Little Salmon River Subbasin Assessment and TMDL

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Little Salmon River Subbasin Assessment and TMDL Little Salmon River Subbasin Assessment and TMDL Department of Environmental Quality February 2006 Little Salmon River Subbasin Assessment and TMDL February 2006 This space intentionally left blank for correct double-sided printing. ii Little Salmon River Subbasin Assessment and TMDL February 2006 Little Salmon River TMDL February 2006 Prepared by: Boise Regional Office Department of Environmental Quality 1445 N. Orchard St. Boise ID 83706 iii Little Salmon River Subbasin Assessment and TMDL February 2006 This space intentionally left blank for correct double-sided printing. iv Little Salmon River Subbasin Assessment and TMDL February 2006 Table of Contents Table of Contents ................................................................................................................................. v List of Tables........................................................................................................................................ix List of Figures......................................................................................................................................xi Abbreviations, Acronyms, and Symbols ........................................................................................xiii Executive Summary .........................................................................................................................xvii Subbasin at a Glance......................................................................................................................xvii Key Findings..................................................................................................................................... xx TMDLs.............................................................................................................................................. xx Public Participation..........................................................................................................................xxii 1. Subbasin Assessment – Watershed Characterization .................................................................1 1.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................1 Background....................................................................................................................................1 Idaho’s Role ...................................................................................................................................2 1.2 Physical and Biological Characteristics .......................................................................................3 Climate...........................................................................................................................................5 Geology..........................................................................................................................................7 Fisheries.......................................................................................................................................14 Subwatershed Characteristics .....................................................................................................21 Stream Characteristics.................................................................................................................24 1.3 Cultural Characteristics..............................................................................................................27 Land Ownership, Cultural Features, and Population...................................................................27 Land Use......................................................................................................................................31 History..........................................................................................................................................33 Economics ...................................................................................................................................34 Recreation....................................................................................................................................35 2. Subbasin Assessment – Water Quality Concerns and Status...................................................37 2.1 Water Quality Limited Assessment Units Occurring in the Subbasin ........................................39 About Assessment Units..............................................................................................................39 Listed Waters ...............................................................................................................................40 2.2 Applicable Water Quality Standards ..........................................................................................40 Beneficial Uses ............................................................................................................................41 Criteria to Support Beneficial Uses..............................................................................................43 2.3 Pollutant/Beneficial Use Support Status Relationships .............................................................46 Temperature ................................................................................................................................46 Dissolved Oxygen ........................................................................................................................46 Sediment......................................................................................................................................47 Bacteria........................................................................................................................................48 Nutrients.......................................................................................................................................49 Sediment – Nutrient Relationship ................................................................................................50 Floating, Suspended, or Submerged Matter (Nuisance Algae)...................................................50 2.4 Summary and Analysis of Existing Water Quality Data ............................................................51 Data Assessment Methods..........................................................................................................51 v Little Salmon River Subbasin Assessment and TMDL February 2006 StreamStat................................................................................................................................... 54 Little Salmon River ...................................................................................................................... 55 Mud Creek ................................................................................................................................... 67 Big Creek..................................................................................................................................... 73 Goose Creek ............................................................................................................................... 80 Brundage Reservoir..................................................................................................................... 87 Geology ....................................................................................................................................... 87 Six Mile Creek/ Four Mile Creek/ Three Mile Creek.................................................................... 88 Round Valley Creek..................................................................................................................... 94 Hazard Creek .............................................................................................................................. 97 Boulder Creek............................................................................................................................ 