DOCSLIB.ORG

Artin M. Galois Theory (2Ed, London, 1944)(86S).Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Artin M. Galois Theory (2Ed, London, 1944)(86S).Pdf 353117 NOTRE DAME MATHEMATICAL LECTURES Number 2 GALOIS THEORY Lectures delivered at the University of Notre Dame by DR. EMIL ARTIN Professor of Mathematics, Princeton University Edited and supplemented with a Section on Applications by DR. ARTHUR N. MILGRAM Associate Professor of Mathematics, University of Minnesota Second Edition With Additions and Revisions UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME PRESS NOTRE DAME LONDON Copyright 1942, 1944 UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME Second Printing, February 1964 Third Printing, July 1965 Fourth Printing, August 1966 New composition with corrections Fifth Printing, March 1970 Sixth Printing, January 197 1 Printed in the United States of America by NAPCO Graphie Arts, Inc., Milwaukee, Wisconsin TABLE OF CONTENTS (The sections marked with an asterisk have been herein added to the content of the first edition) Page 1 LINEAR ALGEBRA .................................... 1 A. Fields........................................... 1 B. Vector Spaces .................................... 1 C. Homogeneous Linear Equations ..................... 2 D. Dependence and Independence of Vectors .. , ......... 4 E. Non-homogeneous Linear Equations ................. 9 F.* Determinants ..................................... 11 II FIELD THEORY ............................. <......... 21 A. Extension Fields ................................. 21 B. Polynomials ...................................... 22 C. Algebraic Elements ............................... 25 D. Splitting Fields ................................... 30 E. Unique Decomposition of Polynomials into Irreducible Factors ........... , .......... 33 F. Group Characters ................................. 34 G.* Applications and Examples to Theorem 13 ............ 38 H. Normal Extensions ................................ 41 Finite Fields ............................... .... 49 J. Roots of Unity ............................. .., .. 56 K. Noether Equations ................................ 57 L. Kummer’s Fields ....................... .......... 59 M. Simple Extensions ................................ 64 N. Existence of a Normal Basis ........... , ........... 66 Q. Theorem on Natural Irrationalities ................... 67 111 APPLICATIONS By A. N. Milgram., ..................... , ........... 69 A. Solvable Groups .................................. 69 B. Permutation Groups ............................... 70 C. Solution of Equations by Radicals ................... 72 D. The General Equation of Degree n. .................. 74 E. Solvable Equations of Prime Degree ................. 76 F. Ruler and Compass Construction .................... 80 1 LINEAR ALGEBRA A. Fie’lds--* A field is a set of elements in which a pair of operations called multiplication and addition is defined analogous to the operations of multipl:ication and addition in the real number system (which is itself an example of a field). In each field F there exist unique elements called o and 1 which, under the operations of addition and multiplica- tion, behave with respect to a11 the other elements of F exactly as their correspondents in the real number system. In two respects, the analogy is not complete: 1) multiplication is not assumed to be commu- tative in every field, and 2) a field may have only a finite number of elements. More exactly, a field is a set of elements which, under the above mentioned operation of addition, forms an additive abelian group and for which the elements, exclusive of zero, form a multiplicative group and, finally, in which the two group operations are connected by the distributive law. Furthermore, the product of o and any element is de- fined to be o. If multiplication in the field is commutative, then the field is called a commutative field. B. Vector Spaces. If V is an additive abelian group with elements A, B, . , F a field with elements a, b, . , and if for each a c F and A e V 2 the product aA denotes an element of V, then V is called a (left) vector space over F if the following assumptions hold: 1) a(A + B) = aA + aB 2) (a + b)A = aA + bA 3) a(bA) = (ab)A 4) 1A = A The reader may readily verify that if V is a vector space over F, then oA = 0 and a0 = 0 where o is the