DOCSLIB.ORG

Contents (Click on Index Item to Locate)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Contents (Click on Index Item to Locate) Contents (Click on index item to locate) Subject Page Foreword iii Introductory Note xi Statement of Information 1 Statement of Information and Supporting Evidentiary Material - Part 1 85 NOTE: Book III is published in two parts. Part 1 contains the entire statement of information and supporting evidentiary material for paragraphs 1-47. Part 2 contains copies of paragraphs 48-75 and the supporting evidentiary material for those paragraphs. STATEMENT OWES INFORMATION HEARINGS COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES NINETY-THIRD CONGRESS SECOND SESSION PURSUANT TO H. Res. 803 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY TO INVESTIGATE WHETHER SUFFICIENT GROUNDS EXIST FOR THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES TO EXERCISE ITS CONSTITUTIONAL POWER TO IMPEACH RICHARD M. NIXON PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Boo)k III—Part 1 EVENTS FOLLOWING THE WATERGATE BREAK-IN June 20, 1972 March 22, 1973 31 AY-J UNE 1974 35-905 o U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON: 1974 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, 1) C. 20402 - Price $11.50 per set COMMITTEE O?< THE JUDICIARY PETER W. RODINO, JR., New Jersey, Chairman HAROLD D. DONOHUE, Massachusetts JACK BROOKS, Texas ROBERT W. KASTENMEIER, Wisconsin DON EDWARDS, California WILLIAM L. HUNGATE, Missouri JOHN CONYERS, JR., Michigan JOSHUA EILBERG, Pennsylvania JEROME R. WALDIE, California WALTER FLOWERS, Alabama JAMES R. MANN, South Carolina PAUL S. SARBANES, Maryland JOHN F. SEIBERLING, Ohl) GEORGE E. DANIELSON, California ROBERT F. DRINAN, Massachusetts CHARLES B. RANGEL, New York BARBARA JORDAN, Texas RAY THORNTON, Arkansas ELIZABETH HOLTZMAN, New York WAYNE OWENS, Utah EDWARD MEZVINS? Y. Iowa EDWARD HUTCHINSON, Michigan ROBERT McCLORY, Illinois HENRY P. SMITH III, New York CHARLES W. SANDMAN, JR., New Jersey TOM RAII,SBACK, Illinois CHARLES E. WIGGINS, California DAVID W. DENNIS, Indiana HAMILTON FISH, JR., New York WILEY MAYNE, Iowa LAWRENCE J. HOGAN, Maryland M. CALDWELL BUTLER, Virginia WILLIAM S. COHEN, Maine TRENT LOTT, Mississippi HAROLD V. FROEHLICH, Wisconsin CARLOS J. I\IOORHEAD, California JOSEPH J. MARAZITI, New Jersey DELBERT L. LATTA, Ohio JOIIN HOARD Special counsel ALBERT E. JENNER, Jr., Special Counsel 10 the Minority JOSEPH A. WOODS, Jr,, Senior Associate Special Counsel RlcHAnD CATES, Senior Associate Special Counsel BERNARD TV. Nt.SSBAUM, Senior Associate Special Colineel ROBERT D. SACK, Senior Associate Special Counsel ROBERT A. SHELTON, Associate Special Counsel SAMUEL GARRISON III, Deputy Minority Counsel FRED H. ALTSHULER, Counsel THOMAS BELL, Counsel W. PArL BISHOP, Counsel ROBERT L. BROWN, Counsel MICHAEL M. CONWAY, Counsel R1TFrs CORMIER, Special Assistant E. LEE DALE, Counsel JOHN B. DAVIDSON, Counsel EVAN A. DAVIS, Counsel CONSTANTINE J. GERAS, CoU118 RICHARD H. GILL, Counsel I)AaMAR HAMILTON, Cou)lefsl DAVID HANES, Special Assistant JOHN E. KENNAHAN, Counsel TERRY R. KIRKPATRICK, Counsel JOHN R. LAROVITZ, Counsel LAtlRANCE LUCCHINO, Counsel R. L. SMITH MCKEITHEN, Counsel (11) ALAN MARER, Counsel ROBERT P. MURPHY, Counsel JAMES B. F. OLIPHANT, Counsel RICHARD H. PORTER, Counsel GEORGE RAYBORN, Counsel JAMES REX M, Counsel HILLARY D. ROD11AM, Counsel STEPHEN A. SHARP, Counsel JARED STANlELL, Counsel ROSCOE 11. STARES III, Counsel GARY W. SUTTON, Counsel EDWARD S. SZrliELEWICZ, Counsel ROBERT J. TRAINER, Counsel J. STEPHEN WALKER, Coltesel BEN A. WALLIS, JR., Counsel WILLIAM WELD, Counsel WILLIAM A. WHITE, Counsel FOREWORD By Hon. Peter W. Rodino, Jr., Chairman, Committee on the Judiciary On February 6, 1974, the House of Representatives adopted by a vote of 410-4 the following House Resolution 803: RESOLVED, That the Committee on the Judiciary acting as a whole or by any subcommittee thereof appointed by the Chairman for the purposes hereof and in accordance with the Rules of the Committee, is authorized and directed to investigate fully and completely whether sufficient grounds exist for the House of Representatives to exercise its constitutional power to impeach Richard M. Nixon, President of the United States of America. The committee shall report to the House of Representatives such resolutions, articles of impeachment, or other recommendations as it deems proper. Beginning in November 1973, acting under