The Conservation Ecology of the Irish Hare (Lepus Timidus Hibernicus)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Conservation Ecology of the Irish Hare (Lepus Timidus Hibernicus) The conservation ecology of the Irish hare (Lepus timidus hibernicus) Reid, N. (2006). The conservation ecology of the Irish hare (Lepus timidus hibernicus). Queen's University Belfast. Queen's University Belfast - Research Portal: Link to publication record in Queen's University Belfast Research Portal General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Queen's University Belfast Research Portal is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The Research Portal is Queen's institutional repository that provides access to Queen's research output. Every effort has been made to ensure that content in the Research Portal does not infringe any person's rights, or applicable UK laws. If you discover content in the Research Portal that you believe breaches copyright or violates any law, please contact [email protected]. Download date:30. Sep. 2021 CONSERVATION ECOLOGY OF THE IRISH HARE ( Lepus timidus hibernicus ) A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Biological Sciences Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences Queen’s University Belfast Neil Reid BSc (Hons) Zoology September 2006 ii DECLARATION This document is a modified copy of a thesis submitted to the Queen’s University of Belfast and is not an exact reproduction. Some chapters have been replaced with manuscripts accepted for publication in peer-reviewed journals to ensure that the information presented here is consistent with that released into the public domain. I declare that the work contained within this document was carried out in accordance with the regulations of the Queen’s University Belfast and complies with the criteria required by the Academic Council as follows: (i) the thesis is not one for which a degree has been or will be conferred by any other university or institution. (ii) the thesis is not one for which a degree has already been conferred by Queen’s. (iii) the work for the thesis is my own and that, where material submitted for another degree or work undertaken by another party as part of a research group has been incorporated into the thesis, the extent of that work thus incorporated has been clearly indicated. (iv) the composition of the thesis is the candidate’s own work (v) any views expressed in the thesis are those of the author and in no way represent those of the Queen’s University Belfast. Neil Reid Date 15/09/2006 iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am very grateful to my supervisor Prof. W. Ian Montgomery for his guidance, advice and continual encouragement. I am also indebted to Dr. Robbie McDonald for his statistical advice and support throughout the project and to Prof. Robert Elwood and Dr. Stuart Bearhop for comments on manuscripts. The project was funded by the Environment and Heritage Service (DOE, NI), under project code CON 2/1(150). Fieldwork was possible only with help and I am thankful to all those who enthusiastically participated. Particular thanks go to my father, Noel Reid and colleagues, Mathieu Lundy, Andrew Harrison, Clare Aughey, Paul Lynas, Iain Adderton, Marc Ruddock, Alan Harrison and Gillian Robb. Thanks also to Rory Finlay. I am also grateful to David Tosh and Karina Dingerkus for help with transcribing and collating gamebag records. Thanks also to the Irish Coursing Club (ICC), in particular Jerry Desmond, and the National Parks and Wildlife Service (DOEHLG, Republic of Ireland) for providing official ICC records. I am also indebted to Patrick Daly and the members of the Dungannon Coursing Club for advice, help and encouragement during netting operations. Thanks to Alan Parks and Eric Parkes and the farmers of Drumahean, South Armagh for allowing free access to their land. Finally, I would like to pay particular thanks to Mathieu Lundy, Andrew Harrison and Alan Harrison for their advice and most importantly friendship throughout. iv CONTENTS Title page ……………………………………………………………..……. i Declaration ………………………………………………………..……….. iii Acknowledgements ……………………………………………………..…. iv Contents ……………………………………………………………….…... v Summary ………….…………………………………………………. 1 Chapter 1 Introduction ………………………………………………. 2 Chapter 2 The historical status and population dynamics of the Irish hare .………………………………. 20 Chapter 3 Factors associated with hare mortality during coursing ……………….…………………………… 38 Chapter 4 Naturalisation of brown hares in Ireland: A threat to the Irish hare? ………………………………… 53 Chapter 5 Habitat heterogeneity and home ranging behaviour of the Irish hare ………………………………… 71 Chapter 6 Mammals and agri-environment schemes: Hare haven or pest paradise? …………………………….. 92 Chapter 7 General discussion, conclusions & recommendations ……………………………………… 108 References …………………………………………………………….. 116 Appendices …………………………………………………………….. 135 Population estimation of Irish hares in Northern Ireland ……………………………………….. 