DOCSLIB.ORG

Highly Elliptical Orbit for Studies of the Carbon Cycle in the Arctic and Boreal Regions

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Highly Elliptical Orbit for Studies of the Carbon Cycle in the Arctic and Boreal Regions Observing CO2 from a highly elliptical orbit for studies of the carbon cycle in the Arctic and boreal regions Ray Nassar1, Chris Sioris2, Dylan B.A. Jones3, Kaley A. Walker3, Chris McLinden4, C. Tom McElroy5 1 Environment Canada - Climate Research Division, [email protected] 2 University of Saskatchewan 3 University of Toronto 4 Environment Canada - Air Quality Research Division 5 York University Arctic Products Validation and Evolution (APVE) workshop, 2014-11-13 Boreal and Arctic Carbon Boreal Forests • Longer growing season and increase in disturbances may enhance or reduce their net carbon flux Tarnocai et al. (2009) Permafrost • 1672 PgC, twice atm mass (835 PgC) with potential for release as CO2, CH4 • ~85 PgC by 2100 (0.8-1.1 PgC/yr) from extrapolation of measurements at an Alaskan site (Schurr et al. 2009) • Models: 104±37 PgC (Schaefer et al. 2011) and 9 - 114 PgC (Schneider von Deimling et al. 2012) by 2100 McDonald et al. (2004) How can satellites play a role? Satellite Orbits and Coverage • Low Earth Orbit (LEO) • Geostationary Orbit (GEO) • Near-polar plane • Near-equatorial plane ~35,800 km altitude • Below ~1000 km altitude • Synchronized with Earth rotation, continuous • If sun-synchronous, global coverage over selected area (< 60°N/S) sampling at fixed overpass • Communications, Weather, Trop Chemistry time (TEMPO, GEO-CAPE, Sentinel-4, GEMS) • GOSAT, OCO-2, TanSat … • Some proposed CO2 and CH4 missions GOSAT (NIES v2.00 2009-08 averaged at 0.9° x 0.9°) Satellite Orbits and Coverage • Low Earth Orbit (LEO) • Geostationary Orbit (GEO) • Near-polar plane • Near-equatorial plane ~35,800 km altitude • Below ~1000 km altitude • Synchronized with Earth rotation, continuous • If sun-synchronous, global coverage over selected area (< 60°N/S) sampling at fixed overpass • Communications, Weather, Trop Chemistry time (TEMPO, GEO-CAPE, Sentinel-4, GEMS) • GOSAT, OCO-2, TanSat … • Some proposed CO2 and CH4 missions Example of Geostationary Fields of Regard Highly Elliptical Orbit (HEO) • WMO Vision for the Global Observing System (GOS) in 2025 • Conservation of angular momentum requires faster motion when close to Earth (perigee), slower motion when far from Earth (apogee) Apogee • Tundra Orbit (2 apogees): T = 24 hr, Ha = 48,300 km • Three Apogee (TAP) Orbit: T= 16 hr, Ha = 43,500 km • Molniya Orbit (4 apogees): T = 12 hr, Ha = 39,800 km T = period, Ha = apogee altitude (higher than GEO 35,800 km) Perigee HEO options summarized in Garand, Trishchenko, Trichtchenko and Nassar (2014), Physics in Canada, 70, (4), in press. Polar Communications and Weather (PCW) • Canadian mission with 2 satellites in Highly Elliptical Orbit (HEO) configuration, under consideration for launch ~ 2020 • Main objectives are to expand Arctic communications capabilities and provide meteorological observations • Canadian Space Agency (CSA) is separately considering additional science instruments under the Polar Highly Elliptical Orbit Science (PHEOS) program • The Weather, Climate and Air quality (WCA) mission concept is an atmospheric research option that completed Phase A in 2012 (PHEOS-WCA PI was Jack McConnell of York U) PCW-PHEOS-WCA Spectral Bands / Species • Fourier Transform Spectrometer (FTS) • UV-Visible Spectrometer (UVS) Band (µm) Band (cm-1) Resolution Target species -1 1 14.2 - 6.7 700 - 1500 0.25 cm T, H 2O, O3, CO, CO2, 2 5.6 - 3.7 1800 - 2700 0.25 cm-1 CH4, HNO3, CH3OH, HCOOH, PAN, HCN, NH3, SO2… FTS -1 3a 1.67 - 1.66 5990 - 6010 0.25 cm CH4 columns -1 3b 1.67 - 1.60 5990 - 6257 0.25 cm CO2 / CH4 columns -1 4 0.766-0.760 13060-13168 0.50 cm O2 A band (psurf, aerosol) UVS 0.280-0.650 ~ 1 nm