[email protected] Tel: +27 (0)44 801 9477

J Fourie/I Huyser Town Planning Planning and Development E-Mail: Jfourie@George.Gov.Za / Ihuyser@George.Gov.Za Tel: +27 (0)44 801 9477

Enquiries: J Fourie/I Huyser Town Planning Planning and Development E-mail: [email protected] / [email protected] Tel: +27 (0)44 801 9477

Date: 9 November 2020

Applicant name: Delplan Consulting

Email Address: [email protected] and [email protected]

COMPLIANCE LETTER (SECTION 38 OF LUP BY-LAW, 2015)

APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION AND REZONING: PORTION 276 OF THE FARM KRAAIBOSCH NO. 195

The above-mentioned application submitted per email dated 29 October 2020 is deemed complete in terms of Section 38 of the Land Use Planning By-law for George Municipality, 2015.

Please email Lorraine Malangeni at [email protected]. providing this compliance letter to obtain an invoice (application fees) for the following:

• Rezoning (Agriculture) • Subdivision (Portion A and Remainder)

Once payment is done, the complete application (all required documents) with the proof of payment and this letter must be emailed to Lorraine Malangeni at [email protected] for further processing and acknowledgement of receipt.

Once acknowledgement of receipt has been received, the applicant may advertise the application in accordance with the Public Participation Instruction available on the municipality’s website.

The applicant shall also obtain comments from the following external departments and interested and affected parties as indicated in the table below.

DEPARTMENT/BODY DEPARTMENT/BODY National - Environmental Affairs Western Cape Dept. Social Development DEA&DP – Environmental Affairs TRANSNET DEA&DP – Planning and Development X ESKOM Heritage Western Cape Western Cape Dept. Mineral Resources Dept. Agriculture (National) Western Cape Dept. of Health Western Cape Dept. Agriculture (Elsenburg) X Western Cape Dept. of Education Dept. of Agriculture, Forestry & Fishery (DAFF) Farmers Association Dept. Water Affairs (Western Cape) Home Owners Association (Carmel) X Cape Nature Wilderness & Lakes Environmental Action Forum SANPARKS Ratepayers Association (Wilderness) SANRAL Ratepayers Association (Hoekwil) Dept. Transport & Public Works (DRE) X Ratepayers Association (Herolds Bay) Environmental Health (Garden Route District Wilderness (1921) Company (Pty) Ltd Municipality) Town Planning (Garden Route District Civil Aviation Authority Municipality)

Dept. Rural Development & Land Reform Ward Councilor X Western Cape Dept. Economic Development Other

Note: All state departments and organs of the state must be provided 60 days to comment on applications.

Please be advised that the Municipality may request additional information or documentation deemed necessary to consider the application in terms of Section 42 of the Land Use Planning By-law for George Municipality, 2015.

Yours faithfully

pp D.POWER ACTING DIRECTOR: PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT

Our Ref.: 1090/GEO/20 Your Ref.: Kraaibosch 195/276

29 October 2020

The Municipal Manager George Municipality PO Box 19 GEORGE 6530

ATTENTION: MR. CLINTON PETERSEN BY EMAIL

Dear Mr. Petersen,

PROPOSED SUBDIVISION: KRAAIBOSCH 195/276, GEORGE MUNICIPALITY AND DIVISION

1. The above matter refers.

2. Attached hereto find the following documents:

• Power of attorney • Title Deed, certificate of consolidation & SG diagram • Bondholders’ consent • Conveyancers’ certificate • Locality map • Draft subdivision plan • Letter from DEADP • Pre-Consultation application form • Application form

3. We trust that you will be able to process the application as soon as possible.

DEVELOPMENT•ENVIRONMENT•LINK

Member: Delarey Viljoen Pr. Pln – A/1021/1998 M.URP Delarey Viljoen CC t/a DELplan Consulting Reg. No. CK 1998 / 055850 / 23

Yours Faithfully, DELplan Urban & Regional Planning

DELAREY VILJOEN Pr. Pln N:\PROJECTS\2020\1090-GEO-20\Korrespondensie\1b.doc

Cc: The Carmel Evangelical Trust

DEVELOPMENT•ENVIRON MENT•LINK

Member: Delarey Viljoen Pr. Pln – A/1021/1998 M.URP Delarey Viljoen CC t/a DELplan Consulting Reg. No. CK 1998 / 055850 / 23

PROPOSED APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION & REZONING ON KRAAIBOSCH 195/276, GEORGE MUNICIPALITY AND DIVISION

FOR: CARMEL EVANGELICAL TRUST

DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENT LINK Proposed subdivision and rezoning of Kraaibosch 195/276 Ref No: 1090/GEO/20 Municipality and Division

CONTENTS

1. INTRODUCTION ...... 3 1.1 Title deed ...... 3 1.2 Land Use Application ...... 4 2. CONTEXTUAL INFORMATION ...... 4 2.1 The locality of the subject property ...... 4 2.2 Existing Land Uses and Character of the Area...... 6 2.3 Zoning ...... 6 2.4 Site Characteristics ...... 7 2.4.1 Topography ...... 7 2.4.2 Soil Conditions and Geology ...... 7 2.4.3 Vegetation ...... 7 3 DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL ...... 9 3.1 Proposed Development ...... 9 3.2 Accessibility ...... 10 3.3 Engineering Services ...... 10 4 RELEVANT SPATIAL PLANNING POLICIES ...... 10 4.1 Exiting Policy Frameworks ...... 10 4.1.1 George Integrated Development Plan (IDP) (2017/2022) ...... 10 4.1.2 George Municipal Spatial Development Framework (2019) ...... 10 4.1.3 Pre-Application in terms of George Municipality’s ...... 13 5 STATUTORY FRAMEWORKS ...... 14 5.1 Spatial Planning and Land Use Management Act, 2013 (ACT 16 OF 2013) (SPLUMA) ...... 14 5.2 Land Use Planning Act (LUPA) ...... 16 5.3.1 Compliance/consistency with spatial policy directives ...... 16 5.3.2 Need ...... 16 5.3.3 Desirability ...... 17 6. CONCLUSION ...... 18

