DOCSLIB.ORG

1 Soil Compaction

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1 Soil Compaction Soil Compaction: Soil Compaction: Where, How Bad, What to Do? Where, How Bad, What to Do? • What is compaction? Ken Sudduth • What causes it? Ag Engineer • What are some of the effects? USDA Agricultural Research Service • How can we measure compaction? Columbia, MO • How can we manage compaction? Soil Compaction: Where, How Bad, What to Do? What is Compaction? Compaction is simply a reduction in pore space Thanks to the following for providing some of the slides and data used in this presentation: • Dr. Randy Raper, Ag Engineer, USDA-ARS National Soil Dynamics Lab, Auburn, Alabama • Dr. Peter Motavalli, Associate Professor, Soil, Environmental, and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Missouri Composition of the Soil Volume Compaction Definitions • Bulk density (ρb) = Ms/Vt • Soil compaction – Decrease in soil volume and • Particle density porosity, or increase in soil bulk density, due to mechanical stress on soil, for example, from traffic of (ρs)= Ms/Vs agricultural machinery. Compaction can also occur • Porosity = V /V = f t naturally. 1 - (ρb/ρs) • Surface compaction – compaction that occurs in the surface “plow layer” • Subsoil compaction – compaction that occurs below the plow layer due to a surface load. 1 What Causes Compaction? Causes of Compaction • Vehicle Traffic Vehicle Traffic Vehicle Traffic 60000 50000 40000 30000 20000 Weight, lbs. Weight, 10000 0 1948 2000 Factors in Vehicle Compaction Factors in Vehicle Compaction • Weak soil • Weak soil • Moisture Content Effect • Excessive Loads • Density Effect • Size of Load at the Surface – Ground Pressure 2 Factors in Vehicle Compaction Factors in Vehicle Compaction • Weak soil • Weak soil • Excessive Loads • Excessive Loads • Severity of Load at • Severity of Load at the Surface the Surface • Impact at Depth • Impact at Depth • Repeated Loadings • For equal stress at the surface, larger tires • First pass does 80% of total compaction affect soil to a greater depth • Repeated loadings increase compaction • Vehicles have gotten larger! • Controlled traffic / Autoguidance Causes of Compaction Soil Particle Sizes • Vehicle Traffic • Clay (< 0.002 mm) • Natural Soil Reconsolidation • Silt (0.002 -0.05 mm) • Sand (0.05 - 2 mm) Basketballs, Baseballs, and Marbles Hardpan Profile Sand and Silt Sand and Silt and Clay Topsoil Hardpan Subsoil 3 Causes of Compaction What are Some Effects of Compaction? • Vehicle Traffic 100 • Natural Soil 80 Reconsolidation 60 Poorly-Graded • Well-graded soils 40 Well-Graded more susceptible to Percent Finer 20 0 natural compaction 10 0.1 0.001 than poorly- graded Particle Diameter, mm soils Effects of Compaction Effects of Compaction • Increased Soil Erosion • Increased Soil Erosion • Decreased Infiltration Effects of Compaction Effects of Compaction • Increased Soil Erosion • Increased Soil Erosion • Decreased Infiltration • Decreased Infiltration • Decreased Water Storage • Decreased Water Storage • Reduced N Uptake Subsoiled Compacted Compacted Non-compacted 4 Effects of Compaction Effects of Compaction • Increased Soil Erosion • Increased Soil Erosion • Decreased Infiltration • Decreased Infiltration • Decreased Water Storage • Decreased Water Storage • Reduced N Uptake • Reduced N Uptake • Decreased Root Growth • Decreased Root Growth • REDUCED YIELD Effects of Compaction on Yield Effects of Compaction on Yield Corn Grain Yields, 2000 12.0 Corn Grain Yields, 2000 Not compacted 12.0 Compacted Check Compacted NS Subsoil NS 9.0 9.0 Corn LSD(0.05) Corn grain yield -1 6.0 grain yield 6.0 (Mg ha ) LSD -1 (0.05) (Mg ha ) 3.