapu Parab. 47 199/4 part O: 1. Shridev Satteri Halarna. 135 T: Nil. T: Nil. 223/21 part O: 1. Suryakant Babani Parab. 714 199/5 part O: 1. Shridev Satteri Halarna. 15 T: Nil. T: 1. Babaji Gangaram Parab. 222/0 part O: 1. Comunidade. 292 200/2 part O: 1. Vishnu Shamba Parab. 71 T: 1. Rajaram Ramchandra 2. Narayan Mahadev Parab. Parab. 3. Shankar Vittal Parab. 2. Shamba Vishnu Parab. 4. Rajaram Keshav Parab. 221/1 part O: 1. Mahadev Badhu Sawant. 1165 5. Mukund Babaji Parab. 2. Ganapat Bapu Sawant. T: Nil. 3. Vittu Mashe Sawant. 200/3 part O: 1. Vasu Bapu Parab. 86 4. Rubji Laxman Sawant. 2. Deu Narayan Parab. 5. Sakharam Sabha Sawant. 3. Babani Tuke Parab. 6. Ramchandra Ravji Sawant. T: Nil. 7. Sukhanti Hari Parab. 200/4 part O: 1. Baba Narayan Dessai. 82 8. Kashinath Hari Parab. 2. Saraswati Reghunath Parab. 9. Sakharam Hari Parab. 3. Sitabai Ramchandra Parab. T: Nil. 4. Anant Dhake Parab. 5. Chandrakant Arjun Parab. 221/5 part O: 1. Babli Laxman Chari. 410 6. Ladu Shiva Parab. T: 1. Vittu Mashe Gawas. 7. Appa Bapu Parab. 221/3 part O: 1. Reghu Bathko Harijan. 710 8. Vassudev Narayan Parab. 2. Bhicko Sagun Harijan. T: 1. Sukhaji Hari Parab. T: Nil. 2. Kashinath Hari Parab. 178/1 part O: 1. Bapu Tuke Parab. 4805 3. Sakharam Hari Parab. 2. Fati Tuke Parab. 4. Ramchandra Gunaji Parab. 3. Atmaram V. Parab. 200/5 part O: 1. Krishna Babani Parab. 71 4. Atmaram Ramchandra 2. Madhusudan Krishnaji S. Parab. Dessai. 5. Rajaram Ramchandra 3. Keshav Jairam Parab. Parab. T: Nil. 6. Sukhaji Hari Parab. 200/6 part O: 1. Jairam Ramchandra Parab. 94 2. Atmaram Ramchandra 7. Kashinath Hari Parab. Parab. 8. Sakharam Hari Parab. T: Nil. 9. Atma Bapu Parab. 200/7 part O: 1. Vishnu Shamba Parab. 111 10. Babaji Gangaram Parab. 2. Narayan Mahadev Parab. 11. Shivram Govind Parab. 3. Shankar Vittal Parab. 12. Babani Tuke Parab. 4. Rajaram Keshav Parab. 13. Gunaji Fati Parab. 5. Mukund Babaji Parab. 14. Rajaram Keshav Parab. T: Nil. 15. Vishnu Shamba Parab. 200/8 part O: 1. Babaji Gangaram Parab. 56 16. Shankar Vittal Parab. 2. Shivram Govind Parab. 17. Narayan Mahadev Parab. T: Nil. 18. Shripad Krishna Sawant. 200/9 part O: 1. Government. 52 19. Laxman Ravji Sawant. T: 1. Vaman Tathe Parab. 20. Sagun Mukund Sawant. 2. Gunaji Fati Parab.

