Newsletter of the Colorado Native Plant Society

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Newsletter of the Colorado Native Plant Society Newsletter of the Colorado Native Plant Society " ... dedicated to the appreciation and conservation of the Colorado native flora" Volume 25 Numl)er? November - December 20011 RARE PLANT SURVEY CONDUCTED AT CHEYENNE MOUNTAIN STATE PARK Robert Fe~wick, Ecologist Cheyenne Mountain state Park consists of 1680 acres of high botanist and Professor at Colorado College, was also consulted quality grassland, shrubland, and forest in the foothills tran~ition regarding the site's rare plant potential .. zone just south/of Colorado Springs. Elevations range from 6000- Once a list of possible species was generated, afull description of 8000 feet, and the park contains a wide variety of native plant each plant, it's flowering period, habitat preferences, and diag­ communities. The eastern side of the park consists of an extensive nostic information were compiled. This infommtion was gathered mixed-grass prairie that gradually transitions into oak-dominated using: Rare Plants o/Colorado, Colorado Flora: Eastern Slope, shrubland and foothill prairie. In the center of the park, the oak and Colorado Rare Plant Field Guide.· nixes with Ponderosa pine and mountain mahogany to form a Next, a field map of the site was generated using ArcView GIS to "-large area of woodlands. As elevation increases toward the west­ show the park boundary superimposed on a topographic map of ern boundary, Douglas-fir and white fir mix with Ponderosa pine and Rocky Mountain juniper to form mixed montane forest. Deep the area. A scale bar and colllpass bearing were also im~luded for ravines and canyons are dominated by dense stands of Douglas­ use in the field. Participants were encouraged to denote the areas that they surveyed, as well as the locations of any rare'plants and fir, with a few white fir and Ponderosa pine in admixture. noxious weeds that they encountered. Prior to its purchase by the state, the parcel waS privatelyheld and used as a cattle ranch and homestead. For the last 20-25 years, cat­ A data sheet for use in the field was also created. This sheet tIe were grazed on the property at a very low density (approxi­ prompted observers to include as much information as possible mately eight to ten head) and vegetation within the park remained regarding: certainty of identification, location, habitat features, in excellent condition (Chris Lieber, City of Colorado Springs, population size, evidence of reproduction, overall condition, and pers. comm.) , with few weed infestations. Given the minimal defensibility of the population. Each participant was given a field amount of disturbance to this/property, the high quality of resident map, potential species list with descriptions, and field data sheets. plant communities, and the relative absence of noxious weeds, the Volunteers were recruited with the assistance of the Colorado park was thought to have the capacity to support rare plant popu­ Native Plant Society (CoNPS}. Leo P. Bruederle (Editor) was an lations. Furthermore, a good diversity of plants had been record­ invaluable help in editing and printing an announcement in ed from the area and potential habitat for a number of rare species Aquilegia~ while Dan Fosha, President of the Society's new was thought to exist within the park. As such, a survey was con­ Southeast Chapter, announced the event artheir Chapter meeting ducted on 14 July 200 1. held just prior to the survey. METHODS "Rare Plant SurveyH continues on page two Rare species and records for the area were researched using data from the Colorado Natural Heritage Program (CNHP). Rare plant Contents rec9rds from a 10-square-mile· area around the park were exam­ About the Society . : . .7 ined, and those with elevations and habitat types similar to the Announcements ... ~ ...........3, 4,.5-6 )ark were considered likely possibilities. Species lists from The Articles ......... ' ............ 1-2, 3, 5-6 ~ature Conservancy's Aiken Canyon Preserve and nearby City of .Colorado Springs Open Space were also examined for rare Calendar ............. .8 species of potential occurrence within tIle park. 'fass Kelso, local Membership in the Society .............7 Page 2 Aquilegia Vol. 25 NO.7 URare Plant Survey" continued from page one species diversity will be a difficult, but. not impossible, task. A total of 11 people volunteered their efforts on the day of the sur­ Perhaps the greatest challenge will come from wildflower collec­ vey. Most were CoNPS members and highly skilled in plant iden­ tors who find themselves unable to resist the park's bounty. Park.. tification. Three teams of three and one team of two were created statT should be aware of this potential impact - placing signs inJ in orderto adequately cover the park in the time allotted and pro­ strategic locations may be warranted. Parks should also delineate vide for safety concerns. Survey areas specifically included sites specific low, or no-use, areas as a means to protect and preserve of probable park facilities development, poorly known portions