Health IT Vendors in CPC+

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Health IT Vendors in CPC+ Health IT Vendors in CPC+ Comprehensive Primary Care Plus (CPC+) is a national advanced primary care medical home model that aims to strengthen primary care through regionally based multipayer payment reform and care delivery transformation. CPC+ practices are required to meet specific health IT requirements that differ by track. In order to support Track 2 practices, health IT vendors must provide the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) with Letter(s) of Support [LOS(s)] and sign a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU). Vendors may submit an individual LOS for each Track 2 practice they are supporting, or a Global LOS if they are supporting multiple practices. Three tables below provide information on health IT vendors who have signed MOUs to support Track 2 CPC+ practices; on other health IT vendors participating in CPC+; and on those interested in participating. • Table 1 lists health IT vendors that have provided CMS with a Global LOS and signed an MOU as part of supporting Track 2 practices. The “Vendors with Signed MOU” column contains links to vendor websites, while the “Global LOS” column includes links to their letters. Practices seeking a vendor to support their participation in CPC+, especially Track 2, may be interested in reviewing this list for potential partners. • Table 2 names other health IT vendors that currently support Track 1 CPC+ practices. Vendors in this table may offer one or more of the health IT functions required for CPC+, however they have not signed an MOU to support Track 2 practices. • Table 3 includes health IT vendors that have expressed interest in supporting CPC+ practices, but are not doing so currently. Please note that this document includes vendors who voluntarily submitted contact information to CMS. CMS does not endorse any vendor included in these tables, nor does inclusion in this document confirm that a specific vendor’s products will meet the CPC+ health IT requirements. Practices should reach out to vendors directly to learn more about their product. Last updated: January 23, 2018. Comprehensive Primary Care Plus Center for Medicare & Medicaid Innovation Table 1. Health IT Vendors with MOUs Vendors with Signed MOU Global LOS Advanced Data Systems Corporation Blank Allscripts Healthcare Blank Amazing Charts Yes Applied Research Works, Inc. Yes Aprima Yes athenahealth, Inc. Blank Bizmatics, Inc. Blank Caravan Health Yes CareTracker, Inc. Blank Cerner Corporation Yes ChartLogic a division of Medshphere Systems Corporation Yes DigiDMS Yes DOC-TOR.COM Blank EagleDream Health Yes eClinicalWorks, LLC Yes eInformatics Blank Elation Health Yes eMDs Yes Enli Health Intelligence Yes Epic Blank Evolent Health, LLC Yes FIGmd, Inc. Yes Garage Solutions, LLC Blank GE Healthcare IT Yes Glenwood Systems, LLC Yes Greenway Health, LLC Yes Health Collaborative Yes Health Endeavors Yes Health eFilings, LLC Yes HealthFusion, Inc. Yes Henry Schein Medical Systems-MicroMD Yes i2i Systems, Inc. Blank IBM Watson Health Blank iPatientCare, Inc. Yes Lightbeam Health Yes Lumeris Solutions Company, LLC Blank MDLand Blank MEDENT Yes Medfusion Blank Page 2 of 8 Vendors with Signed MOU Global LOS MedInformatix Blank Medical