DOCSLIB.ORG

Integrity Management of Subsea Facilities Through the Use of Cross Industry Good Practice Guidance

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Integrity Management of Subsea Facilities Through the Use of Cross Industry Good Practice Guidance Integrity Management of Subsea Facilities through the use of Cross Industry Good Practice Guidance Dr Cameron Stewart, Upstream Technical Manager, The Energy Institute Rob Swindell, Global Director Vibration Engineering, Xodus Group Date: 21st May 2013 Venue: Holiday Inn, Westhill, Aberdeenshire Host: Subsea Pipelines Integrity Management Conference, Subsea UK Contents & Presentation Structure Ø Introducing the Energy Institute (EI) Ø EI Technical Work Programme Ø Technical Committees Ø Good Practice Guidance Development Ø Recently published EI Subsea Guidance Announcing New Guidance for the Management of Subsea AVIFF Ø Invite Call to Subsea Industry Ø Questions and Answers EI Activity Introducing the Energy Institute The Energy Institute (EI) is the professional body for the energy industry, delivering professionalism and good practice across the depth and breadth of the energy sector. The EI: •is a learned society •is a not for profit organisation •has charitable status •is a Royal Chartered body EI: Sharing energy knowledge… Delivering good practice and professionalism Energy Institute Members & Member Organisations Branches •The EI has 15 000 individual members •The EI HQ has a main office in from across the energy sector London and a presence also in Aberdeen •The EI has over 300 company members, working in and supporting the •The EI has a network of branches wider energy sector through the UK and also internationally •The EI has a number of key technical partners supporting the EI in the •International branches include- delivery of good practice and Lagos, Dublin, Abu Dhabi, Hong professionalism Kong, Kuala Lumpar, Singapore EI Technical Work Programme A core pillar of the EI is the development and publication of good practice. This is facilitated through the EI Technical Work Programme, which is supported by the EI’s Technical Partners. “The EI’s Technical Programme aims to provide industry with cost effective, value adding knowledge on key current and future issues.” The role of the EI is to act as an honest broker between industry and regulator, supporting and facilitating self-regulation in the energy industry. EI Upstream Activity Technical Committees EI’s Technical Partners The technical partners support the EI in the delivery of good practice guidance for the wider industry to: 1. Demonstrate to regulatory authorities industry is operating using good practice 2. Assist industry operations /achieve their objectives. 3. Provide a forum for regulators to access industry on technical issues This is achieved by: 1. Setting the strategic direction for the EI’s Technical Programme 2. Funding the Institute to enable the running of committees and to resource consulting services as needed EI: Sharing energy knowledge… Delivering good practice and professionalism Energy Institute Current Technical (STAC) Members: • E.ON • Centrica • Statoil • Kuwait Petroleum Aviation • BP Exploration Operating • Maersk Oil North Sea Ltd Company Ltd • Murco Petroleum Ltd. • BP Oil UK Ltd • RWE npower • Shell UK Exploration & • Shell UK Oil Products Ltd Production • Saudi Aramco • ConocoPhillips • Total E & P UK plc • Phillips 66 • Total UK Ltd • Talisman Energy (UK) Ltd • Nexen • ExxonMobil • ENI • BG Group • Premier Oil • Chevron • WFS • EDF • International Power • Valero • Dong Energy • SSE • Statkraft • Scottish Power • Vattenfall EI Technical Committees – Developing Good Practice Technical Guidance for the Energy Industry Process Safety Committee (PSC) ØCross sector coverage of safety, human factors, electrical classifications etc Corrosion Management Committee (CMC) ØUpstream vehicle for Corrosion Engineering and Management Good Practice Guidance ØRecently CMC (and its published Guidance) was cited in the HSE KP4 Interim Report Presentation (November 2012, Aberdeen) as a major contributor to the success of the Industry in delivering on KP4 Corrosion Related Issues Ageing and Life extension Working Group (ALEWG) ØTechnical Guidance development for upstream Industry ØLinked into equivalent downstream activity for cross learning Øand represented on cross-energy industry ALE Forum Recently Published Guidelines... ...for the Subsea Industry Recently Published Guidelines for the