resolutions referred to the Committee by the Speaker of the House and with a special appropriation, I had begun to organize a special staff to investigate serious charges against the President of the United States. On May 9, 1974, as Chairman of the Committee on the Judiciary, I convened the Committee for hearings to review the results of the Impeachment Inquiry staff's investigation. The staff began its initial presentation the same day, in executive session, pursuant to the Committee's Impeachment Inquiry Procedures adopted on May 2, 1974. By June 21, the Inquiry staff had concluded its initial presen tation . On June 25, the Committee voted to make public the initial presentation including substantially all of the supporting material (111) —2— presented at the hearings. The Committee also voted to make public the President's response, which was presented to:) the Committee on June 27 and June 28 in the same form and manner as the Inquiry staff's initial presentation. l Statements of information and supporting evidentiary material were compiled by the Inquiry staff in 36 notebooks and furnished in this form to each Member of the Committee. The notebooks presented material on several subjects of the Inquiry: the Watergate break-in and its aftermath, ITT, dairy price supports, domestic surveillance, abuse of the IRS, and the activities of the Special Prosecutors. The staff also presented to the Committee written reports on President Nixon's income taxes, Presidential impoundment of funds appropriated by Congress, and the bombing of Cambodia. Fifteen notebooks were furnished to the Members of the Committee relating to the Watergate break-in on June 17, 1972 and to events following the break-in, through April 30, 1973. In each notebook a statement of information relating to a particular phase of the investigation was immediately followed by supporting evidentiary material, which included copies of documents and testimony (much already on public record), transcripts of Presidential conversations and affidavits. The fifteen volumes relating to the Watergate phase of the Inquiry were divided into four books, as follows: Book I - Events Prior to the Watergate Break-In 12/2/71 - 6/17/72 Book II - Events Following the Watergate Break-In 6/17/72 - 2/9/73 (IV) Book III - Events Following the Watergate Break- In 6/20/72 - 3/22/73 Book IV - Events Following the Watergate Break-In 3/22/73 - 4/30/73 Book I dealt with events prior to the Watergate break-in. Book II dealt with allegations involving Presidential interference with the official Department of Justice investigation. Book III dealt with allegations concerning payments of "hush" money to Watergate defendants to insure their silence, offers of leniency and executive clemency, and the instigating or making of false statements to persons connected with an official investigation of Watergate; Book III also included a chronology of events between February 9 and March 22, 1973. Book IV dealt with events relating to the President's investigation of the Watergate break-in and alleged cover-up between March 22 and April 30, 1973. Every effort was made to preclude inferences in the presentation of this material. A deliberate and scrupulous abstention from conclusions, even by implication, was observed. With respect to the Presidential recorded conversations, the Committee determined to hear the recorded conversations in their entirety. The Presidential recorded conversations were neither paraphrased nor summarized by the Inquiry staff. Thus, no inferences, or conclusions were drawn for the Committee. During the course of the hearings, Members of the Committee heard each recording and simultaneously followed transcripts prepared by the Inquiry staff. Each of (v) —4— these transcripts is reprinted under the appropriate Statement of Information. During the course of the hearings, the Committee found it necessary to issue four subpoenas to President Richard Nixon requiring tape recordings of 98 Presidential conversations as well as all papers and things prepared by, sent to, received by, or at any time contained in the files of H. R. Haldeman, John D. Ehrlichman, Charles W. Colson, John Dean, III, and Gordon Strachan to the extent that such papers or things related or referred directly or indirectly to the break-in and electronic surveillance of the Democratic National Committee Headquarters in the Watergate office building during May and June of 1972 or the investigations of that