DOCSLIB.ORG

From Unitary State to Plural Asymmetric State: Indigenous Quest in France, New Zealand and Canada

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
From Unitary State to Plural Asymmetric State: Indigenous Quest in France, New Zealand and Canada Jari Uimonen From Unitary State to Plural Asymmetric State: Indigenous Quest in France, New Zealand and Canada Acta Electronica Universitatis Lapponiensis 142 University of Lapland Faculty of Law © Jari Uimonen Cover: Mikko Sippola Layout: Essi Saloranta / Kronolia Sales: Lapland University Press BOX 8123 FI-90101 Rovaniemi Phone +358 40 821 4242 fax +358 16 362 932 [email protected] www.ulapland.fi/lup Paperback Acta Universitatis Lapponiensis 275 ISBN 978-952-484-717-9 ISSN 0788-7604 pdf Acta Electronica Universitatis Lapponiensis 142 ISBN 978-952-484-718-6 ISSN 1793-6310 Acknowledgements This research has a long history. I participated in the seminar of ethnohistory at the University of Helsinki in 1993. There I became for the first time interested in indigenous peoples. I continued with this theme when studying different branches of history, and becoming acquented with the questions of legal cultures and legal pluralism has opened up for me new perspectives on the Indigenous presence in various countries. For me, the collecting of material and the writing of the dissertation have been a rich expedition. I have done most of the research alongside my work, but for the last 1.5 years it has been possible to concentrate full-time on the research. For this I owe the Legal Cultures in Transnational World programme whose Finnish board I want to thank for the opportunity. No less important has been the positive attitude of my co-workers, especially Rev. Anne Angervo, Vaara-Karjala Parish Council and the Chapter of Kuopio Diocese, who have supported my studying in all its phases. I owe my utmost gratitude to two professors: to the late Matti Viikari, Professor of General History at the University of Helsinki, who encouraged me for the first time to approach the Indigenous world, and to my tutor, Professor Jaakko Husa, whose support, encouragement and guidance has been vital to the successful outcome of this research. I want also to thank the personel in the following libraries and institutions for their patience and aid: the University of Helsinki, the University of Turku, The University of Joensuu/Eastern Finland, The University of Lapland, The University of Tampere, The University of Jyväskylä, The University of Åbo Akademi; The Library of the Finnish Parliament; the Embassy of Canada; Centre culturel français; Dag Hammarskiöld Institute (Uppsala); La bibliothèque nationale (Paris); the British Library (London); the Congress Library (Washington, D.C.); McGill University and l’université de Montréal (Montréal); the National Library of Canada (Ottawa); Waikato University (Hamilton); and Victoria University and the National Library of New Zealand (Wellington). And I want also to thank Mr. Nicholas Kirkwood for the language check and Mr. Juhani Lautala for technical support. Last but not least, my family has been the best source of inspiration. I dedicate this work to my parents, to my wife Taru and my children Katariina and Lauri. On the 28 August 2013, at Kontiolahti Jari Uimonen Table of Contents Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................................... 3 Abbreviations ..................................................................................................................................... 9 Terminology ..................................................................................................................................... 12 1. Introduction .............................................................................................................21 1.1. General introduction ............................................................................................................ 21 1.2. The Many Faces of Law ......................................................................................................... 23 1.2.1. Comparison: Similarity or Difference? ............................................................... 23 1.2.2. Legal Positivism v. Legal Pluralism ...................................................................... 24 1.2.3. Mixing Law: Family Tree, Legal Culture and Tradition .................................... 27 1.2.4. Contextual Aspects ................................................................................................ 30 1.3. Legal Environment ................................................................................................................ 34 1.3.1. France: Domain of Civil Law ................................................................................ 34 1.3.2. New Zealand: Britain Overseas ............................................................................ 38 1.3.3. Canada: A Hybrid System .................................................................................... 42 1.4. The Indigenous Communities ............................................................................................. 45 1.4.1. France: Invisible Minorities .................................................................................. 45 1.4.2. New Zealand: Polynesian Presence ..................................................................... 47 1.4.3. Canada: Three Strands of Indigenuity ................................................................. 48 1.5. Search of Plurality.................................................................................................................. 50 2. Unitary State and the Devolution of Powers............................................................54 2.1. Basic Principles ...................................................................................................................... 54 2.1.1. Sovereignty .............................................................................................................. 