137 v SUMMARY Irish hare (Lepus timidus hibernicus ) population declines may have been initiated by changes in land management practices and agricultural intensification during the early 20 th century. Irish hare population dynamics demonstrate substantial interannual and multiannual population fluctuation with a decadal anti-cycle periodicity. Annual population growth may be influenced by both intrinsic delayed density dependence and extrinsic climatic factors. Analysis of hare coursing activity during the last 20 years indicates that measures taken by the Irish Coursing Club to mitigate the impact of its activity on hare welfare has reduced hare mortality significantly. Current mortality rates are negligible and it is unlikely that hare coursing has a negative effect on Irish hare populations. Introduced Brown hares (Lepus europaeus ) have successfully naturalised in Northern Ireland with populations present in Mid-Ulster and West Tyrone. Brown and Irish hares may have a strong interspecific competitive relationship as their ecological niches are similar and overlap considerably. Where brown hare populations have established they have usurped a proportion of the native Irish hare population. Brown hares may pose a potential threat to Irish hare populations in the future. Seasonal radiotracking indicates that habitat heterogeneity is important to Irish hares. Hares used improved grasslands during crepuscular and nocturnal periods and Juncus-dominated pasture during diurnal periods, suggesting that hares require habitats that provide both high quality forage and shelter and cover. Current conservation strategies, such as the Northern Ireland and all-Ireland Irish hare Species Action Plans (SAPs) rely on the success of agri-environment schemes to enhance suitable hare habitat to achieve their goal of increasing hare populations by 2010. Current research indicates that agri-environment scheme measures have had no effect on hare incidence or abundance, suggesting that without the introduction of a specific Irish hare measure they are unlikely to provide suitable mechanisms to achieve conservation objectives. 1 CHAPTER 1 Introduction 2 Chapter 1 Introduction Introduction 1.1 Conservation ecology Conservation is a relatively new concept developed during the late 20 th century (Soulé, 1985), based on concerns that the biosphere is being profoundly and adversely affected by its >6 billion human inhabitants (Vitousek, 1997). Increasing public awareness concerning environmental issues surrounding ecological degradation such as biodiversity loss, species declines and extinctions associated with habitat destruction, overexploitation, pollution, and global warming have resulted in increased political sensitivity to environmental concerns. Conservation as defined by the Oxford English Dictionary is “the preservation or restoration of the natural environment and wildlife”, whilst ecology is “the branch of biology concerned with the relations of organisms to one another and to their physical environment”. The study of ecological interactions is central in informing conservation strategies leading to the emergence of a new discipline: conservation ecology . The preservation of ‘naturalness’ by the retention of biotic diversity has been the cornerstone of traditional conservation, but the difficulty in defining ‘natural’ with respect to human activities has resulted in the emergence of two complementary conservation philosophies (Callicott et al. , 1999; Angermeier, 2000). Compostionalism encompasses ecological concepts such as biological diversity, biological integrity and ecological restoration, whilst functionalism includes human interests such as sustainable development, ecological sustainability and ecosystem health (Callicott et al , 1999). Conservation strategies have been dominated by compositionalist approaches often involving the preservation of charismatic species (via charities such as the World Wildlife Fund) and pristine wilderness (via organisations such as the Wilderness Society). However, contemporary strategies have moved towards holistic functionalist approaches. It is now recognised widely that the synthesis of both philosophical concepts is essential as neither can effectively proceed in isolation (Meine, 1992; Vandermeer & Perfecto, 1997; Callicott et al , 1999). Nonetheless, many conservation strategies still centre on iconic flagship species or taxa of public and political concern e.g. Species Action Plans. The subject of this thesis is one such species: the Irish hare ( Lepus timidus hibernicus Bell, 1837). 3 Chapter 1
Recommended publications
  • Durham E-Theses
    Durham E-Theses The foraging behaviour and population dynamics of the northern gannet Lewis, Sue How to cite: Lewis, Sue (2002) The foraging behaviour and population dynamics of the northern gannet, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/4125/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. No quotation from it should be published without his prior written consent and information derived from it should be acknowledged. The foraging behaviour and population dynamics of the northern gannet Sue Lewis Submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of the University of Durham, December 2002. I 1 MAY 2003 I The foraging behaviour and population dynamics of the northern gannet ^^^^ V s To Mum and Dad for always believing in me Candidates declaration I declare that the work contained in this thesis is entirely my own, unless otherwise stated, and it is of my own composition.
