September 25, 2018 Ana Galindo-Marrone Chief, Hatch Act
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Culture Wars' Reloaded: Trump, Anti-Political Correctness and the Right's 'Free Speech' Hypocrisy
The 'Culture Wars' Reloaded: Trump, Anti-Political Correctness and the Right's 'Free Speech' Hypocrisy Dr. Valerie Scatamburlo-D'Annibale University of Windsor, Windsor, Ontario, Canada Abstract This article explores how Donald Trump capitalized on the right's decades-long, carefully choreographed and well-financed campaign against political correctness in relation to the broader strategy of 'cultural conservatism.' It provides an historical overview of various iterations of this campaign, discusses the mainstream media's complicity in promulgating conservative talking points about higher education at the height of the 1990s 'culture wars,' examines the reconfigured anti- PC/pro-free speech crusade of recent years, its contemporary currency in the Trump era and the implications for academia and educational policy. Keywords: political correctness, culture wars, free speech, cultural conservatism, critical pedagogy Introduction More than two years after Donald Trump's ascendancy to the White House, post-mortems of the 2016 American election continue to explore the factors that propelled him to office. Some have pointed to the spread of right-wing populism in the aftermath of the 2008 global financial crisis that culminated in Brexit in Europe and Trump's victory (Kagarlitsky, 2017; Tufts & Thomas, 2017) while Fuchs (2018) lays bare the deleterious role of social media in facilitating the rise of authoritarianism in the U.S. and elsewhere. Other 69 | P a g e The 'Culture Wars' Reloaded: Trump, Anti-Political Correctness and the Right's 'Free Speech' Hypocrisy explanations refer to deep-rooted misogyny that worked against Hillary Clinton (Wilz, 2016), a backlash against Barack Obama, sedimented racism and the demonization of diversity as a public good (Major, Blodorn and Blascovich, 2016; Shafer, 2017). -
Transportation Committee Meeting Agenda
EWA NEIGHBORHOOD BOARD NO. 23 C/o NEIGHBORHOOD COMMISSION 530 SOUTH KING STREET, ROOM 406 HONOLULU, HAWAII 96813 TEL: (808) 768-3710 FAX: (808) 768-3711 INTERNET: http://www.honolulu.gov RESOLUTION IN OPPOSITION TO THE CURRENT PROPOSED ALIGNMENT OF THE KUALAKAI PARKWAY (NORTH/SOUTH ROAD) EXTENSION THROUGH THE DEBARTOLO DEVELOPMENT KA MAKANA ALII PROJECT, DUE TO ENCROACHMENT AND INTERFERENCE WITH HAWAIIAN RAILWAY SOCIETY (HRS) OPERATIONS, A NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION, THAT HAS BOUNDARIES THAT ARE REQUIRED TO BE PROTECTED UNDER THE FEDERAL (OR&L TRACKS) AND STATE (HRS) HISTORIC REGISTERS. WHEREAS, this neighborhood board, is of the opinion, that Debartolo Development, Oahu Metropolitan Policy Organization (OMPO), and the Hawaii State Department of Transportation (HiDOT) have failed to directly present a plan acceptable by the Hawaiian Railway Society and community for the extension of the Kualakai Parkway (North South road), and WHEREAS, these organizations failed to keep the Hawaii Community Development Authority’s (HCDA) Kalaeloa member(s) informed on intended routes or work, while HCDA is the primarily entity responsible for redevelopment for the Kalaeloa Community Development District, and WHEREAS, it is important that proposed projects within the district be properly vetted to ensure the goal of government transparency, adequate public discussion, and the consideration of meaningful compromise, and WHEREAS, the current proposed route could have a significant impact on Hawaiian cultural sites and historically significant sites located -
Elected Officials and Schedule
FACTSHEET OFFICE OF ELECTIONS FS104BO026 STATE OF HAWAII 23 November 2020 Elected Officials and Schedule U.S. President and Vice President Elect1 4 year term beginning noon on twentieth day of January following election Maximum of 2 terms Jurisdiction Incumbent Next Election State of Hawaii ..................................................... (D) Joseph R. Biden ............................................................... 2024 State of Hawaii ..................................................... (D) Kamala D. Harris .............................................................. 2024 U.S. Senator 6 year term beginning noon on third day of January following election Jurisdiction Incumbent Next Election State of Hawaii ..................................................... (D) Mazie K. Hirono ................................................................ 2024 State of Hawaii ..................................................... (D) Brian Schatz ..................................................................... 2022 U.S. Representative 2 year term beginning noon on third day of January following election Jurisdiction Incumbent Next Election District I ................................................................ (D) Ed Case ............................................................................ 2022 District II ............................................................... (D) Kaiali‘i Kahele ................................................................... 2022 Governor and Lieutenant Governor 4 year term beginning noon -
