DOCSLIB.ORG

5.3 Rainbow Trout and Steelhead

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
5.3 Rainbow Trout and Steelhead ����� �� �� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � ��� � STATE OF MICHIGAN � � � � ������� DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Number 32 October 2004 Michigan Fish Stocking Guidelines II: with Periodic Updates James L. Dexter, Jr. and Richard P. O’Neal Editors www.michigan.gov/dnr/ FISHERIES DIVISION SPECIAL REPORT MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES FISHERIES DIVISION Fisheries Special Report 32 October 2004 Michigan Fish Stocking Guidelines II: with Periodic Updates James L. Dexter, Jr. and Richard P. O’Neal Editors The Michigan Department of Natural Resources (MDNR), provides equal opportunities for employment and access to Michigan’s natural resources. Both State and Federal laws prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, religion, disability, age, sex, height, weight or marital status under the Civil Rights Acts of 1964, as amended, (1976 MI P.A. 453 and 1976 MI P.A. 220, Title V of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and the Americans with Disabilities Act). If you believe that you have been discriminated against in any program, activity or facility, or if you desire additional information, please write the MDNR Office of Legal Services, P.O. Box 30028, Lansing, MI 48909; or the Michigan Department of Civil Rights, State of Michigan, Plaza Building, 1200 6th Ave., Detroit, MI 48226 or the Office of Human Resources, U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Office for Diversity and Civil Rights Programs, 4040 North Fairfax Drive, Arlington, VA. 22203. For information or assistance on this publication, contact the Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Fisheries Division, Box 30446, Lansing, MI 48909, or call 517-373-1280. This publication is available in alternative formats. ����� �� �� � � � � � � � � � � � � Printed under authority of Michigan Department of Natural Resources � � � ��� � � � � Total number of copies printed 135 — Total cost $1,822.98 — Cost per copy $13.50 � ������� Michigan Fish Stocking Guidelines II October 2004 Suggested Citation Format Dexter, J. L., Jr., and R. P. O’Neal, editors. 2004. Michigan fish stocking guidelines II: with periodic updates. Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Fisheries Special Report 32, Ann Arbor. Suggested Citation ii Michigan Fish Stocking Guidelines II October 2004 Acknowledgements This report was compiled by Fisheries Division employees over a several-year period in an effort to update the Department of Natural Resource’s fish stocking guidelines. Substantial effort was put forth to use Michigan research and management examples whenever possible. This is a reflection upon the quality work done by division employees to further the knowledge of these species in our own waters. References from outside of Michigan were also used to either verify our own work, or provide information where it was lacking for Michigan. Contributors to this report are listed alphabetically. James Dexter, Jr. Richard O’Neal Todd Grischke James Schneider Ralph Hay John Schrouder Liz Hay-Chmielewski Kim Scribner Michael Herman Paul Seelbach Jory Jonas Gary Towns Roger Martin Steve Vanderlaan Bill McClay Gary Whelan Andrew Nuhfer Martha Wolgamood Vern Nurenberg Alan D. Sutton, Graphics Tina M. Tincher, Publication Design Ellen S. G. Johnston, Desktop Publisher James C. Schneider and Paul W. Seelbach, Reviewers Approved by James E. Johnson This report will be updated periodically as new advancements in fish stocking are confirmed effective and implemented. Acknowledgements iii Michigan Fish Stocking Guidelines II October 2004 Acknowledgements iv Michigan Fish Stocking Guidelines II October 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................ III TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................V CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION TO MICHIGAN FISH STOCKING GUIDELINES ... 1 1.1 Historical Stocking Perspective...............................................................................2 1.2 References.................................................................................................................3 CHAPTER 2: GENERAL GUIDELINES ................................................................... 1 2.1 Introducing a New Species.......................................................................................1 2.2 Continuous and Supplemental Stocking ................................................................1 2.3 Stocking in Public Waters ........................................................................................1 2.4 Stocking in Private Waters .......................................................................................2 2.5 Genetic Issues...........................................................................................................3 2.6 Fish for Research Purposes.....................................................................................3 2.7 References.................................................................................................................5 2.8 Appendices................................................................................................................7 CHAPTER 3: DEPARTMENTAL PROCEDURES.................................................... 