DOCSLIB.ORG

Symposium Degrees of Freedom. Art Programs at Universities

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Symposium Degrees of Freedom. Art Programs at Universities Freiheitsgrade. Kunstprogramme in Universitäten Leuphana University Lüneburg/Germany 16 - 18 November 2011 Universities are sites of research and of teaching. They are sometimes also home to artistic practice. The symposium "Degrees of Freedom. Art Programs at Universities" explores the roles and potentials of art programs at universities, both for artists and for the universities themselves. Experts from different fields and institutional contexts discuss historical examples of specific programs, experiences and incidents from different countries. A particular focus will be placed on the different ways in which the artistic practice is integrated into university structures. The symposium asks, firstly, how universities can foster and support artistic work and how artists can best benefit from the university setting. Secondly, we will discuss the role of artistic practice in the university and explore the potential of art practice for a research and teaching institution. Thirdly, we will be looking at concepts like agency, knowledge, creativity, etc., and debate how their different connotations in art, science, research and teaching can be brought into a fruitful dialogue. – The symposium "Degrees of Freedom" will prepare and inaugurate the new "Leuphana Arts Program" through which Leuphana University will, in the coming years, bring artists into the university. Participants include: Jens Hauser (Ruhr Universität Bochum), Irène Hediger (Swiss Artists-in-Labs, ZhdK Zurich), Sarat Maharaj (Lund University), Pierre Guillet de Monthoux (Copenhagen Business School), Sally-Jane Norman (Attenborough Centre for the Creative Arts, University of Sussex), Susanne Märtens (HBK Braunschweig), Claus Pias, Beate Soentgen, Martin Warnke, Ulf Wuggenig (all Leuphana University Lüneburg), a.o. Moderation: Andreas Broeckmann (Leuphana Arts Program) Supported by the Ministry of Science and Culture of Lower Saxony. Schedule: Wed 16 Nov, 17:00-21:00 Informal Get Together, Introduction, Opening Reception Thu 17 Nov, 09:00-18:00 Symposium, 19:00-21:00 Panel discussion with Sarat Maharaj, followed by LAP inaugural Reception Fri 18 Nov, 09:00-13:00 Symposium, Closing Lunch Participation is free, reservation requested at: <[email protected]> (also for general and accommodation inquiries) Contact Leuphana Universität Lüneburg Leuphana Ars Program Scharnhorststr. 1, Raum C5.225 21335 Lüneburg Tel. +49 4131 677 2204 E-Mail [email protected] Web www.leuphana.de/lap LAP Symposium "Degrees of Freedom" (info status 13 Nov 2011) S. 1/7 Schedule Wednesday 16 November 17:00-21:00 Get Together, Introduction of the participants, Opening Reception Thursday 17 November 09:00 Welcome by Holm Keller, Vice-President of Leuphana University Lüneburg 09:15-13:00 Symposium (statements and discussion) – Andreas Broeckmann (Leuphana Arts Program): Introduction - Art at Universities – Irène Hediger (Swiss Artists-in-Labs, ZhdK Zurich): Think Art - Act Science – Ulf Wuggenig (Leuphana University Lüneburg): Interaction of Art and (Social) Science – Sally-Jane Norman (Attenborough Centre for the Creative Arts, University of Sussex): Values and Traffics Lunch break, optional visit to Kunstraum exhibition space 15:00-18:00 Symposium (statements and discussion) – Jens Hauser (Ruhr Universität Bochum): Epistemological Biomedia - Epistemic Art – Martin Warnke (Leuphana University Lüneburg): Artistic research and researching artworks: What could a pictorial turn mean to research on art? Break 19:00-20:30 Panel discussion "Between or Beyond the Disciplines" with Sarat Maharaj (Lund University) followed by LAP Inaugural Reception Friday 18 November 09:00-13:00 Symposium – Pierre Guillet de Monthoux (Copenhagen Business School): Cities Foundations Studios. Spaces of Art & Management Encounters – Susanne Märtens (HBK Braunschweig): Art and the Production of Knowledge - Perspectives for Art Academies Closing discussion LAP Symposium "Degrees of Freedom" (info status 13 Nov 2011) S. 2/7 Biographies and Abstracts Andreas Broeckmann Andreas Broeckmann is an art historian and curator who lives in Berlin and Lüneburg. He is Director of the new Leuphana Arts Program at Leuphana Universität Lüneburg. He was the Founding Director of the Dortmunder U - Centre for Art and Creativity (2009-2011) and has curated exhibitions and festivals in major European venues, incl. transmediale and ISEA2010 RUHR. He holds a PhD in Art History from the University of East Anglia, Norwich/UK, and lectures internationally about the history of modern art, media theory, machine aesthetics, and digital culture. Pierre Guillet de Monthoux Pierre Guillet de Monthoux is a professor of Management Philosophy and head of the Department for Management, Politics