DOCSLIB.ORG

Evansville-Dutch Mills Road Bridge Other Names/Site Number Bridge # 17383 I Site# WA0967

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Evansville-Dutch Mills Road Bridge Other Names/Site Number Bridge # 17383 I Site# WA0967 NPS Form I 0-900 OMB No. 10024-0018 (Oct. 1990) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin l 6A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/ A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property historic name Evansville-Dutch Mills Road Bridge other names/site number Bridge # 17383 I Site# WA0967 2. Location street & number South Dutch Mills Road/County Road 464 D not for publication city or town Dutch Mills D vicinity state Arkansas code AR county Washington code 143 zip code 72729 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this 181 nomination D request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set for in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property 181 meets D does not meet the National Register criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant D nationally D statewide 181 locally. (See continuation sheet for additional comments.) Signature of certifying official!fitle Date Arkansas Historic Preservation Program State or Federal agency and bureau In my opinion, the property D meets D does not meet the National Register criteria. CD See Continuation sheet for additional comments.) Signature of certifying official/Title Date State or Federal agency and bureau 4. National Park Service Certification I hereby certify that the property is: Signature of the Keeper Date of Action D entered in the National Register. D See continuation sheet D determined eligible for the National Register. D See continuation sheet D determined not eligible for the National Register. D removed from the National Register. D other, (explain:) Evansville-Dutch Mills Road Bridge Washington County, Arkansas Name of Property County and State 5. Classification Ownership of Property Category of Property Number of Resources within Property (Check as many boxes as apply) (Check only one box) (Do not include previously listed resources in count.) D private D building(s) Contributing Noncontributing ~ public-local D district D public-State D site buildings D public-Federal ~ structure sites D object structures objects Total Name of related multiple property listing Number of Contributing resources previously listed (Enter "N/ A" if property is not part of a multiple property listing.) in the National Register Historic Bridges of Arkansas 6. Function or Use Historic Functions Current Functions (Enter categories from instructions) (Enter categories from instructions) TRANSPORT A TI ON/Road-Related/Bridge TRANSPORTATION/Road-Related/Bridge 7. Descri tion Architectural Classification Materials (Enter categories from instructions) (Enter categories from instructions) Otherlclosed-spandrel concrete arch deck foundation Concrete, reinforced walls NIA ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~- roof NIA ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ other Concrete, reinforced/Earth Narrative Description (Describe the historic and current condition of the property on one or more continuation sheets.) Evansville-Dutch Mills Road Bridge Washington County, Arkansas Name of Property County and State 8. Statement of Significance Applicable National Register Criteria Levels of Significance (local, state, national) (Mark "x" in one or more boxes for the criteria qualifying the property Local for National Register listing.) ~ A Property is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of Areas of Significance (Enter categories from instructions) our history. Engineering Transportation D B Property is associated with the lives of persons significant in our past. ~ C Property embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic values, or represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components lack Period of Significance individual distinction. 1936-1958 D D Property has yielded, or is likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. Criteria Considerations Significant Dates (Mark "x" in all the boxes that apply.) 1936 Property is: D A owned by a religious institution or used for religious purposes. Significant Person (Complete if Criterion Bis marked) D B. removed from its original location. D C. birthplace or grave of a historical figure of outstanding importance. Cultural Affiliation (Complete if Criterion Dis marked) D D a cemetery. D E a reconstructed building, object, or structure. D F a commemorative property ArchitectJBuilder D G less than 50 years of age or achieved significance Luten Bridge Company of Little Rock, AR within the past 50 years. Narrative Statement of Significance (Explain the significance of the property on one or more continuation sheets.) 