SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Supplementary Information DOI: 10.1038/NGEO1481

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Supplementary Information DOI: 10.1038/NGEO1481 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Supplementary information DOI: 10.1038/NGEO1481 An aerial view of 80 years of climate-related glacier fluctuations in southeast Greenland Anders A. Bjørk1*, Kurt H. Kjær1, Niels J. Korsgaard1, Shfaqat A. Khan2, Kristian K. Kjeldsen1, Camilla S. Andresen3, Jason E. Box4,5, Nicolaj K. Larsen6 and Svend Funder1 1Centre for GeoGenetics, Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark 2DTU Space - National Space Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Department of Geodesy, Copenhagen, Denmark. 3Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland, Department of Marine Geology and Glaciology, Copenhagen, Denmark. 4Department of Geography, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA 5Byrd Polar Research Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA 6Department of Geocience, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark *e-mail: [email protected] 1. Data 2. Methods 2.1 Image selection strategy 2.2 1981/1985 Digital Elevation Models and ortho-mosaics 2.3 Ortho-mosaics from 1981 and 1985 aerial photos 2.4 Control of the imagery 2.5 Digitization and error assessment 2.6 Glacier length measurements 2.7 Land-terminating elevation change 2.8 Regional differentiation and glacier subdivision 3. Additional climate data 4. Results 4.1 List of measured glaciers 4.2 Supplementary regional changes 4.3 Mid-Century advance 4.4 Unknown time of exposure for “1943” images 5. Supplementary information references 1 NATURE GEOSCIENCE | www.nature.com/naturegeoscience 1 © 2012 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved. 1. Data 1932/1933 Imagery Images were recorded primarily for cartography during the 7th Thule Expedition to southeast Greenland, led by the Danish/Greenlandic scientist and explorer Knud Rasmussen. After topographic maps were produced, the images were classified and archived in a citadel on the outskirts of Copenhagen. Some of the aerial images had been published after the expedition25 and in the official report of the expedition26. Besides these images, the data have remained unexplored until recently rediscovered in Copenhagen. Figure S1. Photo positions and examples of aerial oblique images recorded during the 7th Thule Expedition. Image A is taken from the side of the aircraft with a low shooting angle at an altitude of 3700 meters. Image B is a tail-shot from 3300 meters with a higher shooting angle – the glacier depicted is the Thrym Glacier (1700 m wide) in the inner part of Skjoldungen Fjord (63°33’N; 41°45’W).The markings on the upper image are from geodesists generating the maps from the original images. The aerial images recorded during the 7th Thule Expedition (Fig. S1) fall into two categories: a series of flight lines recorded at 4,000 meters altitude off the coast towards land, and a series of tail images shot 2 © 2012 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved. backwards relative to the direction of flight altitudes between 2,500 – 3,500 m. The set of tail flight lines are shot with a larger inclination, thereby more applicable for mapping purposes. The images are of varying quality, with the earliest recordings generally being the poorest. Many images were discarded due to poor quality. During the first year of flying in 1932 the technology and environment was new to the operators, and many film rolls are useless due to over exposure25. We have used images from the 1932 series, which are of high contrast, and the remaining images are from the 1933 campaign. Contact prints of the images have been scanned at 600 DPI; this resolution has proven sufficient to recognize all details from the prints. 1933 Terrestrial Imagery Due to the rough ice - and sailing conditions off the southeast coast of Greenland - very few historical terrestrial oblique images are available. From the historic expeditions few photographs were recorded and even fewer containing glaciers which can be geo located today. Five glaciers in the northern part of the study area have had their 1933 positions established based on terrestrial images recorded during The 7th Thule Expedition by Knud Rasmussen (Fig. S2). The work was an independent project carried out by the geologist Keld Milthers25, who’s results were not published. Five Land-terminating glaciers were recorded with a high precision photogrammetric camera for the purpose of measuring summer ablation. The glacier margins have been reestablished after revisiting the glaciers during the summer of 2010. Figure S2. Terrestrial images recorded in 1933 (left) and 2010 (right) from a Land-terminating glacier northeast of Tasiilaq (65°58’N; 35°51’W). During the 77 year period the glacier has retreated 1.7 km. Photo: Kjeld Milthers & Niels J. Korsgaard. From the exact 1933 camera positions new images were recorded (Fig. S2, right). This work was primarily done in order to create new 2010 digital elevation models and measure mass loss. In this study only results from the front positions have been used. Other examples of terrestrial images exist, however, at these sites aerial images from the same period and with a better resolution have been used instead. 