break-in by the Department of Justice, the Senate Select Committee on Presidential Campaign Activities, or any other legislative, judicial, executive or administrative body, including members of the White House staff. The Committee also subpoenaed the President's daily diaries (logs of Presidential meetings, telephone calls, and other activities) for the periods April through July 1972, February through April 1973, July 12 through July 31, 1973 and October 1973. In response to these subpoenas, the President furnished only edited White House transcripts of 31 of the subpoenaed conversations between March 17 and April 18, 1973. These edited transcripts were summarized by the Inquiry staff and made a part of the evidentiary material presented to the Committee.
Load more
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...

956 pages remaining, click to load more.

Recommended publications
  • The Rise and Fall of Richard Nixon
    T H E R I S E A N D F A L L O F... The Rise and Fall of Richard Nixon What events influenced Richard Nixon’s rise to and fall from power? Introduction This photograph was taken of vice presidential candidate Richard Nixon relaxing with his pet dog, Checkers, in 1952. In his famous “Checkers” speech, Nixon refuted accusations that he had misused campaign contributions. He emphasized his family’s modest means, claiming that his wife, Pat, wore not a mink coat but “a respectable Republican cloth coat.” On September 23, 1952, California senator Richard Nixon reserved a spot on television to deliver the most important speech of his career. With this address, Nixon hoped to squash rumors that he had accepted $18,000 in illegal political contributions to finance personal expenses. The Republicans had recently nominated Nixon to run for vice president on Dwight D. Eisenhower’s ticket. When these charges against Nixon became public, Eisenhower was noncommittal — he did not drop Nixon from the ticket, but he also did not defend him. In his speech, Nixon said, “Not one cent of the $18,000 or any other money of that type ever went to me for my personal use. Every penny of it was used to pay for political expenses that I did not think should be charged to the taxpayers of the © 2020 Teachers' Curriculum Institute Level: A T H E R I S E A N D F A L L O F... United States.” But, he did confess to accepting one personal gift: A man down in Texas heard [my wife] Pat on the radio mention the fact that our two youngsters would like to have a dog.
    [Show full text]
  • A List of the Records That Petitioners Seek Is Attached to the Petition, Filed Concurrently Herewith
    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IN RE PETITION OF STANLEY KUTLER, ) AMERICAN HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION, ) AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR LEGAL HISTORY, ) Miscellaneous Action No. ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN HISTORIANS, ) and SOCIETY OF AMERICAN ARCHIVISTS. ) ) MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF PETITION FOR ORDER DIRECTING RELEASE OF TRANSCRIPT OF RICHARD M. NIXON’S GRAND JURY TESTIMONY OF JUNE 23-24, 1975, AND ASSOCIATED MATERIALS OF THE WATERGATE SPECIAL PROSECUTION FORCE Professor Stanley Kutler, the American Historical Association, the American Society for Legal History, the Organization of American Historians, and the Society of American Archivists petition this Court for an order directing the release of President Richard M. Nixon’s thirty-five-year- old grand jury testimony and associated materials of the Watergate Special Prosecution Force.1 On June 23-24, 1975, President Nixon testified before two members of a federal grand jury who had traveled from Washington, DC, to San Clemente, California. The testimony was then presented in Washington, DC, to the full grand jury that had been convened to investigate political espionage, illegal campaign contributions, and other wrongdoing falling under the umbrella term Watergate. Watergate was the defining event of Richard Nixon’s presidency. In the early 1970s, as the Vietnam War raged and the civil rights movement in the United States continued its momentum, the Watergate scandal ignited a crisis of confidence in government leadership and a constitutional crisis that tested the limits of executive power and the mettle of the democratic process. “Watergate” was 1A list of the records that petitioners seek is attached to the Petition, filed concurrently herewith.