54 2.1.2. State .......................................................................................................................... 58 2.1.3. Self-Determination, Autonomy and Secession .................................................. 62 2.2. Indigenous Rights ................................................................................................................. 66 2.2.1. Noble Savage .......................................................................................................... 66 2.2.2. Marshall Trilogy and the Colonial Policy ........................................................... 68 2.2.3. Modern Developments and Discussion ............................................................. 71 2.3. The Constitutional Principles .............................................................................................. 74 2.3.1. France ...................................................................................................................... 74 2.3.1.1. Une république indivisible ........................................................................... 74 2.3.1.2. Secularism ..................................................................................................... 76 2.3.1.3. Democratic and Social Republic ................................................................ 77 2.3.1.4. Equality and Education ............................................................................... 78 2.3.1.5. Language Rights .......................................................................................... 79 2.3.2. New Zealand: Unwritten Principles .................................................................... 81 2.3.3. Canada ..................................................................................................................... 82 2.3.3.1. Fundamental Principles .............................................................................. 83 2.3.3.2. Rights in the Constitution Act, 1982 ......................................................... 87 2.4. Decentralisation / Devolution ............................................................................................. 88 2.4.1. France: From Centralisation to Decentralisation .............................................. 88 2.4.2. New Zealand ........................................................................................................... 92 2.4.2.1. Realm of New Zealand ................................................................................ 92 2.4.2.2. Local Government ...................................................................................... 92 2.4.3. The Provinces and Territories in Canada ............................................................ 93 2.5. Conclusions ............................................................................................................................ 94 3. Law and Justice .........................................................................................................97 3.1. France ...................................................................................................................................... 97 3.1.1. Spécialité legislative ................................................................................................. 97 3.1.2. Loi du pays.............................................................................................................100 3.1.3. Indigenous Courts and Institutions ...................................................................102 3.1.4. Customary Law ....................................................................................................103 3.1.5. Indigénat and Customary Enforcement of Law ...............................................105
Load more

Recommended publications
  • OECD/IMHE Project Self Evaluation Report: Atlantic Canada, Canada
    OECD/IMHE Project Supporting the Contribution of Higher Education Institutions to Regional Development Self Evaluation Report: Atlantic Canada, Canada Wade Locke (Memorial University), Elizabeth Beale (Atlantic Provinces Economic Council), Robert Greenwood (Harris Centre, Memorial University), Cyril Farrell (Atlantic Provinces Community College Consortium), Stephen Tomblin (Memorial University), Pierre-Marcel Dejardins (Université de Moncton), Frank Strain (Mount Allison University), and Godfrey Baldacchino (University of Prince Edward Island) December 2006 (Revised March 2007) ii Acknowledgements This self-evaluation report addresses the contribution of higher education institutions (HEIs) to the development of the Atlantic region of Canada. This study was undertaken following the decision of a broad group of partners in Atlantic Canada to join the OECD/IMHE project “Supporting the Contribution of Higher Education Institutions to Regional Development”. Atlantic Canada was one of the last regions, and the only North American region, to enter into this project. It is also one of the largest groups of partners to participate in this OECD project, with engagement from the federal government; four provincial governments, all with separate responsibility for higher education; 17 publicly funded universities; all colleges in the region; and a range of other partners in economic development. As such, it must be appreciated that this report represents a major undertaking in a very short period of time. A research process was put in place to facilitate the completion of this self-evaluation report. The process was multifaceted and consultative in nature, drawing on current data, direct input from HEIs and the perspectives of a broad array of stakeholders across the region. An extensive effort was undertaken to ensure that input was received from all key stakeholders, through surveys completed by HEIs, one-on-one interviews conducted with government officials and focus groups conducted in each province which included a high level of private sector participation.