1 3.1 Fish Stocking Request and Review Process..........................................................1 3.2 Allocations, Surpluses, and Shortages of Fish......................................................1 3.3 Fish Transfers............................................................................................................1 3.4 Permits and Inspections for Private Stocking........................................................2 3.5 Reporting ...................................................................................................................2 3.6 References.................................................................................................................3 3.7 Appendices................................................................................................................5 CHAPTER 4: STOCKING GUIDELINES FOR LAKES AND STREAMS................. 1 4.1 Determining the Size of Fish and Time of Year to Stock.......................................1 Trout Size.................................................................................................................... 1 Trout Stocking Period.................................................................................................. 1 Coolwater Species ...................................................................................................... 2 4.2 Great Lakes and Connecting Waters.......................................................................3 Lake Superior.............................................................................................................. 4 Lake Michigan ............................................................................................................. 4 Lake Huron.................................................................................................................. 5 Lake Erie ..................................................................................................................... 6 4.3 Inland Lakes...............................................................................................................9 4.4 Inland Streams.........................................................................................................13 Coldwater Streams and General Stocking Rates...................................................... 13 Top-quality Trout Streams and General Stocking Rates........................................... 16 Top-quality Potamodromous Streams....................................................................... 16 Second-Quality Trout Streams and General Stocking Rates .................................... 17 Second-quality potamodromous streams.................................................................. 17 Warmwater streams .................................................................................................. 17 Potamodromous fish streams general notes............................................................. 18 4.5 Figures .....................................................................................................................19 4.6 Tables.......................................................................................................................27 4.7 References...............................................................................................................37 4.8 Appendices..............................................................................................................41 Table of Contents v Michigan Fish Stocking Guidelines II October 2004 CHAPTER 5: STOCKING GUIDELINES FOR VARIOUS SPECIES OF FISH.........1 5.1 Brown Trout...............................................................................................................1 5.2 Brook Trout................................................................................................................3 5.3 Rainbow Trout and Steelhead..................................................................................5 Lake Michigan ............................................................................................................. 6 Lake Huron.................................................................................................................. 7 Lake Superior.............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fish Survey Report
    Lake Angeline, Marquette County Lake Angeline Fisheries Survey May 3-5, 2015 Introduction: A May 2015 general fisheries survey was conducted at Marquette County’s Lake Angeline to assess the status of the fishery and to allow for the development of future sportfish management opportunities for this lake. History: Lake Angeline has a long history of quality fisheries management with periods of very good rainbow trout occupation and periods of excellent tiger muskellunge presence. The first stocking of rainbow trout occurred in 1948 and continued until 1969. Due to trout competition from yellow perch and other warmwater fish species, tiger muskellunge were stocked, not annually but very regularly, from 1970 – 1990. Citizen opposition and/or support of the muskellunge stocking was very vocal during the muskie years, with many petitions and passionate letters being sent to State legislators and Michigan tenured Governors. Historical data reveals that a natural lake occupied this site before mining operations were ever begun. The water was named Lake Angeline in 1849 by Captain Sam Moody and as the City of Ishpeming developed, the lake was the source of water supply for the community. The lake was pumped dry in 1892 and 20 million tons of iron ore were removed from the rock strata beneath the lake by means of a mining shaft and drifts. Cave-ins after the mining was abandoned created many of the depth pockets of the lake’s bottom topography. The State of Michigan DNR obtained a parcel of property ownership from Cliffs Forest Products Company in November 1984, however the easement to this parcel crossed private land and due to alleged public dumping of trash on the private land, access to the State parcel was severed in 1994.
