Mi/Deq/Wb-08/020 Michigan Department Of

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mi/Deq/Wb-08/020 Michigan Department Of MI/DEQ/WB-08/020 MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY WATER BUREAU FEBRUARY 2008 STAFF REPORT A BIOLOGICAL SURVEY OF THE MENOMINEE RIVER WATERSHED INCLUDING THE IRON, BRULE, PAINT, MICHIGAMME, STURGEON, AND LITTLE CEDAR RIVERS SUBWATERSHEDS BARAGA, DICKINSON, IRON, MARQUETTE, AND MENOMINEE COUNTIES, MICHIGAN JUNE 2007 INTRODUCTION Biological, chemical, and physical habitat conditions of selected streams located in the Menominee River (MR) watershed were assessed by staff from the Surface Water Assessment Section (SWAS). The habitat and macroinvertebrate community were qualitatively evaluated using the Great Lakes and Environmental Assessment Section Procedure 51 (MDEQ, 1990; Creal et al., 1996) at 37 sites, water chemistry samples were collected at 6 sites, and visual assessments of biological integrity and physical habitat conditions were made at 1 additional site (Tables 1 and 2; Figures 1, 2, and 3). Historical fish community data were also provided for the MR watershed by the Michigan Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) and Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR, 1997; 1998). GENERAL WATERSHED HISTORY AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION The water bodies discussed in this report are located in Baraga, Dickinson, Iron, Marquette, and Menominee Counties of the Upper Peninsula (UP) (Figures 1-3). All of the water bodies are located in the Northern Lakes and Forest Ecoregion and most flow through the extensively forested landscape prior to entering the Menominee River along the Michigan and Wisconsin border. This large watershed originates near Mount Curwood (1978 feet above sea level) in central Baraga County and flows south through the Peshekee and Michigamme Rivers systems. The majority of streams in the MR watershed are protected for coldwater fish. Forty percent of Michigan’s UP “blue ribbon” trout waters are located within the MR watershed. The headwater geology of the MR watershed strongly influences its surface water quality/quantity characteristics. The watershed topography is characterized by sandy hills and elliptical ridges, called kames and drumlins, respectively, which were created by retreating glaciers during the last ice age (Albert et al., 1986). These well-drained sandy deposits have high infiltration rates (Hendrickson et al., 1973), can be up to 200 feet thick, and are the major sources of cold groundwater to the rivers. The lower Michigamme River subwatershed has a large area of pitted and flat glacial outwash plains. Most MR watershed streams originate in sedge and forested wetlands or shallow kettle lakes, which cause the water to appear stained from the presence of decaying plant material. The MR watershed also has considerable iron-bearing rock formations, known as the Marquette and Menominee Iron Ranges (Dorr and Eschman, 1970). These iron ranges were extensively mined in the late 1880s, which led to considerable development within the MR watershed at the turn of the century. Many of the iron mines ceased operating rather quickly, although a few continued until the mid-20th century. Concentrated discharges of dissolved iron from abandoned mines in the Brule and Iron Rivers subwatersheds have produced an orange paste-like precipitate called “yellow boy,” that has physically smothered and degraded bottom substrate habitat for fish and insects. The logging industry also began in the MR watershed during the late 1800s and the entire watershed was extensively logged by the early 1900s. Networks of gravel roads left over from the logging era still exist in Dickinson, Baraga, and northern Iron Counties. Large scale agriculture did not follow the cutting of the forest due to the short growing season and watershed soil type. Consequently, most of the land was abandoned in the early 1900s. In 1928, the U.S. National Forest Reservation Commission made the first purchase of deforested stump land in the Western UP. By 1935, the U.S. National Forest Reservation Commission purchased over 1.7 million acres that later became known as the Ottawa National Forest. Today, the Ottawa National Forest encompasses much of the upper Brule and Paint Rivers systems; while most of the Michigamme River system is owned by commercial forest product companies. Prior to the logging era, the lower Brule River watershed was intensely managed with fire by Native Americans to stimulate wildlife use. The name Brule (originally “Brulee”) comes from the early French explorers and means “burned woodlands” (MDNR, 1983). The predominant vegetation in the hilly uplands are sugar maple, basswood, and yellow birch, while the lowland vegetation is dominated by american elm, black ash, trembling aspen, and red maple. The vegetation of the drier outwash sand plains includes balsam fir, white pine, Brule River Random Site red pine, and paper birch. A number of point source discharges exist within the area of study. In the MR headwaters there are the West Iron County Sewer Authority Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) and the National Steel-Dober pit site in Caspian on the Iron River, and the Wastewater Sewage Lagoons at Crystal Falls and Alpha. In the mid-river area of Dickinson County, there is a