DOCSLIB.ORG

Západočeská Univerzita V Plzni Fakulta Pedagogická

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Západočeská Univerzita V Plzni Fakulta Pedagogická View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by DSpace at University of West Bohemia Západočeská univerzita v Plzni Fakulta pedagogická Bakalářská práce JFK - KONSPIRAČNÍ TEORIE: PŘÍPAD JIMA GARRISONA Kateřina J. Musilová Plzeň 2012 University of West Bohemia Faculty of Education Undergraduate Thesis JFK CONSPIRACY: THE CASE OF JIM GARRISON Kateřina J. Musilová Plzeň 2012 Tato stránka bude ve svázané práci Váš původní formulář Zadáni bak. práce (k vyzvednutí u sekretářky KAN) Prohlašuji, že jsem práci vypracoval/a samostatně s použitím uvedené literatury a zdrojů informací. V Plzni dne 28. červen 2012 ……………………………. Kateřina J. Musilová ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank my supervisor, William Bradley Vice, Ph.D. for his patience, advice and support. ABSTRACT Musilová, Kateřina Josefína. University of West Bohemia. June, 2012. JFK Conspiracy: The Case of Jim Garrison. Supervisor: William Bradley Vice, Ph.D. The thesis describes the investigation of the assassination of President Kennedy and the circumstances leading to it conducted by Jim Garrison and his staff. Also the most questionable aspects of the Warren Commission Report and the mistakes the Warren Commission had made during its investigation are described here. This work presents evidence that caused the arrest of Lee Harvey Oswald and the possibility of him being innocent. There are also decried the conclusions of Jim Garrison and the main parts of the trial with Clay Shaw who was subsequently accused of being in charge of the conspiracy that killed the President. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION….............................................................................................................1 1 THE WARREN COMMISSION.........................................................................................3 2 THE MOST DISCUSSED EVIDENCE OF THE WARREN COMMISSION..................4 2.1 The Zapruder Film................................................................................................4 2.2 The Magic Bullet..................................................................................................5 2.3 The Possibility of the Second Shooter and More Shots.......................................7 2.4 The Autopsy of President Kennedy...................................................................10 3 LEE HARVEY OSWALD: ASSASSIN OR A PATSY?..................................................12 3.1 No Fingerprints..................................................................................................12 3.2 The 1st Class Shooting........................................................................................13 3.3 The Bulky Package.............................................................................................13 3.4 Oswald Outside the Building.............................................................................14 4 JACK LEON RUBY.........................................................................................................14 5 GARRISON’S INVESTIGATION...................................................................................15 5.1 The Beginning....................................................................................................15 5.2 The Second Impulse...........................................................................................16 5.3 The Key Aspects of the Investigation................................................................17 5.3.1 David William Ferrie...........................................................................17 5.3.2 The “Clay Bertrand” Theory................................................................18 5.3.3 The Changed Route.............................................................................19 5.3.4 The Neglect of the Safety Regulations................................................20 5.4 The Revelation of the Investigation....................................................................21 6 PRELIMINARY HEARING.............................................................................................22 6.1 Perry Raymond Russo........................................................................................23 6.2 Vernon J. Bundy, Jr. ….......................................................................................25 6.3 The Result of the Preliminary Hearing...............................................................25 7 THE ACTUAL TRIAL (STATE OF LUISIANA VERSUS CLAY SHAW)..........................26 7.1 The Witnesses.....................................................................................................26 7.1.1 Is Clay Shaw Clay Bertrand?...............................................................28 7.1.2 Shaw’s Connections to David Ferrie and Lee H. Oswald...................30 7.1.3 Defendant’s side..................................................................................32 7.2 The Most Interesting Evidence Presented..........................................................34 7.3 The End of the Trial............................................................................................34 7.4 The Verdict..........................................................................................................35 8 THE TRIALS AFTER THE TRIAL.................................................................................36 9 CONCLUSION.................................................................................................................38 WORKS CITED...................................................................................................................41 