DOCSLIB.ORG

Judicial Council Correspondence Table

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Judicial Council Collection Correspondence, 1962-1975, Folder No.: 1 of 14 ............................................................. 2 Correspondence, 1976-1977, Folder No.: 2 of 14 ............................................................. 8 Correspondence, 1978, Folder No.: 3 of 14.....................................................................21 Correspondence, 1979 (January –June), Folder No.: 4 of 14 ......................................... 32 Correspondence, 1979 (July-December), Folder No.: 5 of 14 ........................................ 41 Correspondence, 1980, Folder No.: 6 of 14....................................................................48 Correspondence, 1981, Folder No.: 7 of 14.................. .................................................. 60 Correspondence, 1982, Folder No.: 7 of 14....................................................................74 Correspondence, 1983, Folder No.: 8 of 14.....................................................................86 Correspondence, 1984, Folder No.: 8 of 14.... .............................................................. 107 Correspondence, 1985, Folder No.: 9 of 14.... .............................................................. 112 Correspondence, 1986, Folder No.: 9 of 14.... .............................................................. 121 Correspondence, 1987, Folder No.: 10 of 14.. .............................................................. 126 Correspondence, 1988, Folder No.: 10 of 14.. .............................................................. 135 Correspondence, 1989, Folder No.: 11 of 14.. .............................................................. 145 Correspondence, 1991, Folder No.: 12 of 14.. .............................................................. 165 Correspondence, 1992, Folder No.: 12 of 14.. .............................................................. 175 Correspondence, 1993, Folder No.: 13 of 14.. .............................................................. 188 Correspondence, 1994, Folder No.: 13 of 14.. .............................................................. 199 Judicial Council Collection Subject: Correspondence, 1962-1975 Folder No.: 1 of 14 1. Letter of June 18, 1962 from Henry A. Hillemann to David P. Jones regarding salaries of state trial judges. Accompanied by: letter of June 14, 1962 from David P. Jones to Legislative Reference Library; letter of June 29, 1962 from Earl Sachse to David P. Jones; and letter of May 21, 1962 from David P. Jones to Joint Legislative Council 2. Letter of October 8, 1964 from Henry A. Hillemann to James Sarres regarding the necessity of a county being uniform in its treatment of supplementary pay to county judges 3. Memo to all circuit judges of February 23, 1971 from Richard W. Bardwell regarding summer conference, accompanied by a list of Board of Circuit Judges of Wisconsin elected officers for 1971 4. Letter of August 3, 1971 from Glenn R. Coates to Lester C. Kohut regarding position of state director of family conciliation. Accompanied by: original letter of July 26, 1971 from Les Kohut to Chairman, judicial council and Mr. Wilson Brue regarding Legislation to create the position of state director of family conciliation; and No fault Divorce Brings No avalanche (newspaper article) 5. Letter of February 9, 1972 from Harland H. Hill to James Hough accompanied by list of Wisconsin state board of juvenile court judges – 1972 6. Memorandum of Agreement, June 12, 1972 between the Judicial council of the state of Wisconsin and Attorney James E. Hough 7. Letter of August 21, 1972 from William E. Gramling to Richard R. Malmgren 2 8. Letter of February 6, 1973 from Walter Harvey to Wm. F. Harvey. Accompanied by letter of February 6, 1973 from Walter L. Harvey to John H. Thill 9. Letter of March 7, 1973 from James A. Hanley to Richard R. Malmgren regarding Proposed Wisconsin Rules of Evidence Sec. 906.14 10. Letter of March 7, 1973 to Richard Malmgren. Accompanied by Advocate a Common Sense Approach to No-Fault Insurance by Carroll and James Heft 11. Letter of April 2, 1973 from Richard R. Malmgren to Gary Helgerson. Accompanied by letter of March 26, 1973 from Gary Helgerson to James Hough 12. Letter of May 7, 1973 from Roger L. Elmer to The Court Administrator 13. Letter of September 18, 1973 from Walter L. Harvey to Richard Malmgren. Accompanied by letter of September 17, 1973 from Richard R. Malmgren to Walter L. Harvey 14. Letter of January 8, 1974 from Richard R. Malmgren to Daniel T. Kelley 15. Letter of February 25, 1974 from Richard R. Malmgren to Alexander Hopp, accompanied by letter of February 6, 1974 from Alexander Hopp to Richard R. Malmgren 16. Letter of February 27, 1974 from Richard R. Malmgren to