DOCSLIB.ORG

79500NCJRS.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. National Criminal Justice Reference Service This microfiChe was produced from documents received for inclusion in the NCJRS data base. Since NCJRS cannot exercise control over the physical condition of the documents submitted, the individual frame quality will vary. The resolution chart on this frame may be used to evaluate the document quality. ..,;.--,,' " " .'-':~~-:--'-:=='-'- ~"'7-'::;c;.~"'""" '~---;:~':: ; \ ~ ". '} ,--,. ~~ri"!. __ ~':_' t=.,r 1.0 11111.2 05 .0 II 1.1 ' 111111.25 11111 1.4 JIIII1.6 , I. o , ( .~ I'oints of view or opinions stated in this document are those of the author(s) and do not represe'llt the offjcial ,...,...,.----...[)....._.".. ~ position or policies of the U. S. Department of Justice. ,[DATE FILMED" I __ t .~, ,"~"'---Y' -"',:c~~ ,~~~:~'~":~~"'~-~:,', L~~:~~r~:-:.:~.~' ~', ":.'~~- l -'\.,'", ...."'" ~;,;;- ,~.:J. " !l2j28/8Hl ~ L--~_lNati~~~II~b.t~·~fiJu~lice .... ·t:1J.'~.,·~~7~1 ., .. - ". :.1 \) United States Department of Justice -, , .' ...- .......... "'" 'i;[ ., Washington, D.C 20531 t L_,_~~,~ I~ o .~ I / • y 9.' t.:.::-·r-~~.--:-~~!"""""'" . u f ",. ~--":"--'-:"''''''''''''''''----=-----------....':.------------JI /(1 'JIi I ij f I , I I ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I Individuals managing each of tbe data sources coveCed in this report provided important information about data collection I / Data Sources on the Incidence and system problems. We thank each of these persons for their of Arson in Illinois cooperation and assistance. The Information Systems Subco.m.mit;.. I 1;..ee of the Gov:errior 's Arsol{ Advisory Board provided helpful in­ formation and assistance. '~ur thanks extends to the Subcommit­ November 4, 1977 tee's, members, eS..:..t>ecially Stephen Tapke, for their contri bu- I 0 Revised March, 1981 i;--· it. tionsT.")} J, I All SAC papers, from the first draft to final printing and By James R. Coldren, 'Jr. dissemination, are the result of coordinated efforts from the I with the assistance of Dan Lipshultz entire staff. We appreciate the contributions made by each and every staff member toward the completion of this paper. I Statistical Analysis Center CRIMINAL JUSTICE INFORMATION SYSTEMS J. David Coldren, Director (J I ILLINOIS LAW ENFORCEMENT COMMISSION Daniel H. Weil, Chairman I William Holland, Acting Executive Director ;- I I 1\ '0. U.S. Department of Justice J National Institute of Justice This document has been reproduced exactly as received from the person or organization originating it. Points of view or opinions stat7d # :1 in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily f. ' represent the official position or policies of the National Institute of .. Justice. Permission to reproduce this copyrighted material has been ~ granted by • • "{,'I - Illinois Law Enforcement Comm1ss1on ."".r-~'--------------- to the National Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS). ,"'.i ;1L F /J t .' ,If {) Further reproduction outside of the NCJRS system requires permis­ l) c' '\ sion of the copyright owner. ... ~. <, . 11 . " i~ I . J >i I ." ;w"lI'i.1IIiiiU~~~'" U ur$:I~~lijl!li.Ii/lMiil!i_~._ t,- ,.. ~,,-, .. , .. , ' - .. '\'~ \.. , / iii ill . II £4)11.. I 1& .. Jd.liUi it!2i!iJI kt iU till'" • < .. INTRODUCTION TABLE OF CONTENTS This is a revi~ed edition of a St~~istical Analysis Center Page (SAC) report ~ublished in November of 1977: "Data Sources on the Acknowledgments . ~ . .. i Inoidence of Arson in Illinois." In the three years since the Introduction • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ~ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• 1 publication of that paper advances have been made in arson in­ Data Sources , ' • e· • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 5 formatforrreporting systems at the state level and nationwide. Illinois Uniform Crime Reports ..•...... ~ ...••••••••.•. 5 The most significant stimulus for these advances has been the Chicago Police Department Bomb and Arson Sectiqn •••... 13 recognition by law enforcement officials and citizens that arson Illinois Courts D~ta .....•.....•........•••... ~ ••.••.. 16 is a serious ~roblem requiring concerted efforts toward its pre­ Illinois Dep~rtment of Corrections ....••..•.•.••.••... 19 vention. Significant, also, was the legislation passed by Con­ Office of the State Fire Marshal ....•.••........••.... 22 gress in October. of 1978 mandating that arson be included as an Metropolitan Chioago Loss Burea~ ~ .... • • 0 • • • • • • • • 0 • • • • • 28 Index offense in the Federal Bureau of Investigation's Uniform 1 Summary and Conclusions ............... II ••••••••••••••••••• 30 Crime Reporting Program. The availability Of' arson data in Appendices • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••••••••••• ~ •••••• eo. • • •• 3.1 Illinois and nationwide has changed in recent years due to these Appendix A: Summary Table of Illinois Arson Data '--I and other developments. Thii paper makes these changes known to Sources . • . • . • • . • . • • . .. 