of highly diverse locations. the park, and known locations of possible rare plant habitat. The Noxious weeds. Perhaps the greatest threat to survey began shortly after 9:00 AM and ended in the rain at native plant species in the park, rare or other­ approximately 3:00 PM. Due to heavy rains, data sheets, field wise, is the invasion of noxious weeds. TIle maps"and comments were submitted by mail. park currently has only a few species of nox'"" ious weeds, and most of tllese are not yet well RESULTS established. Control methods for species Two rare species of native plants were documented during the sur­ within the park should be implemen!ed as vey. Carrionflower, Smilax lasioneuron, had been observed at the soon as possible. Adjacent lands are also like­ site previously, but surveyors were able to document several pre­ ly to have populations of noxious weeds that viously unknown populations throughout the park. A small popu­ may spread into the park.. These populations Cirsium arvense lation of Scribner's needlegrass,Stipa scriblleri, was documented may require cooperative agreements with adjacent landowners. at thepark for the first time during the survey. Park visitors are also likely to introduce weeds into the park acc~­ A number of other, somewhat unusual and noteworthy, species dentally, and should be educated about the process of weed intro­ were also encountered during the survey. With thanks to George ductions and the damage that weeds cause tonative communities. Cameron for his input, these species are: Adjacent properties. In recent years, foothill areas have become Ipomoea leptophylla (bush morning-glory). Not known from highly prized for residential housing. Cheyenne Mountain pre­ similar, nearby Open Space lands or Aiken Canyon. serves one of tlle few large and unfragmented tracts of foothill Unexpected in the fooJhills. habitat remaining along the Front Range. Fortunately, the park is Penstemon brandegei (Brandegee's Penstemon). Not known bordered on several sides by contiguous natural lands that will from similar, nearby Open Space lands or Aiken Canyon. help maintain the quality of plant and animal communities within Penstemon barbatus (red Penstemon). Frequently encountered the park. However, development.is still possible, and even likely~' . in upper pm'tions of drainages. on private property at the northeast comer of the park (JL Ranch),....I Swida (=Cornus) sericea (red-osier dogwood). Upper Limekiln and on private parcels near the westenl boundary. Development of drainage .. these parcels will increase the possibility of both erosion and nox­ V itis riparia (wild grape)... Dominant in some portions of Limekiln. ious weed infestations that could have a direct impact on plant A1onardafistulosa (pink bergamot). Very abundant in large drifts. communities within the park. Onosmodium m~lle (false gromwell). Ablmdant along drainages. Fire suppression. Fire suppression is a major issue for the park. Ceanothus herbaceus (New Jersey tea). In the absence of fire, fire-intolerant D~uglas-fir and GambeI oak Asclep'ias tube rosa (orange milkweed). Fairly abundant in oak appear to be expanding iilto areas of tlle park where they aren't and ponderosa. necessarily expected. Fire is needed to maintain the integrity of Hypopitys monotropa and Pterospora andromedea (pine sap, many foothill communities, with many plants depending on fire pine drops). Interesting and unusual saprophytic plants. for reproduction and vigor. Forests and shrublands become over;-­ Cheilanthes feei, Cheilanthes fendleri, and- Draba streptocarpa. crowded in the absence of fire, and disease and insect predation Sandstone outcrop in Upper Limekiln. become more prevalent as forest health declines. A number of rare orchid species are known from the area, but none was encoun­ tered. Because they have specific light and substrate requirements, such species may be .among the first affected by conditions relat­ ed to fIre suppression . Surface water. Another important consideration, with regard to vegetation in the park is the relative lack of surface water. Limekiln Creek is dry most of the year, but h(is every indication of once hav- ing been a perennial stream. During the construction of NORAD in the 1950's, nearly all of the surface water flowing into the park off Smilax Cheyenne Mountain was "captured" for use at the NORAD facility MANAGE~1ENT II\1PLICATIONS (Chris Lieber, City of Colorado Springs,pers. comm,). Now 'Species diversity. Though somewhat lacking in terms of "rare" Limekiln and its tributaries hold water only during heavy rain c species, the park has a very good diversity of native plants, espe­ mnoff events. Certainly the NORAD diversions have had an impact--'" cially when compared to nearby sites. Survey volunteers made on veget?tion in the park, although the exact effects are unknown. reference to this in their notes. With increased use, maintaining Again, rare plants way have been among the first affected. Vol. 25 NO.7 Aquilegia Page 3 PRO BONO COUNSEL ANNOUNCED EXPLORING THE NATURAL WORLD The Society is proud to announce that the law firm of Schmehl, IN THE DIGITAL AGE '~owell & Mackler, PC.
