DOCSLIB.ORG

Drainage Basins of Iowa

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Drainage Basins of Iowa Big Spirit Dorchester 9 Larchwood Tuttle U P Upper New 59 Lake 71 139 D R A I N A G E B A S I N S Little Rock SoldierLake Rake Scarville Silver Mona Chester Hesper Albin Harris I C E Burr Oak Lake Lake Meyer Lime Springs Highlandville 9 Spirit IANW Otranto IANW 86 Superior Dolliver Toeterville Cr. Lester H Park Orleans Northwood C N River 182 Rock Rapids 9 Lake Cr. East Lake Beaver Iowa H H U P Edna Sibley Silver Lake Montgomery 2 Carpenter McIntire Kendallville 26 River Ocheyedan H 9 Estherville Cr. Mills 1 Stacyville M Okoboji Armstrong Ledyard 27 4 Lake Allendorf E.Okoboji 169 Buffalo Center Elk I O F I 0 W A Lake 9 U P 63 Bluffton 52 S Pahoja L Y O N 86 Lake W O R T H Little Cedar Lake Hendricks 76 Lansing S O S C E O L A Okoboji UP Gruver 9 9 69 2 St. Ansgar Cresco I 0 Little S River Wahpeton Arnolds Park Maple Hill Swea Thompson 8 Cr. 65 9 S B N S F Upper Gar Lake West 9 Joice H I River Little Alvord Slough Lakota Bolan C N 218 P George West Okoboji Lake Minnewashta City Shell Saratoga 9 Churchtown Little Lower Gar Lake 169 W I N N E B A G O Riceville 9 P 18 75 Rock Black Kensett Grafton I C E I Milford Terril E M M E T 15 Buffalo M I T C H E L L Beloit Inwood Doon May City High Fork Wapsipinicon H O W A R D Ridgeway Ingham Lake Leland UP (DME) D I C K I N S O N 2 New H A L L A M A K E E Ashton Ocheyedan Lake Cunningham Slough Bancroft 0 Wallingford Wapsipinicon Decorah SD Creek Creek Hanlontown 3 Manly Mitchell Creek 60 Melvin Bur Ringsted H Haven Schley Turkey U P 71 4 (DA Oak Forest City 9 9 9 I R) Otter River Lake I ANR Osage Lourdes K O S S U T H N. 9 Cedar 52 H Muddy 9 Waukon Cat Plymouth 9 Harpers Rock Valley Matlock Stony Titonka Fostoria Lone Fertile Elma Waterville Ferry Hull R. Graettinger Fenton Crystal 18 Sheldon West 35 1 U P Rock W I N N E S H I E K Sanborn Rock Woden Lake River Orchard Little H H West U P 9 Hartley Langdon I C E Falls Perkins 18 18 Mud Lake Crystal Lake Winnebago 7 Cedar Jerico Protivin Calmar Frankville Boyden Trumball Five Island E. Miller Spillville Rossville 76 I C E Cr. H Lost Island 15 Hayfield 218 Alta Vista 51 Rock Lake Burt Mason City Crane Lake Meyers Waukon Carmel Everly Lake Clear 1 Prepared By (UP) Lake 27 9 Colwell Turkey 59 Spencer Des Br. 63 Junction River 24 Cr. Lake 4 H Nora Springs Ossian River Moneta Fort Atkinson Archer Ruthven 122 Floyd River Yellow Waterman 18 Rudd North S I O U X H 1 I ATR 18 27 Washington I C E 60 Dickens Duncan 9 Festina H Newkirk Primghar Lake Smith Wesley 18 Ventura 3 27 I C E Jackson Castalia 52 Postville Office of Transportation Data C L A Y Emmetsburg Cylinder 1 18 Sioux U P Sexton Portland C H I C K A S A W Royal I C E 18 I C E 9 Flood I C E Charles Jct H 18 0 I C E Lawler Luana Monona Cr.Center 4 18 H Britt 1 City Bassett Waucoma Hospers Hutchins Br. Garner Burchinal 150 18 P A L O A L T O 8 18 24 I C E Orange O ’ B R I E N 17 8 14 H Floyd U P Gillett Silver Lake St. Lucas Mill Cr. 71 Rodman Algona H New Hampton Creek R. Marquette Hawarden City H 65 H Eldorado Roberts System Enhancement Grove H A N C O C K 35 U P Rossie Whittemore H River 10 Gaza Ayrshire Fork Rockford RiverC N 18 Alton Lotts Irvington St. Benedict River Iowa Ionia Clermont McGregor Des C E R R O Ireton Paullina U P G O R D O Roseville Froelich Greenville Corwith 1 Gunder Giard 10 8 Alpha 18 15 Iowa 2 Swaledale Rockwell