Remote Sensing in Agriculture—Accomplishments, Limitations, and Opportunities

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Remote Sensing in Agriculture—Accomplishments, Limitations, and Opportunities remote sensing Review Remote Sensing in Agriculture—Accomplishments, Limitations, and Opportunities Sami Khanal * , Kushal KC , John P. Fulton, Scott Shearer and Erdal Ozkan Department of Food, Agricultural and Biological Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA; [email protected] (K.K.); [email protected] (J.P.F.); [email protected] (S.S.); [email protected] (E.O.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 5 October 2020; Accepted: 11 November 2020; Published: 19 November 2020 Abstract: Remote sensing (RS) technologies provide a diagnostic tool that can serve as an early warning system, allowing the agricultural community to intervene early on to counter potential problems before they spread widely and negatively impact crop productivity. With the recent advancements in sensor technologies, data management and data analytics, currently, several RS options are available to the agricultural community. However, the agricultural sector is yet to implement RS technologies fully due to knowledge gaps on their sufficiency, appropriateness and techno-economic feasibilities. This study reviewed the literature between 2000 to 2019 that focused on the application of RS technologies in production agriculture, ranging from field preparation, planting, and in-season applications to harvesting, with the objective of contributing to the scientific understanding on the potential for RS technologies to support decision-making within different production stages. We found an increasing trend in the use of RS technologies in agricultural production over the past 20 years, with a sharp increase in applications of unmanned aerial systems (UASs) after 2015. The largest number of scientific papers related to UASs originated from Europe (34%), followed by the United States (20%) and China (11%). Most of the prior RS studies have focused on soil moisture and in-season crop health monitoring, and less in areas such as soil compaction, subsurface drainage, and crop grain quality monitoring. In summary, the literature highlighted that RS technologies can be used to support site-specific management decisions at various stages of crop production, helping to optimize crop production while addressing environmental quality, profitability, and sustainability. Keywords: remote sensing; satellite; UAS; precision agriculture 1. Introduction Digital agriculture or precision agriculture (PA), concepts that are often used interchangeably, represent the use of large data sources in conjunction with advanced crop and environmental analytical tools to help farmers adopt the right management practices at the right rates, times and places, with the goal of achieving both economic and environmental targets. In recent years, there has been growing interest in PA globally as a promising step towards meeting an unprecedented demand to produce more food and energy of higher qualities in a more sustainable manner by optimizing externalities. Remote sensing (RS) is one of the PA technologies that allows growers to collect, visualize, and evaluate crop and soil health conditions at various stages of production in a convenient and cost-effective manner. It can serve as an early indicator to detect potential problems, and provide opportunities to address these problems in a timely fashion. Application of RS technologies in agriculture started with the first launch of the Landsat Multispectral Scanner System (MSS) satellite in 1972. Bauer and Cipra [1] used Landsat MSS to Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 3783; doi:10.3390/rs12223783 www.mdpi.com/journal/remotesensing Remote Sens. 2020, 12, x FOR PEER REVIEW 2 of 28 recently, the use of satellite-based data for PA has been sparse and limited only to the large-scale monitoring and mapping of agricultural health due to the limited availability of high spatial (>5 m) and temporal (daily) resolution satellite data. With technological advancements in global positioning systems (GPS), machinery, hardware and software, cloud computing, and Internet of Things (IoT), RS technologies can now be used at a scale much smaller than a field. Some of this is evident from a long list of satellite sensors with high spatial and temporal resolutions that have been deployed on earth orbits over the decades since 1999 (Figure 1). Various RS platforms are currently