Micropaleontology

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Micropaleontology Micropaleontology Pratul Kumar Saraswati • M.S. Srinivasan Micropaleontology Principles and Applications Pratul Kumar Saraswati M.S. Srinivasan Department of Earth Sciences Department of Geology Indian Institute of Technology Bombay Banaras Hindu University Mumbai , India Varanasi , India ISBN 978-3-319-14573-0 ISBN 978-3-319-14574-7 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-14574-7 Library of Congress Control Number: 2015959078 Springer Cham Heidelberg New York Dordrecht London © Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifi cally the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfi lms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specifi c statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. Printed on acid-free paper Springer International Publishing AG Switzerland is part of Springer Science+Business Media (www.springer.com) Pref ace Microfossils have been mentioned as early as the fi fth century BC by Herodotus, who travelled to Egypt and noted large size foraminifer Nummulites in the pyra- mids. The history of the study of microfossils since then has seen some major turn- ing points; the major ones being the invention of the microscope in the late seventeenth century, followed by the voyage of HMS Challenger (1872–1876) - the fi rst global marine research expedition, increased activity in exploration of oil after the second world war (1939–1945), and the voyage of the Glomar Challenger by an international initiative to core deep-sea sediments (Deep Sea Drilling Project, 1968). The development of micropaleontology through these years has unequivo- cally established the multidimensional applications of microfossils in solving prob- lems in Earth Science. The oil industry nurtured it since the twentieth century and its core application in subsurface stratigraphy continues in spite of commendable development in geophysical logging and seismic methods to interpret subsurface geology. In fact, micropaleontology has expanded its role by being indispensable in seismic calibration, sequence stratigraphy, and as a tool to guide horizontal drilling of the reservoirs to save the cost of production. The Deep Sea Drilling Project and its successors revealed another dimension of micropaleontology by providing vital information about ocean currents, deep-sea processes and paleoclimates of the past. Microfossils thus became an integral part of the newly developed fi eld of paleoceanography. It may not be inappropriate to say that among the various tracers of earth history, microfossils provide a wealth of information including the evolu- tion of life, age and paleoenvironment of sedimentary strata, paleoclimate and paleoceanography. The multiple applications of microfossils attract students and professionals of various backgrounds to employ microfossils in their research. The subject is usually taught at the postgraduate levels of universities, and it is expected that the student has a basic understanding of the principles of paleontology. Most textbooks gener- ally focus on principles of paleontology in reference to mega invertebrate fossils. However, several issues regarding sample collection, taphonomy, biomineralization and ecological details that are unique to microfossils also need to be explored and described. Keeping this in mind, Part I of the textbook addresses the basic principles v vi Preface of micropaleontology with examples of microfossils so that those who don’t have a formal background in paleontology can also develop an understanding of the sys- tematic approach to the study of microfossils. It is important to be aware of the strengths and limitations of microfossils and their geological records. Part II gives an overview of the major groups of microfossils including their morphology, ecology and geologic history. Marine microfossils, particularly foraminifera, are discussed in greater detail compared to other groups as they continue to play a major role in most scientifi c investigations. Part III of the book explains the applications of microfossils in biostratigraphy, paleoenvironmental interpretation and paleoclimate reconstruc- tion, basin analysis for hydrocarbon exploration and paleoceanography. We gratefully acknowledge and thank our colleagues and students who have contributed in various ways in preparing the book: Santanu Banerjee, Anupam Ghosh, Sonal Khanolkar, Asmita Singh, Arundeo Singh, Jyoti Sharma, Ajai Rai, C. N. Ravindran, Jahnavi Punekar, Johann Hohenegger and Komal Verma. Thanks are due to Pradeep Sawant who drafted all the illustrations. We thank Sherestha Saini, Editor, Springer Science + Business Media, for initiating the proposal and bringing it to its conclusion. P.K.S. owes more than formal thanks to Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay for providing the academic freedom to work and granting a sabbatical to write the book. M.S.S. expresses his gratitude to Banaras Hindu University for enabling him to carry out continued research in micropaleontology. P. K. Saraswati M. S. Srinivasan Contents Part I Principles 1 Introduction .............................................................................................. 3 1.1 Introduction ....................................................................................... 