1033 OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA SERIES II No. 48 26TH FEBRUARY, 2015

12 312 3 200/10 part O: 1. Appa Bapu Parab. 61 Boundaries: T: Nil. North : S. No. 272/20, 274/3, 280/1, 200/13 part O: 1. Vishnu Shamba Parab. 67 282/22 to 60, 284/3, 19, 232/83, 2. Narayan Mahadev Parab. 233/4, 12, 13, 229/1, 19, 231/2, 3. Shankar Vittal Parab. 223/21, 227/5, 222, 221/1, 3, 5, 4. Rajaram Keshav Parab. Nalla, 178/1, 200/2 to 10, 13, 5. Mukund Babaji Parab. 14, 15, 18, 17, 19, 199/4, 5, T: Nil. 198/22 to 24. 200/14 part O: 1. Atmaram Ramchandra 79 Parab. South : S. No. 272/20, 274/3, 280/1, 2. Rajaram Ramchandra 282/33 to 60, 23 to 30, 284/3, Parab. 19, 232/83, 233/11, 12, 13, 229/4, T: Nil. 10, 231/2, 227/5, 223/21, 222, 200/15 part O: 1. Appa Bapu Parab. 66 221/1, 5, 3, 178/1, 200/2 to 10, T: Nil. 13, 14, 15, 18, 19, 17, 198/20 to 200/17 part O: 1. Government. 46 T: 1. Vaman Tathe Parab. 22, 26, Nalla, Road. 2. Gunaji Fati Parab. East : S. No. 274/3, 272/20, 280/1, 282/60, 200/18 part O: 1. Babli Kaxman Chari. 177 233/11, 232/83, 233/13, 229/1 to 6, 2. Krishno Babani Parab. 9, 227/5, 223/1 to 19, 221/1, 178/1, 3. Keshav Jairam Parab. 198/24 to 26, Road. T: 1. Mahadev Krishna Naik. West : S. No. 272/20, 274/3, 280/1, 282/60, 200/19 part O: 1. Babli Kaxman Chari. 148 T: 1. Mahadev Krishna Naik. 232/83, 233/11, 227/5, 223/1 to 15, 198/22 part O: 1. Rajendra Vassudev 15 221/1, 178/1, 199/1, 198/22 to 26, Deshprabhu. 229/1, 4 to 6, Road. 2. Reghuraj Vassudev Total: 32731 Deshprabhu. T: 1. Krishno Babani Parab. By order and in the name of the Governor 198/23 part O: 1. Rajendra Vassudev 60 of Goa. Deshprabhu. Anju S. Kerkar, Under Secretary (Revenue-II). 2. Reghuraj Vassudev Porvorim, 10th February, 2015. Deshprabhu. ______T: 1. Ladu Shiva Parab. Notification 198/24 part O: 1. Govind Laxman Parab. 55 T: Nil. No. 23/19/2013-RD 198/25 part O: 1. Rajendra Vassudev 23 Whereas, by Government Notification Deshprabhu. No. 23/19/2013-RD dated 20-06-2013 published 2. Reghuraj Vassudev at Series II No. 14 of the Official Gazette dated Deshprabhu. 04-07-2013 and in two local newspapers, T: 1. Ganesh Keshav Parab. namely “The Navhind Times” and “Sunaparant” 198/26 part O: 1. Rajendra Vassudev 58 both dated 27-06-2013 and Corrigendum Deshprabhu. No. 23/19/2013-RD dated 06-09-2013 published at Series II No. 25 of the Official Gazette dated 2. Reghuraj Vassudev 19-09-2013 and in two local newspapers namely Deshprabhu. “The Navhind Times” and “Sunaparant” both T: 1. Ladu Shiva Parab. dated 17-09-2013 it was notified under Section 4 272/20 part O: 1. Comunidade. 1761 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (Central Act 1 T: 1. Govind Shripad Bhende. of 1894) (hereinafter referred to as “the said Act”), 272/14 part O: 1. Govind Shirpad Bhende. 15 that the land specified in the Schedule appended T: Nil. to the said Notification (hereinafter referred to as