O3, NO2, aerosol, BrO, HCHO, SO2, … Mass/Volume Compliant Instrument has red bands, but not blue PCW-PHEOS-WCA Instrument Configurations • Fourier Transform Spectrometer (FTS) • UV-Visible Spectrometer (UVS) Optimal Configuration “Lite” CSA All Bands Configuration Allocations Compliant Configuration Size: 30 x 30 x 30 cm3 (27 000 cm3) Mass: 50 kg FTS (aperture 15 cm) Power: 100 W with UVS, 85 kg ~103 800* cm3 FTS (aperture 10 cm) with UVS, 45 kg FTS (aperture 10 cm) ~35 128* cm3 No O2 A band or SWIR CO2 O2 A band and SWIR CO2 No UVS, 37 kg ~25 184* cm3 *configuration volumes given with 20% contingency Observing System Simulation Experiment (OSSE) • Objective: Compare the potential information from HEO vs. LEO for constraining boreal and Arctic CO2 surface fluxes by data assimilation of atmospheric CO2 observations • Approach: – Designate a CO2 model simulation as the ‘Truth’ – Create synthetic observations for LEO and HEO by sampling the model at hypothetical observation locations/times then adding noise – Assimilate each set of synthetic observations to optimize biospheric CO2 fluxes and assess posterior fluxes and uncertainties relative to the ‘Truth’ Nassar, Sioris, Jones, McConnell (2014), Satellite observations of CO2 from a highly elliptical orbit for studies of the Arctic and boreal carbon cycle, J. Geophys. Res. 119, 2654–2673, doi:10.1002/2013JD020337 AGU Research Spotlight: EOS 95, no. 29, 2014-July-22 Generating Synthetic Observations GOSAT: Simulated orbit using SPENVIS (ESA), 3 cross track obs: orbit track, ±263 km, glint subsolar±20° PCW-PHEOS-WCA: Three Apogee Orbit 2 satellites, 8h apart in co-planar 16h orbit Apogee ~43,500 km, Perigee ~8100 km 3 Apogees/day (8:00 and 16:00 local time) observing ±4 h from apogee giving up to 16 h of data per 48 h per region Region/apogee: 48 scans consisting of 56x56 array of 10x10 km2 pixels in 80 min. Checkerboard pattern in FOV to thin data and meet downlink requirement. Observations every other repeat cycle to accommodate other observing priorities. Solar Zenith Angle, Albedo, Cloud Only retain when Solar Zenith Angle (SZA) < 85° Spectral Albedo Values from MODTRAN AVHRR* 1°x1° surface types *Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer GEOS-5 Cloud Fraction 0.5x0.67 0 1 Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) depends on surface albedo. Nadir XCO2 retrievals over ocean, sea-ice and old snow are assumed unlikely. Used GOSAT v2.0 averaging kernels for each surface type. Comparison of observations per 1°x1° No observations over snow Obs over seasonal snow included* Number of observations per month Post-filtered GOSAT mean simulated obs per month: 13031(no snow) and 14973 (snow) st 14393 (NIES v2, 1 year of mission) *Precision of obs over snow degraded by a factor of 2 Summary of Key Findings flux TgC/month 2 CO Mean HEO/LEO uncertainty for 14 Arctic and boreal regions Configuration Obs over Snow Jun – Jul – Aug Annual Yes 0.54 0.69 Optimal No 0.55 0.72 Yes 0.72 0.83 Lite No 0.74 0.79 • PHEOS-FTS offers significant flux uncertainty reductions relative to GOSAT with the largest gain in the summer • Largest interannual variability, uncertainty and potential for change to Arctic/boreal carbon cycle (forest disturbances and permafrost thaw) is in the summer, when PHEOS-FTS offers the greatest potential constraints CO2 and CH4 Validation • Validation of column-average CO and CH mole fractions 2 4 ● (XCO , XCH ) requires ● 2 4 ● column measurements by ● ●● ground-based remote sensing ●● ● ●● • The Total Carbon Column Observing Network (TCCON) ● ● is the only widely accepted method • TCCON instrumentation and ● ● retrievals are standardized ● ● ● and data are calibrated to the WMO scale by in situ profile measurements from aircraft TCCON stations in the NH (white dots) overflights Cross Validation for GEO Missions LEO, GEO and HEO missions could be used to validate each other, but sun-synchronous LEO only give one point in the diurnal cycle. HEO can be compared with GEO FORs that do not overlap. PHEOS-FTS Balloon Demonstrator • Test PHEOS-FTS design readiness for CO / CH 2 4 * NEXT TALK * imaging, pointing stability/control over 100 s scan from a high altitude balloon launched from CNES-CSA balloon facility in Timmins, Canada (48.6°N, 81.4°W) Credit: CSA .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Analysis of Perturbations and Station-Keeping Requirements in Highly-Inclined Geosynchronous Orbits