    [Show full text]
  • Transtext(E)S Transcultures 跨文本跨文化, 15 | 2020 Between Censorship and Amnesia: the End of the Penal Colony in French Guiana 2
    Transtext(e)s Transcultures 跨文本跨文化 Journal of Global Cultural Studies 15 | 2020 Censure et productions culturelles postcoloniales Between Censorship and Amnesia: The End of The Penal Colony in French Guiana Entre censure et amnésie : la fin du bagne en Guyane Charles Forsdick Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/transtexts/1503 DOI: 10.4000/transtexts.1503 ISSN: 2105-2549 Publisher Gregory B. Lee Electronic reference Charles Forsdick, “Between Censorship and Amnesia: The End of The Penal Colony in French Guiana”, Transtext(e)s Transcultures 跨文本跨文化 [Online], 15 | 2020, Online since 14 December 2020, connection on 26 January 2021. URL: http://journals.openedition.org/transtexts/1503 ; DOI: https:// doi.org/10.4000/transtexts.1503 This text was automatically generated on 26 January 2021. © Tous droits réservés Between Censorship and Amnesia: The End of The Penal Colony in French Guiana 1 Between Censorship and Amnesia: The End of The Penal Colony in French Guiana Entre censure et amnésie : la fin du bagne en Guyane Charles Forsdick 1 Literature serves as an immediate, spontaneous response to historical change, and can become a privileged site at which sense is made of that change as it occurs. Part of the singularity of the literary text is rooted in its poetics, and its deployment of form and discourse in ways that capture and even harness the dynamic circumstances of the end of empire. Poetry, fiction and other genres often represent the dilemmas and ambiguities of the decolonial tipping point, providing a trace of the
    [Show full text]
  • THE SPECIAL COUNCILS of LOWER CANADA, 1838-1841 By
    “LE CONSEIL SPÉCIAL EST MORT, VIVE LE CONSEIL SPÉCIAL!” THE SPECIAL COUNCILS OF LOWER CANADA, 1838-1841 by Maxime Dagenais Dissertation submitted to the School of Graduate Studies and Research in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the PhD degree in History. Department of History Faculty of Arts Université d’Ottawa\ University of Ottawa © Maxime Dagenais, Ottawa, Canada, 2011 ii ABSTRACT “LE CONSEIL SPÉCIAL EST MORT, VIVE LE CONSEIL SPÉCIAL!” THE SPECIAL COUNCILS OF LOWER CANADA, 1838-1841 Maxime Dagenais Supervisor: University of Ottawa, 2011 Professor Peter Bischoff Although the 1837-38 Rebellions and the Union of the Canadas have received much attention from historians, the Special Council—a political body that bridged two constitutions—remains largely unexplored in comparison. This dissertation considers its time as the legislature of Lower Canada. More specifically, it examines its social, political and economic impact on the colony and its inhabitants. Based on the works of previous historians and on various primary sources, this dissertation first demonstrates that the Special Council proved to be very important to Lower Canada, but more specifically, to British merchants and Tories. After years of frustration for this group, the era of the Special Council represented what could be called a “catching up” period regarding their social, commercial and economic interests in the colony. This first section ends with an evaluation of the legacy of the Special Council, and posits the theory that the period was revolutionary as it produced several ordinances that changed the colony’s social, economic and political culture This first section will also set the stage for the most important matter considered in this dissertation as it emphasizes the Special Council’s authoritarianism.