Trumpism on College Campuses
UC San Diego UC San Diego Previously Published Works Title Trumpism on College Campuses Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1d51s5hk Journal QUALITATIVE SOCIOLOGY, 43(2) ISSN 0162-0436 Authors Kidder, Jeffrey L Binder, Amy J Publication Date 2020-06-01 DOI 10.1007/s11133-020-09446-z Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Qualitative Sociology (2020) 43:145–163 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-020-09446-z Trumpism on College Campuses Jeffrey L. Kidder1 & Amy J. Binder 2 Published online: 1 February 2020 # Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020 Abstract In this paper, we report data from interviews with members of conservative political clubs at four flagship public universities. First, we categorize these students into three analytically distinct orientations regarding Donald Trump and his presidency (or what we call Trumpism). There are principled rejecters, true believers, and satisficed partisans. We argue that Trumpism is a disunifying symbol in our respondents’ self- narratives. Specifically, right-leaning collegians use Trumpism to draw distinctions over the appropriate meaning of conservatism. Second, we show how political clubs sort and shape orientations to Trumpism. As such, our work reveals how student-led groups can play a significant role in making different political discourses available on campuses and shaping the types of activism pursued by club members—both of which have potentially serious implications for the content and character of American democracy moving forward. Keywords Americanpolitics.Conservatism.Culture.Highereducation.Identity.Organizations Introduction Donald Trump, first as a candidate and now as the president, has been an exceptionally divisive force in American politics, even among conservatives who typically vote Republican. -
Capitol Insurrection at Center of Conservative Movement
Capitol Insurrection At Center Of Conservative Movement: At Least 43 Governors, Senators And Members Of Congress Have Ties To Groups That Planned January 6th Rally And Riots. SUMMARY: On January 6, 2021, a rally in support of overturning the results of the 2020 presidential election “turned deadly” when thousands of people stormed the U.S. Capitol at Donald Trump’s urging. Even Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell, who rarely broke with Trump, has explicitly said, “the mob was fed lies. They were provoked by the President and other powerful people.” These “other powerful people” include a vast array of conservative officials and Trump allies who perpetuated false claims of fraud in the 2020 election after enjoying critical support from the groups that fueled the Capitol riot. In fact, at least 43 current Governors or elected federal office holders have direct ties to the groups that helped plan the January 6th rally, along with at least 15 members of Donald Trump’s former administration. The links that these Trump-allied officials have to these groups are: Turning Point Action, an arm of right-wing Turning Point USA, claimed to send “80+ buses full of patriots” to the rally that led to the Capitol riot, claiming the event would be one of the most “consequential” in U.S. history. • The group spent over $1.5 million supporting Trump and his Georgia senate allies who claimed the election was fraudulent and supported efforts to overturn it. • The organization hosted Trump at an event where he claimed Democrats were trying to “rig the election,” which he said would be “the most corrupt election in the history of our country.” • At a Turning Point USA event, Rep. -
Combating Election Misinformation
COMBATING ELECTION MISINFORMATION July 30, 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................. 5 INSTRUCTORS................................................................................................................................ 6 OUTLINE ......................................................................................................................................... 8 WHY ARE WE TALKING ABOUT INFLUENCE OPERATIONS? ................................................... 10 A BIGGER SCALE IN 2020 ................................................................................................................................. 10 A TOP CONCERN OF VOTERS ......................................................................................................................... 11 SOURCES ............................................................................................................................................................... 11 KEY TERMS AND CONCEPTS ...................................................................................................... 13 INFORMATION OPERATIONS AND INFLUENCE OPERATIONS ............................................................ 13 MISINFORMATION ............................................................................................................................................. 13 DISINFORMATION ............................................................................................................................................. -