Sixmile Maurice Granville Sutherland Klemme F L O Y D Fredericksburg West Union Elgin 12 Curlew Eldred 27 Moines 18 75 Calumet Dog 10 U P 69 Sherwood Cedar Lake 346 18 H Farmersburg Phone (515)239-1289 Thornton Creek 13 National Chatsworth Germantown Peterson R. Marble Hawkeye River Creek West Bend Cr. Lake Rock 14 Struble Webb Moines Rock Nashua St. Olaf Lake 10 St. Joseph River Goodell 1 52 Clayton Mallard 8 Dougherty Little Volga Donnan 56 Lu Verne Kanawha Cr. Craig Sioux Meservey 0 River Sioux 60 143 Linn Ottosen U P Greene Frederika 128 September 1, 2008 Cr. Grove Plover 63 SD(DAIR) Sioux Rapids 17 Creek U P 1 Otter 56 H B N S F Marathon Bode Sheffield 150 Garnavillo Seney U P Boone I A N R 218 Larrabee Creek 7 W. H Randalia Elkader Akron Oyens Marcus 10 Laurens Livermore 6 Sumner Wadena Brunsville Remsen C N 188 93 3 H Cleghorn 59 Rembrandt H Chapin Aredale 188 Cedar 3 Branch 10 169 River Belmond Fayette Big 3 Horton 3 Meriden Little Plainfield C L A Y T O N Havelock Bradgate Hardy Renwick Lake Wapsipinicon Guttenberg Kettle Le Mars N. U P U P Alexander 27 Albert City Rolfe Eagle Cornelia 93 F A Y E T T E H Fork C N 1 Clarksville Tripoli Westgate Volga W. 15 RiverH U M B O L D T 7 Bristow Littleport Garber River 0 Creek River Westfield Deer Creek Lake River Merrill 65 Hansell Maynard 187 River 3 P O C A H O N T A S Dakota Holmes Rowan Latimer Allison B R E M E R Arlington Elkport 12 Cherokee H Rutland H Goldfield 150 13 Truesdale 3 City Clarion 3 3 Osterdock P L Y M O U T H 3 3 3 Dumont H Broken 1 Aurelia Hampton 3 Otter H Pocahontas Gilmore H Iowa 6 Coulter Cedar 14 Shell Rock 3 Millville (U P) B U E N A V I S T A 5 U P H Strawberry Raccoon Branch C H E R O K E E Cr. Humboldt 35 Readlyn Oran Oelwein 140 City R. Alta Thor 3 Maquoketa 17 W R I G H Creek T 75 7 S. 4 F R A N K L I N Avenue of the Waverly Point 52 H Storm Varina Galt Saints Lake Colesburg N. Buena Vista Balltown RI Pioneer Eagle Grove U P Geneva B U T L E R 187 3 C N Quimby Lake Janesville Sioux C N (IANR) Stanley V 1 Denver Crane H Lizard ER Hinton Lakeside Palmer Dows 5 Kesley Cr. 9 Bradford 281 Aurora Edgewood Sulphur Lake U P Luxemburg Newell Badger River 218 Fairbank Holy Cross River 38 Sherrill Kingsley 31 Springs Cedar Floyd C N Finchford 3 B N S F Washta 7 Br. U P Fox Beaver D W R V Hazleton 13 52 Hanover Storm Fonda 169 1 Popejoy Austinville 27 63 Buffalo Greeley 3 Durango Sageville U P Aplington 136 71 7 Clare Vincent 5 Cr. Lamont Lake 69 1 Parkersburg Cedar Falls C N Dunkerton 150 Petersburg Rickardsville Lizard Badger Lake Woolstock 65 57 Cr. Dundee Oneida New S. Ackley New Hartford 1 Little Vienna Bankston Dubuque 5 Pierson Lizard C N Littleton 187 140 59 110 Fork 57 H 1 H Sioux City Manson Cr. D E L A W A R E Asbury H Pomeroy 1 C N 14 Stout 57 Waterloo Galva Schaller Nemaha C N 17 4 H Manchester Fort Dodge White 7 Alden UP H 281 Graf Moville Correctionville Holstein 7 7 B U C H A N A N Delaware Earlville I A R R Dewar 20 C N Iowa Independence Masonville H H Dyersville 32 Big Jolley Barnum Blairsburg 1 58 Evansdale C N Centralia 20 Lawton Cr. H 4 Williams Jesup C N Farley 20 H C N Falls River 27 H Winthrop 20 Peosta Early C N C N Duncombe Webster City 4 Dike Elk Run Hts 20 U P H 52 1 Cushing Coalville 20 20 27 Raymond 20 4 Little Sioux Knierim 20 4 20 Delhi Epworth Bronson Moorland 20 20 20 Wellsburg 7 6 Lake H C A L H O U N Iowa 14 I C E River 1 1 5 6 Lake Delhi Worthington St. Kalo Briggs Woods 4 58 2 