The Genus Scelolyperus Crotch in North America (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Galerucinae)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Genus Scelolyperus Crotch in North America (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Galerucinae) University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Insecta Mundi Florida March 1996 The genus Scelolyperus Crotch in North America (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Galerucinae) Shawn M. Clark West Virginia Department of Agriculture Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi Part of the Entomology Commons Clark, Shawn M., "The genus Scelolyperus Crotch in North America (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Galerucinae)" (1996). Insecta Mundi. 6. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Florida at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Insecta Mundi by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. INSECTA MUNDI, Vol. 10, Nos. 1-4, March - December, 1996 261 The genus Scelolyperus Crotch in North America (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Galerucinae) Shawn M. Clark Plant Industries Division West Virginia Department of Agriculture 1900 Kanawha Blvd., East Charleston, West Virginia 25305-0191 Abstraot: A key and diagnoses are provided for the North American species of Scelolypelwr Crotch. Descriptions are given for Scelolyperus pasadenae, new species &om California and Scelolyperua tetonenuis, new species &om Wyoming. Luperua morriaoni Jacoby is treated as a junior synonymof Luperus uaripes LeConte, Luperodes nigrovirescensFallis treated as a junior synonym of Luperus nigrocyaneua LeConte, and Scelolyperus chautauquua Wilcox is treated as a junior synonym of Scelolyperua liriophilua Wilcox, new synonymies. Luperus lecontii Crotchis transferred to Scelolyperua, new combination. Distributional and biological data are provided for each species. Introduction niques similar to those described by Smith (1979) In 1874, Crotch proposed the monotypic genus and Reid (1992). Scelolyperus to accommodate his new species S. tejonicus. He did not recognize that several other Genus Scelolyperus Crotch species already known at that time were congener- Scelolyperus Crotch, 1874:79 (Type: Scelolyperus tejoni- ic. Since then, several workershave addedinforma- cus Crotch, 1874, by monotypy); Horn, 1893:102; Arnett, 1962:912, 934; Wilcox, 1965:18, 19, 126. tion to this group, but it was not until 1965 that Eugalera Brancsik, 1899:103 (Type: Eugalera Reitteri Wilcox provided the critical interpretation that is Brancsik, 1899, by monotypy); Ogloblin, 1936:273; the basis of the current understanding of the group. Wilcox, 1973:461 (=Scelolyperus Crotch, 1874). Since his admirable treatment, two additional spe- cies were described by Hatch (1971). My investiga- Diagnosis. Scelolyperus belongs to the section tions have discovered two additional new species, Scelidites, a group of closely related genera in the as well as several other taxonomic changes dis- subtribe Luperina of the tribe Luperini. This sec- cussed in the treatment below. tion is usually recognizable by the presence of a In an effort to reduce the length of this paper, rectangular lobe at the apex of the male abdomen. detailed descriptions have not been included, ex- In North America, only three other groups of Gal- cept for new species. Likewise, data from material erucinae have similar lobes. The first of these, examined (at least from localities in the United Phyllobrotica (section Phyllobroticites) is unlike States where specimens are often abundant) are Scelidites in having an extremely narrow epipleu- usuallyreduced to county level distribution, months ron. The second, section Monoleptites, is unlike collected, and hosts mentioned. Previously pub- Scelidites in having a sclerotized operculum to the lishedlocality records are usually mentioned only3 aedeagal orifice and usually in having a very long they are considered authentic and if they extend basitarsus on the hind leg. The third, Pteleon (sec- distributions beyond those indicated by material tion Exosomites which may well be synonymous that I have personally examined. Most of the infor- with Scelidites), is represented in America by spe- mation in this paper has been condensed from cies with rather short antennae that reach only portions of an unpublished Ph.D. dissertation per- slightly beyond the humerus, antennomeres 2, 3, manently preserved at the Ohio State University and 4 being about equal in length. (Clark, 1987), and detailedinformation is therefore Scelolyperus has a basal bead on the pronotum not entirely inaccessible to future researchers. but lacks obvious antennal or elytral modifications Ihave given agreat dealof emphasis to the form in male. The elytra lack a conspicuous transverse of the aedeagi (a preliminary study indicated that impression at the basal third. The rectangular lobe the spermathecae were not very diagnostic). at the apex of the male abdomen is less than half as Aedeagal preparations were made following tech- long as broad. The longitudinal interantennal car- ina is well developed, and the antennal fossae are 262 Vol. 10, Nos. 1-4, March-December, 1996, INSECTA MUNDI separated by no more than twice the diameter of Key to New World Species of Scelolyperus each fossa. The eyes of most species are somewhat distant from the oralfossa, the genaebeing about as 1. Pronotum pale ................................................................ 