Subsea Industry Subsea AVIFF – Avoidance of Vibration Induced Fatigue Failure Overview ØEI Subsea JIP for avoidance of vibration induced fatigue failure in process piping – Project S1116 ØFunding in place via EI Scientific and Technical Committee (STAC) ØBuilds on the ‘topsides’ version of the EI Guidelines for vibration induced fatigue of process pipework, but adds new screening methods and guidance on design, simulation and monitoring ØSteering committee includes BP, Chevron, Nexen, Shell, Total, HSE Subsea AVIFF – Avoidance of Vibration Induced Fatigue Failure Subsea Experience ØAssessment of subsea systems to vibration-induced fatigue has been largely limited to vortex-induced vibration (VIV) of riser systems and unsupported pipeline spans (i.e. environmental loading) ØPiping vibration due to process excitation has started to become an issue on manifolds and jumpers, in part associated with increasing flowrates ØAdditional problems have been experienced with valves and instrumentation Subsea AVIFF Objective ØProduce engineering guidelines for use at the design stage or when changes to existing systems are being contemplated Emphasis ØFor new designs, ‘designing out’ the issue ØFor existing equipment, identifying and mitigating the threat Timeline ØFirst meeting June 2011 ØDrafting completed end 2012 and has been Balloted ØIncorporation of final corrections before formal publication – early Q3 2013 Subsea AVIFF Subsea AVIFF Subsea AVIFF Vibration excitation mechanisms included: ØFlow induced turbulence / multiphase flow ØPulsation: flow induced excitation (deadleg) ØPulsation: flow induced excitation (rough bore risers/jumpers) ØHigh frequency acoustic excitation (acoustic fatigue) ØSurge/momentum changes due to valve operation ØCavitation and flashing ØVortex induced vibration Subsea AVIFF Rough bore flexibles: ØDiscrete frequency excitation generated by flow instability / vortex shedding ØGenerally confined to ‘dry’ gas systems ØFrequency range: typically up to 300 Hz but can be as high as 1000 Hz Subsea AVIFF Forward vision: ØDevelopment of better predictive models when detailed vibration analyses are required beyond the screening stage ØSmall-scale laboratory testing ØFull-scale laboratory testing ØIn-situ measurements ØCorrelation to analytical models – smart use of monitoring data and simulation Invite to Subsea Industry Are there gaps in current Good Practice Guidance provision for the Subsea Energy Business? EI can help you to put that Guidance in place Thank you Questions now or…later… For further information please contact Dr C Stewart on [email protected] Tel - 07751 357608 & see www.energyinst.org/home www.energyinstpubs.org.uk.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Annual Review 2014 Incorporating the Annual Report and Accounts of the Institution of Chemical Engineers
    ADVANCING CHEMICAL ENGINEERING WORLDWIDE Annual Review 2014 Incorporating the annual report and accounts of the Institution of Chemical Engineers Chemical engineers creating, maintaining and improving quality of life Shining a light on chemical engineering At the start of my presidential year, I made three commitments. First, I stressed the need for chemical engineers to stand up and speak out on behalf of our profession and I pledged to lead from the front. Second, I emphasised the importance of building bridges with other stakeholders on the chemical engineering landscape and I promised to build on Chemical Engineering Matters as a platform for communication, both inside and outside IChemE. Finally, I stressed the need for the Institution to be more active in emphasising to those outside our profession, not least governments, the role of chemical engineering in securing sustainable energy solutions. There have been developments on all fronts. In May, I initiated a daily blog with the intention of shining a light on chemical engineering on all 365 days of my presidency. My chemical engineering good news stories have been read and shared by more than 100,000 readers in 160 countries. I trust that this has provided inspiration and encouragement to chemical engineers everywhere. The partnerships with the South African Institution of Chemical Engineers and the Mary Kay O’Connor Process Safety Center evidence our willingness to collaborate; as does the joint statement on climate change that we signed with the Royal Society of Chemistry in November. Energy and climate change issues constantly feature as the top priority for our members.