3 1.2 Major Groups of Microfossils ........................................................... 4 1.3 Collection of Samples ....................................................................... 7 Outcrop Samples ............................................................................... 7 Subsurface Samples .......................................................................... 8 Deep Sea Drilling Core Samples....................................................... 10 Recent Samples ................................................................................. 10 1.4 Separation of Microfossils from Matrix ............................................ 12 Calcareous Microfossils .................................................................... 12 Calcareous Nannoplankton ............................................................... 15 Siliceous Microfossils ....................................................................... 15 Phosphatic Microfossils .................................................................... 15 Plant Microfossils.............................................................................. 16 1.5 Preparation of Specimens for Scanning Electron Microscopy ........................................................................................ 16 1.6 Sample Preparation for Shell Geochemistry ..................................... 16 References .................................................................................................. 17 2 Taphonomy and Quality of the Fossil Record ....................................... 19 2.1 Introduction ....................................................................................... 19 2.2 Decay of Organic Matter ................................................................... 20 2.3 Post-mortem Transport ...................................................................... 21 2.4 Diagenesis and Dissolution ............................................................... 25 2.5 Time Averaging ................................................................................. 26 2.6 Temporal Resolution and Microstratigraphic Sampling ................... 28 References .................................................................................................. 32 vii viii Contents 3 Microfossil Biomineralization and Biogeochemistry ........................... 35 3.1 Introduction ....................................................................................... 35 3.2 Function of the Shell ......................................................................... 36 3.3 Processes of Biomineralization ......................................................... 37 3.4 Oxygen and Carbon Isotopes in Foraminifera .................................. 42 3.5 Trace Elements in Foraminifera ........................................................ 47 References .................................................................................................. 49 4 Morphology, Taxonomy and Concepts of Species ................................ 53 4.1 Introduction ....................................................................................... 53 4.2 Quantifying Morphology .................................................................. 54 4.3 Taxonomy .......................................................................................... 57 4.4 Cladistic Analysis ............................................................................
Recommended publications
  • In Pliocene Deposits, Antarctic Continental Margin (ANDRILL 1B Drill Core) Molly F
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln ANDRILL Research and Publications Antarctic Drilling Program 2009 Significance of the Trace Fossil Zoophycos in Pliocene Deposits, Antarctic Continental Margin (ANDRILL 1B Drill Core) Molly F. Miller Vanderbilt University, [email protected] Ellen A. Cowan Appalachian State University, [email protected] Simon H. H. Nielsen Florida State University Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/andrillrespub Part of the Oceanography Commons, and the Paleobiology Commons Miller, Molly F.; Cowan, Ellen A.; and Nielsen, Simon H. H., "Significance of the Trace Fossil Zoophycos in Pliocene Deposits, Antarctic Continental Margin (ANDRILL 1B Drill Core)" (2009). ANDRILL Research and Publications. 61. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/andrillrespub/61 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Antarctic Drilling Program at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in ANDRILL Research and Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Published in Antarctic Science 21(6) (2009), & Antarctic Science Ltd (2009), pp. 609–618; doi: 10.1017/ s0954102009002041 Copyright © 2009 Cambridge University Press Submitted July 25, 2008, accepted February 9, 2009 Significance of the trace fossil Zoophycos in Pliocene deposits, Antarctic continental margin (ANDRILL 1B drill core) Molly F. Miller,1 Ellen A. Cowan,2 and Simon H.H. Nielsen3 1. Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA 2. Department of Geology, Appalachian State University, Boone, NC 28608, USA 3. Antarctic Research Facility, Florida State University, Tallahassee FL 32306-4100, USA Corresponding author — Molly F.