3 1 L users of Illinois criminal justice data. Appendix B: Statistical Analysis Center - Illinois Uniform Crime Reports (SAC-IUCR) 0 Illinois Law concerning arson has changed in recent years. Data Elements . • • .. • . .. 33 Until 1973, three arson offenses were defined by the Criminal (.{ppendix C: Map Detailing the Illinois Circuit 11 Code of Illinois: ,I L\'/ \ Court Boundaries •..••.••........••..••.•..• 38 Appendix D: Chief Judges and Circuit Clerks of - arson; [( - possession of explosive or incendiary devices; Court in the Illinois Courts .. ~~ .•...•.•.•. 40 ; ,".: and ~ / Appendix E: Corrections Information System~ r':j attempt~d arson "",- II1 , ~;~ ("~IS) Data Elements ..........••••..••••••. 47 ~J." . ' In October of 1977, Illinois law de~~ned a new arson offense: AppendixF: H P~operty Insurance Loss Register aggravated arson. The legal defini~[on of the four arson offens­ ,(P'ILR) Data Elements •..•.•....•.••..•••...• 50 [J es presently recognized by Illinois'\J."e.!'l~A Illinois Revised, Stat­ Appendix G: Nationa~ Fire Incident Reporting utes, 1979, Chapter 38, Articre 20, Sections 20-1 et.seq., and System (NFIRS) Data Elements ..•••• r ••••••• 53 <J )] 8-4) are given below. Glossa~y ••••••••• _................ "~a ••••••••••••••••• ". • • • • • •• 59 n 1L I '> 1 The Index offenses (prior to this law) \1 were Murder and ~,I Non-negligent manslaughter, Forcible Rape, Robbery, Aggra­ 0 vated Assault, Burglary, Larceny-Theft, and Motor Vehicle (--\ Theft (FBI, Crime in the U.S. 1978, p. 2). I 1 ~I f\L_.i i, ' r,",J",' 1 L ,\, .- / ... ~. ,~ ... -.-.. "-. ~.Jl.~ ..eect "'-------------------_.. _.. 2 m m 3 '.>. Arson m m reasonably should kno~ t~at one or more persons are A person commits arson when, by means of fire or pre~ent therein 6r (2) any person s~ffers ~reat bod­ explosive, he knowingly: I ,I ily harm, or permanent disability or disfigurement as a result of the fire or explosion or (3) a fire­ (a) Damages any real p~operty, or any personal I J ma~ or policeman who 'is present at the scene acting property having a value of $150 or more, of another in the line of duiy, is injured as a result of the without his consent; or i I fire or explosion. Attempted Arson (b) With intent to defraud an insurer, damages any or any property having a value I I ~~operty pe~sonal 0 of $150 or more. A person commits an attempt when, with intent to I m commit a specific offense (e.g. arson), he does any Property "of another" means a building or other act which constitutes a substantial step toward the property, whether real or personal, in which a per­ I m" commission of that offense. son other than the offender has an interes~ which the offender has no authority to defeat or impair, I m Arson is a crime that poses difficult reporting problems. even though the offen der· may a 1 so h a ve an ·.L~nterest Any single arson inCident can involve as many as three agencies in the building or property. j that collect arson data. It will usually involve at least one I of them, unless' the. crime is never detected.or reported, in Possession of Explosive or Incendiary Devices which case no data are collected. The three agencies are (1) I :1 fire departments, (2) police departments, and (3) insurance A person commits the offense of possession of agencies. Each of these agencie$ collects and reports different explosives or Incen" d"lary dev'"ces_ l"n vl"olation of I I kinds of information about arson, and although some overlap this Section when he possesses, manufactures or takes place, an accurate description of the arson problem in transports any explosive compound, timing or deton­ IllinOis would be unobtainable without considering these three I I sources. ating device for use with any explosive compound or incendiary device anq either intends to use such .~ explosive or device to commit any offense or knows I This paper describes six major sources of data on arson in Illinois; that another intends to use such explosive or de­ vice to commit a felony. I D <, :' IllinOis Uniform Crime Reports; r-1 Aggravated Arson 1 Chicago Police Department Bomb and Arson Unit; I I:.,.) IllinOis Courts; - IllinOis Department of Corrections; ,--:) Office, of the State Fire Marshal; and A person commit;'a~gravated arson ~hen by means L - Metropolitan Cbicago Loss Bureau. I _oJ of fire pr explosive he knowinglY'd~mages1 partially or totally, any build~ng or structure, including any For each source, this report provides information concerning I rJ-....: adjacent building or
Recommended publications
  • Assessment and Appeal Information Directory

