Criticism in News and Its Effects on Authoritarian Duration in China By
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Criticism in News and Its Effects on Authoritarian Duration in China By Dan Chen Submitted to the graduate degree program in Political Science and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. _______________________________ Chairperson John Kennedy _______________________________ Mark Joslyn _______________________________ Robert Rohrschneider _______________________________ Jiso Yoon _______________________________ Scott Reinardy Date Defended: April 14, 2014 The Dissertation Committee for Dan Chen certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Criticism in News and Its Effects on Authoritarian Duration in China ______________________________ Chairperson John Kennedy Date approved: April 22, 2014 ii Abstract This study explains the varying levels of criticism in news coverage in China and tests the news effects on public opinion. It proposes a revision to the traditional censorship paradigm—fractured censorship system. It finds that in authoritarian China, censorship on the news media is not monolithic. Nor is it entirely decided by ideology. In fact, censorship is a locus where negotiations among political and business powers occur. Specifically, the potentially diverging interests between the central and local governments, the strong commercial interests of news organizations, and the aspirations of certain journalists may constitute fractures in the censorship system that allow sporadic criticism on local governments and officials. Fractured censorship does not mean fault lines. The fundamental characteristic of China’s censorship system remains to be its swift and effective intervention over news content. While fractured censorship helps us understand the news production process, once critical news is published or broadcasted, how does such news affect public opinion, if at all? What are the implications of such fractured censorship for authoritarian duration in China? Through two field experiments conducted in east and central China, this study finds that critical news does not necessarily undermine public evaluation of the regime. In fact, critical news may blow off the steam of public anger over contentious social and political issues that emerged during China’s economic and political development process, which helps consolidate, rather than undermine, the authoritarian rule. iii Table of Contents Abstract List of Figures List of Tables Introduction Chapter 1 The News Media as a Political Actor in Authoritarian China…………………………1 Part I News Production: Fractured Censorship Chapter 2 Political Fracture: Monitoring Local Officials, Establishing Personal Authority…….28 Chapter 3 Market Fracture: Market Competition Among News Organizations…………………51 Chapter 4 Journalistic Fracture: Aspirational News Professionals………………………………89 Part II News Effects: Limited Influence on Public Opinion Chapter 5 Limited Effects of Critical News on Public Opinion………………………………..116 Conclusion Chapter 6 State-Controlled Media and Authoritarian Duration…………………………….…..148 Appendix: Sources and Research Methods……………………………………………………..163 Bibliography……………………………………………………………………………………168 iv List of Figures Figure 3.1……………………………………………………………………...…………………55 Figure 3.2……………………………………………………………………...…………………56 Figure 3.3…………………………………………………………………………...……………58 Figure 3.4……………………………………………………………………………...…………59 Figure 3.5……………………………………………………………………………...…………60 Figure 3.6……………………………………………………………………………...…………71 Figure 3.7………………………………………………………………………………...………73 Figure 5.1……………………………………………………………………………….………130 Figure 5.2……………………………………………………………………………….………131 Figure 5.3……………………………………………………………………………….………137 Figure 5.4………………………………………………………………………………….……138 Figure 6.1……………………………………………………………………………………….149 Figure 6.2……………………………………………………………………………………….155 Figure 7.1……………………………………………………………………………………….164 v List of Tables Table 4.1………………………………………………………………………………………110 Table 4.2………………………………………………………………………………………112 Table 4.3………………………………………………………………………………………113 Table 4.4………………………………………………………………………………………114 Table 5.1………………………………………………………………………………………128 Table 5.2………………………………………………………………………………………129 Table 5.3………………………………………………………………………………………134 Table 5.4………………………………………………………………………………………136 Table 5.5………………………………………………………………………………………139 Table 5.6………………………………………………………………………………………139 Table 5.7………………………………………………………………………………………140 Table 5.8………………………………………………………………………………………140 Table 5.9………………………………………………………………………………………141 vi Chapter 1 The News Media as a Political Actor in Authoritarian China Control over the news media characterizes Chinese authoritarianism. An important manifestation of such control is the lack of criticism on the regime, including governments and officials at central and local levels. After the economic reform initiated in the late 1970s, the Chinese media experienced marketization that consists of deregulation, commercialization, and partial privatization (Stockmann 2013). As a result, the media market, that is, audience and readers, has become an important factor in the news production process. The receded state control does not mean, however, that the state is losing control. The media now have to satisfy both the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the market. The two forces often pull media content in different directions, creating a dilemma for media practitioners (Brady 2008; Stockmann 2013; Zhao 1998, 2008). Consequently, Chinese media remain tightly controlled by the CCP. The increased but still limited reporting freedom in the news media actually contributes to, rather than undermines, the authoritarian rule in China (Stockmann 2013). While this study comes to a similar conclusion that the news media in China helps consolidate the authoritarian rule, it challenges both the perception of the lack of political criticism in authoritarian China and the understanding that political and market forces drive news content in different directions. Focusing on varying levels of criticism in news, this study finds that the diverging interests of the central and local governments, the commercial interests of news organizations, and journalistic aspirations constitute fractures in the censorship system that allow sporadic political criticism at local levels. The diverging political interests of central and local governments can sometimes drive news in a critical direction, consistent with the direction 1 of market competition. However, such criticism tends to stay at the local level, and the censorship system remains effective. This study also finds that such critical news has limited effects on public opinion. Specifically, while it can lead the public to be more dissatisfied with local governments on contentious issues, it does not undermine the public’s confidence in the government’s capability to ultimately solve difficult social issues. In other words, it blows off the steam of public anger without compromising the overall legitimacy of the CCP. Therefore, the fractured censorship system contributes to, rather than undermine, the authoritarian rule in China. Next, this chapter reviews the literature of authoritarian politics and the media, introduces the research questions, discusses the mixed-methods approach used in this study, and concludes with an overview of the remaining chapters. *** News media has long been entangled with authoritarian politics (e.g. Farrell 2012; Garnham 2000; Lee 1990; Lerner and Schramm 1967; Pye 1963; Randall 1998; Skidmore 1993). In many authoritarian regimes, the opening of the economic system, that is, increasing market competition and receding state control, is not accompanied by the loosening of media control, at least not to the same extent. In Vietnam, despite the promotion of an open economy, surveillance and imprisonment of critical journalists prevail (CPJ 2012). In Russia, reports critical of the regime can lead to assassinations of journalists (The Economist 2006; 2009). In China, the situation of press freedom is among the worst in the world.1 The recent incident of censors modifying an editorial that a liberal newspaper Southern Weekend prepared to publish resulted in public gatherings in support of media freedom in January of 2013. The lack of press freedom is 1 Reporters Without Borders ranks China at 174 out of 179 countries and regions in the world in the Press Freedom Index 2011-2012. 2 seen as a defining characteristic of authoritarian regimes and thus has been broadly reported by foreign media especially from democracies. In most authoritarian regimes media are state- controlled. In the journalistic discourse, the state-controlled media may help propagate news and commentary praising the regime; minimize the spread of news and commentary critical of the regime; and sometimes help mobilize the public for political campaigns launched by the regime. While journalists seem to have reached converging views that perceive the state-controlled media as tools of authoritarian regimes, scholars have probed this topic through the lens of authoritarian politics and have reached different, if not opposite, understandings. What is the political role of the news media in the functioning of authoritarian regimes? After the end of the Cold War, the political role of the media in authoritarian societies has attracted much scholarly attention (e.g. Chan and Lee 1991; Price et al. 2002). Within the discipline of political science, democratization scholars have pointed out that access to alternative information may be an essential enabling