2013 Task Force to Study the Use of Mos Specialty Training As a Substitute for State Licensing Requirements

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2013 Task Force to Study the Use of Mos Specialty Training As a Substitute for State Licensing Requirements ! 2013 TASK FORCE TO STUDY THE USE OF MOS SPECIALTY TRAINING AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR STATE LICENSING REQUIREMENTS FINAL REPORT January 1, 2014 ! TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ....................................................................................................................................3 Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................5 Findings and Recommendations .................................................................................................10 Task Force Process ......................................................................................................................23 Task Force Appointees ................................................................................................................25 Endnotes .......................................................................................................................................27 Appendix A: Legislation and Executive Order .........................................................................30 Public Act No. 10-105 .......................................................................................................31 Special Act No. 13-5 ..........................................................................................................33 Executive Order No. 36 .....................................................................................................36 Appendix B: Model Legislation ..................................................................................................38 Maryland Veterans Full Employment Act of 2013 ............................................................39 Illinois Military Family Licensing Act (2012) ..................................................................56 Appendix C: National Military Credentialing Efforts .............................................................76 National Survey of Credentialing Practices .......................................................................77 Appendix D: White House Reports on Military Credentialing ..............................................86 The Fast Track to Civilian Employment ............................................................................87 Military Skills for America’s Future ................................................................................118 Appendix E: Veterans in the Connecticut Labor Market .....................................................144 Denying Credit: The Failure to Transition Troops to Civilian Employment ...................145 Appendix F: Opportunities for Streamlined Licensing in Connecticut ...............................172 Police Officer Licenses ....................................................................................................173 Security Guard Licenses ..................................................................................................179 Emergency Medical Technician (EMT) Licenses ...........................................................182 Firefighter Licenses .........................................................................................................185 Electrician Licenses .........................................................................................................190 HVAC Technician Licenses ............................................................................................193 Heavy Duty (CDL) and Bus Drivers Licenses ................................................................196 Spousal Licensing and License Tolling ...........................................................................201 Data Collection and Oversight of Veterans’ Employment ..............................................206 Crediting Military Experience in Higher Education ........................................................209 Information Dissemination and Outreach ........................................................................218 2 INTRODUCTION Veterans are a highly trained and motivated group with much to offer the state of Connecticut. When they come home from war, veterans return to Connecticut with skills, training, and experience that should satisfy the requirements for state occupational licenses. Hundreds of veterans come to the state every year ready and willing to work as emergency medical technicians (EMTs), police officers, commercial drivers, electricians, and in other jobs. At the same time, Connecticut employers report an unmet need for qualified applicants, and a number of states have recently reformed their licensing statutes and regulations to promote veterans’ employment. Our agencies have implemented important measures to grant licenses on a case-by-case basis to veterans, but unfortunately Connecticut lags behind other states in promoting employment of veterans and military spouses. Connecticut’s failure to fully credit military training and experience in its licensing and educational programs, and to recognize out-of-state licenses for military spouses, contributes to high unemployment rates for Connecticut’s veterans, impairs employment among military spouses, and burdens military families.1 Connecticut can learn from the successful programs already implemented by states such as New York, Maryland and Illinois to provide its service members and their spouses a smoother transition from military to civilian life. Channeling veterans into occupations for which they are already trained is an essential