    [Show full text]
  • BIOLOGICAL FIELD STATION Cooperstown, New York
    BIOLOGICAL FIELD STATION Cooperstown, New York 49th ANNUAL REPORT 2016 STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK COLLEGE AT ONEONTA OCCASIONAL PAPERS PUBLISHED BY THE BIOLOGICAL FIELD STATION No. 1. The diet and feeding habits of the terrestrial stage of the common newt, Notophthalmus viridescens (Raf.). M.C. MacNamara, April 1976 No. 2. The relationship of age, growth and food habits to the relative success of the whitefish (Coregonus clupeaformis) and the cisco (C. artedi) in Otsego Lake, New York. A.J. Newell, April 1976. No. 3. A basic limnology of Otsego Lake (Summary of research 1968-75). W. N. Harman and L. P. Sohacki, June 1976. No. 4. An ecology of the Unionidae of Otsego Lake with special references to the immature stages. G. P. Weir, November 1977. No. 5. A history and description of the Biological Field Station (1966-1977). W. N. Harman, November 1977. No. 6. The distribution and ecology of the aquatic molluscan fauna of the Black River drainage basin in northern New York. D. E Buckley, April 1977. No. 7. The fishes of Otsego Lake. R. C. MacWatters, May 1980. No. 8. The ecology of the aquatic macrophytes of Rat Cove, Otsego Lake, N.Y. F. A Vertucci, W. N. Harman and J. H. Peverly, December 1981. No. 9. Pictorial keys to the aquatic mollusks of the upper Susquehanna. W. N. Harman, April 1982. No. 10. The dragonflies and damselflies (Odonata: Anisoptera and Zygoptera) of Otsego County, New York with illustrated keys to the genera and species. L.S. House III, September 1982. No. 11. Some aspects of predator recognition and anti-predator behavior in the Black-capped chickadee (Parus atricapillus).
    [Show full text]
  • Pennsylvania Muskellunge Management Plan 2017 Update
    This work made possible by funding from the Sport Fish Restoration Act Project F-57-R Fisheries Management. Pennsylvania Muskellunge Management Plan 2017 Update Prepared By: Robert Wnuk, Michael Kaufmann, Brian Ensign, and Robert Brown Acknowledgements We wish to acknowledge the technical assistance of Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources biologists Jeff Scheirer and Tim Simonsin. Their willingness to share their experiences with stocking large Muskellunge fingerlings was invaluable in creating this plan. We also thank Fisheries Management and Hatchery staff from the Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission who reviewed this plan and made numerous substantial contributions. Introduction The Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission (PFBC) published its first Statewide Muskellunge Management Plan in 2012. We provide this bullet point update to the 2012 plan to: 1) determine if the PFBC is meeting plan objectives; 2) deal with new issues in Muskellunge management; and 3) bring interested parties up to date on Muskellunge management in Pennsylvania. IS THE PFBC MEETING PLAN OBJECTIVES? o Objective 1. Improve and standardize the design and sampling methods of all surveys evaluating the management of Muskellunge in Pennsylvania. • Strategy 1: Muskellunge should be a primary species of concern when choosing sampling times and gear to maximize effectiveness and accuracy of surveys in waters where they are managed. Progress: Muskellunge are now a primary target species in PFBC surveys. • Strategy 2. Because of their rarity of catch all efforts should be taken to obtain all possible information on these fish when sampling waters where they are managed even when they are not the primary target of a survey.
    [Show full text]
  • Michigan's Infrastructure
    MICHIGAN BUSINESS SUSTAINABILITY ROUNDTABLE State of the State: Michigan’s Infrastructure Olivia Rath January 2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary 3 Introduction 4 Transportation & Mobility 5 Energy 8 Water 11 Information & Communications 14 Infrastructure & Justice 17 Conclusion & Discussion 19 Appendix A: Potential Infrastructure Investments 21 Appendix B: Resource Guide 23 MICHIGAN BUSINESS SUSTAINABILITY ROUNDTABLE | State of the State of Michigan’s Infrastructure 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY he State of Michigan is well positioned for economic, social and environmental leadership: The combination of engineering talent, powerhouse academic institutions, unparalleled T freshwater ecosystems, automotive and mobility leadership and more distinguish the state on a national level. Appropriately caring for and investing in its infrastructure can help drive the state toward an economically robust, environmentally sustainable and socially just future. • Transportation & Mobility: Building on its history of mobilizing the world, Michigan has an opportunity to demonstrate leadership in future mobility that prioritizes carbon neutrality, public health and safety, and economic strength. Addressing rapidly deteriorating transportation infrastructure is key. • Energy: Given Michigan’s stated goals on carbon neutrality, shifting the state’s energy system to become increasingly digital, decarbonized and distributed is essential. Efforts to upgrade and expand existing aging infrastructure are important as well. • Water: A severe public health crisis has illustrated the consequences of underinvestment and decision-making without adequate community representation. The state has an opportunity to use machine learning to identify and replace hazardous water lines and address stormwater and wastewater vulnerabilities, and move toward a Michigan that is purer for all. • Information & Communications: Enhanced information and communications infrastructure can enable proactive, real-time asset management across all infrastructure.
