DOCSLIB.ORG

Aeolidia Papillosa (Linnaeus, 1761)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Aeolidia Papillosa (Linnaeus, 1761) Aeolidia papillosa (Linnaeus, 1761) AphiaID: 138709 COMMON GREY SEA SLUG Euthyneura (Infraclasse) > Nudipleura (Superordem) > Cladobranchia (Subordem) Viktor V. Grøtan Rainer Borcherding - Schutzstation Wattenmeer, via beachexplorer.org Steve Lonhart / NOAA MBNMSDomínio Público Facilmente confundível com: 1 Aeolidiella glauca Aeolidiella sanguinea Nudibrânquio nudibrânquio Aeolidia filomenae Aeolidiella alderi nudibrânquio nudibrânquio Sinónimos Aeolidia papillosa var. pacifica Bergh, 1879 Aeolis lesliana MacGillivray, 1843 Aeolis murrayana MacGillivray, 1843 Doris bodoensis Gunnerus, 1770 Doris vermigera Turton, 1807 Eolis farinacea Stimpson, 1853 Eolis obtusalis Alder & Hancock, 1842 Eolis papillosa (Linnaeus, 1761) Eolis plumata Dalyell, 1853 Eolis rosea Alder & Hancock, 1842 Limax papillosus Linnaeus, 1761 Referências Linnaeus, C. (1761). Fauna Suecica sistens Animalia Sueciae Regni: Mammalia, Aves, Amphibia, Pisces, Insecta, Vermes. Distributa per Classes, Ordines, Genera, Species, cum Differentiis Specierum, Synonymis Auctorum, Nominibus Incolarum, Locis Natalium, Descriptionibus insectorum. Editio altera, auctior. Stockholmiae: L. Salvii, 48 +578disponível pp., online em http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/100333 original description Linnaeus, C. (1761). Fauna Suecica sistens Animalia Sueciae Regni: Mammalia, Aves, Amphibia, Pisces, Insecta, Vermes. Distributa per Classes, Ordines, Genera, Species, cum Differentiis Specierum, Synonymis Auctorum, Nominibus Incolarum, Locis Natalium, Descriptionibus insectorum. Editio altera, auctior. Stockholmiae: L. Salvii, 48 + 578 pp., available online at http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/100333 [details] 2 additional source Carmona L., Pola M., Gosliner T.M. & Cervera J.L. 2013. A tale that morphology fails to tell: A molecular phylogeny of Aeolidiidae (Aeolidida, Nudibranchia, Gastropoda). PLoS ONE 8(5): e63000. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0063000, available online at http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0063000 [details] basis of record Kienberger K., Carmona L., Pola M., Padula V., Gosliner T.M. & Cervera J.L. (2016). Aeolidia papillosa (Linnaeus, 1761) (Mollusca: Heterobranchia: Nudibranchia), single species or a cryptic species complex? A morphological and molecular study. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. 177: 481-506., available online at https://doi.org/10.1111/zoj.12379 [details] context source (Schelde) Maris, T.; Beauchard, O.; Van Damme, S.; Van den Bergh, E.; Wijnhoven, S.; Meire, P. (2013). Referentiematrices en Ecotoopoppervlaktes Annex bij de Evaluatiemethodiek Schelde-estuarium Studie naar “Ecotoopoppervlaktes en intactness index”. Monitor Taskforce Publication Series, 2013-01. NIOZ: Yerseke. 35 pp.[details] additional source Carmona L., Pola M., Gosliner T.M. & Cervera J.L. 2013. A tale that morphology fails to tell: A molecular phylogeny of Aeolidiidae (Aeolidida, Nudibranchia, Gastropoda). PLoS ONE 8(5): e63000. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0063000, available online at http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0063000 [details] basis of record Kienberger K., Carmona L., Pola M., Padula V., Gosliner T.M. & Cervera J.L. (2016). Aeolidia papillosa (Linnaeus, 1761) (Mollusca: Heterobranchia: Nudibranchia), single species or a cryptic species complex? A morphological and molecular study. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. 177: 481-506., available online at https://doi.org/10.1111/zoj.12379 [details] additional source Carmona L., Pola M., Gosliner T.M. & Cervera J.L. 2013. A tale that morphology fails to tell: A molecular phylogeny of Aeolidiidae (Aeolidida, Nudibranchia, Gastropoda). PLoS ONE 8(5): e63000. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0063000, available online at http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0063000 [details] basis of record Kienberger K., Carmona L., Pola M., Padula V., Gosliner T.M. & Cervera J.L. (2016). Aeolidia papillosa (Linnaeus, 1761) (Mollusca: Heterobranchia: Nudibranchia), single species or a cryptic species complex? A morphological and molecular study. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. 177: 481-506., available online at https://doi.org/10.1111/zoj.12379 [details] Última atualização: 11 Dez. 2017 3.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • High Level Environmental Screening Study for Offshore Wind Farm Developments – Marine Habitats and Species Project
    High Level Environmental Screening Study for Offshore Wind Farm Developments – Marine Habitats and Species Project AEA Technology, Environment Contract: W/35/00632/00/00 For: The Department of Trade and Industry New & Renewable Energy Programme Report issued 30 August 2002 (Version with minor corrections 16 September 2002) Keith Hiscock, Harvey Tyler-Walters and Hugh Jones Reference: Hiscock, K., Tyler-Walters, H. & Jones, H. 2002. High Level Environmental Screening Study for Offshore Wind Farm Developments – Marine Habitats and Species Project. Report from the Marine Biological Association to The Department of Trade and Industry New & Renewable Energy Programme. (AEA Technology, Environment Contract: W/35/00632/00/00.) Correspondence: Dr. K. Hiscock, The Laboratory, Citadel Hill, Plymouth, PL1 2PB. [email protected] High level environmental screening study for offshore wind farm developments – marine habitats and species ii High level environmental screening study for offshore wind farm developments – marine habitats and species Title: High Level Environmental Screening Study for Offshore Wind Farm Developments – Marine Habitats and Species Project. Contract Report: W/35/00632/00/00. Client: Department of Trade and Industry (New & Renewable Energy Programme) Contract management: AEA Technology, Environment. Date of contract issue: 22/07/2002 Level of report issue: Final Confidentiality: Distribution at discretion of DTI before Consultation report published then no restriction. Distribution: Two copies and electronic file to DTI (Mr S. Payne, Offshore Renewables Planning). One copy to MBA library. Prepared by: Dr. K. Hiscock, Dr. H. Tyler-Walters & Hugh Jones Authorization: Project Director: Dr. Keith Hiscock Date: Signature: MBA Director: Prof. S. Hawkins Date: Signature: This report can be referred to as follows: Hiscock, K., Tyler-Walters, H.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Invertebrate Field Guide
    Marine Invertebrate Field Guide Contents ANEMONES ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 AGGREGATING ANEMONE (ANTHOPLEURA ELEGANTISSIMA) ............................................................................................................................... 2 BROODING ANEMONE (EPIACTIS PROLIFERA) ................................................................................................................................................... 2 CHRISTMAS ANEMONE (URTICINA CRASSICORNIS) ............................................................................................................................................ 3 PLUMOSE ANEMONE (METRIDIUM SENILE) ..................................................................................................................................................... 3 BARNACLES ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 ACORN BARNACLE (BALANUS GLANDULA) ....................................................................................................................................................... 4 HAYSTACK BARNACLE (SEMIBALANUS CARIOSUS) .............................................................................................................................................. 4 CHITONS ...........................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Étude Sur L'alimentation D'aeolidia Papi Llosa L