and Philosophy at Copenhagen Business School in Denmark. He is also working in Switzerland, Germany, Finland, Sweden and Italy and does research in the area of integrating Art and Management education and practice. He currently works on bridging humanities and liberal arts into business education by exploring aesthetic philosophies and practices. Pierre has double French and Swedish citizenships and lives in Denmark and France. Cities Foundations Studios; Spaces of Art & Management Encounters. After a theoretical and empirical research into art management overlaps, I embarked on the adventure of a Nomadic University. This project came out the debates in the European Cultural Parliament and has explored places where art, economy and management meet. each year Nomads have been visiting three Oasis and in between experienced several Mirages. We have listed spaces in Cities, Foundations and Studios where learning and experimenting can tap the sources of aesthetics. Now we use the experience to fuel our research and education at CBS in Denmark. Let's look a bit at our road movie... Jens Hauser Jens Hauser is a Paris-based curator, author and arts and culture critic. With a background in Media Studies and Science Journalism, he focuses on the interactions between art and technology, as well as on trans-genre and contextual aesthetics. He has curated exhibitions such as L’Art Biotech (Nantes, 2003), Still, Living (Perth, 2007), sk-interfaces (Liverpool, 2008/Luxembourg, 2009), the Article Biennale (Stavanger, 2008), Transbiotics (Riga 2010), Fingerprints... (Berlin, 2011) and Synth-ethic (Wien, 2011). Hauser organizes interdisciplinary conferences and guest lectures at universities and international art academies. In his current research at Ruhr-Universität Bochum, he investigates the biomediality and wetware paradigms. Hauser is also a founding collaborator of the European culture channel ARTE and has produced numerous radio features. Epistemological Biomedia – Epistemic Art Linking artistic to academic research can produce epistemic art forms beyond mere aesthetic representation of scientific concepts. This may occur especially when artists interdisciplinarily employ or subvert techno-scientific apparatuses and experimental systems by pointing to the blind spots in knowledge production and to embedded cultural metaphors in research practices, LAP Symposium "Degrees of Freedom" (info status 13 Nov 2011) S. 3/7 therefore feeding back into manifold academic disciplines. As a case study, the artistic use of biomedia as means of expression provides fruitful examples of such interdisciplinary contamination. Such projects pave the way for seeing biotechnologies as media in a broader sense, deriving from the origin of this term in physics and biology and going beyond the digital age’s understanding of media functions of the transmitting, storing and processing of information or audiovisual data. Further on, they raise questions about the economy, ecology and sustainability, and help reveal historical lines such as illusionism or indexicality in unusual and fruitful ways. In such art, mediation and technologies are no longer employed merely to achieve an aesthetic effect, but rather are fully-integrated elements of the aesthetic idiom. Therefore, biomedia projects are good examples for trans-disciplinary challenges beyond a purely hermeneutic or image-based approach. Irène Hediger Irène Hediger is Co-Director of the Swiss artists-in-labs (artistsinlabs.ch) program at the Institute for Cultural Studies in the Arts (ICS) at the Zurich University of the Arts and curator of the travelling exhibition Think Art – Act Science (thinkartactscience.com). After her studies in business administration, she received a degree in organizational development and group dynamics (DAGG) and a Master of Advanced Studies in Cultural Management at the University of Basel. She specializes in interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary creative processes and practices and in the development of inclusive and participatory outreach concepts. Susanne Märtens Susanne Märtens works as Academic Staff at the Hochschule für Bildende Künste Braunschweig (Academy of Fine Arts) in the Institute of Art History and Theory, as well as in the Institutes of Art Communication Design and Industrial Design. She worked as the head of Visitor Services at documenta 12, Quadriennale 2006 and at the Henri Matisse exhibition (2006) at K20 Kunstsammlung Nordrhein Westfalen/Düsseldorf, and as an assistant to Berlin-based artist Adrian Piper. She taught at the art academies of Dresden and Braunschweig, and at Humboldt University. Studied Art History and Comparative Religious Studies at Free University Berlin and at the Courtauld Institute in London. Publications a.o. on caricature
Recommended publications
  • Herbert Hrachovec , Alois Pichler (Eds.) Philosophy of the Information Society

