Saying 'Goodbye' to Voyager 1 & 2 | the Week

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Saying 'Goodbye' to Voyager 1 & 2 | the Week 2016NoCoAstro SAYING ‘GOODBYE’ TO VOYAGER 1 & 2 | THE WEEK NASA uses modern technology in the fight to keep our dying spacecraft alive. OUR JOURNEY CONTINUES Neptune was the first planet located by mathematical predictions instead of direct observations of the sky. How do you discover a planet, anyway? EDITOR Amanda Bell CONTACT Questions, comments, submissions, photos or just to say ‘hello’: ObjView at NoCoAstro dot org November NoCoAstro NOCOASTRO MEETING Date: Thursday December 1st, 6:15pm Location: Fort Collins Museum of Discovery Speaker: Earth’s Aurora and Radiation Belts: Exploration on the Edge of Space with Dr. David Malaspina DID YOU KNOW…? All meetings are FREE & open to the public! Just stop by the Fort Collins Museum of Discovery. NOCOASTRO OUTREACH* 3rd & 17th, Saturday Fossil Creek Reservoir, 7pm 7th, Wednesday Poudre Learning Ctre, 7pm November 30th, Friday Fossil Creek Reservoir, 7:30pm DECEMBER * more details online at: NoCoAstro.org T RUE BLUE ORIGIN OF NAME: Discovered 23 September 1846, Neptune was named after the Roman god of the sea (which equates to the Greek god of the sea, Poseidon). MOONS: A few weeks after Neptune’s discovery, astronomers began to notice moon(s). Only Triton - the largest & only spherical moon - could be observed by technology at the time. Later, mid-20th century improvements in ground-based telescopes and space probes allowed discovery of Neptune’s 13 (maybe 14) satellites, all named for minor Greek water deities. ATMOSPHERE: Even though Neptune is the farthest planet from the sun (and so receives the least energy from the sun), Neptune’s weather patterns are driven by the strongest sustained winds in the solar system — recorded at over 1,200 mph (or 2,000 km/hr). Earth’s most powerful storms reach only 250 mph! During Voyager 2’s visit in 1989, the ‘Great Dark Spot’, a storm large enough to contain the entire Earth, was seen moving at an incredible 750 miles per hour. You will probably not be surprised to hear that, as an ice giant, Neptune’s atmosphere is composed mostly of hydrogen, helium and methane. Like Uranus, Neptune is visibly blue because of the methane in its atmosphere. MAGNETOSPHERE: Neptune’s magnetic field is tilted about 47 degrees off the planet’s rotation axis. Like Uranus, with an equally off-balance magnetic field and axis of planetary rotation, Neptune’s magnetosphere experiences wild variations. At an amazing 25x Earth’s magnetic field strength, it is believed to originate in an ionized convecting fluid-ice mantle. SIZE: SURFACE AREA: over 2.9 billion square miles [14.98x Earth SA]. EQUATORIAL CIRCUMFERENCE: ~96k miles [3.86x Earth]. VOLUME: 6.25 x 10^13 km cubed [almost 58x Earth volume]. MASS: 1.02 x 10^26 kg [17.15x Earth mass]. MEAN DENSITY: 1.638 g/cm cubed [almost 30% Earth density]. Neptune, as expected, is much larger than earth but also much less dense. November NoCoAstro RINGS: It wasn't until the mid 1980s and the Voyager 2 mission — around 140 years after astronomers discovered Neptune — that scientists discovered Neptune had rings! Neptune GRAVITY: Neptune, though much larger than Earth, has a surface gravity of only 11.15 m/s Rules: squared [that's just 1.14x Earth’s surface gravity of 9.807 m/s squared or 1 g]. Do you know why? Which Kuiper Belt DISTANCE FROM SUN: Neptune has an almost perfectly circular orbit approximately objects are under 30 AU or roughly 30x Earth distance from sun of 1 AU. Traveling at just 0.182x Earth’s orbital speed, its influence? Neptune orbits the sun once for every 164.79 Earth orbits. Neptune’s weirdly-circular orbit means that other celestial bodies with far more eccentric