<<

pinetorum (Le Conte) woodland

State Distribution

Best Survey Period

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Status: State special concern 1983). No other microtine in Michigan has the combi- nation of a short tail, small body, and reddish on the Global and state rank: G5/S3S4 sides (Kurta 1995). The southern bog (Synaptomys cooperii), which also has a short tail, may Family: Muridae (, mice, , and ) be confused with the . However, it can be Range: The woodland vole is found throughout the distinguished from the woodland vole by its grizzled eastern United States from Maine to Texas. It is absent pelage and grooved upper incisors (Kurta 1995). in portions of New England, the Florida peninsula, and Best survey time: The woodland vole is a fairly cryptic the northern portions of the upper Great Lakes Region due to its semi-fossorial (Baker 1983). (Kurta 1995). The best way to document its presence is with traps State distribution: The woodland vole population is (e.g., H.B. Sherman live-traps). Abundances typically patchy and local in Michigan (less than 100 specimens are highest during late summer and fall and it is during taken). However, there is potential for this species to this time period that trapping efforts should be most occur throughout most of the state. This species is successful. However, even with fairly intensive trapping known from 20 counties in the lower peninsula. These efforts it is often difficult to assess the abundance and/or counties include Allegan, Benzie, Barry, Berrien, presence of this species since it is somewhat trap-shy. Calhoun, Cheboygon, Charlevoix, Clare, Clinton, Furthermore, wet, cold weather can significantly lower Crawford, Emmet, Gratiot, Ingham, Kalamazoo, trapping rates. Evidence of its may be apparent Leelanau, Livingston, Oakland, Saginaw, Shiawassee, in leaf litter as well as its angular chew marks on and Washtenaw Counties. Woodland voles have not vegetation near or in passageways, although its passage- been documented in the Upper Peninsula. (Baker 1983). ways are difficult to distinguish from tunnels (Benton 1955). Recognition: The woodland vole is a small that has very small eyes and ears and it has two pairs of Habitat: The woodland vole can be found in a wide mammary glands. The front feet have four toes and the array of habitats including orchards, forested , back five. Its tail is bicolored and very short (18 mm – bogs, fence rows, and forests. However, greatest abun- 24 mm and typically shorter than the length of the hind dances typically are located in dry hardwood forests of foot) (Kurta 1995). The pelage is dense, short, soft, oak, beech, and maple. Sandy soils and a thick litter mole-like, and reddish or chestnut brown on the layer seem to be preferred by this species due to its sides. Individual hairs are dark at the base and dusky semi-fossorial nature (Kurta 1995). tipped. Under-surfaces are lead gray with pale tipped hairs, which gives the appearance of a buff wash (Baker

Michigan Natural Features Inventory P.O. Box 30444 - Lansing, MI 48909-7944 Phone: 517-373-1552 woodland vole, Page 2

Biology: The home range for the woodland vole is cuts. quite small and they rarely wander more than 15-30m from their . Breeding typically takes place from Research needs: A better understanding of the state’s January through October, but breeding can potentially distribution of this species and its relative rarity/com- occur throughout the year. Woodland vole populations monality within Michigan. Further, research is needed (as with most vole species) frequently exhibit 1-4 year to gather a better understanding of the habitat require- population cycles (Benton 1955). Nests are typically ments for this species and the impacts of forest manage- located in underground tunnels or beneath a root or log ment practices in order to derive useful management and are constructed of grasses and leaves. As many as 4 recommendations. litters per year may be produced consisting of 2-4 Related abstracts: red-shouldered , northern young. The young are naked when born and are depen- goshawk, box turtle, wooded dune and swale, goblin dent on parental care for approximately 24 days (Baker moonwort, ginseng 1983). When foraging, woodland voles travel along subterranean passageways that they have excavated or Selected references they may make use of existing mole tunnels. They feed on a wide assortment of foods including roots, tubers, Albert, D.A. 1994. Regional landscape ecosystems of fruits, and vegetation (Benton 1955, Baker 1983). Michigan, Minnesota, and Wisconsin: A working Winter caches of food are stored underground within map classification. USDA Forest Service - North Central their passageway system. During periods of a prolonged Forest Experiment Station. Gen. Tech. Report NC – 178. shortage of food woodland voles may girdle trees or resort to coprophagy (i.e., eating fecal matter) (Kurta Baker, R.H. 1983. Michigan . Michigan 1995). Associate species include the woodland jumping State Univ. Press, E. Lansing, MI. 642 pp. (Napaeozapus insignis), southern Benton, A.H. 1955. “Observations of the life history of (Synaptomys cooperii), pygmy (Sorex hoyi), the northern pine mouse”. J. . 36(1):53-63. northern short-tailed shrew (Blarina brevicauda), eastern mole (Scalopus aquaticus), and Peromyscus Kurta, A. 1995. Mammals of the Great Lakes Region. spp. Woodland voles, as with most small mammals, are Univ. of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor. 376 pp. prey for species such as the (Procyon lotor), northern short-tailed shrew (Blarina brevicauda), red ------ (Vulpes vulpes), mink (Mustela vison), opposum (Didelphis virginiana), (Mephitis mephi- Abstract citation tis), and various raptors (Baker 1983). Cooper, J.L. 2000. Special abstract for Micro- Conservation and management: The distribution and tus pinetorum (woodland vole). Michigan Natural abundance of this species is not well known in Michi- Features Inventory, Lansing, MI. 2 pp. gan. However, a pattern of habitat preference seems to be evident when comparing Michigan Natural Features Inventory woodland vole occurrence records to “Re- gional Ecosystems of Michigan” (Albert 1994). These habitats include well drained sandy soils, steep topogra- phy (particularly sandy ridges), large sand dunes, high outwash plains, and well drained sand hills. Little is known about how to best manage this species. Benton (1955) suggested that light soil and a deep humus layer are of primary importance and cover is of secondary importance. Therefore, conservation of deciduous forests, particularly those with steep sandy slopes may be of primary importance in protecting this species. Further, maintaining dead and down woody vegetation should be encouraged, since it is an essential component for small mammal cover in general. Uneven-aged silvicultural prescriptions (e.g., individual tree selection Copyright 2004 Michigan State University Board of Trustees. and group selection cuts) for shade tolerant tree species Michigan State University Extension is an affirmative-action, is probably a compatible management strategy, particu- equal-opportunity organization. larly when tree tops are left on the site after harvest. In situations in which even-aged management is an Funding for abstract provided by Michigan Department of objective (i.e., shade intolerant species), harvest strate- Natural Resources - Wildlife Division, Non-Game Program. gies could incorporate retention of dead and down woody debris and leaving clumps of live trees in clear- 3-00/jlc

Michigan Natural Features Inventory P.O. Box 30444 - Lansing, MI 48909-7944 Phone: 517-373-1552