SUMMARY IN CZECH......................................................................................................46 INTRODUCTION The assassination of John Fitzgerald Kennedy is one of the most surprising, shocking and discussed events in American history. There were more than two hundred witnesses to the assassination as well as several home videos and an immense number of photographs and yet the circumstances remain unclear. There are a few theories about what exactly happened on 22nd November 1963 in the Dealey Plaza. There is, of course, Jim Garrison’s theory about C.I.A. and other intelligence agencies being involved and Clay “Bernard” Shaw being in charge. This is the only conspiracy theory to bring someone to justice for assassinating President Kennedy. G. Robert Blakey’s theory uses Garrison’s evidence and findings but with different results leading him to the Cuban mafia. According to James Files who claims to be the second shooter, he was hired by local crime boss Carlos Marcello, however, he also mentions connections to the C.I.A. and Lee H. Oswald. There is also a theory about French mafia being hired for the job but there is very little evidence. Probably the most controversial conspiracy theory was presented by the History Chanel in 2003. According to this theory, Lyndon B. Johnson Kennedy’s vice president and the President after the assassination was in charge of the assassination with the intelligence agencies acting on his order, but there were a lot of protests against this theory and History Chanel apologized for presenting it. Each theory has its own pros and cons but there are a few things that all of them have in common. For example, there is the fact that there must have been more than just one assassin, also they all disagree with the Report of the President’s Commission on the Assassination of President John F. Kennedy (Warren Commission report) and with the exhibit 399 (the “magic” bullet) being the bullet that caused all damage. Therefore, it was not easy to choose one theory. I was lucky because by that time there was series of documentary movies about the incident and I got to see a few of them and one in particular where I heard the name Jim Garrison for the first time. This name occurred in a documentary about conspiracies in which there were footages from old news and some shows where he made an appearance. It was obvious that the media did not like him very much which only increased my interest in the man who back then in my opinion deserved much more than ridicule. Jim Garrison was a New Orleans district attorney in 1960s and early 1970s who unlike most Americans did not believe the official version of the assassination of J. F. Kennedy. Now, of course, most people if not all of them have the same opinion about the 1 Warren Commission report since it was proved so many times by so many people that this report and its conclusions are dubious. This fact was actually the reason why later the commission slightly changed the report. However, back in late 1960s the people of America did not have any reason not to believe what the government told them. Therefore, the fact that New Orleans D.A. office did not believe and even investigate something the nation considered a closed case caused a lot of trouble. Most patriotic Americans did not like someone pointing out that their own government might have lied to them. It is only understandable that these people became hostile toward Jim Garrison for suggesting that something is wrong with the government of their beloved country, after all it is in human nature to fight anybody who would come and try to change the status quo in their minds. Until this day there are a lot of people supporting Garrison’s theory as well as people against Garrison’s investigation and its result and even though some of the accusations turned out to be justified they all concern mostly the matter of Clay
Load more

Recommended publications
  • XII. David Ferrie
    KII. DAVID FERRIE (388) In connection with its investigation of anti-Castro Cuban groups, the committee examined the activities of David William I'er- rie, an alleged associate of Lee Harvey Oswald. Among other conten- tions, it had been charged that Ferric was involved with at least one militant group of Cuban exiles and that he had made flights into Cuba in support of their counterrevolutionary activities there. (389) On Monday afternoon, November 25, 1963, Ferric, Moreover, voluntarily presented himself for questioning , to the New Orleans police, who had been looking for him in connection with the assassination of President Kennedy. (1) The New Orleans district attorney's office had earlier received information regarding a rela- tionship between Ferric and accused assassin Lee Harvey Oswald,(2) including allegations that : Ferric may have been acquainted with Oswald since Oswald's days in the Civil Air Patrol youth organization in 1954-55, Ferric may have given Oswald instruction in the use of a rifle and may have hypnotized Oswald to shoot the President, and that Ferric was in Texas on the day of the assassination and may have been Oswald's getaway pilot. (3) (390) Ferric denied all the contentions, stating that at the time of the President's assassination, he had been in New Orleans, busy with court matters for organized crime figure Carlos Marcello, who had been acquitted of immigration-related charges that same day. (4) Other individuals, including Marcello, Marcello's lawyer, the lawyer's secretary, and FBI agent Regis Kennedy, supported Ferrie's alibi. (5) (391) Ferric also gave a detailed account of his whereabouts for the period from the evening of November 22, 1963, until his appearance at the New Orleans police station.
