DOCSLIB.ORG

XSEDE: the Extreme Science and Engineering Discovery Environment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
XSEDE: the Extreme Science and Engineering Discovery Environment XSEDE: The Extreme Science and Engineering Discovery Environment Interim Project Report 8: Report Year 3, Reporting Period 3 November 1, 2018 – January 31, 2019 RY3 IPR 7 Page i XSEDE Senior Management Team (SMT) John Towns (NCSA) PI and Project Director Kelly Gaither (TACC) Co-PI and Community Engagement and Enrichment Director Philip Blood (PSC) Extended Collaborative Support Service Co-Director Bob Sinkovits (SDSC) Extended Collaborative Support Service Co-Director Greg Peterson (UT-NICS) XSEDE Operations Director David Hart (NCAR) Resource Allocations Service Director David Lifka (Cornell) XSEDE Cyberinfrastructure Integration Director Ron Payne (NCSA) Program Office Director Emre Brooks (UT-San User Advisory Committee Chair Antonio) Shawn Strande (SDSC) XD Service Providers Forum Chair Scott Wells (UT-NICS) Interim Senior Project Manager (ex officio) Lizanne Destefano Lead of External Evaluation (ex officio) Bob Chadduck Cognizant NSF Program Office (ex officio) RY3 IPR 7 Page ii Table of Contents XSEDE: The Extreme Science and Engineering Discovery Environment ...................................... i XSEDE Senior Management Team (SMT) ................................................................................................ ii List of Tables..................................................................................................................................................... vi Reading this Report ...................................................................................................................................... vii 1. Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................ 1 Strategic Goals ................................................................................................................................................. 1 Summary & Project Highlights ................................................................................................................. 4 2. Science, Engineering, & Program Highlights ................................................................................. 6 A New Way to See Stress Using Supercomputers ............................................................................. 6 Supercomputer Simulations Reveal New Insight on Sea Fog Development.......................... 8 Stopping HIV in its Tracks .......................................................................................................................... 9 Turning Animals Monogamous .............................................................................................................. 11 XSEDE Researcher Applies Supercomputing to Global Financial Markets .......................... 13 Hawai’i H2O .................................................................................................................................................... 14 Undergraduate Students Apply Advanced Computing to Combat Violence ........................ 16 XSEDE ECSS Symposium: Exploring New Levels of Complexity in ‘Hyper Glyphs’ Reveal New Insights in Visualized Data ........................................................................................................................... 17 Q&A with Roberto Camacho Barranco, XSEDE Student Ambassador .................................... 19 3. Discussion of Strategic Goals and Key Performance Indicators .......................................... 21 Deepen and Extend Use ............................................................................................................................. 21 3.1.1. Deepening Use to Existing Communities .................................................................................. 21 3.1.2. Extending Use to New Communities .......................................................................................... 22 3.1.3. Prepare the Current and Next Generation ............................................................................... 23 3.1.4. Raising Awareness ............................................................................................................................. 24 Advance the Ecosystem ............................................................................................................................. 24 3.2.1. Create an Open and Evolving e-Infrastructure ...................................................................... 24 3.2.2. Enhance the Array of Technical Expertise and Support Services .................................. 25 Sustain the Ecosystem................................................................................................................................ 25 3.3.1. Provide Reliable, Efficient, and Secure Infrastructure ........................................................ 26 3.3.2. Provide Excellent User Support ................................................................................................... 26 3.3.3. Effective and Productive Virtual Organization....................................................................... 28 3.3.4. Innovative Virtual Organization ................................................................................................... 29 4. Community Engagement & Enrichment (WBS 2.1) ................................................................... 30 CEE Director’s Office (WBS 2.1.1) ......................................................................................................... 33 RY3 IPR 7 Page iii Workforce Development (WBS 2.1.2) ................................................................................................. 