FIGURES

FIGURE 1: THE TEMPORARY SERVITUDE THAT HAS BEEN CANCELLED...... 4 FIGURE 2: THE LOCATION OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IN RELATION TO GEORGE AND MAJOR ROADS (SOURCE: CAPE FARM MAPPER, 2020)...... 5 FIGURE 3: AN EXTRACT OF SATELLITE IMAGERY (SOURCE: CAPE FARM MAPPER, 2020) OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY (INDICATED IN RED) TOGETHER WITH THE IMMEDIATELY SURROUNDING LAND USES...... 5 FIGURE 4: SLOPE PERCENTAGE CLASSIFICATION OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY...... 7 FIGURE 6: CRITICAL BIODIVERSITY AREA’S LOCATED ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY...... 8 FIGURE 7: THE SUBJECT PROPERTY LOCATED NEXT TO THE SCENIC ROUTE TO VICTORIA BAY...... 11

October 2020 1 Proposed subdivision and rezoning of Kraaibosch 195/276 Ref No: 1090/GEO/20 Municipality and Division

ANNEXURES

1. POWER OF ATTORNEY 2. TITLE DEED, CERTIFICATE OF CONSOLIDATION & SG DIAGRAM 3. BONDHOLDERS CONSENT 4. CONVEYANCERS CERTIFICATE 5. LOCALITY MAP 6. DRAFT SUBDIVISION PLAN 7. LETTER FROM DEADP 8. PRE-CONSULTATION APPLICATION FORM 9. APPLICATION FORM

October 2020 2 Proposed subdivision and rezoning of Kraaibosch 195/276 Ref No: 1090/GEO/20 Municipality and Division

PROPOSED SUBDIVISION AND REZONING OF KRAAIBOSCH 195/276, GEORGE MUNICIPALITY AND DIVISION

1. INTRODUCTION

DELplan Consulting was appointed by the registered owner of Kraaibosch 195/276, George, referred hereafter as the “subject property”, to prepare and submit the required land use application for the subdivision and rezoning of the subject property. A copy of the Power of Attorney and the Trust Resolution to submit this land use application is attached as Annexure 1.

The cadastral land unit subject to this application is as follows:

• Kraaibosch 195/276, George District and Municipality. Located at 33°59'50.8"S 22°31'58.8"E

This subject property currently has inter alia approval for 25 “Resort Zone II: Holiday housing” in terms of Section 8 Scheme Regulations. This holiday housing is zoned as “Non- Conforming Use”. In terms of the Integrated Zoning Scheme the northern portion that is zoned for “Agricultural Zone I”, the southern portion that is zoned “Open Space Zone III: Nature conservation area” and a small portion that is zoned as “Community Zone II: Place of Worship”. The current historical Carmel Christian Guest Farm is also situated on the farm.

The owner wants to subdivide a portion from the subject property and rezone the property from “Agricultural Zone I: Agricultural” to “Agricultural Zone II: Smallholding”

1.1 Title deed

The Title Deed T012780/2003 refers to Kraaibosch 195/276 registered in the name of The Carmel Evangelical Trust. The last-mentioned deed describes that the property is 46, 5602ha in extent. The SG Diagram, the title deed and the certificate of the consolidated property is attached hereafter as Annexure 2.

The property is registered with a bondholder and their consent is attached as Annexure 3.

It must be noticed that the property has a temporary right-of-way servitude that was registered as lines bc and cd of 6-meters wide as shown on plan 4329/2002. This servitude has been cancelled on page 23 in the Certificate of Consolidated Title T12780/2003.

October 2020 3 Proposed subdivision and rezoning of Kraaibosch 195/276 Ref No: 1090/GEO/20 Municipality and Division

Figure 1: The temporary servitude that has been cancelled.

The Title Deed has been scrutinized and it contains no restrictions that will prohibit the proposed development. The conveyancer’s certificate is attached as Annexure 4 to this report.

1.2 Land Use Application

• Subdivision in terms of Section 15(2) (d) of the George Municipality: Land Use Planning By-Law (2015) of Kraaibosch 195/276, into Portion A (± 1, 0162ha) and the Remainder of Kraaibosch 195/276 (±45, 544 ha). • Rezone in terms of Section 15(2) (a) of the George Municipality: Land Use Planning By-Law (2015) of Portion A (± 1, 0162ha) from “Agricultural Zone I: Agricultural” to “Agricultural Zone II: Smallholding”.

2. CONTEXTUAL INFORMATION

2.1 The locality of the subject property

The subject property earmarked for the proposed subdivision and rezoning is situated in Kraaibosch South which can be defined as a semi-rural area. There are several resorts, guest houses and lifestyle small-holdings in the vicinity. The property is located outside the urban edge and located in the 2km from Victoria Bay which is a small (rural) town according to the SDF of George. Figure 1 below indicates the subject property, in relation to George. Figure 2 gives a closer look at the subject property and surrounding area.

October 2020 4 Proposed subdivision and rezoning of Kraaibosch 195/276 Ref No: 1090/GEO/20 Municipality and Division

Subject property

Indian Ocean

Figure 2: The location of the subject property in relation to George and major roads (Source: Cape Farm Mapper, 2020).

Proposed subdivision

Figure 3: An extract of satellite imagery (Source: Cape Farm Mapper, 2020) of the subject property (indicated in red) together with the immediately surrounding land uses.

No significant historic buildings, ruins, gravesites or any other heritage-related activities and objects are evident within the landscape. A locality plan is attached hereto as Annexure 5.

October 2020 5 Proposed subdivision and rezoning of Kraaibosch 195/276 Ref No: 1090/GEO/20 Municipality and Division

2.2 Existing Land Uses and Character of the Area

This subject property currently has approval for the following:

• 25 “Resort Zone II: Holiday housing” in terms of Section 8 Scheme Regulations. • “Agricultural Zone I” • “Open Space Zone III: Nature conservation area” • “Community Zone II: Place of Worship”.

The subject property is currently developed with 15 out of the 25 “Resort Zone II: Holiday housing”. Some of these holiday houses have a footprint surrounding the properties that are zoned “Resort Zone”. The rest of the northern portion is zoned as “Agricultural Zone I”.

The Carmel Coastal Retreat which is zoned as “Resort Zone” and the Bridge Ministries that is zoned as “Community Zone II: Place of Worship” to the southern portion of the property. The rest of the property is zoned as “Open Space Zone III: Nature conservation area”.

The surrounding properties are mostly associated with agricultural small-holding properties to the east, small holdings to the west, and a nature conservation area with tourist accommodation to the south, agricultural small-holdings and a nature conservation area to the north.

