Rock Type IGNEOUS ROCKS SEDIMENTARY ROCKS

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Rock Type IGNEOUS ROCKS SEDIMENTARY ROCKS Texture, average. observations rock name Rock Type size of minerals, clasts or grains Felsic - Light colored pumice Frothy Mafic - Dark colored (“none”) Dark to black - felsic Glassy obsidian (DOES NOT follow normal color index) Felsic - Light colored rhyolite Fine grained Intermediate andesite Extrusive, volcanic IGNEOUS ROCKS Mafic - Dark colored basalt Rock formed from a molten amygdaloidal Modifier for extrusive rocks with trapped gas bubbles that might fill in with minerals state or vesicular Interlocking homogenous Felsic - Light colored (“none”) crystalline texture – no Medium grained Intermediate dacite apparent preferred Dikes, sills, etc. orientation to the mineral Mafic - Dark colored diabase grains Felsic - Light colored granite Coarse grained Intermediate diorite Generally intrusive or plutonic Mafic - Dark colored gabbro Ultramafic peridotite porphyry or Modifier for extrusive rocks with fine matrix and well developed crystals porphyritic Rounded clasts conglomerate Coarse Fragments Angular clasts breccia “Clean” quartz (may be other minor minerals as well) sandstone SEDIMENTARY Sand sized fragments ROCKS “Dirty” with rock fragments & clay graywacke Rocks formed from other Fine grained - cannot see Nonfoliated siltstone rocks or existing materials. individual clasts or grains Foliated shale Consolidated detrital clasts Fossiliferous Mostly shell fragments coquina (grains), chemical Softer - reacts with dilute acid limestone precipitates, and or Chemical - fine grain biological residue Harder - does not react with dilute acid chert bedded to massive salt which is the mineral halite rock salt Evaporates Bedded to massive gypsum rock gypsum Dull – metallic sound when tapped with metal object slate Foliated, very fine grained-no Foliated, shiny due to increased size of METAMORPHIC visible minerals phyllite ROCKS micaceous minerals (almost see them) Foliated - medium to coarse Individual mineral grains visible. Major mineral(s) Rocks changed by heat schist grain included as name modifiers (ex. Biotite Schist) and or pressure but not melted. Alternating layers of light (felsic) and dark (mafic) Color banded gneiss Interlocking, mixed minerals crystalline textures, Distinct layering - often highly Alternating layers of felsic igneous rock (light) and migmatite commonly with an folded and contorted mafic gneiss (dark) orientation to the minerals. Soft – reacts with dilute acid marble Rocks can be folded or Non-foliated with non-oriented Hard – does not react with dilute acid quartzite crenulated. grains Interlocking amphibole / hornblende crystals amphibolite Items in italics are not present or are very rare in Michigan It is important to note that there are many, many intermediate steps or subdivisions of these main divisions provided here. Geology is full of "shades of gray," and the naming of rocks is not an exception. If you have a comment, correction, addition or deletion, please contact, Steven E. Wilson at [email protected]. THANKS! .