combination of large and small National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permitted facilities, including the Iron Mountain/Kingsford WWTP, Verso Paper-Quinnesec, Niagara Paper, and Norway WWTP. The lower Menominee River has several industrial and municipal NPDES permitted facilities such as Scott Paper, Great Lakes Pulp and Fiber, Stephenson WWTP, and Menominee Paper. The Sturgeon Dam was located on the Sturgeon River near Waucedah, Michigan. This structure was to be removed as part of a Federal Energy Regulatory Commission agreement with the Wisconsin Electric Power Company called, “Wilderness Shores Settlement Agreement,” dated February 10, 1997. The Sturgeon Dam removal plan called for the 50-foot dam to be removed in three stages over a period of 4-5 years. The staged removal of Sturgeon Dam began in 2003 and was completed by 2007(see dam removal images below). By removing the dam in stages, it will allow the 248-acre reservoir and associated sediment to stabilize, thereby reducing fish and wildlife impacts. The waterfall has been restored and the Sturgeon River is now free flowing in the lower stretch. 2 2005 Partial Removal 2007 Complete Removal In April 2002, the western end of the UP experienced a 50-year flood event impacting many tributaries in the MR system. The county road system washed out at numerous points including several of the 2007 survey stations (Mining Journal, 2002). Fish community assessments using Procedure 51 were not performed during the 2007 study. However, extensive fish community data have been collected by the MDNR, Fisheries Division, for many MR watershed streams, including the Brule, Iron, Paint, Pine, and Michigamme Rivers, and Armstrong Creek (MDNR, 1973, 1982, 1983, 1984, 1986, 1987; Taft, 1992, 1993, 1995, and 1998; and Wagner et al., 1994). These historical fish community data clearly indicate that the majority of streams in the MR watershed support coldwater game fish, primarily brook and brown trout, either seasonally or year-round. MONITORING OBJECTIVES These watershed surveys were conducted to evaluate water quality and aquatic life within the Menominee River watershed. A total of 38 sites were either monitored or visited during this survey (Tables 1 and 2; Figures 1-3). Specifically, the survey objectives were to: 1. Produce a statistical summary of biological integrity using a probabilistic sampling design to assess the current status and condition of individual water bodies and determine whether Michigan water quality standards (WQS) are being met. 2. Support water quality-based effluent limit development for existing NPDES permits in the watershed. 3. Identify NPS of water quality impairment and evaluate the effectiveness of specific NPS water quality improvement projects. 4. Satisfy monitoring requests submitted by internal and external customers. 5. Determine if the water quality is changing over time. Funding for NPS planning and best management practice (BMP) implementation has been provided for in Dickinson and Iron Counties within the MR watershed. Numerous BMPs and stream habitat improvement projects using federal Section 319 or the state’s Clean Michigan 3 Initiative (CMI) bond monies have been implemented since 2000 by both the Dickinson County Conservation District and the Iron River Watershed Council. A cattle exclusion project along the lower Iron River at the James Shepich farm was evaluated in 2007 and is discussed below. Future enhancement projects are expected to be evaluated in the Iron River, Fumee Creek, White Creek, and Hamilton/Fitzgerald Creek watersheds by SWAS staff. RESULTS Current Status/Attainment of Standards A. Probabilistic Sites The MDEQ, Water Bureau, has recently begun to incorporate a stratified random sampling design component into the annual watershed assessments (MDEQ, 2008A). The purpose of this probabilistic monitoring is to collect biological data for attainment status and temporal trend analysis. Probability sampling allows us to extend the conclusions from a limited number of sampling stations to all sites in the watershed. The resulting data can be used to infer the condition of the state’s waters at site-specific, watershed, or statewide scales. The status and trend program utilizes river valley segments to provide the basic sampling unit. A river valley segment is defined as a stream reach that is relatively homogenous with respect to
Recommended publications
  • Crystal Falls Township Master Plan
    CRYSTAL FALLS TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN January 2003 Updated 2010 Updated January 2017 Township Officials Master Plan 2017 Crystal Falls Township Iron County, Michigan Planning Commission Curtis Stebic, Chair and Secretary Diane Kut Kenneth West Patrick Olsen Dan Lato Board of Trustees Thomas Lesandrini, Supervisor Nancy Niemi, Clerk Donna Gustafson, Treasurer Joanne Seppala, Trustee Diane Kut, Trustee Zoning Administrator Cary Gustafson With Assistance From: GEI Consultants of Michigan, P.C. 990 Lalley Road Iron River, MI 49935 Table of Contents Chapter 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 1 Regional Location and Context .............................................................................. 3 Brief History ........................................................................................................... 4 Chapter II Existing Conditions ....................................................................................................... 6 Demographics ......................................................................................................... 6 Population ............................................................................................................... 6 Housing ................................................................................................................... 8 Income................................................................................................................... 11 Economic