The subdivision will not affect the visual impact and will comply with the minimum property size of the area. Thus, it will not change the sense of place since only 1ha will be subdivided. Thus, the proposed development will not disrupt the character of the area. The previous structure plans and SDF’s earmarked the area for small-holdings of a minimum of 1Ha.

2.3 Zoning

• This subject property currently is zoned for “Agricultural Zone I”, the southern portion that is zoned “Open Space Zone III: Nature conservation area” and a small portion that is zoned as “Community Zone II: Place of Worship”. The subject property also has 25 “Resort Zone II: Holiday housing” in terms of Section 8 Scheme Regulations.

October 2020 6 Proposed subdivision and rezoning of Kraaibosch 195/276 Ref No: 1090/GEO/20 Municipality and Division

2.4 Site Characteristics

2.4.1 Topography

The landscape of the subject property has a moderate slope in the north which is characterized by 0-10% slope. The portion that will be subdivided (marked in Figure 3 below) has a slope of 10-30%. This entails that the proposed subdivision has a relatively flat surface on which development can occur.

Subject Property

Figure 4: Slope Percentage Classification of the subject property.

2.4.2 Soil Conditions and Geology

The Western Cape Soils (Layer) (Cape Farm Mapper) describes that this property is associated with clay that has a strong texture.

The geology of the property is mostly covered with “gneissic granite and granodiorite, as well as phyllite, schist, grit, hornfels and quartzite of the Kaaimans Group, and quartzitic sandstone of the Table Mountain Group, Cape Supergroup.”

This mixture of soil and the geology of the property means that it can be developed upon.

2.4.3 Vegetation

The National Vegetation Map, 2018, indicate that the vegetation on the site comprises Groot Brak Dune Strandveld. As already mentioned, the proposed subdivided portion is already been disturbed and cleared.

October 2020 7 Proposed subdivision and rezoning of Kraaibosch 195/276 Ref No: 1090/GEO/20 Municipality and Division

According to the information, the subject property has a Critical Biodiversity Area’s (CBA) or Ecological Support Areas. The terrestrial (which is marked as CBA) is located to the south- east and south of the property and is zoned as “Open Space Zone III: Nature conservation area”. There are also no watercourses present on the subject property.

Proposed subdivision

Figure 5: Critical Biodiversity Area’s located on the subject property.

The definition of the CBA Terrestrial is “areas in a natural condition that are required to meet biodiversity, for species, ecosystems or ecological processes and infrastructure”. The objective of the area earmarked is to “maintain in a natural or near-natural state, with no further loss of natural habitat. Degraded areas should be rehabilitated. Only low-impact, biodiversity land uses are appropriate.” This is only applicable to the area south of the subject property. As seen in Figure 3 above,

It must be noted that the subject property was never utilized for agricultural purposes and that this portion of the property is underutilized. Thus, the subdivision of this portion can be seen as acceptable.

In light of the above, it is argued that the site is not deemed to be environmentally sensitive or hold any conservation significance. Thus, no listed activities as contemplated by the National Environmental Management Act, 1998 (as amended) (NEMA) are triggered by this subdivision application. The property already has development rights in the form of a primary dwelling.

October 2020 8 Proposed subdivision and rezoning of Kraaibosch 195/276 Ref No: 1090/GEO/20 Municipality and Division

3 DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL

3.1 Proposed Development

This section of the report motivates the subdivision and the rezoning of the subject property to allow the property to be divided into Portion A and the remainder of the subject property and be rezoned from agricultural to smallholding. The subdivided property will be sold off and it will be made clear to the new owner and the architect that the proposed new development must comply with the parameters associated with “Agricultural Zone II: Smallholding”.

The owner of the property seized the opportunity to subdivide Kraaibosch 195/276 into Portion A (±1, 0162ha) and the Remainder of Kraaibosch 195/276 (±45, 544) to sell of the underutilized property. The proposed subdivision plan is attached as Annexure 6.

This subdivided portion will be rezoned from agricultural to smallholding since the area is mostly associated with smallholdings that are developed with low-density developments. Thus, it is acceptable to rezone the subdivided property to a smallholding since it will complement the surrounding properties.

It can be noticed that the subdivided property is large enough to accommodate a dwelling house. The buildable area is ±9016m² which is more than enough to develop the property. If the contours of the proposed development are studied carefully, it can be noticed that the property is mostly flat and will not negatively affect the proposed dwelling on the subdivided property.

The subdivided property will have new 10-meter building lines in terms of the new zoning. The man-made dam on the east of the subdivided portion will be located in the side building line. It can be claimed that the building line will preserve the dam and its natural beauty.

Regarding the public road, the property has more than enough space to develop to the south (as previously mentioned) and the road will not negatively affect any future construction. According to the zoning scheme, the road in the north will also be located in the 5-meter building line.

A new entrance will be created for the Remainder on the southern side and a 4-meter wide right-of-way servitude will be registered in favour of the new subdivided portion.

October 2020 9 Proposed subdivision and rezoning of Kraaibosch 195/276 Ref No: 1090/GEO/20 Municipality and Division

3.2 Accessibility

The proposed development will get access from a 4-meter wide right-of-way servitude as indicated on the subdivision plan. The subject property gets indirect access from the public road, namely Victoria Bay Road via the Carmel road.

3.3 Engineering Services

The property is located in an already developed and serviced rural residential area. The subdivided property (Portion A) will get new water and electrical connection. This area does not have a sewage system and the newly developed dwelling must install a septic tank.

Thus, the necessary engineering services are available for the proposed development. Capital contributions for the new erf will be paid accordingly.

4 RELEVANT SPATIAL PLANNING POLICIES

4.1 Exiting Policy Frameworks

This section briefly addresses the relevant spatial policy frameworks that provide guidance to development proposals in general and its applicability to this proposed development. These include:

4.1.1 George Integrated Development Plan (IDP) (2017/2022)

The IDP is a broad municipal-wide plan. This plan seeks to integrate and balance the economic, ecological and social pillars of sustainability without compromising effective service delivery. The subject property forms part of Ward 11. Various development needs were identified for this ward, however, none of the needs applies to this application.

The IDP was reviewed and it was found that no specific reference is made to the subject property. The proposal is, therefore, not considered to be in conflict with the IDP.