Recommended publications
  • Source and Bedrock Distribution of Gold and Platinum-Group Metals in the Slate Creek Area, Northern.Chistochina Mining District, East-Central Alaska
    Source and Bedrock Distribution of Gold and Platinum-Group Metals in the Slate Creek Area, Northern.Chistochina Mining District, East-Central Alaska By: Jeffrey Y. Foley and Cathy A. Summers Open-file report 14-90******************************************1990 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Manuel Lujan, Jr., Secretary BUREAU OF MINES T S Arv. Director TN 23 .U44 90-14 c.3 UNITED STATES BUREAU OF MINES -~ ~ . 4,~~~~1 JAMES BOYD MEMORIAL LIBRARY CONTENTS Abstract 1 Introduction 2 Acknowledgments 2 Location, access, and land status 2 History and production 4 Previous work 8 Geology 8 Regional and structural geologic setting 8 Rock units 8 Dacite stocks, dikes, and sills 8 Limestone 9 Argillite and sandstone 9 Differentiated igneous rocks north of the Slate Creek Fault Zone 10 Granitic rocks 16 Tertiary conglomerate 16 Geochemistry and metallurgy 18 Mineralogy 36 Discussion 44 Recommendations 45 References 47 ILLUSTRATIONS 1. Map of Slate Creek and surrounding area, in the northern Chistochina Mining District 3 2. Geologic map of the Slate Creek area, showing sample localities and cross section (in pocket) 3. North-dipping slaty argillite with lighter-colored sandstone intervals in lower Miller Gulch 10 4. North-dipping differentiated mafic and ultramafic sill capping ridge and overlying slaty argillite at upper Slate Creek 11 5. Dike swarm cutting Jurassic-Cretaceous turbidites in Miller Gulch 12 6 60-ft-wide diorite porphyry and syenodiorite porphyry dike at Miller Gulch 13 7. Map showing the locations of PGM-bearing mafic and ultramafic rocks and major faults in the east-central Alaska Range 14 8. Major oxides versus Thornton-Tuttle differentiation index 17 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Bedrock Geology Glossary from the Roadside Geology of Minnesota, Richard W
    Minnesota Bedrock Geology Glossary From the Roadside Geology of Minnesota, Richard W. Ojakangas Sedimentary Rock Types in Minnesota Rocks that formed from the consolidation of loose sediment Conglomerate: A coarse-grained sedimentary rock composed of pebbles, cobbles, or boul- ders set in a fine-grained matrix of silt and sand. Dolostone: A sedimentary rock composed of the mineral dolomite, a calcium magnesium car- bonate. Graywacke: A sedimentary rock made primarily of mud and sand, often deposited by turbidi- ty currents. Iron-formation: A thinly bedded sedimentary rock containing more than 15 percent iron. Limestone: A sedimentary rock composed of calcium carbonate. Mudstone: A sedimentary rock composed of mud. Sandstone: A sedimentary rock made primarily of sand. Shale: A deposit of clay, silt, or mud solidified into more or less a solid rock. Siltstone: A sedimentary rock made primarily of sand. Igneous and Volcanic Rock Types in Minnesota Rocks that solidified from cooling of molten magma Basalt: A black or dark grey volcanic rock that consists mainly of microscopic crystals of pla- gioclase feldspar, pyroxene, and perhaps olivine. Diorite: A plutonic igneous rock intermediate in composition between granite and gabbro. Gabbro: A dark igneous rock consisting mainly of plagioclase and pyroxene in crystals large enough to see with a simple magnifier. Gabbro has the same composition as basalt but contains much larger mineral grains because it cooled at depth over a longer period of time. Granite: An igneous rock composed mostly of orthoclase feldspar and quartz in grains large enough to see without using a magnifier. Most granites also contain mica and amphibole Rhyolite: A felsic (light-colored) volcanic rock, the extrusive equivalent of granite.
    [Show full text]
  • Neuro-Fuzzy Classification of Felsic Lava Geomorphology at Alarcon Rise, Mexico Christina Hefron Maschmeyer University of South Carolina