    ANALYSIS OF PERTURBATIONS AND STATION-KEEPING REQUIREMENTS IN HIGHLY-INCLINED GEOSYNCHRONOUS ORBITS Elena Fantino(1), Roberto Flores(2), Alessio Di Salvo(3), and Marilena Di Carlo(4) (1)Space Studies Institute of Catalonia (IEEC), Polytechnic University of Catalonia (UPC), E.T.S.E.I.A.T., Colom 11, 08222 Terrassa (Spain), [email protected] (2)International Center for Numerical Methods in Engineering (CIMNE), Polytechnic University of Catalonia (UPC), Building C1, Campus Norte, UPC, Gran Capitan,´ s/n, 08034 Barcelona (Spain) (3)NEXT Ingegneria dei Sistemi S.p.A., Space Innovation System Unit, Via A. Noale 345/b, 00155 Roma (Italy), [email protected] (4)Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Strathclyde, 75 Montrose Street, Glasgow G1 1XJ (United Kingdom), [email protected] Abstract: There is a demand for communications services at high latitudes that is not well served by conventional geostationary satellites. Alternatives using low-altitude orbits require too large constellations. Other options are the Molniya and Tundra families (critically-inclined, eccentric orbits with the apogee at high latitudes). In this work we have considered derivatives of the Tundra type with different inclinations and eccentricities. By means of a high-precision model of the terrestrial gravity field and the most relevant environmental perturbations, we have studied the evolution of these orbits during a period of two years. The effects of the different perturbations on the constellation ground track (which is more important for coverage than the orbital elements themselves) have been identified. We show that, in order to maintain the ground track unchanged, the most important parameters are the orbital period and the argument of the perigee.
    [Show full text]
  • A Highly Elliptical Orbit Space System for Hydrometeorological Monitoring of the Arctic Region by V
    A highly elliptical orbit space system for hydrometeorological monitoring of the Arctic region by V. V. Asmus1, V. N. Dyadyuchenko2, Y. I. Nosenko3, G. M. Polishchuk4 and V. A. Selin3 The lack of reliable, frequently high latitudes. It has therefore been • Monitoring of climate change updated information on the Earth’s suggested that demonstration of polar ice caps is a signifi cant problem a hydrometeorological system of • Data collection and relay for weather forecasting, affecting satellites on highly elliptical orbit from land-, sea- and air-based forecast skill for the entire planet. The (HEO), called the “Arctica” system, observing platforms poor numerical weather prediction should be created to provide the (NWP) skill for the Arctic region necessary complex information for the • Exchange and dissemination of and the Earth’s northern territories diffi cult tasks involved in developing processed hydrometeorological is caused primarily by errors in the whole Arctic region. and heliogeophysical data. determining initial conditions, which depend on the quality of initial Signifi cantly, the hydrometeorological Further progress in global and data. Until now, initial data have observations carried out in the regional numerical weather prediction been received from meteorological Arctic within the framework of the depends to a large extent on: geostationary satellites, which are International Polar Year 2007-2008 not very effective in scanning high are not provided with remote-sensing • Quasi-continuous reception latitudes and polar-orbiting