4.1.2 George Municipal Spatial Development Framework (2019)

The newly approved SDF has developed spatial strategies and supporting policies to support the spatial planning approach to direct and manage development in the Greater George Area and the George city area. The SDF explains that development must endeavour the following aspects:

October 2020 10 Proposed subdivision and rezoning of Kraaibosch 195/276 Ref No: 1090/GEO/20 Municipality and Division

• Consolidate: Making what we have work better for our people. • Strengthen: Build on George’s foundations for growth and resilience. • Smart Growth: Invest in catalysts for social and economic prosperity.

The above-mentioned document states that “The full potential of George’s assets has not been fully realised.” (GMSDF, 2019, p.48). This statement is an indicator that George has a lot of properties that must be developed to its fullest potential. This means that the George city area can grow without impinging on the natural and rural environment land and that there are enough under-utilised land/properties within the urban edge that can cater for urban growth, to optimising the use of existing infrastructure and containing operational costs. It must be stated that the GMSDF do not refer to large under-utilized properties but refer to smaller properties also, similar to the subject property, which can be better utilised for low-density residential expansion.

The subject property is currently underutilised and is ideally located to be subdivided. It must be noted that the subject property is located in a low-density area that is associated with smallholdings, holiday accommodation and nature reserves that protects the natural beauty. The subdivision will not be deviated from this standard and will have new zoning that is associated with low-density development.

According to Map 13 (GMSDF, 2019, p. 36), the subject property next to the scenic route to Victoria Bay and that a Go-George bus route (which form part of Phase 5) will be developed in the future along with the subject property.

Figure 6: The subject property located next to the scenic route to Victoria Bay.

October 2020 11 Proposed subdivision and rezoning of Kraaibosch 195/276 Ref No: 1090/GEO/20 Municipality and Division

The above-mentioned map confirms that the subject property is not directly addressed in the GMSDF but that the following policies address the nature of the proposed subdivision and rezoning of the property.

Lastly, GMSDF (2019) created policies that will promote these objectives. The policies that apply to this proposed development is:

Policy C: “Maintain a compact settlement form to achieve better efficiency in service delivery and resource use, and to facilitate inclusion and integration.” This policy has subcategories that are applicable as well, namely:

Policy C2 stipulates that settlements patterns must be restructured through infill development of vacant and underutilised land in the settlements in the George Municipal Area.

• Although the subject property is not located in the urban area of George, it must be noted that the subdivided property is underutilized, vacant and that the property is too small of agricultural activities. Thus, the proposed development will justify this properties potential to be developed and be utilized.

Policy D: “Manage the use of land in the Municipal area in a manner which protects natural ecosystem functioning and values ecosystem services, respecting that these are assets that underpin the economy and settlement and their resilience.” This policy has subcategories that are applicable as well, namely:

Policy D1: “Support and maintain the functionality of biodiversity areas.”

• The subject property is located in a picturesque area which has beautiful fauna and flora, is not located in a biodiversity sensitive area and was never utilized for agricultural purposes. • The subdivision of the property to develop a dwelling house, and possible an additional dwelling, can be seen as acceptable will not harm the biodiversity.

Policy E: “Safeguard the municipality’s farming and forestry areas as productive landscapes, equal in value to urban land.” This policy has subcategories that are applicable as well, namely:

Policy E2: “The subdivision of rural land into small holdings is not supported.”

October 2020 12 Proposed subdivision and rezoning of Kraaibosch 195/276 Ref No: 1090/GEO/20 Municipality and Division

• As previously explained, the subject property was never utilized for agricultural purposes and was developed with holiday accommodation since the property is too small. Also, a large portion of the property has indigenous plants and trees. • The character of the area is also associated with smallholdings and that the proposed smallholding will fit into the rural context and the character.

The GSDF also stipulates that “the National Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (Land Use and Soil Management) responsible for the Subdivision of Agricultural Land Act, no 70 of 1970 has embarked on a process of demarcating/updating the areas within all municipalities of the Western Cape not subject to the provisions of this Act.” We have contacted the Department of Environmental Affairs and Development Planning (DEADP) to establish if the subject property is subject to an Act 70 of 1970 application. The last- mentioned department indicated in their letter, dated 25 August 2020, that the subject property is exempt from the provisions of the Subdivision of Agricultural Land Act, 1970 (Act 70 of 1970).” This letter is attached as Annexure 7.

Annexure 1 of the GSDF also indicates that the area surrounding Victoria Bay/Kraaibosch South can be subdivided but land use application must be managed in a manner that “the rural and scenic character of the area and do not place an additional burden on service infrastructure.”

The subject property adheres to this policy and the proposed subdivision and rezoning fits into the character of the area. Moreover, the services for the additional property is available and the subdivision will not be a burden on the scenic character of the area.

These policies above are evidence that the proposed development is in line with the GMSDF and that it contributes to the character of the area.

4.1.3 Pre-Application in terms of George Municipality’s

A pre-application was done with a Municipal Town Planner. The Town Planner stipulated that the application may be submitted for consideration. The following comments came out of the pre-application:

• Town Planning: ◦ Indicate the access on the site plan. ◦ HOA’s consent required as well as all the owners of Carmel affected by this proposal. ◦ Zoning rectification is required. ◦ The subdivision portion must be rezoned to Agricultural Zone II

October 2020 13 Proposed subdivision and rezoning of Kraaibosch 195/276 Ref No: 1090/GEO/20 Municipality and Division

• CES: Access via existing private roads as per access servitude.

All of the comments were discussed in this report. The signed pre-application is attached to the report as Annexure 8.

5 STATUTORY FRAMEWORKS

Following the most recent legislative and procedural changes that have become applicable to the management of land use planning in South Africa, and consequently the Western Cape Province, it is considered necessary to summarise the implications of the current statutory framework within the context of this land-use planning application. Set out below are a set of principles and ethical conventions related to this application.

5.1 Spatial Planning and Land Use Management Act, 2013 (ACT 16 OF 2013) (SPLUMA)

Section 7 of SPLUMA lists the five development principles that apply to spatial planning, land use development and land use management namely (each of which to be elaborated on);

1. Spatial justice refers to the need for improved access and use of land in order to readdress past spatial and development imbalances as well as the need for SDF’s and relevant planning policies, spatial planning mechanisms, land use management systems and land development procedures to address these imbalances.

• This development will also contribute to the character of the surrounding area. • The owner of the subdivided portion will develop according to the use of rights.

