1) Mesosomes 2) Vacuoles 3) Ribosomes 4) Lysosomes 3
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Chloroplast Transit Peptides: Structure, Function and Evolution
reviews Chloroplast transit Although the first demonstration of precursor trans- port into chloroplasts was shown over two decades peptides: structure, ago3,4, only now is this area of cell biology becom- ing well understood. Many excellent reviews have been published recently on the evolution of plas- function and tids5, the evolution of organelle genomes6, the mechanism of gene transfer from organelles to the nucleus7 and the mechanism of protein import into evolution chloroplasts8,9. Proteins destined to plastids and other organ- elles share in common the requirement for ‘new’ Barry D. Bruce sequence information to facilitate their correct trafficking within the cell. Although in most cases this information resides in a cleavable, N-terminal sequence often collectively referred to as signal It is thought that two to three thousand different proteins are sequence, the different organelle-targeting se- targeted to the chloroplast, and the ‘transit peptides’ that act as quences have distinct properties and names: ‘signal peptides’ for the endoplasmic reticulum, chloroplast targeting sequences are probably the largest class of ‘presequences’ for the mitochondria and ‘transit peptides’ for chloroplasts and other plastids. This targeting sequences in plants. At a primary structural level, transit review focuses on recent progress in dissecting peptide sequences are highly divergent in length, composition and the role of the stromal-targeting domain of chloro- plast transit peptides. I will consider briefly the organization. An emerging concept suggests that transit peptides multitude of distinct functions that transit peptides contain multiple domains that provide either distinct or overlapping perform, provide an update on the limited struc- tural information of a number of transit peptides functions. -
Centrosome-Nuclear Envelope Tethering and Microtubule Motor
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/442368; this version posted October 12, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Centrosome-nuclear envelope tethering and microtubule motor-based pulling forces collaborate in centrosome positioning during mitotic entry Vincent Boudreau1, Richard Chen1, Alan Edwards1, Muhammad Sulaimain1, Paul S. Maddox1* 1 Department of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill * Direct all correspondence to this author at [email protected]. Centrosome positioning relative to the nucleus and cell nuclear envelope and at the cortex to ensure proper centrosome shape is highly regulated across cell types, during cell migration positioning (De Simone et al., 2016). Dynein regulators including and during spindle formation in cell division. Across most sexual- LIS-1 are also required for centrosome separation in the embryo ly reproducing animals, centrosomes are provided to the oocyte (Cockell et al., 2004), although their spatio-temporal contributions through fertilization and must be positioned properly to establish remain elusive. Despite our understanding of microtubule cyto- the zygotic mitotic spindle. How centrosomes are positioned in skeleton-based pulling forces, the contribution of key mitotic kinas- space and time through the concerted action of key mitotic en- es and phosphatases to centrosome positioning remains unclear. try biochemical regulators including Protein Phosphatase 2A The net effect of molecular regulators is a biophysical (PP2A-B55/SUR-6), biophysical regulators including Dynein mechanism required for positioning centrosomes during mitotic and the nuclear lamina is unclear. -
Evidence for an Alternate Pathway for Lysosomal Enzyme Targeting (Oligosaccharides/Lysosomes/Phosphorylation) CHRISTOPHER A
Proc. NatL Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 80, pp. 775-779, February 1983 Cell Biology Identification and characterization of cells deficient in the mannose 6-phosphate receptor: Evidence for an alternate pathway for lysosomal enzyme targeting (oligosaccharides/lysosomes/phosphorylation) CHRISTOPHER A. GABEL, DANIEL E. GOLDBERG, AND STUART KORNFELD Departments of Internal Medicine and Biological Chemistry, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110 Contributed by Stuart Kornfeld, November 3, 1982 ABSTRACT Newly synthesized lysosomal enzymes acquire dence that this cell line is deficient in Man-6-P receptor activity. phosphomannosyl units, which allow bindingofthe enzymes to the We also identify several additional cell lines that lack receptor mannose 6-phosphate receptor and subsequent translocation to activity yet possess high levels ofintracellular hydrolase activity. lysosomes. In some cell types, this sequence ofevents is necessary These data indicate that some cells possess pathways indepen- for the delivery ofthese enzymes to lysosomes. Using a slime mold dent of the Man-6-P receptor for the intracellular transport of lysosomal hydrolase as a probe, we have identified three murine acid hydrolases to lysosomes. cell lines that lack the receptor and one line that contains very low (3%) receptor activity. Each ofthese lines synthesizes the mannose MATERIALS AND METHODS 6-phosphate recognition marker on its lysosomal enzymes, but, Cells. BW5147 mouse lymphoma, P388D1 mouse macro- unlike cell lines with high levels of receptor, the cells accumulate MOPC 315 oligosaccharides containing phosphomonoesters. The receptor- phage, J774.2 mouse macrophage, mouse L cells, deficient lines possess high levels of intracellular acid hydrolase mouse myeloma, Chinese hamster ovary (CHO), and (human) activity, which is contained in dense granules characteristic of ly- HeLa cells were grown in suspension culture in a minimal es- sosomes. -