used, including handheld, aircraft and satellite, which can be used to collect data at different spatial, temporal, and spectral resolutions. The most appropriate Remoteresolutions Sens. 2020 required, 12, 3783 for PA depend on multiple factors, including management objectives, crops2 ofand 29 their growth stages, the size of a field, and the ability of a farm machinery to vary inputs (fertilizer, pesticides, irrigation). For instance, ability to detect crop emergence is highly dependent on higher classifyspatial resolution the Midwestern data (<0.1 US agricultural m) that can landscapes help differentiate into corn crop or soybean characteristics fields. However, (i.e., leaves, until area) recently, at a thestand use level of satellite-based [2–5]than that datarequired for PA for has crop been yield sparse estimation and limited (1–3 m) only [6]; to multispectral the large-scale imagery monitoring helps andassess mapping crop health of agricultural patterns that health visible due (VIS) to the imag limitedery cannot availability detect of [7], high and spatial thermal (>5 imagery m) and temporalis useful (daily)for detecting resolution pest satellite pressure data. [8,9], With soil technological moisture [10], advancements and crop water in global stress positioning [11] that the systems naked (GPS), eye machinery,cannot detect. hardware Unlike andvisible software, and infrared cloud (IR) computing, -based RS, and microwaves Internet of Thingsare less (IoT),prone RS to technologiesatmospheric canattenuation now be usedand can at a help scale determine much smaller the thanbiophysical a field. Someproperties of this of is crops evident and from soil aunder long list any of day satellite and sensorsnight conditions with high [12,13]. spatial and temporal resolutions that have been deployed on earth orbits over the decades since 1999 (Figure1). Figure 1. List of satellite sensors and their spatial resolutions since 1999. Note: Satellites with a multispectralFigure 1. List sensor of satellite typically sensors provide and visual their orspatial panchromatic resolutions bands. since NIR: 1999. near Note: infrared. Satellites with a multispectral sensor typically provide visual or panchromatic bands. NIR: near infrared. Various RS platforms are currently used, including handheld, aircraft and satellite, which can be usedMonitoring to collect agriculture data at diff througherent spatial, RS is temporal,a broad topic, and and spectral several resolutions. studies have The provided most appropriate reviews resolutionsof RS techniques required and for applications PA depend in on agriculture multiple factors, from multiple including angles, management sometimes objectives, based on crops specific and theirapplications growth (e.g., stages, estimation the size of of a field,soil properties, and the ability soil ofmoisture, a farm machineryyield prediction, to vary disease inputs (fertilizer,and pest pesticides,management, irrigation). weed detection), For instance, methods, ability tosensors detect crop(visual, emergence multispectral, is highly thermal, dependent microwave, on higher spatialhyperspectral), resolution RS dataplatform (<0.1 (e.g., m) that satellite, can help unmanned differentiate aerial cropsystem characteristics (UAS)), or specific (i.e., leaves, location area) (e.g., at acountry stand levelor continent). [2–5] than The that overarching required for goal crop of yield this estimationstudy is to (1–3 complement m) [6]; multispectral previous efforts imagery by helpsproviding assess a comprehensive crop health patterns review that on visible the use (VIS) of RS imagery technologies cannot in detect different [7], and aspects thermal of production imagery is usefulagriculture, for detecting ranging pest from pressure field preparation [8,9], soil moistureto seedin [g10 to], in-season and crop watercrop health stress [monitoring11] that the to naked harvest. eye cannotWe do not detect. intend Unlike to provide visible details and infrared on the methods (IR)-based used RS, by microwaves the prior studies, are less nor prone do we to atmosphericrecommend attenuationany single best and way can of help using determine RS data. theInstead, biophysical we critically properties reviewed of crops prior and studies soil under by focusing any day on andthe nighttypes conditionsand platforms [12, 13of ].RS sensors used in various aspects of production agriculture and the reported accuraciesMonitoring of RS data agriculture with respec throught to ground-truth RS is a broad data, with topic, the