way to support military families and to promote a robust state economy. Given the progress already made in other states, military credentialing is also imperative to ensuring that Connecticut remains competitive in recruiting the most qualified veterans to live and work in the state. In recognition of these concerns, this Task Force was created to develop reforms to aid Connecticut veterans as they transition from the military to the workforce. Through the passage of Special Act No. 13-5, the General Assembly directed the Task Force to determine whether and how state licensing processes can be streamlined to better recognize prior military experience.2 The General Assembly also instructed the Task Force to consider broader ways to help veterans transition back to Connecticut. Pursuant to Act 13-5, “the purpose of the task force is to aid veterans in securing employment.”3 Four months after the Task Force was created, Governor Dannel P. Malloy issued Executive Order No. 36, which directed “all state departments that issue certifications and licenses to conduct a thorough review of policies and procedures and make such revisions as are necessary to ensure that relevant military education, skills and training are given appropriate recognition in the certification and licensing process.” 4 Executive Order No. 36 also required state agencies to “[i]dentify any state and federal laws or regulations that pose potential barriers” to that process.5 Finally, the Executive Order mandated that “public institutions of higher 3 education should consider the unique knowledge and experience of military service as they evaluate and award academic credit” toward degrees and certifications.6 With these goals in mind, the Task Force convened on September 16, 2013 and began its research and evaluation process. In addition to analyzing present agency licensing practices and trends in the state labor market, the Task Force conducted a national survey of military credentialing initiatives and produced detailed studies of the occupations most relevant to Connecticut veterans. The Task Force also examined model legislation and executive initiatives from other states and sought feedback from state agencies, as well as advocates, researchers, and union representatives. The Task Force’s research, findings, and recommendations are contained in this report. 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Veterans face significant challenges when they leave the military and look for civilian work. The transition from war into the domestic workforce can be difficult for former service members, whose military training does not always translate smoothly into jobs at home.7 When they return to Connecticut, veterans are often required to repeat technical training they received in the military in order to receive state occupational licenses.8 Confronted with prospect of redundant, time-consuming, and expensive training programs, some veterans accept lower- paying jobs for which they are overqualified.9 Connecticut employers report an urgent need for highly skilled and motivated workers,10 and other states, including New York, Maryland, and Illinois, have implemented more aggressive programs to credit military training and experience in civilian licensing regimes. Other states have also outpaced Connecticut in encouraging veterans to pursue post-secondary education by awarding academic credit for military experience. Finally, Connecticut lags behind states such as Illinois in the effort to streamline licenses for military spouses, who often struggle to find employment when they move with their families across state lines. Connecticut owes it to its veterans to fix these problems. Veterans enter the workforce with highly developed technical skills and with experience working in groups, under stress, and for a purpose larger than themselves. Connecticut has an opportunity—and a duty to those who have served—to harness this experience for the benefit of its citizens and its economy. To attract skilled veterans to the workforce, Connecticut’s
Recommended publications
  • The Affordability of Overall Shelter Costs, It Creates Significant Business Risks for the State’S Utilities As Well;
    HOME ENERGY AFFORDABILITY GAP: 2011 Connecticut Legislative Districts Prepared for: Operation Fuel Bloomfield, Connecticut Pat Wrice, Executive Director Prepared by: Roger D. Colton Fisher, Sheehan & Colton Public Finance and General Economics Belmont, Massachusetts December 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents………………………………………………………….. i Table of Tables…………………………………………………….……… iii The Home Energy Affordability Gap in Connecticut……………………... 1 Home Energy Affordability Gap Reaches into Moderate Income……....... 3 Home Energy Burdens…………………………………………………….. 5 Federal LIHEAP Coverage……………………………………………....... 6 Basic Family Needs Budgets……………………………………………… 7 What Contributes to the Inability to Meet Basic Needs Budget………… 10 Overall Median Income………………………………………………… 10 Mean Income by Poverty Level………………………………………… 10 The Particular Needs of the Working Poor…………………………….. 11 Impact of Energy Prices on Total Shelter Costs…………………………... 13 The Consequences of Home Energy Unaffordability in 14 Connecticut………………………………………………………………... The “Social Problems” of Home Energy Unaffordability………………. 15 Public Health Implications……………………………………………. 15 Nutrition Implications…………………………………………………. 17 Public Safety Implications…………………………………………….. 19 The Competitiveness of Business and Industry……………………….. 20 Connecticut Home Energy Affordability Gap: 2011 Page i Summary………………………………………………………………. 22 The “Business Problems” of Home Energy Unaffordability……………. 22 Home Energy Burdens and Utility Bill Payment Problems…………... 23 Utility Bill Payment Problems………………………………………..