    [Show full text]
  • French Reaction to the Menace from Cabanos and Bonis Within the Litigious Territory Between Brazil and French Guiana (1836-1841)1
    125 French reaction to the menace from Cabanos and Bonis within the litigious territory between Brazil and French Guiana (1836-1841)1 Reação francesa às ameaças de Cabanos e Bonis no território litigioso do Amapá (1836-1841) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2236-463320161408 Débora Bendocchi Alves Instituto de História Ibérica e Latinoamericana (IHILA) Faculdade de História da Universidade de Colônia, Colônia, Alemanha [email protected] Abstract: This article will analyze an historical episode that occurred between 1836 and 1841 during the French occupation of the disputed territory located between Brazil and French Guiana. I intend to consider two regional factors that influenced the decision of both the Cayenne Government and the metropolitan government to build military forts in the region. Such factors are the Cabanagem and the attempts of black Bonis to settle in Lower Oiapoque. I will go on to show that the French withdrawal from Amapá Lake in 1840, but not from the post on the right bank of the Oiapoque River, was due not only to international and diplomatic factors but also had regional causes. Notwithstanding the French government's interests in expanding the territory of its South American colony, I want to draw attention to the threats - real or fictitious - of Cabanos, from Brazil, and black Bonis, from Dutch Guiana. 1 This article forms part of a research project funded by Gerda Henkel Foundation (Germany) about the region of the French-Brazilian Boarding between 1840-1900. It is a revised and extended version of my participation at the ANPUH 2015 XXVIII National History Symposium, held in Florianópolis.
    [Show full text]
  • Eight History Lessons Grade 8
    Eight History Lessons Grade 8 Submitted By: Rebecca Neadow 05952401 Submitted To: Ted Christou CURR 355 Submitted On: November 15, 2013 INTRODUCTORY ACTIVITY OVERVIEW This is an introductory assignment for students in a grade 8 history class dealing with the Red River Settlement. LEARNING GOAL AND FOCUSING QUESTION - During this lesson students activate their prior knowledge and connections to gain a deeper understanding of the word Rebellion and what requires to set up a new settlement. CURRICULUM EXPECTATIONS - Interpret and analyse information and evidence relevant to their investigations, using a variety of tools. MATERIALS - There are certain terms students will need to understand within this lesson. They are: 1. Emigrate – to leave one place or country in order to settle in another 2. Lord Selkirk – Scottish born 5th Earl of Selkirk, used his money to buy the Hudson’s Bay Company in order to get land to establish a settlement on the Red River in Rupert’s Land in 1812 3. Red River – a river that flows North Dakota north into Lake Winnipeg 4. Exonerate – to clear or absolve from blame or a criminal charge 5. Hudson’s Bay Company – an English company chartered in 1670 to trade in all parts of North America drained by rivers flowing into Hudson’s Bay 6. North West Company – a fur trading business headquartered in Montréal from 1779 to 1821 which competed, often violently, with the Hudson’s Bay Company until it merged with the Hudson’s Bay Company in 1821 7. Rupert’s Land – the territories granted by Charles II of England to the Hudson’s Bay Company in 1670 and ceded to the Canadian government in 1870 - For research: textbook, computer, dictionaries or whatever you have available to you.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1: Introduction
    AN ANALYSIS OF THE 1875-1877 SCARLET FEVER EPIDEMIC OF CAPE BRETON ISLAND, NOVA SCOTIA ___________________________________________________________ A Dissertation presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School University of Missouri-Columbia ___________________________________________________________ In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy ___________________________________________________________ by JOSEPH MACLEAN PARISH Dr. Lisa Sattenspiel, Dissertation Supervisor DECEMBER 2004 © Copyright by Joseph MacLean Parish 2004 All Rights Reserved Dedication This dissertation is dedicated to the people of Cape Breton and in particular the people of Chéticamp, both past and present. Your enduring spirits, your pioneering efforts and your selfless approach to life stand out amongst all peoples. Without these qualities in you and your ancestors, none of this would have been possible. Acknowledgements I would first like to thank my fiancée Demmarest who has been a constant source of support throughout the process of creating this dissertation and endured my stress with me every step of the way. I will never forget your patience and selflessness. My mother Ginny was a steady source of encouragement and strength since my arrival in Missouri so shortly after the passing of my father. Your love knows no bounds mom. I would also like to thank my close friends who have believed in me throughout my entire academic “career” and supported my choices including, in no particular order, Mickey ‘G’, Alexis Dolphin, Rhonda Bathurst, Michael Pierce, Jason Organ and Ahmed Abu-Dalou. I owe special thanks to my aunt and uncle, Muriel and Earl “Curly” Gray of Sydney, Nova Scotia, and my cousins Wallace, Carole, Crystal and Michelle AuCoin and Auguste Deveaux of Chéticamp, Nova Scotia for being my gracious hosts numerous times throughout the years of my research.