Information Technology, Inc. (MEDITECH) Blank Meditab Software, Inc. Yes Microwize Technology, Inc. Yes Mingle Analytics, LLC Yes MyHealth Access Network, Inc. Yes NextGen Healthcare Yes Ohio Health Information Partnership Yes Optum Blank PatientPing, Inc. Blank PDSMED Blank Persivia Inc. Yes Phillips Wellcentive Yes Phyzit, Inc. Blank Practice Fusion, Inc. Yes Provider’s Management, Inc. Blank Quest Diagnostics Blank Qvera Blank Saturn Care, Inc. Yes SOAPware, Inc. Blank STI Computer Services, Inc. Blank UnisLink Blank Verinovum Yes Page 3 of 8 Table 2. Other Health IT Vendors Supporting CPC+ Track 1 Practices Vendor Name Acmeware, Inc. AdvancedMD Aledade Appriss Benchmark Systems Chart Perfect ChartSpan Medical Technologies, Inc. Chronic Care Management, LLC Claimpower, Inc. CoverMyMeds Custom Computing Corporation DHI Computing Digital Medical Solutions, Inc. EHRMedbilling Enable Healthcare, Inc. Genius Solutions, Inc. HCA Physician Services Healthbridge Healthcare Collaborative of Great Columbus iMed Software Corporation Indian Health Service Information Softworks, Inc. InSync HealthCare Solutions Intelichart, LLC Intelligent Medical Objects Intergy Lexicomp Loxogon MacPractice, Inc. MDS Medical Medplus ModuleMD MTBC (A Unique Healthcare IT Company) ODH Impact SIIS Onetouch PBO Corporation Phreesia, Inc. PonoHealth Praxis Page 4 of 8 Vendor Name Resource and Patient Management System (RPMS) SAP Business Objects Sevocity, a division of Conceptual MindWorks, Inc. Simbiote Sunquest Information Systems, Inc. Surescripts, LLC UpToDate Willamette Valley Physician Health Authority Page 5 of 8 Table 3. Health IT Vendors Interested in Supporting CPC+ Practices Vendor Name 10CPCplustools.com (dba CMS Gateways, LLC) 4Med Mobile 5o9, Inc (dba 3PHealth) Accordion Health, Inc. Accountable Care Transactions (ACT.md) Acupera Alliance Nursing Advisors AlternaVisit, LLC Arcadia Healthcare Solutions Aver, Inc. Blum Telehealth CareCloud Corporation Care Technology Solutions CareSync CareVitality, Inc., a subsidiary of EHR & Practice Management Consultants, Inc. Citra Health Solutions Citrix CivicHealth, Inc. Clinically Speaking Clinigence, LLC CloudMedx, Inc. Cobalt Talon, LLC CompuGroup Medical CrossTx CureMD HealthCare Data Minded Solutions eQHealth Solutions Equate Health eTransX, Inc. Forward Health Group Galen Healthcare Solutions Geneia, LLC Hal Cal Hale Health HC360 Technologies Health EC Health Leads Healthify, Inc. Healthmonix Page 6 of 8 Vendor Name HealthViewX IDology Infina Connect Healthcare Systems Innovaccer, Inc. InXite Health Systems Livongo Health M3 Information, LLC Markit Medical Massachusetts eHealth Collaborative – Quality Data Center MD Revolution MedAssets-Precyse Medical Marketing Solutions (MMS) Medisolv Medocity Milliman PRM Analytics Mingle Analytics My Virtual Doctor nThrive OCHIN Oculus Health, Inc. Patienttoc PAYODA Pieran Health Technologies Prevail Health Solutions PRIME Registry Reporting MD Rimage Solutions RISARC Consulting, LLC RoundingWell, Inc. SPH Analytics SpectraMedix Stratagem Health, Inc. Suncoast RHIO Sutherland Healthcare Solutions TapCloud, LLC TechSoft, Inc. Telelytics ThoughtSwift Medical Screening Treatspace Vatica Health Page 7 of 8 Vendor Name Vermedx, Inc., d/b/a Patient Engagement Systems Vivfy Health, Inc. VTConnect ZirMed, Inc. Page 8 of 8 .