James Elauser 17. Letter of March 6, 1974 from Richard R. Malmgren to Anthony S. Earl 18. Letter of April 3, 1974 from Richard R. Malmgren to David J. Hase. Accompanied by memo of April 3, 1974 from Richard R. Malmgren regarding Assembly Bill 213; memo of April 3, 1974 from Richard R. Malmgren 3 regarding Assembly Bill 1076; and memo of April 3, 1974 from Richard R. Malmgren regarding Assembly Bill 1224 19. Letter of April 3, 1974 from Richard Malmgren to Mrs. William F. Hogan 20. Letter of June 19, 1974 from Richard R. Malmgren to John Bolgert 21. State Historical Society of Wisconsin User Property Loan List for Tim Watson, dated August 15, 1974 22. Letter of December 12, 1974 from John E. Conway to Members of Judicial Council regarding Revision so Statutes Dealing with Provisional Remedies 23. Letter of January 13, 1975 from Charles D. Clausen to Reuben W. Peterson, Jr. Accompanied by drafts for Section 802.10 Scheduling and Pretrial Conferences, 802.06 Defenses and Objection: When and How presented: by pleading or motion: motion for judgment on the pleading, 804.08(1)(a), 805.13(3) Instruction and verdict conference, 805.17Trial to the Court801.15(2)(b) 24. Letter of January 14, 1975 from Richard R. Malmgren to Members of Judicial Council 25. Press Release February 17, 1974 regarding Supreme Court of Wisconsin’s adoption of comprehensive rules of civil procedure governing the procedure to be followed in Wisconsin courts. 26. Letter of February 3, 1975 from Donald W. Steinmetz to Court Administrators Offices, Justice Horace W. Wilkie, State Bar of Wisconsin, and Richard R. Malmgren 4 27. Letter of March 13, 1975 from Richard R. Malmgren to Members of Judicial Council. Accompanied by section 11; and 1975 Assembly Joint Resolution 11 28. Letter of March 13, 1975 from Richard R. Malmgren to Members of Judicial Council accompanied by LRB-2362/1 “an Act to amend 66.12(3)(A), 288.195(1), 345.37(2) and 345.43(1)(a); and to repeal and recreate 300.20(1) of the statutes, relating to court costs in traffic ordinance forfeiture actions, entering pleas and demands for jury trial 29. LRB-25/78/1 “an Act to repeal 48.03(2) and (3), 48.04(3),…relating to revision of the children’s code 30. Letter of May 25, 1975 from Richard R. Malmgren to Members of Judicial Council regarding revisions to the Children’s Code 31. Letter of June 12, 1975 from Richard R. Malmgren to Members of Judicial Council regarding: final recommendations of the Evidence Committee for Wisconsin Rules of Videotape procedure 32. Letter of June 12, 1975 from Mark J. Farnum to Edwin C. Dahlberg 33. Letter of June 27, 1975 from Richard R. Malmgren to Reuben W. Peterson, Jr. Accompanied by petition in the matter of the modification Rules of Evidence and Section 895.40 of the statutes for the state of Wisconsin 34. Letter of October 1, 1975 from Richard R. Malmgren to Members of Judicial Council and Civil Rules, Evidence and General Projects Committees. Accompanied by In the matter of the modification of rules of civil procedure, promulgation of rules of videotape procedure, modification of rules of evidence, and amendment of section 895.40 of the Wisconsin statutes 5 35. Letter of October 10, 1975 from William A. Platz to Richard Malmgren regarding State’s Appeal in Criminal Cases 36. Letter of October 14, 1975 from William G. Lunney to Reuben Peterson 37. Draft and judicial council notes dated November 11, 1975 for 974.05(1). Accompanied by letter of October 31, 1974 form Richard R. Malmgren to William A. Platz; Draft and judicial council notes for 974.05(1); letter of October 29, 1075 from William A. Platz to Richard R. Malmgren; letter of October 27, 1975 from Richard R. Malmgren to William A. Platz with draft of 974.05(1) and Judicial Council Note; and letter of October 10, 1975 from William A. Platz to Richard Malmgren regarding State’s Appeal in Criminal Cases 38. Letter of December 2, 1975 from Richard R. Malmgren to John E. Conway. Accompanied by copies of Letter of December 11, 1975 from John E. Conway to Members of the Joint Judicial Council-State Bar of Wisconsin Provisional Remedies Committee regarding Policy on Provisional Remedies; and original (partially handwritten) version of December 11, 1975 letter from John E. Conway to Members of the Joint Judicial Council-State Bar of Wisconsin Provisional Remedies Committee regarding Policy on provisional remedies 39. Letter of December 11, 1975 from Richard R. Malmgren to Judicial Council members regarding final recommendations of the judicial council judge substitution and court commissioners committee regarding revisions to the Wisconsin statutes dealing with substitution or disqualification of a judge. 6 Accompanied by Drafts and judicial council notes for sections 76.22, 88.07, 103.60, 253.142(1)(b) and (3)256.19299.215, 300.05,
Recommended publications
  • Case No.: SC13-849 )