    [Show full text]
  • Durham E-Theses
    Durham E-Theses Foraging and food provisioning strategies of Northern Fulmars and Manx Shearwaters Gray, Catherine Mairi How to cite: Gray, Catherine Mairi (2001) Foraging and food provisioning strategies of Northern Fulmars and Manx Shearwaters, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/3821/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 Foraging and Food Provisioning Strategies of Northern Fulmars and Manx Shearwaters The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. No quotation from it should be published in any form, including Electronic and the Internet, without the author's prior written consent. All information derived from this thesis must be acknowledged appropriately. Catherine Mairi Gray Presented in candidature for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Durham Department of Biological Sciences 2001 Candidate's Declaration I declare that the material contained in this thesis has not been previously submitted for a degree in this or any other university.
    [Show full text]
  • 1St International Eurasian Ornithology Congress
    1st International Eurasian Ornithology Congress Erdoğan, A., Turan, L., Albayrak, T. (Ed.) 1ST INTERNATIONAL EURASIAN ORNITHOLOGY CONGRESS Antalya, Turkey 8-11 April 2004 Jointly organized by Akdeniz University - Antalya and Hacettepe University - Ankara i 1st International Eurasian Ornithology Congress Ali Erdoğan, Levent Turan, Tamer Albayrak (Editorial Board) 1ST INTERNATIONAL EURASIAN ORNITHOLOGY CONGRESS Antalya Turkey 8-11 April 2004 ISBN: 975-98424-0-8 Print: Sadri Grafik 2004 Antalya ii 1st International Eurasian Ornithology Congress HONORARY PRESIDENTS (ALPHABETICALLY ORDERED) Prof. Dr. Tunçalp ÖZGEN Rector of Hacettepe University, Ankara Prof.Dr.Yaşar UÇAR Rector of Akdeniz University, Antalya CONGRESS CHAIRMAN Prof.Dr. İlhami KİZİROĞLU Hacettepe University EXECUTİVE COMMİTTEE Prof. Dr. Ali ERDOĞAN (Chairman) Prof. Dr. İlhami KİZİROĞLU Assoc. Prof. Dr. Levent TURAN (Vice Chairman) Cengiz GÖKOĞLU (Mayor of Bogazkent ) SCIENTIFIC CONGRESS SECRETARY Tamer ALBAYRAK (Akdeniz University, Antalya) iii 1st International Eurasian Ornithology Congress SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE Özdemir ADIZEL, (Yüzüncüyıl U. Van, Turkey ) Zafer AYAŞ, (Hacettepe U. Ankara, Turkey) Yusuf AYVAZ, (S. Demirel U. Isparta,Turkey) Walter BÄUMLER, (TU, Münich, Germany ) Franz BAIRLEIN, (Journal f.Ornithologie, Germany) Stuart BEARHOP, (University of Glasgow, UK) Einhard BEZZEL, (Falke, Germany) Mahmut BILGINER, (Ondokuz Mayıs U. Samsun, Turkey) Dan CHAMBERLAIN, (University of Stirling, UK) Ali ERDOĞAN, (Akdeniz U. Antalya, Turkey) Michael EXO, (Institut fuer Vogelforschung,
    [Show full text]
  • User Behaviour, Best Practice and the Risks of Non-Target Exposure Associated with Anticoagulant Rodenticide Use Journal of Envi
    Journal of Environmental Management 92 (2011) 1503e1508 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Environmental Management journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jenvman User behaviour, best practice and the risks of non-target exposure associated with anticoagulant rodenticide use David G. Tosh a,b,*, Richard F. Shore b, Stephen Jess c, Alan Withers c, Stuart Bearhop d, W. Ian Montgomery a, Robbie A. McDonald e a School of Biological Sciences, Queen’s University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast BT9 7BL, Northern Ireland, UK b NERC Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Lancaster Environment Centre, Library Avenue, Bailrigg, Lancaster LA1 4AP, UK c Pesticide Usage Survey Group, Agri-food and Biosciences Institute, Newforge Lane, Belfast, BT9 5PX, Northern Ireland, UK d Centre for Ecology and Conservation, The University of Exeter, Cornwall Campus, Penryn, Cornwall TR10 9EZ, UK e The Food and Environment Research Agency, Sand Hutton, York YO41 1LZ, UK article info abstract Article history: Usage of anticoagulant rodenticides (ARs) is an integral component of modern agriculture and is Received 10 June 2010 essential for the control of commensal rodent populations. However, the extensive deployment of ARs Received in revised form has led to widespread exposure of a range of non-target predatory birds and mammals to some 18 November 2010 compounds, in particular the second-generation anticoagulant rodenticides (SGARs). As a result, there Accepted 12 December 2010 has been considerable effort placed into devising voluntary best practice guidelines that increase the Available online 26 January 2011 efficacy of rodent control and reduce the risk of non-target exposure. Currently, there is limited pub- lished information on actual practice amongst users or implementation of best practice.
