Winston Peters tells ministers touting compulsory te reo to get 'on the same page' Last updated 19:11, May 8 2018

The Maori Development Minister said today New Zealand is ready, “it's just the education system isn't”.

NZ First leader says if and Willie Jackson want to be in the Government they will need to watch their words.

Māori Development Minister Mahuta said compulsory te reo in schools was a matter of "not if but going to be when" on Tuesday morning.

This was a slight shift from the Government's current policy, which only calls for "universal availability" and integration of Te Reo into the primary school curriculum by 2025. Prime Minister has specifically avoided the word "compulsory."

Winston Peters opposes compulsory te reo being used as a Government policy.

Associate Māori Development Minister Willie Jackson made a similar slip up in December.

Peters, the deputy prime minister and leader of NZ First - who oppose compulsory te reo - issued a sharp rebuke towards Mahuta and Jackson on Tuesday afternoon.

Māori Development Minister Nanaia Mahuta: "In order to deliver on compulsory te reo Maori we would have to increase the ...

Māori Development Minister Nanaia Mahuta: "In order to deliver on compulsory te reo Maori we would have to increase the number of Maori teachers in our schools."

"Neither of them are speaking for the Government policy full stop," Peters said.

"If they want to be in this Government they'll be on the same page."

Peters did however leave open a gap for Mahuta's comments to be acceptable, saying comments about future policy were different.

"People are entitled to voice their opinion on things, they might think downstream some time in the history of this country this might be something that's happening, but as for something that's happening now: No." On Monday Ardern repeatedly failed to endorse the Green Party's calls for te reo to be made compulsory, saying "universally available needs to be the first step" in answer to questions about her support for it.

During the election campaign Ardern said that she would want to "keep that conversation going" once te reo was universally available in 2025.

But on Tuesday morning Mahuta made clear what that first step was towards in her mind - compulsory Te Reo.

"In order to deliver on compulsory te reo Maori we would have to increase the number of Maori teachers in our schools," Mahuta said.

Asked directly if that meant compulsory te reo was the end goal Mahuta said "I think it's only a matter of time".

"We need to ensure we have the pool of teachers available so they are able to go into schools to be able to teach te reo Māori," Mahuta said.

"If we look at mainstream schools like King's College, who have already made a commitment to compulsory Māori to Year 9, that's a signal that New Zealand is ready, it's just that the education system isn't."

This isn't the first time a Labour minister has drifted slightly from the party line on whether or not Te Reo would be compulsory.

Jackson said in December he "didn't think it was a difference" between compulsory and universally available.

"It depends how you look at it, we look at it as compulsory," he said.

But NZ First minister Shane Jones said his party were against making the language compulsory.

"Read my lips: Our party has no ambition to make te reo Māori compulsory in Invercargill or in any other schooling committee," Jones said.

"It is not something that we campaigned on. I cannot account for the different interpretations between the Minister of Māori Affairs and the Prime Minister."

"We are not antagonistic to the reo, but we know that if we move straight into any sort of compulsion Anglo boils and warts will emerge."

The incoming briefing to Mahuta revealed that in 2013 just 21.3 per cent of the Māori population were able to hold an everyday conversation in Te Reo and that number was dropping. If the trend continued only 12 percent of Māori would be able to speak Te Reo by 2038.

The Green Party's policy, which its new co-leader is pushing strongly for, is to make Te Reo compulsory in all public primary and secondary schools by 2030.

National's education spokeswoman Nikki Kaye said clarification was needed.

"Māori Development Minister Nanaia Mahuta has made it clear she wants to see the Green Party's policy to make Te Reo compulsory taken up," Kaye said.

"That puts her at odds with the Prime Minister and Deputy Prime Minister."

Answer the following questions 1. What does the title of the article mean? Winston Peters is trying to get everyone on the same page as him. 2. Who is the Maori Development Minister? Nanaia Mahuta 3. Which parties support having Te reo Maori compulsory? Labour 4. What are the views of Winston Peters? He does not want it just yet he might want it later in 2038 5. Does he oppose/support Te reo Maori being made compulsory? Winston Peters opposes compulsory Te reo in schools. 6. What is Winston Peter’s role in Parliament? Deputy prime minister 7. Does the Prime Minister Support making Te reo Maori compulsory? Yes she does support it. 8. Highlight the key information yellow in the article where you think she supports or opposes the compulsory of te reo Maori. 9. Highlight 1 Minister/Member blue of Parliament from each of the parties mentioned in the article? NZ First Green Party Labour 10. If the trend of Te reo Maori speakers continued. What is the percentage difference of Te reo Maori speakers predicted from 2013 to 2038? 9.3% 11. What does the term ‘At odds with someone’ mean? They don’t see their point of view. 12. Do you think Te reo Maori should be made compulsory? yes 13. Write a paragraph on why you support or oppose making te reo Maori compulsory. I support te reo being made compulsory because te reo maori is an official language of new Zealand.