    [Show full text]
  • Lawyer Says He Knows the Real 'Clay Bertrand'
    'HE NEW Yad'ioli? TIMES, THURSDAY, JUNE 29, 1967 Lawyer Says He Knows the Real 'Clay Bertrand' By GENE ROBERTS ' Mr. Andrews's testimony to a convicted burglar, was being Special to Tee New York Timex the Warren Commission about truthful when he charged re- NEW ORLEANS, June 28- the mysterious "Mr. Bertrand" cently that a member of Mr. A New Orleans lawyer said to- was one of the developments Garrison's staff had asked him day he knows the true identity that led Mr. Garrison to con- to "put something into" Mr. of a mystery figure who has, clude that President Kennedy's Shaw's apartment. played a major role in District death was the result of a con- He said he could not vouch Attorney Jim Garrison's investi- spiracy. for the story "words for word." gation of the Kennedy assassi- Mr. Andrews, a rotund man But, he said, "somebody In the nation. who talks in Damon Runyon district attorney's office told Dean A. Andrews, the lawyer. style, told Warren Commission me a long time back that Can- said the real "Clay Bertrand" lawyers that Clay Bertrand sent cler had been asked to break Is the operator of a local bar Lee Harvey Oswald to his law Into Shaw's apartment." and not Clay L. Shaw, a busi- office in the summer of 1983. He also said he was "con- nessman arrested after he was Oswald is the man who, accord- stantly surprised" at the way accused by Mr. Garrison of par- ing to the commission, killed An which Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Principia Discordia.Pdf
    RAW Intro | Omar Intro | Title Page | Index | Version Notes | INTRODUCTION You hold in your hands one of the Great Books of our century fnord. Some Great Books are recognized at once with a fusillade of critical huzzahs and gonfolons, like Joyce’s Ulysses. Others appear almost furtively and are only discovered 50 years later, like Moby Dick or Mendel’s great essay on genetics. The Principia Discordia entered our space-time continuum almost as unobtrusively as a cat-burglar creeping over a windowsill. In 1968, virtually nobody had heard of this wonderful book. In 1970, hundreds of people from coast to coast were talking about it and asking the identity of the mysterious author, Malaclypse the Younger. Rumors swept across the continent, from New York to Los Angeles, from Seattle to St. Joe. Malaclypse was actually Alan Watts, one heard. No, said another legend – the Principia was actually the work of the Sufi Order. A third, very intriguing myth held that Malaclypse was a pen-name for Richard M. Nixon, who had allegedly composed the Principia during a few moments of lucidity. I enjoyed each of these yarns and did my part to help spread them. I was also careful never to contradict the occasional rumors that I had actually written the whole thing myself during an acid trip. The legendry, the mystery, the cult grew very slowly. By the mid- 1970’s, thousands of people, some as far off as Hong Kong and Australia, were talking about the Principia, and since the original was out of print by then, xerox copies were beginning to circulate here and there.