Recommended publications
  • A Cloud Based Patient-Centered Ehealth Record
    International Journal on Advances in Life Sciences, vol 7 no 1 & 2, year 2015, http://www.iariajournals.org/life_sciences/ 30 A Cloud Based Patient-Centered eHealth Record Konstantinos Koumaditis, Leonidas Katelaris, and Marinos Themistocleous Department of Digital Systems University of Piraeus Piraeus, Greece e-mail: (konkoum,lkatelaris,mthemist)@unipi.gr Abstract - This research focuses on the Patient-Centered integrated view of citizens health status. The latter is reflected e-Health (PCEH) concept by introducing its importance in EHRs and Personal Health Records (PHRs), which are and demonstrating a multidisciplinary project that being enriched and exploited by different actors and combines advanced technologies. The project links stakeholders (i.e., health and care professionals, citizens, several aspects of PCEH functionality, such as: (a) nutrition experts, hospitals, etc.) in the health ecosystem. homecare telemedicine technologies, (b) e-prescribing, e- Three general PHR models have been proposed [7]: a) the referral, e-learning and (c) state-of-the-art technologies stand-alone model, b) Electronic Health Record (EHR) like cloud computing and Service Oriented Architecture system, and c) the integrated one, which is an interoperable (SOA), will lead to an innovative integrated e-health system providing linkage with a variety of patient platform that delivers many benefits to the society, the information sources, such as EHRs, home diagnostics, economy, the industry and the research community. This insurance claims etc. The main types of health information paper provides insights of the PCEH concept and the supported by PHRs are problem lists, procedures, major current stages of the project. In doing so, we aim to illnesses, provider lists, allergy data, home-monitored data, increase the awareness of this significant work and family history, social history and lifestyle, immunizations, disseminate the knowledge gained so far through our medications and laboratory tests [8, 9].
    [Show full text]
  • Software & Services
    SOFTWARE & SERVICES Recognizing the software and service organizations that excelled in helping providers deliver better patient care PHYSICIAN PRACTICE SOLUTIONS BEST IN KLAS AMBULATORY EMR (1–10 PHYSICIANS) HOW DO VENDOR SOLUTIONS COMPARE? WHO IS KONFIDENCE SCORE TREND LEVEL 1. Cerner PowerChart Ambulatory BEST IN KLAS? 84.3 +13% üü 2. Amazing Charts 83.3 +4% üüü 3. SRSsoft EHR 81.0 -11% üü 4. athenahealth athenaClinicals 80.9 -7% üüü 5. Greenway PrimeSUITE Chart 79.1 -2% üüü HOW DO THEY SCORE? 6. Aprima EHR IN FIVE KEY PERFORMANCE CATEGORIES 78.2 -1% üüü 100 92.4 7. ADP AdvancedMD EHR +3% üüü 90 84.9 78.0 80.6 81.7 81.2 80 8. e-MDs Chart -13% üüü 70 74.0 60 AVG. SEGMENT MKT. 9. GE Healthcare Centricity Practice Solution EMR +1% üü PHYSICIAN PRACTICE PHYSICIAN 50 73.8 40 T10. eClinicalWorks EHR 73.4 -7% üüü 30 20 T10. Henry Schein MicroMD EMR 73.4 +4% üü 10 12. NextGen Healthcare EHR 0 65.1 -3% üüü SALES & FUNCTIONALITY GENERAL CONTRACTING & UPGRADES 13. Allscripts Professional EHR 64.7 -6% üüü SERVICE & IMPLEMENTATION SUPPORT 14. McKesson Practice Partner -14% & TRAINING 48.0 üü 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 SEE HOW OTHER VENDOR SOLUTIONS SCORE AT KLASRESEARCH.COM HOW DO THE TOP THREE SOLUTIONS TREND? SOLUTIONS NOT RANKED PRELIMINARY DATA PRODUCTS CompuGroup Medical Enterprise EHR (HEHR)*..................71.0 MIE WebChart EMR* ............................................................75.7 MTBC EMR* .........................................................................82.1 Optum Physician EMR* ........................................................79.6
    [Show full text]
  • Fidelity® Total Market Index Fund