    [Show full text]
  • 2011- 2012 Legislative Guide
    ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The Joint Committee on Legislative Management wishes to thank Information Technology employee Robert Caroti for the cover photograph of the State Capitol taken from the Travelers’ tower. Many thanks Bob. LEADERS OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY SENATE President Pro Tempore, Donald E. Williams, Jr. Majority Leader, Martin M. Looney Chief Deputy President Pro Tempore and Federal Relations Liaison, Joseph J. Crisco Jr. Deputy President Pro Tempore, Eric D. Coleman Deputy President Pro Tempore, Eileen M. Daily Deputy President Pro Tempore, Toni N. Harp Deputy President Pro Tempore, Gary LeBeau Deputy Majority Leader, Edwin A. Gomes Deputy Majority Leader, John W. Fonfara Deputy Majority Leader, Andrew Maynard Deputy Majority Leader, Andrea L. Stillman Assistant President Pro Tempore, Joan Hartley Assistant President Pro Tempore, Edith G. Prague Assistant Majority Leader, Bob Duff Assistant Majority Leader, Edward Meyer Assistant Majority Leader, Gayle Slossberg Majority Whip, Paul Doyle Majority Whip, Anthony Musto Senate Minority Leader, John McKinney Senate Minority Leader Pro Tempore, Leonard Fasano Deputy Senate Minority Leader Pro Tempore/Minority Caucus Chairman Andrew Roraback Chief Deputy Minority Leader, Tony Guglielmo Chief Deputy Minority Leader, John Kissel Deputy Minority Leader, Antonietta “Toni” Boucher Deputy Minority Leader, Robert Kane Deputy Minority Leader, Kevin Witkos Assistant Minority Leader, L. Scott Frantz Assistant Minority Leader, Michael McLachlan Minority Whip, Kevin Kelly Minority Whip, Jason Welch LEADERS OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Speaker of the House, Christopher G. Donovan Majority Leader, J. Brendan Sharkey Deputy Speaker of the House, Emil “Buddy” Altobello Deputy Speaker of the House, Joe Aresimowicz Deputy Speaker of the House, Robert Godfrey Deputy Speaker of the House, Marie Lopez Kirkley-Bey Deputy Speaker of the House, Linda Orange Deputy Speaker of the House, Kevin Ryan Assistant Deputy Speaker of the House, Louis Esposito Jr.
    [Show full text]
  • Affordable Housing Grant Announced
    Vol. VIII, No. 31 Complimentary (860) 928-1818/e-mail: [email protected] Friday, April 26, 2013 THIS WEEK’S Affordable housing QUOTE “To win without grant announced risk is to triumph without glory.” STATE TO FUND $1.5M Pierre Corneille EXPANSION AT MAPLE COURTS BY MERYL E. WILLETT construction would help the VILLAGER STAFF WRITER Authority to raise its rev- KILLINGLY — Additional enue. affordable housing options “It is difficult to put money INSIDE are to become available to aside in reserve substantial senior citizens all over north- enough to meet the cost of A8 — OPINION eastern Connecticut due to a repairs and replacements. grant from the state. The buildings are more than A12 — SPORTS The Legislature announced 20 years old, and as the other B1 — CALENDAR last week that Maple Courts apartments get older there II, in Killingly, would be the are more repairs that need to B2-3— OBITS recipient of a $1.5 million be done,” said Greene. B3 — LEGALS Courtesy photos grant that will fund the con- An additional six apart- ments are expected to help Sara Hunt at the finish line the day before the Boston Marathon. struction of six additional B4 — CLASSIFIEDS housing options that will be generate additional revenue, offered in 2014. while offsetting some of the Senate President Pro repairs. Green reasoned that LOCAL Tempore Donald E. Williams, the new spaces wouldn’t need ‘It was total chaos’ D-Brooklyn, reported on the repairs immediately and the eve of the State Bond Authority could start saving Commission’s vote to help some money.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Table of Contents Transmittal Letter from the City Manager........................................................ 3 A Message from the Mayor.............................................................................. 4 Editor’s Note on Format and Structure............................................................. 5 Demographic Summary.................................................................................... 6 Telephone Directory......................................................................................... 7 Taxes, Finances, Investment............................................................................. 