zero element of F and 0 that of V. For example, the first relation follows from the equations: aA = (a + o)A = aA + oA Sometimes products between elements of F and V are written in the form Aa in which case V is called a right vector space over F to distinguish it from the previous case where multiplication by field ele- ments is from the left. If, in the discussion, left and right vector spaces do not occur simultaneously, we shall simply use the term “vector space.” C. Homogeneous Linear Equations. If in a field F, aij, i = 1,2,. , m, j = 1,2, . , n are m . n ele- ments, it is frequently necessary to know conditions guaranteeing the existence of elements in F such that the following equations are satisfied: a,, xi + a,, x2 + . + alnxn = 0. (1) . * a ml~l + amzx2 + . + amnxn = 0. The reader Will recall that such equations are called linear homogeneous equations, and a set of elements, xi, x2,. , xr, of F, for which a11 the above equations are true, is called 3 a solution of the system. If not a11 of the elements xi, xg, . , xn are o the solution is called non-trivial; otherwise, it is called trivial. THEOREM 1. A system of linear homogeneous equations always has a non-trivial solution if the number of unknowns exceeds the num- ber of equations. The proof of this follows the method familiar to most high school students, namely, successive elimination of unknowns. If no equations in n > 0 variables are prescribed, then our unknowns are unrestricted and we may set them a11 = 1. We shall proceed by complete induction. Let us suppose that each system of k equations in more than k unknowns has a non-trivial solution when k < m. In the system of equations (1) we assume that n > m, and denote the expression a,ixi + . + ainxn by L,, i = 1,2,. .,m. We seek elements xi, . , x,, not a11 o such that L, = L, = . = Lm = o. If aij = o for each i and j, then any choice of xi , . , xr, Will serve as a solution. If not a11 aij are o, then we may assume that ail f o, for the order in which the equations are written or in which the unknowns are numbered has no influence on the existence or non-existence of a simultaneous solution. We cari find a non-trivial solution to our given system of equations, if and only if we cari find a non-trivial solution to the following system: L, = 0 L, - a,,a,;lL, = 0 . Lm - amia,;lL, = 0 For, if xi,. , x,, is a solution of these latter equations then, since L, = o, the second term in each of the remaining equations is o and, hence, L, = L, = . = Lm = o. Conversely, if (1) is satisfied, then the new system is clearly satisfied. The reader Will notice that the new system was set up in such a way as to “eliminate” x1 from the last m-l equations. Furthermore, if a non-trivial solution of the last m-l equations, when viewed as equations in x2, . , xn, exists then taking xi = - ai;‘( ai2xz + ar3x3 + . + alnxn) would give us a solution to the whole system. However, the last m-l equations have a solution by our inductive assumption, from which the theorem follows. Remark: If the linear homogeneous equations had been written in the form xxjaij = o, j = 1,2, . , n, the above theorem would still hold and with the same proof although with the order in which terms are written changed in a few instances. D. Dependence and Independence of Vectors. In a vector space V over a field F, the vectors A,, . , An are called dependent if there exist elements xi, . , x”, not a11 o, of F such that xiA, + x2A, + . + xnAn = 0. If the vectors A,, . ,An are not dependent, they are called independent. The dimension of a vector space V over a field F is the maximum number of independent elements in V. Thus, the dimension of V is n if there are n independent elements in V, but no set of more than n independent elements. A system A,, . , A, of elements in V is called a generating system of V if each element A of V cari be expressed 5 linearly in terms of A,, . , Am, i.e., A = Ca.A. for a suitable choice i=ll 1 ofa,, i = l,..., m,inF. THEOREM 2. In any generating system the maximum number of independent vectors is equal to the dimension of the vector space. Let A,, . , A,,, be a generating system of a vector space V of dimension n. Let r be the maximum number of independent elements in the generating system. By a suitable reordering of the generators we may as- sumek,, . , Ar independent. By the definition of dimension it follows that r -< n. For each j, A,, . , A,. A,+j are dependent, and in the relation a,A, + a,A, + ..