    Quarterly Holdings Report for Fidelity® Total Market Index Fund May 31, 2021 STI-QTLY-0721 1.816022.116 Schedule of Investments May 31, 2021 (Unaudited) Showing Percentage of Net Assets Common Stocks – 99.3% Shares Value Shares Value COMMUNICATION SERVICES – 10.1% World Wrestling Entertainment, Inc. Class A (b) 76,178 $ 4,253,780 Diversified Telecommunication Services – 1.1% Zynga, Inc. (a) 1,573,367 17,055,298 Alaska Communication Systems Group, Inc. 95,774 $ 317,970 1,211,987,366 Anterix, Inc. (a) (b) 16,962 838,941 Interactive Media & Services – 5.6% AT&T, Inc. 11,060,871 325,521,434 Alphabet, Inc.: ATN International, Inc. 17,036 805,292 Class A (a) 466,301 1,099,001,512 Bandwidth, Inc. (a) (b) 34,033 4,025,764 Class C (a) 446,972 1,077,899,796 Cincinnati Bell, Inc. (a) 84,225 1,297,065 ANGI Homeservices, Inc. Class A (a) 120,975 1,715,426 Cogent Communications Group, Inc. (b) 66,520 5,028,912 Autoweb, Inc. (a) (b) 6,653 19,028 Consolidated Communications Holdings, Inc. (a) 110,609 1,035,300 Bumble, Inc. 77,109 3,679,641 Globalstar, Inc. (a) (b) 1,067,098 1,707,357 CarGurus, Inc. Class A (a) 136,717 3,858,154 IDT Corp. Class B (a) (b) 31,682 914,343 Cars.com, Inc. (a) 110,752 1,618,087 Iridium Communications, Inc. (a) 186,035 7,108,397 DHI Group, Inc. (a) (b) 99,689 319,005 Liberty Global PLC: Eventbrite, Inc. (a) 114,588 2,326,136 Class A (a) 196,087 5,355,136 EverQuote, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Healthcare It Industry Update │ Q3 2016
    HEALTHCARE IT INDUSTRY UPDATE │ Q3 2016 www.harriswilliams.com Investment banking services are provided by Harris Williams LLC, a registered broker-dealer and member of FINRA and SIPC, and Harris Williams & Co. Ltd, which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Harris Williams & Co. is a trade name under which Harris Williams LLC and Harris Williams & Co. Ltd conduct business. 0 HEALTHCARE IT INDUSTRY UPDATE | Q3 2016 HEALTHCARE IT PRACTICE OVERVIEW CONTENTS INTRODUCTION . WHAT WE’RE READING Harris Williams & Co. is pleased to present our review of Q3 Healthcare IT . KEY HEALTHCARE MACRO activity. This report provides commentary and analysis on current capital market INDICATORS trends and merger and acquisition dynamics within the Healthcare IT industry. PUBLIC MARKETS . PUBLIC COMPARABLES We hope you find this edition helpful and encourage you to contact us directly if . M&A ACTIVITY you would like to discuss our perspective on current industry trends and M&A . PRIVATE PLACEMENT ACTIVITY opportunities or our relevant industry experience. IPO ACTIVITY OUR PRACTICE CONTACTS Sam Hendler Harris Williams & Co. is a leading advisor to the Healthcare IT industry. Our global Managing Director practice includes professionals across the firm from Harris Williams & Co.’s [email protected] Technology, Media & Telecom Group and Healthcare & Life Sciences Group. +1 (617) 654-2117 Jeff Bistrong HW&Co. Healthcare IT Taxonomy Managing Director [email protected] +1 (617) 654-2102 . Patient-Facing Solutions Mike Wilkins . Care Delivery: Managing Director Operational Efficiency [email protected] +1 (415) 271-3411 . Care Delivery: Clinical / Acute Thierry Monjauze Managing Director . Care Delivery: [email protected] Clinical / Non-Acute +44 20 7518 8901 CARE DELIVERY EMPLOYERS ORGANIZATIONS PATIENTS .
    [Show full text]
  • This Is the 19Th Annual Sohn Investment Conference. the First
    This is the 19th Annual Sohn Investment Conference. The first time Ispoke here was in 2002. It is amazing how this great event has grown, and I am honored to be here. 1 2 A couple weeks ago, we wrote in our quarterly letter that we believe that a narrow group of cool kid stocks have disconnected from traditional valuations and formed a bubble. This got a lot of criticism. Half the critics thought we were talking our book, even though we didn’t name names. The other half were upset that we didn’t tell them which stocks we were short. Since we can’t seem to please anybody, I’ve decided to validate both criticisms. Today, I’m going to illustrate the bubble basket doing a deep dive into one of the companies, while not disclosing the others. This company is an excellent company with an excellent product, run by a well‐meaning and honest, though occasionally promotional CEO. The world may be a better place if it succeeds, and even though we are short, I am in no way rooting for it to fail. Its main problem is that it isn’t positioned to succeed the way the bulls hope, as the assumptions the bulls are making are not plausible. The stock is simply at the wrong price. It’s caught up in a bubble and could easily fall 80% or more from its recent peak. Let me introduce you to athenahealth. 3 I think athena deserves a smaller capitalization, and I’m not just referring to how it fails to capitalize the first letter of its name.