    University of South Carolina Scholar Commons Theses and Dissertations 2016 Neuro-Fuzzy Classification of Felsic Lava Geomorphology at Alarcon Rise, Mexico Christina Hefron Maschmeyer University of South Carolina Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd Part of the Geology Commons Recommended Citation Maschmeyer, C. H.(2016). Neuro-Fuzzy Classification of Felsic Lava Geomorphology at Alarcon Rise, Mexico. (Master's thesis). Retrieved from https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd/3566 This Open Access Thesis is brought to you by Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NEURO-FUZZY CLASSIFICATION OF FELSIC LAVA GEOMORPHOLOGY AT ALARCON RISE, MEXICO by Christina Hefron Maschmeyer Bachelor of Science College of Charleston, 2014 Bachelor of Arts College of Charleston, 2014 Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Master of Science in Geological Sciences College of Arts and Sciences University of South Carolina 2016 Accepted by: Scott White, Director of Thesis Michael Bizimis, Reader Brian Dreyer, Reader Lacy Ford, Senior Vice Provost and Dean of Graduate Studies © Copyright by Christina Hefron Maschmeyer, 2016 All Rights Reserved. ii DEDICATION This thesis is dedicated to Dr. Jim Carew for making me go to graduate school. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Data for this study were collected during cruises in 2012 aboard the R/V Zephyr and R/V Western Flyer and during 2015 on the R/V Rachel Carson and R/V Western Flyer from the Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute. I want to thank the captains, crews, ROV pilots and science parties for their work during these expeditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2 Alaska’S Igneous Rocks
    Chapter 2 Alaska’s Igneous Rocks Resources • Alaska Department of Natural Resources, 2010, Division of Geological and Geophysical Surveys, Alaska Geologic Materials Center website, accessed May 27, 2010, at http://www.dggs.dnr.state.ak.us/?link=gmc_overview&menu_link=gmc. • Alaska Resource Education: Alaska Resource Education website, accessed February 22, 2011, at http://www.akresource.org/. • Barton, K.E., Howell, D.G., and Vigil, J.F., 2003, The North America tapestry of time and terrain: U.S. Geological Survey Geologic Investigations Series I-2781, 1 sheet. (Also available at http://pubs.usgs.gov/imap/i2781/.) • Danaher, Hugh, 2006, Mineral identification project website, accessed May 27, 2010, at http://www.fremontica.com/minerals/. • Digital Library for Earth System Education, [n.d.], Find a resource—Bowens reaction series: Digital Library for Earth System Education website, accessed June 10, 2010, at http://www.dlese.org/library/query.do?q=Bowens%20reaction%20series&s=0. • Edwards, L.E., and Pojeta, J., Jr., 1997, Fossils, rocks, and time: U.S. Geological Survey website. (Available at http://pubs.usgs.gov/gip/fossils/contents.html.) • Garden Buildings Direct, 2010, Rocks and minerals: Garden Buildings Direct website, accessed June 4, 2010, at http://www.gardenbuildingsdirect.co.uk/Article/rocks-and- minerals. • Illinois State Museum, 2003, Geology online–GeoGallery: Illinois State Museum Society database, accessed May 27, 2010 at http://geologyonline.museum.state.il.us/geogallery/. • Knecht, Elizebeth, designer, Pearson, R.W., and Hermans, Majorie, eds., 1998, Alaska in maps—A thematic atlas: Alaska Geographic Society, 100 p. Lillie, R.J., 2005, Parks and plates—The geology of our National parks, monuments, and seashores: New York, W.W.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Geology Report ER79-4: Porphyritic Intrusions and Related
    MANITOBA CANADA DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY AND MINES MANITOBA MINERAL RESOURCES DIVISION ECONOMIC GEOLOGY REPORT ER79-4 PORPHYRITIC INTRUSIONS AND RELATED MINERALIZATION IN THE FLIN FLON VOLCANIC BELT by D.A. BALDWIN 1980 Funding for this project was provided under the cost-shared Canada-Manitoba Non-renewable Resources Evaluation Program by the Canada Department of Energy, Mines and Resources and the Manitoba Department of Mines, Resources and Environmental Management. MANITOBA DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY AND MINES HON. DONALD W. CRAIK PAUL E. JARVIS Minister Deputy Minister MINERAL RESOURCES DIVISION IAN HAUGH Executive Director ECONOMIC GEOLOGY REPORT ER79-4 PORPHYRITIC INTRUSIONS AND RELATED MINERALIZATION IN THE FLIN FLON VOLCANIC BELT by D.A. BALDWIN 1980 LEGEND I Cliff Lake Stock 5 Elbow Lake Stock 2 Whitefish Lake Porphyry 6 Fourmile Island Intrusion 3 Alberts Lake Intrusion 7 Chisel Lake Intrusion 4 Nisto Lake Intrusion 8 Wekusko Lake Intrusion ,~ -./ - -, I \." ~herridon '" , ;. <,.... ,1 if 55°00' 55°00' c, t,:) ,J -3 , I"" . c;? '" 1[' . ::t} \'''If!? ~,/J~ /j' ., ~), F lin.~ i;\))F ' I,".!0l~' ,d ' ;)/", ' ~.;'. l ;' ~" ,r~n ;t j; (I:/,1 ,r Lake ' \\ ;\~ ' ~i'/ 'lUi':;- -'i' //{ ,'/ , ,\" ,,/,1,1 pI , .h .(,1;' '\:. (IiI' ' .. '~'4_hl i / 'Y{j,'{:" 5 2.5 a 10 15 KILOMETRES J!) "'.t3 f3,F-"\ ---- :i~ f)J~c~. V 99°30' ">/)AfhapaplJskoj¥ !ZJ Porphyritic Intrusive Rocks 54°30' ! ,1 Lake .; ... 100°30' D Felsic Volcanic Rocks FIGURE 1: Distribution of porphyritic intrusive and felsic volcanic rocks in the Flin Flon volcanic belt, TABLE OF