    [Show full text]
  • Iron County, Michigan
    PRESENTS IRON COUNTY, MICHIGAN The Western Terminus of the Menominee Iron Range Compiled by William John Cummings 2012 Map of Iron County, Michigan, With Townships IRON COUNTY, MICHIGAN Iron County was established in September, 1885, having been severed from Marquette County’s Ely Township, established in 1871, and a small portion along the Brule River was taken from Menominee County. The southwest portion of Marquette County was originally Ely Township, but when Baraga County was formed in 1875, the land now forming Iron County was placed in the new Township of Republic. In 1882 Crystal Falls Township and Iron River Township were formed after petitions were made to the Marquette County Board of Supervisors for representation. Pat E. Dunn, of Crystal Falls, and Daniel J. Lay, of Iron River Township, took their respective seats on the Marquette County Board of Supervisors on May 29, 1882. Economic development was primarily based on the mining and logging industries and was enriched by the diverse ethnic mixture of its people. When Iron County was formed five townships were created: Iron River, Crystal Falls, Felch, Bates and Mastodon. Crystal Falls serves as the county seat. In 1890, the population of Iron County was 4,432. The county has a total area of 1,211.02 square miles of which 1,166.36 square miles is land and 44,67 square miles is water. TOWNSHIPS • Atkinson Township, established in October, 1892, from Iron River Township; lands returned to Iron River Township when Atkinson Township was dissolved in 1906 • Bates Township, one of
    [Show full text]
  • List of All FERC Regulated Dams in Wisconsin And
    FERC Regulated Dams in Wisconsin (Listed by county) Adams County Dam Name FERC ID Licensee Waterway Website Link Wisconsin River Petenwell P-1984A Wisconsin River http://www.wisconsinriverpower.com/ Power Co Ashland County Dam Name FERC ID Licensee Waterway Website Link https://www.xcelenergy.com/energy_portfol White River P - 2444 Xcel Energy White River io/electricity/power_plants/white_river Brown County Dam Name FERC ID Licensee Waterway Website Link De Pere P - 4914 Thilmany LLC. Fox River No website Burnett County Dam Name FERC ID Licensee Waterway Website Link Renewable World http://renewableworldenergies.com/hydro- Clam River P - 9185 Clam River Energies plant-dam/clam-river Renewable World http://renewableworldenergies.com/hydro- Danbury Dam P - 9184 Yellow River Energies plant-dam/danbury-1 Chippewa County Dam Name FERC ID Licensee Waterway Website Link https://www.xcelenergy.com/energy_portfol Chippewa Falls P-2440 Xcel Energy Chippewa River io/electricity/power_plants/chippewa_falls https://www.xcelenergy.com/energy_portfol Cornell P-2639 Xcel Energy Chippewa River io/electricity/power_plants/cornell https://www.xcelenergy.com/energy_portfol Holcombe P - 1982 Xcel Energy Chippewa River io/electricity/power_plants/holcombe https://www.xcelenergy.com/energy_portfol Jim Falls P - 2491 Xcel Energy Chippewa River io/electricity/power_plants/jim_falls https://www.xcelenergy.com/energy_portfol Wissota P-2567 Xcel Energy Chippewa River io/electricity/power_plants/wissota Dane County Dam Name FERC ID Licensee Waterway Website Link Dunkirk
    [Show full text]
  • Michigan Department of Natural Resources (DNR)
    Michigan STATE OF MICHIGAN DNR DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Number 33 June 2005 The Fish Community and Fishery of Michigamme Reservoir, Iron County, Michigan with Emphasis on Walleyes and Northern Pike Patrick A. Hanchin, Richard D. Clark, Jr., and Roger N. Lockwood Margeson Creek Light Lake Fence River Liver Lake Deer River Moccasin Lake Michigamme River Michigamme Reservoir Approximately 20 miles to the town of Republic Michigamme River Clark's Creek 0 1 2 Miles www.michigan.gov/dnr/ FISHERIES DIVISION SPECIAL REPORT MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES FISHERIES DIVISION Fisheries Special Report 33 June 2005 The Fish Community and Fishery of Michigamme Reservoir, Iron County, Michigan with Emphasis on Walleyes and Northern Pike Patrick A. Hanchin Michigan Department of Natural Resources Charlevoix Fisheries Research Station 96 Grant Street Charlevoix, Michigan 49721-0117 Richard D. Clark, Jr. and Roger N. Lockwood School of Natural Resources and Environment University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1084 The Michigan Department of Natural Resources (MDNR), provides equal opportunities for employment and access to Michigan’s natural resources. Both State and Federal laws prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, religion, disability, age, sex, height, weight or marital status under the Civil Rights Acts of 1964, as amended, (1976 MI P.A. 453 and 1976 MI P.A. 220, Title V of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and the Americans with Disabilities Act). If you believe that you have been discriminated against in any program, activity or facility, or if you desire additional information, please write the MDNR Office of Legal Services, P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Flashiness Analysis of Gaged Michigan Rivers and Streams