1034 OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA SERIES II No. 48 26TH FEBRUARY, 2015 the said land), was needed for public purpose, viz. 12 3 Land Acquisition for construction of M-6 Minor of RBMC of TIP in Dhargal Village of Pernem Taluka. 10. Jairam Balkrishna Prabhudessai. And whereas, the Government of Goa 11. Shivaji Govind Dessai (hereinafter referred to as “the Government”) after Parsekar. considering the report made under sub-section (2) 12. Vaman Vishnu of Section 5-A of the said Act is satisfied that the Prabhudessai. land specified in the Schedule hereto (hereinafter 13. Shivram Balkrishna referred to as “the said land”), is needed for the Prabhudessai. public purpose now specified as Land Acquisition 14. Bhalchandra Mukund for construction of M-6 Minor of RBMC of TIP of Prabhudessai. Water Resources Department in Dhargal Village 15. Raoji Pandurag of Pernem Taluka, on dissolution of the Goa Tillari Prabhudessai. Irrigation Development Corporation. 16. Ganshyam Vothal Prabhudessai. Now, therefore, the Government hereby 17. Govt. of Goa: Executive declares under the provisions of Section 6 of the Engineer, W.D. VII, GTIDC, said Act that the said land is required for the Dhargal, Pernem public purpose specified above. 13260 sq. mts. The Government also hereby appoints under T: Nil. Clause (c) of Section 3 of the said Act, the Special Other Rights: Land Acquisition Officer (N), W.R.D., Karaswada, Dhareshwar Temple, Mapusa, Bardez-Goa to perform the functions of Narayan Temple, the Collector for all proceedings hereinafter to be Bhumika, Vez, Tulas, taken in respect of the said land. Deepmala, Smadhi. 226/2 O: 1. Madhusudhan Neelkant 1379 A plan of the said land can be inspected at the Prabhudessai. office of the Special Land Acquisition Officer (N), 2. Balkrishna Ladkhoba W.R.D., Karaswada, Mapusa, Bardez-Goa till the Prabhudessai. award is made under Section 11. T: Nil. SCHEDULE 226/3 O: 1. Raghunath Gangaji 270 Prabhudessai. (Description of the said land) 2. Gangaji Pandurang Taluka: Pernem Village: Dhargal Prabhudessai. T: Nil. Survey No./ Names of the persons Area in 226/4 O: 1. Keshav Vithal Kambli. 417 /Sub-Div. No. believed to be interested sq. mts. 2. Nhanu Vithal Kambli. 12 3226/5 O: 1. Mahadev Ganashyam 370 Prabhudessai. 258/2 O: 1. Rukmini Ladkobha 159 2. Raghuvir Ramachandra Prabhudessai. Churi. 2. Uttam Gopal 3. Madhusudhan Neelkant Prabhudessai. Prabhudessai. 3. Jaiwanthi Ganpat Matkar. 4. Uttam Arjun Kesarkar. 4. Kashibai Pandurang 5. Yeshwant Arjun Kesarkar. Prabhudessai. 6. Uttam Jayram Dhargalkar. 5. Ganshyam Yashwant 7. Anant Mahadev Prabhudessai. Dhargalkar. 6. Raghunath Keshav 8. Surya Shiva Dhargalkar. Prabhudessai. 9. Balkrishna Ladkobha 7. Mahadev Ganshyam Deshprabhu. Prabhudessai. T: Nil. 8. Raoji Tukaram 225/1 O: 1. Raghunath Keshav 2506 Prabhudessai. Prabhudessai. 9. Bhalchandra Gopal 2. Mahadev Ganashyam Prabhudessai. Prabhudessai.