    Herbert Hrachovec , Alois Pichler (Eds.) Philosophy of the Information Society

    Herbert Hrachovec , Alois Pichler (Eds.) Philosophy of the Information Society Publications of the Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society. New Series Volume 7 Herbert Hrachovec • Alois Pichler (Eds.) Philosophy of the Information Society Proceedings of the 30. International Ludwig Wittgenstein Symposium Kirchberg am Wechsel, Austria 2007 Volume 2 Bibliographic information published by Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliographie; detailed bibliographic data is available in the Internet at http://dnb.ddb.de Gedruckt mit Förderung des Bundesministeriums für Wissenschaft und Forschung in Wien und der Kulturabteilung der NÖ Landesregierung North and South America by Transaction Books Rutgers University Piscataway, NJ 08854-8042 [email protected] United Kingdom, Ire, Iceland, Turkey, Malta, Portugal by Gazelle Books Services Limited White Cross Mills Hightown LANCASTER, LA1 4XS [email protected] Livraison pour la France et la Belgique: Librairie Philosophique J.Vrin 6, place de la Sorbonne ; F-75005 PARIS Tel. +33 (0)1 43 54 03 47 ; Fax +33 (0)1 43 54 48 18 www.vrin.fr 2008 ontos verlag P.O. Box 15 41, D-63133 Heusenstamm www.ontosverlag.com ISBN 978-3-86838-002-6 2008 No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in retrieval systems or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, microfilming, recording or otherwise without written permission from the Publisher, with the exception of any material supplied specifically
  • Intellectual History of the Cold

    Intellectual History of the Cold

    Intellectual History of the Cold War Seventh international conference in the series “Between ‘Total War’ and ‘Small Wars’: Studies in the Societal History of the Cold War” Convenors: Bernd Greiner, Tim B. Müller, Dierk Walter, Claudia Weber Hamburg Institute for Social Research, Hamburg, Germany 1–3 September 2010 Tuesday, 31 August 2010 7 p.m. Reception at the Institute Wednesday, 1 September 2010 9:30 a.m. Opening Remarks 10:00 a.m. Panel 1 The Mobilization of Knowledge I: The Political-Academic Complex Chair: Tim B. Müller Rebecca S. Lowen (Metropolitan State University, St. Paul, MN): Mobilizing Science: The American Political-Academic Nexus Alexei Kojevnikov (University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC): The Cold-War Mobilization of Science in the Soviet Union 11:00 a.m. Coffee Break 11:30 a.m. John Krige (Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA): Co-producing Knowledge for Leadership: Towards a Transnational History of American Science and Technology in the Cold War Perrin Selcer (University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA): Soft Science in Hard Times: Unesco, World Citizenship, and the Cold War 12:30 p.m. Panel 2 The Mobilization of Knowledge II: Think Tanks, Government Institutions, Enemy Experts Chair: Bernd Greiner Ron Robin (New York University, New York, NY): Economics and History in the Thermonuclear Age: Albert Wohlstetter’s RAND Years Philip Rocco (University of California, Berkeley, CA): The Organizational Roots of Analytical Innovation: Forging Cold War Policy Science at the RAND Corporation 1:30 p.m. Lunch Break 3 p.m. David C. Engerman (Brandeis University, Waltham, MA): Knowing Allies and Enemies: The World War II Origins of Area Studies in American Universities Vladislav Zubok (Temple University, Philadelphia, PA): Soviet Experts on the West in the Cold War 1 4 p.m.
  • Saturday 26 September Friday 25 September