    [Show full text]
  • GPS Applications in Space
    Space Situational Awareness 2015: GPS Applications in Space James J. Miller, Deputy Director Policy & Strategic Communications Division May 13, 2015 GPS Extends the Reach of NASA Networks to Enable New Space Ops, Science, and Exploration Apps GPS Relative Navigation is used for Rendezvous to ISS GPS PNT Services Enable: • Attitude Determination: Use of GPS enables some missions to meet their attitude determination requirements, such as ISS • Real-time On-Board Navigation: Enables new methods of spaceflight ops such as rendezvous & docking, station- keeping, precision formation flying, and GEO satellite servicing • Earth Sciences: GPS used as a remote sensing tool supports atmospheric and ionospheric sciences, geodesy, and geodynamics -- from monitoring sea levels and ice melt to measuring the gravity field ESA ATV 1st mission JAXA’s HTV 1st mission Commercial Cargo Resupply to ISS in 2008 to ISS in 2009 (Space-X & Cygnus), 2012+ 2 Growing GPS Uses in Space: Space Operations & Science • NASA strategic navigation requirements for science and 20-Year Worldwide Space Mission space ops continue to grow, especially as higher Projections by Orbit Type* precisions are needed for more complex operations in all space domains 1% 5% Low Earth Orbit • Nearly 60%* of projected worldwide space missions 27% Medium Earth Orbit over the next 20 years will operate in LEO 59% GeoSynchronous Orbit – That is, inside the Terrestrial Service Volume (TSV) 8% Highly Elliptical Orbit Cislunar / Interplanetary • An additional 35%* of these space missions that will operate at higher altitudes will remain at or below GEO – That is, inside the GPS/GNSS Space Service Volume (SSV) Highly Elliptical Orbits**: • In summary, approximately 95% of projected Example: NASA MMS 4- worldwide space missions over the next 20 years will satellite constellation.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Rosen Thesis.Pdf
    THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF AEROSPACE ENGINEERING END OF LIFE DISPOSAL OF SATELLITES IN HIGHLY ELLIPTICAL ORBITS MITCHELL ROSEN SPRING 2019 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a baccalaureate degree in Aerospace Engineering with honors in Aerospace Engineering Reviewed and approved* by the following: Dr. David Spencer Professor of Aerospace Engineering Thesis Supervisor Dr. Mark Maughmer Professor of Aerospace Engineering Honors Adviser * Signatures are on file in the Schreyer Honors College. i ABSTRACT Highly elliptical orbits allow for coverage of large parts of the Earth through a single satellite, simplifying communications in the globe’s northern reaches. These orbits are able to avoid drastic changes to the argument of periapse by using a critical inclination (63.4°) that cancels out the first level of the geopotential forces. However, this allows the next level of geopotential forces to take over, quickly de-orbiting satellites. Thus, a balance between the rate of change of the argument of periapse and the lifetime of the orbit is necessitated. This thesis sets out to find that balance. It is determined that an orbit with an inclination of 62.5° strikes that balance best. While this orbit is optimal off of the critical inclination, it is still near enough that to allow for potential use of inclination changes as a deorbiting method. Satellites are deorbited when the propellant remaining is enough to perform such a maneuver, and nothing more; therefore, the less change in velocity necessary for to deorbit, the better. Following the determination of an ideal highly elliptical orbit, the different methods of inclination change is tested against the usual method for deorbiting a satellite, an apoapse burn to lower the periapse, to find the most propellant- efficient method.