2 long as the terminalpalpomere ofthe maxilla. This - Pronotum black, dark brown, metallic green, metallic combination of characters willdistinguish this from blue, or metallic purple ................................... 16 other New World genera of Scelidites. All known species of Scelolyperus have entirely dark (either 2(l).Length 4.7-7.0 mm .................................................... 3 - Length 3.0-4.7 mm ....................................................... 9 black or metallic) elytra. Additional discussion and a key to genera will be provided in forthcoming 3(2). Aedeagus pointed or rounded at apex, asymmetri- papers in which twonew genera are describedfrom cal (figs. 4c-d); hind tibia of male straight ..... 4 Mexico. -Aedeagus broadly truncate at apex, symmetrical (figs. Non-metallic species of Scelolyperus from the 3b, 4i-m); hind tibia of male curved or straight westernU.S.A arefrequently confusedwithPseudo- luperus longulus (LeConte), but that species has genae that are only about half as long as the 4(3).Tibiae of male with terminal spurs; length 2.9-4.7 terminal article of the maxillary palp. Metallic mm; British Columbia, California, and Arizona ............................................. torquotus (LeConte) species from western states are sometimes con- -Tibiae of male lacking terminal spurs; length 5.9-7.0 fused with various species of Phyllobrotica, but mm; California ................. flavicollis (LeConte) that genus lacks a well-developed epipleuron. In southeastern areas of the U.S.A, Scelolyperus is 5(3).Posterior tibia of male strongly curved, with a often confused with Lysathia ludoviciana (Fall), a prominent tooth on inner side at basal 113 (fig. flea beetle that has comparatively widely separated 3d); terminal abdominal tergite not produced; front coxae. terminal spurs present on middle tibiae, absent Comments. In spite of the difficulty in charac- from front and hind tibiae; length 5.0 mm; terizing this genus, the species that are included California ................................. .tejonicue Crotch - Posterior tibia without tooth ................................... 6 are rather homogeneous in form and fit well togeth- er. 6(5).Terminal abdominal tergite of male strongly pro- This is the only genus of Scelidites that has duced (fig. 3g); hind tibia of male arcuate; representatives in the Old World (Asia) aswell as in length 4.5-6.0 mm; California ............................. the Western Hemisphere. Having examined Asian .................................................. megalurus Wilcox specimens of S. altaicus (Mannerheim), I concur - Terminal abdominal tergite of male not produced ... 7 with Wilcox (1965) that this species does belong in Scelolyperus. Only one other Old World species, S. 7(6).Hind tibiae with apical spurs; inner side of hind tibia sericeus (Jacobson), is currently classified in the of male evenly pubescent, without glabrous area ............................................................................... 8 genus (Wilcox, 1973), but I have not examined - Hind tibiae of male lacking apical spurs; inner side of specimens. Perhaps several of the Old World spe- hind tibia of most males with a broad, glabrous, cies now included in Luperus or similar genera margined channel; elytra dark blue, bluish properly belong in Scelolyperus also, but I have not green, or purple; pronotum black; apical and fully investigated this possibility. My treatment of basal margins of pronotum may be dark brown this genus is restricted to those species occurring in (variation in color indicates that specimens the Western Hemisphere. They are foundin Cana- may occur with pale pronotum); length 5.5-6.0 da and the U. S.A., and in nearby areas of northern mm; California ........................ .curvipee Wilcox Mexico. 8(7). Hind tibia arcuate in male (fig. 38); ventral side of The following key is a modification of that apex of aedeagus with two long longitudinal provided by Wilcox (1965). Most species are best carinae and two short longitudinal carinae (fig. recognized by male characters, and the key will 4j); length 5.3-5.9 mm; California ....................