    ÉTUDE SUR L'ALIMENTATION D'AEOLIDIA PAPI LLOSA L. par Jean-Claude Moreteau Station biologique de Roscoff et Laboratoire de Zoologie, Université Paris-Sud, Centre d'Orsay - 91405 Orsay Résumé Après une étude biologique d'Aeolidia papillosa en milieu naturel (herbier des environs de Roscoff), ce travail aborde l'adaptation alimentaire du Nudi- branche à ses proies (les Actiniaires). A partir de l'étude du cnidome des proies, on établit un coefficient de présence pour chaque type de cnidocyste dans chaque tissu. Une analyse qualitative et quantitative des fèces du prédateur permet de dégager certains faits. Les basitriches sont stockés dans les sacs cnidophores et sont aussi rejetés régulièrement. Tous les autres cnidocystes, à part les mastigophores microbasiques, sont rejetés très rapidement et sans subir de dégradation. Par contre, les mastigophores microbasiques sont rejetés plus tardivement et en grande partie dégradés. La quantité de chaque type de cnido- cyste dans les fèces confirme que le prédateur n'a pas la même appétence envers les différents tissus. Il existe une bonne relation entre le comportement prédateur du Nudibranche et son appétence envers les différents tissus de la proie. Introduction Les préférences alimentaires d'Aeolidia papillosa ont fait l'objet de nombreuses observations. Cela a permis de dresser la liste des proies du Nudibranche (Miller, 1961 ; Swennen, 1961 ; Waters, 1973 ; Edmunds et coll., 1974 pour ne citer que les travaux les plus récents). Corrélativement, des études ont porté sur le choix de la proie par ce Nudibranche (Stehouwer, 1952 ; Braams et Geelen, 1953 ; Waters, 1973 ; Edmunds et coll., 1974), ainsi que sur les réactions des Actiniaires vis-à-vis du prédateur (Robson, 1966 ; Waters, 1973 ; Edmunds et coll., 1976).
    [Show full text]
  • The Biology of Seashores - Image Bank Guide All Images and Text ©2006 Biomedia ASSOCIATES
    The Biology of Seashores - Image Bank Guide All Images And Text ©2006 BioMEDIA ASSOCIATES Shore Types Low tide, sandy beach, clam diggers. Knowing the Low tide, rocky shore, sandstone shelves ,The time and extent of low tides is important for people amount of beach exposed at low tide depends both on who collect intertidal organisms for food. the level the tide will reach, and on the gradient of the beach. Low tide, Salt Point, CA, mixed sandstone and hard Low tide, granite boulders, The geology of intertidal rock boulders. A rocky beach at low tide. Rocks in the areas varies widely. Here, vertical faces of exposure background are about 15 ft. (4 meters) high. are mixed with gentle slopes, providing much variation in rocky intertidal habitat. Split frame, showing low tide and high tide from same view, Salt Point, California. Identical views Low tide, muddy bay, Bodega Bay, California. of a rocky intertidal area at a moderate low tide (left) Bays protected from winds, currents, and waves tend and moderate high tide (right). Tidal variation between to be shallow and muddy as sediments from rivers these two times was about 9 feet (2.7 m). accumulate in the basin. The receding tide leaves mudflats. High tide, Salt Point, mixed sandstone and hard rock boulders. Same beach as previous two slides, Low tide, muddy bay. In some bays, low tides expose note the absence of exposed algae on the rocks. vast areas of mudflats. The sea may recede several kilometers from the shoreline of high tide Tides Low tide, sandy beach.