    Case No.: SC13-849 )

    SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Case No.: SC13-849 District Case No.: 3D12-3443 Lower Tribunal No.: 10-42068 HILDA SUAREZ, ORLANDO ) Fla. Bar No.: 480400 GARCIA, JR. and LISETTE ) GARCIA, ) Defendants/Appellants, ) v. ) CITIMORTGAGE, INC., ) ) Plaintiff/Appellee, ) INITIAL BRIEF Writ of Mandamus Gary Barcus, Esq. Attorney for Hilda Suarez, Orlando Garcia, Jr. and Lisette Garcia TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE I. Statement of the Case................................................... 1-3 II. Facts ....................................................................... 4-9 III. Issues to be Considered upon Appeal ................................. 10 1. Whether Appellee's Motion for Substitution of Party Plaintiff complies with Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.100 requiring it to "specify with particularity the grounds upon which the motion is based and set forth the relief or order sought." [The Author's Comments states: "These Requirements are mandatory.] 2. Whether Penny Mac Loan 2012 Trust NPL-1, who purchased the mortgage September, 2012, from PennyMac Mortgage Company LLC, which had purchased the mortgage from CitiMortgage, Inc. effective January 25, 2012, may be substituted as party plaintiff in this mortgage foreclosure even though it was NOT mentioned in the Motion for Substitution of Party Plaintiff? 3. Whether the Order ofNovember 30, 2012 denying the Motion to Dismiss the foreclosure lawsuit brought by CitiMortgage, Inc. should have been granted. IV. Analysis ofLaw ......................................................... 11-13 V. Conclusion ..............................................................
  • Margaret Farrow Wisconsin Women Making History

    Margaret Farrow Wisconsin Women Making History

    WISCONSIN THEIR STORIES WOMEN MAKING OUR LEGACY HISTORY www.womeninwisconsin.org MARGARET FARROW 1934-present City: Kenosha County: Kenosha Margaret Farrow was the first woman to serve as lieutenant governor in Wisconsin. Farrow attended Dominican Sisters of St. Catherine High School in Racine before going to Rosary College in Illinois. She earned a bachelor's degree in political science and education from Marquette University. She began her career in government as the trustee (1976-1981) and then the president (1981-1987) of Elm Grove Village. Farrow was elected to the Wisconsin State Assembly in 1986. Three years later, she was elected to the Wisconsin State Senate from a district comprising most of Waukesha county. She was re-elected in 1990, !1994, and 1998. In 2001, Farrow, a Republican, was appointed the 42nd lieutenant governor of Wisconsin after Scott McCallum, who had held that office, became governor upon the departure of Tommy Thompson. Farrow was the first woman to hold the office, which is the first leadership position in the line of succession after the governor of Wisconsin. Farrow spearheaded two statewide commissions to advance reforms that reduce the cost of government, and she played a leadership role in reforming welfare and tax policy to encourage work, saving, investment, innovation, capital formation, labor force productivity, and economic growth. She chaired the Wisconsin Women’s Council for several years and served as a member during her tenure as lieutenant governor. Farrow also chaired the governor’s work-based learning board and co-chaired the governor’s task force on invasive species. She has chaired the board of WisconsinEye, a public affairs television network; and in 2013, !she was appointed to the University of Wisconsin System Board of Regents.
  • The Third Branch, Summer 2003