    [Show full text]
  • Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Alberta
    670 ALBERTA v. CUNNINGHAM [2011] 2 S.C.R. Her Majesty The Queen in Right of Alberta Sa Majesté la Reine du chef de l’Alberta (Minister of Aboriginal Affairs and (Ministre des Affaires autochtones et Northern Development) and Registrar, Metis Développement du Nord) et Registraire, Metis Settlements Land Registry Appellants Settlements Land Registry Appelants v. c. Barbara Cunningham, John Kenneth Barbara Cunningham, John Kenneth Cunningham, Lawrent (Lawrence) Cunningham, Lawrent (Lawrence) Cunningham, Ralph Cunningham, Lynn Cunningham, Ralph Cunningham, Lynn Noskey, Gordon Cunningham, Roger Noskey, Gordon Cunningham, Roger Cunningham, Ray Stuart and Peavine Métis Cunningham, Ray Stuart et Peavine Métis Settlement Respondents Settlement Intimés and et Attorney General of Ontario, Attorney Procureur général de l’Ontario, procureur General of Quebec, Attorney General for général du Québec, procureur général de la Saskatchewan, East Prairie Métis Settlement, Saskatchewan, East Prairie Métis Settlement, Elizabeth Métis Settlement, Métis Nation Elizabeth Métis Settlement, Métis Nation of of Alberta, Métis National Council, Métis Alberta, Ralliement national des Métis, Métis Settlements General Council, Aboriginal Settlements General Council, Aboriginal Legal Services of Toronto Inc., Women’s Legal Services of Toronto Inc., Fonds d’action Legal Education and Action Fund, Canadian et d’éducation juridiques pour les femmes, Association for Community Living, Gift Association canadienne pour l’intégration Lake Métis Settlement and Native Women’s communautaire, Gift Lake Métis Settlement Association of Canada Interveners et Association des femmes autochtones du Canada Intervenants Indexed as: Alberta (Aboriginal Affairs and Répertorié : Alberta (Affaires autochtones Northern Development) v. Cunningham et Développement du Nord) c. Cunningham 2011 SCC 37 2011 CSC 37 File No.: 33340.