    [Show full text]
  • The President's
    Afterword AS SENATOR Sam Ervin completed his 20-year Senate career in 1974 and issued his final report as chairman of the Senate Watergate committee, he posed the question: “What was Watergate?” Countless answers have been offered in the 40 years since June 17, 1972, when a team of burglars wearing business suits and rubber gloves was arrested at 2:30 A.M. at the headquarters of the Democratic Party in the Watergate office building in Washington. Four days afterward, the Nixon White House offered its answer: “Certain elements may try to stretch this beyond what it was,” press secretary Ronald Ziegler scoffed, dismissing the incident as a “third-rate burglary.” History proved that it was anything but. Two years later, Richard Nixon would become the first and only U.S. president to resign, his role in the criminal conspiracy to obstruct justice—the Watergate cover-up— definitively established. Another answer has since persisted, often unchallenged: the notion that the cover-up was worse than the crime. This idea minimizes the scale and reach of Nixon’s criminal actions. Ervin’s answer to his own question hints at the magnitude of Watergate: “To destroy, insofar as the presidential election of 1972 was concerned, the integrity of the process by which the President of the United States is nominated and elected.” Yet Watergate was far more than that. At its most virulent, Watergate was a brazen and daring assault, led by Nixon himself, against the heart of American democracy: the Constitution, our system of free elections, the rule of law. 337 Woodward_AllThePresidents_4P_yc.indd 337 4/2/14 2:28 PM 338 : AFTERWORD Today, much more than when we first covered this story as young Wash- ington Post reporters, an abundant record provides unambiguous answers and evidence about Watergate and its meaning.
    [Show full text]
  • John Mitchell and the Crimes of Watergate Reconsidered Gerald Caplan Pacific Cgem Orge School of Law
    University of the Pacific Scholarly Commons McGeorge School of Law Scholarly Articles McGeorge School of Law Faculty Scholarship 2010 The akM ing of the Attorney General: John Mitchell and the Crimes of Watergate Reconsidered Gerald Caplan Pacific cGeM orge School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/facultyarticles Part of the Legal Biography Commons, and the President/Executive Department Commons Recommended Citation 41 McGeorge L. Rev. 311 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the McGeorge School of Law Faculty Scholarship at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in McGeorge School of Law Scholarly Articles by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact mgibney@pacific.edu. Book Review Essay The Making of the Attorney General: John Mitchell and the Crimes of Watergate Reconsidered Gerald Caplan* I. INTRODUCTION Shortly after I resigned my position as General Counsel of the District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department in 1971, I was startled to receive a two-page letter from Attorney General John Mitchell. I was not a Department of Justice employee, and Mitchell's acquaintance with me was largely second-hand. The contents were surprising. Mitchell generously lauded my rather modest role "in developing an effective and professional law enforcement program for the District of Columbia." Beyond this, he added, "Your thoughtful suggestions have been of considerable help to me and my colleagues at the Department of Justice." The salutation was, "Dear Jerry," and the signature, "John." I was elated. I framed the letter and hung it in my office.
    [Show full text]
  • Deep Suspicion
    Deep Suspicion Question: Question: There probably will always be mysteries The charge has been made that President As far as the war in Vietnam is concerned, surrounding “Watergate,” the web of scan- Nixon could have made the Vietnam peace do you think President Nixon has been dals that brought down the presidency of settlement long ago and that he delayed it frank and straightforward about the war, or Richard M. Nixon. We still don’t know just to help his reelection. Do you agree or do you think he has not told the American who “Deep Throat” was, or exactly what disagree with this charge? people the real truth about the situation Nixon knew and when he knew it. there? As Watergate unfolded between 1972 and 1974, with such secrets only gradually com- ing to light, the public began to harbor Agree Frank, straight- doubts about how much they could trust 38% 35% Has not Disagree forward this president, in matters touching many 52% 53% told the aspects both of his personal dealings and his truth dealings with the American people. 10% 12% No opinion Not sure Source: Survey by the Opinion Research Corporation, October Source: Survey by Louis Harris and Associates, February 27-29, 1972. One of a series of surveys conducted for Richard 1972. Nixon while he was president. Question: Question: Do you feel President Nixon has been honest or not about the [Let me read you some statements about President Nixon’s releasing financing of his houses in San Clemente and Key Biscayne? information about his income and the taxes he has paid.