33 User Engagement (WBS 2.1.3) ................................................................................................................ 34 Broadening Participation (WBS 2.1.4) ................................................................................................ 35 User Interfaces & Online Information (WBS 2.1.5) ........................................................................ 35 Campus Engagement (WBS 2.1.6) ......................................................................................................... 36 5. Extended Collaborative Support Service (WBS 2.2) ................................................................. 38 ECSS Director’s Office (WBS 2.2.1) ....................................................................................................... 40 Extended Support for Research Teams (WBS 2.2.2) ..................................................................... 40 Novel & Innovative Projects (WBS 2.2.3) ........................................................................................... 41 Extended Support for Community Codes (WBS 2.2.4) ................................................................. 41 Extended Support for Science Gateways (WBS 2.2.5) .................................................................. 42 Extended Support for Training, Education, & Outreach (WBS 2.2.6) ..................................... 42 6. XSEDE Cyberinfrastructure Integration (WBS 2.3) .................................................................. 43 XCI Director’s Office (WBS 2.3.1) .......................................................................................................... 45 Requirements Analysis & Capability Delivery (WBS 2.3.2) ........................................................ 45 Cyberinfrastructure Resource Integration (WBS 2.3.3) .............................................................. 46 7. XSEDE Operations (WBS 2.4) ............................................................................................................ 48 Operations Director’s Office (WBS 2.4.1) ........................................................................................... 49 Cybersecurity (WBS 2.4.2) ....................................................................................................................... 49 Data Transfer Services (WBS 2.4.3) ..................................................................................................... 49 XSEDE Operations Center (WBS 2.4.4) ............................................................................................... 50 System Operations Support (WBS 2.4.5) ........................................................................................... 50 8. Resource Allocation Service (WBS 2.5) ......................................................................................... 51 RAS Director’s Office (WBS 2.5.1) ......................................................................................................... 52 XSEDE Allocations Process & Policies (WBS 2.5.2) ........................................................................ 52 Allocations, Accounting, & Account Management CI (WBS 2.5.3) ........................................... 53 9. Program Office (WBS 2.6) .................................................................................................................. 55 Project Office (WBS 2.6.1) ........................................................................................................................ 57 External Relations (WBS 2.6.2) .............................................................................................................. 57 Project Management, Reporting, & Risk Management (WBS 2.6.3) ....................................... 58 Business Operations (WBS 2.6.4) .........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Numerical Studies of Magnetic Fluctuation-Induced Transport In
    DOE/ER/54687-3 UW-CPTC 05-6 Numerical Studies of Magnetohydrodynamic Activity Resulting from Inductive Transients Final Report August 15, 2002 – August 14, 2005 C. R. Sovinec University of Wisconsin-Madison Madison, WI 53706 August 2005 THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY AWARD NO. DE-FG02-02ER54687 NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by the United States Government. Neither the United States nor the United States Department of Energy, nor any of their employees, nor any of their contractors, subcontractors, or their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product or process disclosed or represents that its use would not infringe privately-owned rights. Numerical Studies of Magnetohydrodynamic Activity Resulting from Inductive Transients U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Contract DE-FG02-02ER54687 Final Report Principal Investigator: Carl Sovinec ([email protected]) Department of Engineering Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison 1500 Engineering Drive, 519 ERB Madison, WI 53706-1609 1. Executive Summary This report describes results from numerical studies of transients in magnetically confined plasmas. The work has been performed by University of Wisconsin graduate students James Reynolds and Giovanni Cone and by the Principal Investigator through support from contract DE-FG02-02ER54687, a Junior Faculty in Plasma Science award from the DOE Office of Science. Results from the computations have added significantly to our knowledge of magnetized plasma relaxation in the reversed-field pinch (RFP) and spheromak. In particular, they have distinguished relaxation activity expected in sustained configurations from transient effects that can persist over a significant fraction of the plasma discharge.