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 0 3.8 7.6 12.8 061020 Turkey litter (dry Mg ha-1) Poultry litter (dry Mg ha-1) Data collected at MU Bradford Farm (Columbia) by Motavalli et al. Data collected at MU Delta Center (Portageville) by Motavalli et al. Compaction and Site-Specific Management It’s the water ! • What is most often the major • Soil and landscape factors that affect plant water cause of within- availability are often the major causes of within-field field variation in yield variability. crop productivity? • Soil water holding capacity • It’s the water! • Redistribution of water over landscapes • Ability of roots to extract water • Compaction affects all of these 5 How can we measure compaction? Measuring Compaction • Directly: • Change in soil volume • Porosity • Bulk density Measuring Compaction Measuring Compaction • Bulk density • Soil cone penetrometer • Measures the resistance of the soil to vertical • Time consuming insertion of a cone • Difficult to compare • Cone Index (CI) in units of pressure – psi across soil types or MPa • Standardized by ASABE (American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers) to allow data comparison between devices/locations • Difficult to get consistent readings with handheld, human-powered units A. Soil Bulk Density 1.00 Y = 2.6 - 4.6X + 4.4X2 - 1.4X3 Compaction 2 R = 0.84***, n = 11 Measuring Compaction 0.75 vs. Yield When BD < 1.4 Mg m-3 then Y = -0.32X + 1.32 0.50 When BD > 1.4 Mg m-3 then Sandy loam Y = -1.58X + 3.08 0.25 Loam • Soil cone penetrometer Clay loam Relative Abovegroundyield • Human-powered units with electronic data 0.00 collection are more useful, but pushing them Using Penetrometer 1.01.21.41.61.82.0 -3 into the ground at a consistent speed can still Measurements Bulk density (Mg m ) be difficult 0 B. Penetrometer resistance F1-101 1.00 20 A 0.75 40 0.50 Depth, cm Bt1 Y = 0.98 - 0.20X R2 = 0.53*, n = 11 0.25 60 Bt2 Relative Abovegroung yield C1 Data from a greenhouse 0.00 80 study by Motavalli et al. 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 01234 Penetrometer resistance (MPa) CI, MPa using different Missouri soils 6 Compaction vs. Yield Compaction vs. Yield 0 0 3 F1-101 3 F1-101 20 A 20 A 2 2 40 40 Depth, cm Depth, cm Bt1 Bt1 1 Cropping System 1 Min-Till Corn-Soybean 60 60 Bt2 Bt2 No-Till Corn-Soybean C1 C1 No-Till Corn-Soybean-Wheat 80 80 0 0 01234 01234 CI, MPa CI, MPa Standardized Soybean Yield Standardized Soybean Yield Cropping System -1 -1 Min-Till Corn-Soybean No-Till Corn-Soybean No-Till Corn-Soybean-Wheat -2 -2 10 20 30 40 1.6 2 2.4 2.8 3.2 3.6 Depth to Maximum Cone Index, cm Maximum Cone Index, MPa Measuring Compaction Within-Field Variation Site 1 Site 2 Site 3 • Soil cone penetrometer • Automated units use a power source to push them into the soil and record data simultaneously • Trailer-mounted • Tractor-mounted • Improved data collection • But still a point measurement Within-Field Variation A New Compaction Sensing Approach • Desirable characteristics for a compaction sensor • Using a penetrometer, it’s difficult to collect enough • Rapid, efficient data collection at the intensity needed for data to understand how compaction varies across spatial within-field compaction mapping (i.e. on-the-go) fields • Describe compaction profile to identify the depth of restrictive layers • Tillage draft sensors can collect surface compaction- • Repeatable, consistent measurements related data on whole fields, but don’t indicate depth • One solution: variations • Tractor-mounted shank that collects soil strength data at multiple depths 7 Soil Strength Sensors Soil Strength Sensors • USDA-ARS, Auburn, AL (Raper et al.) • University of California (Upadhyaya et al.) • On-the-go Soil Strength Sensor (OSSS) • Compaction Profile Sensor (CPS) • One sensor tip, moves up and down • Five sensor tips to 40 cm depth • University of Nebraska (Adamchuk et al.) • USDA-ARS, Columbia, MO (Sudduth et al.) • Integrated Soil Physical Properties Mapping System • Soil Strength Profile Sensor (SSPS) (ISPPMS) • Five sensor tips to 50 cm depth • Blade-based sensor, measures total force and depth trend USDA-MO SSPS – 5 extended sensing tips USDA-MO SSPS Field Test Results • Sensor worked well in field tests, showing both short- Wiring range and longer-scale tunnel variations in soil compaction 4 Prismatic tip Depth=50 cm A 20 in. 3 Depth=40 cm 2 Depth=30 cm B * A: tip extension (2 in.) Depth=20 cm Load * B: tip spacing (4 in.) MPa PSSI, 1 cell Depth=10 cm 0 Main blade 160 170 180 190 200 210 Position, m * Width is 1 in. with cover on Compaction Mapping How can we manage compaction? 