1035 OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA SERIES II No. 48 26TH FEBRUARY, 2015

12 312 3 3. Raoji Tukaram 7. Rajendra Vassudev Prabhudessai. Deshprabhu. 4. Jayram Balkrishna 8. Ramchandra Mahadev Prabhudessai. Parab Dessai. 5. Ramesh Uttam T: 1. Venkatesh Govind Azerekar. Prabhudessai. 164/0 O: 1. Venkatesh Govind Azerekar. 1366 T: Nil. 2. Ganesh Govind Azerekar. 224/1 O: 1. Shridev Narayan. 2053 3. Shriram Govind Azerekar. 2. Narayan Valsala Colvalkar. 4. Shrikant Laxman Laad. 3. Govind Jashvantrao 5. Keshav Krishnaji Laad. Dessai. 6. Madhusuadhan Krishnaji 4. Raghuvir Ramchandra Shenvi. Churi. T: 1. Venkatesh Govind Azerekar. 5. Appa Babani Dhargalkar. 163/8 O: 1. Venkatesh Govind Azerekar. 62 6. Gopal Ramchandra 2. Ganesh Govind Azerekar. Prabhudessai. 3. Shriram Govind Azerekar. 7. Kashibai Pandurang 4. Shrikant Laxman Laad. Prabhudessai. 5. Keshav Krishnaji Laad. 8. Madhusudhan Neelkant 6. Madhusuadhan Krishnaji Prabhudessai. Shenvi. 9. Rajendra Vassudev T: 1. Rama Krishna Mandrekar. Deshprabhu. 163/7 O: 1. Venkatesh Govind Azerekar. 115 10. Baburao Gopal 2. Ganesh Govind Azerekar. Dhargalkar. 3. Shriram Govind Azerekar. T: 1. Baburao Atmaram 4. Shrikant Laxman Laad. Kesarkar. 5. Keshav Krishnaji Laad. 2. Govind Bhiva Halarnkar. 6. Madhusuadhan Krishnaji 3. Raghuvir Ramchandra Shenvi. Churi. T: 1. Harichandra Babu 4. Krishnaji Kashinath Salgaonkar. Marathe. 163/6 O: 1. Venkatesh Govind Azerekar. 95 5. Vinayak Raghunath 2. Ganesh Govind Azerekar. 3. Shriram Govind Azerekar. Prabhudessai. 4. Shrikant Laxman Laad. OR: 1. Narayan Appa Bhivji- 5. Keshav Krishnaji Laad. -Caretaker. 6. Madhusuadhan Krishnaji 227/10 O: 1. Rajendra Vassudev 365 Shenvi. Deshprabhu. T: 1. Rama Laxman Mandrekar. T: 1. Vinayak Raghunath 163/5 O: 1. Venkatesh Govind Azerekar. 105 Prabhudessai. 2. Ganesh Govind Azerekar. 198/4 O: 1. Rajendra Vassudev 447 3. Shriram Govind Azerekar. Deshprabhu. 4. Shrikant Laxman Laad. T: 1. Narayan Appa Bhivji. 5. Keshav Krishnaji Laad. 2. Nakul Bablo Harmalkar. 6. Madhusuadhan Krishnaji 3. Atmaram Punkulo Shenvi. Salgaonkar. T: 1. Harichandra Babu 4. Kusthadh Rosario Cunha. Salgaonkar. 5. Karidhadhe Rosario Cunha. 159/2 O: 1. Rajendra Vassudev 760 165/1 O: 1. Ganesh Govind Azerekar. 1525 Deshprabhu. 2. Shriram Govind Azerekar. 2. Francis Rodrigues- 3. Venkatesh Govind Azerekar. -500 sq. m. land. 4. Mahadev Ganshyam T: Nil. Prabhudessai. 159/1 O: 1. Gajanan Janardhan 1231 5. Keshav Krishnaji Laad. Zarapkar. 6. Shrikant Laxman Laad. T: Nil.

1036 OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA SERIES II No. 48 26TH FEBRUARY, 2015

12 3of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (Central Act 1 of 1894) (hereinafter referred to as “the said Act”), 47/1 O: 1. Jairam Bablo Vaskar. 855 that the land specified in the schedule appended 2. Vishnu Laxman Vaskar. to the said Notification (hereinafter referred to as 3. Narayan Yesso Vaskar. the said land), was needed for public purpose, viz. 4. Shyamsundar Vassudev Land Acquisition for the construction of Bastora Bandodkar. Minor-I from Ch. 0.00 m to Ch. 1310 m of LBMC of 5. Vamanji Jeshwant Dessai. TIP in Bastora Village of Bardez Taluka (addl. area). 6. Ajith Sumantarao And whereas, the Government of Goa Bandodkar. (hereinafter referred to as “the Government”) after 7. Shanta Chandrakant considering the report made under sub-section (2) Kolwalkar. of Section 5-A of the said Act is satisfied that the T: 1. Narayan Yesso Vaskar. land specified in the Schedule hereto (hereinafter 46/18 O: 1. Jairam Bablo Vaskar. 1120 referred to as “the said land”), is needed for 2. Vishnu Laxman Vaskar. the public purpose now specified as Land 3. Narayan Yesso Vaskar. Acquisition for the construction of Bastora Minor- 4. Shyamsundar Vassudev I from Ch. 0.00 m to to Ch. 1310 m of LBMC of TIP Bandodkar. of Water Resources Department in Bastora Village 5. Vaikund Bhavan of Bardez Taluka (addl. area), on dissolution of the Bandodkar. Goa Tillari Irrigation Development Corporation. 6. Shripad Atamaram Dessai. Now, therefore, the Government hereby 7. Ajith Sumantarao declares under the provisions of Section 6 of the Bandodkar. said Act that the said land is required for the T: Nil. public purpose specified above. Boundaries: The Government also hereby appoints under North : S. No. 225, 226/2 to 5, 159/1, Clause (c) of Section 3 of the said Act, the Special 258/2. Land Acquisition Officer (N), WRD, Karaswada, Mapusa, Bardez-Goa to perform the functions of South : S. No. 46/18, 160/4-A, 4-A-6, the Collector for all proceedings hereinafter to be Road. taken in respect of the said land. East : S. No. 225, 224/1, 227/10, A plan of the said land can be inspected at the 198/4, 165, 164, 163/5 to 8, office of the Special Land Acquisition Officer (N), 159/2, 160/4, 4-A, 6, 6-A, 6-B, WRD, Karaswada, Mapusa, Bardez-Goa till the 258/2, 36/1, 38/1. award is made under Section 11. West : S. No. 225, 165, 164, 163/5 to 8, SCHEDULE 258/2, 226/2, 224/1, 227/10, (Description of the said land) 198/4, 159/2, 147/1, 46/18. Taluka: Bardez Village: Bastora Total: 15200 Survey No./ Names of the persons Area in By order and in the name of the Governor /Sub-Div. No. believed to be interested sq. mts. of Goa. 123 Anju S. Kerkar, Under Secretary (Revenue-II). 8/1 part O: Comunidade of Bastora. 9 Porvorim, 10th February, 2015. T: Prabakar Dattaram ______Morajkar. 8/2 part O: Comunidade of Bastora. 96 Notification T: Maria Conceisao No. 23/27/2013-RD Fernandes. 8/4 part O: Comunidade of Bastora. 85 Whereas, by Government Notification T: Cicilia Fernandes. No. 23/27/2013-RD dated 04-10-2013 published 8/5 part O: Comunidade of Bastora. 535 at Series II No. 29 of the Official Gazette dated T: Fr. Blazio Antonio DSouza. 17-10-2013 and in two local newspapers, 11/4 part O: Comunidade of Bastora. 880 namely “Lokmat” and “The Times of India” both T: Rajaram Narayan dated 08-10-2013, it was notified under Section 4 Kautankar.