Silver 1 Sergeant Anthon River Rockwell City 20 2 20 Catherine River Sac City Lytton Lake 4 Lake 65 G R U N D Y Cr. Quasqueton 1 196 Otho R. Buckeye Owasa Washburn 38 1Bluff 20 I D A U P Kamrar 1 Gilbertville Wapsipinicon MISSOURI 3 Steamboat Holland Hudson North D U B U Q U E St. Donatus 5 W O O D B U R Y Moorehead Lake Ida Grove 3 5 Ryan Buck Cr. Callender U P 9 136 1 S A C River H A R D I N Rock 380 5 Sand 3 Somers B L A C K H A W K Hopkinton 151 Climbing Des R. Morrison Blackhawk Rowley 4 Luton 71 Lehigh H A M I L T O N 175 Voorhies Cedar Creek Springs Fork 52 Hill Lake 35 H 218 27 Brandon 150 61 Salix Fork H 69 Honey Eldora 31 C N Arthur Odebolt River Burnside 17 1 Grundy 13 Bernard La Motte U P View Boone 3 Radcliffe Browns Battle 175 Eagle Center C N 175 Rinard W E B S T E R Ellsworth 3 Hubbard Ivester Center Troy Mills Sioux C N La Porte City Lake Holly 175 Creek 4 Cr.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter 7050 Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Water Quality Division Waters of the State
    MINNESOTA RULES 1989 6711 WATERS OF THE STATE 7050.0130 CHAPTER 7050 MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY WATER QUALITY DIVISION WATERS OF THE STATE STANDARDS FOR THE PROTECTION OF THE 7050.0214 REQUIREMENTS FOR POINT QUALITY AND PURITY OF THE WATERS OF SOURCE DISCHARGERS TO THE STATE LIMITED RESOURCE VALUE 7050.0110 SCOPE. WATERS. 7050.0130 DEFINITIONS. 7050.0215 REQUIREMENTS FOR ANIMAL 7050.0140 USES OF WATERS OF THE STATE. FEEDLOTS. 7050.0150 DETERMINATION OF 7050.0220 SPECIFIC STANDARDS OF COMPLIANCE. QUALITY AND PURITY FOR 7050.0170 NATURAL WATER QUALITY. DESIGNATED CLASSES OF 7050.0180 NONDEGRADATION FOR WATERS OF THE STATE. OUTSTANDING RESOURCE CLASSIFICATIONS OF WATERS OF THE VALUE WATERS. STATE 7050.0185 NONDEGRADATION FOR ALL 7050.0400 PURPOSE. WATERS. 7050.0410 LISTED WATERS. 7050.0190 VARIANCE FROM STANDARDS. 7050.0420 TROUT WATERS. 7050.0200 WATER USE CLASSIFICATIONS 7050.0430 UNLISTED WATERS. FOR WATERS OF THE STATE. 7050.0440 OTHER CLASSIFICATIONS 7050.0210 GENERAL STANDARDS FOR SUPERSEDED. DISCHARGERS TO WATERS OF 7050.0450 MULTI-CLASSIFICATIONS. THE STATE. 7050.0460 WATERS SPECIFICALLY 7050.0211 FACILITY STANDARDS. CLASSIFIED. 7050.0212 REQUIREMENTS FOR POINT 7050.0465 MAP: MAJOR SURFACE WATER SOURCE DISCHARGERS OF DRAINAGE BASINS. INDUSTRIAL OR OTHER WASTES. 7050.0470 CLASSIFICATIONS FOR WATERS 7050.0213 ADVANCED WASTEWATER IN MAJOR SURFACE WATER TREATMENT REQUIREMENTS. DRAINAGE BASINS. 7050.0100 [Repealed, 9 SR 913] STANDARDS FOR THE PROTECTION OF THE QUALITY AND PURITY OF THE WATERS OF THE STATE 7050.0110 SCOPE. Parts 7050.0130 to 7050.0220 apply to all waters of the state, both surface and underground, and include general provisions applicable to the maintenance of water quality and aquatic habitats; definitions of water use classes; standards for dischargers of sewage, industrial, and other wastes; and standards of quality and purity for specific water use classes.
    [Show full text]
  • Missouri River Floodplain from River Mile (RM) 670 South of Decatur, Nebraska to RM 0 at St