orbits may actually cross Neptune’s path! Such is the case for Pluto, whose distance from the sun is generally greater than Neptune; however, for about 20 years of Neptune’s 164.79 year orbit, Pluto is actually nearer to the sun than Neptune! ROTATION: Neptune is rotating on its axis quickly, once every 16.11 Earth hours. [this is 0.67x Earth rotation]. EQUATORIAL INCLINATION: With an inclination very similar to Earth’s of 28.3 degrees, Neptune experiences similar seasonal variations in a response to variations in sunlight — yes, even at this distance! You learned last month that Saturn’s seasons last about 7 years each. On Neptune, where one orbit around the sun requires nearly 165 Earth years, seasons actuall last about 40 years! PLANETARY ALBEDO: Two common astronomical albedos used are geometric albedo & bond albedo, which can vary widely for any celestial body. Neptune’s bond albedo of 0.29, which includes all possible scattered light from Neptune, is the lowest of the solar system’s giant planets. TEMPERATURE VARIATION: The wild & windy atmosphere of Neptune receives 1/2 the solar radiation of Uranus and 1/1000th as much as Earth but isn’t actually the coldest planet in the solar system. Neptune averages -353 degrees November F or -214 degrees C [compare to Earth’s average temperature of 59 degrees F or 15 degrees C]! MISSIONS TO NEPTUNE: VOYAGER 2: In 1989, Voyager 2 became the first (and so far only) spacecraft to visit Neptune. This was also “the last picture show” of the Voyager mission’s tour of the solar system. NoCoAstro W HAT IS AN ICE C RYPTIC T RITON: C ONCEALED G IANT, ANYWAY? Triton: E XTRAORDINARY Short answer: it’s complicated. • is Neptune’s only moon containing C OMPOUNDS: enough mass to become spheroidal We classify ice giants separately from in shape. What surprises are Neptune & the gas giants because their Uranus hiding? composition is dominated by ice rather • is the only large moon in the solar than gas. system with a retrograde orbit At the high pressures typical inside (meaning it was captured instead of giant planets, exotic molecular and Sounds simple enough, doesn’t it? Don’t formed around Neptune!) polymeric compounds are formed. be fooled. • is the only moon in the solar Several substances, ‘forbidden’ in system with clouds and a planet-like classical chemistry’, may be stable at atmosphere! high pressures. These include previously-unknown variants of salt and • is extremely cold (-391 degrees F) even new oxides of magnesium, silicon yet has geysers spewing icy material and aluminum! 5-miles from its surface! • will one day reach the Roche Limit around Neptune, tearing itself apart. November EXTRA! EXTRA! READ ALL ABOUT IT! What can you look forward to in your next & final edition of this newsletter? KUIPER BELT: Disc-shaped region with (probably) hundreds of thousands of icy bodies. PLANET NINE: How do we know it’s there & what exactly is it? EXOPLANETS: Moving beyond our solar system, every Trekkies dream! THE LOCAL GROUP: over 30 gravitationally- November bound galaxies. OBSERVABLE UNIVERSE: Did it just get more crowded in here? PRESIDENT Trevor Moriarty: pres at NoCoAstro dot org VICE PRESIDENT Bob Michael: vp at NoCoAstro dot org TREASURER & OUTREACH Greg Halac: treas at NoCoAstro dot org SECRETARY Dave Karp: sec at NoCoAstro dot org NEWSLETTER EDITOR Amanda Bell: ObjView at NoCoAstro dot org WEBSITE WE WANT Paul Fleming: web-edit at NoCoAstro dot org TO HEAR FROM YOU! November NoCoAstro “We each want to be the one to find it.” Scott Sheppard, Carnegie Institution for Science November January PLANET NINE IS PLAYING HIDE & SEEK | AAAS Objects beyond Neptune provide fresh evidence for Planet Nine. JOIN US! WWW.NOCOASTRO.ORG FACEBOOK.COM/NOCOASTRO SEE YOU ONLINE! November NoCoAstro.
