DOCSLIB.ORG

Western Port Ramsar Wetland: Ecological Character Description

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Western Port Ramsar Wetland: Ecological Character Description Western Port Ramsar Wetland Ecological Character Description Image credits: Y. Baker Citation Kellogg Brown & Root, 2010, Western Port Ramsar Wetland Ecological Character Description. Report for Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities, Canberra. Acknowledgments Contributions from the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities and the Western Port Ramsar Site Steering Committee, including Dr. Graham Mitchell, Simon Godschalx, Yvette Baker, Emmaline Froggatt, Scott Coutts, Mark Rodrigue, Andrea Delaney, and Xenia Dennett. In-kind contributions from David Ball (DPI), Richard Loyn and Birgita Hansen (ARI), Andy Longmore (DPI), Neil Saintilan and Kerrylee Rogers. Limitations Statement The sole purpose of this report and the associated services performed by Kellogg Brown & Root Pty Ltd (KBR) is to prepare an ecological character description for the Western Port Ramsar site in accordance with the scope of services set out in the contract between KBR and Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities(‘the Client’). That scope of services was defined by the requests of the Client, by the time and budgetary constraints imposed by the Client, and by the availability of access to the site. KBR derived the data in this report primarily from literature available in the public domain and additional information provided by both the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities and the Western Port Steering Committee. The passage of time, manifestation of latent conditions or impacts of future events may require further exploration at the site and subsequent data analysis, and re-evaluation of the findings, observations and conclusions expressed in this report. In preparing this report, KBR has relied upon and presumed accurate certain information (or absence thereof) relative to the site provided by government officials and authorities, the Client and others identified herein. Except as otherwise stated in the report, KBR has not attempted to verify the accuracy or completeness of any such information. No warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied, is made with respect to the data reported or to the findings, observations and conclusions expressed in this report. Further, such data, findings, observations and conclusions are based solely upon information available in the public domain and additional information provided by both the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities and the Western Port Steering Committee in existence at the time of the investigation. This report has been prepared on behalf of and for the exclusive use of the Client, and is subject to and issued in connection with the provisions of the agreement between KBR and the Client. KBR accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for or in respect of any use of or reliance upon this report by any third party. Disclaimer The views and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Australian Government or the Minister for Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities or the Administrative Authority for Ramsar in Australia. While reasonable efforts have been made to ensure the contents of this publication are factually correct, the Commonwealth does not accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the contents, and shall not be liable for any loss or damage that may be occasioned directly or indirectly through the use of, or reliance on, the contents of this publication. Guidance on the development of Ecological Character Descriptions, including Limits of Acceptable change, are areas of active policy development. Accordingly there may be differences in the type of information contained in this Ecological Character Description, to those of other Ramsar wetlands. This information does not create a policy position to be applied in statutory decision making. Further it does not provide assessment of any particular action within the meaning of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999, nor replace the role of the Minister or his delegate in making an informed decision on any action. This report is not a substitute for professional advice rather it is intended to inform professional opinion by