3 © 2012 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved. 1931 Images The images from the British Arctic Air Route Expedition (BAARE) from 1931 (Fig. S3) are used to fill in the blanks where no suitable images from the 7th Thule Expedition are available. This is primarily the coastline from Umivik to the beginning of Sermilik Fjord, where no tail-images were acquired during the 7th Thule Expedition. The images from the 1931 survey are all oblique photos recorded with a handheld camera from the airplane. The main objective of the survey was to investigate the area for a potential landing strip, leaving less attention to glacierized areas45. The angle of the recordings and the distance to the ice margin varies greatly from close-ups of glacier fronts to coverage of entire regions. Figure S3. Examples of images recorded during BAARE in 1931. Recorded with a handheld camera, the angle and distance to the ice vary. Left is the inner part of Johan Petersen Fjord (66°00’N; 38°25’W), right is a local ice cap on the southern part of Jens Munks Ø (64°29’N; 40°17’W). Photos are courtesy of Scott Polar Research Institute. The BAARE photos were provided in digital form from the Scott Polar Research Institute, with a resolution of c. 300 DPI. A number of the images have been scanned at 1200 DPI resolution from the negatives with little influence in the final precision. 4 © 2012 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved. 1943 Images Figure S4. Position of the photos recorded during World War II, example from Thrym Glacier (1700 m wide) in the inner part of Skjoldungen Fjord (63°33’N; 41°45’W) During the 2nd World War an intensive photo campaign took place by the U.S. military. A large number of aerial photos were recorded throughout the coasts of Greenland (Fig. S4). The vertical photos were recorded in scale 1:40,000. The film rolls were handed over to the Danish National Survey and Cadastre after the war. Records of the photo campaign are elusive on when the flights took place, as the precise dates and camera details are no longer available. The best estimate is that these photos were recorded in the second half of the war. The registration cards at the archive of the Danish National Cadastre and Survey associated with these flight lines have the year “1943” and “1943?” noted on them, hence 1943 has also been the year used in this study. The true age of these images is still being investigated both in Denmark, and in the U.S. The implications of a possible incorrect year for our results and main conclusions are discussed in section 4.4. All 1943 vertical photos were scanned from the contact prints at 600 dpi, resulting in a ground resolution of c. 2 m. 5 © 2012 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved. 1965 Images Recently unclassified US intelligence satellite images from the Corona program covering the southeast Greenland coast line have been used (Fig. S5). The images were provided in digital form scanned on a photogrammetric precision-scanner at 7 µm from the original negatives from the U.S. Geological Survey. The camera model used for all images was the J-1 stereo photogrammetric camera with a ground resolution of less than 0.61 m46. Figure S5. Detail from the declassified Corona satellite recorded in 1965, with the Fenris Glacier in the inner part of Sermilik Fjord (66°21’N; 37°30W). 6 © 2012 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved. 1981 and 1985 photos Figure S6. The compilation of aerial imagery from 1981 and 1985 presented as blocks of ortho-rectified mosaics. The 650 km coastline is divided into sections to make file sizes manageable. Cut-out from Ikertivaq Bay (65°32’N; 39°56’W) comprised of six different vertical aerial photos. Vertical aerial photos from 1981 and 1985 (Fig. S6) covering the entire coast have been used. Flights were conducted in summer from late June to early August, and mages were recorded from an altitude of 13,000 meters to a scale of 1:150,000. The photos are part of a larger collection of images covering the entire ice-free parts of Greenland 1978-1987, processed at the Palaeoclimate-Quaternary Group of the Centre for GeoGenetics, Natural History Museum of Denmark. The 1981 and 1985 scale 1:150,000 photos have been aero-triangulated to the GR96 reference system, and have been used to produce a DEM which is the basis for a series of orthorectified mosaics (Fig. S6). These ortho-mosaics with a 4 m ground resolution are used as the 1981/85-data and serve as the horizontal reference for rectification of all other imagery in this study.