1037 OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA SERIES II No. 48 26TH FEBRUARY, 2015

12 3Land Acquisition for providing approach road to parking space through survey No. 8 and parking 11/13 part O: Comunidade of Bastora. 18 space in Survey No. 11, 1, 19 (part) of village Ponda. T: Prabhakar Dattaram Thereafter Government issued Notification No. 22/ Morajkar. 7/2010-RD dated 17-09-2013, thereby amending 161/4 part O: Comunidade of Bastora. 24 Principal Notification u/s 6 of the L.A. Act, read T: Angelina Aranjo. with Section 21, published in Official Gazette 161/5 part O: Comunidade of Bastora. 191 Series II No. 26 dated 26-09-2013 in two T: Gulab Saulo Mashelkar. local newspapers viz. “Gomantak Times” and 161/6 part O: Comunidade of Bastora. 137 “Goa Doot” both dated 19-9-2013. T: Arjun Chandra Bicholker. T: Gunasi Arjun Bicholker. And whereas, in the opinion of the Govern- 161/7 part O: Comundade of Bastora. 59 ment of Goa (hereinafter referred to as the T: Joao Ignatius D Souza. “Government”), a portion of the said land as specified in the appended Schedule hereto is not Boundaries : required for the aforesaid purpose. North : S. No. 161/4, 5, 6, 7, 8/4, Now, therefore, the Government of Goa in Nalla, Road. pursuance of sub-section (1) of Section 48 of the South : S. No. 161/4, 5, 6, 7, 8/5, Road. said Act and all other powers enabling it in this behalf hereby withdraw from acquisition of the East : S. No. 11/4, 13, 8/1, 2, 4, 161/7, portion of said land as specified in the schedule 8/5. hereto. West : S. No. 161/4, 8/1, 2, 4, 5, 11/4, 13. A plan of the said land shall be available for Total: 2034 inspection at the Office of the Collector, North Goa District, Panaji for a period of 30 days from the By order and in the name of the Governor date of publication of this Notification. of Goa. SCHEDULE Anju S. Kerkar, Under Secretary (Revenue-II). (Description of the said land) Porvorim, 10th February, 2015. Taluka: Ponda Village: Ponda ______Survey No./ Names of the persons Approx. Notification /Sub-Div. No. believed to be interested area in sq. mts. No. 22/7/2010-RD 123 Whereas, by Government Notification 8 2 part: Gajanan Shankar Sawant. 770 No. 22/7/2010-RD dated 16-07-2010 published 6 part 1. Rawalnath Shankar Sawant. 100 in Series II No. 17 of the Official Gazette dated 2. Gajanan Shankar Sawant. 22nd July, 2010 and in two local newspapers, 3. Krishnanath Shankar Sawant. viz. “Lokmat” and “The Times of India” both 5 part 1. Rawalnath Shankar Sawant. 265 dated 21-07-2010 and Corrigendum to the 2. Krishnanath Shankar Sawant. Notification issued u/s 4(1) of the Land Acquisition 4 part 1. Rawalnath Shankar Sawant. 7 Act, 1894 (Central Act 1 of 1894) (hereinafter 2. Government of Goa, Executive referred to as “the said Act”) bearing No. 22/7/ Engineer, W.D. III, Water /2010-RD dated 19-07-2011 published in Series II Resources Dept., Ponda-Goa. No. 16 of the Official Gazette dated 21st July, 2011 7 part Laxmi Kalu Naik. 335 & in two local newspapers viz. “Herald”and 8 part 1. Gajanan Shankar Sawant. 335 “Tarun Bharat” both dated 21-07-2011. Notification 2. Rawalnath Shankar Sawant. under Section 6 of the said Act bearing No. 22/7/ 3. Krishnanath Shankar Sawant. /2010-RD dated 01-11-2011 has been published in 9 part 1. Laxmi Kalu Naik. 217 Official Gazette Series II No. 32 dated 10-11-2011 10 part 1. Gajanan Shankar Sawant. 217 and in two local newspapers viz. “Lokmat” and 2. Rawalnath Shankar Sawant. “The Navhind Times” both dated 06-11-2011, that 3. Krishnanath Shankar Sawant. the land specified in the Schedule appended to 15 part 1. Rawalnath Shankar Sawant. 39 the said Notification (hereinafter referred to as the 2. Gajanan Shankar Sawant. said land), was needed for public purpose, viz. 3. Krishnanath Shankar Sawant.