    Hydrogeomorphic Evaluation of Ecosystem Restoration Options For The Missouri River Floodplain From River Mile (RM) 670 South of Decatur, Nebraska to RM 0 at St. Louis, Missouri Prepared For: U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 3 Minneapolis, Minnesota Greenbrier Wetland Services Report 15-02 Mickey E. Heitmeyer Joseph L. Bartletti Josh D. Eash December 2015 HYDROGEOMORPHIC EVALUATION OF ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION OPTIONS FOR THE MISSOURI RIVER FLOODPLAIN FROM RIVER MILE (RM) 670 SOUTH OF DECATUR, NEBRASKA TO RM 0 AT ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI Prepared For: U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 3 Refuges and Wildlife Minneapolis, Minnesota By: Mickey E. Heitmeyer Greenbrier Wetland Services Advance, MO 63730 Joseph L. Bartletti Prairie Engineers of Illinois, P.C. Springfield, IL 62703 And Josh D. Eash U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Region 3 Water Resources Branch Bloomington, MN 55437 Greenbrier Wetland Services Report No. 15-02 December 2015 Mickey E. Heitmeyer, PhD Greenbrier Wetland Services Route 2, Box 2735 Advance, MO 63730 www.GreenbrierWetland.com Publication No. 15-02 Suggested citation: Heitmeyer, M. E., J. L. Bartletti, and J. D. Eash. 2015. Hydrogeomorphic evaluation of ecosystem restoration options for the Missouri River Flood- plain from River Mile (RM) 670 south of Decatur, Nebraska to RM 0 at St. Louis, Missouri. Prepared for U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 3, Min- neapolis, MN. Greenbrier Wetland Services Report 15-02, Blue Heron Conservation Design and Print- ing LLC, Bloomfield, MO. Photo credits: USACE; http://statehistoricalsocietyofmissouri.org/; Karen Kyle; USFWS http://digitalmedia.fws.gov/cdm/; Cary Aloia This publication printed on recycled paper by ii Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The 2016-2017 Roadside Vegetation Survey of Scott County, Iowa
    FINAL REPORT: THE 2016-2017 ROADSIDE VEGETATION SURVEY OF SCOTT COUNTY, IOWA Submitted by Leland M. Searles, Owner Leeward Solutions, LLC December 25, 2017 Bob Bryant photographs Sullivant’s Milkweed in a Scott County roadside. Sullivant’s Milkweed is uncommon, but, like other milkweeds, it attracts Monarch butterflies for egg-laying and food. Bob joined the survey in 2016 and 2017 as a field assistant and expert on the county’s flora and botanical history. [this page intentionally blank] TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary Acknowledgements Introduction General description of Scott County Past botanical studies The landscape: Former ecosystems, geology, & topography Methods GIS data capture & data fields From-the-vehicle observations On-foot methods What is a remnant? Results Invasive species Indigenous species Possible misidentifications Woody growth in ROWs Residential encroachments Conclusions Roadsides as habitat Biogeography of Scott County plants Roadsides as seed resources Other uses of survey data Bibliography Appendices Scott County RVS Species Inventory, 2016 & 2017 Scott County Plant Communities Based on Survey Findings 10th Avenue Corridor: Remnant Plants & Plant Communities EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A Roadside Vegetation Survey (RVS) of Scott County, Iowa, was conducted by Leeward Solutions, LLC, under contract with Scott County Secondary Roads Department (SCSRD). The RVS occurred in two phases, with hard-surfaced roads surveyed in 2016 and gravel roads driven in 2017. Level B and C roads were not included, with only a few exceptions. The field component was completed in early September 2017. This final report contains information and conclusions based on both phases. The survey began on July 25, 2016, with training on GPS equipment.