and intention several to studiesserve as havea meta-analysis provided reviewsto help determine of RS techniques the reliability and applications of RS data in in the agriculture context of from a given multiple application. angles, This sometimes paper is based divided on specificinto three applications sections. The (e.g., first estimation section provides of soil properties, an overview soil moisture,of the progress yield prediction,of RS technologies disease and on pestagricultural management, applications weed by detection), breaking methods, down the sensors prior studies (visual, between multispectral, 2000 and thermal, 2019 according microwave, to hyperspectral),sensor and platform RS
Recommended publications
  • Digital Mapping of Soil Properties in the Western-Facing Slope of Jabal
    JJEES (2020) 11 (3): 193-201 JJEES ISSN 1995-6681 Jordan Journal of Earth and Environmental Sciences Digital Mapping of Soil Properties in the Western-Facing Slope of Jabal Al-Arab at Suwaydaa Governorate, Syria Alaa Khallouf 1,4, Sami AlHinawi2, Wassim AlMesber3, Sameer Shamsham4,Younis Idries5 1General Commission for Scientific Agricultural Research (GCSAR), Damascus, Syria 2Suwayda Research Center- GCSAR, Suwayda, Syria 3Damascus University, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Soil Science, Syria 4Al-Baath University, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Soil and Land reclamation, Syria 5General Organization of Remote Sensing (GORS), Syria Received 28 December 2019; Accepted 10 April 2020 Abstract Digital soil mapping has been increasingly used to produce statistical models of the relationships between environmental variables and soil properties. This study aimed at determining and representing the spatial distribution of the variability in soil properties of western face-sloping of Jabal Al-Arab, Suwaydaa governorate. pH, organic matter (OM), total nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P, as P2O5), potassium (K, as K2O), iron (Fe), boron (B) and zinc (Zn) were studied, thus, Forty-five surface soil samples (0 to 30 cm) were collected and analyzed. Descriptive statistics demonstrated that most of the measured soil variables (except pH, P2O5, and Zn) were skewed and ab-normally distributed, and logarithmic transformation was then applied. Kriging was used- as geostatistical tool- in ArcGIS to interpolate observed values for those variables, and the digital map layers were produced based on each soil property. Geostatistical interpolation recognized a strong spatial variability for pH, P2O5 & Zn, moderate for OM, N, Fe & B, and weak for K2O.
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Soil Mapping in the Bara District of Nepal Using Kriging Tool in Arcgis
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Agronomy & Horticulture -- Faculty Publications Agronomy and Horticulture Department 10-26-2018 Digital soil mapping in the Bara district of Nepal using kriging tool in ArcGIS Dinesh Panday University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Bijesh Maharjan University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Devraj Chalise Nepal Agricultural Research Council Ram Kumar Shrestha Institute of Agriculture and Animal Science, Lamjung, Nepal Bikesh Twanabasu Westfalische Wilhelms Universitat, Munster Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/agronomyfacpub Part of the Agricultural Science Commons, Agriculture Commons, Agronomy and Crop Sciences Commons, Botany Commons, Horticulture Commons, Other Plant Sciences Commons, and the Plant Biology Commons Panday, Dinesh; Maharjan, Bijesh; Chalise, Devraj; Shrestha, Ram Kumar; and Twanabasu, Bikesh, "Digital soil mapping in the Bara district of Nepal using kriging tool in ArcGIS" (2018). Agronomy & Horticulture -- Faculty Publications. 1130. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/agronomyfacpub/1130 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Agronomy and Horticulture Department at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Agronomy & Horticulture -- Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. RESEARCH ARTICLE Digital soil mapping in the Bara district of Nepal using kriging tool in ArcGIS 1 1 2 3 Dinesh PandayID *, Bijesh Maharjan , Devraj Chalise , Ram Kumar Shrestha , Bikesh Twanabasu4,5 1 Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, United States of America, 2 Nepal Agricultural Research Council, Lalitpur, Nepal, 3 Institute of Agriculture and Animal Science, Lamjung Campus, Lamjung, Nepal, 4 Hexa International Pvt.
