The MSU Undergraduate Historian
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
The MSU Undergraduate Historian Volume 3, 2007 The MSU Undergraduate Historian is a branch of the History Association of Michigan State, which can be contacted at: History Association of Michigan State 301 Morrill Hall East Lansing, MI 48824 [email protected] [email protected] http://www.msu.edu/~hams/historian/ Printed By: Cblue (Commercial Blueprint, Inc.) 416 N. Cedar St, Lansing, Mi 48912 517-372-8360 www.commblue.com Engineering Copiers, Plotters & Supplies, Printing, Copying, Scanning, Graphics Signs, Posters, Trade Show Booths The MSU Undergraduate Historian Staff Editor-in-Chief Readers Secretary Erin K. Biebuyck Pete Bechtold Christie L. Hoyt Richard Belisle Managing Editor Belinda Bombrisk Distribution Manager Brandon Dornbusch Dimity Palazzola Aaron Honsowetz Bridget Ferrigan Patrick Gottry Board of Editors Matthew Kelterborn Additional Readers Harlan McCaffery Jeff Brown Heather Bradley Samara Napolitan Colleen Harnett Caitl yn Perr y Jennifer Stowell Lauren Lippert Jared Natzke TABLE OF CONTENTS Letter from the Editors 3 A Note on our Review Process 5 ESSAYS Contextualizing the Atlantic Slave Trade: Slave Scars of Identity Patrick Michael Gottry 7 Shame and Obligation: Memories of Native Fascism in Hungary Erin K. Biebuyck 24 The Backbench Rebellion: Parliamentary Labour Party Division on the Eve of the Iraq War Ryan Etzcorn 40 Black GIs and European Women: Interracial Relationships During World War II John Haezebrouck 54 Digging Up the Roots of the Soweto Student Uprising on June 16, 1976 Claire Knittel 64 From Myth to Fact: Reexamining Depictions of the Mongol Invasions of Japan Jared Natzke 80 Subversive Files: Red Squads in Our Own Backyard Thomas James Caron 94 REVIEWS French Inegalitarianism Review of France in Crisis: Welfare, Inequality, and Globalization since 1980 by Timothy B. Smith Nada Zohdy 124 From Inyensi to Gacaca: Gender and Representation of the 1994 Rwandan Genocide through Film Amanda Baranowski 132 Contributor Biographies 153 Lesser-known Academic Specializations in the MSU History Department 156 Submission Policy 157 3 LETTER FROM THE EDITORS It with great pleasure and a small measure of relief that we present to you The 2007 MSU Undergraduate Historian. Now in its third edition, The MSU Undergraduate Historian represents a continuing tradition of showcasing the best undergraduate scholarship at Michigan State University. This year’s journal includes nine essays on a variety of historical topics, from Atlantic history and African history, to collective memory and gender history. The 2007 Historian represents the culmination of six months of hard work and dedication on the part of the Historian staff and those who have aided and abetted us. This publication would not have been possible without the commitment and enthusiasm of the MSU undergraduate community, from which we draw both our staff and our submission base. The Historian staff worked tirelessly to promote the journal, read submissions, edit the selections, and otherwise bring this journal into being. Their determination and their love of history are truly the heart and soul of this project. Equally important to our efforts this year have been those students who submitted their work for consideration. We received nearly one hundred submissions, and it proved quite difficult to choose from among them. Our thanks also go to those historians whose work is showcased in this journal. They have worked diligently with our board of editors to prepare their articles for publication. Another cohort that deserves our profuse thanks is the faculty, staff, and graduate students of the MSU Department of History. Without their support and encouragement, this endeavor would not be possible. In particular we would like to thank Dr. Keely Stauter-Halsted, Associate Chair of the Department of History. Dr. Stauter-Halsted has contributed to the success of this journal in many ways, from securing funding for the Historian to giving advice and reviewing essays. Our gratitude also goes to Dr. Emily Tabuteau, Associate Chair for Undergraduate Education, who has also contributed to this achievement in a number of ways. Dr. Tabuteau enthusiastically promoted the Historian, garnering us essay submissions from undergraduates and recognition from other quarters, and reviewed several essays under consideration. Special thanks go to Karina Hernandez in the 4 Department office, who has helped us over the years to increase the level of professionalism of our small publication. Although space will not permit us mention by name all of those who have helped us along the way, we would like to express our gratitude to all of the professors and graduate students who assisted us by reviewing essays in their areas of expertise. Your willingness to share your knowledge continues to raise the scholarly quality of our journal. Last, but by no means least, I would like to thank Dr. Mark Kornbluh, Department Chair, and Dr. Christine Daniels, faculty advisor to the History Association of Michigan State and by extension The MSU Undergraduate Historian. It is