Recommended publications
  • Observational Constraints on Surface Characteristics of Comet Nuclei
    Observational Constraints on Surface Characteristics of Comet Nuclei Humberto Campins ([email protected] u) Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, University of Arizona Yanga Fernandez University of Hawai'i Abstract. Direct observations of the nuclear surfaces of comets have b een dicult; however a growing number of studies are overcoming observational challenges and yielding new information on cometary surfaces. In this review, we fo cus on recent determi- nations of the alb edos, re ectances, and thermal inertias of comet nuclei. There is not much diversity in the geometric alb edo of the comet nuclei observed so far (a range of 0.025 to 0.06). There is a greater diversity of alb edos among the Centaurs, and the sample of prop erly observed TNOs (2) is still to o small. Based on their alb edos and Tisserand invariants, Fernandez et al. (2001) estimate that ab out 5% of the near-Earth asteroids have a cometary origin, and place an upp er limit of 10%. The agreement between this estimate and two other indep endent metho ds provide the strongest constraint to date on the fraction of ob jects that comets contribute to the p opulation of near-Earth asteroids. There is a diversity of visible colors among comets, extinct comet candidates, Centaurs and TNOs. Comet nuclei are clearly not as red as the reddest Centaurs and TNOs. What Jewitt (2002) calls ultra-red matter seems to be absent from the surfaces of comet nuclei. Rotationally resolved observations of b oth colors and alb edos are needed to disentangle the e ects of rotational variability from other intrinsic qualities.
    [Show full text]
  • Modeling Super-Earth Atmospheres in Preparation for Upcoming Extremely Large Telescopes
    Modeling Super-Earth Atmospheres In Preparation for Upcoming Extremely Large Telescopes Maggie Thompson1 Jonathan Fortney1, Andy Skemer1, Tyler Robinson2, Theodora Karalidi1, Steph Sallum1 1University of California, Santa Cruz, CA; 2Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ ExoPAG 19 January 6, 2019 Seattle, Washington Image Credit: NASA Ames/JPL-Caltech/T. Pyle Roadmap Research Goals & Current Atmosphere Modeling Selecting Super-Earths for State of Super-Earth Tool (Past & Present) Follow-Up Observations Detection Preliminary Assessment of Future Observatories for Conclusions & Upcoming Instruments’ Super-Earths Future Work Capabilities for Super-Earths M. Thompson — ExoPAG 19 01/06/19 Research Goals • Extend previous modeling tool to simulate super-Earth planet atmospheres around M, K and G stars • Apply modified code to explore the parameter space of actual and synthetic super-Earths to select most suitable set of confirmed exoplanets for follow-up observations with JWST and next-generation ground-based telescopes • Inform the design of advanced instruments such as the Planetary Systems Imager (PSI), a proposed second-generation instrument for TMT/GMT M. Thompson — ExoPAG 19 01/06/19 Current State of Super-Earth Detections (1) Neptune Mass Range of Interest Earth Data from NASA Exoplanet Archive M. Thompson — ExoPAG 19 01/06/19 Current State of Super-Earth Detections (2) A Approximate Habitable Zone Host Star Spectral Type F G K M Data from NASA Exoplanet Archive M. Thompson — ExoPAG 19 01/06/19 Atmosphere Modeling Tool Evolution of Atmosphere Model • Solar System Planets & Moons ~ 1980’s (e.g., McKay et al. 1989) • Brown Dwarfs ~ 2000’s (e.g., Burrows et al. 2001) • Hot Jupiters & Other Giant Exoplanets ~ 2000’s (e.g., Fortney et al.