A Mitochondria–Lysosome Transport Pathway
RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS Controlling enteric nerve Interestingly, inhibition of integrin signalling The authors used point mutations to establish cell migration or ROCK activity rescued directed migration of that residue Met 44 of actin was essential for the MEFs and normalized the migration of ENCCs F-actin-severing function of Mical. Manipulation A functional gastrointestinal system is in organ cultures. Although the precise function of Mical levels is known to generate abnormal dependent on the enteric nervous system, of Phactr4 remains to be discovered, these data bristle cell processes in Drosophila. In the present which is formed during embryogenesis through demonstrate its role in regulating lamellipodial study, mutation of the Met 44 actin residue colonization of the gut by enteric neural crest actin dynamics through cofilin activity suppressed Mical overexpression phenotypes cells (ENCCs). Now, Niswander and colleagues controlled by integrin and PP1 signalling. CKR and phenocopied Mical loss-of-function effects identify the protein phosphatase 1 (PP1)- and in Drosophila. Together, these findings establish actin-binding protein Phactr4 as a regulator actin as a direct substrate of Mical and reveal of directional and collective ENCC migration a specific oxidation-dependent mechanism (Genes Dev. 26, 69–81; 2012). Actin gets the oxidation to regulate actin filament dynamics and cell Analysis of mouse embryos expressing treatment from Mical processes in vivo. AIZ a Phactr4 mutation known to abolish PP1 binding revealed reduced enteric neuronal Mical, an enzyme mediating redox reactions, numbers and defective organization at is known to promote actin remodelling embryonic day 18.5, and reduced ENCC in response to semaphorin signalling by A mitochondria–lysosome numbers in the gut at earlier stages (E12.5). -
Cell Structure and Function
BIOLOGY Chapter 4: pp. 59-84 10th Edition Cell Structure and S. Sylvia Function Plasma membrane: outer surface that Ribosome: Fimbriae: regulates entrance site of protein synthesis hairlike bristles that and exit of molecules allow adhesion to Mader the surfaces Inclusion body: Conjugation pilus: stored nutrients for elongated, hollow later use appendage used for DNA transfer to other Nucleus: Mesosome: bacterial cells plasma membrane Cytoskeleton: maintains cell that folds into the Nucleoid: shape and assists cytoplasm and location of the bacterial movement of increases surface area chromosome cell parts: Endoplasmic Plasma membrane: reticulum: sheath around cytoplasm that regulates entrance and exit of molecules Cell wall: covering that supports, shapes, and protects cell Glycocalyx: gel-like coating outside cell wall; if compact, called a capsule; if diffuse, called a slime layer Flagellum: rotating filament present in some bacteria that pushes the cell forward *not in plant cells PowerPoint® Lecture Slides are prepared by Dr. Isaac Barjis, Biology Instructor 1 Copyright © The McGraw Hill Companies Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display Outline Cellular Level of Organization Cell theory Cell size Prokaryotic Cells Eukaryotic Cells Organelles Nucleus and Ribosome Endomembrane System Other Vesicles and Vacuoles Energy related organelles Cytoskeleton Centrioles, Cilia, and Flagella 2 Cell Theory Detailed study of the cell began in the 1830s A unifying concept in biology Originated from the work of biologists Schleiden and Schwann in 1838-9 States that: All organisms are composed of cells German botanist Matthais Schleiden in 1838 German zoologist Theodor Schwann in 1839 All cells come only from preexisting cells German physician Rudolph Virchow in 1850’s Cells are the smallest structural and functional unit of organisms 3 Organisms and Cells Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. -
Introduction to the Cell Cell History Cell Structures and Functions
Introduction to the cell cell history cell structures and functions CK-12 Foundation December 16, 2009 CK-12 Foundation is a non-profit organization with a mission to reduce the cost of textbook materials for the K-12 market both in the U.S. and worldwide. Using an open-content, web-based collaborative model termed the “FlexBook,” CK-12 intends to pioneer the generation and distribution of high quality educational content that will serve both as core text as well as provide an adaptive environment for learning. Copyright ©2009 CK-12 Foundation This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/us/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, 171 Second Street, Suite 300, San Francisco, California, 94105, USA. Contents 1 Cell structure and function dec 16 5 1.1 Lesson 3.1: Introduction to Cells .................................. 5 3 www.ck12.org www.ck12.org 4 Chapter 1 Cell structure and function dec 16 1.1 Lesson 3.1: Introduction to Cells Lesson Objectives • Identify the scientists that first observed cells. • Outline the importance of microscopes in the discovery of cells. • Summarize what the cell theory proposes. • Identify the limitations on cell size. • Identify the four parts common to all cells. • Compare prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells. Introduction Knowing the make up of cells and how cells work is necessary to all of the biological sciences. Learning about the similarities and differences between cell types is particularly important to the fields of cell biology and molecular biology. -