    [Show full text]
  • HS NEWS Volume 22, Issue 01
    WellBeing International WBI Studies Repository Spring 1977 HS NEWS Volume 22, Issue 01 Follow this and additional works at: https://www.wellbeingintlstudiesrepository.org/v22_news Recommended Citation "HS NEWS Volume 22, Issue 01" (1977). HSUS News 1977. 4. https://www.wellbeingintlstudiesrepository.org/v22_news/4 This material is brought to you for free and open access by WellBeing International. It has been accepted for inclusion by an authorized administrator of the WBI Studies Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MASTERFILE COPY HutnaneThe Do Not Remove SPRING 1977 Vol. 22 No.1 soc•e"'. OF THE UNITED STAT:~ Let's Put Greyhound Racing Out of the Running! Let's Put Greyhound Racing The popularity of greyhound racing is increasing. According to a prevent it from becoming legal in other states. is that it is necessary for their dogs to be trained recent HSUS survey of the 50 state attorneys general, greyhound racing Recently, The HSUS and others did just that in in that way in order to be competitive with dogs has been legalized in 72% of the states which had it proposed in their the state of California where the voters were trained in other states where use of live rabbits legislatures during the past two years. Likewise, pari-mutuel or other asked to permit wagering at dog tracks. The is not illegal. The trainers suggest they would be wagering has been allowed at the dog tracks in each state adopting HSUS immediately issued and circulated a cheating the betting public if they didn't train greyhound racing.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Action Plan for Animal Welfare Contents
    Our Action Plan for Animal Welfare Contents Foreword by the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs 3 Executive summary 5 Devolution and engagement 7 Sentience and enforcement 8 International trade and advocacy 9 Farm animals 12 Pets and sporting animals 14 Wild animals 17 Next steps 19 2 Our Action Plan for Animal Welfare Foreword by the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs We are a nation of animal lovers. The UK was the first country in the world to pass legislation to protect animals in 1822 with the Cruel Treatment of Cattle Act. We built on this to improve conditions related to slaughterhouses in 1875, and then passed the landmark Protection of Animals Act in 1911. The Animal Welfare Act 2006 introduced a robust framework and powers for protecting all kept animals in England and Wales. Since 2010 we have achieved remarkable things in animal welfare. On farms we introduced new regulations for minimum standards for meat chickens, banned the use of conventional battery cages for laying hens and made CCTV mandatory in slaughterhouses in England. For pets, microchipping became mandatory for dogs in 2015, we modernised our licensing system for a range of activities such as dog breeding and pet sales, have protected service animals via ‘Finn’s Law’ and banned the commercial third-party sales of puppies and kittens (‘Lucy’s Law’). In 2019 our Wild Animals in Circuses Act became law, and we have led work to implement humane trapping standards. But we are going to go further. Our manifesto was clear that high standards of animal welfare are one of the hallmarks of a civilised society.