    [Show full text]
  • Experimental Taphonomy Shows the Feasibility of Fossil Embryos
    Experimental taphonomy shows the feasibility of fossil embryos Elizabeth C. Raff*, Jeffrey T. Villinski*, F. Rudolf Turner*, Philip C. J. Donoghue†, and Rudolf A. Raff*‡ *Department of Biology and Indiana Molecular Biology Institute, Indiana University, Myers Hall 150, 915 East Third Street, Bloomington, IN 47405; and †Department of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Wills Memorial Building, Queens Road, Bristol BS8 1RJ, United Kingdom Communicated by James W. Valentine, University of California, Berkeley, CA, February 23, 2006 (received for review November 9, 2005) The recent discovery of apparent fossils of embryos contempora- external egg envelope within 15–36 days, but no preservation or neous with the earliest animal remains may provide vital insights mineralization of the embryos within was observed (18). into the metazoan radiation. However, although the putative fossil Anyone who works with marine embryos would consider remains are similar to modern marine animal embryos or larvae, preservation for sufficient time for mineralization via phospha- their simple geometric forms also resemble other organic and tization unlikely, given the seeming fragility of such embryos. inorganic structures. The potential for fossilization of animals at Freshly killed marine embryos in normal seawater decompose such developmental stages and the taphonomic processes that within a few hours. We carried out taphonomy experiments might affect preservation before mineralization have not been designed to uncover the impact of the mode of death and examined. Here, we report experimental taphonomy of marine postdeath environment on the preservational potential of ma- embryos and larvae similar in size and inferred cleavage mode to rine embryos and larvae. presumptive fossil embryos.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating the Biological Pump Efficiency of the Last Glacial Maximum Ocean Using Δ13c Anne L
    Evaluating the Biological Pump Efficiency of the Last Glacial Maximum Ocean using δ13C Anne L. Morée1, Jörg Schwinger2, Ulysses S. Ninnemann3, Aurich Jeltsch-Thömmes4, Ingo Bethke1, Christoph Heinze1 5 1Geophysical Institute, University of Bergen and Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research, Bergen, 5007, Norway 2NORCE Norwegian Research Centre and Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research, Bergen, 5838, Norway 3Department of Earth Science, University of Bergen and Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research, Bergen, 5007, Norway 4Climate and Environmental Physics, Physics Institute and Oeschger Centre for Climate Change Research, 10 University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland Correspondence to: Anne L. Morée ([email protected]) Abstract. Although both physical and biological marine changes are required to explain the 100 ppm lower atmospheric pCO2 of the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM, ~21 ka) as compared to pre-industrial (PI) times, their exact contributions are debated. Proxies of past marine carbon cycling (such as δ13C) document these changes, and 15 thus provide constraints for quantifying the drivers of long-term carbon cycle variability. This modelling study explores the relative rolespresents a realization of the of physical and biological changes in the ocean needed to simulate an LGM ocean in satisfactory agreement with proxy data, and here especially δ13C. We prepared a PI and LGM equilibrium simulation using the ocean model state (NorESM-OC) with full biogeochemistry (including the carbon isotopes δ13C and radiocarbon) and dynamic sea ice. The modelled LGM-PI differences are evaluated 20 against a wide range of physical and biogeochemical proxy data, and show agreement for key aspects of the physical ocean state within the data uncertainties.
    [Show full text]
  • Paleoceanographical Proxies Based on Deep-Sea Benthic Foraminiferal Assemblage Characteristics
    CHAPTER SEVEN Paleoceanographical Proxies Based on Deep-Sea Benthic Foraminiferal Assemblage Characteristics Frans J. JorissenÃ, Christophe Fontanier and Ellen Thomas Contents 1. Introduction 263 1.1. General introduction 263 1.2. Historical overview of the use of benthic foraminiferal assemblages 266 1.3. Recent advances in benthic foraminiferal ecology 267 2. Benthic Foraminiferal Proxies: A State of the Art 271 2.1. Overview of proxy methods based on benthic foraminiferal assemblage data 271 2.2. Proxies of bottom water oxygenation 273 2.3. Paleoproductivity proxies 285 2.4. The water mass concept 301 2.5. Benthic foraminiferal faunas as indicators of current velocity 304 3. Conclusions 306 Acknowledgements 308 4. Appendix 1 308 References 313 1. Introduction 1.1. General Introduction The most popular proxies based on microfossil assemblage data produce a quanti- tative estimate of a physico-chemical target parameter, usually by applying a transfer function, calibrated on the basis of a large dataset of recent or core-top samples. Examples are planktonic foraminiferal estimates of sea surface temperature (Imbrie & Kipp, 1971) and reconstructions of sea ice coverage based on radiolarian (Lozano & Hays, 1976) or diatom assemblages (Crosta, Pichon, & Burckle, 1998). These à Corresponding author. Developments in Marine Geology, Volume 1 r 2007 Elsevier B.V. ISSN 1572-5480, DOI 10.1016/S1572-5480(07)01012-3 All rights reserved. 263 264 Frans J. Jorissen et al. methods are easy to use, apply empirical relationships that do not require a precise knowledge of the ecology of the organisms, and produce quantitative estimates that can be directly applied to reconstruct paleo-environments, and to test and tune global climate models.