2. Spatial sustainability refers to the need for spatial planning and land use management systems to promote land development that is viable and feasible within a South African context, to ensure the protection of agricultural land and maintain environmental management mechanisms. It furthermore relates to the need to promote effective/ equitable land markets, whilst considering the cost implications of future development on infrastructure and social services as well as the need to limit urban sprawl and ensure viable communities.

• This development complies with the Western Cape Provincial Spatial Development Framework (2013) as a spatial tool to guide future development on a provincial level. • This development complies with the George Municipal Local Municipality’s Spatial Development Framework (2019) as a tool to guide future development within George Local Municipality.

October 2020 14 Proposed subdivision and rezoning of Kraaibosch 195/276 Ref No: 1090/GEO/20 Municipality and Division

• The subject property was never been utilized for agricultural purposes and the subdivision can be seen as acceptable. • The necessary infrastructure is available to service the additional portion.

3. Efficiency relates to the need for optimal use of existing resources and infrastructure, decision- making that minimizes negative financial, social, economic or environmental impacts and development application procedures that are efficient and streamlined.

• The proposed development will optimize existing resources related to the subject property that will not have a financial, social, economic or environmental impact on the subject property and the surrounding properties. • The development will make use of existing local resources and contribute to specialized skills development within the municipality. • The proposed development’s aesthetical appearance which will contribute to the character of the surrounding area promoting sustainable development and to minimize the negative impact on the surrounding area.

4. Spatial resilience refers to the extent to which spatial plans, policies and land use management systems are flexible and accommodating to ensure sustainable livelihoods in communities most likely to suffer the impacts of economic and environmental shocks.

• The proposed development complies with the following spatial development frameworks: o Western Cape Provincial Spatial Development Framework; and o George Municipal Spatial Development Framework (2019). • The GMSDF (2019) indicates that the vacant and underutilized properties can be developed as infill development alongside bus routes. • This development also complies with George Municipality's land use management scheme.

5. Good administration refers to the obligation on all spheres of government to ensure implementation of the above efficiently, responsibly and transparently.

• This principle has no direct bearing on the application. George Municipality should consider the application within the prescribed timeframes. Public participation must be transparent with policies and legislation. Procedures should be clear to inform and empower members of the public.

October 2020 15 Proposed subdivision and rezoning of Kraaibosch 195/276 Ref No: 1090/GEO/20 Municipality and Division

5.2 Land Use Planning Act (LUPA)

The development objectives entrenched in SPLUMA have been assimilated into the Western Cape Land Use Planning Act, 2014 (Act 3 of 2014) and sets out a basis for the adjudication of land use planning applications in the province. It requires that local municipalities have due regard to at least the following when doing so:

• Applicable spatial development frameworks; • Applicable structure plans; • Land use planning principles referred to in Chapter VI (Section 59); • The desirability of the proposed land use; and • Guidelines that may be issued by the Provincial Minister regarding the desirability of proposed land use.

The land-use planning principles of LUPA (Section 59) is, in essence, the expansion of the five development principles of SPLUMA listed above.

5.3.1 Compliance/consistency with spatial policy directives

Section 19(1) and (2) of LUPA states that the following:

“(1) If a spatial development framework or structure plan specifically provides for the utilisation or development of land as proposed in a land use application or a land development application, the proposed utilisation or development is regarded as complying with that spatial development framework or structure plan;

(2) If a spatial development framework or structure plan does not specifically provide for the utilisation or development of land as proposed in a land use application or a land development application, but the proposed utilisation or development does not conflict with the purpose of the relevant designation in the spatial development framework or structure plan, the utilisation or development is regarded as being consistent with that spatial development framework or structured plan.”

As addressed under Section 4, it is clear that the application is compliant with the spatial policies, specifically the George Municipality’s Spatial Development Framework (2019).

5.3.2 Need

The need for a development primarily refers to the timing of the development and whether the development is needed at this time. Consistency with approved planning and land use policy is an important consideration of the need.

October 2020 16 Proposed subdivision and rezoning of Kraaibosch 195/276 Ref No: 1090/GEO/20 Municipality and Division

The proposed development is in line with the George Spatial Development Framework. The GMSDF (2019) indicates that there is a large need for infill development in the medium- and long term and to utilize the underutilized property.

5.3.3 Desirability

The concept “desirability” in the land use planning context may be defined as the degree of acceptability of a proposed development on land units concerned or the proposed rezoning of a property. This section expresses the desirability of the proposed subdivision and rezoning of the subdivided portion, taken in conjunction with the development principles and criteria set out through the statutory planning framework listed above, as well as the degree to which this proposal may be considered within the context of broader public interest. It is our view that the initial investigation into the desirability of the proposal reveals no obvious negative impacts.

The GMSDF (2019) states that “The full potential of George’s assets has not been fully realised.” (GMSDF, 2019, p.48). This is evident that the proposed development is desirable since the property can be subdivided to accommodate an additional portion.

As discussed in section 4, the portion on the subject property is currently underutilised and is ideally located to be subdivided. It must be noted that the subject property is located in a low-density area that is associated with smallholdings, holiday accommodation and nature reserves that protects the natural beauty. The subdivision will not be deviated from this standard and will be earmarked with zoning that is associated with low-density development.

Although the subject property is not located in the urban area of George, it must be noted that the subdivided property is underutilized that the property is too small of agricultural activities. Thus, the proposed development will justify this properties potential to be developed and be utilized.

Also, the subdivision of the property to develop a dwelling house, and possible an additional dwelling, can be seen as acceptable will not harm the biodiversity.

It was mentioned that the subject property was never utilized for agricultural purposes and was developed with holiday accommodation since the property is too small. Thus, it can be seen as more desirable to develop the subdivided portion.

The character of the area is also associated with smallholdings and that the proposed smallholding will fit into the rural context and the character.

October 2020 17 Proposed subdivision and rezoning of Kraaibosch 195/276 Ref No: 1090/GEO/20 Municipality and Division

Given the above, the proposed development is considered desirable according to the GMSDF (2019) and the George Municipality’s Integrated Zoning Scheme (2017).

6. CONCLUSION

We believe that the above-mentioned principles, considerations and guidelines for this land use application for Kraaibosch 195/276 satisfy the applicable legislation. As a result, it is trusted that this application can be finalized successfully.