    [Show full text]
  • Alternative Pathways to Fusion Energy (Focus on Department of Energy Innovative Confinement Concepts)
    Alternative pathways to fusion energy (focus on Department of Energy Innovative Confinement Concepts) S. Woodruff May 1st 2006 GCEP Fusion Energy Workshop, Princeton, NJ Thanks for help and permission: Brown Bauer Belova Siemon Cothran Hooper Jarboe Ellis Shumlak Hassam Slough Sarff Hoffman Ji Mauel Yamada Kesner Barnes Thio Wurden 1. Motivation: cutting edge plasma science and a paradigm shift for fusion. 2. Innovative confinement concepts: a) Doubly connected b) Simply connected closed c) Simply connected open d) Theory support 3. Culture of innovation 1. Motivation: cutting edge plasma science and a paradigm shift for fusion. 2. Innovative confinement concepts: a) Doubly connected b) Simply connected closed c) Simply connected open d) Theory support 3. Culturing innovation Innovative Confinement Concepts • Cutting-edge plasma science across the nation. • Experiments offer to fundamentally change the paradigm of Fusion Energy Sciences. • Experiments aim to operate in new plasma regimes. • Premier method to train the next generation of plasma researchers (more than 100 students/year). • The US program leads the world in concept innovation. • Small-scale experiments (<1-2M/year) deliver value science. Can we fundamentally change the paradigm? Yes! Think: complexity, scale and new physics. •To first order, the total weight Total cost of the fusion core is a measure Direct cost 65% indirect cost 25% of it’s cost. Contingency 10% 100% •‘Simply connected’ may be a Direct cost virtue. Reactor 50-60% Conventional plant 35-30% Structures 15-10% Doubly: a Ro 100% structure Reactor Cost links plasma Coils 30% Torus Shield 10% Blanket Blanket 10% Simply: a Heat Transfer 15% nothing Auxilliary power 15% links plasma Other compnents 20% CT 100% Fusion development path is staged to address scientific and performance metrics.
    [Show full text]
  • Electron Density Fluctuations and Fluctuation-Induced Transport in the Reversed-Field Pinch
    ELECTRON DENSITY FLUCTUATIONS AND FLUCTUATION-INDUCED TRANSPORT IN THE REVERSED-FIELD PINCH by Nicholas E. Lanier A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Physics) at the University of Wisconsin–Madison 1999 i ELECTRON DENSITY FLUCTUATIONS AND FLUCTUATION- INDUCED TRANSPORT IN THE REVERSED-FIELD PINCH Nicholas E. Lanier Under the supervision of Professor Stewart C. Prager At the University of Wisconsin–Madison An extensive study on the origin of density fluctuations and their role in particle transport has been investigated in the Madison Symmetric Torus reversed-field pinch. The principal physics goals that motivate this work are: investigating the nature of particle transport in a stochastic field, uncovering the relationship between density fluctuations and magnetic field fluctuations arising from tearing and reconnection, identifying the mechanisms by which a single tearing mode in a stochastic medium can affect particle transport. Following are the primary physics results of this work. Measurements of the radial electron flux profiles indicate that confinement in the core is improved during pulsed poloidal current drive experiments. Correlations between density and magnetic fluctuations demonstrate that the origin of the large amplitude density fluctuations can be directly attributed to the core-resonant tearing modes, and that these fluctuations are advective in the plasma edge; however, these fluctuations appear compressional in the core, provided the nonlinear terms are small. Correlations between density and radial velocity fluctuations indicate that although the fluctuations from the core-resonant modes dominate at the edge, their relative phase is such that they do not cause transport there, consistent with the expectation that core modes do not destroy edge magnetic surfaces.
    [Show full text]
  • Electron Thermal Transport in the Madison Symmetric Torus
    ELECTRON THERMAL TRANSPORT IN THE MADISON SYMMETRIC TORUS by THEODORE MATHIAS BIEWER A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY (PHYSICS) at the UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON 2002 i Electron Thermal Transport in the Madison Symmetric Torus Theodore M. Biewer Under the supervision of Assistant Professor Cary B. Forest At the University of Wisconsin-Madison Abstract Due to diagnostic improvements and the development of the MSTFit equilibrium reconstruction code, it has become possible for the first time to accurately characterize the transport behavior of MST plasmas over the sawtooth cycle. Magnetic fluctuations in the MST reversed-field pinch, which rise sharply at the crash, play a significant role in the transport of heat and particles. The RFP configuration is a good test bed for studying magnetic fluctuation induced transport since the overlapping magnetic tearing mode islands create a large radial region in which the magnetic flux surfaces are destroyed and field lines wander stochastically. The measured electron thermal conductivity in this stochastic region agrees with Rechester-Rosenbluth like predictions from a fluctuating magnetic field. Time evolving profiles are measured to understand electron heat and particle transport in the MST. In particular, electron temperature, electron density, and current density profiles have been measured during a “Standard” plasma sawtooth cycle. The MHD activity during the sawtooth cycle is examined as an a priori, time-evolving condition that is affecting the plasma equilibrium and consequently the transport of heat and particles. The cause of the MHD behavior is not central to this thesis. Rather, the effects of the fluctuations on transport are considered.