providing the authors' assessment of available evidence on change in ecological character. This information is provided without prejudice to any final decision by the Administrative Authority for Ramsar in Australia on change in ecological character in accordance with the requirements of Article 3.2 of the Ramsar Convention. Users should obtain any appropriate professional advice relevant to their particular circumstances. ii SUMMARY viii 5 CHANGES TO ECOLOGICAL CHARACTER SINCE THE TIME OF 1 INTRODUCTION LISTING 1.1 Site location 1-1 1.2 Land tenure and management 5.1 Wetland bathymetry 5-1 responsibilities 1-6 5.2 Water quality 5-1 1.3 Ramsar criteria 1-8 5.3 Geomorphology and sedimentation 5-4 1.4 Wetland types 1-13 5.4 Tidal regime, hydrodynamics and 1.5 Site details 1-14 catchment inflows 5-6 1.6 Statement of purpose 1-15 5.5 Climate 5-7 1.7 Relevant treaties, legislation or 5.6 Flora 5-7 regulations 1-16 5.7 Fauna 5-14 2 CRITICAL COMPONENTS, 6 KNOWLEDGE GAPS PROCESSES, BENEFITS AND SERVICES 7 MONITORING REQUIREMENTS 2.1 Essential elements 2-1 2.2 Critical ecosystem elements 2-10 8 COMMUNICATION, EDUCATION 2.3 Ecosystem components and AND PUBLIC AWARENESS processes 2-10 2.4 Ecosystem benefits and services 2-50 9 REFERENCES 3 LIMITS OF ACCEPTABLE CHANGE 3.1 Wetland bathymetry 3-4 APPENDICES 3.2 Geomorphology and sedimentation 3-4 A Methods used in preparing the description 3.3 Flora—Seagrass 3-5 B Curriculum vitae of authors of the 3.4 Flora—Saltmarsh and mangrove 3-5 description 3.5 Fauna—Waterbirds 3-6 C Ramsar Information Sheet 3.6 Fauna—Marine invertebrates 3-6 D Non-pelagic waterbird species that occur 3.7 Fauna—Fish 3-6 at the Ramsar site classified by guild (Based on BOCA survey data) 4 THREATS TO THE ECOLOGICAL E Common invertebrates found in marine CHARACTER OF THE RAMSAR habitats F Common fish assemblages found in SITE Western Port G Atlas of Victorian Wildlife Records 4.1 Historical site and catchment threatened fauna species historically alterations 4-2 recorded within the Western Port Ramsar 4.2 Catchment and coastal erosion 4-3 site 4.3 Deteriorating water quality 4-4 H Pest species known to occur within the 4.4 Shipping 4-6 Ramsar site 4.5 Recreational activities 4-7 I Total seasonal count separated by species 4.6 Pest plants and animals 4-7 4.7 Climate change 4-9 4.8 Urban development 4-10 4.9 Grazing 4-11 4.10 Recreational and commercial fishing 4-11 iii Glossary Australian height datum The datum used to determine elevations in Australia. The AHD is based on mean (AHD) sea level being zero elevation. East Asian–Australasian The East Asian–Australasian Flyway (the Flyway) stretches from the Russian Far Flyway East and Alaska, southwards through East Asia and South-east Asia, to Australia and New Zealand and encompasses 22 countries. The East Asian–Australasian Flyway is home to over 50 million migratory waterbirds from over 250 different populations, including 28 globally threatened species. (DEWHA, not dated). Benchmark A standard or point of reference (ANZECC and ARMCANZ 2000b). A predetermined state (based on the values that are sought to be protected) to be achieved or maintained (Lambert and Elix 2006). In this ECD, benchmarks are related to the baseline description at the time of listing of a Ramsar site. Benefits Benefits here refer to the economic, social and cultural benefits that people receive from ecosystems (Ramsar Convention 2005a, Resolution IX.1 Annex A). These benefits often rely on the underlying ecological components and processes in the wetland. See also ‘Ecosystem services’. Bioregion A scientifically rigorous determination of regions as established using biological or and physical parameters such as climate, soil type, vegetation cover, etc. (Ramsar Biogeographic region Convention 2005b). Catchment The total area draining into a river, reservoir, or other body of water (ANZECC and ARMCANZ 2000a). Change in ecological Human-induced adverse alteration of any ecosystem component, process, and/or character ecosystem benefit/service (Ramsar Convention 2005a, Resolution IX.1 Annex A). Community An assemblage of organisms characterised by a distinctive combination of species occupying a common environment and interacting with one another (ANZECC and ARMCANZ 2000a). Diversity (biological) The variability among living organisms from all sources, including, inter alia, terrestrial, marine and other aquatic ecosystems and the ecological