    The Third Branch, Summer 2003

    Vol 11 No 3 H I G H L I G H T S Summer 2 Two state judges are finalists for 8Awards 2003 federal judgeship 11 People 5 Retirements 16 DCA returns from Persian Gulf 7 Building a better family court 22 Online juror qualification to be explored Appellate courts welcome new members Justice Patience Drake Roggensack vacancy created by the election of Judge Patience D. The Wisconsin Supreme Court welcomed Justice Patience Roggensack to the Supreme Court. Higginbotham will need D. “Pat” Roggensack on August 1. Roggensack won a 10- to seek election to a full, six-year term in April 2005. year term on the state’s high court in the April election. Higginbotham made a statewide name for himself in last Prior to joining the Supreme Court, Roggensack spent spring’s race for the open seat on the Wisconsin Supreme seven years on the Wisconsin Court of Appeals. She is the Court. Although he did not make it through the primary (he first judge from the Court of Appeals, which was created in received approximately 77,000 votes to Chief Judge Edward 1978, to serve on the R. Brunner’s 89,000 and now-Justice Patience D. a publication of the Wisconsin Judiciary a publication of the Wisconsin Supreme Court. Roggensack’s 108,000), he Moving over from the successfully raised his Court of Appeals with the profile and earned some new justice is Judicial glowing endorsements, Assistant Patti Gotrik. including one from the Roggensack’s law clerk will Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, be Atty. Lisa Mazzie, who which called him “bright, most recently worked as an thoughtful, and fair-minded.” investigator for the Office of In his nine years on the Lawyer Regulation.
  • Office of Lawyer Regulation Annual Report 2012-2013

    Office of Lawyer Regulation Annual Report 2012-2013

    REGULATION OF THE LEGAL PROFESSION IN WISCONSIN ________________________________________________________ FISCAL YEAR 2012-2013 __________________________________________________________________ Report of the Lawyer Regulation System Keith L. Sellen, Director Attorney Rod Rogahn, Chairperson Office of Lawyer Regulation Board of Administrative Oversight 110 East Main Street, Suite 315, Madison, WI 53703 (608) 267-7274 www.wicourts.gov/olr ANNUAL REPORT FISCAL YEAR 2012-2013 Introduction Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule (SCR) 21.03(6)(n) and 21.10(2)(e), the Office of Lawyer Regulation and Board of Administrative Oversight are filing this fiscal year 2012-2013 report on the lawyer regulation system. Composition of the Lawyer Regulation System “The lawyer regulation system is established to carry out the Supreme Court’s constitutional responsibility to supervise the practice of law and protect the public from misconduct by persons practicing law in Wisconsin.” SCR Chapter 21, Preamble. The composition and organization of the lawyer regulation system is depicted in Appendix 1. The persons currently serving in these organizations are identified in Appendix 2. Following is a description of the components. Supreme Court The Supreme Court supervises the lawyer regulation system, determines attorney misconduct and medical incapacity, and imposes discipline or directs other appropriate action in proceedings filed with the Court. Office of Lawyer Regulation The Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR) consists of the Director, investigative and support staff, litigation counsel, and retained counsel. The office has the following duties. • To receive and to respond to inquiries and grievances relating to attorneys. • To investigate allegations of attorney misconduct or medical incapacity. • To divert matters into an alternative to discipline program.
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 115 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION

    Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 115 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION

    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 115 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION Vol. 164 WASHINGTON, WEDNESDAY, APRIL 11, 2018 No. 58 House of Representatives The House met at 10 a.m. and was don’t think it is the investigation that wears a tan suit or salutes a marine called to order by the Speaker pro tem- is closing in on the President, but rath- while holding a cup of coffee, that is a pore (Mr. BACON). er his disgraceful reaction to it. constitutional crisis. But when the We now know, without any doubt, f President threatens to fire the special that the special counsel’s investigation counsel, well, you know. DESIGNATION OF SPEAKER PRO is closing in on the President and those We cannot rely on Republicans to de- TEMPORE very, very close to him. I don’t think fend democracy and our system of gov- The SPEAKER pro tempore laid be- lawful warrants legally executed ernment as long as they find political fore the House the following commu- against the homes, office, and hotel and personal advantage in walking nication from the Speaker: rooms of the President’s chief fixer and lockstep with the President, or they fellow grifter are the problem. tremble in fear of what would be in a WASHINGTON, DC, April 11, 2018. Rather, it is the constant threats to tweet if they stepped out of line. I hereby appoint the Honorable DON BACON further obstruct justice by a sitting And we as Democrats, well, we are in to act as Speaker pro tempore on this day.
  • 'The Laws Are Yours" Is the Latest in a Series of Projects Undertaken by the Lawyers' Wives of Wisconsin to Further Public

    'The Laws Are Yours" Is the Latest in a Series of Projects Undertaken by the Lawyers' Wives of Wisconsin to Further Public

    Appendix 29 1 'The Laws Are Yours" is the latest in a series of projects undertaken by the Lawyers' Wives of Wisconsin to further public understanding of the law and of the legal profession . Lawyers' Wives of Wisconsin has approximately 1400 members in 24 charter county groups throughout the state. Among their varied activities are Law Day observances, welcoming of newly naturalized citizens and the recently completed law-related education program, "You and the Law." A scholarship for a law student is presented annually to each Law School in Wisconsin. We hope that you, the reader, will have a better understanding of the Wisconsin legal system after reading "The Laws Are Yours." We have not attempted to answer specific questions about the law since facts, situations, circumstances and persons differ and the application of the law to such cases may also vary. For specific answers to legal advice it is suggested that you consult a lawyer in your community. We would appreciate your comments: Please send them to: Lawyers' Wives of Wisconsin c/o 4001 Haven Avenue Racine, Wisconsin, 53405 1979 Appendix 29 2 INTRODUCTION We live in a land of freedom, free to do as we wish and to go where we please, as long as we do not infringe on the rights of others. It has been said that one's right to swing his fist ends at the point where the other fellow's nose begins. Law began when man discovered he could not live alone - that there had to be rules in order for people to live together.
  • Substitution Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(D): Mootness and Related Problems

    Substitution Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(D): Mootness and Related Problems

    Substitution Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(d): Mootness and Related Problems Although private suits against the government may be barred by the doctrine of sovereign immunity,' it has long been recognized that in certain circumstances a private litigant may seek equitable relief "intrinsically against the government" by naming a govern- ment officer as defendant.' These cases present particular difficul- ties when the named defendant, for whatever reason, leaves office during the course of the litigation and is succeeded. At common law, a successor could not be substituted as defendant in a suit that had been brought against the predecessor in his official capacity unless a statute or court rule permitted the substitution;' the action was said to abate.4 A plaintiff thwarted by a succession in office would thus have to begin the litigation anew in order to acquire the desired relief.5 Since the subsequent suit generally involved the relitigation of numerous issues,' the abatement doctrine has been widely and properly criticized for causing the waste of both judicial and per- 7 sonal resources. 1 See generally 3 K. DAvis, ADMINISTRATIVE LAW TREATISE §§ 27.01-27.05, 27.09 (1958). 2 E.g., Philadelphia Co. v. Steinson, 223 U.S. 605 (1912); Ex parte Young, 209 U.S. 123 (1908). See generally Davis, Sovereign Immunity in Suits Against Officers for Relief Other than Damages, 40 CORNELL L.Q. 3 (1954); Block, Suits Against Officers and the Sovereign Immunity Doctrine, 59 HARV. L. REv. 1060 (1946). 3 See, e.g., United States ex rel. Bernadin v. Butterworth, 169 U.S.
  • BMB40 Oct04.Pub