    [Show full text]
  • Statistical Summaries of Selected Iowa Streamflow Data--Table 1
    Table 1 1 Table 1. Streamgages in Iowa included in this study. [no., number] Map Streamgage number Streamgage name Link to streamflow statistics for streamgage number (fig. 1) 1 05387440 Upper Iowa River at Bluffton, Iowa http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2015/1214/downloads/05387440_stats.docx 2 05387500 Upper Iowa River at Decorah, Iowa http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2015/1214/downloads/05387500_stats.docx 3 05388000 Upper Iowa River near Decorah, Iowa http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2015/1214/downloads/05388000_stats.docx 4 05388250 Upper Iowa River near Dorchester, Iowa http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2015/1214/downloads/05388250_stats.docx 5 05388500 Paint Creek at Waterville, Iowa http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2015/1214/downloads/05388500_stats.docx 6 05389000 Yellow River near Ion, Iowa http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2015/1214/downloads/05389000_stats.docx 7 05389400 Bloody Run Creek near Marquette, Iowa http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2015/1214/downloads/05389400_stats.docx 8 05389500 Mississippi River at McGregor, Iowa http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2015/1214/downloads/05389500_stats.docx 9 05411400 Sny Magill Creek near Clayton, Iowa http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2015/1214/downloads/05411400_stats.docx 10 05411600 Turkey River at Spillville, Iowa http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2015/1214/downloads/05411600_stats.docx 11 05411850 Turkey River near Eldorado, Iowa http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2015/1214/downloads/05411850_stats.docx 12 05412000 Turkey River at Elkader, Iowa http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2015/1214/downloads/05412000_stats.docx 13 05412020 Turkey River above French Hollow Creek at http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2015/1214/downloads/05412020_stats.docx
    [Show full text]
  • ROOT RIVER ONE WATERSHED, ONE PLAN -I- SWCD Soil and Water Conservation District
    Cold Snap Photography Prepared For: Root River Planning Partnership Prepared By: Houston Engineering, Inc. Photo by Bob Joachim Root River Watershed | ONE WATERSHED, ONE PLAN List of PLan Abbreviations i Plan Definitions iii Executive Summary iv 1. INTRODUCTION 1-1 1.1 Preamble 1-1 1.2 Plan Area 1-1 1.3 Watershed Characteristics 1-4 1.4 Plan Overview 1-4 1.5 Plan Partners and Roles in Plan Development 1-5 1.6 Incorporating Comments into the Plan __________________1-7 2. ANALYSIS AND PRIORITIZATION OF RESOURCES, CONCERNS, AND ISSUES CAUSING CONCERN 2-1 2.1 Definitions 2-1 2.2 Identifying Potential Resource Concerns and Issues 2-2 2.3 Prioritizing Potential Resource Concerns and Issues 2-13 2.4 Priority Resource Concerns and Issues 2-14 2.4.1 "A" Level Priorities 2-14 2.4.1.1 Description and Resource Concern Locations 2-14 2.4.1.2 Issues Affecting "A" Level Priority Resource Concerns 2-18 2.4.2 "B" Level Priorities 2-18 2.4.2.1 Description and Landscape Locations 2-18 2.4.2.2 Issues Affecting “B” Level Priority Resource Concerns 2-26 2.4.3 "C" Level Priorities 2-26 2.4.3.1 Issues Affecting “C” Level Priority Resource Concerns 2-35 2.5 Use of Priority Categories in Plan Implementation 2-35 2.6 Emerging Issues 2-35 2.6.1 "Scientific and Technical Emerging Issues 2-36 2.61.1 Climate Change and Infrastructure Resilience 2-36 2.6.1.2 Endocrine Active Compounds 2-37 2.6.1.3 Water Movement Within a Karst Landscape 2-37 2.6.1.4 Improving Soil Health 2-37 2.6.1.5 Buffers for Public Waters and Drainage Systems 2-38 2.6.1.6 Invasive Species 2-38 2.6.1.7
    [Show full text]
  • Delineation Percentage