* + arAr + a,+j A,+j = 0 expressing this, a ,+j # o, for the contrary would assert the dependence of A,, . ,Ar. Thus, A,+j = - ar+y[a,A, + a,A, + . + arAr]. It follows that A,, . , Ar is also a generating system since in the linear relation for any element of V the terms involving Ar+j, j f o, cari a11 be replaced by linear expressions in A,, . , Ar. Now, let B,, . , B, be any system of vectors in V where t > r, then there exist aij such that Bj =iglaij Ai, j = 1,2, . , t, since the Ai’ s form a generating system. If we cari show that B,, . , B, are dependent, this Will give us r -> n, and the theorem Will follow from this together with the previous inequality r <- n. Thus, we must ex- hibit the existence of a non-trivial solution out of F of the equation xiB, + x2B, + . + xrB, = 0. 6 TO this end, it Will be sufficient to choose the xi’s SO as to satisfy the linear equationsiir xj aij = o, i = 1,2,. , r, since these ex- pressions Will be the coefficients of Ai when in E x.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • License Or Copyright Restrictions May Apply to Redistribution; See Https
    License or copyright restrictions may apply to redistribution; see https://www.ams.org/journal-terms-of-use License or copyright restrictions may apply to redistribution; see https://www.ams.org/journal-terms-of-use EMIL ARTIN BY RICHARD BRAUER Emil Artin died of a heart attack on December 20, 1962 at the age of 64. His unexpected death came as a tremendous shock to all who knew him. There had not been any danger signals. It was hard to realize that a person of such strong vitality was gone, that such a great mind had been extinguished by a physical failure of the body. Artin was born in Vienna on March 3,1898. He grew up in Reichen- berg, now Tschechoslovakia, then still part of the Austrian empire. His childhood seems to have been lonely. Among the happiest periods was a school year which he spent in France. What he liked best to remember was his enveloping interest in chemistry during his high school days. In his own view, his inclination towards mathematics did not show before his sixteenth year, while earlier no trace of mathe­ matical aptitude had been apparent.1 I have often wondered what kind of experience it must have been for a high school teacher to have a student such as Artin in his class. During the first world war, he was drafted into the Austrian Army. After the war, he studied at the University of Leipzig from which he received his Ph.D. in 1921. He became "Privatdozent" at the Univer­ sity of Hamburg in 1923.
    [Show full text]
  • Emil Artin in America
    MATHEMATICAL PERSPECTIVES BULLETIN (New Series) OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 50, Number 2, April 2013, Pages 321–330 S 0273-0979(2012)01398-8 Article electronically published on December 18, 2012 CREATING A LIFE: EMIL ARTIN IN AMERICA DELLA DUMBAUGH AND JOACHIM SCHWERMER 1. Introduction In January 1933, Adolf Hitler and the Nazi party assumed control of Germany. On 7 April of that year the Nazis created the notion of “non-Aryan descent”.1 “It was only a question of time”, Richard Brauer would later describe it, “until [Emil] Artin, with his feeling for individual freedom, his sense of justice, his abhorrence of physical violence would leave Germany” [5, p. 28]. By the time Hitler issued the edict on 26 January 1937, which removed any employee married to a Jew from their position as of 1 July 1937,2 Artin had already begun to make plans to leave Germany. Artin had married his former student, Natalie Jasny, in 1929, and, since she had at least one Jewish grandparent, the Nazis classified her as Jewish. On 1 October 1937, Artin and his family arrived in America [19, p. 80]. The surprising combination of a Roman Catholic university and a celebrated American mathematician known for his gnarly personality played a critical role in Artin’s emigration to America. Solomon Lefschetz had just served as AMS president from 1935–1936 when Artin came to his attention: “A few days ago I returned from a meeting of the American Mathematical Society where as President, I was particularly well placed to know what was going on”, Lefschetz wrote to the president of Notre Dame on 12 January 1937, exactly two weeks prior to the announcement of the Hitler edict that would influence Artin directly.