Recommended publications
  • Please Scroll Down for Article
    This article was downloaded by: [USDA National Agricultural Library] On: 1 October 2008 Access details: Access Details: [subscription number 790740294] Publisher Taylor & Francis Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Biocontrol Science and Technology Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~content=t713409232 A critical evaluation of host ranges of parasitoids of the subtribe Diabroticina (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Galerucinae: Luperini) using field and laboratory host records Stefan Toepfer a; Guillermo Cabrera Walsh b; Astrid Eben c; Rebeca Alvarez-Zagoya d; Tim Haye a; Feng Zhang a; Ulrich Kuhlmann a a CABI Europe-Switzerland, Delémont, Switzerland b USDA ARS South American Biocontrol Laboratory, Hurlingham, Buenos Aires, Argentina c Departamento de Ecología Funcional, Instituto de Ecología, Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico d Instituto Politécnico Nacional, CIIDR-IPN, Durango, Mexico Online Publication Date: 01 January 2008 To cite this Article Toepfer, Stefan, Cabrera Walsh, Guillermo, Eben, Astrid, Alvarez-Zagoya, Rebeca, Haye, Tim, Zhang, Feng and Kuhlmann, Ulrich(2008)'A critical evaluation of host ranges of parasitoids of the subtribe Diabroticina (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Galerucinae: Luperini) using field and laboratory host records',Biocontrol Science and Technology,18:5,483 — 504 To link to this Article: DOI: 10.1080/09583150802001742 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09583150802001742 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.informaworld.com/terms-and-conditions-of-access.pdf This article may be used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, re-distribution, re-selling, loan or sub-licensing, systematic supply or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden.
    [Show full text]
  • 27April12acquatic Plants
    International Plant Protection Convention Protecting the world’s plant resources from pests 01 2012 ENG Aquatic plants their uses and risks Implementation Review and Support System Support and Review Implementation A review of the global status of aquatic plants Aquatic plants their uses and risks A review of the global status of aquatic plants Ryan M. Wersal, Ph.D. & John D. Madsen, Ph.D. i The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of speciic companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned.All rights reserved. FAO encourages reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product. Non-commercial uses will be authorized free of charge, upon request. Reproduction for resale or other commercial purposes, including educational purposes, may incur fees. Applications for permission to reproduce or disseminate FAO copyright materials, and all queries concerning rights and licences, should be addressed by e-mail to [email protected] or to the Chief, Publishing Policy and Support Branch, Ofice of Knowledge Exchange,
    [Show full text]
  • Autographa Gamma
    1 Table of Contents Table of Contents Authors, Reviewers, Draft Log 4 Introduction to the Reference 6 Soybean Background 11 Arthropods 14 Primary Pests of Soybean (Full Pest Datasheet) 14 Adoretus sinicus ............................................................................................................. 14 Autographa gamma ....................................................................................................... 26 Chrysodeixis chalcites ................................................................................................... 36 Cydia fabivora ................................................................................................................. 49 Diabrotica speciosa ........................................................................................................ 55 Helicoverpa armigera..................................................................................................... 65 Leguminivora glycinivorella .......................................................................................... 80 Mamestra brassicae....................................................................................................... 85 Spodoptera littoralis ....................................................................................................... 94 Spodoptera litura .......................................................................................................... 106 Secondary Pests of Soybean (Truncated Pest Datasheet) 118 Adoxophyes orana ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Diabrotica Speciosa Primary Pest of Soybean Arthropods Cucurbit Beetle Beetle
    Diabrotica speciosa Primary Pest of Soybean Arthropods Cucurbit beetle Beetle Diabrotica speciosa Scientific name Diabrotica speciosa Germar Synonyms: Diabrotica amabilis, Diabrotica hexaspilota, Diabrotica simoni, Diabrotica simulans, Diabrotica vigens, and Galeruca speciosa Common names Cucurbit beetle, chrysanthemum beetle, San Antonio beetle, and South American corn rootworm Type of pest Beetle Taxonomic position Class: Insecta, Order: Coleoptera, Family: Chrysomelidae Reason for Inclusion in Manual CAPS Target: AHP Prioritized Pest List - 2010 Pest Description Diabrotica speciosa was first described by Germar in 1824, as Galeruca speciosa. Two subspecies have been described, D. speciosa vigens (Bolivia, Peru and Ecuador), and D. speciosa amabilis (Bolivia, Colombia, Venezuela and Panama). These two subspecies differ mainly in the coloring of the head and elytra (Araujo Marques, 1941; Bechyne and Bechyne, 1962). Eggs: Eggs are ovoid, about 0.74 x 0.36 mm, clear white to pale yellow. They exhibit fine reticulation that under the microscope appears like a pattern of polygonal ridges that enclose a variable number of pits (12 to 30) (Krysan, 1986). Eggs are laid in the soil near the base of a host plant in clusters, lightly agglutinated by a colorless secretion. The mandibles and anal plate of the developing larvae can be seen in mature eggs. Larvae: Defago (1991) published a detailed description of the third instar of D. speciosa. First instars are about 1.2 mm long, and mature third instars are about 8.5 mm long. They are subcylindrical; chalky white; head capsule dirty yellow to light brown, epicraneal and frontal sutures lighter, with long light-brown setae; mandibles reddish dark brown; antennae and palpi pale yellow.