8 Assessment Office Finance Department Office of the Treasurer Education........................................................................................................ 14 Board of Education Norwich Free Academy (NFA) Integrated Day Charter School Otis Library Three Rivers Community College Public Safety................................................................................................... 24 Police Department Central Fire Department Taftville Volunteer Fire Department Laurel Hill Volunteer Fire Department Occum Volunteer Fire Department East Great Plains Volunteer Fire Department Yantic Volunteer Fire Department Office of Emergency Management Economic and Community Development....................................................... 42 Department of Community Development Department of Planning and Neighborhood Services Norwich Community Development Corporation Main Street Program (Rose
    [Show full text]
  • Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut
    This list is a comprehensive list of state legislators who are members of ALEC (American Legislative Exchange Council). There are 1192 Republicans, 61 Democrats, 11 Non-Partisans (NE) members. There have been 45 members who have left ALEC in the last month; 11 Republicans, 32 Democrats, 2 Non-Partisans (NE) (Corporate Campaign). There have been 108 ALEC Legislators who have either lost or given up their seats. These are the people who are carrying out the extreme right -wing agenda in the states. They go to all expense paid ALEC meetings where they get treated to lavish accommodations, meals and entertainment for the small price of destroying our democracy. They target minorities, workers, women and democratically elected city and school board members. They push privatization as the answer when it has been proven that it is less efficient and more costly. The Kochs were funding the reintroduction of segregation into a school district in NC. Alabama Louisiana Ohio Alaska Maine Oklahoma Arizona Maryland Oregon Arkansas Massachusetts Pennsylvania California Michigan Rhode_Island Colorado Minnesota South_Carolina Connecticut Mississippi South_Dakota Delaware Missouri Tennessee Florida Montana Texas Georgia Nebraska Utah Hawaii Nevada Vermont Idaho New_Hampshire Virginia Illinois New_Jersey Washington Indiana New_Mexico West_Virginia Iowa New_York Wisconsin Kansas North_Carolina Wyoming Kentucky North_Dakota Alabama ALEC Legislators Rep. Karen Fann (R-1) Pres.P.Tem.S.Tenney Allen (R-5) House of Representatives Rep. Eddie Farnsworth (R-22) Rep. Richard Miranda (D-13) Rep. Jim Carns (R-48) Rep. John Fillmore (R-23) Former ALEC Legislators Rep. Victor Gaston (R-100) Rep. Thomas Forese (R-21) Sen. Russell Pearce Rep.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement of Vote
    STATE OF CONNECTICUT SECRETARY OF THE STATE STATEMENT OF VOTE GENERAL ELECTION NOVEMBER 6, 2012 TABULATED FROM RETURNS AS RECORDED BY THE MODERATORS AND FILED WITH THE OFFICE OF SECRETARY OF THE STATE PRINTED IN COMPLIANCE WITH STATUTE HARTFORD Prepared and Paid for by the SECRETARY OF THE STATE Denise Merrill Secretary of the State ED-512-12 TABLE OF CONTENTS _________________ Party Designations ................................................................................... 4 2012 Connecticut Candidates for Electors of President & Vice President of the United States ..................................... 5 Vote for Presidential Electors (President & Vice President of the United States) ................................... 6- 20 Vote for United States Senator ................................................................ 21 - 36 Vote for Representatives in Congress ...................................................... 37 - 49 Vote for State Senators ............................................................................ 50 - 74 Vote for State Representatives ................................................................. 75 - 160 Election Day Registration, Turnout And Absentee Ballot Statistics ................................................................ 161 - 165 Board of Canvassers’ Certifications ........................................................ 166 - 172 PARTY DESIGNATIONS ____________ Major Parties Republican Democratic Minor Parties for Certain Offices Christian Center Green Independent Libertarian We The
    [Show full text]
  • President Obama Comes to Campus