    [Show full text]
  • Vector Spaces
    19 Vector Spaces Still round the corner there may wait A new road or a secret gate. J. R. R. Tolkien, The Fellowship of the Ring The art of doing mathematics consists in finding that special case which contains all the germs of generality. David Hilbert (1862–1943) Definition and Examples Abstract algebra has three basic components: groups, rings, and fields. Thus far we have covered groups and rings in some detail, and we have touched on the notion of a field. To explore fields more deeply, we need some rudiments of vector space theory that are covered in a linear alge- bra course. In this chapter, we provide a concise review of this material. Definition Vector Space A set V is said to be a vector space over a field F if V is an Abelian group under addition (denoted by 1) and, if for each a [ F and v [ V, there is an element av in V such that the following conditions hold for all a, b in F and all u, v in V. 1. a(v 1 u) 5 av 1 au 2. (a 1 b)v 5 av 1 bv 3. a(bv) 5 (ab)v 4. 1v 5 v The members of a vector space are called vectors. The members of the field are called scalars. The operation that combines a scalar a and a vector v to form the vector av is called scalar multiplication. In gen- eral, we will denote vectors by letters from the end of the alphabet, such as u, v, w, and scalars by letters from the beginning of the alpha- bet, such as a, b, c.
    [Show full text]
  • Mathematisches Forschungsinstitut Oberwolfach Emigration Of
    Mathematisches Forschungsinstitut Oberwolfach Report No. 51/2011 DOI: 10.4171/OWR/2011/51 Emigration of Mathematicians and Transmission of Mathematics: Historical Lessons and Consequences of the Third Reich Organised by June Barrow-Green, Milton-Keynes Della Fenster, Richmond Joachim Schwermer, Wien Reinhard Siegmund-Schultze, Kristiansand October 30th – November 5th, 2011 Abstract. This conference provided a focused venue to explore the intellec- tual migration of mathematicians and mathematics spurred by the Nazis and still influential today. The week of talks and discussions (both formal and informal) created a rich opportunity for the cross-fertilization of ideas among almost 50 mathematicians, historians of mathematics, general historians, and curators. Mathematics Subject Classification (2000): 01A60. Introduction by the Organisers The talks at this conference tended to fall into the two categories of lists of sources and historical arguments built from collections of sources. This combi- nation yielded an unexpected richness as new archival materials and new angles of investigation of those archival materials came together to forge a deeper un- derstanding of the migration of mathematicians and mathematics during the Nazi era. The idea of measurement, for example, emerged as a critical idea of the confer- ence. The conference called attention to and, in fact, relied on, the seemingly stan- dard approach to measuring emigration and immigration by counting emigrants and/or immigrants and their host or departing countries. Looking further than this numerical approach, however, the conference participants learned the value of measuring emigration/immigration via other less obvious forms of measurement. 2892 Oberwolfach Report 51/2011 Forms completed by individuals on religious beliefs and other personal attributes provided an interesting cartography of Italian society in the 1930s and early 1940s.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Notes on Loop Theory
    Comment.Math.Univ.Carolin. 41,2 (2000)359–370 359 Historical notes on loop theory Hala Orlik Pflugfelder Abstract. This paper deals with the origins and early history of loop theory, summarizing the period from the 1920s through the 1960s. Keywords: quasigroup theory, loop theory, history Classification: Primary 01A60; Secondary 20N05 This paper is an attempt to map, to fit together not only in a geographical and a chronological sense but also conceptually, the various areas where loop theory originated and through which it moved during the early part of its 70 years of history. 70 years is not very much compared to, say, over 300 years of differential calculus. But it is precisely because loop theory is a relatively young subject that it is often misinterpreted. Therefore, it is extremely important for us to acknowledge its distinctive origins. To give an example, when somebody asks, “What is a loop?”, the simplest way to explain is to say, “it is a group without associativity”. This is true, but it is not the whole truth. It is essential to emphasize that loop theory is not just a generalization of group theory but a discipline of its own, originating from and still moving within four basic research areas — algebra, geometry, topology, and combinatorics. Looking back on the first 50 years of loop history, one can see that every decade initiated a new and important phase in its development. These distinct periods can be summarized as follows: I. 1920s the first glimmerings of non-associativity II. 1930s the defining period (Germany) III. 1940s-60s building the basic algebraic frame and new approaches to projective geometry (United States) IV.