complexes of which they are part; this includes diversity within species (genetic diversity), between species (species diversity), of ecosystems (ecosystem diversity), and of ecological processes. This definition is based largely on the one contained in Article 2 of the Convention on Biological Diversity (Ramsar Convention 2005b). Ecological character The combination of the ecosystem components, processes, and benefits and services that characterise the wetland at a given point in time. Within this context, ecosystem benefits are defined in accordance with the variety of benefits to people (ecosystem services). The phrase ‘at a given point in time’ refers to Resolution VI.1 paragraph 2.1, which states that ‘It is essential that the ecological
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Reptiles and Amphibians of Otago
    Society for Research on Amphibians and Reptiles in New Zealand (SRARNZ) presents Reptiles and Amphibians of Otago Otago is a large (31,251 km2) and lightly populated region of the southern South Island of Aotearoa New Zealand, stretching from the eastern coastline west to the Southern Alps. The earliest humans, of East Polynesian origin, arrived about 700 years ago. The largest settlement today is the coastal city of Dunedin (pop. >127,000), which grew from a Scottish influx in the 1800s. The Otago Regional Council administers the region, and tribal authority (mana whenua) rests with the iwi of Ngāi Tahu. Climates in the Otago region (roughly 45°– leiopelmatid frogs survive elsewhere in 47°S) range from changeable, cool- New Zealand. Two species of introduced temperate conditions near the coast to frogs are present, but there are no the near-continental climates (baking hot crocodilians, salamanders, terrestrial summers, freezing winters) of the interior. snakes or turtles. Marine turtles (mainly The region provides varied habitats for leatherback turtles, Dermochelys coriacea) herp species, including sand-dunes, visit the coastal waters of Otago but do grasslands, shrublands, wetlands, forests, not nest here. rock structures and scree slopes, some occupied to at least 1900 m above sea level. Today’s herpetofauna is dominated by lizards (solely geckos and skinks), including about 10 described species. A further 12 or more undescribed taxa are recognised Otago by tag names for conservation purposes, and we follow that approach here. All lizards in Otago are viviparous and long- lived, and remain vulnerable to ongoing habitat loss and predation by introduced mammals.
    [Show full text]
  • Middle Island Little Penguin Monitoring Program 2015-16 Season Report
    Middle Island Little Penguin Monitoring Program 2015-16 Season Report By Jess Bourchier & Lauren Kivisalu 2016 Project Partners: Middle Island Little Penguin Monitoring 2015-16 Season Report Citation Bourchier J. and L. Kivisalu (2016) Middle Island Little Penguin Monitoring Program 2015-16 Season Report. Report to Warrnambool Coastcare Landcare Group. NGT Consulting – Nature Glenelg Trust, Mount Gambier, South Australia. Correspondence in relation to this report contact Ms Jess Bourchier Project Ecologist NGT Consulting (08) 8797 8596 [email protected] Cover photos (left to right): Volunteers crossing to Middle Island (J Bourchier), Maremma Guardian Dog on Middle Island (M Wells), Sunset from Middle Island (J Bourchier), 2-3 week old Little Penguin chick (J Bourchier), 7 week old Little Penguin chick (J Bourchier) Disclaimer This report was commissioned by Warrnambool Coastcare Landcare. Although all efforts were made to ensure quality, it was based on the best information available at the time and no warranty express or implied is provided for any errors or omissions, nor in the event of its use for any other purposes or by any other parties. Page ii of 22 Middle Island Little Penguin Monitoring 2015-16 Season Report Acknowledgements We would like to acknowledge and thank the following people and funding bodies for their assistance during the monitoring program: • Warrnambool Coastcare Landcare Network (WCLN), in particular Louise Arthur, Little Penguin Officer. • Little Penguin Monitoring Program volunteers, with particular thanks to Louise Arthur Melanie Wells, John Sutherlands and Vince Haberfield. • Middle Island Project Working Group, which includes representatives from WCLN, Warrnambool City Council, Deakin University, Department of Environment, Land Water and Planning (DELWP).