Principles of Human Anatomy
Principles of Cells Human Anatomy Cells are the basic living structural, Eleventh Edition functional unit of the body Gerard J. Tortora Cytology is the branch of science that & studies cells Mark T. Nielsen The human body has 100 trillion cells 200 CHAPTER 2 different cell types with a variety of Cells shapes, sizes and functions. Copyright © 2007 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Cell Diversity Generalized Cell Sizes (diameter) Ovum – 140 µm RBC – 8 µm Major parts of a cell µm = 1/10,000 of a cm Shapes Plasma membrane Flat Cytoplasm Oval Cubed Organelles Star shaped Elongated Inclusions Concave Structures Flagella Cilia Microvilli Fluid mosaic model of the plasma membrane Membrane Lipids Phospholipids – 75% Lipid bilayer Glycolipids – 5% Self recognition Cholesterol – 20% Maintains integrity Maintains fluidity Membrane Proteins Functions of the Cell Membrane Integral proteins Extend across the Communication phospholipid bilayer Shape & protection Channels Pores Maintains the electrochemical gradient Receptors Electrical separation of charge Transporters Enzymes Chemical (concentration gradient) Peripheral proteins Selective permeability Loosely attached to inner or outer surface Some substances easily travel across the Enzymes membrane and others do not Cytoskeletal anchors Membrane Transport Membrane Transport Active transport (uses ATP) Passive transport (kinetic energy not ATP) Primary active transport Net diffusion Molecule mover hydrolyzes ATP Movement of molecules from [high] to [low] -
Centrosome Positioning in Vertebrate Development
Commentary 4951 Centrosome positioning in vertebrate development Nan Tang1,2,*,` and Wallace F. Marshall2,` 1Department of Anatomy, Cardiovascular Research Institute, The University of California, San Francisco, USA 2Department Biochemistry and Biophysics, The University of California, San Francisco, USA *Present address: National Institute of Biological Science, Beijing, China `Authors for correspondence ([email protected]; [email protected]) Journal of Cell Science 125, 4951–4961 ß 2012. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd doi: 10.1242/jcs.038083 Summary The centrosome, a major organizer of microtubules, has important functions in regulating cell shape, polarity, cilia formation and intracellular transport as well as the position of cellular structures, including the mitotic spindle. By means of these activities, centrosomes have important roles during animal development by regulating polarized cell behaviors, such as cell migration or neurite outgrowth, as well as mitotic spindle orientation. In recent years, the pace of discovery regarding the structure and composition of centrosomes has continuously accelerated. At the same time, functional studies have revealed the importance of centrosomes in controlling both morphogenesis and cell fate decision during tissue and organ development. Here, we review examples of centrosome and centriole positioning with a particular emphasis on vertebrate developmental systems, and discuss the roles of centrosome positioning, the cues that determine positioning and the mechanisms by which centrosomes respond to these cues. The studies reviewed here suggest that centrosome functions extend to the development of tissues and organs in vertebrates. Key words: Centrosome, Development, Mitotic spindle orientation Introduction radiating out to the cell cortex (Fig. 2A). In some cases, the The centrosome of animal cells (Fig. -
Introduction
Oncogene (2002) 21, 6140 – 6145 ª 2002 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 0950 – 9232/02 $25.00 www.nature.com/onc Introduction Kenji Fukasawa*,1 1Department of Cell Biology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, PO Box 670521, Cincinnati, Ohio, OH 45267-0521, USA Oncogene (2002) 21, 6140 – 6145. doi:10.1038/sj.onc. Centrosomes have recently attracted considerable 1205771 attention primarily because of their potential impor- tance in carcinogenesis. Chromosome instability is a hallmark of virtually all solid cancers, being a Keywords: centrosome; cancer; chromosome instability formidable force that drives multi-step carcinogenesis: either loss or gain of a single chromosome can simultaneously introduce multiple mutations, which are responsible for acquisition of further malignant The centrosome of animal cells is a small non- phenotypes. The presence of more than two centro- membranous organelle, and is often associated with somes in a cell results in the formation of defective the nuclear membrane. It is composed of a pair of mitotic spindles directed by multiple spindle poles, centrioles and a surrounding electron dense matrix of which in turn increases the chromosome segregation protein aggregates referred to as the pericentriolar errors. This potential role of centrosomes in chromo- material (PCM) (Figure 1, also see Figure 1 in Dutertre some instability, hence in cancer development, is by et al., 2002). Each centriole is cylindrical in shape and no means a new-sprung idea. It was initially built with the nine sets of triplet microtubules. The two proposed by Theodor Boveri (1914). In his book, centrioles are paired in close proximity at one end, and The Origin of Malignant Tumors, he wrote, ‘malig- positioned vertical to each other. -