    MI/DEQ/WRD-12/028 Application of the Richards-Baker Flashiness Index to Gaged Michigan Rivers and Streams Dave Fongers Hydrologic Studies and Dam Safety Unit Water Resources Division With Assistance from Robert Day Joseph Rathbun Nonpoint Source Unit Water Resources Division May 3, 2012 This Nonpoint Source Pollution Control project has been funded wholly by the United States Environmental Protection Agency through a Part 319 grant to the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality. The contents of this document do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, nor does the mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. For more information, please visit www.michigan.gov/nps. The cover depicts the United States Geological Survey gages analyzed using the Richards-Baker Flashiness Index method. For comments or questions relating to this document, please contact Dave Fongers at: Michigan Department of Environmental Quality Water Resources Division P.O. Box 30458 Lansing, Michigan 48909-7958 [email protected] Table of Contents Summary .................................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 2 Methodology............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Highway Bridge Report - May 18, 2017
    Highway Bridge Report - May 18, 2017 Highway Bridge Report - Listed By County The Michigan Department of Transportation regularly inspects the thousands of bridges and overpasses on our state's highways. MDOT employs more than 20 bridge inspectors who have specialized training and work in teams of two. They evaluate bridges and assign condition ratings using a rating system established by the federal government. What's included in the bridge condition report? The most recent report shows the condition scores and sufficiency ratings for all highway bridges longer than 20 feet, as of May 18, 2017. Stats at a Glance: This report lists 4478 bridges, of which 228 are structurally deficient. This data is current as of May 18, 2017. NOT covered in this report: • Structures 20 feet or less in length. MDOT inspects these shorter structures, but they are not included in this report. • The Ambassador Bridge in Detroit. This bridge is privately owned and operated. • The Mackinac, International and Blue Water bridges are inspected annually, exceeding federal requirements. These three bridges are managed by bridge authorities, and their ratings are not included in the report posted to the Web. Contents: Condition of state highway bridges listed by county.................................................. 2 What is NHS Status.....................................................................................................143 Bridge condition definitions....................................................................................... 143 Bridge
    [Show full text]
  • Eat Safe Fish Guide
    Michigan Department Health and Human Services’ Eat Safe Fish Guide Some fish contain chemicals that can harm your health. MDHHS tests filets of fish taken from Michigan’s lakes and rivers to learn which fish are safer to eat. The Eat Safe Fish Guide lists the fish that have been tested and how much is safe to eat. Inside the Guide About the Guide ............................................................... 5 Michigan DNR Fishing Laws ........................................... 5 Questions About Eating Safe Fish? ............................... 5 Choosing Safer Fish .......................................................... 6 My Michigan, MI Serving Size ........................................ 6 How much is MI Serving? ............................................... 6 Are you pregnant? ......................................................... 6 Special MI Serving Categories ........................................ 7 Get to know the 3Cs ......................................................... 8 Statewide Safe Fish Guidelines ....................................... 9 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) ............................. 10 Common Michigan Fish ................................................. 12 Fish Eating Guidelines by County ................................. 14 This page left blank on purpose. 4 www.michigan.gov/eatsafefish About the Guide The Eat Safe Fish Guide (ESF Guide) is provided by the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services (MDHHS). • The fish listed under each lake or river in the ESF Guide have been tested for chemicals. • Scientists from MDHHS test ONLY the filet of the fish - the part that you would eat - to determine the guidelines included in the ESF Guide. • MDHHS uses the test results from the fish filets to find the average amount of chemicals in the fish species from that lake or river. They use this information to determine how much fish is safe to eat per month. • The ESF Guide is not a rulebook. These are only guidelines to help you make safer choices for you and your family.