    [Show full text]
  • Disaggregation of Bird Families Listed on Cms Appendix Ii
    Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals 2nd Meeting of the Sessional Committee of the CMS Scientific Council (ScC-SC2) Bonn, Germany, 10 – 14 July 2017 UNEP/CMS/ScC-SC2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II (Prepared by the Appointed Councillors for Birds) Summary: The first meeting of the Sessional Committee of the Scientific Council identified the adoption of a new standard reference for avian taxonomy as an opportunity to disaggregate the higher-level taxa listed on Appendix II and to identify those that are considered to be migratory species and that have an unfavourable conservation status. The current paper presents an initial analysis of the higher-level disaggregation using the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World Volumes 1 and 2 taxonomy, and identifies the challenges in completing the analysis to identify all of the migratory species and the corresponding Range States. The document has been prepared by the COP Appointed Scientific Councilors for Birds. This is a supplementary paper to COP document UNEP/CMS/COP12/Doc.25.3 on Taxonomy and Nomenclature UNEP/CMS/ScC-Sc2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II 1. Through Resolution 11.19, the Conference of Parties adopted as the standard reference for bird taxonomy and nomenclature for Non-Passerine species the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World, Volume 1: Non-Passerines, by Josep del Hoyo and Nigel J. Collar (2014); 2.
    [Show full text]
  • DIET and ASPECTS of FAIRY PRIONS BREEDING at SOUTH GEORGIA by P.A
    DIET AND ASPECTS OF FAIRY PRIONS BREEDING AT SOUTH GEORGIA By P.A. PRINCE AND P.G. COPESTAKE ABSTRACT A subantarctic population of the Fairy Prion (Pachyprzla turtur) was studied at South Georgia in 1982-83. Full measurements of breeding birds are given, together with details of breeding habitat, the timing of the main breeding cycle events, and chick growth (weight and wing, culmen and tarsus length). Regurgitated food samples showed the diet to be mainly Crustacea (96% by weight), fish and squid comprising the rest. Of crustaceans, Antarctic krill made up 38% of items and 80% by weight. Copepods (four species, mostly Rhincalanus gigas) made up 39% of items but only 4% by weight; amphipods [three species, principally Themisto gaudichaudii made up 22% of items and 16% by weight. Diet and frequency of chick feeding are compared with those of Antarctic Prions and Blue Petrels at the same site; Fairy Prions are essentially intermediate. INTRODUCTION The Fairy Prion (Pachyptila turtur) is one of six members of a genus confined to the temperate and subantarctic regions of the Southern Hemisphere. With the Fulmar Prion (P. crassirostris), it forms the subgenus Pseudoprion. Its main area of breeding distribution is between the Antarctic Polar Front and the Subtropical Convergence. It is widespread in the New Zealand region, from the north of the North Island south to the Antipodes Islands and Macquarie Island, where only about 40 pairs survive (Brothers 1984). Although widespread in the Indian Ocean at the Prince Edward, Crozet and Kerguelen Islands, in the South Atlantic Ocean it is known to breed only on Beauchene Island (Falkland Islands) (Strange 1968, Smith & Prince 1985) and South Georgia (Prince & Croxall 1983).
    [Show full text]
  • Observations on Some Tasmanian Fishes: Part Ix
    PAPERS AND PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF TASMANIA, VOLUME 94 OBSERVATIONS ON SOME TASMANIAN FISHES: PART IX By E. O. G. SCOTT One text figure ABSTRACT West Coast '. Again, Bridport, Lat. 41 0 01' S., Long. A case of mass mortality in Navodon setosus 147 0 23' E., and st. Helens, Lat. 41 0 20' S., Long. (Waite), 1899 [Aluteridae], a species now first 148 0 14' E., are approximately equidistant-west­ formally recorded from Tasmania, is reported: ward, southward, respectively-from Cape Port­ land; yet the former is a 'North East Coast', the some features of two juveniles are described and 0 figured. Taxonomic data on Mitotichthys tuckeri latter an 'East Coast " town: Stanley, Lat. 40 (Scott), 1942 [Syngnathidae], hitherto known 47' S., Long. 145 0 19' E., which stands in about the only from the holotype, are extended by an account same relation to Cape Grim as Bridport does to of two virtual topotypes. Miscellaneous observations Cape Portland, belongs to the' Far North West '. are made on Stigmatopora argus (Richardson), Entries in tables of synonymy, particularly 1840 [Syngnathidae] (status of several species citations from the earlier authors, are not neces­ commonly reduced to synonymy); Lampris regius sarily identical with the originals in point of typo­ (Bonnaterre), 1788 [Lampridae] (third Tasmanian graphical detail (earlier employment of initial record; dimensions) ; Dactylosargus arctidens capitals for some trivial names; no general, cr (Richardson), 1839 [Aplodactylidae] (differences indescriminate use of parentheses; and so on); from published accounts and figures; general being rendered in a standard pattern in accord observations); Lepidopus caudatus Euphrasen), with contemporary conventions.