    [Show full text]
  • Nonlinear Filtering for Autonomous Navigation of Spacecraft in Highly Elliptical Orbit
    Nonlinear Filtering for Autonomous Navigation of Spacecraft in Highly Elliptical Orbit by Adam C. Vigneron, B.Sc.(Eng.) A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Affairs in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Applied Science Ottawa-Carleton Institute for Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Carleton University Ottawa, Ontario May, 2014 c Copyright Adam C. Vigneron, 2014 The undersigned hereby recommends to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Affairs acceptance of the thesis Nonlinear Filtering for Autonomous Navigation of Spacecraft in Highly Elliptical Orbit submitted by Adam C. Vigneron, B.Sc.(Eng.) in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Applied Science Professor Anton H. J. de Ruiter, Thesis Supervisor Professor Bruce Burlton, Thesis Co-supervisor Professor Alex Ellery, Thesis Co-supervisor Professor Metin Yaras, Chair, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Ottawa-Carleton Institute for Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Carleton University May, 2014 ii Abstract To fill a gap in satellite services for the Canadian Arctic, the Canadian Space Agency has proposed a Polar Communication and Weather (PCW) mission to be flown in a highly elliptical Molniya orbit. In an era of increasingly capable space hardware, au- tonomous satellite navigation has become a standard means by which satellites in low Earth orbit can increase their independence and functionality. This study examined the accuracy to which autonomous navigation might be realized in a Molniya orbit. Using appropriate physical force models and simulated pseudorange signals from the Global Positioning System (GPS), a navigation algorithm based on the Extended Kalman Filter was demonstrated to achieve a three-dimensional root-mean-square accuracy of 58:9 m over a 500 km ¢ 40 000 km Molniya orbit.
    [Show full text]
  • End-Of-Life Disposal Concepts for Libration Point and Highly Elliptical Orbit Missions
    (Preprint) IAA -AAS -DyCoSS2 -03 -01 END-OF-LIFE DISPOSAL CONCEPTS FOR LIBRATION POINT AND HIGHLY ELLIPTICAL ORBIT MISSIONS Camilla Colombo 1, Francesca Letizia 2, Stefania Soldini 3, Hugh Lewis 4, Elisa Maria Alessi 5, Alessandro Rossi 6, Massimiliano Vasile 7, Massimo Vetrisano 8, Willem Van der Weg 9, Markus Landgraf 10 Libration Point Orbits (LPOs) and Highly Elliptical Orbits (HEOs) are often se- lected for astrophysics and solar terrestrial missions. No guidelines currently ex- ist for their end-of life, however it is a critical aspect to other spacecraft and on- ground safety. This paper presents an analysis of possible disposal strategies for LPO and HEO missions as a result of an ESA study. The dynamical models and the design approach are presented. Five missions are selected: Herschel, Gaia, SOHO as LPOs, and INTEGRAL and XMM-Newton as HEOs. A trade-off is made considering technical feasibility, as well as the sustainability context and the collision probability. INTRODUCTION Libration Point Orbits (LPOs) and Highly Elliptical Orbits (HEOs) are often selected for as- trophysics and solar terrestrial missions as they offer vantage points for the observation of the Earth, the Sun and the Universe. Orbits around L 1 and L 2 are relatively inexpensive to be reached from the Earth and ensure a nearly constant geometry for observation and telecoms, in addition to advantages for thermal system design. On the other hand, HEOs about the Earth guarantee long dwelling times at an altitude outside the Earth’s radiation belt; therefore, long periods of uninter- rupted scientific observation are possible with nearly no background noise from radiations.
    [Show full text]
  • Three-Apogee 16-H Highly Elliptical Orbit As Optimal Choice for Continuous Meteorological Imaging of Polar Regions
    NOVEMBER 2011 T R I S H C H E N K O E T A L . 1407 Three-Apogee 16-h Highly Elliptical Orbit as Optimal Choice for Continuous Meteorological Imaging of Polar Regions ALEXANDER P. TRISHCHENKO* Network Strategy and Design, Meteorological Service of Canada, Environment Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada LOUIS GARAND Data Assimilation and Satellite Meteorology Research, Science and Technology Branch, Environment Canada, Dorval, Quebec, Canada LARISA D. TRICHTCHENKO Canadian Space Weather Forecast Center, Earth Sciences Sector, Natural Resources Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (Manuscript received 18 March 2011, in final form 24 June 2011) ABSTRACT A highly elliptical orbit (HEO) with a 16-h period is proposed for continuous meteorological imaging of polar regions from a two-satellite constellation. This orbit is characterized by three apogees (TAP) separated by 1208. The two satellites are 8 h apart, with repeatable ground track in the course of 2 days. Advantages are highlighted in comparison to the Molniya 12-h orbit described in detail in a previous study (Trishchenko and Garand). Orbital parameters (period, eccentricity, and inclination) are obtained as a result of an optimization process. The principles of orbit optimization are based on the following four key requirements: spatial res- olution (apogee height), the altitude of crossing the trapped proton region at the equator (minimization of radiation doze caused by trapped protons), imaging time over the polar regions, and the stability of the orbit, which is mostly defined by the rotation of perigee. The interplay between these requirements points to a 16-h period with an eccentricity of 0.55 as the optimum solution.