Exhibit Ee Makakilo/Kapolei/Honokai Hale Neighborhood Board No
MAKAKILO/ KAPOLEI/ HONOKAI HALE NEIGHBORHOOD BOARD NO. 34 c/o NEIGHBORHOOD COMMISSION 925 DILLINGHAM BOULEVARD, SUITE 160 HONOLULU, HAWAII 96817 TEL: (808) 768-3710 FAX: (808) 768-3711 INTERNET: http://www.honolulu.gov/nco REGULAR MEETING AGENDA WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 25, 2017 KAPOLEI HALE – CONFERENCE ROOM 1000 ULUOHIA STREET 7:00 P.M. – 9:30 P.M. MEETING POLICIES RULES OF SPEAKING: Makakilo/Kapolei/Honokai Hale Neighborhood Board No. 34 asks if anyone wishing to speak is asked to raise their hand, and when recognized by the Chair to address comments to the Chair. §2-11- 311 Order and decorum. (a) All commissioners shall promote and preserve the order and decorum of the commission’s proceedings. Let it be known that all present and future agendas items will be commented on by the public at the beginning of the meeting agenda unless otherwise decided by majority vote of the Board. Time allowances will prevail at the noted limits and anyone wanting to comment on multiple items will be allowed to do so with the same time limit allowed per issue/item when the issue/item is called. Anyone wishing to speak should sign in before the start of the meeting and will be called up in that order. All speakers are asked to be first recognized by the Chair, and address comments through the Chair. Speakers (community and Board), must keep their comments under one (1) minute (adopted December 5, 2005), and those giving reports are urged to keep their reports under three (3) minutes unless otherwise noted. Written reports, flyers, information pertinent to reports are to be handed out PRIOR to presentation/discussion. -
The Qanon Conspiracy
THE QANON CONSPIRACY: Destroying Families, Dividing Communities, Undermining Democracy THE QANON CONSPIRACY: PRESENTED BY Destroying Families, Dividing Communities, Undermining Democracy NETWORK CONTAGION RESEARCH INSTITUTE POLARIZATION AND EXTREMISM RESEARCH POWERED BY (NCRI) INNOVATION LAB (PERIL) Alex Goldenberg Brian Hughes Lead Intelligence Analyst, The Network Contagion Research Institute Caleb Cain Congressman Denver Riggleman Meili Criezis Jason Baumgartner Kesa White The Network Contagion Research Institute Cynthia Miller-Idriss Lea Marchl Alexander Reid-Ross Joel Finkelstein Director, The Network Contagion Research Institute Senior Research Fellow, Miller Center for Community Protection and Resilience, Rutgers University SPECIAL THANKS TO THE PERIL QANON ADVISORY BOARD Jaclyn Fox Sarah Hightower Douglas Rushkoff Linda Schegel THE QANON CONSPIRACY ● A CONTAGION AND IDEOLOGY REPORT FOREWORD “A lie doesn’t become truth, wrong doesn’t become right, and evil doesn’t become good just because it’s accepted by the majority.” –Booker T. Washington As a GOP Congressman, I have been uniquely positioned to experience a tumultuous two years on Capitol Hill. I voted to end the longest government shut down in history, was on the floor during impeachment, read the Mueller Report, governed during the COVID-19 pandemic, officiated a same-sex wedding (first sitting GOP congressman to do so), and eventually became the only Republican Congressman to speak out on the floor against the encroaching and insidious digital virus of conspiracy theories related to QAnon. Certainly, I can list the various theories that nest under the QAnon banner. Democrats participate in a deep state cabal as Satan worshiping pedophiles and harvesting adrenochrome from children. President-Elect Joe Biden ordered the killing of Seal Team 6. -
Partisan Platforms: Responses to Perceived Liberal Bias in Social Media
Partisan Platforms: Responses to Perceived Liberal Bias in Social Media A Research Paper submitted to the Department of Engineering and Society Presented to the Faculty of the School of Engineering and Applied Science University of Virginia • Charlottesville, Virginia In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Bachelor of Science, School of Engineering Luke Giraudeau Spring, 2021 On my honor as a University Student, I have neither given nor received unauthorized aid on this assignment as defined by the Honor Guidelines for Thesis-Related Assignments Signature __________________________________________ Date __________ Luke Giraudeau Approved __________________________________________ Date __________ Richard Jacques, Department of Engineering and Society Introduction In the United States, public opinion about tech companies’ political biases is divided along partisan lines (Vogels, Perrin, & Anderson, 2020). In the U.S. since 2018, 69 percent of Republicans claim that technology companies favor liberal views, whereas only 19 percent of Democrats say that technology companies favor the alternative view. Over 50 percent of liberals believe that perspectives are treated equally, whereas only 22 percent of conservatives feel this way. Critics who allege bias have organized to promote legislation such as the Ending Support for Internet Censorship Act (2020) as well as an executive order (Executive Order 13,925, 2020). Furthermore, conservative entrepreneurs have produced new social media platforms such as Gab and Parler that claim -