    Saturday 26 September Friday 25 September

    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by University of Lincoln Institutional Repository Final Programme as of September 22th, 2009 3rd Vienna Games Conference – Future and Reality of Gaming – F.R.O.G. 2009 "Exploring the Edge of Gaming" Vienna, Austria, Friday 25 to Sunday 27 September 2009 Friday 25 September Track A / Wappensaal Track B / Top317 11:30 REGISTRATION 13:00 FROG Opening Austrian Federal Ministry of Economy, Family and Youth Christa Schnabl (Vice Rector for Student Affairs and Connuing Educaon, University of Vienna) Claus Pias (University of Vienna) 13:30 Keynote: Cheryl K. Olson Massachuses General Hospital Department of Psychiatry, USA "What Young People Learn From Electronic Games, and Their Role in Healthy Development" 14:30 Mini‐Break 14:40 Slot 1/A: Dorothée Hefner (Hannover), Christoph Klimmt (Mainz), Ralf Slot 1/B*: Christoph Kaindel (Vienna), Ilja Steffelbauer (Vienna) Thalemann (Berlin), Verena Pompetzki, Jenny Czolkoss (Hannover), GER Civilizaons, Invenons and Empires. Implizite Geschichts‐ und Gamers behind the Edge: Exploring Reasons to Play in Adolescents treated Gesellschastheorien in Computerspielen for Excessive Video Game Use 15:20 Slot 2/A Ben Kirman, Conor Linehan and Shaun Lawson (Lincoln, UK) Slot 2/B* Sigrid Jones (Vienna) Exploring the Edge of Good Taste: Playful Misconduct in Social Games Playing with Flickr: Breaking the magic circle 16:00 Break 16:30 Slot 3/A*: Judith Ackermann (Bonn, GER) Slot 3/B: Elke Hemminger (Gmünd, GER) Kommunikave Herausforderungen des gemeinschalichen Computerspiels Fantasy Facebook? Merged Gameplay in MMORPGs as Social Networking am Beispiel von LAN‐Partys Acvies 17:10 Slot 4/A*: Regina Friess (Berlin, GER) Slot 4/B: Marek Buzinkay (Leeds, UK) Spielen im Grenzgebiet des klassischen Gamings: Eine Untersuchung zur You don’t want to look like a newbie.
  • Early Digital Images a Praxeology of the Display