    [Show full text]
  • 1-FWG-Presentation
    Forensics Working Group FWG Terms of Reference • Published on Defra PAW website • Objective: to assist in combating wildlife crime through the promotion, development and measured review of DNA and forensic techniques • FWG supports the whole of PAW UK, providing tools to assist enforcers FWG Composition • Representatives of UK government departments, police, UK Border Agency, government endorsed forensic laboratories and secure NGOs • 2-3 meetings a year, informs and informed by PAW Steering Group Improved Information available • Collated cases that have used forensics • Awareness of tests available • Legal Eagle articles • Forensic Wildlife Crime Handbook (Oct 2012) • PAW / NWCU / TRACE websites Sampling Kits • Practical kit for use in the field • Maximising evidential opportunities • Easy -to -use • Consumable replacements • Advice and guidance, contacts Forensic Analysis Fund • Match-funding for wildlife forensic analysis • Information provided by investigator, assessed by FAF panel • Conditions of funding (media / costs) • New improved form (2012) • Communication and awareness • Monitoring of effectiveness FAF - Selected case studies 1. Illegal trade in ivory 2. Rhino horn smuggling 3. Hare coursing 1. Illegal ivory trade • Trade in ivory is only legal if it is from an elephant that died before 1947 and it is worked • Online trade opened a new opportunity for potential illegal trade in ivory • Age of ivory from appearance can be faked 1. Illegal ivory trade • NWCU had intelligence relating to potential illegal ivory sales on eBay • Alerted Hampshire Police who carried out a search on the premises • 33 items of ivory seized • Accused claimed they were pre 1947 • FWG suggested carbon dating 1. Illegal ivory trade • Radio-carbon dating – new forensic tool to date ivory • Nuclear bomb testing enrichment of C 14 since 1950s • Can identify ivory that is from elephants alive after the ban in trade (1947) 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Management and Control of Populations of Foxes, Deer, Hares, and Mink in England and Wales, and the Impact of Hunting with Dogs
    A Report to the Committee of Inquiry into Hunting with Dogs Management and Control of Populations of Foxes, Deer, Hares, and Mink in England and Wales, and the Impact of Hunting with Dogs Macdonald, D.W.1, Tattersall, F.H.1, Johnson, P.J.1, Carbone, C.1, Reynolds, J. C.2, Langbein, J.3, Rushton, S. P.4 and Shirley, M.D.F.4 1Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, Dept. of Zoology, South Parks Rd., Oxford, OX1 3PS; 2The Game Conservancy Trust, Fordingbridge, Hampshire, SP6 1EF; 3Wildlife Research Consultant, “Greenleas”, Chapel Cleeve, Minehead, Somerset TA24 6HY; 4Centre for Land Use and Water Resources Research, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Porter Building, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU Management and Control of the Population of Foxes, Deer, Hares and Mink, Macdonald et al: and the Impact of Hunting with Dogs Executive Summary 1. Why seek to control populations of foxes, deer, hares, and mink in England and Wales? · A number of interest groups seek to control populations of foxes, deer, hares and mink for various, and often for several, reasons, summarised in Chapter 2. These reasons should be considered in the context of: ¨ An often ambivalent attitude to the species and its control. ¨ The general lack of a simple relationship between damage and abundance. ¨ Differences between perceived and actual damage sustained. · Foxes are widely controlled because they are perceived to kill livestock (lambs, poultry and piglets), game (including hares) and other ground-nesting birds. ¨ Fox predation on livestock is usually low level, but widespread and sometimes locally significant. Evidence is strong that fox predation has a significant impact on wild game populations, but less so for other ground-nesting birds.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of Blue Tits Cyanistes Caeruleus
    A CURATE’S EGG: FEEDING BIRDS DURING REPRODUCTION IS ‘GOOD IN PARTS’. A STUDY OF BLUE TITS CYANISTES CAERULEUS AND GREAT TITS PARUS MAJOR by TIMOTHY JAMES EDWARD HARRISON A thesis submitted to The University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Centre for Ornithology School of Biosciences The University of Birmingham February 2010 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT Food supplementation of birds in gardens is widespread and UK householders have recently been advised to supplement birds throughout the spring and summer. This coincides with reproduction of many avian species and supplementation with specific foods (e.g. live invertebrates) is encouraged to support breeding attempts in gardens. To investigate this further I mimicked food supplementation in gardens by providing two commercial bird foods (peanut cake and mealworms Tenebrio molitor) to blue tits Cyanistes caeruleus and great tits Parus major breeding in woodland in central England from 2006 to 2008. Supplementation advanced laying and reduced the number of young fledged significantly in both species, but provisioning with mealworms during the nestling phase increased apparent survival of fledglings.