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Influences on Apache Trout Habitat in the White Mountains of Arizona
    GEOLOGIC INFLUENCES ON APACHE TROUT HABITAT IN THE WHITE MOUNTAINS OF ARIZONA JONATHAN W. LONG, ALVIN L. MEDINA, Rocky Mountain Research Station, U.S. Forest Service, 2500 S. Pine Knoll Dr, Flagstaff, AZ 86001; and AREGAI TECLE, Northern Arizona University, PO Box 15108, Flagstaff, AZ 86011 ABSTRACT Geologic variation has important influences on habitat quality for species of concern, but it can be difficult to evaluate due to subtle variations, complex terminology, and inadequate maps. To better understand habitat of the Apache trout (Onchorhynchus apache or O. gilae apache Miller), a threatened endemic species of the White Mountains of east- central Arizona, we reviewed existing geologic research to prepare composite geologic maps of the region at intermediate and fine scales. We projected these maps onto digital elevation models to visualize combinations of lithology and topog- raphy, or lithotopo types, in three-dimensions. Then we examined habitat studies of the Apache trout to evaluate how intermediate-scale geologic variation could influence habitat quality for the species. Analysis of data from six stream gages in the White Mountains indicates that base flows are sustained better in streams draining Mount Baldy. Felsic parent material and extensive epiclastic deposits account for greater abundance of gravels and boulders in Mount Baldy streams relative to those on adjacent mafic plateaus. Other important factors that are likely to differ between these lithotopo types include temperature, large woody debris, and water chemistry. Habitat analyses and conservation plans that do not account for geologic variation could mislead conservation efforts for the Apache trout by failing to recognize inherent differences in habitat quality and potential.
    [Show full text]
  • Part 629 – Glossary of Landform and Geologic Terms
    Title 430 – National Soil Survey Handbook Part 629 – Glossary of Landform and Geologic Terms Subpart A – General Information 629.0 Definition and Purpose This glossary provides the NCSS soil survey program, soil scientists, and natural resource specialists with landform, geologic, and related terms and their definitions to— (1) Improve soil landscape description with a standard, single source landform and geologic glossary. (2) Enhance geomorphic content and clarity of soil map unit descriptions by use of accurate, defined terms. (3) Establish consistent geomorphic term usage in soil science and the National Cooperative Soil Survey (NCSS). (4) Provide standard geomorphic definitions for databases and soil survey technical publications. (5) Train soil scientists and related professionals in soils as landscape and geomorphic entities. 629.1 Responsibilities This glossary serves as the official NCSS reference for landform, geologic, and related terms. The staff of the National Soil Survey Center, located in Lincoln, NE, is responsible for maintaining and updating this glossary. Soil Science Division staff and NCSS participants are encouraged to propose additions and changes to the glossary for use in pedon descriptions, soil map unit descriptions, and soil survey publications. The Glossary of Geology (GG, 2005) serves as a major source for many glossary terms. The American Geologic Institute (AGI) granted the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly the Soil Conservation Service) permission (in letters dated September 11, 1985, and September 22, 1993) to use existing definitions. Sources of, and modifications to, original definitions are explained immediately below. 629.2 Definitions A. Reference Codes Sources from which definitions were taken, whole or in part, are identified by a code (e.g., GG) following each definition.