    [Show full text]
  • Artifical Earth-Orbiting Satellites
    Artifical Earth-orbiting satellites László Csurgai-Horváth Department of Broadband Infocommunications and Electromagnetic Theory The first satellites in orbit Sputnik-1(1957) Vostok-1 (1961) Jurij Gagarin Telstar-1 (1962) Kepler orbits Kepler’s laws (Johannes Kepler, 1571-1630) applied for satellites: 1.) The orbit of a satellite around the Earth is an ellipse, one focus of which coincides with the center of the Earth. 2.) The radius vector from the Earth’s center to the satellite sweeps over equal areas in equal time intervals. 3.) The squares of the orbital periods of two satellites are proportional to the cubes of their semi-major axis: a3/T2 is equal for all satellites (MEO) Kepler orbits: equatorial coordinates The Keplerian elements: uniquely describe the location and velocity of the satellite at any given point in time using equatorial coordinates r = (x, y, z) (to solve the equation of Newton’s law for gravity for a two-body problem) Z Y Elements: X Vernal equinox: a Semi-major axis : direction to the Sun at the beginning of spring e Eccentricity (length of day==length of night) i Inclination Ω Longitude of the ascending node (South to North crossing) ω Argument of perigee M Mean anomaly (angle difference of a fictitious circular vs. true elliptical orbit) Earth-centered orbits Sidereal time: Earth rotation vs. fixed stars One sidereal (astronomical) day: one complete Earth rotation around its axis (~4min shorter than a normal day) Coordinated universal time (UTC): - derived from atomic clocks Ground track of a satellite in low Earth orbit: Perturbations 1. The Earth’s radius at the poles are 20km smaller (flattening) The effects of the Earth's atmosphere Gravitational perturbations caused by the Sun and Moon Other: .
    [Show full text]
  • Long-Term Evolution of Highly-Elliptical Orbits: Luni-Solar Perturbation Effects for Stability and Re-Entry
    ORIGINAL RESEARCH published: 02 July 2019 doi: 10.3389/fspas.2019.00034 Long-Term Evolution of Highly-Elliptical Orbits: Luni-Solar Perturbation Effects for Stability and Re-entry Camilla Colombo* Department of Aerospace Science and Technology, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy This paper investigates the long-term evolution of spacecraft in Highly Elliptical Orbits (HEOs). The single averaged disturbing potential due to luni-solar perturbations, zonal harmonics of the Earth gravity field is written in mean Keplerian elements. The double averaged potential is also derived in the Earth-centered equatorial system. Maps of long-term orbit evolution are constructed by measuring the maximum variation of the orbit eccentricity to identify conditions for quasi-frozen, long-lived libration orbits, or initial orbit Edited by: conditions that naturally evolve toward re-entry in the Earth’s atmosphere. The behavior Josep Masdemont, Universitat Politecnica de of these long-term orbit maps is studied for increasing values of the initial orbit inclination Catalunya, Spain and argument of the perigee with respect to the Moon’s orbital plane. In addition, to allow Reviewed by: meeting specific mission constraints, quasi-frozen orbits can be selected as graveyard Eduard D. Kuznetsov, orbits for the end-of-life of HEO missions, in the case re-entry option cannot be achieved Ural Federal University, Russia Catalin Bogdan Gales, due to propellant constraints. On the opposite side, unstable conditions can be exploited Alexandru Ioan Cuza to target Earth re-entry
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary of Terms
    Glossary of Terms Near-Earth Object (NEO): An asteroid or comet with a perihelion distance less than or equal to 1.3 AU. 99% of NEOs are asteroids. Ecliptic plane: Plane of the Earth’s orBit. Orbital parameters: 6 parameters that completely define an object’s orbit: Semi-major axis (a): One half of the major axis of the elliptical orBit; also the mean distance from the Sun. Eccentricity (e): A measure of the ellipticity of the orbit; e = 0 for a circular orBit, e is nearly 1 for a highly elliptical orbit. Inclination (i): Angle between the orbit plane and the ecliptic plane, Longitude of the ascending node (Ω): Angle in the ecliptic plane between the inertial-frame x- axis and the line through the ascending node. Argument of perihelion (ω): Angle in the orbit plane between the ascending node and the perihelion point. True anomaly (ν): Angle in the orbit plane between the perihelion point and the position of the orbiting object. Line of nodes: The line of intersection Between the orBit plane and the plane of the ecliptic (the Earth’s orBit plane). (Not defined if orbit lies exactly in the plane of the ecliptic.) Nodal points: The two points at which an orBit crosses through the ecliptic. The potential impact occurs at one of these points. Ascending node: Point on the orBit where the oBject “ascends” through the ecliptic plane, passing from below it to aBove it. Descending node: Point on the orBit where the oBject “descends” through the ecliptic plane, passing from above it to below it.