    [Show full text]
  • Sophistic Synthesis in JFK Assassination Rhetoric. 24P
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 400 532 CS 215 483 AUTHOR Gilles, Roger TITLE Sophistic Synthesis in JFK Assassination Rhetoric. PUB DATE Apr 93 NOTE 24p.; Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Conference on College Composition and Communication (44th, San Diego, CA, April 1-3, 1993). PUB TYPE Reports Evaluative/Feasibility (142) Speeches /Conference Papers (150) Historical Materials (060) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC01 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Higher Education; Historiography; Popular Culture; *Presidents of the United States; *Rhetorical Criticism; *Rhetorical Theory; *United States History IDENTIFIERS 1960s; *Assassinations; Classical Rhetoric; Garrison (Jim); *Kennedy (John F); Rhetorical Stance; Social Needs ABSTRACT The rhetoric surrounding the assassination of John F. Kennedy offers a unique testing ground for theories about the construction of knowledge in society. One dilemma, however, is the lack of academic theorizing about the assassination. The Kennedy assassination has been left almost exclusively in the hands of "nonhistorians," i.e., politicians, filmmakers, and novelists. Their struggle to reach consensus is an opportunity to consider recent issues in rhetorical theory, issues of knowledge and belief, argument and narrative, history and myth. In "Rereading the Sophists: Classical Rhetoric Refigured," Susan C. Jarratt uses the sophists and their focus on "nomos" to propose "an alternative analytic to the mythos/logos antithesis" characteristic of more Aristotelian forms of rhetorical analysis. Two basic features of sophistic historiography interest Jarratt: (1) the use of narrative structures along with or opposed to argumentative structures; and (2) the rhetorical focus on history to creative broad cultural meaning in the present rather than irrefutable fact,about the past. Jarratt's book lends itself to a 2-part reading of Jim Garrison's "On the Trail of the Assassins"--a rational or Aristotelian reading and a nomos-driven or myth-making reading.
    [Show full text]
  • JFK Characters
    Page 1 JFK Characters As you start reading about the JFK John Abt assassination, you quickly realize that there are thousands of people involved John Abt was a lawyer for the Communist party. in one way or another. Keeping track of When LHO was arrested in Dallas, he asked for Abt who’s who gets to be a challenge. to represent him. LHO wasn’t a communist or That’s why I created this list of some of marxist, but he pretended to be as part of his CIA the major (and minor) players in the undercover assignment. Asking to have Abt as his complex story. It is designed to give lawyer was intended to be a signal to his you a quick idea of the most relevant intelligence handlers that his cover was still intact facts about each of the characters and that he was still playing along. He wanted his listed, and it is intended as a quick handlers to know that they could count on his reference tool. (However, just reading silence. down the list of characters is one way to get a lot of information about the events of November 22, 1963, in Juan Adames Dallas, Texas.) Juan Adames provided information to HSCA It is by no means complete, as that is (House Select Committee on Investigations) beyond my scope. But I do plan to keep investigator Gaeton Fonzi, working in Miami. adding characters as I learn more Adames told Fonzi about Bernardo Gonzales de about the death of JFK. Torres Alvarez (de Torres), who had been working for CIA since 1962.
    [Show full text]
  • Recipesholdings, & User Guide
    LLC 10-SECOND RECIPESHOLDINGS, & USER GUIDE CAPBRAN IMPORTANT SAFEGUARDS • AFTER BLENDING INGREDIENTS, REMOVE THE CROSS BLADE ASSEMBLY—ALLOW THE VESSEL WITH ITS CONTENTS TO SETTLE AND TO RELEASE ANY PRESSURE THAT MAY HAVE BUILT UP DURING THE EXTRACTION PROCESS. IF YOU WILL NOT CONSUME IT IMMEDIATELY, SAVE THESE INSTRUCTIONS USE THE STAY FRESH LID TO CLOSE THE CONTAINER. UNSCREW THE LID AND RELEASE HOUSEHOLD USE ONLY PRESSURE PERIODICALLY IF STORING LONGER THAN A FEW HOURS TO RELEASE ANY ADDED PRESSURE THAT MAY HAVE BUILT UP DUE TO FERMENTATION. Read all instructions before operating the Magic Bullet. When using electrical • NEVER PERMIT ANY BLENDED MIXTURE TO SIT INSIDE A CUP SEALED WITH A CROSS appliances, basic safety precautions should always be followed, including: BLADE BASE WITHOUT FIRST RELEASING THE PRESSURE. • DO NOT ALLOW BLENDED CONTENTS TO SIT FOR LONG PERIODS IN A SEALED GENERAL SAFETY CONTAINER. THE SUGARS IN FRUITS AND VEGETABLES CAN FERMENT, CAUSING PRESSURE TO BUILD UP AND EXPANDLLC IN THE VESSEL WHICH CAN CAUSE INGREDIENTS • Cross blades are sharp. Handle carefully. TO BURST AND SPRAY OUT WHEN MOVED OR OPENED. UNCSCREW THE LID AND OPEN • Always use your Magic Bullet on a clean, flat, hard, dry surface, never on cloth or paper THE CUP FOR A FEW MOMENTS TO RELEASE ANY PRESSURE THAT HAS BUILT UP. which may block the fan vents and cause overheating. • RELEASE PRESSURE BY CAREFULLY UNSCREWING THE LID AND OPENING THE CUP FOR • Do not immerse the cord, plug or base in water or other liquids. A FEW MOMENTS. • Close supervision is necessary when any appliances are used by or near children.
