Thesis a Context-Specific Social
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
THESIS A CONTEXT-SPECIFIC SOCIAL NORMS INTERVENTION TO REDUCE COLLEGE STUDENT ALCOHOL USE: MANIPULATING REFERENCE GROUPS TO TARGET TAILGATING STUDENTS Submitted by Amber M. Anthenien Department of Psychology In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the Degree of Master of Science Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado Spring 2015 Master’s Committee: Advisor: Patricia Aloise-Young Kimberly Henry Jennifer Cross Copyright by Amber Maree Anthenien 2015 All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT A CONTEXT-SPECIFIC SOCIAL NORMS INTERVENTION TO REDUCE COLLEGE STUDENT ALCOHOL USE: MANIPULATING REFERENCE GROUPS TO TARGET TAILGATING STUDENTS Alcohol use among college students may result in a variety of ill effects for students and their community. The social norms approach is commonly employed to address these issues, targeting individuals’ perceptions of normative consumption. However, normative interventions have rarely been implemented in specific situations or contexts that encourage alcohol consumption, when college students need prevention programming the most. Moreover, researchers have often ignored the important gender differences that exist in alcohol use by providing gender-neutral norms. In the current investigation, a randomized controlled trial was conducted in the Fall of 2013 with three experimental conditions: a no-treatment control, a context-specific social norm intervention, and a combined context-specific and gender-specific social norm intervention. Psychology students (N = 216, Mage = 19.11, 72.6% female) were exposed to one of the experimental conditions and completed pre-test assessments online 48 hours prior to the football game they intended to tailgate, and then responded to follow-up measures within 7 days after the football game. Results indicate that the combined intervention may be a promising technique for reducing college students’ perceived norms and alcohol consumption in tailgating situations. Specifically, students in the combined condition perceived their peers drank less alcohol while tailgating. In addition, females in the context and combined conditions reported consuming less alcohol than participants in the control group. However, due ii to small sample sizes in the present study, these effects failed to reach conventional levels of statistical significance. The implications for designing effective normative interventions are discussed. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT .................................................................................................................................... ii LIST OF TABLES ......................................................................................................................... vi LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................................... vii Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Social norm interventions ............................................................................................................... 1 Social comparison theory ........................................................................................................ 4 Pluralistic ignorance ................................................................................................................ 5 Elements of social norms interventions .......................................................................................... 6 Social norms theory ........................................................................................................................ 6 Descriptive and injunctive norms ................................................................................................... 6 Reference groups ............................................................................................................................ 9 Context and event-specific social norms ...................................................................................... 11 Forms of social norms interventions ............................................................................................. 13 The social norm debate .......................................................................................................... 14 Media campaigns. .............................................................................................................. 16 Face-to-face feedback. ....................................................................................................... 18 Mailed feedback. ................................................................................................................ 18 Web-based feedback. ......................................................................................................... 19 The “sports fan” ............................................................................................................................ 20 Environmental predictors of sporting event consumption ..................................................... 21 Personal predictors of sporting event consumption ............................................................... 22 The Current Research ................................................................................................................... 24 Method .......................................................................................................................................... 26 Participants .................................................................................................................................... 26 Procedures ..................................................................................................................................... 27 Interventions ................................................................................................................................. 28 Measures ....................................................................................................................................... 29 Typical drinking. ................................................................................................................... 29 Game day drinking. ............................................................................................................... 30 iv Best friends’ drinking. ........................................................................................................... 30 Perceived norms. ................................................................................................................... 30 Perceived credibility. ............................................................................................................. 30 Drinking intentions. ............................................................................................................... 31 Plans for the event. ................................................................................................................ 31 Public self-consciousness. ..................................................................................................... 32 Exposure to other alcohol programming. .............................................................................. 32 Greek membership. ................................................................................................................ 33 Intentions to tailgate. ............................................................................................................. 33 Intentions to complete follow-up. .......................................................................................... 34 Analytic Strategy .......................................................................................................................... 35 Modeling count data ..................................................................................................................... 35 Model testing ................................................................................................................................ 35 Results ........................................................................................................................................... 38 Descriptive Statistics ..................................................................................................................... 38 Inferential Results ......................................................................................................................... 40 Moderation of gender .................................................................................................................... 41 Discussion ..................................................................................................................................... 43 Conclusions ................................................................................................................................... 48 References ..................................................................................................................................... 60 v LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Frequency Distributions for Game Day Alcohol Consumption by Gender.................... 49 Table 2. Game Day Drinking Rates and Proportions of Abstainers in each Experimental Condition....................................................................................................................................... 50 Table 3. Drinkers' Game Day Drinking Rates in