    [Show full text]
  • Sweep System Design for a Heavy Ion Beam Probe on Madison Symmetric Torus J
    REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS VOLUME 70, NUMBER 1 JANUARY 1999 Sweep system design for a heavy ion beam probe on Madison Symmetric Torus J. Lei, T. P. Crowley, U. Shah, P. M. Schoch, K. A. Connor, and J. Schatz ECSE Department, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York 12180 ~Presented on 10 June 1998! The sweep system for the heavy ion beam probe on the Madison Symmetric Torus ~MST! is described. The two components of the system are the primary sweep optics and secondary collimation plates. Key issues in the sweep system design are the small entrance and exit ports available on MST, the significant toroidal beam motion induced by the strong poloidal magnetic field, and the excessive current loading due to plasma and ultraviolet ~UV!. The design accommodates these issues using a crossover sweep plate design in two dimensions for the primary beam as well as two dimensional sweeping on the secondary beam. The primary beam sweep design results in a sweep range of 620° in one direction and 65° in the perpendicular direction. The secondary beam sweep design results in entrance angles to the energy analyzer of ,3° in radial and ;0° in toroidal directions. The procedure for calculating sweep performance including fringe fields, a system for active trajectory control, and initial experiments on plasma and UV loading are also discussed. © 1999 American Institute of Physics. @S0034-6748~99!67001-0# I. INTRODUCTION normal. This in turn, results in a large required sweep angle range and increased exposure of the sweep plates to UV A heavy ion beam probe measures a variety of plasma radiation and plasma streaming out of the port.
    [Show full text]
  • 20081106 FESAC Debriefing-V7
    Report of the Toroidal Alternates Panel David N. Hill (Panel Chair) Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Outline Charge from Under Secretary of Science Panel membership and process Panel findings: answers to the charge – General findings – Concept specific: o ITER-era goals o High-priority issues, gaps, and initiatives o Scientific benefits Website: http://fusion.gat.com/tap Presented to FESAC: November 6, 2008 This work performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract DE-AC52-07NA27344. FESAC debriefing 11/6/08 v7 #1 Charge to FESAC From DoE Under Secretary for Science Focus on Four Toroidal Confinement Concepts – Spherical Torus, Stellarator, Reversed-Field Pinch, Compact Torus(FRC & spheromak) For those concepts that are seen to have promise for fusion energy, please identify and justify a long-term objective for each concept as a goal for the ITER era. – ITER era: when ITER operates (~ next 15-20 years) – Panel addressed all four – Iterative process with community to identify ITER-era goal – Reasonably ambitious and focused goals With that[goal] in mind, I ask that FESAC: 1 critically evaluate the goal chosen for each concept, and its merits for fusion development; 2 identify and prioritize scientific and technical questions that need to be answered to achieve the specified goal; 3 assess available means to address these questions; and 4 identify research gaps and how they may be addressed through existing or new facilities, theory and modeling/computation. Identify and prioritize the unique toroidal fusion science and technology issues that an alternate concept can address, independent of its potential as a fusion energy concept.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fairy Tale of Nuclear Fusion L
    The Fairy Tale of Nuclear Fusion L. J. Reinders The Fairy Tale of Nuclear Fusion 123 L. J. Reinders Panningen, The Netherlands ISBN 978-3-030-64343-0 ISBN 978-3-030-64344-7 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64344-7 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively licensed by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. This Springer imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature Switzerland AG The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland When you are studying any matter or considering any philosophy, ask yourself only what are the facts and what is the truth that the facts bear out.