    [Show full text]
  • The Subsurface Habitability of Small, Icy Exomoons J
    A&A 636, A50 (2020) Astronomy https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201937035 & © ESO 2020 Astrophysics The subsurface habitability of small, icy exomoons J. N. K. Y. Tjoa1,?, M. Mueller1,2,3, and F. F. S. van der Tak1,2 1 Kapteyn Astronomical Institute, University of Groningen, Landleven 12, 9747 AD Groningen, The Netherlands e-mail: [email protected] 2 SRON Netherlands Institute for Space Research, Landleven 12, 9747 AD Groningen, The Netherlands 3 Leiden Observatory, Leiden University, Niels Bohrweg 2, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands Received 1 November 2019 / Accepted 8 March 2020 ABSTRACT Context. Assuming our Solar System as typical, exomoons may outnumber exoplanets. If their habitability fraction is similar, they would thus constitute the largest portion of habitable real estate in the Universe. Icy moons in our Solar System, such as Europa and Enceladus, have already been shown to possess liquid water, a prerequisite for life on Earth. Aims. We intend to investigate under what thermal and orbital circumstances small, icy moons may sustain subsurface oceans and thus be “subsurface habitable”. We pay specific attention to tidal heating, which may keep a moon liquid far beyond the conservative habitable zone. Methods. We made use of a phenomenological approach to tidal heating. We computed the orbit averaged flux from both stellar and planetary (both thermal and reflected stellar) illumination. We then calculated subsurface temperatures depending on illumination and thermal conduction to the surface through the ice shell and an insulating layer of regolith. We adopted a conduction only model, ignoring volcanism and ice shell convection as an outlet for internal heat.
    [Show full text]
  • Limb Polarization of Uranus and Neptune I
    A&A 452, 657–668 (2006) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20053273 & c ESO 2006 Astrophysics Limb polarization of Uranus and Neptune I. Imaging polarimetry and comparison with analytic models H. M. Schmid1, F. Joos1, and D. Tschan1,2 1 Institut für Astronomie, ETH Zürich, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland e-mail: [email protected] 2 Alte Kantonsschule Aarau, Bahnhofstrasse 91, 5001 Aarau, Switzerland Received 20 April 2005 / Accepted 10 January 2006 ABSTRACT Imaging polarimetry of Uranus and Neptune in the R, i,andz bands are presented. In all observations a radial limb polarization on the order of 1% was detected with a position angle perpendicular to the limb. The polarization is higher in both planets for the shorter wavelength bands. As a first approximation, the polarization seems to be equally strong along the entire limb. This is unlike Jupiter and Saturn, where significant limb polarization is only observed at the poles. We determined flux-weighted averages of the limb polarization and radial limb polarization profiles, and investigated the degradation and cancellation effects in the polarization signal due to the seeing-limited spatial resolution of our observations. Taking this into account we derived corrected values for the limb polarization in Uranus and Neptune. The results are compared with analytic models for Rayleigh scattering atmospheres for the semi-infinite case and finite layers with ground albedo. The comparison shows that the detected polarization is compatible with expectations. This indicates that limb-polarization measurements offer a powerful diagnostic tool for investigating the properties of scattering particles in the upper atmospheres of Uranus and Neptune, in particular if more sophisticated numerical modeling of the limb polarization becomes available.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1009.3071V1 [Astro-Ph.EP] 16 Sep 2010 Eovdfo T Aetsa–R Oiae Yrflce Lig Reflected by Dominated AU– Star–Are 1 Parent About Al Its Than the from Larger Stars
    ApJ accepted Exoplanet albedo spectra and colors as a function of planet phase, separation, and metallicity Kerri L. Cahoy, Mark S. Marley NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035 [email protected] and Jonathan J. Fortney University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064 ABSTRACT First generation space-based optical coronagraphic telescopes will obtain images of cool gas and ice giant exoplanets around nearby stars. The albedo spectra of exoplan- ets lying at planet-star separations larger than about 1 AU–where an exoplanet can be resolved from its parent star–are dominated by reflected light to beyond 1 µm and are punctuated by molecular absorption features. Here we consider how exoplanet albedo spectra and colors vary as a function of planet-star separation, metallicity, mass, and observed phase for Jupiter and Neptune analogs from 0.35 to 1 µm. We model Jupiter analogs with 1 and 3 the solar abundance of heavy elements, and Neptune analogs × × with 10 and 30 solar abundance of heavy elements. Our model planets orbit a solar × × analog parent star at separations of 0.8 AU, 2 AU, 5 AU, and 10 AU. We use a radiative- convective model to compute temperature-pressure profiles. The giant exoplanets are found to be cloud-free at 0.8 AU, possess H2O clouds at 2 AU, and have both NH3 arXiv:1009.3071v1 [astro-ph.EP] 16 Sep 2010 and H2O clouds at 5 AU and 10 AU. For each model planet we compute moderate resolution (R = λ/∆λ 800) albedo spectra as a function of phase.