10 cm 20 cm 30 cm • Avoiding Compaction • Undoing Compaction 2.2 40 cm 50 cm 2 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1 0.8 PSSI (MPa) 0.6 0.4 0.2 8 Avoiding Compaction Avoiding Compaction: Research Results • Reduced Axle Load • Assuming moist, arable soil: • Near surface • 4.4 tons/axle compacts to 12 in. • Compaction caused by specific pressure • 6.6 tons/axle compacts to 16 in. • Subsoil • 11 tons/axle compacts to 20 in. • Compaction caused by axle load • 16.5 tons/axle compacts to 24 in. and deeper • It’s common to see subsoil compaction persist for 6-7 years. Hakaansson, and Reeder, 1994 Approximate Axle Loads Avoiding Compaction Equipment Axle Load • Reduced Axle Load (ton/axle) • Minimize Tractive Element-Tire Contact 100 hp 2-wheel drive tractor 4 200 hp 2-wheel drive tractor 8 Stress (Spread the Load) 320 hp 4-wheel drive tractor 9 • Increased Tire Size 6-row combine (empty) 11 • Height 12-row combine (full) 26 • Width Single axle 27 yd3 grain cart (full) 22 • Tire Construction - Radial tires Double dual-axle 50 yd3 manure tanker (full) 35 (rear) 13 (front) Radial Tires & Proper Inflation Pressure Tractive Performance Data 18 psi 6 psi 9 Avoiding Compaction Benefits of Duals Duals Single • Reduced Axle Load • Spread the Load • Increased Tire Size • Tire Construction - Radial tires • Multiple tires Taylor et al., 1975 Avoiding Compaction Effects of Duals and Tracks on Soil Density • Reduced Axle Load 1.65 • Spread the Load 1.6 D-over • Increased
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Keynote: Soil Conservation for C Sequestration R
    This paper was not peer-reviewed. Pages 459-465. In: D.E. Stott, R.H. Mohtar and G.C. Steinhardt (eds). 2001. Sustaining the Global Farm. Selected papers from the 10th International Soil Conservation Organization Meeting held May 24-29, 1999 at Purdue University and the USDA-ARS National Soil Erosion Research Laboratory. Keynote: Soil Conservation For C Sequestration R. Lal* ABSTRACT fragile ecosystems such as the Himalyan-Tibean ecoregion, The atmospheric concentration of greenhouse gases the Andeas, the West African Sahel, East African Highlands, (GHG) is increasing at the rate of 0.5% yr-1 (3.2 Pg C and the Caribbean region (Scherr and Yadav, 1995; Scherr, -1 -1 -1 yr ) for CO2, 0.6% yr for CH4 and 0.25 ppbv yr for 1999). In addition to effects on productivity, soil erosion N2O. The global radiative forcing due to three GHGs is also profoundly impacts the environment. contributed by 20% due to agricultural activities and Two principal impacts of erosion on environment include 14% to change in land use and attendant deforestation. reduction in quality of water and air through pollution and Principal agricultural activities that contribute to eutrophication of surface water, and emissions of emission of GHGs include plowing, application of radioactively-active gases (e.g., CO2, CH4 and N2O) to the fertilizers and manures, soil drainage, biomass burning, atmosphere. Increasing atmospheric concentration of -1 -1 residue removal. The loss of soil C is accentuated by soil radioactively-active gases (0.5% yr for CO2, 0.6% yr for -1 degradation (due to erosion, compaction, salinization CH4, 0.25% yr for N2O) (IPCC, 1995) necessitates etc.) and the attendant decline in soil quality.