    [Show full text]
  • Emmy Noether, Greatest Woman Mathematician Clark Kimberling
    Emmy Noether, Greatest Woman Mathematician Clark Kimberling Mathematics Teacher, March 1982, Volume 84, Number 3, pp. 246–249. Mathematics Teacher is a publication of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). With more than 100,000 members, NCTM is the largest organization dedicated to the improvement of mathematics education and to the needs of teachers of mathematics. Founded in 1920 as a not-for-profit professional and educational association, NCTM has opened doors to vast sources of publications, products, and services to help teachers do a better job in the classroom. For more information on membership in the NCTM, call or write: NCTM Headquarters Office 1906 Association Drive Reston, Virginia 20191-9988 Phone: (703) 620-9840 Fax: (703) 476-2970 Internet: http://www.nctm.org E-mail: [email protected] Article reprinted with permission from Mathematics Teacher, copyright March 1982 by the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. All rights reserved. mmy Noether was born over one hundred years ago in the German university town of Erlangen, where her father, Max Noether, was a professor of Emathematics. At that time it was very unusual for a woman to seek a university education. In fact, a leading historian of the day wrote that talk of “surrendering our universities to the invasion of women . is a shameful display of moral weakness.”1 At the University of Erlangen, the Academic Senate in 1898 declared that the admission of women students would “overthrow all academic order.”2 In spite of all this, Emmy Noether was able to attend lectures at Erlangen in 1900 and to matriculate there officially in 1904.
    [Show full text]
  • Book Review for EMMY NOETHER – the Mother of Modern Algebra by M
    MATHEMATICS TEACHING RESEARCH JOURNAL 18 SPRING/SUMMER 2019 Vol 11 no 1-2 Book Review for EMMY NOETHER – the mother of modern algebra by M. B. W. Tent Roy Berglund City Tech, Borough of Manhattan Community College of CUNY Title: Emmy Noether Author: M. B. W. Tent Publisher: A. K. Peters, Ltd. Publication Date: 2008 Number of Pages: 177 Format: Hardcover Special Features: Glossary Price: $29.00 ISBN: 978-1-56881-430-8 Reviewed on April 26, 2019 The story of Emmy Noether is one of “little unknown girl makes good and becomes famous”. Not a lot is known about Noether’s early life growing up, but it is abundantly clear that she was blessed with strong family ties in secure circumstances. Such an environment tends to foster success for the individual, whenever one or both parents are supportive and expose the child to positive cultural and educational influences. The author chose to describe Noether’s biographical life rather than her mathematical accomplishments. In consequence Noether’s achievements are lightly mentioned, but they are presented without any mathematical details. It would be illuminating to follow Noether’s thinking through her discoveries and to track her development to mathematical maturity. Emmy’s father, Max, was a mathematics professor in the college at Erlangen. Both parents tended to channel their daughter into preparation for domestic life as a wife and mother. However, Emmy was bright child, and solved puzzles and riddles of all kinds from an early age. She continually questioned her designated role as a girl, and queried her father why she, too, should not be a mathematician, ever resisting the rote of learning French, or of a musical instrument.