    [Show full text]
  • Latest Pliocene Northern Hemisphere Glaciation Amplified by Intensified Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation
    ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-020-00023-4 OPEN Latest Pliocene Northern Hemisphere glaciation amplified by intensified Atlantic meridional overturning circulation ✉ Tatsuya Hayashi 1 , Toshiro Yamanaka 2, Yuki Hikasa3, Masahiko Sato4, Yoshihiro Kuwahara1 & Masao Ohno1 1234567890():,; The global climate has been dominated by glacial–interglacial variations since the intensifi- cation of Northern Hemisphere glaciation 2.7 million years ago. Although the Atlantic mer- idional overturning circulation has exerted strong influence on recent climatic changes, there is controversy over its influence on Northern Hemisphere glaciation because its deep limb, North Atlantic Deep Water, was thought to have weakened. Here we show that Northern Hemisphere glaciation was amplified by the intensified Atlantic meridional overturning cir- culation, based on multi-proxy records from the subpolar North Atlantic. We found that the Iceland–Scotland Overflow Water, contributing North Atlantic Deep Water, significantly increased after 2.7 million years ago and was actively maintained even in early stages of individual glacials, in contrast with late stages when it drastically decreased because of iceberg melting. Probably, the active Nordic Seas overturning during the early stages of glacials facilitated the efficient growth of ice sheets and amplified glacial oscillations. 1 Division of Environmental Changes, Faculty of Social and Cultural Studies, Kyushu University, 744 Motooka, Fukuoka 819-0395, Japan. 2 School of Marine Resources and Environment, Tokyo University of Marine Science and Technology, 4-5-7 Konan, Tokyo 108-8477, Japan. 3 Department of Earth Sciences, Graduate School of Natural Science and Technology, Okayama University, 1-1, Naka 3-chome, Tsushima, Okayama 700-8530, Japan. 4 Department of Earth ✉ and Planetary Science, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan.
    [Show full text]
  • 20. Shell Horizons in Cenozoic Upwelling-Facies Sediments Off Peru: Distribution and Mollusk Fauna in Cores from Leg 1121
    Suess, E., von Huene, R., et al., 1990 Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program, Scientific Results, Vol. 112 20. SHELL HORIZONS IN CENOZOIC UPWELLING-FACIES SEDIMENTS OFF PERU: DISTRIBUTION AND MOLLUSK FAUNA IN CORES FROM LEG 1121 Ralph Schneider2 and Gerold Wefer2 ABSTRACT Shell layers in cores extracted from the continental margin off Peru during Leg 112 of the Ocean Drilling Program (ODP) show the spatial and temporal distribution of mollusks. In addition, the faunal composition of the mollusks in these layers was investigated. Individual shell layers have been combined to form shell horizons whose origin has been traced to periods of increased molluscan growth. It seems that the limiting factor for the growth of mollusks in upwelling regions near the coast of Peru is primarily the oxygen content of the bottom water. Optimal living conditions for mollusks are found at the upper boundary of the oxygen-minimum layer (OML). This OML in the modern sea ranges in depths from 100 to 500 m. Fluctuations in the OML boundary control the spatial and temporal distribution of shell horizons on the outer shelf and upper continental slope. The distribution of mollusks depends further on tectonic events and bottom current effects in the study area. In the range of outer shelf and upper slope, these shell horizons were developed during times of lowered sea level, from the late Miocene through the Quaternary, especially during glacial episodes in the late Quaternary. INTRODUCTION comprehensive reviews of the bivalve and gastropod taxon• omy of the equatorial East Pacific faunal province, but con• Ten holes were drilled using the drill ship JOIDES Reso• tained little information about the ecology of the genera lution during Leg 112, in November and December 1986, on described.
