Heirs' Property and Land Fractionation: Fostering Stable Ownership To

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Heirs' Property and Land Fractionation: Fostering Stable Ownership To United States Department of Agriculture Heirs’ Property and Land Fractionation: Fostering Stable Ownership to Prevent Land Loss and Abandonment Forest Service Southern Research Station e-General Technical Report SRS-244, September 2019 EDITORS Cassandra Johnson Gaither, Research Social Scientist, Southern Research Station, U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Athens, GA 30602; Ann Carpenter, Director of Policy and Analytics, Community and Economic Development, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA 30309; Tracy Lloyd McCurty, Esq., Executive Director, Black Belt Justice Center, Washington, DC 20013; and Sara Toering, Senior Fellow, Center for Community Progress, Atlanta, GA 30311. DISCLAIMER Reference herein to any specific commercial products, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government, and shall not be used for any endorsement purposes. EDITORS’ NOTE Papers published in these proceedings were submitted by authors in electronic media. Editing was done to ensure consistent format. Authors are responsible for content and accuracy of their individual papers. PHOTO CREDIT Covers: Dark wood background, © Can Stock Photo Inc. / rawf8. September 2019 Southern Research Station 200 W.T. Weaver Blvd. Asheville, NC 28804 www.srs.fs.usda.gov Heirs’ Property and Land Fractionation: Fostering Stable Ownership to Prevent Land Loss and Abandonment EDITORS Cassandra Johnson Gaither, Ann Carpenter, Tracy Lloyd McCurty, and Sara Toering ii ABSTRACT Real property passed to subsequent generations via intestate succession (i.e., without a will) is termed a tenancy-in-common, or more colloquially, “heirs’ property.” Property may also be classed as heirs’ property via an intentional simple will that divides real estate assets equally among descendants. With this kind of property ownership, co-heirs hold fractional interests in property that is not physically divided. As such, heirs’ property represents a form of collective ownership. Owners are private property holders but are limited in their ability to use such properties to build wealth because creditors typically do not accept these properties as bona fide collateral. Heirs’ property ownership is thought to be especially prevalent among rural African Americans in the Black Belt South, Appalachian Whites, Hispanics in U.S. southwestern colonia communities, and Native American groups (as fractionated lands). The U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service’s Southern Research Station and the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta hosted a gathering of heirs’ property researchers and direct legal service providers on June 15, 2017 in Atlanta, GA, with the aim to clarify problems associated with tenancies for these groups. The convening was organized into panels which addressed estimations of the extent of heirs’ property in the South, research on cultural aspects of heirs’ property ownership, and experiences of direct legal service providers, and included a discussion of how heirs’ property in urban areas contributes to abandoned and blighted buildings. Collaborators also worked to identify opportunities that would improve data collection, decrease property vulnerability, and better protect generational wealth. These proceedings include papers from many of the conference presenters as well as papers contributed by additional subject matter experts. Keywords: Appalachia, Black Belt, heirs’ property, land fractionation, land loss, Uniform Partition of Heirs Property Act. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD Heirs’ Property: Implications for Natural Resource Management Rob Doudrick . v Heirs’ Property in the Southeast: A Community Development Perspective Raphael Bostic . vii Heirs’ Property Facts: What the Data Reveal BLACK BELT STUDIES Learning about the Land: What Can Tax Appraisal Data Tell Us About Heirs’ Properties? Shana Jones and J. Scott Pippin .................................................. 3 Heirs’ Property and Persistent Poverty among African Americans in the Southeastern United States Conner Bailey, Robert Zabawa, Janice Dyer, Becky Barlow, and Ntam Baharanyi ............ 9 The Sustainable Forestry and African American Land Retention Program John Schelhas, Sarah Hitchner, and Alan McGregor .................................. 20 The Impact of Heirs’ Property at the Community Level: The Case Study of the Prairie Farms Resettlement Community in Macon County, AL Tristeen Bownes and Robert Zabawa ............................................. 29 APPALACHIAN STUDIES Towards a Better Understanding of the Experience of Heirs on Heirs’ Property B. James Deaton and Jamie Baxter ............................................... 