    [Show full text]
  • Locals' Delicious
    Sentinel-TimesTUESDAY, MAY 26, 2020 COVERING SOUTH GIPPSLAND AND BASS COAST Huge Island cash grab – See inside Locals’ delicious Kardella-based beef farmers Josh Butt and Jyoti Blencowe won their first major industry award last week, when they produce were named among the state’s top ‘paddock’ producers. SEVERAL South Gippsland Rob Monk shared in the glory practitioners in Melbourne through Melbourne-based spe- producers have been recog- in the dairy category, with milk alongside running the farm, the ciality butchers, Meatsmith, nised in the 2020 Delicious from his Fleckvieh herd form- husband and wife team were but Josh said the award may Awards, a celebration of new, ing the basis of a prizewin- encouraged to be included in provide the push they’ve need- innovative, and consistently ning fresh lactic curd cow’s the esteemed list of Delicious ed to explore local and online outstanding Australian ingre- milk cheese from the West award winners, despite their retail options. dients. Gippsland-based Butterfly Fac- unusual take on beef produc- “We’re still in the early stages With prizes for each state’s tory. tion, centred on fattening up and selling directly would be top producers across four cat- Kardella-based beef produc- retired dairy cattle, which has a big step up in the amount egories, Corner Inlet fisher- ers Josh Butt and Jyoti Blen- “been met with many a raised of time and work involved, so man and last year’s ‘Producer cowe took out a gong in the eyebrow”. we’re taking it slowly for now,” of the Year’ Bruce Collis was ‘Paddock’ category, their first “It’s good to know that in a he said.
    [Show full text]
  • Wetlands Australia
    Wetlands Australia National wetlands update August 2014—Issue No 25 Disclaimer The views and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Australian Government or the Minister for the Environment. © Copyright Commonwealth of Australia, 2014 Wetlands Australia National Wetlands Update August 2014 – Issue No 25 is licensed by the Commonwealth of Australia for use under a Creative Commons By Attribution 3.0 Australia licence with the exception of the Coat of Arms of the Commonwealth of Australia, the logo of the agency responsible for publishing the report, content supplied by third parties, and any images depicting people. For licence conditions see: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au This report should be attributed as ‘Wetlands Australia National Wetlands Update August 2015 – Issue No 25, Commonwealth of Australia 2014’ The Commonwealth of Australia has made all reasonable efforts to identify content supplied by third parties using the following format ‘© Copyright, [name of third party] ’. Cover images Front cover: Wetlands provide important habitats for waterbirds, such as this adult great egret (Ardea modesta) at Leichhardt Lagoon in Queensland (© Copyright, Brian Furby) Back cover: Inland wetlands, like Narran Lakes Nature Reserve Ramsar site in New South Wales, support high numbers of waterbird breeding and provide refuge for birds during droughts (© Copyright, Dragi Markovic) ii / Wetlands Australia August 2014 Contents Introduction to Wetlands Australia August
    [Show full text]
  • Bird Vulnerability Assessments
    Assessing the vulnerability of native vertebrate fauna under climate change, to inform wetland and floodplain management of the River Murray in South Australia: Bird Vulnerability Assessments Attachment (2) to the Final Report June 2011 Citation: Gonzalez, D., Scott, A. & Miles, M. (2011) Bird vulnerability assessments- Attachment (2) to ‘Assessing the vulnerability of native vertebrate fauna under climate change to inform wetland and floodplain management of the River Murray in South Australia’. Report prepared for the South Australian Murray-Darling Basin Natural Resources Management Board. For further information please contact: Department of Environment and Natural Resources Phone Information Line (08) 8204 1910, or see SA White Pages for your local Department of Environment and Natural Resources office. Online information available at: http://www.environment.sa.gov.au Permissive Licence © State of South Australia through the Department of Environment and Natural Resources. You may copy, distribute, display, download and otherwise freely deal with this publication for any purpose subject to the conditions that you (1) attribute the Department as the copyright owner of this publication and