    [Show full text]
  • High Level Framework for Process Safety Management
    High level framework for process safety management IMPORTANT: This file is subject to a licence agreement issued by the Energy Institute, London, UK. All rights reserved. It may only be used in accordance with the licence terms and conditions. It must not be forwarded to, or stored or accessed by, any unauthorised user. Enquiries: e: [email protected] t: +44 (0)207 467 7100 HIGH LEVEL FRAMEWORK FOR PROCESS SAFETY MANAGEMENT 1st edition December 2010 Published by ENERGY INSTITUTE, LONDON The Energy Institute is a professional membership body incorporated by Royal Charter 2003 Registered charity number 1097899 IMPORTANT: This file is subject to a licence agreement issued by the Energy Institute, London, UK. All rights reserved. It may only be used in accordance with the licence terms and conditions. It must not be forwarded to, or stored or accessed by, any unauthorised user. Enquiries: e: [email protected] t: +44 (0)207 467 7100 The Energy Institute (EI) is the leading chartered professional membership body supporting individuals and organisations across the energy industry. With a combined membership of over 13 500 individuals and 300 companies in 100 countries, it provides an independent focal point for the energy community and a powerful voice to engage business and industry, government, academia and the public internationally. As a Royal Charter organisation, the EI offers professional recognition and sustains personal career development through the accreditation and delivery of training courses, conferences and publications and networking opportunities. It also runs a highly valued technical work programme, comprising original independent research and investigations, and the provision of EI technical publications to provide the international industry with information and guidance on key current and future issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Good Plant Design and Operation for Onshore Carbon Capture Installations and Onshore Pipelines
    Good plant design and operation for onshore carbon capture installations and onshore pipelines Registered Charity Number 1097899 GOOD PLANT DESIGN AND OPERATION FOR ONSHORE CARBON CAPTURE INSTALLATIONS AND ONSHORE PIPELINES A Recommended Practice Guidance Document First edition September 2010 Published by ENERGY INSTITUTE, LONDON The Energy Institute is a professional membership body incorporated by Royal Charter 2003 Registered charity number 1097899 The Energy Institute (EI) is the leading chartered professional membership body supporting individuals and organisations across the energy industry. With a combined membership of over 13 500 individuals and 300 companies in 100 countries, it provides an independent focal point for the energy community and a powerful voice to engage business and industry, government, academia and the public internationally. As a Royal Charter organisation, the EI offers professional recognition and sustains personal career development through the accreditation and delivery of training courses, conferences and publications and networking opportunities. It also runs a highly valued technical work programme, comprising original independent research and investigations, and the provision of EI technical publications to provide the international industry with information and guidance on key current and future issues. The EI promotes the safe, environmentally responsible and efficient supply and use of energy in all its forms and applications. In fulfilling this purpose the EI addresses the depth and breadth of energy and the energy system, from upstream and downstream hydrocarbons and other primary fuels and renewables, to power generation, transmission and distribution to sustainable development, demand side management and energy efficiency. Offering learning and networking opportunities to support career development, the EI provides a home to all those working in energy, and a scientific and technical reservoir of knowledge for industry.
    [Show full text]
  • The DA GHGI Improvement Programme 2009-2010 Industry Sector Task
    The DA GHGI Improvement Programme 2009-2010 Industry Sector Task DECC, The Scottish Government, The Welsh Assembly Government and the Northern Ireland Department of the Environment AEAT/ENV/R/2990_3 Issue 1 May 2010 DA GHGI Improvements 2009-2010: Industry Task Restricted – Commercial AEAT/ENV/R/2990_3 Title The DA GHGI Improvement Programme 2009-2010: Industry Sector Task Customer DECC, The Scottish Government, The Welsh Assembly Government and the Northern Ireland Department of the Environment Customer reference NAEI Framework Agreement/DA GHGI Improvement Programme Confidentiality, Crown Copyright copyright and reproduction File reference 45322/2008/CD6774/GT Reference number AEAT/ENV/R/2990_3 /Issue 1 AEA Group 329 Harwell Didcot Oxfordshire OX11 0QJ Tel.: 0870 190 6584 AEA is a business name of AEA Technology plc AEA is certificated to ISO9001 and ISO14001 Authors Name Stuart Sneddon and Glen Thistlethwaite Approved by Name Neil Passant