    Lake Superior - North Rainy River - Headwaters Lake Superior - South Vermilion River Nemadji River Cloquet River Pine River Rainy River - Rainy Lake Little Fork River Mississippi River - Headwaters Leech Lake River Upper St. Croix River Root River Big Fork River Mississippi River - Winona Upper/Lower Red Lake Kettle River Mississippi River - Lake Pepin Mississippi River - Grand Rapids Mississippi River - La Crescent Crow Wing River Otter Tail River Mississippi River - Reno Mississippi River - Brainerd Zumbro River Redeye River Upper Big Sioux River Mississippi River - Twin Cities Snake River Des Moines River - Headwaters St. Louis River Rum River Lower Big Sioux River Lower St. Croix River Cottonwood River Minnesota River - Headwaters Cannon River Mississippi River - St. Cloud Long Prairie River Lake of the Woods Lower Rainy North Fork Crow River Mississippi River - Sartell Lac Qui Parle River Buffalo River Wild Rice River Minnesota River - Mankato Sauk River Rock River Redwood River Snake River Chippewa River Watonwan River Clearwater River East Fork Des Moines River Red River of the North - Sandhill River Upper Red River of the North Blue Earth River Red River of the North - Marsh River Roseau River Minnesota River - Yellow Medicine River Le Sueur River Little Sioux River Bois de Sioux River Cedar River Lower Minnesota River Pomme de Terre River Red Lake River Lower Des Moines River Upper Iowa River Red River of the North - Tamarac River Shell Rock River Two Rivers Rapid River Red River of the North - Grand Marais Creek Mustinka River South Fork Crow River Thief River Winnebago River Upper Wapsipinicon River 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% %Altered %Natural %Impounded %No Definable Channel wq-bsm1-06.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Introduction Ging Dams and Intense Storms Awith Subsequent Floods Have Led to at Least Ten Structural Failures at Iowa Dams in the Past Three Years
    11 Introduction ging dams and intense storms Awith subsequent floods have led to at least ten structural failures at Iowa dams in the past three years. This presents serious challenges, but also provides a chance to correct a legacy of problems not anticipated three to four generations ago when many small dams were constructed. New frameworks for low-head dam mitigation provide exciting opportunities to usher in a new legacy of enjoyment, respect, and care for the navigable waters of Iowa. Solving Dam Problems: Iowa’s 2010 Plan for Dam Mitigation provides an updated inventory, new naturalistic approaches to enhance rivers in dam mitigation projects, perspectives on flood reduction, and cost effective methods of reducing deaths at dams. 5 companion documents to this plan were 1a. The Role of Iowa’s 2010 developed: 1. A fully illustrated manual Develop- Plan for Dam Mitigation ing Water Trails in Iowa for water trails developers, in cluding planning guid- ance, standardized signage design, and incorporation of stream restoration and stormwater management concepts in ac- cess construction. 2. The state water trails plan Iowa Water Trails: Connecting People, Water and Resources, documenting the historic and present day importance of Iowa’s In 2008, the Iowa Department of Natural navigable waters, with comparisons of Resources was instructed to develop state- relevant data and strategies for adding wide plans for the newly formed water trails value to Iowa’s system. low-head dam public hazard programs. The low-head dam public hazard program Elements were to include an inventory of within the Iowa DNR was established in low-head dams, various mitigation design 2008 to reduce fatalities at traditionally templates and construction guidelines for designed dams.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Environmental Assessment Fishing Program for the Iowa River