Recommended publications
  • Measures Greenland Ice Velocity: Selected Glacier Site Velocity Maps from Optical Images, Version 1
    MEaSURES Greenland Ice Velocity: Selected Glacier Site Velocity Maps from Optical Images, Version 1 USER GUIDE How to Cite These Data As a condition of using these data, you must include a citation: Howat, I. 2016. MEaSURES Greenland Ice Velocity: Selected Glacier Site Velocity Maps from Optical Images, Version 1. [Indicate subset used]. Boulder, Colorado USA. NASA National Snow and Ice Data Center Distributed Active Archive Center. https://doi.org/10.5067/EYV1IP7MUNSV. [Date Accessed]. FOR QUESTIONS ABOUT THESE DATA, CONTACT [email protected] FOR CURRENT INFORMATION, VISIT https://nsidc.org/data/nsidc-0646 USER GUIDE: MEaSURES Greenland Ice Velocity: Selected Glacier Site Velocity Maps from Optical Images, Version 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 DATA DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................................. 2 1.1 Parameters ............................................................................................................................................ 2 1.1.1 Parameter Description ................................................................................................................. 2 1.2 File Information ...................................................................................................................................... 2 1.2.1 Format.......................................................................................................................................... 2 1.2.2 Directory Structure ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Helheim Glacier Terminus of More Than 3.8 M W.Eq
    Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | The Cryosphere Discuss., 4, 1195–1224, 2010 The Cryosphere www.the-cryosphere-discuss.net/4/1195/2010/ Discussions TCD doi:10.5194/tcd-4-1195-2010 4, 1195–1224, 2010 © Author(s) 2010. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Freshwater flux to This discussion paper is/has been under review for the journal The Cryosphere (TC). Sermilik Fjord, Please refer to the corresponding final paper in TC if available. SE Greenland S. H. Mernild et al. Freshwater flux to Sermilik Fjord, SE Greenland Title Page Abstract Introduction S. H. Mernild1, G. E. Liston2, I. M. Howat3, Y. Ahn3, K. Steffen4, B. Hasholt5, 5 5 6 B. H. Jakobsen , B. Fog , and D. van As Conclusions References 1 Climate, Ocean, and Sea Ice Modeling Group, Computational Physics and Methods (CCS-2), Tables Figures Los Alamos National Laboratory, New Mexico, USA 2Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere, Colorado State University, J I Colorado, USA 3 Byrd Polar Research Center and School of Earth Sciences, Ohio State University, Ohio, USA J I 4Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Colorado, USA Back Close 5Department of Geography and Geology, University of Copenhagen, Denmark Full Screen / Esc 6Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland, 1350 Copenhagen K, Denmark Received: 29 June 2010 – Accepted: 6 July 2010 – Published: 30 July 2010 Printer-friendly Version Correspondence to: S. H. Mernild ([email protected]) Interactive Discussion Published by Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union. 1195 Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Abstract TCD Fluctuations in terrestrial surface freshwater flux to Sermilik Fjord, SE Greenland, were simulated and analyzed.