    [Show full text]
  • OREGON ESTUARINE INVERTEBRATES an Illustrated Guide to the Common and Important Invertebrate Animals
    OREGON ESTUARINE INVERTEBRATES An Illustrated Guide to the Common and Important Invertebrate Animals By Paul Rudy, Jr. Lynn Hay Rudy Oregon Institute of Marine Biology University of Oregon Charleston, Oregon 97420 Contract No. 79-111 Project Officer Jay F. Watson U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 500 N.E. Multnomah Street Portland, Oregon 97232 Performed for National Coastal Ecosystems Team Office of Biological Services Fish and Wildlife Service U.S. Department of Interior Washington, D.C. 20240 Table of Contents Introduction CNIDARIA Hydrozoa Aequorea aequorea ................................................................ 6 Obelia longissima .................................................................. 8 Polyorchis penicillatus 10 Tubularia crocea ................................................................. 12 Anthozoa Anthopleura artemisia ................................. 14 Anthopleura elegantissima .................................................. 16 Haliplanella luciae .................................................................. 18 Nematostella vectensis ......................................................... 20 Metridium senile .................................................................... 22 NEMERTEA Amphiporus imparispinosus ................................................ 24 Carinoma mutabilis ................................................................ 26 Cerebratulus californiensis .................................................. 28 Lineus ruber .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • NIH Public Access Author Manuscript Toxicon
    NIH Public Access Author Manuscript Toxicon. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 December 15. NIH-PA Author ManuscriptPublished NIH-PA Author Manuscript in final edited NIH-PA Author Manuscript form as: Toxicon. 2009 December 15; 54(8): 1065±1070. doi:10.1016/j.toxicon.2009.02.029. Acquisition and Use of Nematocysts by Cnidarian Predators Paul G. Greenwood Department of Biology, Colby College, Waterville, ME 04901, USA, [email protected] Abstract Although toxic, physically destructive, and produced solely by cnidarians, cnidocysts are acquired, stored, and used by some predators of cnidarians. Despite knowledge of this phenomenon for well over a century, little empirical evidence details the mechanisms of how (and even why) these organisms use organelles of cnidarians. However, in the past twenty years a number of published experimental investigations address two of the fundamental questions of nematocyst acquisition and use by cnidarian predators: 1) how are cnidarian predators protected from cnidocyst discharge during feeding, and 2) how are the nematocysts used by the predator? Keywords Nudibranch; Nematocyst; Kleptocnidae; Cerata; Cnidocyst; Venom; Cnidaria Introduction Nematocysts, cnidocysts used to inject venom, offer a formidable defense from predators, but despite this weaponry numerous animals from many phyla prey on cnidarians (Salvini-Plawen, 1972; Ates, 1989, 1991; Arai, 2005). Some of these predators acquire unfired cnidocysts from their prey and store those cnidocysts in functional form within their own cells; the acquired cnidocysts (which are always nematocysts) are referred to as kleptocnidae. While aeolid nudibranchs are known for sequestering nematocysts from their prey (reviewed in Greenwood, 1988), one ctenophore species, Haeckelia rubra, preys upon narcomedusae and incorporates nematocysts into its own tentacles (Carré and Carré, 1980; Mills and Miller, 1984; Carré et al., 1989).
    [Show full text]
  • Seasearch Seasearch Wales 2012 Summary Report Summary Report
    Seasearch Wales 2012 Summary Report report prepared by Kate Lock, South and West Wales coco----ordinatorordinator Liz MorMorris,ris, North Wales coco----ordinatorordinator Chris Wood, National coco----ordinatorordinator Seasearch Wales 2012 Seasearch is a volunteer marine habitat and species surveying scheme for recreational divers in Britain and Ireland. It is coordinated by the Marine Conservation Society. This report summarises the Seasearch activity in Wales in 2012. It includes summaries of the sites surveyed and identifies rare or unusual species and habitats encountered. These include a number of Welsh Biodiversity Action Plan habitats and species. It does not include all of the detailed data as this has been entered into the Marine Recorder database and supplied to Natural Resources Wales for use in its marine conservation activities. The data is also available on-line through the National Biodiversity Network. During 2012 we continued to focus on Biodiversity Action Plan species and habitats and on sites that had not been previously surveyed. Data from Wales in 2012 comprised 192 Observation Forms, 154 Survey Forms and 1 sea fan record. The total of 347 represents 19% of the data for the whole of Britain and Ireland. Seasearch in Wales is delivered by two Seasearch regional coordinators. Kate Lock coordinates the South and West Wales region which extends from the Severn estuary to Aberystwyth. Liz Morris coordinates the North Wales region which extends from Aberystwyth to the Dee. The two coordinators are assisted by a number of active Seasearch Tutors, Assistant Tutors and Dive Organisers. Overall guidance and support is provided by the National Seasearch Coordinator, Chris Wood.