Recommended publications
  • To See the Hike Archive
    Geographical Area Destination Trailhead Difficulty Distance El. Gain Dest'n Elev. Comments Allenspark 932 Trail Near Allenspark A 4 800 8580 Allenspark Miller Rock Riverside Dr/Hwy 7 TH A 6 700 8656 Allenspark Taylor and Big John Taylor Rd B 7 2300 9100 Peaks Allenspark House Rock Cabin Creek Rd A 6.6 1550 9613 Allenspark Meadow Mtn St Vrain Mtn TH C 7.4 3142 11632 Allenspark St Vrain Mtn St Vrain Mtn TH C 9.6 3672 12162 Big Thompson Canyon Sullivan Gulch Trail W of Waltonia Rd on Hwy A 2 941 8950 34 Big Thompson Canyon 34 Stone Mountain Round Mtn. TH B 8 2100 7900 Big Thompson Canyon 34 Mt Olympus Hwy 34 B 1.4 1438 8808 Big Thompson Canyon 34 Round (Sheep) Round Mtn. TH B 9 3106 8400 Mountain Big Thompson Canyon Hwy 34 Foothills Nature Trail Round Mtn TH EZ 2 413 6240 to CCC Shelter Bobcat Ridge Mahoney Park/Ginny Bobcat Ridge TH B 10 1500 7083 and DR trails Bobcat Ridge Bobcat Ridge High Bobcat Ridge TH B 9 2000 7000 Point Bobcat Ridge Ginny Trail to Valley Bobcat Ridge TH B 9 1604 7087 Loop Bobcat Ridge Ginny Trail via Bobcat Ridge TH B 9 1528 7090 Powerline Tr Boulder Chautauqua Park Royal Arch Chautauqua Trailhead by B 3.4 1358 7033 Rgr. Stn. Boulder County Open Space Mesa Trail NCAR Parking Area B 7 1600 6465 Boulder County Open Space Gregory Canyon Loop Gregory Canyon Rd TH B 3.4 1368 7327 Trail Boulder Open Space Heart Lake CR 149 to East Portal TH B 9 2000 9491 Boulder Open Space South Boulder Peak Boulder S.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyrighted Material
    20_574310 bindex.qxd 1/28/05 12:00 AM Page 460 Index Arapahoe Basin, 68, 292 Auto racing A AA (American Automo- Arapaho National Forest, Colorado Springs, 175 bile Association), 54 286 Denver, 122 Accommodations, 27, 38–40 Arapaho National Fort Morgan, 237 best, 9–10 Recreation Area, 286 Pueblo, 437 Active sports and recre- Arapaho-Roosevelt National Avery House, 217 ational activities, 60–71 Forest and Pawnee Adams State College–Luther Grasslands, 220, 221, 224 E. Bean Museum, 429 Arcade Amusements, Inc., B aby Doe Tabor Museum, Adventure Golf, 111 172 318 Aerial sports (glider flying Argo Gold Mine, Mill, and Bachelor Historic Tour, 432 and soaring). See also Museum, 138 Bachelor-Syracuse Mine Ballooning A. R. Mitchell Memorial Tour, 403 Boulder, 205 Museum of Western Art, Backcountry ski tours, Colorado Springs, 173 443 Vail, 307 Durango, 374 Art Castings of Colorado, Backcountry yurt system, Airfares, 26–27, 32–33, 53 230 State Forest State Park, Air Force Academy Falcons, Art Center of Estes Park, 222–223 175 246 Backpacking. See Hiking Airlines, 31, 36, 52–53 Art on the Corner, 346 and backpacking Airport security, 32 Aspen, 321–334 Balcony House, 389 Alamosa, 3, 426–430 accommodations, Ballooning, 62, 117–118, Alamosa–Monte Vista 329–333 173, 204 National Wildlife museums, art centers, and Banana Fun Park, 346 Refuges, 430 historic sites, 327–329 Bandimere Speedway, 122 Alpine Slide music festivals, 328 Barr Lake, 66 Durango Mountain Resort, nightlife, 334 Barr Lake State Park, 374 restaurants, 333–334 118, 121 Winter Park, 286
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Places to Go Camping
    Camping Additional Sources for Camping Information 100 pages Day hikes Fourteeners Weekend camping 40 pages Extended Activities Helpful Tools High Adventure Camps Colorado Council Camps Nebraska Cross Country Skiing Wyoming Camping Categories Paid Campsites Primitive Camping Camps Requiring Longer Camps with Cabins Distance Travel Paid Campsites Meeker Park Overflow Boulder Ranger District Roosevelt National Forest Open/Closed: Reduced-service camping is generally available mid-June until the first weekend after Labor Day, weather permitting. Reservations Accepted: All campsites are available on a first-come, first-served basis. No campsites are available for reservations. Sites: There are 29 sites; a maximum of 8 people are allowed per site. Elevation: 8,600 feet. Maximum Vehicle Length: 30 feet. Daily fee: Campsite fees are $6.00 per day, with an additional fee of $3.00 per day for a second vehicle. Location: The campground is on the west side of Highway 