    Early Digital Images a Praxeology of the Display

    Tristan Thielmann Early Digital Images A Praxeology of the Display The digital image is non-existent. If anything is respon- attempts to re-introduce the separation between image and sible for missing the point here, then it is inappropriate image carrier, in order to make a statement on the specific essentialism. What there are, are innumerable analog properties of digitally generated pictorial worlds. By shed- images that illustrate the data that are present in a dig- ding light on the historical and, simultaneously, the prac- ital form: on monitors, televisions or paper, on movie tice-theoretical contribution of the display in the discourse screens, displays and so on.1 on digital imagery, we can show that the scientific reflec- tion on images in general has been unfoundedly loaded with meaning in the truest sense of the word. Shedding Light The “material turn” 4 that is currently being diagnosed Media studies have postulated consistently that digital in the analysis of digital media practices as well as the dis- images do not exist.2 This has not prevented the visual course on “soft images” 5 reveals that we are increasingly studies and arts from continuing with the attempt at pro- dealing with dynamic, transparent and malleable displays claiming a phenomenology of images that refuses to negate adapting themselves to the individual user, context and sit- their digital transformation or even origin.3 The fact that uation. This raises the question as to what contribution a we perceive images on digital displays has led to an analyt- practice theory can make toward conclusive media esthetics, ical imprecision in the development of theory in the visual media history and a media theory of the display.
  • Agent Cultures and Zombielands. Fields, Fictions and Futures of Agent-Based Modeling and Simulation

    Agent Cultures and Zombielands. Fields, Fictions and Futures of Agent-Based Modeling and Simulation

    // MECS // Annual Conference 2016 // AGENT CULTURES AND ZOMBIELANDS. FIELDS, FICTIONS AND FUTURES OF AGENT-BASED MODELING AND SIMULATION SHORT ABSTRACT The MECS 2016 Annual Conference Agent Cultures and Zombielands explores the epistemological impact and the mediatechnological conditions of Agent-based Modeling and Simulation (ABM). Today, ABM ranges from infrastructure models for production sequences, administrative processes, warehousing, transport and traffic, and communication networks, to the simulation of social systems like animal collectives, pedestrian motion, urban studies, crowd management, evacuation studies, epidemiology, and financial markets, up to integrative Global Scale Agent Models. Agent-based Modeling and Simulation share a paradigm of distributed control among multiple autonomous and lifelike agents. The rise of ABM implies a conception and specification of (artificial) sociality. The MECS 2016 Annual Conference Agent Cultures and Zombielands will examine this particular dimension of sociality in ABM from a transdisciplinary perspective, conveying scholars from computer science, social science, and media studies. General questions touch on the verisimilitude of ‘lifelike’ behavior. They ask about the conceptual ingredients of the ‘sociality’ in social simulations. And they inquire how social simulations, vice versa, might have been impregnated sociological and political notions of ‘the social’. CONFERENCE DATES Thursday, June 23rd – Saturday, June 25th, 2016 MECS Media Cultures of Computer Simulation Wallstr. 3 21335 Lüneburg Tel.: +49 (0) 4131 2197 819 E-Mail: [email protected] Homepage: www.mecs.leuphana.de CONFERENCE VENUE ACCOMODATION Freiraum Lüneburg Hotel Altes Kaufhaus, Kaufhausstraße 5, Salzstraße 1 21335 Lüneburg 21335 Lüneburg Tel.: +49 (0) 4131 3088-0 Tel.: +49 (0) 4131 8201 750 Fax: +49 (0) 4131 3088-259 E-Mail: [email protected] E-Mail: [email protected] Homepage: www.alteskaufhaus.de / MECS // Annual Conference 2016 // PROGRAM Thursday Friday Saturday 9.30 10.00 Thomas Schelling and James M.
  • 110 Max Bense and Joseph Beuys in Discussion, Düsseldorf, 1970