    Assessment and Appeal Information Directory

    ASSESSMENT AND APPEAL INFORMATION DIRECTORY Forward This publication is designed as a reference tool for the taxpayer who may have only a basic understanding of the property tax assessment and appeal processes in the State of Illinois. Taxpayers should refer to the county where their property is located as a starting point for answers to assessment and appeal questions. The functions of various county officials are generally the same in each county. Due to occasional changes in addresses and telephone numbers throughout the state's 102 counties, it is almost impossible to guarantee complete accuracy at all times. However, rest assured that the staff of the Property Tax Appeal Board has made every effort to verify the information contained in the booklet. To that end, we wish to acknowledge the sincere assistance received from county officials statewide. It was their cooperation and support that has made the Assessment and Appeal Information Directory possible. This publication is available at the Property Tax Appeal Board offices in Springfield and Des Plaines. If you notice any omissions or errors, please let us know immediately and we will correct our records. Table of Contents • INTRODUCTION o County Government o Supervisor of Assessments (County Assessor) o Board of Review o County Clerk o Treasurer (Collector) o Clerk of the Circuit Court o State’s Attorney o Property Tax Appeal Board o Department of Revenue • COUNTY LISTINGS (in alphabetical order) Introduction This section is intended as a basic overview of the various county and state offices and the various duties of the officials within the assessment cycle.
  • 2020 Annual Report Administrative Summary

    2020 Annual Report Administrative Summary

    ILLINOIS COURTS 2020ANNUAL REPORT THE JUSTICES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS Left to Right: Justice David K. Overstreet, Justice P. Scott Neville, Jr., Justice Rita B. Garman, Chief Justice Anne M. Burke, Justice Mary Jane Theis, Justice Michael J. Burke, Justice Robert L. Carter TABLE OF CONTENTS 4 Letter of Transmittal 5 A Message from the Chief Justice 8 Strategic Agenda 11 Year in Review 16 Justices of the Supreme Court 19 Supreme Court Support Staff 21 Annual Report to the General Assembly 29 Supreme Court Committees 31 State and Local Funding for the Courts 38 Appellate Courts 50 Circuit Courts 77 Administrative Office 90 Statistical Summaries and Trends LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL On behalf of the in civil matters and for remote proceedings Court Services Division and the Office of Administrative Office in adult criminal matters. In addition Communications and Public Information, of the Illinois Courts to its response to the pandemic, other for the countless hours that are invested in (AOIC), I am pleased accomplishments in 2020 included release the preparation of this Report. The Annual to present the 2020 of a statement on racial justice and hiring of Report reflects the efforts and dedication of Annual Report of a Chief Diversity & Inclusion Officer for the the individuals who comprise our judiciary, the Illinois Courts. judicial branch; launch of a volunteer pro bono non-judicial staff and justice stakeholders who The Report contains program to decrease the criminal appeals strive to advance fair, efficient, and affordable a summary of the backlog; and expansion of the Remote Access justice to all in Illinois.
  • The Illinois Supreme Court Has Struck Down State Laws That Slap Fees On