    [Show full text]
  • Tectono-Metamorphic Evolution and Timing of The
    TECTONO-METAMORPHIC EVOLUTION AND TIMING OF THE MELTING PROCESSES IN THE SVECOFENNIAN TONALITE-TRONDHJEMITE MIGMATITE BELT: AN EXAMPLE FROM LUOPIOINEN, TAMPERE AREA, SOUTHERN FINLAND H. MOURI, K. KORSMÄN and H. HUHMA MOURI, H., KORSMAN, K. and HUHMA. H. 1999. Tectono-metamorphic evolution and timing of the melting processes in the Svecofennian Tonalite- Trondhjemite Migmatite Belt: An example from Luopioinen, Tampere area, southern Finland. Bulletin of the Geological Society of Finland 71, Part 1, 31- 56. The Svecofennian Orogen is in southern Finland characterized by two major migmatite belts. These are the so-called Granite Migmatite Belt, in which Kfs- rich leucosomes predominate, and the Tonalite-Trondhjemite Migmatite Belt, which is characterized by Kfs-poor leucosomes and borders the former belt in the north. The present paper deals with selected migmatitic rocks from the lat- ter belt. It is aimed to study the temporal and structural relationships of the dif- ferent leucosome generations, and to establish the pressure-temperature-time paths of this belt. The Tonalite-Trondhjemite Migmatite Belt consists mainly of migmatitic rocks with various types of synorogenic granitoids and minor mafic and ultramafic rocks. The mesosome of the migmatites consist of garnet-sillimanite-biotite-pla- gioclase-cordierite-quartz assemblages with rare K-feldspar and late andalusite. The oldest leucosomes are dominated by plagioclase and quartz, and the con- tent of K-feldspar increases in later leucosomes. Microtextural analysis in con- junction with THERMOCALC calculations and geothermometry shows that these rocks were metamorphosed at peak conditions of 700-750°C at 4-5 kbar and aH,0 = 0.4-0.7.
    [Show full text]
  • Geochemical Analysis of Beaver River Diabase in Comparison to Anorthosite Inclusions and Similar Mid- Continental Rift Diabase
    GEOCHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF BEAVER RIVER DIABASE IN COMPARISON TO ANORTHOSITE INCLUSIONS AND SIMILAR MID- CONTINENTAL RIFT DIABASE Jenna Fischer NDSU Petrology Dr. Saini- Eidukat 5/3/16 BACKGROUND MID- CONTINENT RIFT SYSTEM • Also known as Keweenawan Rift • Middle Proterozoic in age: ~ 1.1 Ga • Triple- junction rift that extends into Kansas and the lower peninsula of Michigan • Outcrops from the MRS are only seen around the Lake Superior region • Generally composed of flood basalts and intrusions • Source was a mantle plume • End of MRS could be Grenvillian orogeny (debatable) Image: www.earthscope.org Miller (1997) LAKE SUPERIOR REGION • Many intrusions in comparison to volcanic rock (60%) • Types of intrusions: Troctolitic, gabbroic, anorthositic, and granitic • Duluth Complex, North Shore Volcanic Group, and Hypabyssal Intrusions • Most hypabyssal intrusions are younger than Duluth Complex • Transitional boundary between complexes • Faults Green (1972) Miller (1997) Map: Miller and Green (2002) LAKE SUPERIOR REGION Map: Miller and Green (2002) HYPABYSSAL INTRUSIONS • Definition: a sub-volcanic rock; an intrusive igneous rock that is emplaced at medium to shallow depth within the crust between volcanic and plutonic • Largest concentration of these subvolcanic intrusions forms the Beaver Bay Complex • Whole rock compositions approximate the magma compositions • Most hypabyssal intrusions do not display igneous foliation and lack signs of differentiation • But late intrusions do! Ex. Sonju Lake, Beaver River Diabase Miller and Green (2002)
    [Show full text]
  • Rocks and Geology: General Information
    Rocks and Geology: General Information Rocks are the foundation of the earth. Rock provides the firmament beneath our oceans and seas and it covers 28% of the earth's surface that we all call home. When we travel any distance in any given direction, it is impossible not to see the tremendous variety in color, texture, and shape of the rocks around us. Rocks are composed of one or more minerals. Limestone, for example, is composed primarily of the mineral calcite. Granite can be made up of the minerals quartz, orthoclase and plagioclase feldspars, hornblende, and biotite mica. Rocks are classified by their mineral composition as well as the environment in which they were formed. There are three major classifications of rocks: igneous, sedimentary and metamorphic. A question: Which kind of rock came first? Think about it....... The following sections describe the conditions and processes that create the landscape we admire and live on here on "terra firma." IGNEOUS ROCKS The millions of tons of molten rock that poured out of the volcano Paracutin in Mexico, and from the eruption of Mount St. Helens in Washington State illustrate one of the methods of igneous rock formation. Igneous (from fire) rocks are formed when bodies of hot liquid rock called magma located beneath the earth's crust, find their way upward through the crust by way of fissures or faults. If the magma reaches the earth's surface, it forms extrusive igneous rocks or volcanic rocks. If the magma cools before it reaches the surface, it forms bodies of rock called intrusive igneous rocks or plutonic rocks.