1038 OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA SERIES II No. 48 26TH FEBRUARY, 2015

12 3the Collector for all proceedings hereinafter to be taken in respect of the said land. 4. Government of Goa, Executive Engineer, W.D. III, Water A plan of the said land can be inspected at the Resources Dept., Ponda-Goa. office of the Special Land Acquisition Officer (N), 1 Part 1. Rawalnath Shankar Sawant. 40 W.R.D., Karaswada, Mapusa, Bardez-Goa till the 2. Gajanan Shankar Sawant. award is made under Section 11. 3. Krishnanath Shankar Sawant. SCHEDULE Total: 2325 (Description of the said land)

By order and in the name of the Governor Taluka: Bardez Village: Guirim of Goa. Survey No./ Names of the persons Area in Ashutosh Apte, Under Secretary (Revenue-I). /Sub-Div. No. believed to be interested sq. mts. 12 3 Porvorim, 12th February, 2015. ______133/1 part Comunidade. 11 T: Kanta Shamba Kasker. Notification 133/2 part O: Comunidade. 448 No. 23/16/2013-RD T: Rajaram Biehu Manjreker. 133/3 part O: Comunidade. 179 Whereas, by Government Notification T: Ana Graca Franco. No. 23/16/2013-RD dated 23-06-2013 published at Series II No. 14 of the Official Gazette dated Boundaries: 04-07-2013 and in two local newspapers, North : S. No. 133/1, 2. namely “Herald” and “Sunaparant” both dated South : S. No. 133/3. 02-07-2013, it was notified under Section 4 of the East : S. No. 118/13, 14. Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (Central Act 1 of 1894) West : S. No. 135/7, 132/4. (hereinafter referred to as “the said Act”), that the land specified in the Schedule appended to Total: 638 the said Notification (hereinafter referred to as the By order and in the name of the Governor said land), was needed for public purpose, viz. of Goa. Land Acquisition for construction of Bastora Minor–2 from Ch. 0.00 km. to Ch. 2.340 km. of LBMC Anju S. Kerkar, Under Secretary (Revenue-II). of TIP in Guirim Village of Bardez Taluka Porvorim, 9th February, 2015. (additional area). ______And whereas, the Government of Goa Notification (hereinafter referred to as “the Government”) after considering the report made under sub-section (2) No. 23/18/2013-RD of Section 5-A of the said Act is satisfied that the Whereas, by Government Notification land specified in the Schedule hereto (hereinafter No. 23/18/2013-RD dated 20-06-2013 published referred to as “the said land”), is needed for the at Series II No. 14 of the Official Gazette dated public purpose now specified as Land Acquisition 04-07-2013 and in two local newspapers, for construction of Bastora Minor–2 from namely “Pudhari” and “The Navhind Times” both Ch. 0.00 km. to Ch. 2.340 km. of LBMC of TIP of dated 26-06-2013, it was notified under Section 4 Water Resources Department, in Guirim Village of of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (Central Act 1 Bardez Taluka (additional area) on dissolution of of 1894) (hereinafter referred to as “the said Act”), the Goa Tillari Irrigation Development Corporation. that the land specified in the Schedule appended to the said Notification (hereinafter referred to as Now, therefore, the Government hereby the said land), was needed for public purpose, viz. declares under the provisions of Section 6 of the Land Acquisition for construction of Siolim said Act that the said land is required for the distributory from Ch. 1.66 km. to Ch. 5.455 km. of public purpose specified above. LBMC of TIP in Siolim Village of Bardez Taluka The Government also hereby appoints under (additional area). Clause (c) of Section 3 of the said Act, the Special And whereas, the Government of Goa Land Acquisition Officer (N), W.R.D., Karaswada, (hereinafter referred to as “the Government”) after Mapusa, Bardez-Goa to perform the functions of considering the report made under sub-section (2)