    [Show full text]
  • A Mean Elements Orbit Propagator Program for Highly Elliptical Orbits
    CEAS Space Journal manuscript No. (will be inserted by the editor) HEOSAT: A mean elements orbit propagator program for Highly Elliptical Orbits Martin Lara · Juan F. San-Juan · Denis Hautesserres CEAS Space Journal (ISSN: 1868-2502, ESSN: 1868-2510) (2018) doi:10.1007/s12567-017-0152-x (Pre-print version) Abstract The algorithms used in the construction of a semi- intermediary solutions to the J2 problem [34,11], the contin- analytical propagator for the long-term propagation of High- uous increase in the accuracy of observations demanded the ly Elliptical Orbits (HEO) are described. The software prop- use of more complex dynamical models to achieve a sim- agates mean elements and include the main gravitational and ilar precision in the orbit predictions. In particular higher non-gravitational effects that may affect common HEO or- degrees in the Legendre polynomials expansion of the third- bits, as, for instance, geostationary transfer orbits or Mol- body disturbing function are commonly required (see [17, niya orbits. Comparisons with numerical integration show 24], for instance). Useful analytical theories needed to deal that it provides good results even in extreme orbital config- with a growing number of effects, a fact that made that the urations, as the case of SymbolX. trigonometric series evaluated by the theory comprised tens of thousands of terms [5]. Keywords HEO · Geopotential · third-body perturbation · In an epoch of computational plenty, the vast possibili- tesseral resonances · SRP · atmospheric drag · mean ties offered by special perturbation methods clearly surpass elements · semi-analytic propagation those of general perturbation methods in their traditional application to orbit propagation.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Techniques to Study the Dynamic of Highly Elliptical Orbits
    SF2A 2011 G. Alecian, K. Belkacem, R. Samadi and D. Valls-Gabaud (eds) DEVELOPMENT OF TECHNIQUES TO STUDY THE DYNAMIC OF HIGHLY ELLIPTICAL ORBITS G. Lion1 and G. M´etris1 Abstract. Many spacecrafts are or will be placed in highly eccentric orbits around telluric planets of the Solar system. Such eccentricities allow to cover a wide range of altitudes, mainly for planetology purposes. There are also orbits with very high eccentricity around the Earth, especially the GTO (Geostationary Transfer Orbit) and orbits of some space debris. In this case, the motion is strongly perturbed by the luni- solar attraction. For various reasons which will be recalled, the traditional tools of celestial mechanics are not well adapted to the particular dynamic of highly eccentric orbits. Therefore, it is necessary to develop specific techniques for this configuration. This concerns numerical as well as analytical tools. We will show how to construct the expression of the disturbing function due to the presence of an external body, well- suited for highly eccentric orbits. Expansion of the elliptic motion in closed-form by using Fourier series in multiple of the eccentric anomaly will be presented. On the other hand, classical methods of numerical integration have often a poor efficiency. We will show the interest of geometric integrators and in particular the variational integrators. Keywords: Third-body, disturbing function, Hansen-like coefficients, elliptic motion, high eccentricity, closed-form, variational integrators 1 Introduction When dealing with highly elliptical orbits, we have to face several difficulties. Due to the fact that such orbits cover a wide range of altitudes, the hierarchy of the perturbations acting on the satellite changes with the position on the orbit.
    [Show full text]