    [Show full text]
  • Contaminated Soil in Gardens
    Contaminated Soil in Gardens How to avoid the harmful effects EUR/ICP/LVNG 03 01 02(A) E64737 EUROPEAN HEALTH21 TARGET 11 HEALTHIER LIVING By the year 2015, people across society should have adopted healthier patterns of living (Adopted by the WHO Regional Committee for Europe at its forty-eighth session, Copenhagen, September 1998) Abstract In many cities, gardens are located on old, abandoned landfills and dumping sites. Cities have expanded by filling up spaces around the city with garbage, rubble and earth. The places where old landfills were have often become gardens where citizens can get away and enjoy the open air away from the noise and racket of cities. Normal garbage and rubble in landfills do not present a problem, however industrial and chemical waste can present a health hazard, especially when concentrations of contaminants are above acceptable limits. Some special precautions are proposed in this booklet so that the potential ill effects of contaminated soil can be avoided. Keywords SOIL POLLUTANTS RISK MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES URBAN HEALTH Contents The soil is contaminated – what then? .......................................................1 What is in the ground under us?.................................................................2 How harmful substances may affect the body ............................................3 How to reduce the risk................................................................................4 The best way to garden..............................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Agricultural Soil Compaction: Causes and Management
    October 2010 Agdex 510-1 Agricultural Soil Compaction: Causes and Management oil compaction can be a serious and unnecessary soil aggregates, which has a negative affect on soil S form of soil degradation that can result in increased aggregate structure. soil erosion and decreased crop production. Soil compaction can have a number of negative effects on Compaction of soil is the compression of soil particles into soil quality and crop production including the following: a smaller volume, which reduces the size of pore space available for air and water. Most soils are composed of • causes soil pore spaces to become smaller about 50 per cent solids (sand, silt, clay and organic • reduces water infiltration rate into soil matter) and about 50 per cent pore spaces. • decreases the rate that water will penetrate into the soil root zone and subsoil • increases the potential for surface Compaction concerns water ponding, water runoff, surface soil waterlogging and soil erosion Soil compaction can impair water Soil compaction infiltration into soil, crop emergence, • reduces the ability of a soil to hold root penetration and crop nutrient and can be a serious water and air, which are necessary for water uptake, all of which result in form of soil plant root growth and function depressed crop yield. • reduces crop emergence as a result of soil crusting Human-induced compaction of degradation. • impedes root growth and limits the agricultural soil can be the result of using volume of soil explored by roots tillage equipment during soil cultivation or result from the heavy weight of field equipment. • limits soil exploration by roots and Compacted soils can also be the result of natural soil- decreases the ability of crops to take up nutrients and forming processes.
    [Show full text]
  • Topsoil Characterization for Sustainable Land Management 1
    DRAFT FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS TOPSOIL CHARACTERIZATION FOR SUSTAINABLE LAND MANAGEMENT Land and Water Development Division Soil Resources, Management and Conservation Service Rome 1998 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This study is based upon earlier work by O.C. Spaargaren "Framework for Characterization and Classification of Topsoils in the World" (1992 unpublished) and A. Hebel "Soil Characterization and Evaluation System (SCE) with Emphasis on Topsoils and their Fertility-related Characteristics" (1994 unpublished). We would also like to acknowledge the cooperation of the University of Hohenheim, especially Dr. Gaiser and Prof. Stahr for testing the system, and various contributions, suggestions and constructive criticism received from Ms L.M. Jansen, Ms A Bot, Mr F. Nachtergaele, and last but not least, Mr M.F. Purnell. CONTENTS 1. Introduction 1 2. Topsoil Characterization Within Existing Soil Classification Systems 3 2.1 Introduction 3 2.2 Fertility Capability Classification (FCC) 3 2.3 Soil Classification Systems 3 3. Factors Influencing Topsoil Properties 7 3.1 Climate 7 3.2 Vegetation and Organic Matter 7 3.3 Topography and Physiography 8 3.4 Mineralogical Soil Constituents 9 3.5 Surface Processes 9 3.6 Biological Activity 10 3.7 Human Activity 10 4. Definition of Topsoil Properties and Modifiers 13 4.1 Texture 13 4.2 Organic Material 13 4.3 Organic Matter Status 14 4.4 Physical Features 16 4.5 Chemical Features 18 4.6 Biological Features 20 4.7 Drainage Features 21 4.8 Land Use 21 4.9 Erosion or Degradation 23 4.10 External Physical Conditions 25 4.11 Slope 26 4.12 Examples of Topsoil Characterization 26 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Soils and Soil-Forming Material Technical Information Note 04 /2017 30Th November 2017