    [Show full text]
  • Barcoding Chrysomelidae: a Resource for Taxonomy and Biodiversity Conservation in the Mediterranean Region
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 597:Barcoding 27–38 (2016) Chrysomelidae: a resource for taxonomy and biodiversity conservation... 27 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.597.7241 RESEARCH ARTICLE http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Barcoding Chrysomelidae: a resource for taxonomy and biodiversity conservation in the Mediterranean Region Giulia Magoga1,*, Davide Sassi2, Mauro Daccordi3, Carlo Leonardi4, Mostafa Mirzaei5, Renato Regalin6, Giuseppe Lozzia7, Matteo Montagna7,* 1 Via Ronche di Sopra 21, 31046 Oderzo, Italy 2 Centro di Entomologia Alpina–Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Celoria 2, 20133 Milano, Italy 3 Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Verona, lungadige Porta Vittoria 9, 37129 Verona, Italy 4 Museo di Storia Naturale di Milano, Corso Venezia 55, 20121 Milano, Italy 5 Department of Plant Protection, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources–University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran 6 Dipartimento di Scienze per gli Alimenti, la Nutrizione e l’Ambiente–Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Celoria 2, 20133 Milano, Italy 7 Dipartimento di Scienze Agrarie e Ambientali–Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Celoria 2, 20133 Milano, Italy Corresponding authors: Matteo Montagna ([email protected]) Academic editor: J. Santiago-Blay | Received 20 November 2015 | Accepted 30 January 2016 | Published 9 June 2016 http://zoobank.org/4D7CCA18-26C4-47B0-9239-42C5F75E5F42 Citation: Magoga G, Sassi D, Daccordi M, Leonardi C, Mirzaei M, Regalin R, Lozzia G, Montagna M (2016) Barcoding Chrysomelidae: a resource for taxonomy and biodiversity conservation in the Mediterranean Region. In: Jolivet P, Santiago-Blay J, Schmitt M (Eds) Research on Chrysomelidae 6. ZooKeys 597: 27–38. doi: 10.3897/ zookeys.597.7241 Abstract The Mediterranean Region is one of the world’s biodiversity hot-spots, which is also characterized by high level of endemism.