44 Appalachia’s “Big White Ghettos”: Exploring the Role of Heirs’ Property in the Reproduction of Housing Vulnerability in Eastern Kentucky Cassandra Johnson Gaither .................................................... 49 continued iv TABLE OF CONTENTS cont . Legal Reform: Native American Buyback, Uniform Partition of Heirs Property Act, and Future Profit Sharing Divided Interests: Growing Complexity of Fractionated Property Rights in Indian Country and Possible Resolutions Patrice H. Kunesh ............................................................ 61 Historic Partition Law Reform: A Game Changer for Heirs’ Property Owners Thomas W. Mitchell .......................................................... 65 Options for Countering the Faustian Bargain in the Judicial Partition of Heirs’ Property and the Enduring Phenomena of Investor-Speculator “Fishing” Phyliss Craig-Taylor ........................................................... 83 Taking It to the People: Essays on the Experiences of Direct Legal Service Providers Addressing Heirs’ Property in Louisiana: Lessons Learned, Post-Disaster Christy Kane, Stephanie Beaugh, and Gerren Sias .................................... 89 African-American Land Tenure and Sustainable Development: Eradicating Poverty and Building Intergenerational Wealth in the Black Belt Region Edward “Jerry” Pennick and Monica Rainge ........................................ 93 The Georgia Heirs Property Law Center, Inc.: Addressing Tangled Title and Economic Security for Georgians Skipper G. StipeMaas ......................................................... 98 AUTHOR CONTACT INFORMATION . .105 FOREWORD v FOREWORD Heirs’ Property: Implications for Natural Resource Management Rob Doudrick, Station Director, Southern Research Station, U .S . Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Asheville, NC 28804 . am honored to highlight research and technical assistance the U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Southern Research Station (SRS) and its partners have completed I in regard to heirs’ property ownership. We have partnered with the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta to produce this publication which showcases some of the engagement taking place around this issue. The SRS represents 13 States extending from Virginia to Texas and Oklahoma. More than 86 percent of the forests in the South are privately owned, and certainly some of these properties are held as heirs’ property, although exact estimates are not known. Because heirs’ properties may be underutilized from an economic and land management perspective, we suspect that challenges surrounding heirs’ property ownership impact these landowners’ ability to manage forested land in terms of wildfire, flooding, and forest pest/disease mitigation. High proportions of rural, (often underserved) African Americans live in counties adjacent to national forests in South Carolina, Georgia, Alabama, and Mississippi, but there is relatively little understanding of how these landowners manage their forest lands or how this management may be impacted by heirs’ property ownership (Hitchner et al. 2017). Similar questions relate to the impact of heirs’ property on forest land management for rural Appalachian landowners (Deaton et al. 2009). One of the Forest Service’s primary goals is the conservation of forest lands—“keeping forests as forests.” Whether it is private, Federal, or State-owned land, the benefits of a forested ecosystem are invaluable. Forests help to clean our water and air, provide important fish and wildlife habitats, support numerous recreation opportunities, and serve as critical carbon sinks. Resolving heirs’ property issues can help landowners to participate in State and Federally- funded programs that encourage adoption of sustainable forest management practices that further these goals. The Forest Service motto is “Caring for the land and serving people.” I like to turn it around and say it starts with people first. We need to care for the people, so they in turn can care for the land. We know that caring for people impacted by heirs’ property issues—e.g., those with minimal technical assistance from State or local forestry agencies, or lack of knowledge and access to programs that could assist with more effective long-term land management—will in turn help us all care for the forests we value. Cassandra Johnson Gaither (SRS Research Social Scientist) and John Schelhas (SRS Research Forester) have been engaged with heirs’ property research for a number of years, in collaboration with numerous partners (Schelhas et al. 2017). Besides the partnership with the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, SRS has partnered with the
Recommended publications
  • Midwest Drought Early Warning System Kickoff Meeting 1