    The Magazine of The UniversiTy of harTford spring 2013 President Obama Comes to Campus c1-c4obsv_spr13.indd 2 6/18/13 11:56 PM What’sHappening Summer/Fall 2013 Here is just a sampling of the exciting events coming up Visit hartford.edu/calendar regularly for details and on and off campus this summer and fall at the University the latest updates to our full calendar of events. Or of Hartford. Plan now to treat yourself to one. go to https://www.anchoronline.org/events for the latest alumni programs and events in your area. ALL-CAMPUS EVENT Tues., Aug. 6 Sun., Oct. 27 Hausmann Quartet Faculty Recital Series Fri.–Sun., Oct. 18–20 Millard Auditorium David Westfall, piano, 6 p.m. Hawktober Weekend and Robert Barefield, baritone Annual Homecoming and Millard Auditorium Parents Weekend celebration Thurs., Sept. 12 3 p.m. Featuring a comedy performance by Lions Gate Trio Admission: No charge Paula Poundstone of NPR’s Wait Wait… Millard Auditorium Kareem Lewis ’16 (left) and Sheila Huggins ’14 Don’t Tell Me! 7:30 p.m. Fri., Nov. 1 (right) perform The Winged by choreographer Admission: No charge José Limón in “Hartt Dances” in April 2013. Hartt Chamber Winds ATHLETICS Thurs., Oct. 3 Millard Auditorium Check hartfordhawks.com 7:30 p.m. Fri.–Sun., Nov. 22–24 The Richard P. Garmany for our fall game schedules. Admission: No charge Hartt Dances Chamber Music Series Lincoln Theater Fri., Oct. 18 Jaime Laredo, violin, Fri., Nov. 8 Fri.–Sat., 7:30 p.m. Men’s Basketball Draft Night and Joseph Kalichstein, piano Hartt Sinfonia and Philharmonia Sun., 2 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Legislator Database
    dist office code district number designator code first name middle initial last name 1 H 1st N Matthew Ritter 2 H 2nd N Dan Carter 3 H 3rd R Minnie Gonzalez 4 H 4th R Kelvin Roldan 5 H 5th R Marie Lopez Kirkley-Bey 6 H 6th R Hector L. Robles 7 H 7th R Douglas McCrory 8 H 8th N Tim J. Ackert 9 H 9th R Jason Rojas 10 H 10th R Henry J. Genga 11 H 11th R Timothy D. Larson 12 H 12th N Geoff Luxenberg 13 H 13th R John W. Thompson 14 H 14th R William Aman 15 H 15th R David A. Baram 16 H 16th R Linda Schofield 17 H 17th R Timothy B. LeGeyt 18 H 18th R Andrew M. Fleischmann 19 H 19th N Brian Becker 20 H 20th N Joe Verrengia 21 H 21st N William Wadsworth 22 H 22nd R Elizabeth A. Boukus 23 H 23rd R Marilyn Giuliano 24 H 24th R Tim O'Brien 25 H 25th N Robert Sanchez 26 H 26th R Peter A. Tercyak 27 H 27th R Sandy H. Nafis 28 H 28th R Russell A. Morin 29 H 29th R Antonio Guerrera 30 H 30th R Joe Aresimowicz 31 H 31st N Prasad Srinivasan 32 H 32nd N Christie M. Carpino 33 H 33rd R Joseph C. Serra 34 H 34th R Gail K. Hamm 35 H 35th N James M. Crawford 36 H 36th N Philip Miller 37 H 37th R Ed Jutila 38 H 38th R Elizabeth B.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Standing Committee Hearings Appropriations
    JOINT STANDING COMMITTEE HEARINGS APPROPRIATIONS PART 24 7940 - 8259 2009 Section C • Non-Federal Resources (a) Grant Program (b) Applicant (c) Stale (d) Other Sources (e) Totals B. $0 9 $0 10. $0 11. $0 12. Total (sum of lines 8-11) $0 $0 $0 $0 Section D - Forecasted Cash Needs Tolal for 1st Year 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th quarter 13 Federal $7,075,000 $1,415,000 $3,537,500 $1,415,000 $707,500 14. Non-Federal $0 15 Total (sum of lines 13 and 14) $7,075,000 $1,415,000 $3,537,500 $1,415,000 $707,500 Section E - Budget Estimates of Federal Funds Needed for Balance of the Project Future Funding Periods (Years) (a) Grant Program (b) First (c) Second (d) Third (e) Fourth 16. EECBG-LocalGov't Subgrants $2,134,150 17. EECBG-Regional Subgrants $384,350 18. 19 20. Total (sum of lines 16-19) $2,518,500 $0 $0 $0 Section F - Other Budget Information I 'J" ' 1 21. Direct Charges 22. Indirect Charges 23. Remarks Page 2 of 4 SF-424A (Rev. 4-92) O Previous Edition Usable Prescribed by OMB Circular A-102 ® Authorized for Local Reproduction 10 O I I I I Instructions for the SF-424A Public Reporting Burden (or this collection of Information is estimated to average 3.0 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information Please do not return your completed form to the Office of Management and Budget; send it to the address provided by the sponsoring agency - : ( General Instructions For continuing grant program applications, submit these forms before the end of This form is designed so that application can be made for funds from one or more grant .