    [Show full text]
  • An Evaluation of Tiger Muskellunge Introduced Into Lake Carl Etling, Oklahoma Richard A
    33 An Evaluation of Tiger Muskellunge Introduced into Lake Carl Etling, Oklahoma Richard A. Snow Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation, Oklahoma Fishery Research Laboratory, Norman, OK 73072 Chas P. Patterson Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation, Bryon State Fish Hatchery, Burlington, OK 73722 Daniel E. Shoup Department of Natural Resource Ecology & Management, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater OK 74078 Michael J. Porta Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation, Oklahoma Fishery Research Laboratory, Norman, OK 73072 Abstract: Tiger Muskellunge (Muskellunge Esox masquinongy x Northern Pike Esox lucius) were stocked into Lake Carl Etling in the northwestern tip of Oklahoma’s panhandle in Cimarron County. This lake sustained a population of Northern Pike from 1966 – 1976, with natural reproduction maintaining the population until 1986. However, after 1986, periods of drought affecting the lake level and water temperature negatively impacted the Northern Pike population. In 2004, Lake Carl Etling’s surface area was reduced to approximately 4 ha by drought, which negatively affected the sportfish populations. Salt Cedar (Tamarix ramosissima) and other herbaceous vegetation colonized the dry lakebed before rainfall in the summer of 2013 filled Lake Carl Etling to normal elevation. Nongame fish populations became over abundant and Tiger Muskellunge were stocked as biological control and to potentially create a unique trophy fishery. However, through extensive sampling efforts only 1 adult and 76 juveniles (of the 2,656 individuals stocked) were caught. Tiger Muskellunge recruitment was affected by high turbidity and high water temperatures. A combination of increasing turbidity levels and water temperatures, post-stocking, likely resulted in increases in Tiger Muskellunge metabolism. Relative weights (Wr) decreased monthly after stocking in 2016 and 2017, with no fish observed in sampling efforts after July of 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Esox Lucius) Ecological Risk Screening Summary
    Northern Pike (Esox lucius) Ecological Risk Screening Summary U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, February 2019 Web Version, 8/26/2019 Photo: Ryan Hagerty/USFWS. Public Domain – Government Work. Available: https://digitalmedia.fws.gov/digital/collection/natdiglib/id/26990/rec/22. (February 1, 2019). 1 Native Range and Status in the United States Native Range From Froese and Pauly (2019a): “Circumpolar in fresh water. North America: Atlantic, Arctic, Pacific, Great Lakes, and Mississippi River basins from Labrador to Alaska and south to Pennsylvania and Nebraska, USA [Page and Burr 2011]. Eurasia: Caspian, Black, Baltic, White, Barents, Arctic, North and Aral Seas and Atlantic basins, southwest to Adour drainage; Mediterranean basin in Rhône drainage and northern Italy. Widely distributed in central Asia and Siberia easward [sic] to Anadyr drainage (Bering Sea basin). Historically absent from Iberian Peninsula, Mediterranean France, central Italy, southern and western Greece, eastern Adriatic basin, Iceland, western Norway and northern Scotland.” Froese and Pauly (2019a) list Esox lucius as native in Armenia, Azerbaijan, China, Georgia, Iran, Kazakhstan, Mongolia, Turkey, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Albania, Austria, Belgium, Bosnia Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Macedonia, Moldova, Monaco, 1 Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, Ukraine, Canada, and the United States (including Alaska). From Froese and Pauly (2019a): “Occurs in Erqishi river and Ulungur lake [in China].” “Known from the Selenge drainage [in Mongolia] [Kottelat 2006].” “[In Turkey:] Known from the European Black Sea watersheds, Anatolian Black Sea watersheds, Central and Western Anatolian lake watersheds, and Gulf watersheds (Firat Nehri, Dicle Nehri).