    [Show full text]
  • Good Practices for the Preparation of Digital Soil Maps
    UNIVERSIDAD DE COSTA RICA CENTRO DE INVESTIGACIONES AGRONÓMICAS FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS AGROALIMENTARIAS GOOD PRACTICES FOR THE PREPARATION OF DIGITAL SOIL MAPS Resilience and comprehensive risk management in agriculture Inter-american Institute for Cooperation on Agriculture University of Costa Rica Agricultural Research Center UNIVERSIDAD DE COSTA RICA CENTRO DE INVESTIGACIONES AGRONÓMICAS FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS AGROALIMENTARIAS GOOD PRACTICES FOR THE PREPARATION OF DIGITAL SOIL MAPS Resilience and comprehensive risk management in agriculture Inter-american Institute for Cooperation on Agriculture University of Costa Rica Agricultural Research Center GOOD PRACTICES FOR THE PREPARATION OF DIGITAL SOIL MAPS Inter-American institute for Cooperation on Agriculture (IICA), 2016 Good practices for the preparation of digital soil maps by IICA is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO (CC-BY-SA 3.0 IGO) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/igo/) Based on a work at www.iica.int IICA encourages the fair use of this document. Proper citation is requested. This publication is also available in electronic (PDF) format from the Institute’s Web site: http://www.iica. int Content Editorial coordination: Rafael Mata Chinchilla, Dangelo Sandoval Chacón, Jonathan Castro Chinchilla, Foreword .................................................... 5 Christian Solís Salazar Editing in Spanish: Máximo Araya Acronyms .................................................... 6 Layout: Sergio Orellana Caballero Introduction .................................................. 7 Translation into English: Christina Feenny Cover design: Sergio Orellana Caballero Good practices for the preparation of digital soil maps................. 9 Printing: Sergio Orellana Caballero Glossary .................................................... 15 Bibliography ................................................. 18 Good practices for the preparation of digital soil maps / IICA, CIA – San Jose, C.R.: IICA, 2016 00 p.; 00 cm X 00 cm ISBN: 978-92-9248-652-5 1.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Era of Digital Soil Mapping Across Forested Landscapes 14 Chuck Bulmera,*, David Pare´ B, Grant M
    CHAPTER A new era of digital soil mapping across forested landscapes 14 Chuck Bulmera,*, David Pare´ b, Grant M. Domkec aBC Ministry Forests Lands Natural Resource Operations Rural Development, Vernon, BC, Canada, bNatural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Laurentian Forestry Centre, Quebec, QC, Canada, cNorthern Research Station, USDA Forest Service, St. Paul, MN, United States *Corresponding author ABSTRACT Soil maps provide essential information for forest management, and a recent transformation of the map making process through digital soil mapping (DSM) is providing much improved soil information compared to what was available through traditional mapping methods. The improvements include higher resolution soil data for greater mapping extents, and incorporating a wide range of environmental factors to predict soil classes and attributes, along with a better understanding of mapping uncertainties. In this chapter, we provide a brief introduction to the concepts and methods underlying the digital soil map, outline the current state of DSM as it relates to forestry and global change, and provide some examples of how DSM can be applied to evaluate soil changes in response to multiple stressors. Throughout the chapter, we highlight the immense potential of DSM, but also describe some of the challenges that need to be overcome to truly realize this potential. Those challenges include finding ways to provide additional field data to train models and validate results, developing a group of highly skilled people with combined abilities in computational science and pedology, as well as the ongoing need to encourage communi- cation between the DSM community, land managers and decision makers whose work we believe can benefit from the new information provided by DSM.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Digital Soil Mapping Approaches with Large Sets of Environmental Covariates