    [Show full text]
  • L-Functions and Non-Abelian Class Field Theory, from Artin to Langlands
    L-functions and non-abelian class field theory, from Artin to Langlands James W. Cogdell∗ Introduction Emil Artin spent the first 15 years of his career in Hamburg. Andr´eWeil charac- terized this period of Artin's career as a \love affair with the zeta function" [77]. Claude Chevalley, in his obituary of Artin [14], pointed out that Artin's use of zeta functions was to discover exact algebraic facts as opposed to estimates or approxi- mate evaluations. In particular, it seems clear to me that during this period Artin was quite interested in using the Artin L-functions as a tool for finding a non- abelian class field theory, expressed as the desire to extend results from relative abelian extensions to general extensions of number fields. Artin introduced his L-functions attached to characters of the Galois group in 1923 in hopes of developing a non-abelian class field theory. Instead, through them he was led to formulate and prove the Artin Reciprocity Law - the crowning achievement of abelian class field theory. But Artin never lost interest in pursuing a non-abelian class field theory. At the Princeton University Bicentennial Conference on the Problems of Mathematics held in 1946 \Artin stated that `My own belief is that we know it already, though no one will believe me { that whatever can be said about non-Abelian class field theory follows from what we know now, since it depends on the behavior of the broad field over the intermediate fields { and there are sufficiently many Abelian cases.' The critical thing is learning how to pass from a prime in an intermediate field to a prime in a large field.
    [Show full text]
  • The “Wide Influence” of Leonard Eugene Dickson
    COMMUNICATION The “Wide Influence” of Leonard Eugene Dickson Della Dumbaugh and Amy Shell-Gellasch Communicated by Stephen Kennedy ABSTRACT. Saunders Mac Lane has referred to “the noteworthy student. The lives of wide influence” exerted by Leonard Dickson on the these three students combine with mathematical community through his 67 PhD students. contemporary issues in hiring and This paper considers the careers of three of these diversity in education to suggest students—A. Adrian Albert, Ko-Chuen Yang, and Mina that the time is ripe to expand our Rees—in order to give shape to our understanding of understanding of success beyond this wide influence. Somewhat surprisingly, this in- traditional measures. It seems fluence extends to contemporary issues in academia. unlikely that Leonard Dickson had an intentional diversity agenda for his research program at the Introduction University of Chicago. Yet this This paper raises the question: How do we, as a mathe- contemporary theme of diversity Leonard Dickson matical community, define and measure success? Leonard adds a new dimension to our un- produced 67 PhD Dickson produced sixty-seven PhD students over a for- derstanding of Dickson as a role students over a ty-year career and provides many examples of successful model/mentor. forty-year career. students. We explore the careers of just three of these students: A. Adrian Albert, Ko-Chuen Yang, and Mina Rees. A. Adrian Albert (1905–1972) Albert made important advances in our understanding of When Albert arrived at Chicago in 1922, the theory of algebra and promoted collaboration essential to a flour- algebras was among Dickson’s main research interests.
    [Show full text]
  • Emil Artin (1898-1962) Bulletin De La S
    BULLETIN DE LA S. M. F. CLAUDE CHEVALLEY Emil Artin (1898-1962) Bulletin de la S. M. F., tome 92 (1964), p. 1-10 <http://www.numdam.org/item?id=BSMF_1964__92__1_0> © Bulletin de la S. M. F., 1964, tous droits réservés. L’accès aux archives de la revue « Bulletin de la S. M. F. » (http: //smf.emath.fr/Publications/Bulletin/Presentation.html) implique l’accord avec les conditions générales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.org/ conditions). Toute utilisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit contenir la présente mention de copyright. Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques http://www.numdam.org/ Bull. Soc. math. France^ 92, 1964, p. i à 10. Emil ARTIN [1898-1962] ; PAR CLALDE CHEVALLEY [Paris]. Avec ARTIN disparaît l'un des mathématiciens qui ont le plus fortement marqué une époque et un style, tant par ses travaux personnels que par l'influence qu'il rayonnait autour de lui. On reconnaît à bon droit en ARTIN l'un des fondateurs de l'algèbre moderne. Pourtant, si l'on examine la liste de ses Mémoires, on n'y trouve qu'une minorité d'articles d'algèbre pure, et un grand nombre de travaux se rapportant à la théorie des nombres, à la topologie, à la théorie des fonctions, etc.; on pourrait donc être amené à douter de la valeur de l'idée commune qui fait de lui essentiellement un algébriste. Pourtant, cette idée n'est pas fausse si l'on définit, comme on le devrait, croyons- nous, le fait d'être algébriste plus comme reflétant un certain tempé- rament intellectuel que comme indiquant un sujet d'études privilégié.