    [Show full text]
  • John Dean White House Docttuaenhs
    WATERGATE S.PEC1AL PROSECUTION FORCE DEPARTMENT OF JL<,I .CE Memorandum PN.K : s fk FROM Peter M. Kreindle’~~ Counse! to the Special Prosecutor SUBJECT: John Dean White House Docttuaenhs. This is in response to your memorand~l of February 24, 1975, inquiring into the status of Mr. Mortenson’s request to John Dean that he return to the White House all xerox copies of documents from his files. Mr. Mortenson made this request in a letter, which I fo~.¢arded to Mr. Dean. I also gave Mr. Dean a copy of Judge Richey’s /~uended Order. I believe that Mr. Dean does not interpret this Order to require him to return the documents. .Although I would reach a different conclusion than Mr. Dean, Judge Richey’s order is sufficiently ambiguous to prevent Mr. Dean being subject to any sanctions for failing to return the copies. It is clear, however, that we have no obligation to affirmatively seek the return of the documents. I specifically instructed Mr. Akerman not to look at the documents or to make copies of them, and to the best o~ my knowledge, he ha~ not done so. Mr. Mortenson is aware of all of these circumstances. ~EPRODUCED AT THE NATIONAL ARCHIVES WATERGATE SPECIA L PROSECUTION FORCE Memorandum TO : Henry Ruth J~y Horow. itz Tom McBride Rich Davls William Merrill Peter Kriendler Joseph Connolly HG:n°rr~eHeFcr SUBJECT:. Dean Subpoena John Dean has asked that we give him a subpoena covering material in his possessi6n relevant to our investigations. The attached draft of on Dean on Monday, unless additions in the language covering your area.
    [Show full text]
  • 46-22-HR Haldeman
    Richard Nixon Presidential Library Contested Materials Collection Folder List Box Number Folder Number Document Date No Date Subject Document Type Document Description 46 22 Campaign Memo National Archives and Records Administration Document Control Sheet. Listed as entry number one for Box 46, Folder 22 of the Contested Materials collection. 2 pgs. 46 22 9/18/1972Campaign Memo From Haldeman to Chapin RE: scheduling the First Family during the campaign season. Handwritten notes added by unknown. 2 pgs. 46 22 9/6/1972Campaign Memo From Haldeman to Chapin RE: scheduling Ed Cox's events. Handwritten note added by unknown. 1 pg. 46 22 8/10/1972Campaign Memo From Haldeman to Chapin RE: Wally Hickel's seconding the nomination of RN in the 1972 campaign. Handwritten note added by unknown. 1 pg. 46 22 Campaign Memo National Archives and Records Administration Document Control Sheet. Listed as entry number two for Box 46, Folder 21 of the Contested Materials collection. 1 pg. 46 22 7/27/1972Campaign Memo From Haldeman to Chapin RE: celebrity support for RN. Handwritten note added by unknown. 1 pg. Monday, March 26, 2012 Page 1 of 2 Box Number Folder Number Document Date No Date Subject Document Type Document Description 46 22 7/20/1972Campaign Memo From Higby to Chapin and Parker RE: campaign "Q&A"s and use of RN's daughters and Rose Woods during the campaign. 1 pg. 46 22 6/23/1972Campaign Memo From Haldeman to Parker RE: controlling smaller campaign events. 1 pg. 46 22 4/5/1972Campaign Memo From Haldeman to Chapin RE: Tex McCrary's role in the campaign.