1039 OFFICIAL GAZETTE — GOVT. OF GOA SERIES II No. 48 26TH FEBRUARY, 2015 of Section 5-A of the said Act is satisfied that the Department of Transport land specified in the Schedule hereto (hereinafter Directorate of Transport referred to as “the said land”), is needed for the __ public purpose now specified as Land Acquisition for construction of Siolim distributory from Notification Ch. 1.66 km. to Ch. 5.455 km. of LBMC of TIP of No. 5/9/90-Tpt/2015/484 Water Resources Department, in Siolim Village of Bardez Taluka (additional area) on dissolution of In exercise of powers conferred by Clause (xii) the Goa Tillari Irrigation Development Corporation. of sub-rule (1) of Rule 22 of the Goa, Daman and Diu Motor Vehicles Tax Rules, 1974, the Now, therefore, the Government hereby declares under the provisions of Section 6 of the Government of Goa hereby exempts Vehicle said Act that the said land is required for the No. GA-03/N-7755 of make Ashok Leyland (Bus) public purpose specified above. bearing chassis No. JDR141475 and engine No. KDH341435 of model January, 2006 owned by The Government also hereby appoints under Domnic and Jo-an Ministries, H. No. 315/4, Tropa Clause (c) of Section 3 of the said Act, the Special Land Acquisition Officer (N), W.R.D., Karaswada, Vaddo, Sodiem, Siolim, Bardez-Goa, from payment Mapusa, Bardez-Goa to perform the functions of of tax due to this State being Charitable Institution. the Collector for all proceedings hereinafter to be By order and in the name of the Governor taken in respect of the said land. of Goa. A plan of the said land can be inspected at the Arun L. Desai, Director & ex officio Addl. office of the Special Land Acquisition Officer (N), Secretary (Transport). W.R.D., Karaswada, Mapusa, Bardez-Goa till the award is made under Section 11. Panaji, 11th February, 2015. SCHEDULE ———‹‹‹——— (Description of the said land) Taluka: Bardez Village: Siolim Department of Tribal Welfare Directorate of Tribal Welfare Survey No./ Name of the person Approx. __ /Sub-Div. No. believed to be interested area in sq. mts. Notification 123No. DTW/STAT/PC/2012-13/62 Sy. No. 222 part Francisco Pinto De 1970 The Government of Goa is pleased to appoint Menezes. Shri Kamlakar Mhalshi, retired Gr. 1 teacher and Boundaries: Educationalist as member of the State Level North : Sy. No. 222. Committee under the Scheme Setting up of South : Sy. No. 222. Pre-Primary Schools for Scheduled Tribes Children East : Sy. No. 223. in Remote Areas and is hereby published for West : Sy. No. 210/1. general information of public, which shall come Total: 1970 into force from the date of Notification. By order and in the name of the Governor By order and in the name of the Governor of Goa. of Goa. Anju S. Kerkar, Under Secretary (Revenue-II). Sandhya Kamat, Director (Tribal Welfare). Porvorim, 9th February, 2015. Panaji, 18th February, 2015.

www.goaprintingpress.gov.in Published and Printed by the Director, Printing & Stationery, Government Printing Press, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Panaji-Goa 403 001. PRICE–Rs. 26.00 PRINTED AT THE GOVERNMENT PRINTING PRESS, PANAJI-GOA–376/360–2/2015.

1040