    MIDWEST DROUGHT EARLY WARNING SYSTEM KICKOFF MEETING 1 Include logos of all partners that contributed to meeting on bottom here? MIDWEST DROUGHT EARLY WARNING SYSTEM KICKOFF MEETING 1 Table of Contents Introduction to the Midwest DEWS ......................................................................................... 2 Background..........................................................................................................................................................................2 Midwest DEWS Kick-off Meeting and Planning Process ..................................................................................4 Keynote Speaker Highlights...................................................................................................... 6 Mayor Francis G. Slay, Mayor of the City of St. Louis.........................................................................................6 Colleen Callahan, USDA Rural Development Illinois Director .......................................................................6 Todd Sampsell, Deputy Director of the Missouri DNR......................................................................................7 Highlights of the Presentations and Panel Discussions ...................................................... 7 Day 1 Theme: Laying the Foundation for a Midwest DEWS ..........................................................................7 Day 2 Theme: Current Climate Outlook and Forecasting, Drought Impacts & Vulnerabilities, and Drought Preparedness Resource Needs ........................................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • H. Archibald Kaiser, Professor Schulich School of Law and Department of Psychiatry, Dalhousie University
    H. Archibald Kaiser, Professor Schulich School of Law and Department of Psychiatry, Dalhousie University Outline of Presentation Glimpses of History Criminalization of Persons with Mental Health Problems Factors That Lead to Criminalization Justice System Dysfunctions The Statistics Reducing Criminalization: Investing in Supports and Services A Sample of Benchmarks and Aspirations The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities The Mental Health Strategy for Canada The Canadian Alliance on Mental Illness and Mental Health The Criminal Justice / Mental Health Consensus Project Strategies for Improving the Justice System As Well Diversion Services and Supports Upgrading Police Responses Dalhousie University Ambiguous Crossroads Professor Kaiser Schulich School of Law and Department of Psychiatry 2 Strategies for Improving the Justice System As Well (continued) Addressing Pretrial Issues Improving the Character of Intrusions on Liberty Threats to Human Rights: Reinvigorating Criminalization Erosion of the Social Safety Net More Punitive Approaches to Criminal Justice Policy Alternatives to Current Criminal Justice Policy Conclusion Dalhousie University Ambiguous Crossroads Professor Kaiser Schulich School of Law and Department of Psychiatry 3 Glimpses of History: Ancient Times Mental illness was often attributed to demonic possession or as punishment for sin, sometimes treated by priest-physicians There were harsh methods of dealing with people thought to have angered the gods Mental health problems were
    [Show full text]
  • Post D-Day (June 6, 2016) by Dianne Pothier Professor Emeritus Schulich School of Law at Dalhousie University April 21, 2016
    Post D-Day (June 6, 2016) By Dianne Pothier Professor Emeritus Schulich School of Law at Dalhousie University April 21, 2016 What happens, effective June 7, 2016, if no legislation has been passed by the federal Parliament to amend the Criminal Code respecting medical assistance in dying? Currently, the absolute criminal prohibition on physician-assisted death in Canada is in force (outside Quebec1) subject to an order of a superior court judge authorizing physician- assisted death in any particular case. This judicial authorization is an exception to the suspension of the declaration of invalidity which (outside Quebec) lasts until June 6, 2016 (Carter v Canada (Attorney General) 2016 SCC 4). After that date, if there is no amendment to the Criminal Code, the suspension, and the judicial authorization exception, come to an end, and the declaration of invalidity from Carter 2015 becomes generally effective. Section 241(b) and s. 14 of the Criminal Code unjustifiably infringe s. 7 of the Charter and are of no force or effect to the extent that they prohibit physician-assisted death for a competent adult person who (1) clearly consents to the termination of life and (2) has a grievous and irremediable medical condition (including an illness, disease or disability) that causes enduring suffering that is intolerable to the individual in the circumstances of his or her condition. (Carter v Canada (Attorney General), [2015] 1 SCR 331, paras. 127 and 147) The further stipulation in paragraph 127 that “The scope of this declaration is intended to respond to the factual circumstances in this case.