DELAREY VILJOEN Pr. Pln OCTOBER 2020

October 2020 18

TRUST RESOLUTION - THE CARMEL EVANGELICAL TRUST

This resolution was passed by all the Trustees by email circulation during the days to 18 August 2020 It was resolved that BRIAN EDWARDS (I.D. 461030 5120 08 3), is appointed as representative for the above entity, the owner of Portion 276 of Farm Kraaibosch 195, George Division, Western Cape Province, to sign a power of attorney to appoint DELplan Consulting to act on behalf of the trust in relation to the necessary land use applications in terms of the George Municipality: Land Use Planning By-Law, 2015 for the above property This decision was approved by all parties concerned:

TRUSTEES:

BRIAN EDWARDS (I.D. 461030 5120 08 3)

IAN BERNARD BUCHEL (I.D. 621207 5156 08 8)

PAULA AUDREY BUCHEL (I.D. 681021 0175 08 5)

PETER-GRAEME LOWELL BRODRICK (I.D 781209 5074 08 5)

LATHICIA KLACKERS (I.D. 460526 0095 08 0)

BERYL ANN PHILLIPS (I.D. 480921 0115 08 5)

I, BRIAN EDWARDS (I.D. 4610305120083), hereby accept my appointment as representative of the above entity without any objections.

B. Edwards

TRUST RESOLUTION - THE CARMEL EVANGELICAL TRUST

TRUSTEES:

BRIAN EDWARDS (I.D. 461030 5120 08 3)

IAN BERNARD BUCHEL (I.D. 621207 5156 08 8)

PAULA AUDREY BUCHEL (I.D. 681021 0175 08 5)

PETER-GRAEME LOWELL BRODRICK (I.D 781209 5074 08 5)

LATHICIA KLACKERS (I.D. 460526 0095 08 0)

BERYL ANN PHILLIPS (I.D. 480921 0115 08 5)

I, BRIAN EDWARDS (I.D. 4610305120083), hereby accept my appointment as representative of the above entity without any objections.

B. Edwards

26465 24847 25576 25774 152 26537 25634 26516 25609 25622 25773 25626 195/ 26491 357 25611 356 195/ 150 153 154

25541 2 5 7 8 0 151 0 195/78 25537

195/225 195/353 25538 195/226 363 362

195/227195/332 673 195/389 1 0 0 195/78 15 /5 195/382 195/262 5 194/50 9 194/47 151/1 195/331 9 1 1

5 3 / 6 5 195/400 194/4 195/342 1017 9 9 1 195/378 1 1 8 2 195/77 195/24 3 0 /3 3 5 195/379 2 9 / 1 195/238 194/54356/1 195/26 5 9 9 195/392 195/381 3 1 1 9 355/1 2 194/53 195/29 / 195/271 5/ 1637 381 5 40 298/1 9 5 195/237195/334 0 3 195/351638 1 4 195/81 / 5 1 195/337 3 1 5 6 195/34 1 9 9 9 6 5 5 9 5 / 5 1 3 2 6 5 / 5 1 2 195/338 9 2 1 0 / / 9 9 194/52 5 195/33 2 5 8 4 /2 5 195/339 4 9 4 8 9 1 6 1745 / 9 195/31 2569 1 7

7 6 195/340195/330 5 1 / 354 9 7 1 / 5 5 9 2 /8 6 195/390 5 2 9 / 195/10 / 5 8 0 2 1957 1 5 5 7 1 4 4 1 6 / 195/288 /2 6 9 / 195/11 9 4 5 5 19 1 5 5 4 9 2 9 195/401 / 1 195/360 195/292 2 / 1 195/163 195/46 4 5 0 0 9 3 9 195/250 9 7 195/295 2 7 6 1 5 / 6 1 2 2 / / 5 / 1 195/361 195/296 195/366 5 / 5 9 19 5 9 3 5 1 2 36 9 1 8 9 195/304195/299 5/ 3 1 1 9 1 195/164 195/362 195/377 1 5 / 195/311 /2 5 195/306 5 195/44 9 195/359 9 1 19 195/307 1 1 5/171 19 95/16 1 5/17 5 9 6 195/60 5 7 / 195/386 195/79 6 2 195/318 195/172 3 7 5 1 195/388 / 4 7 9 5 195/8 5 195/276 5 2 7 /1 9 / 6 1 1 6 5 195/387 / 195/168 9 55 5 3 1 8 2 7 5 / 9 195/167195/373 /1 2 95 1 5 / 19 5 1 195/19 195/372 195/86 9 195/132 1 59 195/374 /2 195/368 1 195/150 5 8 195/135 195/260 4 9 195/148 19 195/369 6 7 5 1 1 / 7 195/158 / / 3 27 195/140 5 5 9 / 1 5 95/261 5 9 9 6 1 9 /1 1 195/323 1 195/64 5 195 19 195/395 195/89 195/48 195/385 195/106 195/108 195/17 195/151 195/95 195/232 195/14 195/97 195/18 195/98

197/204 195/186 195/13 195/189 197/149195/188195/191 195/102 195/187195/13195/192 7 195/194195/202 1 195/201 1 / 195/203 7 197/150 9 195/205195/208 1 197/154 195/209 197/191 195/212195/214 197/103 195/13195/216 INDIAN OCEAN 195/217 197/155197/157 195/218 197/12 197/156197/158 197/160 197/161197/165197/168 197/192 197/162 197/166 197/170 197/114 197/171 197/113 197/61 197/105 197/110 197/78 197/107

LEGEND: PROJECT: PROJEK: Tel: 044 873 4566, Email: [email protected] www.delplan.co.za Proposed subdivision & rezoning for Carmel Evangelical Trust

DESCRIPTION: BESKRYWING:

Kraaibosch 195/276, George

TITLE: TITEL:

Locality plan COPYRIGHT: KOPIEREG: This drawing is the copyright of DELplan Consulting. Do not scale from 1090/GEO/20/GIS/Ligging it but refer to figured dimensions. All measurements must be checked and confirmed by a professional Land Surveyor. Any discrepancies should please be reported to DELplan immediately. DESIGNED: DRAWN: I ONTWERP: SG GETEKEN: MV Die kopiereg van hierdie tekening behoort aan DELplan Consulting. A4 Scale: Moenie daarvan afskaal nie, maar verwys na afstande soos aangedui. Alle afmetings moet deur 'n professionele Landmeter nagegaan en 1:20 000 DATE: PLAN NO: bevestig word. Enige teenstrydighede moet asseblief dadelik aan DATUM: OCT 2020 PLAN NR: ANNEXURE 5 DELplan rapporteer word. COPYRIGHT: KOPIEREG: This drawing is the copyright of DELplan Urban & Regional Planning. Do not scale from it but refer to figured dimensions. All measurements must be checked and confirmed by a Professional Land Surveyor. Any discrepencies