    [Show full text]
  • Logs on the Menominee: the History of the Menominee River Boom Company by Fred C
    PRESENTS EARLY LOGGING ON THE EASTERN MENOMINEE IRON RANGE Life in a Logging Camp & Cutting Timber & Log Drives Compiled by William John Cummings 2011 THE LIFE OF A LUMBERJACK OR “SHANTY BOY” LUMBER CAMPS – LOADING LOGS – LOG DRIVES This unidentified lumber camp crew probably worked in Breen or Felch Township, Dickinson County. [Beatrice Blomquist] ESTABLISHING A LUMBER CAMP – SELECTING THE SITE – 1 Excerpts from A White Pine Empire: The Life of a Lumberman by John Emmett Nelligan, 1929 John Emmett Nelligan’s years as a camp cook, land looker, logger, river boss, cutting contractor, woods foreman and buyer spanned the years from the end of the Civil War to the cutting of the pines in Minnesota in the early 1900’s. He worked in the pineries in New Brunswick, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin and Minnesota, and helped lay out Foster City. The following excerpts from his autobiography A White Pine Empire: The Life of a Lumberman provide authentic descriptions of logging in the western Upper Peninsula and beyond. • The foreman and crew select a site for a camp, clear the ground, and construct several buildings, a men’s camp, a cook’s camp, a stable, a hay shed, and a granary. • While the crew is engaged in constructing the camp, the foreman has been prowling around the forest making blazes on certain trees with his axe, laying out roads. The main road is laid out along a creek bottom if the nature of the terrain permits, so that there will be ample water at hand with which to ice it. And the land along the creek is usually level and devoid of obstructions and troublesome grades.
    [Show full text]
  • To See the Dickinson Diggings Cover Photographs and Illustrations
    DICKINSON DIGGINGS COVER PHOTOGRAPHS AND ILLUSTRATIONS VOLUME I VOLUME III January, 1982 None February, 1984 – Swedish Free Missionary Church, Iron Mountain , Michigan, ca. 1890 April, 1982 None August, 1982 None November, 1982 None VOLUME II January, 1983 – Maja Kajaa Larsdotter, great- grandmother of Rev. Donald Wold (no JPEG) April, 1983 – Company E, 34 th Michigan Volunteers, Spanish American War, 1898 May, 1984 – Morgan Lumber and Cedar Company Mill, Foster City , Michigan, ca. 1905 August, 1983 – Swedish Mission Church Scandinavian String Band, Iron Mountain , ca. 1896-1902 November, 1983 – Group of Miners Employed at the Chapin Mine, Iron Mountain , ca. 1905 August, 1984 – Swedish Christian Mission Church, Norway , Michigan, ca. 1910-1915 (postcard view – not in files) 1 DICKINSON DIGGINGS COVER PHOTOGRAPHS AND ILLUSTRATIONS November, 1984 – Winter Logging May, 1985 – L.M. Hanson’s Livery Stable Operations at the Kenny Farm, Hylas , Advertisement, Iron Mountain , 1892 Iron Michigan, ca. 1910 Mountain City Directory VOLUME IV February, 1985 – William Chapple Trestrail 2 DICKINSON DIGGINGS COVER PHOTOGRAPHS AND ILLUSTRATIONS August, 1985 – Dehn & Stutts, Sing Kee and Herny La Fountain Advertisements, Iron Mountain, 1892 Iron Mountain City Directory 3 DICKINSON DIGGINGS COVER PHOTOGRAPHS AND ILLUSTRATIONS November, 1985 – Gust Pederson, A. Richter, Sol Noble Advertisements, Iron Mountain , 1892 Iron Mountain City Directory VOLUME V February, 1986 None May, 1986 – 300 Block of Iron Mountain ’s Stephenson Avenue, ca. 1890-1899 4 DICKINSON DIGGINGS COVER PHOTOGRAPHS AND ILLUSTRATIONS VOLUME VI August, 1986 – Andrew Rian Family, Metropolitan , Michigan (in surrey), ca. 1900 February, 1987 – Eskil’s Art Gallery, Iron Mountain , (cut from back of cabinet photograph), ca.