    Soils and Soil-forming Material Technical Information Note 04 /2017 30th November 2017 Contents 1. Introduction to Soils ........................................................................................................................ 2 2. Components and Properties of Soil ................................................................................................ 7 3. Describing and Categorising soils .................................................................................................. 29 4. Policy, Regulation and Roles ......................................................................................................... 34 5. Soil Surveys, Handling and Management ..................................................................................... 40 6. Recommended Soil Specifications ................................................................................................ 42 7. References .................................................................................................................................... 52 “Upon this handful of soil our survival depends. Husband it and it will grow our food, our fuel, and our shelter and surround us with beauty. Abuse it and the soil will collapse and die, taking humanity with it.” From Vedas Sanskrit Scripture – circa 1500 BC The aim of this Technical Information Note is to assist Landscape Professionals (primarily landscape architects) when considering matters in relation to soils and soil-forming material. Soil is an essential requirement for providing
    [Show full text]
  • Addressing Pasture Compaction
    Addressing Pasture Compaction Weighing the Pros and Cons of Two Options UVM Project team: Dr. Josef Gorres, Dr. Rachel Gilker, Jennifer Colby, Bridgett Jamison Hilshey Partners: Mark Krawczyk (Keyline Vermont) and farmers Brent & Regina Beidler, Guy & Beth Choiniere, John & Rocio Clark, Lyle & Kitty Edwards, and Julie Wolcott & Stephen McCausland Writing: Josef Gorres, Rachel Gilker and Jennifer Colby • Design and Layout: Jennifer Colby • Photos: Jennifer Colby and Rachel Gilker Additional editing by Cheryl Herrick and Bridgett Jamison Hilshey Th is is dedicated to our farmer partners; may our work help you farm more productively, profi tably, and ecologically. VT Natural Resources Conservation Service UVM Center for Sustainable Agriculture http://www.vt.nrcs.usda.gov http://www.uvm.edu/sustainableagriculture UVM Plant & Soil Science Department http://pss.uvm.edu Financial support for this project and publication was provided through a VT Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Conservation Innovation Grant (CIG). We thank VT-NRCS for their eff orts to build a 2 strong natural resource foundation for Vermont’s farming systems. Introduction A few years ago, some grass-based dairy farmers came to us with the question, “You know, what we really need is a way to fi x the compaction in pastures.” We started digging for answers. Th is simple request has led us on a lively journey. We began by adapting methods to alleviate compac- tion in other climates and cropping systems. We worked with fi ve Vermont dairy farmers to apply these practices to their pastures, where other farmers could come and observe them in action. We assessed the pros and cons of these approaches and we are sharing those results and observations here.
    [Show full text]
  • Preventing Soil Compaction Preserving and Restoring Soil Fertility
    Preventing Soil Compaction Preserving and Restoring Soil Fertility Including the Classification Key for Detection and Evaluation of Harmful Soil Compaction in the Field www.umwelt.nrw.de Content Preface ............................................of the minister 2 1. Introduction ...................................................... 4 2. The importance of soil structure......................... 6 3. Causes of harmful soil compaction..................... 13 4. Effects of harmful soil compaction...................... 18 5. Detecting harmful soil compaction..................... 21 6. Preserving and improving soil structure ................ 25 7. What to do, if the soil is already compacted?...... 32 8. Final remarks.................................................... 36 Literature .............................................................. 37 4 1. Introduction Agricultural soil cultivation and harvest inevitably cause slight soil compaction. Especially detrimental is soil compaction which occurs deep in the subsoil, as this compaction cannot be reversed with normal soil cultiva- tion. Due to expected future warmer winters in Germany as a result of climate change, fewer and shorter frost periods are to be expected and with that the so-called “frost action” with its soil loosening effect will occur less frequently. This means that a natural way to loosen soil structure will be lost. Field traffic, with heavy loads on wet soils, is an especially critical contributor to severe soil compaction. With the increasing “just in time” harvest practice of farmers, this is a potential source of conflict. To address this, improved techniques to reduce soil pressure and to understand actual soil water content can be helpful. The steady increase in weight of agricultural machinery and field traffic frequency – both have increased by three- to fourfold within the last 40 years – in combina- tion with the technical ability to drive on increasingly wet soils, has led to ever greater compaction of our soils.