    [Show full text]
  • Fitting Together: Copulatory Linking in Some Neotropical Chrysomeloidea
    Fitting together: copulatory linking in some Neotropical Chrysomeloidea R. Wills Flowers1 & William G. Eberhard2 1 Center for Biological Control, Florida A&M University, Tallahassee, FL 32307 USA; [email protected] 2 Escuela de Biología, Universidad de Costa Rica, 2060 San José, Costa Rica; [email protected] Received 21-VII-2005. Corrected 12-VIII-2005. Accepted 29-III-2005. Abstract: Copulatory linking of male and female genitalic structures in 11 Neotropical species of Chrysomelidae and one species of Megalopodidae was studied by freezing and then dissecting pairs of beetles in copula. In Megalopus armatus (Megalopodidae) the male has a long endophallus with complex membranous protuberances and a terminal flagellum that probably reaches the spermatheca. In the subfamily Eumolpinae the females have telescoping ovipositors through which the male endophalli pass, reaching to or near the mouth of the spermathe- cal duct. A long thin flagellum is probably inserted into the spermathecal duct. The male endophalli are braced inside the female using various structures, including two pairs of lateral appendages and apical appendages (both lateral pairs sclerotized in Colaspis sanjoseana and only the basal pair in Brachypnoea irazuensis), a pair of membranous swellings (in Metaxyonycha amasia), and apical microspicules on the endophallus (in Xanthonia). In the subfamily Galerucinae, males of Metrioidea and Diabrotica (tribe Galerucini) have relatively short endophalli ornamented with sclerotized hooks, spines and needles. In Metrioidea elongata the long needle-like endophallic spines of the male were erected inside the female and penetrated the wall of her bursa. In the tribe Alticini, the male endophallus is very short and does not enter the female in two species, Alagoasa gemmata and Walterianella sp.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Genus and Two New Species of Luperini (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Galerucinae) from Costa Rica
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Insecta Mundi Florida December 1993 A new genus and two new species of Luperini (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Galerucinae) from Costa Rica Shawn M. Clark West Virginia Department of Agriculture, Charleston, West Virginia Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi Part of the Entomology Commons Clark, Shawn M., "A new genus and two new species of Luperini (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Galerucinae) from Costa Rica" (1993). Insecta Mundi. 387. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi/387 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Florida at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Insecta Mundi by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Vol. 7, No. 4, December, 1993 215 A new genus and two new species of Luperini (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Galerucinae) from Costa Rica Shawn M. Clark Plant Industries Division West Virginia Department of Agriculture Charleston, West Virginia 25305-0191 Abstract Inbioluperus (new genus), I. flowersi (new species), and I. costipennis (new species) are all described from Costa Rica. Introduction Inbioluperus, new genus Within the New World Galerucinae, males of the tribe Luperini may be distinguished from most ~ia~nosis.The presence of a basal bead on the other groups by the absence of prominent spurs at pronotum and the strongly metallic color distin- the base of the aedeagus. Within this tribe, the guish this genus from most other Scelidites. subtribe Luperina is characterized by the presence Metacoryna also exhibits metallic colors and a basal of a rectangular, sometimes depressed lobe at the bead, but unlike Inbioluperus, the antennae, at apex of the male abdomen, this lobe sometimes least of the males, are strongly modified with some being reduced and represented only as a strong segments being grossly enlarged.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter Dedicated to Information About the Chrysomelidae Report No
    CHRYSOMELA newsletter Dedicated to information about the Chrysomelidae Report No. 55 March 2017 ICE LEAF BEETLE SYMPOSIUM, 2016 Fig. 1. Chrysomelid colleagues at meeting, from left: Vivian Flinte, Adelita Linzmeier, Caroline Chaboo, Margarete Macedo and Vivian Sandoval (Story, page 15). LIFE WITH PACHYBRACHIS Inside This Issue 2- Editor’s page, submissions 3- 2nd European Leaf Beetle Meeting 4- Intromittant organ &spermathecal duct in Cassidinae 6- In Memoriam: Krishna K. Verma 7- Horst Kippenberg 14- Central European Leaf Beetle Meeting 11- Life with Pachybrachis 13- Ophraella communa in Italy 16- 2014 European leaf beetle symposium 17- 2016 ICE Leaf beetle symposium 18- In Memoriam: Manfred Doberl 19- In Memoriam: Walter Steinhausen 22- 2015 European leaf beetle symposium 23- E-mail list Fig. 1. Edward Riley (left), Robert Barney (center) and Shawn Clark 25- Questionnaire (right) in Dunbar Barrens, Wisconsin, USA. Story, page 11 International Date Book The Editor’s Page Chrysomela is back! 2017 Entomological Society of America Dear Chrysomelid Colleagues: November annual meeting, Denver, Colorado The absence pf Chrysomela was the usual combina- tion of too few submissions, then a flood of articles in fall 2018 European Congress of Entomology, 2016, but my mix of personal and professional changes at July, Naples, Italy the moment distracted my attention. As usual, please consider writing about your research, updates, and other 2020 International Congress of Entomology topics in leaf beetles. I encourage new members to July, Helsinki, Finland participate in the newsletter. A major development in our community was the initiation of a Facebook group, Chrysomelidae Forum, by Michael Geiser. It is popular and connections grow daily.