    [Show full text]
  • Michigan Department of Natural Resources Fisheries Division
    ATUR F N AL O R T E N S E O U M R T C R E STATE OF MICHIGAN A S P E DNR D M DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES ICHIGAN SR59 October 2011 The Fish Community and Fishery of Lake Michigamme, Baraga and Marquette Counties, Michigan in 2006 with Emphasis on Walleye and Northern Pike David C. Caroffino and Patrick A. Hanchin Spurr River Peshekee River Lake Michigamme Black Lake State Forest Camp Ground Van Riper State Park N 0 1 2 Miles Dam Michigamme River www.michigan.gov/dnr/ FISHERIES DIVISION SPECIAL REPORT 59 This page was intentionally left blank. MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES FISHERIES DIVISION Fisheries Special Report 59 October 2011 The Fish Community and Fishery of Lake Michigamme, Baraga and Marquette Counties, Michigan in 2006 with Emphasis on Walleye and Northern Pike David C. Caroffino and Patrick A. Hanchin MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES (DNR) MISSION STATEMENT “The Michigan Department of Natural Resources is committed to the conservation, protection, management, use and enjoyment of the state’s natural and cultural resources for current and future generations.” NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION (NRC) STATEMENT The Natural Resources Commission, as the governing body for the Michigan Department of Natural Resources, provides a strategic framework for the DNR to effectively manage your resources. The NRC holds monthly, public meetings throughout Michigan, working closely with its constituencies in establishing and improving natural resources management policy. MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES NON DISCRIMINATION STATEMENT The Michigan Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) provides equal opportunities for employment and access to Michigan’s natural resources.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fish Community and Fishery of Peavy Pond, Iron County, Michigan with Emphasis on Walleye and Northern Pike
    ATUR F N AL O R T E N S E O U M R T C R E A STATE OF MICHIGAN S P E DNR D M ICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES SR57 September 2011 The Fish Community and Fishery of Peavy Pond, Iron County, Michigan with Emphasis on Walleye and Northern Pike Patrick A. Hanchin Michigamme Lake Mary River Paint River Peavy Pond 0 1 2 Michigamme Lake Miles Brule River Menominee River Wisconsin www.michigan.gov/dnr/ FISHERIES DIVISION SPECIAL REPORT 57 This page was intentionally left blank. MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES FISHERIES DIVISION Fisheries Special Report 57 September 2011 The Fish Community and Fishery of Peavy Pond, Iron County, Michigan with Emphasis on Walleye and Northern Pike Patrick A. Hanchin MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES (DNR) MISSION STATEMENT “The Michigan Department of Natural Resources is committed to the conservation, protection, management, use and enjoyment of the state’s natural and cultural resources for current and future generations.” NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION (NRC) STATEMENT The Natural Resources Commission, as the governing body for the Michigan Department of Natural Resources, provides a strategic framework for the DNR to effectively manage your resources. The NRC holds monthly, public meetings throughout Michigan, working closely with its constituencies in establishing and improving natural resources management policy. MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES NON DISCRIMINATION STATEMENT The Michigan Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) provides equal opportunities for employment and access to Michigan’s natural resources. Both State and Federal laws prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, religion, disability, age, sex, height, weight or marital status under the Civil Rights Acts of 1964 as amended (MI PA 453 and MI PA 220, Title V of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 as amended, and the Americans with Disabilities Act).
    [Show full text]
  • Menominee River Watershed Report Water Resources Division Surface Water Assessment Section
    MI/DEQ/WRD-15/048 MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY Menominee River Watershed Report Water Resources Division Surface Water Assessment Section John Matousek 12/31/2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents........................................................................................................................... i 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Purpose .......................................................................................................................... 1 2 Watershed Description .......................................................................................................... 2 2.1 Natural Features.............................................................................................................2 2.2 Land Use ........................................................................................................................ 3 2.3 Area of Concern (AOC) ..................................................................................................4 2.4 Attainment Status ...........................................................................................................6 2.4.1 TMDLs.....................................................................................................................6 2.4.2 Fish Consumption Advisories ..................................................................................7 2.5 Permitted Discharges .....................................................................................................7
    [Show full text]