    The Illinois Supreme Court Has Struck Down State Laws That Slap Fees On

    6/30/2021 IL Supreme Court: Court foreclosure filing fees are illegal tax to support state 'neighborhood beautification plan' | Cook County Record Illinois Supreme Court | Illinoiscourts.gov The Illinois Supreme Court has struck down state laws that slap fees on those bringing mortgage foreclosure actions, saying the $50 filing fee represents an attempt by the state to use the court system to raise money to administer a state social welfare program intended to combat neighborhood blight and reduce future home foreclosures. On June 17, the state high court declared unconstitutional sections of two laws, a revision of the Illinois Code of Civil Procedure, which governs operations at Illinois’ state courts, and sections of the Illinois Housing Development Act. The portions of those laws together created a fee system that imposed $50 fees on people bringing foreclosure actions in Illinois circuit courts, and then would dedicate that revenue to support a range of government programs and agencies. Under the revised IHDA provisions, the money would be divided between housing counseling agencies to prevent foreclosures in Chicago and elsewhere, and would be paid to Cook County, the city of Chicago and county and municipal governments in other counties in Chicago’s suburbs, ostensibly to cover the expenses of remedying and maintaining abandoned residential properties, to Daniel K. Cray | crayhuber.com combat blight caused by home foreclosures. That fee system and related laws were challenged by plaintiffs Reuben D. Walker and M. Steven Diamond in Will County court, who asserted the fees represented an unconstitutional infringement on their right of access to the court.
  • Illinois Courts 2019 Annual Report

    Illinois Courts 2019 Annual Report

    ILLINOIS COURTS 2019ANNUAL REPORT THE JUSTICES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS Left to Right: Justice Mary Jane Theis, Justice Rita B. Garman, Justice Robert R. Thomas, Chief Justice Anne M. Burke, Justice Thomas L. Kilbride, Justice Lloyd A. Karmeier, Justice P. Scott Neville, Jr. TABLE OF CONTENTS 4 Letter of Transmittal 5 A Message from the Chief Justice 8 Strategic Agenda 11 Year in Review 16 Justices of the Supreme Court 19 Supreme Court Support Staff 21 Annual Report to the General Assembly 28 Supreme Court Committees 30 State and Local Funding for the Courts 37 Appellate Courts 49 Circuit Courts 76 Administrative Office 89 Statistical Summaries and Trends LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL On behalf of the of our court system and current information tool in understanding the work and function Administrative on the judicial officers and employees who of our state’s justice system. I invite you to Office of the Illinois provide the people of Illinois with a court explore the Illinois Supreme Court’s website Courts (AOIC), I am system that fairly and impartially administers at www.illinoiscourts.gov for the most current pleased to offer justice and efficiently resolves disputes. information concerning the Illinois courts the 2019 Annual The Report also contains court data charts and court partners who comprise the judicial Report of the Illinois regarding the more frequently requested/ branch of government. Courts. The Report viewed statistics from the Supreme, Appellate contains a summary and Circuit Courts. Additional court data Sincerely, of the day-to-day from each appellate district, circuit and operations of the county is available at www.illinoiscourts.gov/ Supreme, Appellate and Circuit Courts, and SupremeCourt/AnnReport.asp.