7 at mile-marker 11, approximately 13 miles south of Estes Park, or 10 miles north of the Highways 72 and 7 intersections, (approximately 21 miles west-northwest of Lyons). Amenities: Fire rings, vault toilets and trash services are provided. There are no picnic tables, grills, electrical hook-ups, dump stations, drinking water stations or showers. Trip Notes: Although not a full-service campground, Meeker Park Overflow tends to fill up early, due to its proximity to Estes Park and Rocky Mountain National Park. Longs Peak Trail Head is approximately 2 miles north of the campground, and the Wild Basin Ranger Station is approximately 3 miles south. Meeker Park Overflow is more suited for tent camping than trailers or RV's, due to the unpaved roads, steep hills, and short pull-ins.
    [Show full text]
  • Profiles of Colorado Roadless Areas
    PROFILES OF COLORADO ROADLESS AREAS Prepared by the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region July 23, 2008 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ARAPAHO-ROOSEVELT NATIONAL FOREST ......................................................................................................10 Bard Creek (23,000 acres) .......................................................................................................................................10 Byers Peak (10,200 acres)........................................................................................................................................12 Cache la Poudre Adjacent Area (3,200 acres)..........................................................................................................13 Cherokee Park (7,600 acres) ....................................................................................................................................14 Comanche Peak Adjacent Areas A - H (45,200 acres).............................................................................................15 Copper Mountain (13,500 acres) .............................................................................................................................19 Crosier Mountain (7,200 acres) ...............................................................................................................................20 Gold Run (6,600 acres) ............................................................................................................................................21
    [Show full text]
  • Wieder, W. R., and N. W. Bower. 2004. Fire History of the Aiken
    THE SOUTHWESTERN NATURALIST 49(2):239±298 JUNE 2004 NOTES FIRE HISTORY OF THE AIKEN CANYON GRASSLAND-WOODLAND ECOTONE IN THE SOUTHERN FOOTHILLS OF THE COLORADO FRONT RANGE WILLIAM R. WIEDER AND NATHAN W. BOWER* Environmental Science Program, Colorado College, 14 East Cache La Poudre, Colorado Springs, CO 80903 *Correspondent: [email protected] ABSTRACT A ®re history for the Aiken Canyon Nature Conservancy preserve in Colorado is presented. Eighteen cross-sections cut from ponderosa pine recorded 20 ®re events for the period spanning 1602 to 1999. An unusually small median ®re interval (MFI) of 7.5 years was obtained for the period 1753 to 1935. A signi®cant association was found between El Nino weather patterns and the ®res at Aiken Canyon. A shorter MFI was observed in the grasslands, which are at lower elevations. Fires from railroads or cattle ranching might have caused the shorter MFI in the grass- lands between 1872 and 1935. After 1935, ®re suppression became common. RESUMEN Se presenta la historia de fuegos en la reserva de la Aiken Canyon Nature Conser- vancy en Colorado. Dieciocho secciones cortadas de Pinus ponderosa registraron 20 acontecimien- tos de fuego en el perõÂodo de 1602 a 1999. Un medio excepcionalmente pequenÄo del intervalo de fuego (MIF) de 7.5 anÄos se obtuvo por el perõÂodo de 1753 a 1935. Se encontro una asociacioÂn signi®cativa entre patrones de tiempo de El NinÄo y fuegos en el Aiken Canyon. Un MIF maÂs corto se observo en los prados que estaÂn en elevaciones maÂs bajas. Fuegos de los ferrocarriles o de ranchos de ganado pudieron haber causado el MIF corto en los prados entre 1872 y 1935.