    [Show full text]
  • PROPERTY RIGHTS and ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS by Jessica Carges
    No. 17-37 Summer 2017 MERCATUS GRADUATE POLICY ESSAY PROPERTY RIGHTS AND ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS by Jessica Carges The opinions expressed in this Graduate Policy Essay are the author’s and do not represent official positions of the Mercatus Center or George Mason University. Abstract This is an analysis of the current assignment of property rights of electronic health records and patient medical data. The paper focuses on the adverse incentives created by the current structure of property rights and hypothesizes that giving patients and provers co-ownership of medical data will best address concerns about interoperability and privacy, and also result in a number of additional positive benefits. Next the paper describes ways to make stronger patient ownership a reality despite the presence of special interest groups incentivized to block access. The paper concludes with state policy level analysis examining New Hampshire – the only state to currently grant patient ownership over medical data and electronic health record. this paper finds that state governments can follow New Hampshire’s lead and extend co-property rights to patients and providers to improve interoperability and privacy outcomes. Author Bio Jessica Carges is a research associate with the State Fiscal Health Team at The Pew Charitable Trusts. She received an MA in economics from George Mason University, and is an alumna of the Mercatus MA Fellowship program. Jessica holds a BS in economics, also from George Mason University. Committee Members Bobbi Herzberg, Distinguished Senior Fellow, F.A. Hayek Program for Advanced Study in Philosophy, Politics, and Economics. Nicole Fisher, President, HHR Strategies, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Top 20 Ehr Software
    TOP 20 EHR SOFTWARE C M CONVERTED MEDIA TOP 20 EHR SOFTWARE 1 AdvancedMD AdvancedEHR 11 Allscripts Allscripts Professional EHR 2 Cerner Cerner Ambulatory EHR 12 CareCloud CareCloud Charts 3 athenahealth athenahealth EHR 13 CureMD All in One EHR 4 Epic Epic EHR 14 Practice Velocity VelociDoc EHR Azalea Health 5 Practice Fusion Practice Fusion EHR 15 Azalea EHR Innovations 6 Kareo Kareo Clinical 16 ReLi Med Solutions ReLiMed EMR 7 Henry Schein MicroMD EMR 17 MedEZ MedEZ 8 drchrono drchrono EHR 18 iSALUS Healthcare OfficeEMR 9 NextGen Healthcare NextGen Healthcare EHR 19 ChartLogic ChartLogic EMR Modernizing 10 EMA 20 ICANotes ICANotes EHR Medicine C M CONVERTED MEDIA EHR IN PRACTICE HOW THESE RANKINGS WERE GENERATED This ranking was determined using a number of factors including industry standing, public opinion of software, social media presence, and available software features relevant to the needs of a small business. This ranking should serve as a rough estimate of software suitability, and more in-depth analysis can be taken below or by using our EHR software comparison. C M CONVERTED MEDIA SHORTLISTING EHR VENDORS CHECKLIST Research EHR employed by similar sized practices in 1 6 Produce an RFI document and send to vendor shortlist the same specialty Identify market leading solutions which offer some 2 7 Narrow shortlist based on RFI responses support in your specialty Leverage professional network for recommendations Compile requirements and business processes in an 3 8 based on their experience RFP document Narrow shortlist based
    [Show full text]
  • Electronic Medical Record Ipad Application
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Supervised Undergraduate Student Research Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects and Creative Work 5-2013 Electronic Medical Record iPad Application Mischa Symmone Buckler [email protected] Dwayne Wiliam Flaherty [email protected] John Thomas Cotham [email protected] Mark Bellott [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_chanhonoproj Part of the Other Computer Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Buckler, Mischa Symmone; Flaherty, Dwayne Wiliam; Cotham, John Thomas; and Bellott, Mark, "Electronic Medical Record iPad Application" (2013). Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_chanhonoproj/1627 This Dissertation/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Supervised Undergraduate Student Research and Creative Work at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. EECS 400 Final Report Team Ecuador Mark Bellott Mischa Buckler John Cotham Willie Flaherty 4/26/2013 Team Ecuador: TRx iPad Application Introduction TRx is an iPad application developed for Humanitarian Health International to assist them during medical missions to underserved areas. Story [Author: John Cotham] Humanitarian Health International (HHI) is a non-profit group of medical professionals that travels to underserved towns in South America. On these trips, they provide simple but life- changing surgeries (e.g., hernia, cataracts, cleft lip). With the TRx application, HHI is leveraging new technology to help provide better care on these trips. It will be an integral part of their medical operations--helping them process and communicate with patients, keep individual records, and track their trips.