only with their continued support and encouragement that this publication is possible. Erin K. Biebuyck Dimity Palazzola Editor-in-Chief Managing Editor 5 A Note on our Review Process All essays submitted to The MSU Undergraduate Historian for consideration are reviewed anonymously, identified only by the author’s student identification number. Each essay is read and reviewed by one member of the editorial board and three to four readers. Essays that stand out among our collection of submissions are identified and sent to MSU professors and graduate students for review. Professors and upper level graduate students review essays within the area of their specialization in order to ensure the factual accuracy of the information presented and originality of the argument. Throughout this process the author’s identity remains unknown to those reviewing the essay in order to ensure the impartiality of our selection process. Contextualizing the Atlantic Slave Trade 6 CONTEXTUALIZING THE ATLANTIC SLAVE TRADE: SLAVE SCARS OF IDENTITY Patrick Michael Gottry n October 1751, James Conyers of Black River, South Carolina described his African slave in a runaway slave advertisement as a I“Gambia new negro fellow,” who had been “marked on the forehead with a cross, and had three perpendicular stokes on each cheek.”1 Conyers specifically referenced his slave’s pattern of scarification in his advertisement, as those scars provided a clear-cut method of identifying the runaway slave. Moreover, the marks described by Conyers embodied a recurring symbol of African ethnic identity — the scarification of the body and the face. In 1913, historian E. Torday organized African scarification into three groups: (1) scars made by cutting knobs above the surface of the skin which appear darker than the surrounding skin; (2) scars made by cutting small, yet faint cuts which appear lighter than the surrounding skin; and (3) scars formed by scoring or burning lines in the skin which do not project above the surface of the skin.2 Scarification can be broadly defined as a permanent alteration or marking of the body. While the historical classification of scars developed by E. Torday is useful, for the purpose of this paper scarification will be divided into two broad categories: (1) ritual scarification and (2) forced scarification. Ritual scarification is defined to include scars made for the purpose of signifying titled members of society and ethnic identification, scars made to demonstrate a rite of passage, and scars made for the purpose of ornamentation. Forced scarification is defined to include scars made for the purpose of denoting slave status or as a sign of punishment. In 1990, West African historian Jean-Loup Amselle argued that pre-colonial African ethnic identities had never been fixed, being defined by fluid boundaries.3 This argument, however, has been contradicted and refined by several historians, as posited by historian Walter Hawthorne in his 2004 article entitled History and Identity in Senegambia and on the Upper Guinea Coast. Historian Peter Mark 7 The MSU Undergraduate Historian demonstrated that the “boundaries of one West African coastal identity [Luso-Africans] became fixed and rigid before the onset of nineteenth- century European colonial rule.”4 Historian Joshua Forrest added that pre-colonial ethnic identities had been “territorial specific.” Hawthorne noted that, in Forrest’s thinking, “ethnicity was important because the members of groups had the right to rule specific land areas.”5 Amselle’s theory is contradicted in part by the use of ritual scarification in Africa to permanently mark the individual as a member of a group or to identify certain rituals which the individual had undergone. Additionally, forced scarification imposed a rigid identification on captured African slaves and created new groupings and social identities tied to their captors, owners, and others. This paper will explore the ways in which both ritual and forced scarifications marked slaves with a permanent symbol and tie to their African ethnic identity and their slavery during the era of the Atlantic Slave Trade.6 Ritual Scarification Anthropologist Christiana Knudsen observed that scarification, particularly among African nations, “has been made more conspicuous by cicatrisation,”7 a form of scarring which entails either the gashing of the body or face with a sharp instrument or the application of plant juices to skin in order to cause irritation of the skin. Because of their dark pigmentation, Africans rubbed charcoal, gunpowder or sand into their wounds in order to give emphasis to their scarring patterns. These scarring patterns were often used for “ritual scarification.” Scars of the “ritual” classification fall into three categories: scars that distinguished ethnic and social identities, scars made to demonstrate a rite of passage, and scars of ornamentation. African ethnic identities during the era of the Atlantic Slave trade were enormously complex and could be focused on a village, village group, town, or state and could also be family or kin-based. Indeed, this variety is reflected in the historical record.