    BMB40 Oct04.Pub

    Big Money Bulletin Truth in campaigning takes one on the chin On September 1, the state Elections Board rejected by one vote the proposed Inside truth-in-campaigning rule written by the Wisconsin Democracy Campaign, once again refusing to close the gaping loophole in Wisconsin’s campaign Page 2 finance laws allowing special interest campaign ads to escape disclosure WDC outs outsourcing deal requirements and campaign contribution limits. Despite overwhelming public Insiders have $9-$1 edge support for campaign finance disclosure as evidenced by the 2000 referendum where 90 percent of voters supported full and prompt disclosure of all election- Page 3 related activities, the Elections Board voted down the disclosure rule 5-4. Bogus polls Page 4 The deciding vote against the rule was cast by Martha Love, the Democratic A People’s Legislature Party of Wisconsin's appointee to the board. Love previously had voted three times to move forward with the rulemaking – once in January and two more times in March – before reversing course on the vote for final approval. Another Democratic appointee who had appeared to be wavering in his support of the disclosure rule, the Assembly Democratic leader’s designee Carl Holborn, ultimately voted in favor of the rule. The Democracy Campaign sent letters calling for a new vote on the proposed truth-in-campaigning rule requiring full disclosure of special interest campaign ads to Governor Jim Doyle, the state chair of the Democratic Party of Wisconsin and the flip-flopping party appointee to the state Elections Board who cast the key vote rejecting the disclosure rule.
  • Bridging the Distance: Implementing Videoconferencing in Wisconsin Manual

    Bridging the Distance: Implementing Videoconferencing in Wisconsin Manual

    Bridging the Distance: Implementing Videoconferencing in Wisconsin Revised: August 2017 Prepared by: Wisconsin Supreme Court Planning and Policy Advisory Committee Videoconferencing Subcommittee Planning and Policy Advisory Committee Chief Justice Patience Drake Roggensack, Chair 16 East State Capitol P.O. Box 1688 Madison, WI 53701 This page is intentionally left blank. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword ..................................................................................................................................................... 3 PPAC Videoconferencing Subcommittee Members 2017 .......................................................................... 4 Section I. What is Videoconferencing? .................................................................................................... 5 Potential Benefits ................................................................................................................................ 5 Implementation Considerations .......................................................................................................... 5 Non-Courtroom Uses of Videoconferencing ...................................................................................... 5 Section II. Planning for Successfully Implementing Videoconferencing ............................................... 7 Implementation Considerations .......................................................................................................... 7 Videoconferencing and Electronic Filing ..........................................................................................
  • Milwaukee Mayor Throws Hat in Ring with Upcoming Recall Election of Governor by DANIEL BICE, LARRY SANDLER and PATRICK MARLEY MILWAUKEE, Wis

    Milwaukee Mayor Throws Hat in Ring with Upcoming Recall Election of Governor by DANIEL BICE, LARRY SANDLER and PATRICK MARLEY MILWAUKEE, Wis

    Saturday, March 31, 2012 Milwaukee mayor throws hat in ring with upcoming recall election of governor By DANIEL BICE, LARRY SANDLER and PATRICK MARLEY MILWAUKEE, Wis. — It took a little while, but Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett has finally decided whether to run in the upcoming recall election. He’s in. In a Friday afternoon e-mail to supporters, Barrett, who has twice run unsuccessfully for governor, announced that he will be making a third bid for the state’s highest office as part of the recall election of Gov. Scott Walker. “We need to bring our state back,” Barrett wrote in the note. “Wisconsin needs a governor who is focused on jobs, not ideology; a leader committed to bringing our state together and healing political wounds, not pitting people against each other and catering to the special interests. “This is the governor I will be for the people of Wisconsin.” Barrett’s candidacy will have an immediate impact. “His candidacy is a game-changer,” said Jim Palmer, head of the Wisconsin Professional Police Association, which has yet to endorse a candidate. “The candidates who have been in the race so far have not drawn a lot of excitement.” The mayor’s decision to run sets up a possible rematch of the 2010 gubernatorial election. In that race, Walker, a Wauwatosa Republican, defeated the Democratic mayor by 52 percent-47 percent. Barrett’s much-anticipated announcement came just hours after state elections officials officially ordered the recall contest, making Walker the third governor in the nation to face a recall and Rebecca Kleefisch the first lieutenant governor to face one.
  • Marquette Lawyer Spring 2009 Marquette University Law Alumni Magazine