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study on Slope Stability Changes Caused by Earthquakes—Focusing on Gyeongju 5.8 ML EQ
    sustainability Article Case Study on Slope Stability Changes Caused by Earthquakes—Focusing on Gyeongju 5.8 ML EQ Sangki Park , Wooseok Kim *, Jonghyun Lee and Yong Baek Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology, 283, Goyang-daero, Ilsanseo-gu, Goyang-si 10223, Gyeonggi-do, Korea; [email protected] (S.P.); [email protected] (J.L.); [email protected] (Y.B.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +82-31-910-0519 Received: 16 July 2018; Accepted: 16 September 2018; Published: 27 September 2018 Abstract: Slope failure is a natural hazard occurring around the world and can lead to severe damage of properties and loss of lives. Even in stabilized slopes, changes in external loads, such as those from earthquakes, may cause slope failure and collapse, generating social impacts and, eventually causing loss of lives. In this research, the slope stability changes caused by the Gyeongju earthquake, which occurred on 12 September 2016, are numerically analyzed in a slope located in the Gyeongju area, South Korea. Slope property data, collected through an on-site survey, was used in the analysis. Additionally, slope stability changes with and without the earthquake were analyzed and compared. The analysis was performed within a peak ground acceleration (PGA) range of 0.0 (g)–2.0 (g) to identify the correlation between the slope safety factor and peak ground acceleration. The correlation between the slope safety factor and peak ground acceleration could be used as a reference for performing on-site slope stability evaluations. It also provides a reference for design and earthquake stability improvements in the slopes of road and tunnel construction projects, thus supporting the attainment of slope stability in South Korea.
    [Show full text]
  • Science Literacy Warm Up
    ecology á environmental issues ENDANGERED SOIL 20 (1) The United Nations declared 2015 The International Year of Soils. There has been a growing awareness that soil isn’t only important for healthy ecosystems, but that soil is also critical to our ability to make enough food to feed the world. Food security, which is the access that humans have to healthy food, is threatened when soil is threatened. Science Literacy Warm Up (2) The way we have been conducting intensive modern agriculture, polluting our lands and expanding urban cities has had a huge effect on the Earth’s soil for the last two centuries. These things, along with the effects of climate through contact with the forces of nature. change, have made soil endangered and has Once weathering forms the initial cracks in the increased concerns over food security. rock, the eroding actions of water, chemical reactions and living organisms (like plants) can (3) Let’s first examine the soil itself. If you start to erode and break apart the rock even think that soil is just simply dirt, then you are further. This process takes a long time causing mistaken. Dirt isn’t alive while soil is brimming topsoil to form very slowly. with life. Besides minerals, water and decomposing organic matter, soil also contains (7) Edaphology helps us study and examine thousands of species of small insects, worms, how altering our soil affects the plants grown fungi and microorganisms. A handful of soil in it. Proper soil conditions are vital for healthy contains more microorganisms than there are plant growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Slope Stabilization and Repair Solutions for Local Government Engineers
    Slope Stabilization and Repair Solutions for Local Government Engineers David Saftner, Principal Investigator Department of Civil Engineering University of Minnesota Duluth June 2017 Research Project Final Report 2017-17 • mndot.gov/research To request this document in an alternative format, such as braille or large print, call 651-366-4718 or 1- 800-657-3774 (Greater Minnesota) or email your request to [email protected]. Please request at least one week in advance. Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. 3. Recipients Accession No. MN/RC 2017-17 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Slope Stabilization and Repair Solutions for Local Government June 2017 Engineers 6. 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. David Saftner, Carlos Carranza-Torres, and Mitchell Nelson 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Project/Task/Work Unit No. Department of Civil Engineering CTS #2016011 University of Minnesota Duluth 11. Contract (C) or Grant (G) No. 1405 University Dr. (c) 99008 (wo) 190 Duluth, MN 55812 12. Sponsoring Organization Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Minnesota Local Road Research Board Final Report Minnesota Department of Transportation Research Services & Library 14. Sponsoring Agency Code 395 John Ireland Boulevard, MS 330 St. Paul, Minnesota 55155-1899 15. Supplementary Notes http:// mndot.gov/research/reports/2017/201717.pdf 16. Abstract (Limit: 250 words) The purpose of this project is to create a user-friendly guide focusing on locally maintained slopes requiring reoccurring maintenance in Minnesota. This study addresses the need to provide a consistent, logical approach to slope stabilization that is founded in geotechnical research and experience and applies to common slope failures.