  • The Case for Repudiating and Replacing Illinois' Void Sentence

    CLASSEN.CORRECTED.PAGES_457-458.462.DOC 4/11/2011 3:43:40 PM Filling the Void: The Case for Repudiating and Replacing Illinois’ Void Sentence Rule Kristopher N. Classen* Honorable Jack O’Malley** During the summer of 2010, the Illinois Supreme Court repeated the “well settled” rule “that a [criminal] sentence that is in conflict with statutory guidelines is void and may be challenged at any time.”1 The predominant reason a judgment is considered void under Illinois law is that “it was entered by a court that lacked jurisdiction of the parties or the subject matter or that lacked the inherent power2 to make or enter the particular order involved.”3 Thus, this void sentence rule presumes * Mr. Classen is a judicial law clerk for Justice Thomas E. Hoffman of the Illinois Appellate Court First District, an Affiliate Professor of Law at Northern Illinois University College of Law, and a former law clerk for Justice O’Malley. He graduated cum laude from the University of Illinois College of Law. ** Justice O’Malley served on the Illinois Appellate Court Second District from 2000 to 2010. Prior to his election to the bench, Justice O’Malley was twice elected as Cook County State’s Attorney. He graduated from the University of Chicago Law School as an Edwin F. Mandel Fellow and attended Cornell University Law School as a Charles Evans Hughes Scholar. The authors owe thanks to Laura E. Rodey for her unrelenting support and assistance, and to Illinois Appellate Court Second District Research Director Jeffrey H. Kaplan for his characteristically insightful suggestions.
  • Judge Thaddeus L. Wilson

    Judge Thaddeus L. Wilson

    JUDGE THADDEUS L. WILSON Circuit Court of Cook County Criminal Division BIOGRAPHY Judge Thaddeus L. Wilson was appointed to the bench by the Illinois Supreme Court and sworn as a judge of the Circuit Court of Cook County on August 31, 2007 and elected November 2, 2010. He is currently a supervising judge assigned to the Criminal Division where he hears felony cases. Judge Wilson is a native of South Carolina. During his senior year of high school, he served as a youth advisor to then South Carolina governor Richard W. Riley. In 1989, he received his Bachelor of Business Administration Degree from the University of Notre Dame in Management of Information Systems with a double major in Philosophy. Upon graduating from Notre Dame, he moved to Chicago, Illinois to work as a computer programmer/systems analyst for Joseph T. Ryerson & Son. Judge Wilson received his law degree from Northern Illinois University College of Law in 1994. Prior to his appointment to the bench, Judge Wilson was the managing attorney of the Law Office of Brookins & Wilson (A Partnership of Professional Corporations). He practiced in the areas of personal injury, criminal defense, general civil litigation, civil rights/police misconduct, bankruptcy, foreclosure, and election law. As part of his multifaceted litigation practice, he represented corporations, banks, municipalities, insurance companies and individuals. He also served as an arbitrator with the Circuit Court of Cook County Mandatory Arbitration Program and as a hearing officer for the Chicago Board of Elections. He has argued cases before the Illinois Appellate Court and the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals.
  • Access to Justice Overview 2020 ILLINOIS SUPREME COURT COMMISSION on ACCESS to JUSTICE ACCESS to JUSTICE OVERVIEW 2020

    Access to Justice Overview 2020 ILLINOIS SUPREME COURT COMMISSION on ACCESS to JUSTICE ACCESS to JUSTICE OVERVIEW 2020

    Illinois Supreme Court Commission on Access to Justice Statewide Listening Tours Access to Justice Overview 2020 ILLINOIS SUPREME COURT COMMISSION ON ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACCESS TO JUSTICE OVERVIEW 2020 December 30, 2019 Dear Chief Justice Burke, This packet is intended to provide you with an overview of the work of the Illinois Supreme Court Commission Access to Justice in advance of your listening tours. The packet provides a brief summary of access to justice issues, and specific details about established programs that are designed to reduce barriers litigants may face in trying to access the court system. Of all the ATJ Commission’s projects, we chose to highlight only the programs that have a specific, tangible resource that may be of interest and use to the public or court stakeholders. The Illinois Supreme Court created the ATJ Commission in 2012 to enhance access to justice efforts, with a specific direction to complement existing efforts and to coordinate and collaborate with other civil legal aid funders and service providers. Its missions statement reads: to promote, facilitate, and enhance access to justice with an emphasis on access to the Illinois civil courts and administrative agencies for all people, particularly the poor and vulnerable. There are 11 Commissioners which represent all five appellate districts and Justice Rochford has served as chair since 2015. The ATJ Commission is staffed by the Access to Justice Division at the Administrative Office of the Illinois Courts and the Division has successfully integrated much of the ATJ Commission’s work into judicial branch operations and coordinates with other divisions of the AOIC to promote meaningful access to justice.
  • Solid Waste Planning & Recycling Appendices K, L & M