    [Show full text]
  • Apocrypha Discordiadiscordia Ðe Seconde Edityon
    ApocryphaApocrypha DiscordiaDiscordia Ðe Seconde Edityon Compy’eled fromme Dyverƒ Sorƒeƒ by Hiƒ Wholineß ðe Rev DrJon Swabey Wið ILLUMINATIONS by Pope Phil Wlodarczyk III To the Prettiest One and to Blade, without whom. and in honour: Mal2 and Omar; Greg and Kerry; A couple of guys, A couple of saints. Dance with the Goddess (Jiggy-Jiggy) ILLUMINATIONS BY POPE PHIL WLODARCZYK III Content and Layout The Rev DrJon Swabey & a whole bunch of other Erisians, Discordians and Weirdos far too many to list here on this tiny page (sorry). Where identified, they’re all credited in the text. All effort has been made to verify the (K) status of individual items, however in the event of non - (K) items being accidentally included, please notify, and said items will be removed in subsequent editions. ( K ) 2001 ALL RITES REVERSED REPRINT WHAT YOU LIKE Second Edition 2002 3 5 7 9 8 6 4 2 Apocrypha Discordia with ILLUMINATIONS by Pope Phil Wlodarczyk III Assembled by His Wholiness the Rev DrJon on behalf of The Committee for Public Safety Approved for abuse in schools Give me your tired, your poor, Your huddled masses yearning to be free The wretched refuse of your teeming shore This country always needs more Soylent Green HAIL ERIS! — καλλιχτι — ALL HAIL DISCORDIA! Eristroduction You should have put that in there...”I found out I was dying, and used my last days to create a Discordian Manual...” Prince MuChao, Private correspodance, January 2002 Of course, I was wrong, Little Deluded Dupe that I am. Seven days before I was scheduled for Surgery, that quiet voice which I imagine also talks to Zen monks, Sufi mullahs and other Disreputable Persons at the End, rapped sharply on my skull and told me to get my shit in order within the week.
    [Show full text]
  • JFK's Death: the Case of Jim Garrison
    28 f pa' AGAZINE PAGE FOUR) NEW YORK POST, SATURDAY, JUNE 24, 1967 • f knew that his testimony in the hearing had been false? TOR:RES: Well, just exactly as I said: he said, "The reason rm doin this because it's the only way I can get cut loose," and the impresalon I got was that, that JFK's Death: The it was an out front lie. MeGEE: JIM GARRISON TOLD A BBC EzroRT- er he uses what he calls "objecting tests" to make sure his witnesses are telling the truth. One such Case of Jim Garrison test Is a polygraph, the lie-detector. On the morning he testified. Vernon Sunday was given a liealetector test. NBC News has learned that the results of the • This week NBC took a look at the controversial test Indicated that Bundy was lying. faveshgation being conducted by New Orleans Dis- Assistant District Attorney Charles Ward was in- trict Attorney Jim Garrison. Following are excerpts formed of this. Ward Went to Garrison. He told Gar- from that program, narrated by Prank McGee. rison that in view of the outcome of the lie-detector test, the indication that Bundy was lying, Bundy McGEEi Many Americans doubt the findings of should not be allowed to testify. Despite this, Bundy the Warren Commission. Only one has had and used WAS put on the witness stand by Garrison. He testified legal powers to Investigate those findings. That one against Shaw. Partly as a result of that testimony, is Jim Garrison, the District Attorney of New Or- Shaw was held for trial.