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Porphyritic Andesite Int Metamorphism Aureole in Sel
    E-ISSN : 2541-5794 P-ISSN :2503-216X Journal of Geoscience, Engineering, Environment, and Technology Vol 5 No 2 2020 RESEARCH ARTICLE Effect of Porphyritic Andesite Intrusion on The Formation of Contact Metamorphism Aureole in Selo Gajah Hill Clastic Limestone, Bojonegoro Regency, East Java, Indonesia Tri Winarno1,*, Jenian Marin1, Wisnu Wijaya Jati1 1Department of Geological Engineering, Diponegoro University, Indonesia Corresponding author : [email protected] Telp :+62 857-4006-6835 Received: Nov 18, 2019, Accepted: Jun 25, 2020. DOI 10.25299/jgeet.2020.5.2.4098 Abstract At Selo Gajah Hill, Jari Village, Gondang Sub-district, Bojonegoro Regency, East Java there are limestone intruded by porphyritic andesite. The intrusion produces contact metamorphisms in the wall rocks. It is very interesting to study the protolith rock, facies of metamorphism and the zonation of contact metamorphism aureole. This research uses field observation method and laboratory analysis i.e. petrographic analysis. Field observation is conducted by doing geological mapping in the Bukit Selo Gajah area and rock sampling for petrographic analysis. Petrographic analysis aims to describe the texture of the rocks and the percentage of minerals, which will be used to determine the protolith rock, metamorphism facies and the determination of contact metamorphism zone. The lithology found in Mount Selo Gajah from oldest to youngest are clastic limestone with intercalation of marl, marl with intercalation of sandstone, porphyritic andesite intrusions, hornfels, and pyroclastic breccia. Metamorphic rocks on Selo Gajah Hill is the product of contact metamorphism of carbonate rock which was intruded by porphyritic andesite intrusion. The metamorphism facies found in the research area are hornblende hornfels and pyroxene hornfels with the protolith rock is carbonate rocks.
    [Show full text]
  • NI 43-101 Independent Technical Report Mount Pleasant North Zone Preliminary Assessment Mount Pleasant Property Southwestern
    330 Alison Blvd. Fredericton, New Brunswick Canada, E3C 0A9 Telephone: (506) 454-2359 Facsimile: (506) 454-2355 NI 43-101 Independent Technical Report Mount Pleasant North Zone Preliminary Assessment Mount Pleasant Property Southwestern New Brunswick, Canada Effective Date: January 22nd, 2010 FINAL REPORT PROJECT NUMBER 6526-03 REVISION: 02 Prepared By: J. Dean Thibault, P. Eng. Thibault & Associates Inc. Tim R. McKeen, P. Eng. Thibault & Associates Inc. Stephanie M. Scott, P. Eng. Thibault & Associates Inc. Trevor Boyd, P. Geo. Consultant for Adex Mining Inc. Andrew Hara, P. Eng. Hara Mining Enterprises Inc. Prepared For: Adex Mining Inc. Toronto, Ontario, Canada NI 43-101 Independent Technical Report Mount Pleasant North Zone Preliminary Assessment TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1.0 SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 Background ....................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Geology and Exploration................................................................................................... 1-2 1.3 Resource Estimate............................................................................................................ 1-2 1.4 Mining................................................................................................................................ 1-3 1.5 Processing........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]