    110 Max Bense and Joseph Beuys in Discussion, Düsseldorf, 1970

    Max Bense and Joseph Beuys in discussion, Düsseldorf, 1970. 110 Downloaded from http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/grey.2007.1.29.110 by guest on 30 September 2021 “Hollerith ‘Feathered Crystal’”: Art, Science, and Computing in the Era of Cybernetics CLAUS PIAS TRANSLATED BY PETER KRAPP But a theory of how the intellectual is expected to exist in this world that is perfected for the worker—we do not have such a theory. —Max Bense1 I believe computer screens can make people happier. —Ted Nelson2 I “Hollerith ‘feathered crystal’”—this elliptical and monumental entry appears in the middle of Max Bense’s Programming the Beautiful. “Everything else,” he continues with lapidary brevity, “has been said.”3 Full stop, paragraph. At issue: what an aesthetic text can be in the year 1960, and why it is what it is. His answer: “Methodic poetry . : language recurring to logic and statis- tics, compressed texts, left to a constraint or an accident, entrusted with the generative process, discrediting emotional and desirous projects. That is the only way to approach a new being.”4 This new being, an anthropology on the horizon of cybernetics and digital calculation was figured as the big challenge to the modern arts and sciences. This essay discusses a path for European media theory that Bense eventually chose not to take. As a result of Bense’s decision, information aesthetics, a program for art with the capability to subvert the classical dis- tinctions of the “two cultures” of hard science and the humanities, never took hold in the universities, thus falling to the same fate as the cybernetics from which it is derived.
  • Early Digital Images. a Praxeology of the Display 2018

    Early Digital Images. a Praxeology of the Display 2018

    Repositorium für die Medienwissenschaft Tristan Thielmann Early Digital Images. A Praxeology of the Display 2018 https://doi.org/10.25969/mediarep/12197 Veröffentlichungsversion / published version Sammelbandbeitrag / collection article Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Thielmann, Tristan: Early Digital Images. A Praxeology of the Display. In: Luisa Feiersinger, Kathrin Friedrich, Moritz Queisner (Hg.): Image – Action – Space: Situating the Screen in Visual Practice. Berlin: de Gruyter 2018, S. 41– 54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25969/mediarep/12197. Erstmalig hier erschienen / Initial publication here: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110464979-004 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer Creative Commons - This document is made available under a creative commons - Namensnennung - Nicht kommerziell - Keine Bearbeitungen 4.0 Attribution - Non Commercial - No Derivatives 4.0 License. For Lizenz zur Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu dieser Lizenz more information see: finden Sie hier: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 Tristan Thielmann Early Digital Images A Praxeology of the Display The digital image is non-existent. If anything is respon- attempts to re-introduce the separation between image and sible for missing the point here, then it is inappropriate image carrier, in order to make a statement on the specific essentialism. What there are, are innumerable analog properties of digitally generated pictorial worlds. By shed- images that illustrate the data that are present in a dig- ding light on the historical and, simultaneously, the prac- ital form: on monitors, televisions or paper, on movie tice-theoretical contribution of the display in the discourse screens, displays and so on.1 on digital imagery, we can show that the scientific reflec- tion on images in general has been unfoundedly loaded with meaning in the truest sense of the word.
  • Abstracts and Biographies

    Abstracts and Biographies

    Abstracts and Biographies 307 THOMAS BARTSCHERER, PAOLO D’IORIO, Philosophy in an Evolving Web: Necessary Conditions, Web Technologies, and the Discovery Project This article considers how digital technology—and in particular recent innovations in networking and Semantic Web—can be exploited to assist scholars in conducting academic research while at the same time minimi- zing the risks posed by web-mediated scholarship. We argue that an clear understanding of how humanities scholarship has traditionally been struc- tured and practiced is a prerequisite for the success of any large-scale di- gital humanities initiative, and we therefore attempt to articulate what we have identified as the conditions necessary for the possibility of scholarship, conditions which are independent of any given technology. We discuss the following five conditions: stability, accessibility, durability, dissemination, and standards of quality. We then turn to a detailed look at the Discovery Project, recently launched under the aegis of the European Union’s eCon- tentplus programme, to consider if and how the project meets the conditions specified. We conclude by noting three major challenges that confront this project and all similar initiatives aimed at integrating humanities research and digital technology. THOMAS BARTSCHERER is completing a doctoral thesis at the University of Chicago’s Committee on Social Thought and is Associate Director of the Language and Thinking program at Bard College in New York, where he also teaches in the Humanities. He is co-editor of Switching Codes, a coll- ection of essays on the impact of digital technology on thought and practice in the arts and the humanities (University of Chicago Press, forthcoming) and has co-edited Erotikon: Essay on Eros, Ancient and Modern (University of Chicago Press, 2005).
  • On the Utopian Qualities of Technology, Cybernetics, and Participation in the Gdr of the Late 1960S