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado 1 (! 1 27 Y S.P
    # # # # # # # # # ######## # # ## # # # ## # # # # # 1 2 3 4 5 # 6 7 8 9 1011121314151617 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ) " 8 Muddy !a Ik ") 24 6 ") (!KÂ ) )¬ (! LARAMIE" KIMBALL GARDEN 1 ") I¸ 6 Medicine Bow !` Lodg Centennial 4 ep National Federal ole (! 9 Lake McConaughy CARBON Forest I§ Kimball 9 CHEYENNE 11 C 12 1 Potter CURT GOWDY reek Bushnell (! 11 ") 15 ") ") Riverside (! LARAMIE ! ") Ik ( ") (! ) " Colorado 1 8 (! 1 27 Y S.P. ") Pine !a 2 Ij Cree Medicine Bow 2 KÂ 6 .R. 3 12 2 7 9 ) Flaming Gorge R ") " National 34 .P. (! Burns Bluffs k U ") 10 5 National SWEETWATER Encampment (! 7 KEITH 40 Forest (! Red Buttes (! 4 Egbert ") 8 Sidney 10 Lodgepole Recreation Area 796 (! DEUEL ") ) " ") 2 ! 6 ") 3 ( Albany ") 9 2 A (! 6 9 ) River 27 6 Ik !a " 1 2 3 6 3 CHEYENNE ") Brule K ") on ") G 4 10 Big Springs Jct. 9 lli ") ) Ik " ") 3 Chappell 2 14 (! (! 17 4 ") Vermi S Woods Landing ") !a N (! Ik ) ! 8 15 8 " ") ) ( " !a # ALBANY 3 3 ^! 5 7 2 3 ") ( Big Springs ") ") (! 4 3 (! 11 6 2 ek ") 6 WYOMING MI Dixon Medicine Bow 4 Carpenter Barton ") (! (! 6 RA I« 10 ) Baggs Tie Siding " Cre Savery (! ! (! National ") ( 6 O 7 9 B (! 4 Forest 8 9 5 4 5 Flaming UTAH 2 5 15 9 A Dutch John Mountain ") Y I¸11 Gorge (! 4 NEBRASKA (! (! Powder K Res. ^ Home tonwo 2 ^ NE t o o ! C d ! ell h Little En (! WYOMING 3 W p ! 7 as S Tala Sh (! W Slater cam ^ ") Ovid 4 ! ! mant Snake River pm ^ ^ 3 ! es Cr (! ! ! ^ Li ! Gr Mi en ^ ^ ^ ttle eek 8 ! ^JULESBURG een Creek k Powder Wash ddle t ! Hereford (! ! 8 e NORTHGATE 4 ( Peetz ! ! Willo ork K R Virginia Jumbo Lake Sedgwick ! ! # T( ") Cre F ing (! 1 ek Y 7 RA ^ Cre CANYON ek Lara (! Dale B I§ w Big Creek o k F e 2 9 8 Cre 9 Cr x DAGGETT o Fo m Lakes e 7 C T(R B r NATURE TRAIL ") A ee u So k i e e lde d 7 r lomon e k a I« 1 0 Cr mil h k k r 17 t r r 293 PERKINS River Creek u e 9 River Pawnee v 1 e o e ") Carr ree r Rockport Stuc Poud 49 7 r® Dry S Ri C National 22 SENTINAL La HAMILTON RESERVOIR/ (! (! k 6 NE e A Gr e Halligan Res.