The Emerging Role of Ncrnas and RNA-Binding Proteins in Mitotic Apparatus Formation
non-coding RNA Review The Emerging Role of ncRNAs and RNA-Binding Proteins in Mitotic Apparatus Formation Kei K. Ito, Koki Watanabe and Daiju Kitagawa * Department of Physiological Chemistry, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Science, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan; [email protected] (K.K.I.); [email protected] (K.W.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 11 November 2019; Accepted: 13 March 2020; Published: 20 March 2020 Abstract: Mounting experimental evidence shows that non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) serve a wide variety of biological functions. Recent studies suggest that a part of ncRNAs are critically important for supporting the structure of subcellular architectures. Here, we summarize the current literature demonstrating the role of ncRNAs and RNA-binding proteins in regulating the assembly of mitotic apparatus, especially focusing on centrosomes, kinetochores, and mitotic spindles. Keywords: ncRNA; centrosome; kinetochore; mitotic spindle 1. Introduction Non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) are defined as a class of RNA molecules that are transcribed from genomic DNA, but not translated into proteins. They are mainly classified into the following two categories according to their length—small RNA (<200 nt) and long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) (>200 nt). Small RNAs include traditional RNA molecules, such as transfer RNA (tRNA), small nuclear RNA (snRNA), small nucleolar RNA (snoRNA), PIWI-interacting RNA (piRNA), and micro RNA (miRNA), and they have been studied extensively [1]. Research on lncRNA is behind that on small RNA despite that recent transcriptome analysis has revealed that more than 120,000 lncRNAs are generated from the human genome [2–4]. -
L Is for Lytic Granules: Lysosomes That Kill
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1401Ž. 1998 146±156 View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE Review provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector L is for lytic granules: lysosomes that kill Lesley J. Page 1, Alison J. Darmon 2, Ruth Uellner, Gillian M. Griffiths ) MRC Lab for Molecular Cell Biology, UniÕersity College London, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT, UK Received 23 June 1997; revised 30 October 1997; accepted 31 October 1997 Contents 1. Introduction ................................................... 147 2. CTL function and biochemistry ....................................... 147 2.1. The function of CTL .......................................... 147 2.2. Mechanisms of killing.......................................... 147 2.3. Cytolytic proteins ............................................ 148 2.4. Target cell death ............................................. 149 2.5. Serial killing ............................................... 150 3. The lytic granule as a lysosome ....................................... 150 3.1. Lysosomal contents ........................................... 150 3.2. Lytic granules are acidic compartments ............................... 150 3.3. The lytic granule as an endocytic compartment ........................... 151 4. Lytic granules as secretory organelles ................................... 152 4.1. Sorting of lysosomal proteins ..................................... 152 4.2. Sorting of granzymes and perforin .................................. 152 5. Secretory lysosomes -
The Ins and Outs of Autophagic Ribosome Turnover
Biochemistry, Biophysics and Molecular Biology Publications Biochemistry, Biophysics and Molecular Biology 2019 The Ins and Outs of Autophagic Ribosome Turnover Zakayo Kazibwe Iowa State University, [email protected] Ang-Yu Liu Iowa State University, [email protected] Gustavo C. Macintosh Iowa State University, [email protected] Diane C. Bassham Iowa State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/bbmb_ag_pubs Part of the Cell and Developmental Biology Commons, Genetics Commons, and the Molecular Biology Commons The complete bibliographic information for this item can be found at https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/ bbmb_ag_pubs/260. For information on how to cite this item, please visit http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/howtocite.html. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Biochemistry, Biophysics and Molecular Biology at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Biochemistry, Biophysics and Molecular Biology Publications by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Ins and Outs of Autophagic Ribosome Turnover Abstract Ribosomes are essential for protein synthesis in all organisms and their biogenesis and number are tightly controlled to maintain homeostasis in changing environmental conditions. While ribosome assembly and quality control mechanisms have been extensively studied, our understanding of ribosome degradation is limited. In yeast or animal cells, ribosomes are degraded after transfer into the vacuole or lysosome by ribophagy or nonselective autophagy, and ribosomal RNA can also be transferred directly across the lysosomal membrane by RNautophagy. In plants, ribosomal RNA is degraded by the vacuolar T2 ribonuclease RNS2 after transport by autophagy-related mechanisms, although it is unknown if a selective ribophagy pathway exists in plants.