    [Show full text]
  • Fishing Regulations, 2020-2021, Available Online, from Your License Distributor, Or Any DNR Service Center
    Wisconsin Fishing.. it's fun and easy! To use this pamphlet, follow these 5 easy steps: Restrictions: Be familiar with What's New on page 4 and the License Requirements 1 and Statewide Fishing Restrictions on pages 8-11. Trout fishing: If you plan to fish for trout, please see the separate inland trout 2 regulations booklet, Guide to Wisconsin Trout Fishing Regulations, 2020-2021, available online, from your license distributor, or any DNR Service Center. Special regulations: Check for special regulations on the water you will be fishing 3 in the section entitled Special Regulations-Listed by County beginning on page 28. Great Lakes, Winnebago System Waters, and Boundary Waters: If you are 4 planning to fish on the Great Lakes, their tributaries, Winnebago System waters or waters bordering other states, check the appropriate tables on pages 64–76. Statewide rules: If the water you will be fishing is not found in theSpecial Regulations- 5 Listed by County and is not a Great Lake, Winnebago system, or boundary water, statewide rules apply. See the regulation table for General Inland Waters on pages 62–63 for seasons, length and bag limits, listed by species. ** This pamphlet is an interpretive summary of Wisconsin’s fishing laws and regulations. For complete fishing laws and regulations, including those that are implemented after the publica- tion of this pamphlet, consult the Wisconsin State Statutes Chapter 29 or the Administrative Code of the Department of Natural Resources. Consult the legislative website - http://docs. legis.wi.gov - for more information. For the most up-to-date version of this pamphlet, go to dnr.wi.gov search words, “fishing regulations.
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Flint Water Crisis Timeline 2009 2010
    Annotated Flint Water Crisis Timeline *Enclosed Document ^Referenced in Documentary 2009 February o Michael Brown serves as Temporary Mayor.^ August o Dayne Walling elected as Mayor.^ September Preliminary Engineering Report Lake Huron Water Supply Karegnondi Water Authority*^ o The third study of the Karegnondi Water Authority (KWA) plan. Prior reports were in 1992 and 2006. This report was meant to study 2 alternatives, continuing purchase of water from Detroit Water and Sewage Department (DWSD) or to build a new pipeline to supply raw water from Lake Huron. o This report clearly states the differences between raw and treated water, and explains in detail the construction costs needed to upgrade Flint’s Water Treatment Plant (WTP) in order to properly treat water. o Additionally, in Appendix 7, the report mentions the lead and copper program and corrosion control requirements, even including the chemical composition of orthophosphate. o An upgrade to the WTP of approximately $7 million would be required in order for the plant to properly treat water on a continuous basis. o These upgrades are necessary to destroy bacteria, viruses, and prevent waterborne disease. Note: At the time of the inception of the KWA, the requirements of treating raw water, upgrades needed to be done for the WTP to properly treat water, and cost estimates of DWSD being more cost effective than the KWA were clear and known to at least two persons, Drain County Commissioner Jeff Wright and Mayor Walling. Both of whom had clear legal, ethical, and patriotic duty to the citizens of Flint as their elected representatives.
    [Show full text]
  • 1980 Ground-Water Data Michigan
    � 1980 GROUND-WATER DATA FOR MICHIGAN BY G.C. HUFFMAN U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Open - File Report 81-811 PREPARED IN COOPERATION WITH THE MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DIVISION CONVERSION FACTORS The following factors may be used to convert the inch-pound units published in this report to the International System of Units (SI). Multiply inch-pound units By To obtain SI units acres (a) 0.4047 hectares (ha) feet (ft) .3048 meters (m) inches (in) 25.4 millimeters (hut) miles (mi) 1.609 kilometers (km) million gallons (106 gal) 3,785 cubic meters (m3) gallons (gal) 3.785 liters (L) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GROUND-WATER DATA FOR MICHIGAN 1980 by G. C. Huffman U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OPEN-FILE REPORT 81-811 Prepared in cooperation with the Michigan Department of Natural Resources Lansing, Michigan 1981 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR JAMES G. WATT, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Doyle G. Frederick, Acting Director For additional information write to: Office of the District Chief Water Resources Division U.S. Geological Survey 6520 Mercantile Way, Suite 5 Lansing, Michigan 48910 CONTENTS Page Introduction 1 Purpose 1 Scope 1 Uses of data in this report 1 Availability of records 2 Other ground-water reports 2 Well-numbering system 9 Ground-water levels 10 Area ground-water data 10 Alpena County 12 Branch County -city of Coldwater 13 Calhoun County -city of Battle Creek 14 Clinton County -city of St. Johns 15 Eaton County -Delta Township 16 Grand Traverse County 17 Ingham County city of Lansing 18 city of Mason 19 East Lansing-Meridian Water Authority 20 Lansing Township 20 Michigan State University 21 Jackson County city of Jackson 22 Kalamazoo County city of Kalamazoo 23 city of Portage 24 Marquette County - Iron Range area 25 Oakland County - Huron-Clinton Metropolitan Authority 26 Oceana County 27 Sanilac County 28 Van Buren County 29 Washtenaw County - city of Ann Arbor 30 -city of Ypsilanti 31 -Ypsilanti Township 32 Tables 33 Selected references 51 iii FIGURES Page 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of Michigan and the Great Lakes