    [Show full text]
  • Agricultural Marketing Service
    AGRICULTURAL MARKETING SERVICE 2018 President’s Budget Agricultural Marketing Service Contents Page Purpose Statement ....................................................................................................................... 21-1 Statement of Available Funds and Staff Years ............................................................................ 21-9 Permanent Positions by Grade and Staff Year Summary ............................................................ 21-10 Motor Vehicle Fleet Data ............................................................................................................ 21-11 Marketing Services Appropriations Language ........................................................................................................ 21-12 Lead-off Tabular Statement ..................................................................................................... 21-12 Summary of Increases and Decreases ...................................................................................... 21-12 Project Statements .................................................................................................................... 21-13 Justifications ............................................................................................................................ 21-15 Summary of Proposed Legislation ........................................................................................... 21-24 Geographic Breakdown of Obligations and Staff Years .........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Toronto Program
    2018 TORONTO PROGRAM WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY COOLEY LAW SCHOOL ’S 19TH ANNUAL STUDY ABROAD PROGRAM MAY 17 – JUNE 29, 2018 (Revised 5-14-18; 6-4-18) Western Michigan University Cooley Law School is pleased to announce its 19th annual American Bar Association (ABA)-approved study abroad program in Toronto, Canada, during the summer of 2018. Law students will study and live in Toronto for either three or six weeks beginning May 17 and ending June 29. This program is offered in cooperation with the University of St. Michael’s College in the University of Toronto. Nine international and comparative law courses will be taught by law professors, and Canadian jurists and barristers. THE ACADEMIC PROGRAM outstanding museums like the Royal Ontario Museum, the Art Gallery of Ontario, and the The WMU-Cooley foreign study program in Ontario Science Centre. Toronto has been approved by the American Bar Association’s Accreditation Committee of All classes will be conducted on the campus of the Section of Legal Education and Admissions The University of St. Michael’s College. The to the Bar. The program was re-inspected in program director’s office will be on campus June, 2012, receiving approval through 2019. too. St. Michael’s is located on the eastern Classes do not have prerequisites. Each course edge of the University of Toronto’s campus. It is conducted in English by law professors, is just a short walk from the shopping and Canadian attorneys or a jurist and meets the theatre amenities along Bloor and Yonge requirements of the ABA. Streets in the heart of downtown Toronto.
    [Show full text]
  • “Ambiguous Crossroads“: Persons with Mental Health Problems and the Criminal Justice System
    CANADIAN INSTITUTE INSTITUT CANADIEN FOR THE ADMINISTRATION D’ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE DE LA JUSTICE “Ambiguous Crossroads“: Persons with Mental Health Problems and the Criminal Justice System FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 1, 2013 Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University Halifax, Nova Scotia This conference is intended to bring together many of the actors responsible for ensuring equitable treatment for persons with mental health problems who come into contact with the criminal justice system. As many challenging cases have revealed and as the ratification by Canada of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities mandates, this is a time for change. Persons with lived experience and their advocates, police officers, lawyers and judges, among others, will collaborate to present and discuss the latest developments and pre- ferred practices at the often difficult intersection of criminal justice and mental health. The goals of the conference include updating attendees, fostering dis- cussion and enabling participants to emerge with better tools and firmer links to other justice, health and social service professionals and to the community. The program will include : Living in the Community This module will offer an overview of the history of the ways in which the • Defence Counsel will canvass: taking instructions from clients who are criminal justice system has responded to the needs of persons with mental experiencing mental health crises; establishing client service standards health problems and will scrutinize both contemporary reality and future for the mentally distressed client; strategic planning for the client with aspirations. mental health problems: NCR or other use of mental health evidence; A panel comprising persons with lived experience and representatives of effective counsel case law and obligations to the accused with mental the mental health and justice communities will review some of the major health problems; special issues in procedure and practice.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Law Police Powers and the Rule of Law Steve Coughlan, Dalhousie University Schulich School of Law
    Dalhousie University Schulich School of Law From the SelectedWorks of Steve Coughlan 2007 Common Law Police Powers and the Rule of Law Steve Coughlan, Dalhousie University Schulich School of Law Available at: https://works.bepress.com/stephen-coughlan/8/ Common Law Police Powers and the Rule of Law Steve Coughlan* Common law police powers have long been a source of some dispute in the Canadian criminal justice system. On the one hand, their existence is difficult to reconcile with predictability in the law, since in any individual case where a new power is created (generally referred to as use of the "ancillary powers doc- trine"), it would not have been possible to know in advance that the police were actually acting legally. On the other hand the benefit for society purchased with that ambiguity is a more tailored response to the particular problem, which might also lead to better results in future cases. One can reasonably fall into a variety of places on the scale defined by the values of predictability and protec- tion of society. Recently, however, two trends can be observed in the use of common law police powers. Where at one point they were a rarity, and perhaps only served as a safety valve, more frequently today courts seems to regard the use of the ancil- lary powers doctrine as one of the tools always brought to the table. That trend reflects a movement toward the tailoring end and away from the predictability end of the spectrum. The second trend is more worrying. This trend reflects not merely a greater will- ingness to tailor the law for particular fact patterns, but a change in exactly what it means for the police to have a common law police power.