that (2) you obtain the prior written consent of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources if you wish to modify the work or offer the publication for sale or otherwise use it or any part of it for a commercial purpose. Written requests for permission should be addressed to: Design and Production Manager Department of Environment and Natural Resources GPO Box 1047 Adelaide SA 5001 Disclaimer While reasonable efforts have been made to ensure the contents of this publication are factually correct, the Department of Environment and Natural Resources makes no representations and accepts no responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or fitness for any particular purpose of the contents, and shall not be liable for any loss or damage that may be occasioned directly or indirectly through the use of or reliance on the contents of this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • A Year on the Vasse-Wonnerup Wetlands
    Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development Department of Water and Environmental Regulation A Year on the Vasse-Wonnerup Wetlands An Ecological Snapshot March 2017—January 2018 W IN N T M E U R T U A S P R R I N E G M M U S Musk duck (Biziura lobata) (Photo: Mark Oliver) The Vasse-Wonnerup Wetlands The conservation values of the Vasse-Wonnerup wetlands are recognised on a local, state, national and international level. The wetlands provide habitat to thousands of Australian and migratory water birds as well as supporting the largest breeding population of black swans in the state. In 1990 the wetlands were recognised as a ‘Wetland of International Importance’ under the Ramsar Convention. The wetlands are also one of the most nutrient enriched wetlands in Western Australia, characterised by extensive macroalgae and phytoplankton blooms and occasional major fish kills. Poor water quality in the wetlands is a major concern for the local community. Over the past four years scientists have been working together to investigate options to improve water quality in the wetlands by monitoring seawater inflows through the Vasse surge barrier and modelling options to increase water levels and flows into the Vasse estuary. These trials have successfully shown that seawater inflows can reduce the incidence of harmful phytoplankton blooms and improve conditions for fish in the Vasse Estuary Channel over summer months. What isn’t as well understood is how these management approaches and subsequent increased water levels may impact on the broader wetland system, especially how the ecology of the wetlands responds to changes in the timing and volume of seawater inflow through the surge barriers.
    [Show full text]
  • A Classification of the Rallidae
    A CLASSIFICATION OF THE RALLIDAE STARRY L. OLSON HE family Rallidae, containing over 150 living or recently extinct species T and having one of the widest distributions of any family of terrestrial vertebrates, has, in proportion to its size and interest, received less study than perhaps any other major group of birds. The only two attempts at a classifi- cation of all of the recent rallid genera are those of Sharpe (1894) and Peters (1934). Although each of these lists has some merit, neither is satisfactory in reflecting relationships between the genera and both often separate closely related groups. In the past, no attempt has been made to identify the more primitive members of the Rallidae or to illuminate evolutionary trends in the family. Lists almost invariably begin with the genus Rdus which is actually one of the most specialized genera of the family and does not represent an ancestral or primitive stock. One of the difficulties of rallid taxonomy arises from the relative homo- geneity of the family, rails for the most part being rather generalized birds with few groups having morphological modifications that clearly define them. As a consequence, particularly well-marked genera have been elevated to subfamily rank on the basis of characters that in more diverse families would not be considered as significant. Another weakness of former classifications of the family arose from what Mayr (194933) referred to as the “instability of the morphology of rails.” This “instability of morphology,” while seeming to belie what I have just said about homogeneity, refers only to the characteristics associated with flightlessness-a condition that appears with great regularity in island rails and which has evolved many times.