    SOIL, 4, 1–22, 2018 https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-4-1-2018 © Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under SOIL the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Evaluation of digital soil mapping approaches with large sets of environmental covariates Madlene Nussbaum1, Kay Spiess1, Andri Baltensweiler2, Urs Grob3, Armin Keller3, Lucie Greiner3, Michael E. Schaepman4, and Andreas Papritz1 1Institute of Biogeochemistry and Pollutant Dynamics, ETH Zürich, Universitätstrasse 16, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland 2Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research (WSL), Zürcherstrasse 111, 8903 Birmensdorf, Switzerland 3Research Station Agroscope Reckenholz-Taenikon ART, Reckenholzstrasse 191, 8046 Zürich, Switzerland 4Remote Sensing Laboratories, University of Zurich, Wintherthurerstrasse 190, 8057 Zürich, Switzerland Correspondence: Madlene Nussbaum ([email protected]) Received: 19 April 2017 – Discussion started: 9 May 2017 Revised: 11 October 2017 – Accepted: 24 November 2017 – Published: 10 January 2018 Abstract. The spatial assessment of soil functions requires maps of basic soil properties. Unfortunately, these are either missing for many regions or are not available at the desired spatial resolution or down to the required soil depth. The field-based generation of large soil datasets and conventional soil maps remains costly. Mean- while, legacy soil data and comprehensive sets of spatial environmental data are available for many regions. Digital soil mapping (DSM) approaches relating soil data (responses) to environmental
    [Show full text]
  • The Use of Proximal Soil Sensor Data Fusion and Digital Soil Mapping For
    The use of proximal soil sensor data fusion and digital soil mapping for precision agriculture Wenjun Ji, Viacheslav Adamchuk, Songchao Chen, Asim Biswas, Maxime Leclerc, Raphael Viscarra Rossel To cite this version: Wenjun Ji, Viacheslav Adamchuk, Songchao Chen, Asim Biswas, Maxime Leclerc, et al.. The use of proximal soil sensor data fusion and digital soil mapping for precision agriculture. Pedometrics 2017, Jun 2017, Wageningen, Netherlands. 298 p. hal-01601278 HAL Id: hal-01601278 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01601278 Submitted on 2 Jun 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution - ShareAlike| 4.0 International License Abstract Book Pedometrics 2017 Wageningen, 26 June – 1 July 2017 2 Contents Evaluating Use of Ground Penetrating Radar and Geostatistic Methods for Mapping Soil Cemented Horizon .................................... 13 Digital soil mapping in areas of mussunungas: algoritmos comparission .......... 14 Sensing of farm and district-scale soil moisture content using a mobile cosmic ray probe (COSMOS Rover) .................................... 15 Proximal sensing of soil crack networks using three-dimensional electrical resistivity to- mography ......................................... 16 Using digital microscopy for rapid determination of soil texture and prediction of soil organic matter .....................................
    [Show full text]
  • Selection and Use of Soil Characteristics in Digital Soil Mapping in Tanzania
    Selection and use of soil characteristics in digital soil mapping in Tanzania A M. Kilasara ASokoine University of Agriculture, P.O. Box 3008 Morogoro, Tanzania, Email [email protected], [email protected] Abstract A study of soil characteristics was conducted in three different agro-ecological zones representing the humid, sub humid and semi-arid-sub humid zones in East Africa. The selected sites correspond to high potential medium and near-marginal areas for the production of maize. Emphasis was put on the topsoil characteristics which largely influence the performance of soils in terms of crop production in the inter-tropical African region. Topsoil depth, available water capacity, organic carbon content, pH, and bulk density, cation exchange capacity are among the key characteristics that influence the functioning of the studied soils. In certain cases, a few key characteristics determine the soils behaviour while in others the same do not. The selection of which ones are critical for a given soil requires detailed analysis supported by field evidence such as experimental data. Spatial heterogeneity in magnitude of individual soil characteristics was common in all sites. In the future digital soil mapping should provide room for subsequent upgrading of the soil information as more data become available. A digital soil map should be prepared such that it provides a possibility to extract information at various resolutions according to needs. Key Words Soil characterisatiation, digital soil map. Introduction The publication of the soil map of the World in 1981 paved the way for classifying soils using a widely accepted harmonised criteria and nomenclature at the global scale.