    [Show full text]
  • The Longevity of Water Ice on Ganymedes and Europas Around Migrated Giant Planets
    The Astrophysical Journal, 839:32 (9pp), 2017 April 10 https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa67ea © 2017. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. The Longevity of Water Ice on Ganymedes and Europas around Migrated Giant Planets Owen R. Lehmer1, David C. Catling1, and Kevin J. Zahnle2 1 Dept. of Earth and Space Sciences/Astrobiology Program, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; [email protected] 2 NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, USA Received 2017 February 17; revised 2017 March 14; accepted 2017 March 18; published 2017 April 11 Abstract The gas giant planets in the Solar System have a retinue of icy moons, and we expect giant exoplanets to have similar satellite systems. If a Jupiter-like planet were to migrate toward its parent star the icy moons orbiting it would evaporate, creating atmospheres and possible habitable surface oceans. Here, we examine how long the surface ice and possible oceans would last before being hydrodynamically lost to space. The hydrodynamic loss rate from the moons is determined, in large part, by the stellar flux available for absorption, which increases as the giant planet and icy moons migrate closer to the star. At some planet–star distance the stellar flux incident on the icy moons becomes so great that they enter a runaway greenhouse state. This runaway greenhouse state rapidly transfers all available surface water to the atmosphere as vapor, where it is easily lost from the small moons. However, for icy moons of Ganymede’s size around a Sun-like star we found that surface water (either ice or liquid) can persist indefinitely outside the runaway greenhouse orbital distance.
    [Show full text]
  • Absolute Magnitude and Slope Parameter G Calibration of Asteroid 25143 Itokawa
    Meteoritics & Planetary Science 44, Nr 12, 1849–1852 (2009) Abstract available online at http://meteoritics.org Absolute magnitude and slope parameter G calibration of asteroid 25143 Itokawa Fabrizio BERNARDI1, 2*, Marco MICHELI1, and David J. THOLEN1 1Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawai‘i, 2680 Woodlawn Drive, Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96822, USA 2Dipartimento di Matematica, Università di Pisa, Largo Pontecorvo 5, 56127 Pisa, Italy *Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] (Received 12 December 2008; revision accepted 27 May 2009) Abstract–We present results from an observing campaign of 25143 Itokawa performed with the 2.2 m telescope of the University of Hawai‘i between November 2000 and September 2001. The main goal of this paper is to determine the absolute magnitude H and the slope parameter G of the phase function with high accuracy for use in determining the geometric albedo of Itokawa. We found a value of H = 19.40 and a value of G = 0.21. INTRODUCTION empirical relation between a polarization curve and the albedo. Our work will take advantage by the post-encounter The present work was performed as part of our size determination obtained by Hayabusa, allowing a more collaboration with NASA to support the space mission direct conversion of the ground-based photometric Hayabusa (MUSES-C), which in September 2005 had a information into a physically meaningful value for the albedo. rendezvous with the near-Earth asteroid 25143 Itokawa. We Another important goal of these observations was to used the 2.2 m telescope of the University of Hawai‘i at collect more data for a possible future detection of the Mauna Kea.