    [Show full text]
  • CHURCHILL ISLAND We Hope You Enjoy the Tranquillity and History of This Special Island
    WELCOME TO CHURCHILL ISLAND We hope you enjoy the tranquillity and history of this special island. First used by Indigenous people, the island later became the first farmed site in Victoria. to walk track DAILY ACTIVITIES No Entry Services Area • 1.00pm – 1.45pm Horse Wagon rides* Cocky Blacksmsmiith Works Shop Weekends, School & Public Holidays – Weath- Toilets Shop er Permitting • 2.10pm Shearing Car Park Whip Shed Cow milking Wash Cracking O Please note that p House o r • D 2.30pm we have had to change h c a Machinery o Sheep shearingour farm activities due C Visitor Cow Milking Shed to physical distancing Centre • Stables 2.45pm requirements and to keep Herrb Whip cracking Garrden Rogerrss Animal our visitors safe. Cottttagess Nursery Amess House Hay Shed • 3.05pm Please refer to Working dogs www.penguins.org.au Kiittchen Gardrden for updated details of • 3.20pm available activities. Sheep shearing Weather permitting Working Dogs ALL DAY ACTIVITIES to walk Orchard track • Animal nursery Chooks Map not to scale • Gift shop • Café open from Lavender 10am - 5pm Monday to Friday Garden 9am - 5pm Saturdays Wagon Rides Please call (03) 5951 2830 for more details or check out www.penguins.org.au Help the environment – please return map to front desk if you don’t want to keep it. NORTH POINT The northern most point of Churchill Island CHURCHILL ISLAND is a good place to see OLD MOONAHS bird life, especially WALKS at low tide when the The gnarled trees with trunks that BASALT BEDROCK mud flats are revealed. The circuit track offers look like twisted rope are Moonahs.
    [Show full text]
  • BESS) Detailed Ecology Assessment Tilt Renewables Reference: 509891 Revision: 2 2021-02-22
    Latrobe Valley Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) Detailed Ecology assessment Tilt Renewables Reference: 509891 Revision: 2 2021-02-22 Document control record Document prepared by: Aurecon Australasia Pty Ltd ABN 54 005 139 873 Aurecon Centre Level 8, 850 Collins Street Docklands, Melbourne VIC 3008 PO Box 23061 Docklands VIC 8012 Australia T +61 3 9975 3000 F +61 3 9975 3444 E [email protected] W aurecongroup.com A person using Aurecon documents or data accepts the risk of: a) Using the documents or data in electronic form without requesting and checking them for accuracy against the original hard copy version. b) Using the documents or data for any purpose not agreed to in writing by Aurecon. Document control Report title Detailed Ecology assessment Document code Project number 509891 File path Client Tilt Renewables Client contact Client reference Rev Date Revision Author Reviewer Verifier Approver details/status (if required) 0 2021-01-14 First Draft Justin Sullivan Brett Taylor Brett Taylor Greta Thraves 1 2021-02-04 Revised report to Justin Sullivan Greta Thraves respond to client comments 2 2021-02-22 Revised report to Justin Sullivan Greta Thraves respond to client comments Current revision 2 Approval Author signature Approver signature Name Justin Sullivan Name Greta Thraves Title Senior Consultant Title Manager, Planning and (Ecologist) Environment Project number 509891 File Latrobe Valley BESS – Detailed Ecology Assessment, 2021-02-22 Revision 2 ii Executive summary Aurecon was commissioned by Tilt Renewables (the Proponent) to undertake an ecological assessment to inform the design and planning approvals for a proposed Latrobe Valley Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) at Morwell in eastern Victoria (the Project).
    [Show full text]