9. Major Bibliographical References Bibliography (Cite the books, articles, and other sources used in preparing this form on one or more continuation sheets.) Previous documentation on file (NPS): Primary location of additional data: D preliminary determination of individual listing (36 ~ State Historic Preservation Office CFR 67) has been requested D Other State Agency D previously listed in the National Register D Federal Agency D Previously determined eligible by the National ~ Local Government Register D University D designated a National Historic Landmark D Other D recorded by Historic American Buildings Survey Name of repository: # Washington County Archives, Fayetteville, AR D recorded by Historic American Engineering Record# Evansville-Dutch Mills Road Bridge Washington County, Arkansas Name of Property County and State 10. Geographical Data Acreage of Property Less than one UTM References (Place additional UTM references on a continuation sheet.) 15 364597 3969842 3 Zone Easting Northing Zone Easting Northing 2 4 D See continuation sheet Verbal Boundary Description (Describe the boundaries of the property on a continuation sheet.) Boundary Justification (Explain why the boundaries were selected on a continuation sheet.) 11. Form Prepared By name/title Van Zbinden, National Register Historian organization Arkansas Historic Preservation Program date 21 September 2007 street & number 1500 Tower Building, 323 Center Street telephone 501.324.9880 city or town Little Rock state AR zip code 72201 Additional Documentation Submit the following items with the completed form: Continuation Sheets Maps A USGS map (7.5 or 15 minute series) indicating the property's location A Sketch map for historic districts and properties having large acreage or numerous resources. Photographs Representative black and white photographs of the property. Additional items (Check with the SHPO or FPO for any additional items.) Property Owner (Complete this item at the request ofSHPO or FPO.) name Washington County, Judge Jerry Hunton street & number 280 North College Street, Suite 500 telephone 479.444.1700 city or town Fayetteville state AR zip code 72701 Paperwork Reduction Act Statement: This information is being collected for applications to the National Register of Historic Places to nominate properties for listing or determine eligibility for listing, to list properties, and to amend existing listing. Response to this request is required to obtain a benefit in accordance with the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. 470 et seq.) Estimated Burden Statement: Public reporting burden for this form is estimated to average 18. l hours per response including time for reviewing instructions, gathering and maintaining data, and completing and reviewing the form. Direct comments regarding this burden estimate or any aspect of this form to the Chief, Administrative Services Division, National Park Service, P. 0. Box 37127, Washington, DC 20013-7127; and the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reductions Projects (1024-0018), Washington, DC 20303. ....--------------------------------- Evansville-Dutch Mills Road Bridge Washington County, Arkansas Name of Property County and State United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section number 7 Page 1 ~~~ -~~- Summary Evansville-Dutch Mills Road Bridge, Bridge #17383, crosses Whitaker Branch south of the village of Dutch Mills in western Washington County, Arkansas. The bridge is a reinforced concrete, filled-spandrel arch built in 1936. It consists of one span of a total length of approximately thirty (30) feet with a height above water of approximately ten (10) feet. Elaboration Luten Bridge Company of Little Rock, Arkansas, built the reinforced concrete, filled--0r closed-spandrel arch bridge over Whitaker Branch in western Washington County in 1936. The bridge was completed by the Luten Bridge Company
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Responses to Comments in Italics. USEPA Region 6 Comments
    6WQ-EW June 16, 2014 Responses to comments in italics. USEPA Region 6 Comments Applicable to the Van Buren Water Effect Ratio (WER) Work Plans for Both Copper and Zinc 1. Section 1.0 Introduction (and Associated Appendices): We really appreciate the amount of effort that was put into these work plans in terms of characterizing the discharge and receiving stream and evaluating source reduction and treatment options. Section 1.0 of these work plans (and associated appendices) provide an excellent example of the kind of background analysis and evaluation desired for WER work plans. 2. Section 1.1, Options Considered: The second to last sentence of Section 1.1 states the following: “Accordingly, VBMU is proposing the study described herein to provide justification for a site-specific criterion for Cu [and Zn] in the portion of Reach 002 of Lee Creek from Lee Creek Reservoir to the mouth of Lee Creek on the Arkansas River.” Lee Creek Reservoir appears to be located upstream from VBMU’s permitted outfall. It would not be appropriate to apply the site-specific criteria derived from this WER study upstream from the permitted outfall (since the WER study is not designed to represent conditions upstream from the outfall). ADEQ and the facility may wish to consider the following description for where the site- specific criteria would apply: “Lee Creek from the edge of the mixing zone with the Arkansas River upstream to VBMU’s permitted outfall in Crawford County, Arkansas.” The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) has used descriptions similar to this one when describing the stream reaches to which WER- based site-specific criteria apply.