    [Show full text]
  • I I I I I I I I I
    I I I I I I SEA SEARCH I Stackpole Quay 1993 to 1998 I I Full Report I I I I ÉER.O]I 1E C_E G~ad MARINE CONSERVATION C~rtgor Cefn CymmforyWales Countryside Council SOCIET Y www.projectaware.org I ! ! ~l l ] il MARINE CONSERVATION SOCIETY 9, Gloucester Road, Ross−on−Wye, Herefordshire, HR9 5BU Tel: 01989 566017 Fax: 01989 567815 www.mcsuk.org Registered Charity No: 1004005 Copyright text: Marine Conservation Society 2002 Reference: Marine Conservation Society (2002). Stackpole Quay Seasearch; 1993 to 1998. A report by Francis Bunker, MarineSeen, Estuary Cottage, Bentlass, Hundleton, Pembrokeshire, Wales, SA71 5RN. Further copies of this Full Report and the Summary Report for Stackpole Quay are available from the Marine Conservation Society. This report forms part of a project funded by PADI Project AWARE (UK) and the Countryside Council for Wales. PROTECT CoCuntgroysridefn Guwäd Alid!l~ II'~',all,,llZll~L I~−−−. for Wales Synopsis This Full Report and its accompanying Summary Report have been produced as part of a project undertaken by the Marine Conservation Society to provide feedback on the results of Seasearch dives carried out on the South Wales coast. This is a non−technical report, which compiles the findings of 33 Seasearch dives between West Moor Cliff and Broadhaven in south Pembrokeshire, Wales between 1993 and 1998. Location maps showing the dive sites are presented together with summary descriptions and detailed species lists for each site. Observations or features of interest encountered during the dives are noted. Diagrams showing the distribution of habitats and communities encountered during dives are given in several instances.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Systematics of the Sea Slug Genus Cyerce
    PHYLOGENETIC SYSTEMATICS OF THE SEA SLUG GENUS CYERCE BERGH, 1871 USING MOLECULAR AND MORPHOLOGICAL DATA A Project Presented to the Faculty of California State Polytechnic University, Pomona In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science In Biological Sciences By Karina Moreno 2020 SIGNATURE PAGE PROJECT: PHYLOGENETIC SYSTEMATICS OF THE SEA SLUG GENUS CYERCE BERGH, 1871 USING MOLECULAR AND MORPHOLOGICAL DATA AUTHOR: Karina Moreno DATE SUBMITTED: Summer 2020 Department of Biological Sciences Dr. Ángel Valdés _______________________________________ Project Committee Chair Department of Biological Sciences Dr. Elizabeth Scordato _______________________________________ Department of Biological Sciences Dr. Jayson Smith _______________________________________ Department of Biological Sciences ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank my research advisor, Dr Ángel Valdés; collaborators/advisors, Dr. Terrence Gosliner, Dr. Patrick Krug; thesis committee, Dr. Elizabeth Scordato, Dr. Jayson Smith; RISE advisors, Dr. Jill Adler, Dr. Nancy Buckley, Airan Jensen, Dr. Carla Stout for their support and guidance throughout this experience. I would also like to thank Elizabeth Kools (curator at California Academy of Sciences); California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco; Natural History Museum of Los Angeles; Western Australian Museum; Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris for loaning the material examined for this study. I would also like to thank Ariane Dimitris for donating specimens used in this study. The research presented here was funded by the National Institutes of Health MBRS-RISE Program and Biological Sciences graduate funds. Research reported in this publication was supported by the MENTORES (Mentoring, Educating, Networking, and Thematic Opportunities for Research in Engineering and Science) project, funded by a Title V grant, Promoting Post-Baccalaureate Opportunities for Hispanic Americans (PPOHA) | U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Mollusc World Magazine