    [Show full text]
  • Pikes Peak Massif
    Wild Connections Conservation Plan for the Pike & San Isabel National Forests Chapter 5 – Complexes: Area-Specific Management Recommendations This section contains our detailed, area-specific proposal utilizing the theme based approach to land management. As an organizational tool, this proposal divides the Pike-San Isabel National Forest into eleven separate Complexes, based on geo-physical characteristics of the land such as mountain ranges, parklands, or canyon systems. Each complex narrative provides details and justifications for our management recommendations for specific areas. In order to emphasize the larger landscape and connectivity of these lands with the ecoregion, commentary on relationships to adjacent non-Forest lands are also included. Evaluations of ecological value across public and private lands are used throughout this chapter. The Colorado Natural Heritage Programs rates the biodiversity of Potential Conservation Areas (PCAs) as General Biodiversity, Moderate, High, Very High, and Outranking Significance. The Nature Conservancy assesses the conservation value of its Conservation Blueprint areas as Low, Moderately Low, Moderate, Moderately High and High. The Southern Rockies Ecosystem Project's Wildlands Network Vision recommends land use designations of Core Wilderness, Core Agency, Low and Moderate Compatible Use, and Wildlife Linkages. Detailed explanations are available from the respective organizations. Complexes – Summary List by Watershed Table 5.1: Summary of WCCP Complexes Watershed Complex Ranger District
    [Show full text]
  • Rocky Mountain National Park Geologic Resource Evaluation Report
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Geologic Resources Division Denver, Colorado Rocky Mountain National Park Geologic Resource Evaluation Report Rocky Mountain National Park Geologic Resource Evaluation Geologic Resources Division Denver, Colorado U.S. Department of the Interior Washington, DC Table of Contents Executive Summary ...................................................................................................... 1 Dedication and Acknowledgements............................................................................ 2 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 3 Purpose of the Geologic Resource Evaluation Program ............................................................................................3 Geologic Setting .........................................................................................................................................................3 Geologic Issues............................................................................................................. 5 Alpine Environments...................................................................................................................................................5 Flooding......................................................................................................................................................................5 Hydrogeology .............................................................................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • Building Communities That Are Fostered in Respect and Trust
    FALL ISSUE... 2018 The Cheley PACK RAT CHELEY COLORADO CAMPS 1-800-CAMPFUN WWW.CHELEY.COM Building Communities That Are EMAIL: [email protected] Fostered in Respect and Trust BACORATAC – Building a community of respect and trust at Cheley. Imagine if we all focused on building communities that were fostered in respect and trust. Imagine if our young people were presented daily with examples of respectful behavior. Respecting other people’s views, beliefs, backgrounds, and aspirations. Rather than the responses of negativity and disdain for opposing views, we could all improve in our IN THIS ISSUE... responses to differing Building Communities That Are views and demonstrate Fostered in Respect and Trust ........... 1 respect. This would make Camp Dates for 2019 Season ............ 2 a huge impact on our communities. Hopefully Family Camp 2018 ............................. 2 this summer, each of our Cheley/Childrens’ Burn Camp 2018 .. 2 campers and staff were Teen Summit Camp 2018 .................. 3 introduced to different Cheley Mini Camp 2018 .................... 3 cultures, values, and Lower Chipeta 2018 ........................... 4 opinions. By spending time building relationships with people from different cultures, each of Lower Ski Hi 2018 .............................. 5 us have broadened our understanding of the world. Chipeta 2018...................................... 7 This summer Shawn Ness, our Director of Operations, consistently Ski Hi 2018 ......................................... 8 reminded us to consider positive presuppositions when talking or Senior Chipeta 2018 .........................10 working with others. The idea is that we start each conversation or Haiyaha 2018 ................................... 12 thought by giving everyone the benefit of the doubt. For example, Girls’ Trail’s End 2018 ........................14 when someone shows up late, often we think “they are lazy, they don’t Boys’ Trail’s End 2018 .....................