    [Show full text]
  • Emil Artin Lecture Hall.”
    Emil - Artin - Lecture Ladies and Gentlemen, on behalf of the Mathematics Center Heidelberg, MATCH, and on behalf of the faculty of mathematics and computer science I would like to welcome all of you to the Emil-Artin-Lecture. The idea of this lecture series, which is organised once a year by MATCH, is to appreciate significant developments and ground breaking contributions in mathematics and to present it to a broader public interested in mathematics. Why do we call it in honour of Emil Artin? Let me say it straight away: Artin does not seem to have any special, close relationship to Heidelberg at all, it is not clear to me, whether he has ever been here! Apart from his fundamental contributions to number theory it is his way of doing and thinking about mathematics, which is a source of inspiration to us and which we consider as a impressive example. Therefore we would like to bear in remembrance Emil Artin and his work. Let me say a few words about Artin before going over to todays lecture: Emil Artin was born in 1898 in Vienna where he grew up before moving to Reichenberg (now Liberec in the Czech Republic) in 1907 where he attended the Realschule. His academic performance then was barely satisfactory and rather irregular. About his mathematical inclination at that early period he later wrote: ªMy own predilection for mathematics manifested itself only in my sixteenth year, whereas earlier there was absolutely no question of any particular aptitude for it.º But after spending a school year in France his marking improved considerably.
    [Show full text]
  • Zum Gedenken an Emil Artin (1898–1962) Hamburger Universitätsreden Neue Folge 9
    Hamburg University Press Zum Gedenken an Emil Artin (18981962) Hamburger Universitätsreden Neue Folge 9 Zum Gedenken an Emil Artin (1898–1962) Hamburger Universitätsreden Neue Folge 9 Herausgeber: Der Präsident der Universität Hamburg ZUM GEDENKEN AN EMIL ARTIN (1898–1962) Reden aus Anlass der Benennung des Hörsaals M im Hauptgebäude der Universität Hamburg in Emil Artin-Hörsaal am 26. April 2005 Herausgeber: Der Präsident der Universität Hamburg Hamburg University Press © 2006 Emil Artin (1898–1962) Seine wissenschaftlichen Ergebnisse in der Mathematik erreg- ten allgemeine Aufmerksamkeit und hatten weitreichende Kon- sequenzen für die Forschung. Der glänzende Stil seiner Vor- träge wies ihn als virtuosen Denker aus und machte ihn zum begehrten Lehrer. Als die Nationalsozialisten ihn 1937 auf- grund der „Nürnberger Gesetze“ in den Ruhestand versetzten, emigrierte er in die USA. Dort führte er seine wissenschaftli- chen Studien an den Universitäten von Notre Dame, Indiana und Princeton fort. 1958 kehrte er nach Hamburg zurück. VITA 1898 am 3. März in Wien geboren 1916 Reifezeugnis, Immatrikulation an der Universität Wien 1919 Immatrikulation an der Universität Leipzig 1921 Promotion bei Gustav Herglotz: Quadratische Kör- per im Gebiete der höheren Kongruenzen; veröffent- licht 1924 Universität Göttingen, Vorlesungen bei Richard Courant und David Hilbert Vortrag am 22.11.: Quadratische Körper über Polynom- bereichen Galois´scher Felder und ihre Zetafunktionen 1923 Habilitation an der Hamburgischen Universität: Über eine neue Art von L-Reihen 1925 Außerordentlicher Professor am Mathematischen Seminar der Hamburgischen Universität 1926 Ordentlicher Professor am Mathematischen Seminar der Hamburgischen Universität; Vorlesung „Algebra“ 1927 der Beweis des allgemeinen Reziprozitätsgesetzes er- scheint 5 1927/28 Vorlesung „Ausgewählte Kapitel der höheren Al- gebra“, Hörer u.
    [Show full text]