    [Show full text]
  • Lee Harvey Oswald's Last Lover? the Warren Commission Missed A
    Lee Harvey Oswald’s Last Lover? The Warren Commission Missed A Significant JFK Assassination Connection It is reasonable to be suspicious of claims that challenge our understanding of history. But it is unreasonable to ignore evidence because it might change one’s mind or challenge the positions that one has taken in public. History shows us that new information is rarely welcome.–Edward T. Haslam Lee Harvey Oswald was an innocent man who was a government intelligence agent. He faithfully carried out assignments such as entering the USSR and pretending to be pro-Castro. Lee Harvey Oswald was a brave, good man, a patriot and a true American hero . .–Judyth Vary Baker If Judyth Vary Baker is telling the truth, it will change the way we think about the Kennedy assassination.–John McAdams Oswald in New Orleans in 1963 Lyndon B. Johnson famously remarked that Lee Harvey Oswald “was quite a mysterious fellow.” One of the most enigmatic episodes in Oswald’s adventure-filled 24-year life was his 1963 sojourn in his birthplace, New Orleans, where he arrived by bus on Apr. 25 and from which he departed by bus on Sept. 25, less than two months before the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. The Warren Report The Warren Commission, which investigated the assassination and concluded that Oswald, acting alone, was the assassin, found nothing of significance in Oswald’s 1963 stay in New Orleans. The picture painted by the 1964 Warren Report is of a lowly, lonely and disgruntled leftist and pro-Castroite who occasionally pretended to be an anti-Castro rightist.
    [Show full text]
  • JFK: Polémica Abierta EDMON ROCH
    JFK: Polémica abierta EDMON ROCH "Cuando se ha eliminado lo imposible, aquello que queda, aunque parezca improbable, ha de ser la verdad" (El Signo de los Cuatro, de Sir Arthur CONAN DOYLE, citado por Jim GARRISON en Tras la pista de los asesinos). "Hitler dijo que cuando mayor es la mentira, más gente se la cree" (Jim GARRISON -Kevin Costner- en JFK .Caso abierto). JFK. CASO ABIERTO Título original: JFK (USA, 1991). Producción: Ixtlan Corporation y A. Kitman Ho, para Warner Bros., Le Studio Canal+, Regency Enterprises y Alcor Films. Director: Oliver Stone. Productores: A. Kitman Ho y Oliver Stone. Guión: Oliver Stone y Zachary Sklar, según los libros On the trial of the assassins, de Jim Garrison y Crossfire: The Plot that Killed Kennedy, de Jim Marrs. Productor ejecutivo: Arnon Milchan. Director de fotografía: Robert Richardson. Música: John Williams. Montaje: Joe Hutshing y Pietro Scalia. Intérpretes: Kevin Costner (Jim Garrison), Tommy Lee Jones (Clay Shaw), Laurie Metcalf (Susie Cox), Gary Oldman (Lee Harvey Oswald), Michael Rooker (Bill Broussard), Jay O. Sanders (Lou Ivon), Sissy Spacek (Liz Garrison), Joe Pesci (David Ferrie), Jack Lemmon (Jack Martin), Donald Sutherland (Coronel X), Sally Kirkland (Rose Cherarnie), Ed Asner (Guy Banister), Vincent D'Onofrio (Bill Newman),Brian Doyle-Murray (Jack Ruby ), Walter Matthau (Senador Long), John Candy (Dean Andrews), Kevin Bacon (Willie O'Keefe), Jo Anderson (Julia Ann Mercer), John Finnegan (Juez Haggerty), y Perry R. Russo (patrón del bar enojado) y Jim Garrison (Juez Earl Warren). Color -Blanco y negro -189 min. Pocas veces una película ha hecho correr tantos ríos de tinta como JFK, la última obra de Oliver Stone.