    [Show full text]
  • Freshwater Flux to Sermilik Fjord, SE Greenland
    The Cryosphere, 4, 453–465, 2010 www.the-cryosphere.net/4/453/2010/ The Cryosphere doi:10.5194/tc-4-453-2010 © Author(s) 2010. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Freshwater flux to Sermilik Fjord, SE Greenland S. H. Mernild1, I. M. Howat2, Y. Ahn2, G. E. Liston3, K. Steffen4, B. H. Jakobsen5, B. Hasholt5, B. Fog5, and D. van As6 1Climate, Ocean, and Sea Ice Modeling Group, Computational Physics and Methods (CCS-2), Los Alamos National Laboratory, New Mexico, USA 2Byrd Polar Research Center and School of Earth Sciences, Ohio State University, Ohio, USA 3Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere, Colorado State University, Colorado, USA 4Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Colorado, USA 5Department of Geography and Geology, University of Copenhagen, Denmark 6Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland, Denmark Received: 29 June 2010 – Published in The Cryosphere Discuss.: 30 July 2010 Revised: 13 October 2010 – Accepted: 16 October 2010 – Published: 26 October 2010 Abstract. Terrestrial inputs of freshwater flux to Sermi- 1 Introduction lik Fjord, SE Greenland, were estimated, indicating ice dis- charge to be the dominant source of freshwater. A freshwa- Global atmospheric temperatures showed a warming trend − ter flux of 40.4 ± 4.9×109 m3 y 1 was found (1999–2008), since the 1970s, and all years during the present century with an 85% contribution originated from ice discharge (65% (2001–2008) have been among the warmest since the begin- alone from Helheim Glacier), 11% from terrestrial surface ning of instrumental records (Allison et al., 2009). Surface runoff (from melt water and rain), 3% from precipitation air temperature observations reveal the strongest increase at the fjord surface area, and 1% from subglacial geother- occurring over Northern Hemisphere land areas (40–70◦ N) mal and frictional melting due to basal ice motion.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Rapid Response of Helheim Glacier, Greenland, to Climate Variability
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Woods Hole Open Access Server Rapid response of Helheim Glacier, Greenland, to climate variability over the last century Camilla S. Andresen1*, Fiammetta Straneo2, Mads Hvid Ribergaard3, Anders A. Bjørk4, Thorbjørn J. Andersen5, Antoon Kuijpers1, Niels Nørgaard-Pedersen1, Kurt H. Kjær4, Frands Schjøth6, Kaarina Weckström1, Andreas P. Ahlstrøm1 1Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland, Department of Marine Geology and Glaciology, Øster Voldgade 10, 1350 Copenhagen K, Denmark 2Department of Physical Oceanography, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543, USA 3Danish Meterological Institute, Centre for Ocean and Ice, Lyngbyvej 100, 2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark 4Centre for GeoGenetics, Natural History Museum, Øster Voldgade 5-7, 1350 Copenhagen K, Denmark 5Institute for Geology and Geography, Øster Voldgade 10, Univ. of Copenhagen, 1350 Copenhagen K, Denmark 6Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland, Geological Data Centre, Øster Voldgade 10, 1350 Copenhagen K, Denmark * email: [email protected] During the early 2000s the Greenland Ice Sheet experienced the largest ice mass loss observed on the instrumental record1, largely as a result of the acceleration, thinning and retreat of major outlet glaciers in West and Southeast Greenland2-5. The quasi-simultaneous change in 1 the glaciers suggests a common climate forcing and increasing air6 and ocean7-8 temperatures have been indicated as potential triggers. Here, we present a new record of calving activity of Helheim Glacier, East Greenland, extending back to c. 1890 AD. This record was obtained by analysing sedimentary deposits from Sermilik Fjord, where Helheim Glacier terminates, and uses the annual deposition of sand grains as a proxy for iceberg discharge.
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring Fjord Circulation Using Iceberg-Mounted Gps As
    MONITORING FJORD CIRCULATION USING ICEBERG-MOUNTED GPS AS REAL-TIME DRIFTERS by GEORGE EDWARD ROTH A THESIS Presented to the Department of Geological Sciences and the Graduate School of the University of Oregon in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science June 2014 THESIS APPROVAL PAGE Student: George Edward Roth Title: Monitoring Fjord Circulation Using Iceberg-Mounted GPS as Real-Time Drifters This thesis has been accepted and approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Science degree in the Department of Geological Sciences by: David Sutherland Chairperson Emilie Hooft Member Alan Rempel Member and Kimberly Andrews Espy Vice President for Research and Innovation; Dean of the Graduate School Original approval signatures are on file with the University of Oregon Graduate School. Degree awarded June 2014 ii © 2014 George Edward Roth iii THESIS ABSTRACT George Edward Roth Master of Science Department of Geological Sciences June 2014 Title: Monitoring Fjord Circulation Using Iceberg-Mounted GPS as Real-Time Drifters Ocean circulation in Greenland’s large glacial fjords is one mechanism that controls the rate of submarine melting at the termini of Greenland’s outlet glaciers. Here we use hourly position data from GPS units deployed on ten large (>100 meter), deep- keeled icebergs in Sermilik Fjord, SE Greenland. We observe and quantify the motions of these icebergs moving through the mélange, fjord, and shelf regimes. In the mélange, icebergs move outward with glacier flow until pushed loose by large calving events. In the fjord, high frequency, low amplitude tidally-driven motions are superimposed on dominant 1-5 day events with net velocities exceeding 0.1 m/s.