    Solid Waste Planning & Recycling Appendices K, L & M

    Solid Waste Planning & Recycling Appendices K, L & M Appendix K Appendix I: Adoption Dates and Updates for Solid Waste Management Plans Appendix I Contact List for Solid Waste Planning and Recycling Alphabetic by County County Organization Contact Phone Adams Adams County Health Department Mr. Leonard Schnellbecker 217-222-8440 Ext. 132 Alexander Southern Five Regional Planning Commission Ms. Susan Snow 618-634-2284 Bond Bond County Health Department Ms. Crystal Lingley 618-664-1442 Ext. 149 Boone Boone County Government Mr. Kenneth Terrinoni 815-547-4770 Brown Two Rivers Regional Council of Public Officials Ms. Victoria Hayden 217-224-8171 Ext. 309 Bureau Bureau County Courthouse Ms. Kristine Donarski 815-875-2077 Calhoun Calhoun County Mr. Lester Sontag 618-576-2589 Carroll JoDaviess/Carroll County Solid Waste Agency Mr. Paul Hartman 815-273-2251 Cass Two Rivers Regional Council of Public Officials Ms. Victoria Hayden 217-224-8171 Ext. 309 Champaign Champaign County Administrator's Office Ms. Deb Busey 217-384-3776 or 3720 Christian Christian Co. Solid Waste Management Dept. Mr. Joe Stepping 217-287-2334 Clark Clark County Health Department Mr. Mike Henry 217-382-4207 Clay Clay County Health Department Mr. Bill Jay Bruce 618-662-4406 Clinton Clinton County Health Department Mr. Mike McMillan 618-594-2723 Coles Coles Co. Reg. Planning and Devel. Commission Mr. Jeff Lahr 217-348-0521 Cook Cook Co. Dept. of Environmental Control Mr. Raymond Akers Jr. 312-603-8217 Chicago Department of Environment Ms. Erin Keane 312-744-5918 South Suburban Mayors and Managers Assoc. Ms. Karen Hoffschmidt 708-206-1155 Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County Mr.
  • A Study of the Illinois Supreme Court*

    A Study of the Illinois Supreme Court*

    A STUDY OF THE ILLINOIS SUPREME COURT* OR over twenty-five years no systematic evaluation of the work and organization of the Illinois Supreme Court has been published. The last such study was made in i92o when the judiciary received its share of attention at the time of the efforts to adopt a new constitu- tion.' Although issues of constitutional reform are once again being hotly debated, no such justification should be needed to examine the work of the Illinois Supreme Court. Rather, it is surprising that in the intervening years so little attention has been given to that court which is potentially the court of last resort for most of the. litigation arising in Illinois. Two major areas of research have furnished the data for this study. Within the first-the written opinions of the Court for the year 1946-47- an attempt has been made to discover the bases of the Court's decisions and to investigate major developments in the substantive law. To this end, all cases for which opinions were handed down during the terms September 1946 through May 19472 have been studied. Those were se- lected for discussion which either made a significant addition to the law of Illinois or which indicated the techniques of the Court in reaching de- cisions and writing opinions. An attempt has also been made to investigate the workings of the Court as an institution, including not only those pro- cedures prescribed in the Constitution and by statute, but also rules of practice and the measures of convenience adopted by the justices.
  • Illinois Military Museums & Veterans Memorials