    [Show full text]
  • Rocky Mountain National Park Geologic Resources Evaluation
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center Rocky Mountain National Park Geologic Resource Evaluation Report Natural Resource Report NPS/NRPC/GRD/NRR—2004/004 THIS PAGE: Ypsilon Mountain, Rocky Mountain NP. ON THE COVER: Alpine Tundra looking west to the Never Summer Range, Rocky Mountain NP Photos by: NPS and Josh Heise Rocky Mountain National Park Geologic Resource Evaluation Report Natural Resource Report NPS/NRPC/GRD/NRR—2004/004 Geologic Resources Division Natural Resource Program Center P.O. Box 25287 Denver, Colorado 80225 September 2004 U.S. Department of the Interior Washington, D.C. The Natural Resource Publication series addresses natural resource topics that are of interest and applicability to a broad readership in the National Park Service and to others in the management of natural resources, including the scientific community, the public, and the NPS conservation and environmental constituencies. Manuscripts are peer-reviewed to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and is designed and published in a professional manner. Natural Resource Reports are the designated medium for disseminating high priority, current natural resource management information with managerial application. The series targets a general, diverse audience, and may contain NPS policy considerations or address sensitive issues of management applicability. Examples of the diverse array of reports published in this series include vital signs monitoring plans; "how to" resource management papers; proceedings of resource management workshops or conferences; annual reports of resource programs or divisions of the Natural Resource Program Center; resource action plans; fact sheets; and regularly-published newsletters.
    [Show full text]
  • Acting Spontaneously in the Right
    FALL ISSUE... 2017 The Cheley PACK RAT CHELEY COLORADO CAMPS 1-800-CAMPFUN Acting Spontaneously in the Right WWW.CHELEY.COM The spirit button for 2017 was LTASITRAC – Learning to act EMAIL: [email protected] spontaneously in the right at Cheley. Frank Cheley said in 1921, “Cheley aims to help boys and girls cultivate the ability to act spontaneously in the right, and by doing this to contribute definitely to the creation of a better world.” The world needs people of integrity that can navigate the difficult challenges of today. Cheley strives to inculcate in children a commitment to integrity and making the world a better place. I love the definition for integrity that says “doing the right thing even when no one is watching.” Watching the recovery efforts throughout this hurricane season IN THIS ISSUE... with the floods, and the fires in the ... 1 West, it has been encouraging to see Acting Spontaneously In the Right ............ 2 neighbor helping neighbor. People Camp Dates for 2018 Season 2 have lost their lives, their families, and Family Camp 2017 ............................. their possessions. I can’t imagine the .. 2 Cheley/Childrens’ Burn Camp 2017 emotions in experiencing a loss like .................. 3 Teen Summit Camp 2017 this. Yes, we experienced the flood of .................... 3 2013, but we didn’t lose everything Cheley Mini Camp 2017 4 we had. Hearing the stories of people Lower Chipeta 2017 ........................... 5 helping others has been a positive Lower Ski Hi 2017 .............................. 7 in the sometimes challenging news Chipeta 2017...................................... cycle. People acting spontaneously in the right has been seen over and 8 Ski Hi 2017 ........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Community Wildfire Protection Plan for Unincorporated El Paso County
    Community Wildfire Protection Plan i for Unincorporated El Paso County Community Wildfire Protection Plan for Unincorporated El Paso County “A Continuing Process” El Paso County Sheriff’s Office Emergency Services Division 101 West Costilla Street, Colorado Springs, CO 80903 ii Community Wildfire Protection Plan for Unincorporated El Paso County Contents Acknowledgements........................................................................................................ i Supporting agencies...................................................................................................... ii Fire Departments............................................................................................................................................ ii Forestry and Natural Resources..................................................................................................................... iii Emergency Management............................................................................................................................... iii Land Use and Planning.................................................................................................................................. iii Utilities.......................................................................................................................................................... iii Local Community Wildfire Protection Plans in Unincorporated El Paso County.......................................................................... iv Introduction ................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]