( should please be reported to DELPlan immediately. V

i c

t o

r Die kopiereg van hierdie tekening behoort aan DELplan i a

Stads- & Streekbeplanning. Moenie daarvan afskaalnie, B a FARM 356 maar verwys na afstande soos aangedui. Alle afmetings y

L F FARM 355 moet deur 'n Professionele Landmeter nagegaan en be-

o a

d r vestig word. Enige teenstrydighede moet asseblief dade- m g

e 2 Ptn 80 lik aan DELplan rapporteer word. )

9 8 28.34m 21.92m FARM ZWART RIVIER 194 m PROJECT: 32.17 Proposed subdivision & rezoning Ptn 4 for Carmel EvangelicalPROJEK: Trust

5m street building lines to V Portion A ict DESCRIPTION: or m i 288 a Kraaibosch 195/276, George 7 (±1.0162ha) B BESKRYWING: 8 ad . a Ro 5 y ay 1 m 5 a B 1 ri 0 cto . Vi 4 5 349 1 to George 10m building lines Draft subdivision plan 290 TITLE: TITEL:

Entrance 2 350 3.23m NOTES: NOTAS:

5 1.4 0m Subdivision of Kraaibosch 195/276 into: 292 Ptn 243 Portion A: (±1.0162ha); and 293 Servitude road Wild Wilderness Chalets Remainder of Kraaibosch 195/276 (±45.544ha)

Ptn 360 294 Distance between portions 292 & 350 = 7.41m

295 Subdivision not subject to Act 70/1970 es 4m acces road Stabl 301

296

302 REMAINDER Water tank 351 OF KRAAIBOSCH 195/276 303 (±45.544ha)

298

299 Erven not registered A3 Scale: 1:2000 300 Ptn 179

304

(Sea Glimpse) Tel: 044 873 4566 • Email: [email protected] 312 311 305 310 309 www.delplan.co.za

306

307

308

DESIGNED: DESIGNED: DV

DRAWN: 1090/GEO/20/TEK/SKF/SUB2 GETEKEN: MV SEPTEMBER 2020 DATE: DATUM:

PLAN NO: PLAN NR: ANNEXURE 6 DIRECTORATE: DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT – REGION 3

[email protected]

Tel: +27 44 805 8633 rd 3 Floor Rentzburghof 42 Courtenay Street, George, 6530 www.westerncape.gov.za/eadp

Ref: 15/4/2/3

W van Brakel DELPLAN Consulting PO Box 9956 GEORGE 6530

AGRICULTURAL LAND ACT, 1970 (ACT 70 OF 1970): CONFIRMATION OF THE DESIGNATION OF PORTION 276 OF THE FARM KRAAI BOSCH 195: GEORGE MUNICIPALITY IN TERMS OF THE GEORGE STRUCTURE PLAN

1. The Department has received your request for confirmation of the status and designation of the above- mentioned property in terms of the above Regional Structure Plan, 1982.

2. I hereby confirm that Portion 276 of the Farm Kraai Bosch 195 as indicated on the attached extract was included in the George Structure Plan and designated as “Rural Occupation”.

3. Based on the above information, it is therefore the view of this Department that Portion 276 of the Farm Kraai Bosch 195, George, is exempt from the provisions of the Subdivision of Agricultural Land Act, 1970 (Act 70 of 1970).

4. Should you require any further information, please do not hesitate to contact Elma Vreken from my office on e-mail: [email protected]

Gavin Benjamin

Director: Development Management - Region 3

Date: 25 AUGUST 2020

www.westerncape.gov.za 2

cc. Director: Land Use and Soil Management Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Private Bag X120 PRETORIA 0001

Attention: Ms. Annette Geertsema (e-mail: [email protected]) cc. Director Land Use Management Western Cape: Department of Agriculture Private Bag X1 ELSENBURG 7607

Attention: Mr Cor van der Walt (e-mail: [email protected]) cc. The Surveyor General Western Cape: Department of Rural Development and Land Reform Private Bag X9073 CAPE TOWN 8000 Attention: Mr J Williamson (e-mail: [email protected])

cc. The Surveyor General Western Cape: Department of Rural Development and Land Reform Private Bag X9073 CAPE TOWN 8000

Attention: Mr Andrew Ballantyne (e-mail: [email protected])

GEORGE MUNICIPALITY

APPLICATION FORM FOR APPLICATION SUBMITTED IN TERMS OF THE LAND-USE PLANNING BY-LAW FOR GEORGE MUNICIPALITY

NOTE: Please complete this form using BLOCK capitals and ticking the appropriate boxes. PART A: APPLICANT DETAILS DELAREY First name(s)

VILJOEN Surname

SACPLAN Reg No. A/1021/1998 (if applicable) Company name DELPLAN CONSULTING (if applicable) PO BOX 9956

Postal Address Postal GEORGE 6530 Code

Email [email protected]

Tel Fax 044 873 4568 Cell 082 808 9624 044 873 4566 PART B: REGISTERED OWNER(S) DETAILS (if different from applicant)

Registered owner The Carmel Evangelical Trust

Kraaibosch 195/276 Address Postal

code E-mail

Tel Fax Cell

Page 1 of 6

PART C: PROPERTY DETAILS (in accordance with Title Deeds) Property Description [Erf / Erven / Kraaibosch 195/276 Portion(s) and Farm number(s), allotment area.] Physical Address Kraaibosch 195/276 GPS Coordinates 33°59'50.8"S 22°31'58.8"E Town/City George “Resort Zone II: Holiday housing” in terms of Section 8 Scheme Regulations; “Agricultural Zone I”; Are there existing Current Zoning “Open Space Zone III: Extent 46, 5602ha Y N buildings? Nature conservation area”; “Community Zone II: Place of Worship”.