Signature Date 20th May 2010 ii AEA Restricted – Commercial DA GHGI Improvements 2009-2010: Industry Task AEAT/ENV/R/2990_3 Executive Summary This research has been commissioned under the UK and DA GHG inventory improvement programme, and aims to research emissions data for a group of source sectors and specific sites where uncertainties have been identified in the scope and accuracy of available source data. Primarily this research aims to review site-specific data and regulatory information, to resolve differences between GHG data reported across different emission reporting mechanisms. The research has comprised: 1) Data review from different reporting mechanisms (IPPC, EU ETS and EEMS) to identify priority sites (primarily oil & gas terminals, refineries and petrochemicals), i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Jet Fuel Thermal Oxidation Tube Rating Training Guidelines (IP 323)
    Jet fuel thermal oxidation tube rating training guidelines (IP 323) This publication has been produced as a result of work carried out within the Technical Team of the Energy Institute (EI), funded by the EI’s Technical Partners. The EI’s Technical Work Programme provides industry with cost-effective, value-adding knowledge on key current and future issues affecting those operating in the energy sector, both in the UK and internationally. For further information, please visit http://www.energyinst.org The EI gratefully acknowledges the financial contributions towards the scientific and technical programme from the following companies BG Group Murco Petroleum Ltd BP Exploration Operating Co Ltd Nexen BP Oil UK Ltd Premier Oil Centrica RWE npower Chevron Saudi Aramco ConocoPhillips Ltd Shell UK Oil Products Limited EDF Energy Shell U.K. Exploration and Production Ltd ENI Statoil Hydro E. ON UK Talisman Energy (UK) Ltd ExxonMobil International Ltd Total E&P UK plc Kuwait Petroleum International Ltd Total UK Limited Maersk Oil North Sea UK Limited World Fuel Services Copyright © 2011 by the Energy Institute, London. The Energy Institute is a professional membership body incorporated by Royal Charter 2003. Registered charity number 1097899, England All rights reserved No part of this book may be reproduced by any means, or transmitted or translated into a machine language without the written permission of the publisher. ISBN 978 0 85293 561 3 Published by the Energy Institute The information contained in this publication is provided as guidance only and while every reasonable care has been taken to ensure the accuracy of its contents, the Energy Institute cannot accept any responsibility for any action taken, or not taken, on the basis of this information.
    [Show full text]
  • Modified UK National Implementation Measures for Phase III of the EU Emissions Trading System
    Modified UK National Implementation Measures for Phase III of the EU Emissions Trading System As submitted to the European Commission in April 2012 following the first stage of their scrutiny process This document has been issued by the Department of Energy and Climate Change, together with the Devolved Administrations for Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales. April 2012 UK’s National Implementation Measures submission – April 2012 Modified UK National Implementation Measures for Phase III of the EU Emissions Trading System As submitted to the European Commission in April 2012 following the first stage of their scrutiny process On 12 December 2011, the UK submitted to the European Commission the UK’s National Implementation Measures (NIMs), containing the preliminary levels of free allocation of allowances to installations under Phase III of the EU Emissions Trading System (2013-2020), in accordance with Article 11 of the revised ETS Directive (2009/29/EC). In response to queries raised by the European Commission during the first stage of their assessment of the UK’s NIMs, the UK has made a small number of modifications to its NIMs. This includes the introduction of preliminary levels of free allocation for four additional installations and amendments to the preliminary free allocation levels of seven installations that were included in the original NIMs submission. The operators of the installations affected have been informed directly of these changes. The allocations are not final at this stage as the Commission’s NIMs scrutiny process is ongoing. Only when all installation-level allocations for an EU Member State have been approved will that Member State’s NIMs and the preliminary levels of allocation be accepted.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Participation in Trade Associations: Climate – 2021