    [Show full text]
  • Clay Shaw Trial 3: 2-6-69
    REPRODUCED AT THE NATIONAL ARCHIVES __~ -~- -- : ._ - AFTERNOON OF FEBRUARY 6, 1969 THIS VOLUME IS FOLLOJED BY AN . @WY cl?&& LuLtJ.l+) ALREADY TRANSCRIBED VOLUME,,OF 133.:PAGES, TO THE END OF THE AFTERNOON OF THE FIRST DAY. , Dietrich & Piekett, Inc. ! “s-- .v. ZY . .. StQxofjpihth .--. .: _. .a ‘333ST. CHARLES AVENUE, SUITE 1221 -_-. NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA 70130-522-3111 .-- A I L ^.. 0 + ., ._ , - ,. , _ . .._.. 1 i 1 . -Pursuant to the recess, the proceed- d? 2 ings herein were resumed at 1:40 o'clock p.m., 3 appearances being the same as heretofore 4 noted in the record . 5 THE COURT: 6 Gentlemen, I have been requested by Mr. 7 ., ._' Bob Jones, representing the .news 8 media, all angles of it, to take !..L 9 a short recess after Mr. Dymond ;-... : : .” 10 makes his opening remarks. I told 11 them I would comply with that re- 12 quest. 13 (Jury returned to the box.) 14 THE COURT: 1 . 15 Are the State and the Defense ready'to 16 proceed? 17 MR. ALCOCK: 18 We are ready. 19 MR. DYMOND: 20 The Defense is ready. 21 THE COURT: . : !2 Make a note that the Jury is in panel, !3 the Defendant present, and both !4 sides ready to proceed. !S The status' of the case is that the State DIETRICH & PICKBI3?, Inc. COURT REPORTERS . sun-x 1221 . 333 ~AINT~HNWSA~ENUB .~ . .-.. .., I... .,__.,. _ has made their opening remarks, and 2 it is the option of the Defense 3 whether they wish to make an open- 4 ing statement or not.
    [Show full text]
  • Was Lee Harvey Oswald in North Dakota
    Chapter 28 Lee Harvey Oswald; North Dakota and Beyond John Delane Williams and Gary Severson North Dakota would become part of the JFK assassination story subsequent to a letter, sent by Mrs. Alma Cole to President Johnson. That letter [1] follows (the original was in Mrs. Cole’s handwriting): Dec 11, 1963 President Lyndon B. Johnson Dear Sir, I don’t know how to write to you, and I don’t know if I should or shouldn’t. My son knew Lee Harvey Oswald when he was at Stanley, North Dakota. I do not recall what year, but it was before Lee Harvey Oswald enlisted in the Marines. The boy read communist books then. He told my son He had a calling to kill the President. My son told me, he asked him. How he would know which one? Lee Harvey Oswald said he didn’t know, but the time and place would be laid before him. There are others at Stanley who knew Oswald. If you would check, I believe what I have wrote will check out. Another woman who knew of Oswald and his mother, was Mrs. Francis Jelesed she had the Stanley Café, (she’s Mrs. Harry Merbach now.) Her son, I believe, knew Lee Harvey Oswald better than mine did. Francis and I just thought Oswald a bragging boy. Now we know different. We told our sons to have nothing to do with him (I’m sorry, I don’t remember the year.) This letter is wrote to you in hopes of helping, if it does all I want is A Thank You.
    [Show full text]