    [Show full text]
  • Ludwigia Grandiflora (Large-Flower Primrose-Willow) ERSS
    Large-flower Primrose-willow (Ludwigia grandiflora) Ecological Risk Screening Summary U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, May 2012 Revised, March 2018 Web Version, 2/1/2019 Photo: O. Pichard. Licensed under Creative Commons (CC-BY-SA-3.0). Available: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ludwigia_grandiflora_saint-mathurin-sur- loire_49_10082007_4.JPG. (March 2018). 1 Native Range and Status in the United States Native Range From CABI (2018): “L. grandiflora is native to the Americas, ranging from the Rio La Plata in Argentina north to the south/southeastern USA. In the USA, its range is primarily along the Atlantic coast and through the Gulf Coastal Plain (southeastern New York through Florida, westward to Texas) (McGregor et al., 1996).” From NatureServe Explorer (2018): “Global range includes two disjunct areas, one in southern Brazil, Bolivia, northeastern Argentina, Uruguay, and Paraguay (also locally in Guatemala), and the second (with relevance here) in the southeastern United States coastal plains of southern South Carolina, Georgia, northern Florida, and Louisiana, west to central Texas; and once in southwest Missouri (Zardini et al., 1991; Crow and Hellquist, 2000a).” “There is some uncertainty over the native range of Ludwigia grandiflora.” The USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (2018) website reports all occurrences in the contiguous United States are introductions. Status in the United States From NatureServe Explorer (2018): “This species has expanded rapidly in the past in the United States beyond its original early invasion into the Pacific Northwest and the American southeast. It is now found in more than 20 states with recent expansion continuing, though not as rapidly because a significant portion of its potential range has already been filled.
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) in Azerbaijan
    Turk J Zool 25 (2001) 41-52 © T†BÜTAK A Study of the Ecofaunal Complexes of the Leaf-Eating Beetles (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) in Azerbaijan Nailya MIRZOEVA Institute of Zoology, Azerbaijan Academy of Sciences, pr. 1128, kv. 504, Baku 370073-AZERBAIJAN Received: 01.10.1999 Abstract: A total of 377 leaf-eating beetle species from 69 genera and 11 subfamilies (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) were revealed in Azerbaijan, some of which are important pests of agriculture and forestry. The leaf-eating beetle distribution among different areas of Azerbaijan is presented. In the Great Caucasus 263 species are noted, in the Small Caucasus 206, in Kura - Araks lowland 174, and in Lenkoran zone 262. The distribution of the leaf-eating beetles among different sites is also described and the results of zoogeographic analysis of the leaf-eating beetle fauna are presented as well. Eleven zoogeographic groups of the leaf-eating beetles were revealed in Azerbaijan, which are not very specific. The fauna consists mainly of the common species; the number of endemic species is small. Key Words: leaf-eating beetle, larva, pest, biotope, zoogeography. AzerbaycanÕda Yaprak Bšcekleri (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) FaunasÝ †zerinde AraßtÝrmalar …zet: AzerbeycanÕda 11 altfamilyadan 69 cinse ait 377 YaprakbšceÛi (Col.: Chrysomelidae) tŸrŸ belirlenmißtir. Bu bšceklerden bazÝlarÝ tarÝm ve orman alanlarÝnda zararlÝ durumundadÝr. Bu •alÝßmada YaprakbšcekleriÕnin AzerbeycanÕÝn deÛißik bšlgelerindeki daÛÝlÝßlarÝ a•ÝklanmÝßtÝr. BŸyŸk KafkasyaÕda 263, KŸ•Ÿk KafkasyaÕda 206, KŸr-Aras ovasÝnda 174, Lenkaran BšlgesiÕnde ise 262 tŸr bulunmußtur. Bu tŸrlerin farklÝ biotoplardaki durumu ve daÛÝlÝßlarÝ ile ilgili zoocografik analizleride bu •alÝßmada yer almaktadÝr. AzerbeycanÕda belirlenen Yaprakbšcekleri 11 zoocografik grupda incelenmißtir. YapÝlan bu fauna •alÝßmasÝnda belirlenen tŸrlerin bir•oÛu yaygÝn olarak bulunan tŸrlerdir, endemik tŸr sayÝsÝ olduk•a azdÝr.