    U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Draft Environmental Assessment Fishing Program for the Iowa River Corridor Project Port Louisa National Wildlife Refuge Regional Director Region 3, U. S. Fish and Wildlife Bloomington, MN 55111 Abstract: The United States Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) proposes to provide compatible fishing opportunities for game fish species on the Iowa River Corridor Project (IRCP) of Port Louisa National Wildlife Refuge located within 3 counties in east central Iowa. This draft environmental assessment evaluates three possible alternatives for fishing opportunities. The preferred alternative will establish compatible fishing opportunities while providing visitors with other priority public use opportunities i.e. hunting, wildlife observation, wildlife photography, environmental education and interpretation. The entire IRCP includes Service owned lands, Iowa Department of Natural Resources lands, and Natural Resources Conservation Service wetland easements. This environmental assessment involves only those lands owned in fee title by the Service. A fishing plan is being developed pursuant to the selection of an alternative. The general goals of a fishing program are to: 1. Provide safe and enjoyable fishing that is compatible with the IRCP purposes. 2. Provide quality angling opportunities that minimize conflict with other public use activities. 3. Contribute to a consistent regulatory framework across the patchwork of public and private holdings in the IRCP. 4. Provide opportunities to fish for species consistent with the laws and regulations of the State of Iowa that do not adversely affect local or regional populations, and are consistent with the 1997 National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act. For further information about the environmental assessment, please contact: Cathy Henry, Refuge Manager, Port Louisa National Wildlife Refuge, 10728 County Road X61, Wapello, Iowa 52653-9477.
    [Show full text]
  • 7050.0470 CLASSIFICATIONS for SURFACE WATERS in MAJOR DRAINAGE BASINS. Subpart 1. Lake Superior Basin. the Water Use Classifica
    1 REVISOR 7050.0470 7050.0470 CLASSIFICATIONS FOR SURFACE WATERS IN MAJOR DRAINAGE BASINS. Subpart 1. Lake Superior basin. The water use classifications for the listed waters in the Lake Superior basin are as identified in items A to D. See parts 7050.0425 and 7050.0430 for the classifications of waters not listed. A. Streams: (1) Ahlenius Creek, (T.53, R.14, S.9, 10): 1B, 2A, 3B; (2) Amenda Creek, (T.59, R.5, S.19, 20, 29, 30, 31; T.59, R.6, S.36): 1B, 2A, 3B; (3) Amity Creek, (T.50, R.13, S.5, 6; T.50, R.14, S.1; T.51, R.13, S.31, 32; T.51, R.14, S.26, 27, 28, 35, 36): 1B, 2A, 3B; (4) Amity Creek, East Branch (T.51, R.13, S.30, 31; T.51, R.14, S.13, 14, 15, 22, 24, 25, 36): 1B, 2A, 3B; (5) Anderson Creek, Carlton County, (T.46, R.17, S.11, 14, 15, 22, 26, 27): 1B, 2A, 3B; (6) Anderson Creek, St. Louis County, (T.49, R.15, S.16, 17, 18; T.49, R.16, S.12, 13): 1B, 2A, 3B; (7) Artichoke Creek, (T.52, R.17, S.7, 17, 18): 1B, 2A, 3B; (8) Assinika Creek, (T.63, R.1E, S.1; T.63, R.2E, S.7, 8, 16, 17, 21; T.64, R.1E, S.36; T.64, R.2E, S.31): 1B, 2A, 3B; (9) Bally Creek, (T.61, R.1W, S.3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11; T.61, R.2W, S.12): 1B, 2A, 3B; (10) Baptism River, East Branch, (T.57, R.6, S.6; T.57, R.7, S.1, 2, 3, 9, 10, 11, 12, 16, 17, 20; T.58, R.6, S.30, 31; T.58, R.7, S.13, 17, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 29, 30, 36; T.58, R.8, S.22, 23, 24, 25, 26): 1B, 2A, 3B; (11) Baptism River, Main Branch, (T.56, R.7, S.3, 4, 5, 9, 10, 14, 15; T.57, R.7, S.20, 27, 28, 29, 33, 34): 1B, 2A, 3B; (12) Baptism River, West Branch, (T.57, R.7, S.7, 17, 18, 20; T.57, R.8, S.1, 2, 12; T.58, R.8, S.2, 3, 4, 9, 10, 11, 15, 16, 20, 21, 22, 28, 33, 34, 35, 36; T.59, R.8, S.