    [Show full text]
  • Finding Aid for the HR Haldeman Collection
    Guide to the H. R. Haldeman Collection (1956-1978) Richard Nixon Presidential Library and Museum Contact Information Richard Nixon Presidential Library and Museum ATTN: Archives 18001 Yorba Linda Boulevard Yorba Linda, California 92886 Phone: (714) 983-9120 Fax: (714) 983-9111 E-mail: nixon@nara.gov Processed by: Meghan Lee Date Completed: 2005 Table Of Contents Descriptive Summary 3 Administrative Information 4 Biography 5 Scope and Content Summary 6 Related Collections 6 Container List 7 2 Descriptive Summary Title: H. R. Haldeman Collection Creator: H. R. Haldeman Repository: Richard Nixon Presidential Library and Museum 18001 Yorba Linda Boulevard Yorba Linda, California 92886 Abstract: The H.R. Haldeman collection consists of campaign materials, a minimal amount of material from the White House, papers from the civil trials involving H.R. Haldeman, and transcripts and notes from the case United States of America v. John N. Mitchell, et al. 3 Administrative Information Access: Open Publication Rights: Copyright held by Richard Nixon Library and Birthplace Foundation Preferred Citation: Folder title. Box #. The H.R. Haldeman Collection. Richard Nixon Library and Birthplace Foundation, Yorba Linda, CA. Acquisition Information: Donated by H.R. Haldeman Processing History: Susan Naulty began processing the collection in 1993. The photographs were housed in archival folders and placed with the photograph collection. Meghan Lee completed the arrangement of the collection and proceeded to review and describe the collection, which was completed in 2005. 4 Biography Harry Robbins (“Bob”) Haldeman, the son of a successful businessman, was born in Los Angeles, California, on October 27th, 1926. He attended the University of Redlands and the University of Southern California.
    [Show full text]
  • WHSF: SMOF: Dwight Chapin: Republican National Convention
    Richard Nixon Presidential Library Contested Materials Collection Folder List Box Number Folder Number Document Date No Date Subject Document Type Document Description 2 70 8/2/1972Domestic Policy Memo From Mark Goode to Chapin and Bill Henkel RE: video tape machine for RN's Miami home. 1 pg. 2 70 7/18/1972Campaign Memo From Chapin to Haldeman RE: Republican National Convention planning. 10 pgs. 2 70 7/16/1972Campaign Other Document Planned keynote speeches for the 1972 Republican National Convention. 3 pgs. 2 70 6/20/1972Campaign Memo From Chapin to Haldeman RE: Republican Convention. Handwritten notes added by unknown. Carbon copies to Dick Moore, Timmons, and Carruthers. 4 pgs. Friday, March 12, 2010 Page 1 of 2 Box Number Folder Number Document Date No Date Subject Document Type Document Description 270 Campaign Memo From Tex McCrary to Chapin and Moore RE: impact of the 1972 Republican National Convention. Handwritten notes added by unknown. 4 pgs. 2 70 7/20/1972Campaign Memo From Bill Safire to Haldeman RE: television audience of the Republican National Convention in 1972. Carbon copy for Dick Moore. Handwritten note added by unknown. 1 pg. Friday, March 12, 2010 Page 2 of 2 MEMORANDUM THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON August 2, 1972 MEMORANDUM FOR: DWIGHT CHAPIN" BILL HENKEL FROM: MARK GOOD~. !JJ . Regarding the offer of a Packard Bell Horne Video Tape Cartridge Machine for the President' s use in Miami, I feel it should be declined. Any manufacturer of such hardware would be more than glad to set up such a deal. However, it hardly seems worth risking even the slightest mention of such an arrangement, when that piece of equipment can be easily rented at a reasonable rate.