    [Show full text]
  • Home Energy Affordability Gap: 2010 (Connecticut Legislative Districts)
    HOME ENERGY AFFORDABILITY GAP: 2010 Connecticut Legislative Districts Prepared for: Operation Fuel Bloomfield, Connecticut Pat Wrice, Executive Director Prepared by: Roger D. Colton Fisher, Sheehan & Colton Public Finance and General Economics Belmont, Massachusetts January 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents………………………………………………………. i Table of Tables…………………………………………………….…… ii The Home Energy Affordability Gap in Connecticut………………….. 1 Home Energy Affordability Gap Reaches into Moderate Income……... 3 Home Energy Burdens…………………………………………………. 5 Federal LIHEAP Coverage……………………………………………... 6 Basic Family Needs Budgets…………………………………………… 7 What Contributes to the Inability to Meet Basic Needs Budget………… 9 Overall Median Income………………………………………………… 10 The Particular Needs of the Working Poor…………………………….. 10 Impact of Energy Prices on Total Shelter Costs……………….. 12 Household Responses to Energy Affordability…………………………. 13 Increasing Funding for Bill Payment Assistance Programs…………….. 15 Funding for LIHEAP………………………………………………….. 15 State Public Benefits Programs……………………………………….. 15 Fuel Fund Funding……………………………………………………. 17 Additional Actions Not Considered…………………………………... 18 Connecticut Home Energy Affordability Gap: 2010 Page i TABLE OF TABLES TABLE Total Home Energy Affordability Gap by Congressional 1 2 District…………………………………………………………… Increase in Home Energy Affordability Gap by Federal Poverty 2 4 Level……………………………………………………………... 3 Poverty Households in Connecticut (2000 Census)……….…….. 5 State Aggregate Home Energy Burdens by Ratio of Income to
    [Show full text]
  • Candidate Registration List for Election Year 2012
    Candidate Registration List for Election Year 2012 ** Committees designated as "participating" have filed an SEEC CEP Form 10 indicating an Intent to Abide by Program rules. This designation does not indicate that any part of the grant application is complete or sufficient and grant awards are subject to Commission determination. Committees designated as "non-participating" have filed an SEEC CEP Form 11 or 13 indicating an Intent Not to Abide by Program rules, have registered an exemption which renders them ineligible to participate in the Program, or have missed the deadline for filing an SEEC CEP Form 10. *** An "active-exempt" designation indicates that the candidate is currently registered with the SEEC but has filed an exemption to forming a candidate committee because they are entirely self-financed, will receive and spend less than $1000, are running as part of a slate with a town committee or a political committee, or will raise and spend no money. Citizens' Citizens' Election Election Office Program Program Committee Candidate Committee Name Sought District Party Status ** Grant Status *** Election Date Kenneth Lerman Kenneth B Lerman State 001 Republican NonParticipat Terminated 11/06/2012 Representativ ing e Matthew Ritter Ritter 2012 State 001 Democrat Participating Grant Terminated 11/06/2012 Representativ Awarded e Dan Carter Dan Carter 2012 State 002 Republican Participating Grant Terminated 11/06/2012 Representativ Awarded e Steven Demoura Demoura 2012 State 002 Democrat Participating Grant Terminated 11/06/2012 Representativ
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Standing Committee Hearings Judiciary Part 10
    JOINT STANDING COMMITTEE HEARINGS JUDICIARY PART 10 2971 - 3296 2009 002971 196 March 6, 2009 pat JUDICIARY COMMITTEE 11:00 A.M. the power to do, so we think Section 2 should be struck from the bill. Section 7, which you had a very long discussion with Dave Reynolds from the Catholic Church about earlier today, and I want to circle around back to that. And Section 17, which you've already had some discussion about, and you know, Section 17 this is why we think this bill needs to be amended. It goes far beyond the Kerrigan ruling. This is not just a mere case of legislative housekeeping. And you know, I would cite as evidence of that, no less an authority than Ben Klein when he was here testifying with Senator McLachlan, Klein himself said it's not required. The Kerrigan ruling does not require that Section 17 be repealed in its entirety. In fact, his exact words were, nothing, as I wrote them down, nothing in Kerrigan mandates its removal. You even saw a distinction between the five subsections inside the bill from Representative Lawlor when he was questioning Anne Stanback. Representative Lawlor said obviously, Subsections 4 and 5 need to be removed because they conflict with Kerrigan. That word obviously, that distinction, I think is very important. There is no good reason why Subsections, the other subsections, of course, Subsection 4 on same sex marriage, we understand where that would conflict with Kerrigan but there's no reason why the first three subsections of that bill need to be removed.
    [Show full text]