    [Show full text]
  • Lee Creek and Upper Frog Bayou Watershed Management Plans – Phase II 319 Grant Project No
    Lee Creek and Upper Frog Bayou Watershed Management Plans – Phase II 319 Grant Project No. 13-200 Lance McAvoy, Environmental Manager Arkansas Natural Resource Commission 2015 Nonpoint Source Pollution Stakeholder and Project Review Meeting September 24, 2015 Project Overview • Phase I - Recap • Phase II - Scope & Goals • Phase II - Watershed Information • Phase II - Monitoring • Phase II - Unified Stream Assessments • Phase II - Stakeholder Development and Public Education • Phase II - Assessments and Ranking Sub-watershed Implementation Measures • Phase II - WMPs Status • Conclusions & Advice Phase I - Recap • Purpose: o Develop an EPA 9 element WMP for Lee Creek Watershed and Frog Bayou Watershed o Have EPA approve/accept/bless... both WMPs Phase I - Recap • Work Performed: o Data analysis of previous monitoring performed in the watersheds o Storm event sampling o Baseline sampling • Outcome: o EPA did not accept due to no modeling, load reduction values, little stakeholder interaction/education, adaptive management, more data Phase I - Recap • We weren’t surprised • Both plans completed in one (1) year • Phase I looked at the entire Frog Bayou Watershed • Never talked to Oklahoma about Lee Creek • “Overall not a bad plan” • ANRC willing to help with Phase II Phase II - Scope & Goals • Update, revise and finalize the watershed management plan (WMP) for the Lee Creek and Frog Bayou watersheds • Perform additional high flow (storm event) monitoring • Perform unified stream assessments in key sub-watersheds • Include a stakeholder development and public education • Improve accuracy of loading assessments, assignment of implementation priorities and establishment of load reduction goals • Identify critical sub-watersheds at a small scale (12 digit HUC and smaller) and rank implementation measures to reduce non-point source pollution loading from key areas Phase II - Watershed Information • The Lee Creek watershed (HUC-11110104) is approximately 447 mi2 in size.
    [Show full text]
  • The Arkansas Annual Report 2015
    The Arkansas Annual Report 2015 The Arkansas Annual Report Prepared Pursuant to Section 319 (h) of the Federal Clean Water Act Arkansas Natural Resources Commission 1 The Arkansas Annual Report 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1: Summaries 3-6 Notes from the Director 3 Executive Summary 5 Deputy Director Benefield 6 Section 2: Green Infrastructure and Low Impact Development 7-13 City of Little Rock 7 Low Impact Development Project for the Illinois River Watershed 11 Section 3: Watershed Management Plans 14-16 Lee Creek and Frog Bayou 14 Lake Conway Point Remove 15 Section 4: Program Success Stories In FY2015 17-18 Illinois River Watershed Success Story 17 Section 5: Other Entities That Augment Section 319(h) Projects 19-29 Natural Resources Conservation Service 19 TNC, BWA, IWRP, CES, Discovery Farms, Multi-Wetland Mgt. Team, ANHC 22-26 Snapshot Reporting 27-29 Section 6: NPS Pollution Management Program Milestones 30-38 Milestones 1-12 31-38 Section 7: Federal Resource Allocation 39 Program Expenditures 39 Section 8: Best Management Practices 40 Section 9: FY 2014 Non-point Source Program (Program) Accomplishments 41-42 Program Staff 43 2 The Arkansas Annual Report 2015 1 SUMMARIES Notes from the Director: The Arkansas Natural Resources Commission (ANRC) is proud to provide this Annual Report for the Arkansas Nonpoint Source (NPS) Pollution Management Program. 2015 was another productive year for ANRC and the second most substantial year for the NPS Program since its beginning in Arkansas in the 1990s. After 3 years of intensive work ANRC completed an update of the Arkansas State Water Plan, in which the NPS Program is an integral part.
    [Show full text]
  • Birds in Northwestern Arkansas: an Ecological Perspective
    BIRDS in northwestern Arkansas an ecological perspective Joseph C. Neal Published by Northwest Arkansas Audubon Society Fayetteville, Arkansas www.nwarkaudubon.org Copyright © 2009 by Joseph C. Neal, 145 E. Cleburn Street, Fayetteville, AR 72701. Permission is granted for use of material in this book for non-profit conservation, charitable, or educational purposes. Preferred citation: Neal, Joseph C. 2009. Birds in northwestern Arkansas: an ecological perspective. Northwest Arkansas Audubon Society, Fayetteville, AR. 88 p. Photograph of Joe Neal on back cover by Danny Jones during a NWAAS field trip to Ninestone Land Trust in Carroll County on May 10, 2009. The author’s bird images were collected during field trips in northwestern Arkansas (except for nighthawk, from the Tallgrass Prairie Preserve in northeastern Oklahoma): Hudsonian Godwit and Stilt Sandpiper during spring migration at University farm in Fayetteville (front cover); Great Horned Owl fledglings in same location (p. 2); Common Nighthawk in native prairie (p. 3); Baltimore Oriole nest on a windy winter day at Maysville (p. 4); Eastern Meadowlark nest with eggs at Wilson Springs in Fayetteville (p. 9); Marsh Wren in bur-marigold flowers at Lake Sequoyah (p. 80); fledgling Loggerhead Shrike near the state fish hatchery at Centerton (p. 86). 2 BIRDS in northwestern Arkansas: an ecological perspective Joseph C. Neal Published in 2009 by Northwest Arkansas Audubon Society Fayetteville, Arkansas www.nwarkaudubon.org CONTENTS Introduction 4 Species accounts 9 Order Anseriformes:
    [Show full text]