    [Show full text]
  • Taphonomy of Fossilized Resins: Determining the Biostratinomy of Amber
    Viewmetadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk broughtto you by CORE providedby Revistes Catalanes amb Accés Obert ACTA GEOLOGICA HISPANICA, v. 35 (2000), nº 1-2, p. 171-182 Taphonomy of fossilized resins: determining the biostratinomy of amber G.O. POINAR, Jr.(1) and M. MASTALERZ(2) (1) Department of Entomology, Oregon State University, Corvallis,OR 97330. E-mail: [email protected] (2) Indiana Geological Survey, Indiana University, 611 North Walnut Grove, Bloomington, IN 47405-2208. E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT Comparing the maturity of fossilized resins with that of their enclosing bedrock can provide information on the maturity, relative age and biostratinomy of amber and copal. A method to determine this is presented here with examples of amber and copal from the Dominican Republic. Maturity of the bedrock was determined by vitrinite reflection and that of the fossilized resin by FTIR analys i s . Vitrinite oxidation values showed maturity states corresponding to lignite and sub-bituminous coal ranks. While the samples from some mines demonstrated that the maturities of the rock and fossilized resin were syngenetic, other samples indicated that recycling of the amber may have occurred. Darkening of the amber (from yel l o w to red) was correlated with increased oxi d a t i o n / w eathering. Th i s method can be a useful tool for understanding the biostratinomy of fossilized resins. Keywo rd s : Am b e r . Copal. Tap h o n o m y. Maturity. Relative age. Dominican Republi c . IN T RO D U C T I O N to the 30-45 million year dates obtained earlier by Cepek (Schlee, 1990).
    [Show full text]
  • Combining Marine Macroecology and Palaeoecology in Understanding Biodiversity: Microfossils As a Model
    Biol. Rev. (2015), pp. 000–000. 1 doi: 10.1111/brv.12223 Combining marine macroecology and palaeoecology in understanding biodiversity: microfossils as a model Moriaki Yasuhara1,2,3,∗, Derek P. Tittensor4,5, Helmut Hillebrand6 and Boris Worm4 1School of Biological Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam Road, Hong Kong SAR, China 2Swire Institute of Marine Science, The University of Hong Kong, Cape d’Aguilar Road, Shek O, Hong Kong SAR, China 3Department of Earth Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam Road, Hong Kong SAR, China 4Department of Biology, Dalhousie University, 1355 Oxford Street, Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 4R2, Canada 5United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre, 219 Huntingdon Road, Cambridge, CB3 0DL, UK 6Institute for Chemistry and Biology of the Marine Environment (ICBM), Carl-von-Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Schleusenstrasse 1, 26382 Wilhelmshaven, Germany ABSTRACT There is growing interest in the integration of macroecology and palaeoecology towards a better understanding of past, present, and anticipated future biodiversity dynamics. However, the empirical basis for this integration has thus far been limited. Here we review prospects for a macroecology–palaeoecology integration in biodiversity analyses with a focus on marine microfossils [i.e. small (or small parts of) organisms with high fossilization potential, such as foraminifera, ostracodes, diatoms, radiolaria, coccolithophores, dinoflagellates, and ichthyoliths]. Marine microfossils represent a useful model
    [Show full text]
  • Of Time and Taphonomy: Preservation in the Ediacaran
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/273127997 Of time and taphonomy: preservation in the Ediacaran CHAPTER · JANUARY 2014 READS 36 2 AUTHORS, INCLUDING: Charlotte Kenchington University of Cambridge 5 PUBLICATIONS 2 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE Available from: Charlotte Kenchington Retrieved on: 02 October 2015 ! OF TIME AND TAPHONOMY: PRESERVATION IN THE EDIACARAN CHARLOTTE G. KENCHINGTON! 1,2 AND PHILIP R. WILBY2 1Department of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EQ, UK <[email protected]! > 2British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham, NG12 5GG, UK ABSTRACT.—The late Neoproterozoic witnessed a revolution in the history of life: the transition from a microbial world to the one known today. The enigmatic organisms of the Ediacaran hold the key to understanding the early evolution of metazoans and their ecology, and thus the basis of Phanerozoic life. Crucial to interpreting the information they divulge is a thorough understanding of their taphonomy: what is preserved, how it is preserved, and also what is not preserved. Fortunately, this Period is also recognized for its abundance of soft-tissue preservation, which is viewed through a wide variety of taphonomic windows. Some of these, such as pyritization and carbonaceous compression, are also present throughout the Phanerozoic, but the abundance and variety of moldic preservation of body fossils in siliciclastic settings is unique to the Ediacaran. In rare cases, one organism is preserved in several preservational styles which, in conjunction with an increased understanding of the taphonomic processes involved in each style, allow confident interpretations of aspects of the biology and ecology of the organisms preserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Trace Fossils and Extended Organisms: a Physiological Perspective
    Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 192 (2003) 15^31 www.elsevier.com/locate/palaeo Trace fossils and extended organisms: a physiological perspective J. Scott Turner à Department of Environmental and Forest Biology, SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA Received 7 January 2002; accepted 6 December 2002 Abstract Organism-built structures have long been useful artifacts for students of evolution and systematics, because they represent a permanent record of a set of behaviors. These structures also represent an investment of energy by an organism, and to persist in the fossil record, the energetic investment in the structure must pay off for the organisms that build it, in either improved survivorship, increased physiological efficiency or enhanced fecundity. A useful way to think about this aspect of organism-built structures is to treat them as external organs of physiology, channeling or tapping into energy sources for doing physiological work. This paper reviews briefly how burrows and nests can act as external organs of physiology at various levels of organization, and introduces the notion of organism-built structures as adaptive structures, in which feedback controls confer adaptability to organisms’ external constructions, and which promote homeostasis of the organism and its local environment. Miller’s concept of trace fossils as behavioral tokens reflects this aspect of animal-built structures, and may illuminate many unanswered questions concerning their origins and persistence in the fossil record. ß 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. Keywords: biogenic structures; extended physiology; extended organism; boundary layer; induced £ow; natural convection; kelp; termite; £uid mechanics; soil water 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Taphonomy of Early Triassic Fish Fossils of the Vega-Phroso Siltstone Member of the Sulphur Mountain Formation Near Wapiti Lake, British Columbia, Canada
    Journal of Palaeogeography 2013, 2(4): 321-343 DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1261.2013.00034 Biopalaeogeography and palaeoecology Taphonomy of Early Triassic fish fossils of the Vega-Phroso Siltstone Member of the Sulphur Mountain Formation near Wapiti Lake, British Columbia, Canada Karen Anderson, Adam D. Woods* Department of Geological Sciences, California State University, Fullerton, P. O. Box 6850, CA 92834-6850, USA Abstract The taphonomy of fishes living in lacustrine environments has been extensively studied in both the laboratory and the fossil record; the taphonomy of marine fishes, however, is poorly known. Triassic marine fishes with heavy ganoid and cosmoid scales, which provided protection from rapid taphonomic loss, offer a means to examine marine fish taphonomy in the fossil record. Four genera of Early Triassic fishes (the ray-finned actinopterygians Albertonia, Bobasatrania, Boreosomus, and the lobe-finned coelacanth (sarcopterygian), Whiteia) from the Wapiti Lake, British Columbia locality of the Lower Triassic Sulphur Mountain Formation were examined in order to gain a better understanding of the taphonomy of fish in marine en- vironments, determine ambient environmental conditions in the region during the Early Trias- sic, and ascertain the habitat and mode of life of the fish. Results indicate that environmental conditions that contributed to the preservation of the fossil fishes of the current study included deposition in deep, quiet waters, which reduced the odds of disarticulation, colder waters un- der higher pressure, which slowed decay and limited postmortem floatation, and waters that were anoxic, which discouraged predators and scavengers. In addition, the thickness of the primitive ganoid and cosmoid scales of the fossil fishes also increased their preservation po- tential.
    [Show full text]
  • Micropaleontology of the Lower Mesoproterozoic Roper Group, Australia, and Implications for Early Eukaryotic Evolution
    Micropaleontology of the Lower Mesoproterozoic Roper Group, Australia, and Implications for Early Eukaryotic Evolution The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Javaux, Emmanuelle J., and Andrew H. Knoll. 2017. Micropaleontology of the Lower Mesoproterozoic Roper Group, Australia, and Implications for Early Eukaryotic Evolution. Journal of Paleontology 91, no. 2 (March): 199-229. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:41291563 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA Journal of Paleontology, 91(2), 2017, p. 199–229 Copyright © 2016, The Paleontological Society. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 0022-3360/16/0088-0906 doi: 10.1017/jpa.2016.124 Micropaleontology of the lower Mesoproterozoic Roper Group, Australia, and implications for early eukaryotic evolution Emmanuelle J. Javaux,1 and Andrew H. Knoll2 1Department of Geology, UR Geology, University of Liège, 14 allée du 6 Août B18, Quartier Agora, Liège 4000, Belgium 〈[email protected]〉 2Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA 〈[email protected]〉 Abstract.—Well-preserved microfossils occur in abundance through more than 1000 m of lower Mesoproterozoic siliciclastic rocks composing the Roper Group, Northern Territory, Australia.
    [Show full text]