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Mapping of Soil Associations and Eroded Soils (Prokhorovskii District, Belgorod Oblast) A
    ISSN 1064-2293, Eurasian Soil Science, 2021, Vol. 54, No. 1, pp. 13–24. © Pleiades Publishing, Ltd., 2021. Russian Text © The Author(s), 2021, published in Pochvovedenie, 2021, No. 1, pp. 17–30. GENESIS AND GEOGRAPHY OF SOILS Digital Mapping of Soil Associations and Eroded Soils (Prokhorovskii District, Belgorod Oblast) A. P. Zhidkina, *, M. A. Smirnovaa, b, A. N. Gennadievb, S. V. Lukinc, Ye. A. Zazdravnykhd, and N. I. Lozbeneva aDokuchaev Soil Science Institute, per. Pyzhevskii 7, Moscow, 119017 Russia bLomonosov Moscow State University, Leninskie Gory 1, Moscow, 119999 Russia cBelgorod State University, ul. Pobedy 85, Belgorod, 308015 Russia. dBelgorod Agrarian Center, ul. Shchorsa 8, Belgorod, 308027 Russia *e-mail: [email protected] Received April 19, 2020; revised May 24, 2020; accepted June 17, 2020 Abstract—A new method of digital mapping of the soil cover pattern with calculation of the share of soils of different taxa and degree classes for soil erosion in the soil associations is proposed. A comparative analysis of soil maps obtained using different methods of construction (visual expert and digital) and with their differ- ent contents (displaying the dominant soil or soil associations) has been performed. In the case of mapping by the visual expert method (with the display of the dominant soil), a significant underestimation of the total area of moderately and strongly eroded soils in comparison with the digital mapping is noted. These differ- ences are due to the underestimation of the area of small polygons with moderately and strongly eroded soils in the composition of soil associations on slopes of low steepness and in shallow hollows in the visual expert method of mapping.
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Soil Mapping Using Landscape Stratification for Arid Rangelands in the Eastern Great Basin, Central Utah
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies 5-2015 Digital Soil Mapping Using Landscape Stratification for Arid Rangelands in the Eastern Great Basin, Central Utah Brook B. Fonnesbeck Utah State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd Part of the Soil Science Commons Recommended Citation Fonnesbeck, Brook B., "Digital Soil Mapping Using Landscape Stratification for Arid Rangelands in the Eastern Great Basin, Central Utah" (2015). All Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 4525. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/4525 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DIGITAL SOIL MAPPING USING LANDSCAPE STRATIFICATION FOR ARID RANGELANDS IN THE EASTERN GREAT BASIN, CENTRAL UTAH by Brook B. Fonnesbeck A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in Soil Science Approved: _____________________________ _____________________________ Dr. Janis L. Boettinger Dr. Joel L. Pederson Major Professor Committee Member _____________________________ _____________________________ Dr. R Douglas Ramsey Dr. Mark R. McLellan Committee Member Dean of the School of Graduate Studies UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY Logan, Utah 2015 ii Copyright © Brook B. Fonnesbeck 2015 iii ABSTRACT Digital Soil Mapping Using Landscape Stratification for Arid Rangelands in the Eastern Great Basin, Central Utah by Brook B. Fonnesbeck, Master of Science Utah State University, 2015 Major Professor: Dr. Janis L. Boettinger Department: Plants, Soils and Climate Digital soil mapping typically involves inputs of digital elevation models, remotely sensed imagery, and other spatially explicit digital data as environmental covariates to predict soil classes and attributes over a landscape using statistical models.