    On the Utopian Qualities of Technology, Cybernetics, and Participation in the Gdr of the Late 1960S

    Introduction Countercultures Ideologies and Practices Alternative Visions NETWORKS: ON THE UTOPIAN QUALITIES OF TECHNOLOGY, CYBERNETICS, AND PARTICIPATION IN THE GDR OF THE LATE 1960S Oliver Sukrow The Marxist-Leninist Organizational Theory investigates the laws, principles, methods, and models valid in all areas of the developed Socialist system for the rational organiza- tion of systems and the processes of planning and manage- ment that take place in them and between them with the aim of achieving the highest eff ectiveness of the systems.1 1 Bundesarchiv (BArch), Introduction: Towards the Future? Computer, Science, and DY 30-IV A 2/9.09/92, Socialism Parteihochschule “Karl Marx” beim ZK der Nearly fi ft y years ago, on October 7, 1969, the German Democratic SED, Forschungen zur Arbeitsorganisation, Republic (GDR) celebrated it twentieth anniversary. Art exhibitions in Ergebnisse der every “Bezirkshauptstadt” (district capital), political demonstrations, Forschungsarbeit der Parteihochschule, Bd. 5, concerts, and festivals in the capital of Berlin were intended to gener- Oktober-Dezember ate an optimistic atmosphere. While the state Socialist Unity Party 1970, Studie: “Die marxistisch-leninistische (SED) looked back at twenty years of existence, the perspective into Organisationswissenschaft the future was described in the brightest colors: “The GDR — that is und einige Probleme ihrer Anwendung in 2 the modern, Socialist German state that owns the future.” Tirelessly, der wissenschaft lichen the leadership of the SED under Walter Ulbricht promoted the idea Fü hrungstätigkeit der Partei,” 113 pages, 22. that the transformation of the Socialist system towards Communism would be achieved under its rule. In this deterministic conception, 2 Walter Ulbricht, “Bilanz und Ausblick am 20.
  • 110 Max Bense and Joseph Beuys in Discussion, Düsseldorf, 1970

    110 Max Bense and Joseph Beuys in Discussion, Düsseldorf, 1970

    Max Bense and Joseph Beuys in discussion, Düsseldorf, 1970. 110 “Hollerith ‘Feathered Crystal’”: Art, Science, and Computing in the Era of Cybernetics CLAUS PIAS TRANSLATED BY PETER KRAPP But a theory of how the intellectual is expected to exist in this world that is perfected for the worker—we do not have such a theory. —Max Bense1 I believe computer screens can make people happier. —Ted Nelson2 I “Hollerith ‘feathered crystal’”—this elliptical and monumental entry appears in the middle of Max Bense’s Programming the Beautiful. “Everything else,” he continues with lapidary brevity, “has been said.”3 Full stop, paragraph. At issue: what an aesthetic text can be in the year 1960, and why it is what it is. His answer: “Methodic poetry . : language recurring to logic and statis- tics, compressed texts, left to a constraint or an accident, entrusted with the generative process, discrediting emotional and desirous projects. That is the only way to approach a new being.”4 This new being, an anthropology on the horizon of cybernetics and digital calculation was figured as the big challenge to the modern arts and sciences. This essay discusses a path for European media theory that Bense eventually chose not to take. As a result of Bense’s decision, information aesthetics, a program for art with the capability to subvert the classical dis- tinctions of the “two cultures” of hard science and the humanities, never took hold in the universities, thus falling to the same fate as the cybernetics from which it is derived. Cybernetics is less a discipline than an episte- mology; it becomes activated within disciplines.