    [Show full text]
  • Freshwater Flux to Sermilik Fjord, SE Greenland
    The Cryosphere, 4, 453–465, 2010 www.the-cryosphere.net/4/453/2010/ The Cryosphere doi:10.5194/tc-4-453-2010 © Author(s) 2010. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Freshwater flux to Sermilik Fjord, SE Greenland S. H. Mernild1, I. M. Howat2, Y. Ahn2, G. E. Liston3, K. Steffen4, B. H. Jakobsen5, B. Hasholt5, B. Fog5, and D. van As6 1Climate, Ocean, and Sea Ice Modeling Group, Computational Physics and Methods (CCS-2), Los Alamos National Laboratory, New Mexico, USA 2Byrd Polar Research Center and School of Earth Sciences, Ohio State University, Ohio, USA 3Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere, Colorado State University, Colorado, USA 4Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Colorado, USA 5Department of Geography and Geology, University of Copenhagen, Denmark 6Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland, Denmark Received: 29 June 2010 – Published in The Cryosphere Discuss.: 30 July 2010 Revised: 13 October 2010 – Accepted: 16 October 2010 – Published: 26 October 2010 Abstract. Terrestrial inputs of freshwater flux to Sermi- 1 Introduction lik Fjord, SE Greenland, were estimated, indicating ice dis- charge to be the dominant source of freshwater. A freshwa- Global atmospheric temperatures showed a warming trend − ter flux of 40.4 ± 4.9×109 m3 y 1 was found (1999–2008), since the 1970s, and all years during the present century with an 85% contribution originated from ice discharge (65% (2001–2008) have been among the warmest since the begin- alone from Helheim Glacier), 11% from terrestrial surface ning of instrumental records (Allison et al., 2009). Surface runoff (from melt water and rain), 3% from precipitation air temperature observations reveal the strongest increase at the fjord surface area, and 1% from subglacial geother- occurring over Northern Hemisphere land areas (40–70◦ N) mal and frictional melting due to basal ice motion.
    [Show full text]
  • Measures Greenland Ice Velocity: Selected Glacier Site Velocity Maps from Optical Images, Version 3
    MEaSUREs Greenland Ice Velocity: Selected Glacier Site Velocity Maps from Optical Images, Version 3 USER GUIDE How to Cite These Data As a condition of using these data, you must include a citation: Howat, I. 2021. MEaSUREs Greenland Ice Velocity: Selected Glacier Site Velocity Maps from Optical Images, Version 3. [Indicate subset used]. Boulder, Colorado USA. NASA National Snow and Ice Data Center Distributed Active Archive Center. https://doi.org/10.5067/RRFY5IW94X5W. [Date Accessed]. FOR QUESTIONS ABOUT THESE DATA, CONTACT [email protected] FOR CURRENT INFORMATION, VISIT https://nsidc.org/data/NSIDC-0646 USER GUIDE: MEaSUREs Greenland Ice Velocity: Selected Glacier Site Velocity Maps from Optical Images, Version 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 DATA DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................................. 2 Parameters ............................................................................................................................................ 2 File Information ...................................................................................................................................... 2 1.2.1 Format.......................................................................................................................................... 2 1.2.2 File Contents ................................................................................................................................ 2 1.2.3 Naming Convention ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]