    [Show full text]
  • The Spherical Bolometric Albedo of Planet Mercury
    The Spherical Bolometric Albedo of Planet Mercury Anthony Mallama 14012 Lancaster Lane Bowie, MD, 20715, USA [email protected] 2017 March 7 1 Abstract Published reflectance data covering several different wavelength intervals has been combined and analyzed in order to determine the spherical bolometric albedo of Mercury. The resulting value of 0.088 +/- 0.003 spans wavelengths from 0 to 4 μm which includes over 99% of the solar flux. This bolometric result is greater than the value determined between 0.43 and 1.01 μm by Domingue et al. (2011, Planet. Space Sci., 59, 1853-1872). The difference is due to higher reflectivity at wavelengths beyond 1.01 μm. The average effective blackbody temperature of Mercury corresponding to the newly determined albedo is 436.3 K. This temperature takes into account the eccentricity of the planet’s orbit (Méndez and Rivera-Valetín. 2017. ApJL, 837, L1). Key words: Mercury, albedo 2 1. Introduction Reflected sunlight is an important aspect of planetary surface studies and it can be quantified in several ways. Mayorga et al. (2016) give a comprehensive set of definitions which are briefly summarized here. The geometric albedo represents sunlight reflected straight back in the direction from which it came. This geometry is referred to as zero phase angle or opposition. The phase curve is the amount of sunlight reflected as a function of the phase angle. The phase angle is defined as the angle between the Sun and the sensor as measured at the planet. The spherical albedo is the ratio of sunlight reflected in all directions to that which is incident on the body.
    [Show full text]
  • Phase Integral of Asteroids Vasilij G
    A&A 626, A87 (2019) Astronomy https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201935588 & © ESO 2019 Astrophysics Phase integral of asteroids Vasilij G. Shevchenko1,2, Irina N. Belskaya2, Olga I. Mikhalchenko1,2, Karri Muinonen3,4, Antti Penttilä3, Maria Gritsevich3,5, Yuriy G. Shkuratov2, Ivan G. Slyusarev1,2, and Gorden Videen6 1 Department of Astronomy and Space Informatics, V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, 4 Svobody Sq., Kharkiv 61022, Ukraine e-mail: [email protected] 2 Institute of Astronomy, V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, 4 Svobody Sq., Kharkiv 61022, Ukraine 3 Department of Physics, University of Helsinki, Gustaf Hällströmin katu 2, 00560 Helsinki, Finland 4 Finnish Geospatial Research Institute FGI, Geodeetinrinne 2, 02430 Masala, Finland 5 Institute of Physics and Technology, Ural Federal University, Mira str. 19, 620002 Ekaterinburg, Russia 6 Space Science Institute, 4750 Walnut St. Suite 205, Boulder CO 80301, USA Received 31 March 2019 / Accepted 20 May 2019 ABSTRACT The values of the phase integral q were determined for asteroids using a numerical integration of the brightness phase functions over a wide phase-angle range and the relations between q and the G parameter of the HG function and q and the G1, G2 parameters of the HG1G2 function. The phase-integral values for asteroids of different geometric albedo range from 0.34 to 0.54 with an average value of 0.44. These values can be used for the determination of the Bond albedo of asteroids. Estimates for the phase-integral values using the G1 and G2 parameters are in very good agreement with the available observational data.
    [Show full text]
  • An Evolving Astrobiology Glossary
    Bioastronomy 2007: Molecules, Microbes, and Extraterrestrial Life ASP Conference Series, Vol. 420, 2009 K. J. Meech, J. V. Keane, M. J. Mumma, J. L. Siefert, and D. J. Werthimer, eds. An Evolving Astrobiology Glossary K. J. Meech1 and W. W. Dolci2 1Institute for Astronomy, 2680 Woodlawn Drive, Honolulu, HI 96822 2NASA Astrobiology Institute, NASA Ames Research Center, MS 247-6, Moffett Field, CA 94035 Abstract. One of the resources that evolved from the Bioastronomy 2007 meeting was an online interdisciplinary glossary of terms that might not be uni- versally familiar to researchers in all sub-disciplines feeding into astrobiology. In order to facilitate comprehension of the presentations during the meeting, a database driven web tool for online glossary definitions was developed and participants were invited to contribute prior to the meeting. The glossary was downloaded and included in the conference registration materials for use at the meeting. The glossary web tool is has now been delivered to the NASA Astro- biology Institute so that it can continue to grow as an evolving resource for the astrobiology community. 1. Introduction Interdisciplinary research does not come about simply by facilitating occasions for scientists of various disciplines to come together at meetings, or work in close proximity. Interdisciplinarity is achieved when the total of the research expe- rience is greater than the sum of its parts, when new research insights evolve because of questions that are driven by new perspectives. Interdisciplinary re- search foci often attack broad, paradigm-changing questions that can only be answered with the combined approaches from a number of disciplines.