    [Show full text]
  • Sediment Transport and Deposition in the Lower Missouri River During the 2011 Flood
    Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Sediment Transport and Deposition in the Lower Missouri River During the 2011 Flood Chapter F of 2011 Floods of the Central United States Professional Paper 1798–F U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Front cover. Top photograph: View of flooding from Nebraska City, Nebraska, looking east across the Missouri River, August 2, 2011. Photograph by Robert Swanson, U.S. Geological Survey. Right photograph: USGS scientist collecting a sediment sample from the Missouri River at Sioux City, Iowa, September 16, 2011. Photograph by Ryan Tompkins, U.S. Geological Survey. Back cover. Sand from the 2011 flood on the flood plain in northwestern Missouri, September 22, 2012. Photograph by Robert Jacobson, U.S. Geological Survey. Sediment Transport and Deposition in the Lower Missouri River During the 2011 Flood By Jason S. Alexander, Robert B. Jacobson, and David L. Rus Chapter F of 2011 Floods of the Central United States In cooperation with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Professional Paper 1798–F U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior SALLY JEWELL, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette M. Kimball, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2013 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Flood of August 24–25, 2016, Upper Iowa River and Turkey River, Northeastern Iowa
    Prepared in cooperation with the Iowa Department of Transportation and the Iowa Highway Research Board (Project HR–140) Flood of August 24–25, 2016, Upper Iowa River and Turkey River, Northeastern Iowa Upper Iowa River Basin Turkey River Basin IowaIowa IOWA Open-File Report 2017–1128 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Flood of August 24–25, 2016, Upper Iowa River and Turkey River, Northeastern Iowa By S. Mike Linhart and Padraic S. O’Shea Prepared in cooperation with the Iowa Department of Transportation and the Iowa Highway Research Board (Project HR–140) Open-File Report 2017–1128 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior RYAN K. ZINKE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey William H. Werkheiser, Deputy Director exercising the authority of the Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2018 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit https://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit https://store.usgs.gov. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text. Permission to reproduce copyrighted items must be secured from the copyright owner. Suggested citation: Linhart, S.M., and O’Shea, P.S., 2018, Flood of August 24–25, 2016, Upper Iowa River and Turkey River, northeastern Iowa: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Grand Sub-Basin
    Upper Grand Sub-basin HUC # 10280101 RAPID WATERSHED ASSESSMENT USDA NRCS 601 Business Loop 70 West Parkade Center, Suite 250 Columbia, MO 65203 Upper Grand Sub-basin HUC #10280101 Introduction ..................................................... Page 3 A rapid watershed assessment Physical Description ........................................... Page 4 (RWA) evaluates resource A. Land Use/ Land Cover...................................Page 4 conditions and needs on an B. Grassland ..................................................Page 6 8-digit hydrologic unit (HU) C. Crop History ..............................................Page 6 basis. The assessment identifies D. Public Land ...............................................Page 6 E. Soil Capability ............................................Page 7 the primary resource concerns F. Common Resources ......................................Page 9 for the watershed being profiled G. Streams.................................................. Page 10 and provides estimate as to H. Wetlands ................................................ Page 12 where conservation investments I. Relief Map................................................ Page 13 would best address the concerns J. Geology .................................................. Page 14 of landowners, conservation Resource Concerns............................................Page 16 districts, stakeholders, and A. Soils ...................................................... Page 18 others. The RWA provides B. Soil Erosion.............................................
    [Show full text]