    [Show full text]
  • FOI 004227-18 I Write in Connection with Your Request for Information
    Freedom of Information Request Reference N o: FOI 004227-18 I write in connection with your request for information received by Suffolk Constabulary on the 16 November 2018 in which you sought access to the following information: “By year, or the last ten years [or five?], and up to 15:11.18, please provide the number of "hare coursing" incidents for Suffolk Constabulary. This should be hare coursing offences contrary to part 1 section 5 of the Hunting Act 2004. If your force does not record in this manner, please provide information gathered from a free text search of your crime recording system. For each, please provide the full-text description of the incident.” Response to your Request The response provided below is correct as of 19 November 2018 Suffolk Constabulary has considered your request for information and the response is below. Suffolk Constabulary only holds information from 19 October 2015 as a result in a change in crime recording system and information relating to non-notifiable offences no longer being available for bulk data extraction from legacy data. The Constabulary has searched for all non-notifiable offences recorded under the Home Office classification of ‘Hunting Act 2004, Part 1, Section 5’, for the time frame 19 October 2015 – 15 November 2018. The total number of offences is provided as follows: HO Classification 2015 2016 2017 2018 Hunting Act 2004 - Attending a hare coursing event 1 2 Hunting Act 2004 - Controlling or handling a dog at a hare coursing event 2 1 1 Hunting Act 2004 - Entering a dog for a hare coursing event 1 Hunting Act 2004 - Hunting a wild mammal with a dog 1 Hunting Act 2004 - Knowingly facilitating a hare coursing event 1 Hunting Act 2004 - Participating in a hare coursing event 1 6 19 8 Hunting Act 2004 SS.5(1)(a) & 6 1 1 1 1 Hunting Act 2004 SS.5(2)(c) & 6 1 Grand Total 4 8 25 12 A brief summary extracted from the MO text of each offence is provided below.
    [Show full text]
  • Hunting Act 2004
    Hunting Act 2004 CHAPTER 37 CONTENTS PART 1 OFFENCES 1 Hunting wild mammals with dogs 2 Exempt hunting 3Hunting: assistance 4 Hunting: defence 5Hare coursing PART 2 ENFORCEMENT 6Penalty 7 Arrest 8Search and seizure 9Forfeiture 10 Offence by body corporate PART 3 GENERAL 11 Interpretation 12 Crown application 13 Amendments and repeals 14 Subordinate legislation 15 Commencement 16 Short title 17 Extent iv Hunting Act 2004 (c. 37) Schedule 1 — Exempt Hunting Schedule 2 — Consequential Amendments Schedule 3 — Repeals ELIZABETH II c. 37 Hunting Act 2004 2004 CHAPTER 37 An Act to make provision about hunting wild mammals with dogs; to prohibit hare coursing; and for connected purposes. [18th November 2004] E IT ENACTED by The Queen’s most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Commons in this present Parliament assembled, in Baccordance with the provisions of the Parliament Acts 1911 and 1949, and by the authority of the same, as follows:— PART 1 OFFENCES 1 Hunting wild mammals with dogs A person commits an offence if he hunts a wild mammal with a dog, unless his hunting is exempt. 2 Exempt hunting (1) Hunting is exempt if it is within a class specified in Schedule 1. (2) The Secretary of State may by order amend Schedule 1 so as to vary a class of exempt hunting. 3 Hunting: assistance (1) A person commits an offence if he knowingly permits land which belongs to him to be entered or used in the course of the commission of an offence under section 1. (2) A person commits an offence if he knowingly permits a dog which belongs to him to be used in the course of the commission of an offence under section 1.
    [Show full text]
  • This Article Appeared in a Journal Published by Elsevier. the Attached
    This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and education use, including for instruction at the authors institution and sharing with colleagues. Other uses, including reproduction and distribution, or selling or licensing copies, or posting to personal, institutional or third party websites are prohibited. In most cases authors are permitted to post their version of the article (e.g. in Word or Tex form) to their personal website or institutional repository. Authors requiring further information regarding Elsevier’s archiving and manuscript policies are encouraged to visit: http://www.elsevier.com/copyright Author's personal copy Biological Conservation 156 (2012) 43–52 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Biological Conservation journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/biocon A novel projection technique to identify important at-sea areas for seabird conservation: An example using Northern gannets breeding in the North East Atlantic ⇑ W. James Grecian a, , Matthew J. Witt b, Martin J. Attrill a, Stuart Bearhop b, Brendan J. Godley b, David Grémillet c,d, Keith C. Hamer e, Stephen C. Votier a a Marine Biology & Ecology Research Centre, Marine Institute, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus, Plymouth, Devon PL4 8AA, UK b Centre for Ecology and Conservation, School of Biosciences, University of Exeter, Cornwall Campus, Penryn, Cornwall TR10 9EZ, UK c Centre d’Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive, UMR 5175 du CNRS, 1919 Route de Mende, 34293 Montpellier cedex 5, France d Percy FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology, DST/NRF Centre of Excellence at the University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7701, South Africa e Institute of Integrative & Comparative Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK article info abstract Article history: Seabirds are well monitored and protected at their breeding grounds but spend most of their life at sea, Received 29 March 2011 where they are less well monitored and afforded little protection.
    [Show full text]