    [Show full text]
  • Rusell Review
    European Journal of Soil Science, March 2019, 70, 216–235 doi: 10.1111/ejss.12790 Rusell Review Pedology and digital soil mapping (DSM) Yuxin Ma , Budiman Minasny , Brendan P. Malone & Alex B. Mcbratney Sydney Institute of Agriculture, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, Eveleigh, New South Wales, Australia Summary Pedology focuses on understanding soil genesis in the field and includes soil classification and mapping. Digital soil mapping (DSM) has evolved from traditional soil classification and mapping to the creation and population of spatial soil information systems by using field and laboratory observations coupled with environmental covariates. Pedological knowledge of soil distribution and processes can be useful for digital soil mapping. Conversely, digital soil mapping can bring new insights to pedogenesis, detailed information on vertical and lateral soil variation, and can generate research questions that were not considered in traditional pedology. This review highlights the relevance and synergy of pedology in soil spatial prediction through the expansion of pedological knowledge. We also discuss how DSM can support further advances in pedology through improved representation of spatial soil information. Some major findings of this review are as follows: (a) soil classes can bemapped accurately using DSM, (b) the occurrence and thickness of soil horizons, whole soil profiles and soil parent material can be predicted successfully with DSM techniques, (c) DSM can provide valuable information on pedogenic processes (e.g. addition, removal, transformation and translocation), (d) pedological knowledge can be incorporated into DSM, but DSM can also lead to the discovery of knowledge, and (e) there is the potential to use process-based soil–landscape evolution modelling in DSM.
    [Show full text]
  • Classification of Landforms for Digital Soil Mapping in Urban
    land Article Classification of Landforms for Digital Soil Mapping in Urban Areas Using LiDAR Data Derived Terrain Attributes: A Case Study from Berlin, Germany Mohamed Ali Mohamed Department of Geography, Humboldt University of Berlin, 10099 Berlin, Germany; [email protected] Received: 9 August 2020; Accepted: 7 September 2020; Published: 9 September 2020 Abstract: In this study, a knowledge-based fuzzy classification method was used to classify possible soil-landforms in urban areas based on analysis of morphometric parameters (terrain attributes) derived from digital elevation models (DEMs). A case study in the city area of Berlin was used to compare two different resolution DEMs in terms of their potential to find a specific relationship between landforms, soil types and the suitability of these DEMs for soil mapping. Almost all the topographic parameters were obtained from high-resolution light detection and ranging (LiDAR)-DEM (1 m) and Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER)-DEM (30 m), which were used as thresholds for the classification of landforms in the selected study area with a total area of about 39.40 km2. The accuracy of both classifications was evaluated by comparing ground point samples as ground truth data with the classification results. The LiDAR-DEM based classification has shown promising results for classification of landforms into geomorphological (sub)categories in urban areas. This is indicated by an acceptable overall accuracy of 93%. While the classification based on ASTER-DEM showed an accuracy of 70%. The coarser ASTER-DEM based classification requires additional and more detailed information directly related to soil-forming factors to extract geomorphological parameters.
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Soil Mapping As a Support to Production Of
    Digital Soil Mapping as a support to production of functional maps prepared by Digital Soil Mapping Working Group of the European Soil Bureau Network Edited by Endre Dobos, Florence Carré, Tomislav Hengl Hannes I. Reuter & Gergely Tóth Soilscape Inference System Function database Function organizer Prediction 0. 120 e c n 0.090 a i r a v i m 0.060 e Nugget = 0.042 S C0+C1 = 0.097 0.030 R = 175 . 2 m exponential model 400 800 1200 1600 Distance ( )m 2006 EUR 22123 EN This document may be cited as follows: Dobos, E., Carré, F., Hengl, T., Reuter, H.I., Tóth, G., 2006. Digital Soil Mapping as a support to production of functional maps. EUR 22123 EN, 68 pp. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxemburg. © European Communities, 2006 LEGAL NOTICE Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for the use which might be made of the following information. This publication is intended for internal JRC use only. The DSM Working Group is the advisory board made from researchers and soil mapping experts from EU countries. It has been founded at the last 2004 Plenary of the European Soil Bureau Network (Ispra, Nov 2004) as a support to the Soil Information WG. Its task is to review data, techniques and applications of digital soil mapping and to propose common methodologies for mapping European soils at different scales. Furthermore the WG Activities input to exploitation of potentials to assist the European Commission in policies related to sustainability of soils, namely to inventory and monitor soil functions for the purpose of policy making.
    [Show full text]