With the Right Outreach and the Right Organization, We Can Win Back The
EARLY-BIRD DISCOUNTS CONSERVATIVEAVAILABLE SUMMIT FOR 2018 WESTERN Principled Ideas from the Centennial Institute Publisher, Dr. Donald W. Sweeting Volume 10, Number 2 • February 2018 Editor, Jeff Hunt THE BATTLE FOR THE FUTURE IS ON honestly. I run into senators here and there, and I look at them OUR COLLEGE CAMPUSES and say, “I am so disappointed. What are you doing all day long?” Who else here worked, knocked on doors, and made Charlie Kirk, WCS17 phone calls so that they would repeal Obamacare? And then I have to sit here and listen to five senators who don’t have the backbone to do what they said they were going do, are you kidding me? For seven years we had to hear, “We’re going to repeal Obamacare, just give us the House.” We gave them the House. Then they said, “We need the Senate,” and we gave them the Senate. Then they said, “We need the White House.” Now they have all three chambers and we’re hearing nothing but excuses. What makes me the sickest is that the people who voted for a full repeal of Obamacare only did it because they knew Obama was going to veto it. They lied to us! They didn’t actually mean Charlie Kirk, speaking at the 2017 Western Conservative Summit. it. So excuse my candid, extemporaneous comments, but I’m just sick and tired of these people going to Washington, saying I come from Chicago, Illinois. I grew up twenty minutes down they’re going to do something, and not doing it. -
Hawaii Clean Energy Final PEIS
1 APPENDIX A 2 3 Public Notices Notices about the Draft Programmatic EIS Appendix A The following Notice of Availability appeared in the Federal Register on April 18, 2014. Hawai‘i Clean Energy Final PEIS A-1 September 2015 DOE/EIS-0459 Appendix A Hawai‘i Clean Energy Final PEIS A-2 September 2015 DOE/EIS-0459 Appendix A DOE-Hawaii placed the following advertisement in The Garden Island on May 5 and 9, 2014. Hawai‘i Clean Energy Final PEIS A-3 September 2015 DOE/EIS-0459 Appendix A DOE-Hawaii placed the following advertisement in the West Hawaii Today on May 6 and 12, 2014. Hawai‘i Clean Energy Final PEIS A-4 September 2015 DOE/EIS-0459 Appendix A DOE-Hawaii placed the following advertisement in the Hawaii Tribune Herald on May 7 and 12, 2014. Hawai‘i Clean Energy Final PEIS A-5 September 2015 DOE/EIS-0459 Appendix A DOE-Hawaii placed the following advertisement in the Maui News on May 8, 2014. Hawai‘i Clean Energy Final PEIS A-6 September 2015 DOE/EIS-0459 Appendix A DOE-Hawaii placed the following advertisement in the Maui News on May 13, 2014. Hawai‘i Clean Energy Final PEIS A-7 September 2015 DOE/EIS-0459 Appendix A DOE-Hawaii placed the following advertisement in the Maui News on May 18, 2014. Hawai‘i Clean Energy Final PEIS A-8 September 2015 DOE/EIS-0459 Appendix A DOE-Hawaii placed the following advertisement in the Molokai Dispatch on May 7 and 14, 2014. Hawai‘i Clean Energy Final PEIS A-9 September 2015 DOE/EIS-0459 Appendix A DOE-Hawai‘i placed the following advertisement in the Star-Advertiser on May 14 and 19, 2014. -
Inside a Stealth Plan for Political Influence to Fight Campus Liberalism, a Right-Wing Group Is Funneling Thousands of Dollars to Student-Government Campaigns
THE CHRONICLE OF HIGHER EDUCATION HTTP://WWW.CHRONICLE.COM/ARTICLE/INSIDE-A-STEALTH-PLAN- FOR/240008?CID=WB&UTM_SOURCE=WB&UTM_MEDIUM=EN&ELQTRACKID=A07B9E4B33404E 09847AA3B1FA45DFF5&ELQ=4577011384504BCF995CF40B0400F064&ELQAID=13827&ELQAT=1&E LQCAMPAIGNID=5761 GOVERNMENT Inside a Stealth Plan for Political Influence To fight campus liberalism, a right-wing group is funneling thousands of dollars to student-government campaigns By Michael Vasquez MAY 07, 2017 PREMIUM André Chung for The Chronicle A slate on the ballot for student government at the U. of Maryland at College Park withdrew after its outside funding — against campus rules — was discovered. For Charlie Kirk, higher education is a political battleground — a place where his "Team Right" has been losing for too long. The rising young conservative star uses his frequent Fox News appearances to blast college campuses as "islands of totalitarianism" filled with liberal students and faculty members who force their worldview upon those around them. So Mr. Kirk’s nonprofit political-advocacy group, Turning Point USA, launched a secret counteroffensive. The goal: getting young conservatives elected to student government at universities around the country. Campus-based groups of all political stripes have long encouraged their members to pursue leadership roles, and so have fraternities and sororities. What makes Turning Point unique, student leaders say, is that its outside parent organization provides critical manpower — and thousands of dollars — to help win elections. Critics say Turning Point has taken on the role of a "super PAC" for student government. Evidence of Turning Point’s influence in student elections can be found from coast to coast.