    [Show full text]
  • Character/Person Role/Job the PRESIDENT and ALL of HIS MEN
    Actor Character/Person Role/Job THE PRESIDENT AND ALL OF HIS MEN Richard Nixon 37th US President 39th VP under Nixon until 1973; resigned amid charges of extortion, tax fraud, bribery & Spiro Agnew conspiracy (replaced by Gerald Ford, who was the House Minority Leader) VP replacing Agnew, later became 38th US Gerald Ford President Special counsel to Nixon; set up the Charles Colson "plumbers" unit to investigate info leaks from White House Nixon's domestic policy adviser; directed the John Ehrlichman "plumbers" unit H.R. “Bob” Haldeman Nixon’s chief of staff Haldeman's right-hand man; was the deputy Jeb Stuart Magruder director of Nixon's re-election campaign when the break-in occurred at his urging Nixon’s 1972 midwest campaign manager; Kenneth Dahlberg his check for $25k to Maurice Stans wound up in bank acct of a Watergate burglar Attorney General; then quit AG to be John Randolph John Mitchell chairman of CREEP; linked to a slush fund that funded the burglary Replaced Mitchell as chairman of CREEP Clark MacGregor (July to Nov 1972) Became Attorney General in 1972 (5 days before Watergate break-in) when Mitchell Richard Kleindienst resigned as AG to go work for CREEP; resigned in 1973 Former CIA agent and mastermind of the break-in; Member of the White House E. Howard Hunt "plumbers"; his phone # was found on a WG burglar, linking break-in to WH Former FBI agent who helped plan the break- G. Gordon Liddy in at DNC offices; spent over 4 years in prison; now an actor, author & talk-show host Commerce secretary & later the finance chairman for CREEP; raised nearly $60 Maurice Stans million for Nixon's re-election; insisted that he had no knowledge how some of the money he raised wound up in the cover-up.
    [Show full text]
  • Memories of the Ellsberg Break-In Stephen Trott
    Hastings Law Journal Volume 51 | Issue 4 Article 14 1-2000 Memories of the Ellsberg Break-In Stephen Trott Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_law_journal Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Stephen Trott, Memories of the Ellsberg Break-In, 51 Hastings L.J. 765 (2000). Available at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_law_journal/vol51/iss4/14 This Panel is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hastings Law Journal by an authorized editor of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact wangangela@uchastings.edu. Memories of the Ellsberg Break-In transcribedremarks of THE HONORABLE STEPHEN TROTr* Introduction by Fred Altshuler, Esq.: As a deputy district attorney in Los Angeles County, Stephen Trott prosecuted presidential assistant John Ehrlichman and G. Gordon Liddy for the burglary of the office of Daniel Ellsberg's psychiatrist. I would now like to ask Judge Trott to give some of his views of the type of White House conduct that occurred during the Watergate era. Judge Troll: I had a fascinating window into this whole business. I was a deputy district attorney in Los Angeles County in charge of the organized crime division. I spent my time on cases involving CIA- trained Cuban bombers, militants shooting up UCLA, drugs, a rattlesnake being placed in the mailbox of a lawyer who was suing an operation called Synanon, and various pornography cases involving X-rated films like "Deep Throat" and "The Devil and Miss Jones." One odd day, my boss, Los Angeles County District Attorney Joe Busch, called me in and said: "Get your butt over to federal court, someone named Howard Hunt is about to blow the whistle on a burglary in Beverly Hills." Now, what was going on? In June of 1972, the Watergate break-in took the lid off this whole thing.
    [Show full text]
  • Nixon - Papers Access Authorizations (2)” of the Philip Buchen Files at the Gerald R
    The original documents are located in Box 28, folder “Nixon - Papers Access Authorizations (2)” of the Philip Buchen Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Copyright Notice The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Gerald R. Ford donated to the United States of America his copyrights in all of his unpublished writings in National Archives collections. Works prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public domain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to remain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid copyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Digitized from Box 28 of the Philip Buchen Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library J ' WASHif'JGTO:>J August 1, l97L1: JvlEMORANDUM FOR: H. STUART KNIGHT DIRECTOR OF SECRET SERVICE / FROM: GEOFFREY S:E-IEPARD~>. - SUBJECT: Access to Files This is to authorize Mr. George Williams to have access to the files of Mr. H. R. Haldern.c.n in Room 522 of the Executive Office "Building for the purpose of searching for documents subpoenaed by the Special Prosecutor. / .• THE \VH!TE HOUS2: WAShiNGTON August 6, 1974 MElvf.ORi\::\D 'J.Nl FOR: H. STUART Y>-L'41GHT DIRECTOR OF SECRET SERVICE FROM: GEOFFREYSHEPAF~~~ SUBJECT: Access to Files This is to authorize Mr. George Williams to have access to the files of Mr. John Dean in Room 84 and Room 522 of the Executive Oiiice Building for the purpose of searching for documents subpoenaed by the Special Prosecutor.
    [Show full text]