    [Show full text]
  • Using Geosynthetics to Improve Road Performance
    2011-20TS Published December 2011 Using Geosynthetics to Improve Road Performance What Was the Need? To increase performance, roads are sometimes reinforced The use of geogrids in road with geosynthetic polymer materials, including geogrids foundations clearly benefits and geotextiles. Geogrids consist of polymers formed into TECHNICAL relatively rigid, gridlike configurations. They are com- pavement performance, monly placed between the subgrade and base or base potentially leading to longer SUMMARY and subbase layers of roads to add strength and stiffness and to slow deterioration. Geotextiles are polymer fabrics service lives for roads and Technical Liaison: that may also provide some reinforcement, but are used Lou Tasa, MnDOT reduced maintenance costs. primarily to: [email protected] • Facilitate filtration and water drainage through road foundation soils without the loss Administrative Liaison: of soil particles. Dan Warzala, MnDOT [email protected] • Provide separation between dissimilar base materials, improving their integrity and functioning. Principal Investigator: • Provide a stable construction platform over soft or wet soils, facilitating the movement Tim Clyne, MnDOT of equipment and the process of soil compaction. [email protected] Of several kinds of geotextiles, Type V is the most commonly used in Minnesota, primarily as a separator. Despite the relatively widespread use of geosynthetics in LRRB PROJECT COST: reconstructing paved county roads and state trunk highways as well as in constructing $30,000 new roads, their performance has not been well documented in Minnesota. Research was needed to obtain field data that would indicate whether geosynthetics extend the service lives of roads and reduce the need for maintenance.
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Garden Soils with Organic Matter, EC 1561
    EC 1561 • May 2003 $2.50 Improving Garden Soils with Organic Matter N. Bell, D.M. Sullivan, L.J. Brewer, and J. Hart This publication will help you understand the • Tomatoes and peppers get blossom-end rot, importance of soil organic matter levels to good even if fertilized with calcium. plant performance. It also contains suggestions • Water tends to pool on the soil surface and to for suitable soil amendments. Any soil, no drain slowly, or it runs off the surface. matter how compacted, can be improved by the addition of organic matter. The result will be a nnnn better environment for almost any kind of plant. What makes a productive soil? nnnn A productive soil provides physical support, water, air, and nutrients to plants and soil- What gardening problems are dwelling organisms (see “What is soil?” caused by poor soil quality? page 2). Like humans, roots and soil organisms Many problems with home vegetable gar- breathe and require sufficient air and water to dens, fruit trees, shrubs, and flower gardens are live. As a result, a good soil is not “solid”; caused not by pests, diseases, or a lack of rather, between 40 and 60 percent of the soil nutrients, but by poor soil physical conditions. volume is pores. The pores may be filled with Symptoms of poor soil quality include the water or air, making both available to plants following. (see illustration on page 3). • The soil is dried and cracked in summer. The largest pores control aeration and move- • Digging holes in the soil is difficult, whether ment of water through the soil and are largely it is wet or dry.
    [Show full text]