    [Show full text]
  • Astronomy Astrophysics
    A&A 641, A76 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202037625 Astronomy & © Ö. H. Detre et al. 2020 Astrophysics Herschel-PACS photometry of the five major moons of Uranus? Ö. H. Detre1, T. G. Müller2, U. Klaas1, G. Marton3,4, H. Linz1, and Z. Balog1,5 1 Max-Planck-Institut für Astronomie (MPIA), Königstuhl 17, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany e-mail: [email protected] 2 Max-Planck-Institut für extraterrestrische Physik (MPE), PO Box 1312, Giessenbachstraße, 85741 Garching, Germany 3 Konkoly Observatory, Research Centre for Astronomy and Earth Sciences, Konkoly Thege-Miklós 15-17, 1121 Budapest, Hungary 4 ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Institute of Physics, Pázmány Péter 1/A, 1171 Budapest, Hungary 5 Astronomisches Recheninstitut des Zentrums für Astronomie, Mönchhofstrasse 12–14, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany Received 30 January 2020 / Accepted 9 June 2020 ABSTRACT Aims. We aim to determine far-infrared fluxes at 70, 100, and 160 µm for the five major Uranus satellites, Titania, Oberon, Umbriel, Ariel, and Miranda. Our study is based on the available calibration observations at wavelengths taken with the PACS photometer aboard the Herschel Space Observatory. Methods. The bright image of Uranus was subtracted using a scaled Uranus point spread function (PSF) reference established from all maps of each wavelength in an iterative process removing the superimposed moons. The photometry of the satellites was performed using PSF photometry. Thermophysical models of the icy moons were fitted to the photometry of each measurement epoch and auxiliary data at shorter wavelengths. Results. The best-fit thermophysical models provide constraints for important properties of the moons, such as surface roughness and thermal inertia.
    [Show full text]
  • 1976AJ 81.1162L the ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL VOLUME 81, NUMBER 12 DECEMBER 1976 Far-Ultraviolet Albedo of the Moon R. L. Lucke, R. C
    81.1162L THE ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL VOLUME 81, NUMBER 12 DECEMBER 1976 Far-ultraviolet albedo of the Moon 1976AJ R. L. Lucke, R. C. Henry, and W. G. Fastie Department of Physics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218 (Received 28 May 1976; revised 21 September 1976) The albedo and photometric function of the Moon have been measured between 121.6 and 168.0 nm by comparing the brightness of the Moon, observed with an orbiting far-ultraviolet spectrometer during the Apollo 17 mission, to the solar brightness observed simultaneously from a sounding rocket. The instruments were carefully cross calibrated. In contrast to what is found in the visible and the near ultraviolet, the brightness of the Moon is found to increase toward shorter wavelengths; the Moon is “blue” in the far ultraviolet. This is confirmed by new laboratory study of lunar samples. A brief review of lunar albedo measurements in the 120-600-nm range is given. INTRODUCTION Moon’s surface is adequately described by the photo- metric functions of Hapke (1963), later modified for LUCKE, Henry, and Fastie (1973) have improved accuracy near grazing incidence (Hapke l reported in these pages laboratory measurements of 1966). Since the observations of the present experiment the far-ultraviolet reflectivity of lunar fines (dust) ob- did not come close to grazing incidence (the observation tained during the Apollo 11,12, and 14 missions. They angle was always close to 30° from the vertical), the deduced, by comparing their result with existing direct 1963 version of the photometric function is quite ade- measurements of the lunar brightness, that most pre- quate: The amount of light (e.g., in photons/sec) received viously reported far-ultraviolet lunar albedo determi- by a detector of area a from a patch of the Moon’s sur- nations had given much too low a value.
    [Show full text]