    [Show full text]
  • General Agreement on 2K? Tariffs and Trade T£%Ûz'%£ Original: English
    ACTION GENERAL AGREEMENT ON 2K? TARIFFS AND TRADE T£%ÛZ'%£ ORIGINAL: ENGLISH CONTRACTING PARTIES The Territorial Application of the General Agreement A PROVISIONAL LIST of Territories to which the Agreement is applied : ADDENDUM Document GATT/CP/l08 contains a comprehensive list of territories to which it is presumed the agreement is being applied by the contracting parties. The first addendum thereto contains corrected entries for Czechoslovakia, Denmark, Finland, Indonesia, Italy, Netherlands, Norway and Sweden. Since that addendum was issued the governments of the countries named below have also replied requesting that the entries concerning them should read as indicated. It will bo appreciated if other governments will notify the Secretariat of their approval of the relevant text - or submit alterations - in order that a revised list may be issued. PART A Territories in respect of which the application of the Agreement has been made effective AUSTRALIA (Customs Territory of Australia, that is the States of New South Wales, Victoria, Queensland, South Australia, Western Australia and Tasmania and the Northern Territory). BELGIUM-LUXEMBOURG (Including districts of Eupen and Malmédy). BELGIAN CONGO RUANDA-URTJimi (Trust Territory). FRANCE (Including Corsica and Islands off the French Coast, the Soar and the principality of Monaco). ALGERIA (Northern Algeria, viz: Alger, Oran Constantine, and the Southern Territories, viz: Ain Sefra, Ghardaia, Touggourt, Saharan Oases). CAMEROONS (Trust Territory). FRENCH EQUATORIAL AFRICA (Territories of Gabon, Middle-Congo, Ubangi»-Shari, Chad.). FRENCH GUIANA (Department of Guiana, including territory of Inini and islands: St. Joseph, Ile Roya, Ile du Diablo). FRENCH INDIA (Pondicherry, Karikal, Yanaon, Mahb.) GATT/CP/l08/Add.2 Pago 2 FRANCE (Cont'd) FRENCH SETTLEMENTS IN OCEANIA (Consisting of Society; Islands, Leeward Islands, Marquozas Archipelago, Tuamotu Archipelago, Gambler Archipelago, Tubuaî Archipelago, Rapa and Clipporton Islands.
    [Show full text]
  • Constitution of Alberta Amendment Act, 1990
    Province of Alberta CONSTITUTION OF ALBERTA AMENDMENT ACT, 1990 Revised Statutes of Alberta 2000 Chapter C-24 Current as of January 1, 2002 © Published by Alberta Queen’s Printer Alberta Queen’s Printer 7th Floor, Park Plaza 10611 - 98 Avenue Edmonton, AB T5K 2P7 Phone: 780-427-4952 Fax: 780-452-0668 E-mail: [email protected] Shop on-line at www.qp.alberta.ca Copyright and Permission Statement Alberta Queen's Printer holds copyright on behalf of the Government of Alberta in right of Her Majesty the Queen for all Government of Alberta legislation. Alberta Queen's Printer permits any person to reproduce Alberta’s statutes and regulations without seeking permission and without charge, provided due diligence is exercised to ensure the accuracy of the materials produced, and Crown copyright is acknowledged in the following format: © Alberta Queen's Printer, 20__.* *The year of first publication of the legal materials is to be completed. Note All persons making use of this document are reminded that it has no legislative sanction. The official Statutes and Regulations should be consulted for all purposes of interpreting and applying the law. CONSTITUTION OF ALBERTA AMENDMENT ACT, 1990 Chapter C-24 Table of Contents 1 Constitution amended 2 Definition 3 Expropriation 4 Exemption from seizure 5 Restriction on Legislative Assembly 6 Application of laws 7 Power to affect Act 8 Repeal WHEREAS the Metis were present when the Province of Alberta was established and they and the land set aside for their use form a unique part of the history and culture
    [Show full text]
  • The Montreal Natural History Society's Survey of Rupert's Land, 1827
    An Extensive and Unknown Portion of the Empire: The Montreal Natural History Society’s Survey of Rupert’s Land, 1827-1830 Geoffrey Robert Little A Thesis in The Department of History Presented in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts (History) at Concordia University Montreal, Quebec, Canada September 2015 © Geoffrey Robert Little, 2015 CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY School of Graduate Studies This is to certify that the thesis prepared By: Geoffrey Robert Little Entitled: An Extensive and Unknown Portion of the Empire: The Montreal Natural History Society’s Survey of Rupert’s Land, 1827-1830 and submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts (History) complies with the regulations of the University and meets the accepted standards with respect to originality and quality. Signed by the final Examining Committee: ____________________ Chair Dr. Andrew Ivaska ____________________ Examiner Dr. Elsbeth Heaman ____________________ Examiner Dr. Ted McCormick ____________________ Supervisor Dr. Gavin Taylor Approved by ____________________________________________ Chair of Department or Graduate Program Director __________2015 _____________________________ Dean of Faculty ABSTRACT An Extensive and Unknown Portion of the Empire: The Montreal Natural History Society’s Survey of Rupert’s Land, 1827-1830 Geoffrey Robert Little Shortly after it was founded in May 1827, the Montreal Natural History Society constituted an Indian Committee to study the “the native inhabitants...and the Natural History of the Interior, and its fitness for the purposes of commerce and agriculture.” The Interior was Rupert’s Land, the territory to the west and the north of Montreal governed by the Hudson’s Bay Company (HBC).