    [Show full text]
  • 20081106 FESAC Debriefing-V7
    Report of the Toroidal Alternates Panel David N. Hill (Panel Chair) Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Outline Charge from Under Secretary of Science Panel membership and process Panel findings: answers to the charge – General findings – Concept specific: o ITER-era goals o High-priority issues, gaps, and initiatives o Scientific benefits Website: http://fusion.gat.com/tap Presented to FESAC: November 6, 2008 This work performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract DE-AC52-07NA27344. FESAC debriefing 11/6/08 v7 #1 Charge to FESAC From DoE Under Secretary for Science Focus on Four Toroidal Confinement Concepts – Spherical Torus, Stellarator, Reversed-Field Pinch, Compact Torus(FRC & spheromak) For those concepts that are seen to have promise for fusion energy, please identify and justify a long-term objective for each concept as a goal for the ITER era. – ITER era: when ITER operates (~ next 15-20 years) – Panel addressed all four – Iterative process with community to identify ITER-era goal – Reasonably ambitious and focused goals With that[goal] in mind, I ask that FESAC: 1 critically evaluate the goal chosen for each concept, and its merits for fusion development; 2 identify and prioritize scientific and technical questions that need to be answered to achieve the specified goal; 3 assess available means to address these questions; and 4 identify research gaps and how they may be addressed through existing or new facilities, theory and modeling/computation. Identify and prioritize the unique toroidal fusion science and technology issues that an alternate concept can address, independent of its potential as a fusion energy concept.
    [Show full text]
  • Collaborative Publications Laboratory for Laser Energetics
    LIST OF COLLABORATIVE PUBLICATIONS LABORATORY FOR LASER ENERGETICS 2613. B. Militzer, F. González-Cataldo, S. Zhang, H. D. Whitley, D. C. Swift, and M. Millot, “Nonideal Mixing Effects in Warm Dense Matter Studied with First- Principles Computer Simulations,” J. Chem. Phys. 153 (18), 184101 (2020). 2612. P. K. Patel, P. T. Springer, C. R. Weber, L. C. Jarrott, O. A. Hurricane, B. Bachmann, K. L. Baker, L. F. Berzak Hopkins, D. A. Callahan, D. T. Casey, C. J. Cerjan, D. S. Clark, E. L. Dewald, L. Divol, T. Döppner, J. E. Field, D. Fittinghoff, J. Gaffney, V. Geppert-Kleinrath, G. P. Grim, E. P. Hartouni, R. Hatarik, D. E. Hinkel, M. Hohenberger, K. Humbird, N. Izumi, O. S. Jones, S. F. Khan, A. L. Kritcher, M. Kruse, O. L. Landen, S. Le Pape, T. Ma, S. A. MacLaren, A. G. MacPhee, L. P. Masse, N. B. Meezan, J. L. Milovich, R. Nora, A. Pak, J. L. Peterson, J. Ralph, H. F. Robey, J. D. Salmonson, V. A. Smalyuk, B. K. Spears, C. A. Thomas, P. L. Volegov, A. Zylstra, and M. J. Edwards, “Hotspot Conditions Achieved in Inertial Confinement Fusion Experiments on the National Ignition Facility,” Phys. Plasmas 27 (5), 050901 (2020). 2611. B. M. Haines, R. C. Shah, J. M. Smidt, B. J. Albright, T. Cardenas, M. R. Douglas, C. Forrest, V. Yu. Glebov, M. A. Gunderson, C. Hamilton, K. Henderson, Y. Kim, M. N. Lee, T. J. Murphy, J. A. Oertel, R. E. Olson, B. M. Patterson, R. B. Randolph, and D. Schmidt, “The Rate of Development of Atomic Mixing and Temperature Equilibration in Inertial Confinement Fusion Implosions,” Phys.