    [Show full text]
  • Carecloud, Inc
    SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION EDGAR FILING CareCloud, Inc. Form: 10-Q Date Filed: 2021-05-06 Corporate Issuer CIK: 1582982 © Copyright 2021, Issuer Direct Corporation. All Right Reserved. Distribution of this document is strictly prohibited, subject to the terms of use. UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 Form 10-Q (Mark one) [X]QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2021 or [ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission File Number 001-36529 CareCloud, Inc. (Formerly MTBC, Inc.) (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 22-3832302 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) Identification Number) 7 Clyde Road Somerset, New Jersey 08873 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) (732) 873-5133 (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of each class Trading Symbol(s) Name of each exchange on which registered Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share MTBC Nasdaq Global Market 11% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock, par value $0.001 per share MTBCP Nasdaq Global Market Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
    [Show full text]
  • Athenahealth Master Services Agreement Third Party Terms
    ATHENAHEALTH MASTER SERVICES AGREEMENT THIRD PARTY TERMS secrets. Client shall hold in confidence and take reasonable measures, but PART 1 - GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS. not less than the measures taken by Client to safeguard its own confidential The following Third Party Terms apply to all Athena sublicenses of information, to safeguard and prohibit access to, and copying or disclosure Third Party Items (as defined in the Athenahealth Master Services of, any and all confidential information and materials provided hereunder, Agreement) to Client pursuant to agreements that Athena has made with its including, but not limited to, confidential information in or about the Third third party licensors (“Third Party Licensors”): Party Items, any updates to any of them and any user manuals for them. A. Client will not modify the Third Party Items or the substance of the M. IN NO EVENT SHALL ATHENA OR A THIRD PARTY LICENSOR data contained therein. (OR ITS SUPPLIERS), OR THEIR RESPECTIVE OFFICERS, DIRECTORS, PARTNERS OR EMPLOYEES, BE LIABLE TO CLIENT OR ANY OTHER B. Except as authorized by the applicable Third Party Licensor or as PARTY FOR ANY CONSEQUENTIAL, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, permitted under Part 2 herein, Client will not use any Third Party Item (or any EXEMPLARY, PUNITIVE, RELIANCE OR SPECIAL DAMAGES, OR ANY data derived from it) in a computer service business or in network, time- LOSS OF USE, DATA OR, BUSINESS, PROFITS, ARISING OUT OF OR IN sharing, multiple-CPU or multiple-user arrangements (including the Internet CONNECTION WITH (1) THE USE OR PERFORMANCE OF THE THIRD and Intranets), or link or interface them with any other equipment, software, PARTY ITEM; (2) THE INTERRUPTION OF BUSINESS, DELAY OR data, network or communications system except in and as part of INABILITY TO USE ANY THIRD PARTY ITEM, RELATED EQUIPMENT OR athenaNet®.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Platform Architecture Based Upon SMART Apps Platform and the HL7 FHIR® (DSTU) Demonstrated at HIMSS14