    Marquette Lawyer Spring 2009 Marquette University Law Alumni Magazine

    Marquette Lawyer Spring 2009 Marquette University Law Alumni Magazine Marquette Lawyers On the Front Lines of Justice Also Inside: Doyle, Lubar, McChrystal, O’Scannlain, Rofes, Sykes, Twerski Marquette University Rev. Robert A. Wild, S.J. TABLE OF CONTENTS President John J. Pauly Provost 3 From the Dean Gregory J. Kliebhan Senior Vice President 4 Marquette Lawyers On the Front Lines of Justice Marquette University Law School 1 2 A Conversation with Mike McChrystal on Eckstein Hall Joseph D. Kearney Dean and Professor of Law [email protected] 1 8 2008 Commencement Ceremonies (414) 288-1955 Peter K. Rofes 2 2 Law School News Associate Dean for Academic Affairs and Professor of Law 2 6 Public Service Report Michael M. O’Hear Associate Dean for Research and Professor of Law 3 7 Alumni Association: President’s Letter and Annual Awards Bonnie M. Thomson Associate Dean for Administration 4 1 Alumni Class Notes and Profiles Jane Eddy Casper Assistant Dean for Students 5 5 McKay Award Remarks: Prof. Aaron D. Twerski Daniel A. Idzikowski Robert C. McKay Law Professor Award Assistant Dean for Public Service Paul D. Katzman 5 8 Rotary Club Remarks: Sheldon B. Lubar Assistant Dean for Career Planning Devolution of Milwaukee County Government Sean Reilly Assistant Dean for Admissions 6 4 Bar Association Speech: Hon. Diane S. Sykes Christine Wilczynski-Vogel The State of Judicial Selection in Wisconsin Assistant Dean for External Relations [email protected] 7 4 Hallows Lecture: Hon. Diarmuid F. O’Scannlain Marquette Lawyer is published by Lawmaking and Interpretation: The Role of a Federal Marquette University Law School.
  • It's My Party and I'll Cry If I Want To": State Intrusions Upon the Associational Freedoms of Political Parties -- Democratic Party of the United States V

    It's My Party and I'll Cry If I Want To": State Intrusions Upon the Associational Freedoms of Political Parties -- Democratic Party of the United States V

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Indiana University Bloomington Maurer School of Law Maurer School of Law: Indiana University Digital Repository @ Maurer Law Articles by Maurer Faculty Faculty Scholarship 1983 "It's My Party and I'll Cry If I Want To": State Intrusions upon the Associational Freedoms of Political Parties -- Democratic Party of the United States v. Wisconsin ex rel. La Follette Charles G. Geyh Indiana University Maurer School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/facpub Part of the American Politics Commons, Law and Politics Commons, and the State and Local Government Law Commons Recommended Citation Geyh, Charles G., ""It's My Party and I'll Cry If I Want To": State Intrusions upon the Associational Freedoms of Political Parties -- Democratic Party of the United States v. Wisconsin ex rel. La Follette" (1983). Articles by Maurer Faculty. Paper 877. http://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/facpub/877 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles by Maurer Faculty by an authorized administrator of Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. "IT'S MY PARTY AND I'LL CRY IF I WANT TO": STATE INTRUSIONS UPON THE ASSOCIATIONAL FREEDOMS OF POLITICAL PARTIES-DEMOCRATIC PARTY OF THE UNITED STATES V. WISCONSIN EX REL. LA FOLLETTE In 1897, shortly before he became governor of Wisconsin, Rob- ert M.