    [Show full text]
  • Equilibrium Reconstruction in the Madison Symmetric Torus Reversed field Pinch
    INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS PUBLISHING and INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY NUCLEAR FUSION Nucl. Fusion 44 (2004) 162–171 PII: S0029-5515(04)72612-5 Equilibrium reconstruction in the Madison Symmetric Torus reversed field pinch J.K. Anderson, C.B. Forest, T.M. Biewera, J.S. Sarff and J.C. Wrightb Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA Received 21 December 2002, accepted for publication 18 November 2003 Published 17 December 2003 Online at stacks.iop.org/NF/44/162 (DOI: 10.1088/0029-5515/44/1/018) Abstract A non-linear Grad–Shafranov toroidal equilibrium reconstruction code (MSTFit) has been developed for the Madison Symmetric Torus. This is the first such code applied to the unique magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) equilibrium of the reversed field pinch. A new set of toroidal Green’s tables have been computed to impose the boundary condition of the close-fitting conducting shell. The non-linear fitting routine is sufficiently versatile for incorporating data from a variety of internal and external diagnostics, including a novel constraint based on orbits from a heavy ion beam probe diagnostic. Utilizing the full complement of internal and external magnetic and pressure diagnostics, MSTFit resolves accurately subtle changes in internal magnetic structure with implications on MHD stability. We show example equilibria that confirm conservation of magnetic helicity during relaxation and two-dimensional equilibrium effects. PACS numbers: 52.55.Hc 1. Introduction [6–8]. However, advanced internal magnetic diagnostics in the Madison Symmetric Torus (MST) RFP show a distinction An accurate determination of the magnetohydrodynamic between the experiment and these one-dimensional models.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Wisconsin - Madison February 26, 2015
    2016 American Nuclear Society Student Conference Proposal University of Wisconsin - Madison February 26, 2015 Being a Critical Member of the Nuclear Industry Presented by: American Nuclear Society Student Section University of Wisconsin-Madison Kazi Ahmed Kelsey Amundson Shyamal Anadkt Kyle Anderson Maddy Bouche Xavier Durawa AJ Gross Virginia Haupt Matthew Jasica Kalin Kiesling Jonathan King Matt Kriete Andrew Maile Amber McCarthy Drew Nigh Ryan Norval Juliana Pacheco Duarte Zz Riford Tony Silvidi Huali Wu Grant Zastrow American Nuclear Society, UW-Madison Student Section 1550 Engineering Drive Madison, WI 53706 March 1, 2015 Student Sections Committee ANS Education and Training Division Dear Members of the American Nuclear Society Student Sections Committee: The American Nuclear Society, University of Wisconsin-Madison Student Section is pleased to resubmit their proposal to host the 2016 ANS Student Conference. We believe that given the strength and experience of our student section and the improvements made on our 2015 Student Conference proposal, that the UW-Madison Student Section is qualified and prepared to host a successful and engaging student conference. The University of Wisconsin Student Section has been a very strong student section for over a decade. Dating back to the 2004 Student Conference hosted by UW-Madison, the student section has shown its strength both at the local and national level. For seven of the last ten years, the section has won the Samuel Glasstone Award for Best Section and additionally received honorable mention two other years. Over recent years our student section has become more involved in the ANS National Conferences by not only increasing our attendance at the student conferences but also increasing student participation at the winter and summer meetings as well.
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Axisymmetric Equilibrium Reconstruction for Stellarators, Reversed Field Pinches and Tokamaks
    1 TH/7-2 Non-Axisymmetric Equilibrium Reconstruction for Stellarators, Reversed Field Pinches and Tokamaks J.D. Hanson1, S.A. Lazerson2, D.T. Anderson3, M. Cianciosa1, P. Franz4, D.A. Gates2, J.H. Harris5, S.P. Hirshman5, K. Ida6, S.F. Knowlton1, L.L. Lao7, E.A. Lazarus5, L. Marrelli4, D. A. Maurer1, N. Pablant2, S. Sakakibara6, J.C. Schmitt2, A.C. Sontag5, B.A. Stevenson1, Y. Suzuki6, D. Terranova4 1Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA 2Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, Princeton, NJ, USA 3University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA 4Consorzio RFX, EURATOM-ENEA Association, Padova, Italy 5Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, USA 6National Institute for Fusion Science, Toki, Gifu, Japan 7General Atomics, San Diego, CA, USA E-mail contact of main author: [email protected] Abstract. Axisymmetric equilibrium reconstruction using MHD equilibrium solutions to the Grad-Shafranov equation has long been an important tool for interpreting tokamak experiments. This paper describes recent results in applying non-axisymmetric (3D) equilibrium reconstruction codes to nominally axisymmetric plasmas (tokamaks and reversed field pinches), and fully non-axisymmetric plasmas (stellarators). Results from applying the V3FIT code to CTH and HSX stellarator plasmas, RFX-mod reversed field pinch plasmas and DIII-D tokamak plasmas and the STELLOPT code to LHD stellarator plasmas and DIII-D tokamak plasmas are presented. 1. Introduction Determination of the experimental magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) equilibrium configuration of toroidal plasmas has become essential for understanding and optimizing stability and confinement in fusion research devices. Reconstruction of the experimental equilibrium from a combined set of magnetic, radiant and kinetic measurements is effected by minimizing the mismatch between modeled and observed signals by changing the parameters that specify the model equilibrium.
    [Show full text]