105 Elk Creek ................................................................................................................................... 113 Indian Creek .............................................................................................................................. 119 First and Second Order Tributaries to the Little Salmon River below Round Valley Creek...... 123 Sheep Creek.............................................................................................................................. 125 Hat Creek .................................................................................................................................. 126 Denny Creek.............................................................................................................................. 128 Lockwood Creek........................................................................................................................ 129 Rattlesnake Creek..................................................................................................................... 130 Fall Creek .................................................................................................................................. 132 Rapid River................................................................................................................................ 133 Shingle Creek...........................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Ruby Tanner Calendar Editor Emeritus
    The IDAHO magazine July 2017 issue is dedicated to Ruby Tanner Calendar Editor Emeritus A treasured friend and our long-time calendar editor, Ruby Tanner, had a devastating stroke on September 13, 2017. She fought against all odds, but succumbed on September 22. Ruby, the honorary sister of our publisher, Kitty Fleischman, will be missed especially for her sweetness and kindness. Our deepest sympathies go to her husband of more than sixty years, Les Tanner, and their children, Michelle (Miki) Tanner-Bendickson, and Michael Tanner. Ruby loved farmers’ markets, rodeos, Roy Rogers, and she was crazy about Lance Pekus, Idaho’s “Ninja Cowboy.” She toured many an antique store with Kitty. She loved eating lunches out, and had a kind word for everyone she met. Aptly named, Ruby was a jewel in every sense. Contact us to learn how you can sponsor an issue of IDAHO magazine. Call (208) 336-0653 or (800) 655-0653, or email: [email protected] JULY 2017 | VOL. 16, NO. 10 Cowboy Ninja The TV Star from Salmon July Big Creek Across the Devils Frigid Embrace Spotlight City On Tote Goats in 1973 Welcome to Stanley US $3.95 www.IDAHOmagazine.com What’s the cost of living in Idaho? Pretty darn reasonable, when you live through the pages of IDAHO magazine. Improve your quality of life. Subscribe now. SHIP TO: 1-year $34.95 + 6% ID sales tax = $37.05 Get one FREE! Buy 5 Subscriptions 2-year $59.95 + 6% ID sales tax = $63.55 Name _______________________________________________________________________________________ Address _____________________________________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Structure of the Arc—Continent Transition
    STRUCTURE OF THE ARC—CONTINENT TRANSITION IN THE RIGGINS REGION OF WEST-CENTRAL IDAHO By KEITH D. GRAY A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY Department of Geology December 2012 To the faculty of Washington State University: Members of the Committee appointed to examine the dissertation of KEITH D. GRAY find it satisfactory and recommend that it be accepted. ________________________________________________ A. John Watkinson, Ph.D. [Chair] ________________________________________________ Jeffrey D. Vervoort, Ph.D. ________________________________________________ Reed S. Lewis, Ph.D. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author acknowledges Drs. A.J. Watkinson, R.S. Lewis, and J.D. Vervoort (committee members) for overseeing this project. Thank you for encouragement and patience throughout. Early research was funded by Dr. J.S. Oldow (UI, UTD), the Belt Association, and Tobacco Root Geological Society. C. Scott and E. O’Fallon are thanked for office support. The work of zircon gurus V. Isakson and D. (‘SHG’) Schwartz is deeply appreciated. Thanks to A. Jansen for laboratory assistance, and Dr. K. Wilke and K. Felt for help w/ the 11th floor plotter. Dr. D. Blake (UNCW) is thanked for time and travels related to preliminary exams. Thanks to Dr. T.L. Vallier for visiting Pullman on his 76th birthday; also, for the maul provided in June 1997. The Spencer’s are recognized for their early +’ve influence. 1000 thanks to KG’s family for years of understanding. A special acknowledgement is also extended to my fiancé K. Palmeira for making everything possible. Finally, the author wishes to acknowledge former geoscientists of the SRSZ: To all who have come before, yet left some ground untrammeled.
    [Show full text]
  • Study Area Summary
    Wallowa-Whitman National Forest Wild and Scenic River Inventory Documentation Last Updated 03/25/2010 BIG SHEEP CREEK A suitability study was conducted on Big Sheep Creek in the Wild and Scenic River Study report and final legislative environmental impact statement for eight rivers administered by the Wallowa-Whitman National forest. In that study, Big Sheep Creek was not found suitable as a Wild and Scenic river. Given this finding of unsuitability, this stream is no longer considered eligible, regardless of the presence of outstanding remarkable values. Location: This study focuses on the potential eligibility and classification of Big Sheep Creek from its headwaters to the Imnaha Wild and Scenic River Boundary (near the confluence of Big Sheep Creek and the Imnaha River, Section 20, T. 1 N., R. 48 E., W.M.). The current boundary of the Imnaha Wild and Scenic River incorporates 1/8th of a mile of Big Sheep Creek. River Mileage: Studied: 49.1 Eligible: 49.1 Eligibility Determination of Free-flow: The study segment contains two small, 3- to 5-foot diversion dams which are used seasonally to divert water for irrigation and power generation (see Fisheries and Water Development sections). Despite these low dams or diversion works, the river is found to be free-flowing. SCENERY Determination of Outstandingly Remarkable Values: Big Sheep Creek begins above 8,000 feet on the eastern edge of the Eagle Cap Wilderness in the Wallowa Mountains and flows for 40 miles to the Imnaha River. The upper portion is composed of the North, Middle, and South Forks, which are respectively, 2, 4, and 3 miles in length.
    [Show full text]
  • Alpine and Subalpine Vegetation of the Wallowa, Seven Devils, and Blue Mountains
    United States Department of Agriculture Alpine and Subalpine Forest of the Service Vegetation Pacific Wallowa, Seven Devils and Northwest Region Blue Mountains By Charles Grier Johnson Jr. Alpine and Subalpine Vegetation of the Wallowa, Seven Devils, and Blue Mountains Charles G. Johnson, Jr. PHOTOS: Front Cover: Glacier Lake and Cusick Mountain in the Wallowa Mountains. Title Page: Grazing mountain goats on the summit of Cusick Mountain, Wallowa Mountains. Back Cover: Subalpine fir nursed by a whitebark pine snag. The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, and marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s 2004 TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of USDA - Forest Service discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC Pacific Northwest Region 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice or TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. R6-NR-ECOL-TP-03-04 To My Packers Field Assistants Access to remote subalpine portions of the mountains often required special assistance from packers for the equipment, gear, and supplies Over the years there have been many who have assisted me with necessary for 8 to 10-day hitches. Although the majority of the plots were access into remote subalpine portions of the mountains enabling me to established far and high above base camps, these experienced packers conduct field studies.
    [Show full text]