    [Show full text]
  • Making Federalism Through
    University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository Graduate Studies The Vault: Electronic Theses and Dissertations 2013-12-19 Making Federalism through Law: Regulating Socio-economic Challenges of Energy Development, a Case Study of Alberta’s Oil sands and the Regional Municipality of Wood Buffalo Thompson, Chidinma Bernadine Thompson, C. B. (2013). Making Federalism through Law: Regulating Socio-economic Challenges of Energy Development, a Case Study of Alberta’s Oil sands and the Regional Municipality of Wood Buffalo (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Calgary, Calgary, AB. doi:10.11575/PRISM/26816 http://hdl.handle.net/11023/1216 doctoral thesis University of Calgary graduate students retain copyright ownership and moral rights for their thesis. You may use this material in any way that is permitted by the Copyright Act or through licensing that has been assigned to the document. For uses that are not allowable under copyright legislation or licensing, you are required to seek permission. Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY Making Federalism through Law: Regulating Socio-economic Challenges of Energy Development, a Case Study of Alberta’s Oil sands and the Regional Municipality of Wood Buffalo by Chidinma Bernadine Thompson A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENT FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Faculty of Law Calgary, Alberta December 2013 © Chidinma Bernadine Thompson 2013 DEDICATION TO MY ROCK, SWORD AND SHIELD, MY BEST FRIEND, JESUS CHRIST; THIS IS ONLY POSSIBLE BECAUSE YOU SAID SO, THAT THE WORLD MAY KNOW THAT YOU ARE TRUE AND THAT WITH YOU ALL THINGS ARE POSSIBLE.
    [Show full text]
  • Penal Colonization, Territorialization and Border Construction of the Oyapock River
    Dossiê TRACOL, Samuel; HOUTE, Arnaud-Dominique. “Aqui começa o Brasil”: penal colonization, territorialization and border construction of the Oyapock river. 1853-1927 2177-2940 “Aqui começa o Brasil”: penal colonization, territorialization and border construction of the Oyapock river. 1853-1927 https://doi.org/10.4025/dialogos.v24i2.53572 Samuel Tracol https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6725-4414 Université de Guyane, Guyane Française. E-mail: [email protected] Arnaud-Dominique Houte https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2174-9312 Sorbonne Université, France. E-mail: [email protected] “Aqui começa o Brasil”: penal colonization, territorialization and border construction of the Oyapock river. 1853-1927 Abstract: The Oyapock River has been the border between France and Brazil since the Treaty of Bern came to resolve a centuries-old dispute between the two states. Only populated by indigenous communities and a few adventurers, the two banks of the river are untouched by any lasting colonial and national settlement before the second half of the 19th century. Penal colonization is the formula adopted by the two states to fill the "void" of a border to be formalized. The criminal models circulate and are reinterpreted by participating with great intensity in the making of the territory. Key words: Oyapock; Penal Colonies; Frontiers; Territorialization; Modernity. “Aqui começa o Brasil”: colonización penal, territorialización y fronterización del río Oyapock. 1853-1927 Resumen: El río Oyapock ha sido la frontera entre Francia y Brasil desde que el Tratado de Berna resolvió una disputa centenaria entre los dos estados. Solo pobladas por comunidades indígenas y algunos aventureros, las dos orillas de lo río no han sido tocadas por ningún asentamiento colonial y nacional duradero antes de la segunda mitad del siglo XIX.
    [Show full text]