    35133_Geo_Michigan_Cover.qxd 11/13/07 10:26 AM Page 1 “The Geology of Michigan and the Great Lakes” is written to augment any introductory earth science, environmental geology, geologic, or geographic course offering, and is designed to introduce students in Michigan and the Great Lakes to important regional geologic concepts and events. Although Michigan’s geologic past spans the Precambrian through the Holocene, much of the rock record, Pennsylvanian through Pliocene, is miss- ing. Glacial events during the Pleistocene removed these rocks. However, these same glacial events left behind a rich legacy of surficial deposits, various landscape features, lakes, and rivers. Michigan is one of the most scenic states in the nation, providing numerous recre- ational opportunities to inhabitants and visitors alike. Geology of the region has also played an important, and often controlling, role in the pattern of settlement and ongoing economic development of the state. Vital resources such as iron ore, copper, gypsum, salt, oil, and gas have greatly contributed to Michigan’s growth and industrial might. Ample supplies of high-quality water support a vibrant population and strong industrial base throughout the Great Lakes region. These water supplies are now becoming increasingly important in light of modern economic growth and population demands. This text introduces the student to the geology of Michigan and the Great Lakes region. It begins with the Precambrian basement terrains as they relate to plate tectonic events. It describes Paleozoic clastic and carbonate rocks, restricted basin salts, and Niagaran pinnacle reefs. Quaternary glacial events and the development of today’s modern landscapes are also discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • Trout Lake 2013-14
    WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES CREEL SURVEY REPORT TROUT LAKE VILAS COUNTY 2013-14 Treaty Fisheries Publication Compiled by Jason Halverson & Jeff Blonski Treaty Fisheries Technicians CONTENTS INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................. 1 GENERAL LAKE INFORMATION ..................................................................................... 2 Location ........................................................................................................................... 2 Physical Characteristics ................................................................................................... 2 Seasons Surveyed ............................................................................................................. 2 Weather ............................................................................................................................ 2 Sportfishing Regulations .................................................................................................. 2 SPECIES CATCH AND HARVEST INFORMATION ........................................................ 2 CREEL SURVEY RESULTS AND DISCUSSION .............................................................. 3 Survey Logistics ............................................................................................................... 3 General Angler Information ............................................................................................. 3 SPECIES INFORMATION
    [Show full text]
  • Boulder Junction Book 06
    Welcome to BoulderBoulder Junction!Junction! Thank you for your interest in Boulder Junction, THE MUSKY CAPITAL OF THE WORLD®. Surrounded by nearly 240,000 acres of lush state forest and more than 200 sparkling lakes, Boulder Junction offers vacation enjoyment second to none. Whether you want to experience the stunning colors of the forests or catch the big musky in Fall, have family fun on a Summer vacation, enjoy the quiet beauty of Winter in the woods, or the excitement of a Spring fishing trip, whatever the season, Boulder Junction has it for you. We hope that the information contained in this guide will help you to plan an unforgettable Northwoods vacation whatever time of the year you visit. We have many activities to offer all our visitors. For the avid outdoor enthusiast, enjoy a dip in our crystal clear waters, or perhaps a ride in a variety of watercrafts, take advantage of our many trails by hiking, biking, snowmobiling or cross country skiing. Whatever way you go, you will enjoy our pristine scenery. Anglers who visit the Musky Capital of the World® will not only find first class musky fishing but also northern, walleye, trout, bass, perch, and panfish. Boulder Junction has many fine shopping and dining establishments that are widely recognized as among the best that the Northwoods has to offer. Boulder Junction is the perfect year- round location for a week long family vacation, a romantic weekend getaway, a quiet time to "reflect", a fishing or snowmobile mid-week getaway or whatever you desire, Boulder Junction is the perfect place to do it.
    [Show full text]