    IssueMolluscWorld 24 November 2010 Glorious sea slugs Our voice in mollusc conservation Comparing Ensis minor and Ensis siliqua THE CONCHOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF GREAT BRITAIN AND IRELAND From the Hon. President Peter has very kindly invited me to use his editorial slot to write a piece encouraging more members to play an active part in the Society. A few stalwarts already give very generously of their time and energy, and we are enormously grateful to them; but it would be good to spread the load and get more done. Some of you, I know, don’t have enough time - at least at the moment - and others can’t for other reasons; but if you do have time and energy, please don’t be put off by any reluctance to get involved, or any feeling that you don’t know enough. There are many ways in which you can take part – coming to meetings, and especially field meetings; sending in records; helping with the records databases and the website; writing for our publications; joining Council; and taking on one of the officers’ jobs. None of us know enough when we start; but there’s a lot of experience and knowledge in the Society, and fellow members are enormously helpful in sharing what they know. Apart from learning a lot, you will also make new friends, and have a lot of fun. The Society plays an important part in contributing to our knowledge of molluscs and to mollusc conservation, especially through the database on the National Biodiversity Network Gateway (www.nbn.org.uk); and is important also in building positive links between professional and amateur conchologists.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Sea Life of Southeastern Alaska a Field Guide by Aaron Baldwin & Paul Norwood
    Common Sea Life of Southeastern Alaska A field guide by Aaron Baldwin & Paul Norwood All pictures taken by Aaron Baldwin Last update 08/15/2015 unless otherwise noted. [email protected] Table of Contents Introduction ….............................................................…...2 Acknowledgements Exploring SE Beaches …………………………….….. …...3 It would be next to impossible to thanks everyone who has helped with Sponges ………………………………………….…….. …...4 this project. Probably the single-most important contribution that has been made comes from the people who have encouraged it along throughout Cnidarians (Jellyfish, hydroids, corals, the process. That is why new editions keep being completed! sea pens, and sea anemones) ……..........................…....8 First and foremost I want to thanks Rich Mattson of the DIPAC Macaulay Flatworms ………………………….………………….. …..21 salmon hatchery. He has made this project possible through assistance in obtaining specimens for photographs and for offering encouragement from Parasitic worms …………………………………………….22 the very beginning. Dr. David Cowles of Walla Walla University has Nemertea (Ribbon worms) ………………….………... ….23 generously donated many photos to this project. Dr. William Bechtol read Annelid (Segmented worms) …………………………. ….25 through the previous version of this, and made several important suggestions that have vastly improved this book. Dr. Robert Armstrong Mollusks ………………………………..………………. ….38 hosts the most recent edition on his website so it would be available to a Polyplacophora (Chitons) …………………….
    [Show full text]
  • Gangliogenesis in the Prosobranch Gastropod Ilyanassa Obsoleta By
    Gangliogenesis in the Prosobranch Gastropod Ilyanassa obsoleta By: Miao-Fang Lin and Esther M. Leise Lin, M.-F. and Leise, E.M. (1996) Gangliogenesis in the Prosobranch Gastropod Ilyanassa obsoleta. Journal of Comparative Neurology 374(2):180-193. Made available courtesy of Wiley-Blackwell: The definitive version is available at http://www3.interscience.wiley.com ***Reprinted with permission. No further reproduction is authorized without written permission from Wiley-Blackwell. This version of the document is not the version of record. Figures and/or pictures may be missing from this format of the document.*** Abstract: We determined that the larval nervous system of Ilyanassa obsoleta contains paired cerebral, pleural, pedal, buccal, and intestinal ganglia and unpaired apical, osphradial, and visceral ganglia. We used a modified form of NADPH diaphorase histochemistry to compare the neuroanatomy of precompetent (including specimens 6, 8, and 12 days after hatching), competent, and metamorphosing larvae with postmetamorphic juveniles. This method highlighted ganglionic neuropils and allowed us to identify individual ganglia at various stages of development, thereby laying a foundation for concurrent histochemical studies. The first ganglia to form were the unpaired apical and osphradial ganglia and the paired cerebral and pedal ganglia. In larvae 6 days after hatching, the neuropil had already appeared in the apical and osphradial ganglia. Neuropil began to be apparent in the cerebral and pedal ganglia 2 days later. At that time, the pleural and buccal ganglia were identifiable and adjacent to the posterior edge of the cerebral ganglia. The ganglia of the visceral loop were concurrently recognizable, although the supraintestinal ganglion developed slightly earlier than the subintestinal and visceral ganglia.
    [Show full text]