    [Show full text]
  • Print This Article
    Volume 16 (2019) | ISSN 1932-1821 (print) 1932-1996 (online) DOI 10.5195/taxreview.2019.97 | http://taxreview.law.pitt.edu FEMINIST STATUTORY INTERPRETATION Kim Brooks This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. This journal is published by the University Library System of the University of Pittsburgh as part of its D-Scribe Digital Publishing Program, and is cosponsored by the University of Pittsburgh Press. FEMINIST STATUTORY INTERPRETATION Kim Brooks* Leading Canadian scholar Ruth Sullivan describes the act of statutory interpretation as a mix of art and archeology.1 Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Tax Opinions affirms her assessment.2 If the act of statutory interpretation requires us to deploy our interdisciplinary talents, at least somewhat unmoored from the constraints of formal expressions of legal doctrine, why haven’t feminists been more inclined to write about statutory interpretation? Put another way, some scholars acknowledge that judges “are subtly influenced by preconceptions, endemic privilegings and power hierarchies, and prevailing social norms and ‘conventional’ wisdom.”3 Those influences become the background for how judges read legislation.4 Yet, there is surprisingly little literature about how feminists (or feminist decision- makers) do or could approach statutory interpretation projects.5 Feminist Judgments offers concrete illustrations of how feminists, charged with authoring feminist judgments, go about the work of statutory interpretation in tax law.6 The editors of the collection did not constrain the * Professor of Law, Purdy Crawford Chair in Business Law, Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University. 1 RUTH SULLIVAN, STATUTORY INTERPRETATION 29 (3d ed.
    [Show full text]
  • 510-260 Merton St
    MOHAMED F. KHIMJI Faculty of Law, Queen’s University 128 Union Street Kingston, ON K7L 3N6 613.533.6000 x74282 [email protected] EDUCATION LL.M. 2003 London School of Economics and Political Science, with Distinction LL.B. 1999 University of Bristol, with Honours 2 : 1 ACADEMIC APPOINTMENTS AND PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE 2018-Present Director, Business Law Program, Faculty of Law, Queen’s University 2016-Present David Allgood Professor in Business Law, Faculty of Law, Queen’s University 2016-Present Associate Professor, Faculty of Law, Queen’s University Fall 2018 Associate Research Scholar in Law, Yale Law School 2015-2016 Stephen Dattels Chair in Corporate Finance Law, Faculty of Law, Western University 2010-2016 Associate Professor, Faculty of Law, Western University 2013-2014 Visiting Scholar, Department of Commercial Law, Faculty of Law, University of Valencia 2009-2010 Associate Professor, Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University 2004-2009 Assistant Professor, Dalhousie Law School (now Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University) 2003-2004 Associate, Torys LLP, Toronto, ON 2001-2002 Student-at-Law, Torys LLP, Toronto, ON TEACHING EXPERIENCE AND AWARDS Courses Taught: Business Organizations, Commercial Law (Secured Transactions and Sales), Mergers & Acquisitions, Intermediated Securities, Shareholder Activism, Property 2019-2020 The Stanley M. Corbett Award for Excellence in Teaching, Faculty of Law, Queen’s University SERVICE AND PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES 2021-Present Director and Member of Finance Committee, Prince Edward
    [Show full text]
  • Schulich School of Law Appointments 2021
    SCHULICH SCHOOL OF LAW DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY The Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University, invites applications for two probationary tenure-track, tenure-track or tenured appointments at the rank of Assistant or Associate Professor, to commence July 1, 2022 in the areas of Torts; Business Law (broadly defined, but applicants should have an interest in teaching fundamental corporate and commercial law courses); Law and Technology (with complementary interests in intellectual property, cybersecurity, data protection, and related ethical and regulatory issues). We are especially interested in applications from scholars who have research and teaching interests in more than one of these areas and whose work would otherwise advance the Law School’s research and teaching priorities, including the work of our Marine and Environmental Law Institute and our Law and Technology Institute. Dalhousie University and the Schulich School of Law are committed to fostering a collegial culture grounded in diversity and inclusiveness. We encourage applications from Indigenous persons, persons with a disability, racially visible persons, women, persons of a minority sexual orientation and/or gender identity, and all candidates who would contribute to the diversity of our community. For more information, please visit https://www.dal.ca/hringfordiversity. Applicants should have an outstanding academic record, a record of scholarly engagement, and demonstrated (or potential) teaching and research excellence. At the time of appointment, the successful candidate will hold an LL.B. or J.D. degree and is expected to have a relevant Master’s degree or a doctorate (completed or in progress). The deadline for applications is September 30, 2021. About the Schulich School of Law We are a vibrant, collegial, and close-knit community of faculty and students from around the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic Non-Discrimination Act