    [Show full text]
  • Folivory and Disease Occurrence on Ludwigia Hexapetala in Guntersville Reservoir, Alabama
    J. Aquat. Plant Manage. 55: 19–25 Folivory and disease occurrence on Ludwigia hexapetala in Guntersville Reservoir, Alabama NATHAN E. HARMS, JUDY F. SHEARER, AND MICHAEL J. GRODOWITZ* ABSTRACT southeastern United States, with disjunct populations in California and Oregon (Grewell et al. 2016). Invasive We report leaf feeding, disease occurrence, and associ- populations also exist outside the United States in France, ated indigenous herbivore/fungal pathogen communities Belgium, Italy, Spain, Greece, the United Kingdom, and The on the introduced wetland species Ludwigia hexapetala at Netherlands (Dandelot et al. 2005, Thouvenot et al. 2013). Guntersville Reservoir, AL. Plant populations were sam- Closely related Ludwigia are difficult to distinguish mor- pled on three dates from May to September 2014. A phologically, and conflicting diagnostic characters have complex of indigenous herbivore and fungal taxa, mostly been presented by various authors (Nesom and Kartesz known from other Ludwigia spp., resulted in peak feeding 2000). Ludwigia hexapetala is decaploid (2n ¼ 80; Zardini et al. and disease occurrence on 88% and 92% of sampled 1991), a characteristic that may contribute to relative leaves, respectively. Herbivore damage declined over the invasiveness over other Ludwigia spp. (Pandit et al. 2011, growing season from 78 to 21% of sampled leaves, and Grewell et al. 2016). disease symptom occurrence increased from 0 to 80%. Management of L. hexapetala in the United States is a Total leaf damage (percent leaf area) from both herbivory concern as the number and distribution of infestations and disease was determined by software image analyses of increase. Ludwigia hexapetala causes economic damage floating and aerial leaves and reached 14% total reduction through disruption of flood control, irrigation water in photosynthetic tissues by September 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) and New Biological Data from Rio De Janeiro, Brazil1
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 720: 5–22Chrysomelinae (2017) species and new biological data from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil... 5 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.720.13963 RESEARCH ARTICLE http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Chrysomelinae species (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) and new biological data from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil1 Vivian Flinte1, André Abejanella1, Mauro Daccordi2, Ricardo F. Monteiro1, Margarete Valverde Macedo1 1 Av. Carlos Chagas Filho, 373. CCS, IB, Laboratório de Ecologia de Insetos, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Ilha do Fundão, CEP 21941-590, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil 2 Museo Civico di Storia Naturale, Lungadige Porta Vittoria 9, 37129, Verona, Italy Corresponding author: Vivian Flinte ([email protected]) Academic editor: C. Chaboo | Received 3 July 2017 | Accepted 26 September 2017 | Published 11 December 2017 http://zoobank.org/F7F02CEC-2664-4584-A765-745A6E0CF72B Citation: Flinte V, Abejanella A, Daccordi M, Monteiro RF, Macedo MV (2017) Chrysomelinae species (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) and new biological data from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. In: Chaboo CS, Schmitt M (Eds) Research on Chrysomelidae 7. ZooKeys 720: 5–22. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.720.13963 Abstract Chrysomelinae is one of the largest subfamilies in Chrysomelidae, yet much basic information remains un- known for Neotropical species. The present study aims to compile the first regional list of Chrysomelinae for the State of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, and assemble natural history traits obtained from our fieldwork from 2005 to 2010 in Serra dos Órgãos National Park, a mountainous area of Atlantic forest. The species list was compiled from data from field work, collections, and literature, and recorded a total of 100 species, belonging to 21 gen- era in one tribe (Chrysomelini) and three subtribes: Chrysolinina (91 species), Chrysomelina (eight species) and Entomoscelina (one species).
    [Show full text]