Current Land Use Holiday accommodation, church and resort Title Deed T012780/2003 number & date Any restrictive If Yes, list conditions Y N condition prohibiting number(s). application? Are the restrictive conditions in If Yes, list the Y N Right-of-way servitudes favour of a third party(ies). party(ies)? Is the property If Yes, list encumbered by Y N Standard Bank Bondholder(s)? a bond? Has the Municipality If yes, list already decided Y N reference on the number(s)? application(s)? Any existing unauthorized buildings and/or land use If yes, is this application to legalize Y N Y N on the subject property(ies)? the building / land use? Are there any land claim(s) Are there any pending court case / order relating to Y N registered on the subject Y N the subject property(ies)? property(ies)? PART D: PRE-APPLICATION CONSULTATION Has there been any pre- If Yes, please complete the information below and attach the Y N application consultation? minutes.

Page 2 of 6

Reference Kraaibosch Date of Official’s name Jeanne Fourie 19 June 2019 number 195/276 consultation

PART E: LAND USE APPLICATIONS IN TERMS OF SECTION 15 OF THE LAND USE PLANNING BY-LAW FOR GEORGE MUNICIPALITY & APPLICATION FEES PAYABLE

*Application fees that are paid to the Municipality are non-refundable and proof of payment of the application fees must accompany the application.

BANKING DETAILS Name: George Municipality Bank: ABSA Branch no.: 632005 Account no.: 01022220981 Type: Cheque Swift Code: ABSAZAJJCPE-SORTCODE 632005 VAT Registration Nr: 4630193664 E-MAIL: [email protected]

*Payment reference: Erf 2164, George

PART F: DETAILS OF PROPOSAL Brief description of proposed development / intent of application: The application for Kraaibosch 195/276, George entails the following:

PART G: ATTACHMENTS & SUPPORTING INFORMATION FOR LAND USE PLANNING APPLICATIONS Please complete the following checklist and attach all the information relevant to the proposal. Failure to submit all information required will result in the application being deemed incomplete. Is the following compulsory information attached? Pre-application Checklist (where Y N Completed application form Y N applicable) Power of Attorney / Owner’s consent if Y N Y N Bondholder’s consent applicant is not owner Y N Motivation report / letter Y N Proof of payment of fees S.G. noting sheet extract / Erf diagram / Y N Full copy of the Title Deed Y N General Plan Y N Locality Plan Y N Site layout plan Minimum and additional requirements: Y N N/A Conveyancer’s Certificate Y N N/A Land Use Plan / Zoning plan

Page 3 of 6

Proposed Subdivision Plan Y N N/A (including street names and Y N N/A Phasing Plan numbers) Copy of original approval letter (if Y N N/A Consolidation Plan Y N N/A applicable) Y N N/A Site Development Plan Y N N/A Landscaping / Tree Plan Home Owners’ Association Y N N/A Abutting owner’s consent Y N N/A consent Copy of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) / Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) / Traffic Impact Assessment (TIA) / 1: 50 / 1:100 Flood line Y N N/A Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) / Y N N/A determination (plan / report) Major Hazard Impact Assessment (MHIA) / Environmental Authorisation (EA) / Record of Decision (ROD) (strikethrough irrelevant) Services Report or indication of Required number of Y N N/A all municipal services / Y N N/A documentation copies 2 copies registered servitudes Any additional documents or information required as listed in Y N N/A Y N N/A Other (specify) the pre-application consultation form / minutes PART H: AUTHORISATION(S) IN TERMS OF OTHER LEGISLATION National Heritage Resources Act, 1999 Specific Environmental Management Y N/A (Act 25 of 1999) Act(s) (SEMA) National Environmental Management (e.g. Environmental Conservation Act, Y N/A Act, 1998 (Act 107 of 1998) 1989 (Act 73 of 1989), National Subdivision of Agricultural Land Act, Environmental Management: Air Quality Y N/A 1970 (Act 70 of 1970) Act, 2004 (Act 39 of 2004), Y N/A National Environmental Integrated Spatial Planning and Land Use Y N/A Management Act, 2013 (Act 16 of Coastal Management Act, 2008 (Act 24

2013) (SPLUMA) of 2008), National Environmental Management: Waste Act, 2008 (Act 59 Occupational Health and Safety Act, of 2008), 1993 (Act 85 of 1993): Major Hazard Y N/A National Water Act, 1998 (Act 36 of 1998) Installations Regulations (strikethrough irrelevant) Land Use Planning Act, 2014 (Act 3 of Y N/A Y N/A Other (specify) 2014) (LUPA) If required, has application for EIA / HIA / TIA / TIS / MHIA approval been made? If yes, attach Y N documents / plans / proof of submission etc. N/A If required, do you want to follow an integrated application procedure in terms of section 44(1) of Y N the Land-Use Planning By-law for George Municipality?

Page 4 of 6

SECTION I: DECLARATION I hereby wish to confirm the following: 1. That the information contained in this application form and accompanying documentation is complete and correct. 2. The Municipality has not already decided on the application. 3. I’m aware that it is an offense in terms of section 86(1)(d) to supply particulars, information or answers in an application, knowing it to be false, incorrect or misleading or not believing them to be correct. 4. I am properly authorized to make this application on behalf of the owner and (where applicable) copies of such full relevant Powers of Attorney/Consent are attached hereto. 5. I have been appointed to submit this application on behalf of the owner and it is accepted that correspondence from and notifications by the Municipality in terms of the by-law will be sent only to me as the authorised agent and the owner will regularly consult with the agent in this regard (where applicable). 6. That this submission includes all necessary land use planning applications required to enable the development proposed herein. 7. I confirm that the relevant title deed(s) have been read and that there are no restrictive title deed restrictions, which impact on this application, or alternatively an application for removal/amendment/suspension forms part of this submission. 8. I am aware of the status of the existing bulk services and infrastructure in the subject area and that I am liable for any possible development charges which may be payable as a result of the proposed development.

Applicant’s signature: Date: 29 October 2020

Full name: DELAREY VILJOEN

PROFESSIONAL PLANNER Professional capacity:

A/1021/1998 SACPLAN Reg. Nr:

FOR OFFICE USE ONLY

Date received: Received by:

Receipt number:

Date application complete

ANNEXURES Annexure A: Exemplar of locality plan (consult Please do not submit these Annexure exemplars with guidelines for precise requirements) the application form. Annexure B: Application submission checklist Annexure C: Exemplar of typical layout plan (consult guidelines for precise requirements

Page 5 of 6

Annexure D: Examples of required documents

Page 6 of 6