    Does the Attorney General have a duty to defend her legislature’s statutes? A comment on the Reference Re Genetic Non-Discrimination Act A N D R E W FLAVELLE MARTIN * ABSTRACT The Reference Re Genetic Non-Discrimination Act was unusual because the Attorney General for Canada argued that federal legislation was unconstitutional. In this comment, I explore the implications of this choice for the role of the Attorney General and her relationship with Parliament. I argue that the Attorney General has a duty not to defend legislation, including legislation that began as a private member’s bill, that she reasonably believes to be unconstitutional – and that if Parliament wants to defend such legislation, it should do so itself instead of relying on the Attorney General. If Parliament does not do so, the Attorney General should support the appointment of amicus. However, where the Attorney General advises Parliament during the legislative process that a bill is unconstitutional, Parliament’s rejection of that advice is legally irrelevant and not wrongful. That rejection should nonetheless prompt the Attorney General to resign, if indeed she is the lawyer to the legislature. Keywords: Attorney General; Legislation; Parliament; Legislatures; Federalism * Of the Ontario Bar; Assistant Professor, Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University. Thanks to Elaine Craig for suggesting that I consider writing about this case and to Adam Dodek for comments on a draft. Special thanks to Bruce Ryder, Doug Mitchell, and Alexander Pless. Does the Attorney General Have a Duty to Defend221 INTRODUCTION oes the Attorney General have a duty to defend legislation passed by her respective legislature? For example, does the Attorney D General for Canada have a duty to defend Parliament’s legislation? To put it another way, is it ever appropriate for the Attorney General for Canada to concede or actively argue that federal legislation is unconstitutional? The Attorney General has a unique and multifaceted role, but some facets are underdeveloped in the case law and literature.
    [Show full text]
  • 31 January 2017 31 Janvier 2017 the Honourable Ahmed D. Hussen L'honorable Ahmed D. Hussen Minister of Immigration, Refugees
    31 January 2017 31 janvier 2017 The Honourable Ahmed D. Hussen L’Honorable Ahmed D. Hussen Minister of Immigration, Refugees and Ministre de l’Immigration, des Réfugiés et de la Citizenship Citoyenneté 365 Laurier Avenue West 365, avenue Laurier Ouest Ottawa, Ontario (K1A 1L1) Ottawa (Ontario) K1A 1L1 CC: c. c. The Right Honorable Justin Trudeau Le très honorable Justin Trudeau Prime Minister of Canada Premier ministre du Canada The Honourable Serge Cormier L’Honorable Serge Cormier Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Secrétaire parlementaire du ministre de Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship l'Immigration, des Réfugiés et de la Citoyenneté Re: Suspending Safe Third Country Agreement Objet : Suspension de l’Entente sur les tiers pays sûrs Dear Minister Hussen / Cher Monsieur le Ministre Hussen, We, the undersigned law professors, call on the Canadian government to immediately suspend directing back refugee claimants at the Canada-US border under the Safe Third Country Agreement. Canada's immigration legislation indicates that, in determining whether a country should be designated as "safe" for refugees, consideration must be given to the country's human rights record and to whether the country complies with the 1951 Refugee Convention and the Convention against Torture. Executive orders issued by President Trump demonstrate that the US is not "safe" for refugees. These include a ban on Syrian refugees and a bar on entry of nationals of seven mostly Muslim countries. It is also evident that administration of the executive orders through border enforcement has been chaotic, inconsistent and arbitrary. This exposes refugees to yet more risk. Additional statements issued by the President also indicate that the US is not "safe", including his call for a ban on entry for all Muslims and his suggestion that he is open to considering the use of torture.
    [Show full text]