    Our participation in trade associations: climate 2021 progress update Contents Introduction 2 Our approach 3 Progress updates 4 American Petroleum Institute (API) 4 Australian institute of Petroleum (AIP) 4 Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers (CAPP) 5 National Association of Manufacturers (NAM) 5 US Chamber of Commerce 5 Next steps 5 Our memberships 6 Cautionary Statement In order to utilize the ‘safe harbor’ provisions of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the ‘PSLRA’), bp is providing the following cautionary statement. This document contains certain forward-looking statements – that is, statements related to future, not past, events and circumstances which may relate to one or more of the financial condition, results of operations and businesses of bp and certain of the plans and objectives of bp with respect to these items. These statements are generally, but not always, identified by the use of words such as ‘will’, ‘expects’, ‘is expected to’, ‘aims’, ‘should’, ‘may’, ‘objective’, ‘is likely to’, ‘intends’, ‘believes’, ‘anticipates’, ‘plans’, ‘we see’ or similar expressions. Actual results may differ from those expressed in such statements, depending on a variety of factors including the risk factors set forth in our most recent Annual Report and Form 20-F under ‘Risk factors’ and in any of our more recent public reports. No material in this document forms any part of any of those documents. No part of this document constitutes, or shall be taken to constitute, an invitation or inducement to invest in BP p.l.c. or any other entity and must not be relied upon in any way in connection with any investment decisions.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Original Attachment
    Operator Name Location Name Address Name Address Street Address Town Address County Address Postcode 1 Address Postcode 2 Incumbent Duty Type Text Previous Name LA Code Local Authority Country AMG Superalloys UK Limited Rotherham Fullerton Road Rotherham South Yorkshire S60 1DL COMAH Upper Tier Operator (was London & Scandinavian Metallurgical Co Ltd) 4415 Rotherham England Anglian Water Services Limited Wing Water Treatment Works Morcott Road Oakham Rutland LE15 8SA COMAH Upper Tier Operator 2470 Rutland UA England Arch Timber Protection Limited Huddersfield Huddersfield Works Leeds Road Huddersfield West Yorkshire HD2 1YU COMAH Upper Tier Operator (was Arch UK Biocides Ltd) 4715 Kirklees England Argenta Dundee Limited Dundee Dunsinane Industrial Estate Kinnoull Road Dundee Angus DD2 3XR COMAH Upper Tier Operator (was Vericore Limited) 9059 Dundee UA Scotland Associated British Ports Immingham Dock Immingham Dock Immingham Lincolnshire DN40 2NS COMAH Upper Tier Operator 2002 North East Lincolnshire England Associated Petroleum Terminals (Immingham) Limited Immingham Main Terminal Queens Road Immingham North East Lincolnshire DN40 2PN COMAH Upper Tier Operator 2002 North East Lincolnshire England Avanti Gas Limited Ellesmere Port Britannia Road Ellesmere Port Cheshire CH65 4HB COMAH Upper Tier Operator (was Shell Gas Limited) 4325 Wirral England Avara Avlon Pharma Services Limited Avlon Works Severn Road Bristol South Gloucestershire BS10 7ZE COMAH Upper Tier Operator (was AstraZeneca UK Limited) 0119 South Gloucs UA England BAE Systems
    [Show full text]
  • Big Oil Goes to College an Analysis of 10 Research Collaboration Contracts Between Leading Energy Companies and Major U.S
    ISTOCKPHOTO/SSHEPHARD Big Oil Goes to College An Analysis of 10 Research Collaboration Contracts between Leading Energy Companies and Major U.S. Universities Jennifer Washburn October 2010 (updated) WWW.AMERICANPROGRESS.ORG ii Center for American Progress | Big Oil Goes Back to College Big Oil Goes to College An Analysis of 10 Research Collaboration Contracts between Leading Energy Companies and Major U.S. Universities Jennifer Washburn With research assistance from Derrin Culp, and legal analysis and interpretation of university-industry research agreements by Jeremiah Miller October 2010 Contents 1 Preface 5 Introduction and summary 29 Energy research at U.S. universities 32 The university perspective 38 The energy industry perspective 45 The U.S. government perspective 49 A detailed analysis of 10 university-industry agreements to finance energy research 52 Table: Summary of main contract analysis findings 60 Overview of the 10 agreements: Major findings 69 Recommendations 74 Conclusion 75 Appendix one—Detailed contract review Arizona State University & BP Technology Ventures, Inc., a unit of BP PLC 85 Appendix two—Detailed contract review Energy Biosciences Institute University of California at Berkeley; Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory; University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign & BP Technology Ventures, Inc., a unit of BP PLC 106 Appendix three —Detailed contract review University of California at Davis & Chevron Technology Ventures, LLC, a unit of Chevron Corp. 114 Appendix four—Detailed contract review Chevron Center of Research Excellence Colorado School of Mines & ChevronTexaco Energy Technology Co., a unit of Chevron Corp. 122 Appendix five—Detailed contract review Colorado Center for Biorefining and Biofuels University of Colorado, Boulder; Colorado State University; Colorado School of Mines; National Renewable Energy Laboratory & Numerous industrial partners 135 Appendix six—Detailed contract review Georgia Institute of Technology & Chevron Technology Ventures LLC, a unit of Chevron Corp.