    Illinois Military Museums & Veterans Memorials

    ILLINOIS enjoyillinois.com i It is for us the living, rather, to be dedicated here to the unfinished work which they who fought here have thus far nobly advanced. Abraham Lincoln Illinois State Veterans Memorials are located in Oak Ridge Cemetery in Springfield. The Middle East Conflicts Wall Memorial is situated along the Illinois River in Marseilles. Images (clockwise from top left): World War II Illinois Veterans Memorial, Illinois Vietnam Veterans Memorial (Vietnam Veterans Annual Vigil), World War I Illinois Veterans Memorial, Lincoln Tomb State Historic Site (Illinois Department of Natural Resources), Illinois Korean War Memorial, Middle East Conflicts Wall Memorial, Lincoln Tomb State Historic Site (Illinois Office of Tourism), Illinois Purple Heart Memorial Every effort was made to ensure the accuracy of information in this guide. Please call ahead to verify or visit enjoyillinois.com for the most up-to-date information. This project was partially funded by a grant from the Illinois Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity/Office of Tourism. 12/2019 10,000 What’s Inside 2 Honoring Veterans Annual events for veterans and for celebrating veterans Honor Flight Network 3 Connecting veterans with their memorials 4 Historic Forts Experience history up close at recreated forts and historic sites 6 Remembering the Fallen National and state cemeteries provide solemn places for reflection is proud to be home to more than 725,000 8 Veterans Memorials veterans and three active military bases. Cities and towns across the state honor Illinois We are forever indebted to Illinois’ service members and their veterans through memorials, monuments, and equipment displays families for their courage and sacrifice.
  • United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

    United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

    In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 11-3197 KEITH DOOKERAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COUNTY OF COOK, ILLINOIS, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. No. 11 C 2802—Joan B. Gottschall, Judge. ARGUED MARCH 28, 2012—DECIDED MAY 3, 2013 Before MANION, SYKES, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. SYKES, Circuit Judge. Dr. Keith Dookeran was hired by John H. Stroger Hospital of Cook County in 2000 subject to biennial reappointment. In his 2004 applica- tion for reappointment, Dookeran disclosed for the first time that Mercy Hospital, his previous employer, had reprimanded him for creating a hostile work environ- ment. This disclosure triggered an investigation and peer review by Stroger Hospital’s medical staff. An admin- 2 No. 11-3197 istrative committee eventually revoked Dookeran’s staff privileges, and the Cook County Board formally denied his reappointment application. Dookeran sought judicial review by common-law writ of certiorari in Cook County Circuit Court. The circuit court ruled in his favor, but the Illinois Appellate Court reversed and reinstated the denial of reappointment, and the Illinois Supreme Court denied leave to appeal. While these proceedings were ongoing in the Illinois courts, Dookeran filed charges of employment discrimination with the Illinois Department of Human Rights (“IDHR”) and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) alleging that his reapplication was denied based on his race and national origin and also in retalia- tion for an earlier charge he had filed with the EEOC. After a long delay, Dookeran received a right-to-sue letter from the EEOC and brought this suit in federal court against Cook County alleging discrimination and retaliation in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.
  • Jenner & Block Civil Practice Guide-COVID-19 Update

    Jenner & Block Civil Practice Guide-COVID-19 Update

    COVID-19 COMPANION GUIDE TO THE ILLINOIS CIVIL PRACTICE GUIDE MAY 2021 Andrew W. Vail, Kevin J. Murphy, Elpitha B. Lambros, Henry A. Leaman INTRODUCTION The COVID-19 pandemic has had an enormous impact on civil litigation in Illinois. Since March 2020, the Governor of Illinois and Illinois courts of all levels have implemented numerous orders that affect nearly all facets of civil litigation. As the demands of the pandemic have changed, these orders have, in many instances, been revised or superseded by new orders. As a result, Illinois civil litigation is presently governed by a complex patchwork of orders and rules that continue to change on a regular basis. It is important for all Illinois practitioners both to familiarize themselves with these orders and rules and to stay abreast of updates to the orders and rules. Accordingly, as a supplement to the 2021 edition of the Illinois Civil Practice Guide, we are including this “COVID-19 Companion Guide” that highlights some of the most significant changes to Illinois civil practice that have been implemented in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Given the many orders governing different courts around the State, and the evolving nature of these orders, the COVID-19 Update is not intended to be all encompassing. All attorneys should independently review and familiarize themselves with all relevant orders and rules and monitor updates to those orders and rules. Nevertheless, we hope that you find the COVID-19 Update to be a helpful tool in navigating Illinois civil litigation during the pandemic. This Guide was last updated in April 2021, and the authors hope to update it periodically as the situation develops.