    MAY 2014 Open Platform Architecture Based Upon SMART Apps Platform and the HL7 FHIR® (DSTU) Demonstrated at HIMSS14 By David Kreda, Translation Advisor, and Joshua Mandel MD, Lead Architect, SMART Platforms Project Harvard Medical School/Children’s Hospital Boston www.smartplatforms.org During the HIMSS14 Annual Conference (Feb- ferent internal architectures ruary 23-27, 2014 in Orlando, Florida), several and technologies, they healthcare IT exhibitors presented an eye-open- were nonetheless able to ing example of the potential of HL7’s newest supply the data via FHIR standard, FHIR® (Fast Healthcare Interoperabil- API calls made by the suite David Kreda ity Resources). The list of exhibitors included of SMART Apps that were Cerner, Intermountain Healthcare, Hewlett Pack- installed on their systems. ard, and Harris Corporation. They presented the Harris Corporation then SMART on FHIR Open Platform Architecture, demonstrated its services which combines FHIR and the open source, web- oriented architecture (SOA) standards based technology stack created by the service, which accepted SMART Platforms Project, a research effort based same FHIR API queries at Harvard Medical School and Children’s Hos- from the SMART apps, fed- pital Boston that enables real-time integration of erated queries to the same substitutable medical apps, or SMART apps, on EHR systems holding the EHR systems. patient data, and synthe- Josh Mandel, MD sized a cross system, longi- Three sophisticated EHR systems, including tudinal patient record, which was returned to the Cerner Millennium, HELP2 from Intermountain requesting SMART app. Healthcare, and VistA from the Veterans Health Administration, were each independently FHIR- Hewlett Packard, which engineered the SMART enabled in less than six weeks.
    [Show full text]
  • Small Practice Ambulatory Emr/Pm (10 Or Fewer Physicians) 2019
    SMALL PRACTICE AMBULATORY EMR/PM (10 OR FEWER PHYSICIANS) 2019 BUILDING STRONG FOUNDATIONS FOR CUSTOMER SUCCESS ® %/ Performance Report | January 2019 DRILL DEEPER TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 Executive Insights 6 Expanded Insights 29 Vendor Insights 31 AdvancedMD 45 eClinicalWorks 33 Allscripts 47 eMDs 35 Aprima 49 Greenway Health 37 athenahealth 51 Kareo 39 CareCloud 53 NextGen Healthcare 41 Cerner 55 Virence Health (GE Healthcare) 43 CureMD 57 Data Index 68 Vendor Executive Interview Details 1 EXECUTIVE INSIGHTS SMALL PRACTICE AMBULATORY EMR/PM (10 OR FEWER PHYSICIANS) 2019 BUILDING STRONG FOUNDATIONS FOR CUSTOMER SUCCESS As healthcare has moved beyond meaningful use, small practices have begun to expect more from their vendors and to look for EMRs that do more than meet basic regulatory requirements. As a result, EMR/PM satisfaction among small practices (10 or fewer physicians) has varied greatly over the past year—scores for a number of vendors have swung more than 10 percentage points (some positively, some negatively). To explore what the future holds for this market, KLAS spoke to hundreds of small practice customers about their EMR/PM experiences and needs and also interviewed executives and representatives from AdvancedMD, Allscripts, Aprima, athenahealth, Azalea Health, CareCloud, Cerner, CureMD, eMDs, Greenway Health, Kareo, NextGen, Quest Diagnostics, and Virence Health (GE Healthcare) to find out how these vendors plan to increase customer satisfaction going forward. What Are the Most Important Vendor/ NextGen Healthcare, CureMD, and Aprima Product Attributes for Small Practices? Most Aligned to Deliver Customer Success (n=57) The green bars represent the total tallies after New 7 Technology each need was weighted When asked to name the top things EMR/PM vendors should focus based on whether the respondent ranked it first, on, small practices overwhelmingly say that before addressing more Advanced Needs second, or third.
    [Show full text]