    [Show full text]
  • Gas B N Gas M Rence G NG 46 Ember Ea Ga Marke Gény 6 2010 Me Ch
    Can Unconventional Gas be a Game Changer in European Gas Markets? Florence Gény NG 46 December 2010 i The contents of this paper are the authors’ sole responsibility. They do not necessarily represent the views of the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies or any of its members. Copyright © 2010 Oxford Institute for Energy Studies (Registered Charity, No. 286084) This publication may be reproduced in part for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgment of the source is made. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies. ISBN 978-1-907555-17-6 ii Preface Since the late 2000s, unconventional gas has become the most important new energy issue to reach public consciousness. In the United States, where gas production was in decline and imports were increasing, the revolution in (especially) shale gas production has completely transformed the outlook; production is rising and imports have fallen sharply. The prospect of a similar revolution in Europe has given rise to a huge number of conferences, op-ed articles and blogs which have created a wave of hype, but little clarity, about the subject. When Florence Gény agreed to join OIES to conduct a detailed research study of shale gas development in Europe, this provided our Programme with a major and important new avenue of study. Europeans are generally unaware of the long history of unconventional gas development in the US, and the legal, fiscal, environmental and land use particularities which enabled the technical breakthrough in production techniques to be implemented so rapidly.
    [Show full text]
  • Design, Construction, Modification, Maintenance and Decommissioning of Filling Stations
    Design, construction, modification, maintenance and decommissioning of filling stations 3rd edition Jointly published by the APEA and Energy Institute 3rd edition APEA/EI DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, MODIFICATION, MAINTENANCE AND DECOMMISSIONING OF FILLING STATIONS 3rd edition June 2011 Published by The Association for Petroleum and Explosives Administration (APEA) and ENERGY INSTITUTE, LONDON The Energy Institute is a professional membership body incorporated by Royal Charter 2003 Registered charity number 1097899 The Energy Institute (EI) is the leading chartered professional membership body supporting individuals and organisations across the energy industry. With a combined membership of over 14 000 individuals and 300 companies in 100 countries, it provides an independent focal point for the energy community and a powerful voice to engage business and industry, government, academia and the public internationally. As a Royal Charter organisation, the EI offers professional recognition and sustains personal career development through the accreditation and delivery of training courses, conferences and publications and networking opportunities. It also runs a highly valued technical work programme, comprising original independent research and investigations, and the provision of EI technical publications to provide the international industry with information and guidance on key current and future issues. For further information, please visit http://www.energyinst.org The EI gratefully acknowledges the financial contributions towards the scientific and technical programme from the following companies: BG Group Murco Petroleum Ltd BP Exploration Operating Co Ltd Nexen BP Oil UK Ltd Premier Oil Centrica RWE npower Chevron Saudi Aramco ConocoPhillips Ltd Shell UK Oil Products Limited EDF Energy Shell U.K. Exploration and Production Ltd ENI Statoil Hydro E.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Ceraweek Executive Conference Speakers-At-A-Glance
    2021 CERAWeek Executive Conference Speakers-at-a-Glance Ministers and Government Officials Iván Duque Márquez, President, Republic of Colombia John F. Kerry, Special Presidential Envoy for Climate, United States Joe Manchin, Senator, West Virginia, U.S. Senate Energy & Natural Resources Committee Daniel Sullivan, United States Senator, Alaska Gina McCarthy, National Climate Advisor, The White House Kathy Castor, United States Representative, 14th Congressional District, Florida Mohammad Barkindo, Secretary General, OPEC Shri Dharmendra Pradhan, Minister of Petroleum & Natural Gas and Minister of Steel, Government of India Seamus O’Regan, Jr., Minister of Natural Resources, Canada Kadri Simson, Commissioner for Energy, European Commission Angus Taylor, Minister for Energy & Emissions Reduction, Australia Suhail Mohamed Al Mazrouei, Minister of Energy & Industry UAE Dr. Yuval Steinitz, Minister of Energy, Israel Minister Tarek El Molla, Minister of Petroleum & Mineral Resources, Egypt Tina Bru, Minister of Petroleum & Energy, Norway Shin Hosaka, Commissioner, Agency for Natural Resources & Energy, Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) Arifin Tasrif, Minister of Energy & Mineral Resources, Indonesia René Ortíz Durán, Minister of Energy & Renewable Natural Resources, Ecuador Udaya Gammanpila, Minister of Energy, Sri Lanka Commissioner Richard Glick, Chairman, Federal Regulatory Commission (FERC) Jóse Armando Zamora Reyes, President, National Hydrocarbons Agency (ANH) Décio Oddone, Chief Executive Officer of O&G Independent, Enauta
    [Show full text]