Balance: Art and Nature
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Balance: Art and Nature To all artists who believe in freedom Copyright © 2014 John K. Grande No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form, by any means electronic or mechanical including photocopying and recording, or by any information storage or retrieval system— without written permission from the author, or, in the case of photocopying or other reprographic copying, a license from the Canadian Reprography Collective, with the exception of brief passages quoted by a reviewer in a newspaper or magazine. National Library of Canada Cataloguing in Publication Data Grande, John K. Balance: Art and Nature / John K Grande. Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. Creation (Literary, artistic, etc.) 2. Art Modem-20th century-Economic aspects. 3. Art, Modem-20th century-Social aspects. 4. Artists-Psychology. 5. Nature (Aesthetics) E-Book ISBN 978-0-9938036-0-4 Caver design: Rasa Paoilams. Cover Photo: Andy Goldsworthy, Arizona, 1989, courtesy the artist Contents Introduction 1. Waiting for a Cultural Break Between the Commercials 2. Like A Bird with No Feet 3. Nature is the Art of which We are a Part 4. Ephemeral Inspiration/Concrete History 5. Stolen Subjects & Exhausted Spirits 6. Duelling with Dualism – Descartes, Rodin, Picasso, Suchamp et al 7. Maleness & Femaleness in Art 8. Andy Goldsworthy – Ephemeral Integration 9. Outside, History, Inside, Nature 10. Native Art is Contemporary Art 11. Prelude or Requiem 12. Solid State Angels – Contemporary Japanese Art 13. Anish Kapoor – Presence or Absence? 14. Armand Vaillanocurt – The Eye & The Storm 15. James Carl’s Euphemistic Reality 16. Bill Reid & the Spirit of the Haida Gawaii 17. AmericanaNacirema – The Other Side of the American Dream - Duane Hanson 18. Carl Beam - Dissolving Time 19. Dmitri Kaminker’s Mythical Menagerie 20. Antony Gormley Being a Landscape 21. Which Public? Whose Art? 22. Earth Sensitive 23. The Nuclear Map – Bob Del Tredici 24. Transitions - Trois Rivieres Praise for John K. Grande "Grande defines a future where small-scale societies exist in harmony with their individual bio-regions, and he finds art that articulates this vision. His writing is clear and blessedly free of postmodern jargon." - Public Art Review "Demonstrates that art criticism doesn't have to give readers a headache. His grasp of details—both artistic and political—makes this book convincing, and interesting." - Books In Canada "One doesn't have to agree with everything Grande writes in order to welcome this book's arrival." - Globe and Mail "Ideas are plentiful...Grande is clearly versed and passionate about nature's role in art." - Quill & Quire "Fascinating reading...Grande has assembled an enormous breadth of material and judged it from the perspective of a well-informed heart." - Montreal Gazette "Grande makes an important statement. Despite the various causes artists embrace we still have one common cause: to preserve the earth." -McGill Daily "Reinvigorates my desire to consider contemporary art as a vital form of expression and encourages the reader to see that art in relation to daily life and society at large." - Canadian Forum "Engaging, provocative and thoughtful...Grande cares passionately about art, the environment, and the relationship between them." —Compass also by John K. Grande INTERTWINING: Artists, Landscape, Issues, Technology Over forty essays and reviews around the themes of artists, landscape, issues, and technology. Topics include the effects of the Internet on museums and education; artists working in and around a nature park; agriculture as art; the artists' response to breast cancer; to animal rights; to violence and children's toys; to art and illness. "Grande's essays have literary merit and insight that remain vital. When critics do their work well, they increase their readers' understanding of art." — Hour "A readable, engaging book... Grande has taken contemporary art out of the exclusive domain of the art world demi-gods and given it back to anyone who dips into this collection." - Canadian Forum 320 pages, photographs, index Paperback ISBN: 1-55164-110-0 $24.99 Hardcover ISBN: 1-55164-111-9 $53.99 Introduction "Which nature? Whose art?" reads the brochure from the Tranekaer International Art and Nature Centre (TICKON). Located on the island of Langeland in Denmark, TICKON is a recently established testing ground for an art dedicated to creating a new relationship be- tween humanity and nature. For artists working towards the betterment of "a world that is vulnerable in some absolute sense,"' this relationship is crucial. .For centuries we have assumed that history and art are a series of progressions inimically tied to the economic progress of Western civilization. Our cultural conception of nature, like environmental art itself, has defined nature as "aesthetic real estate" — mere matter to be manipulated, transposed and reformed in order to affirm our superiority over nature. Duchamp once said; "Man invented art. It wouldn't exist without him. Art has no biological source. Ifs addressed to a taste,"^ yet who could now deny that art has always been a part of nature? Art is as necessary to society as the sun is to nature, for it sheds light, to paraphrase Gauguin, on who we are, where we come from and where we are going. It is a point many of today's assemblage artists should remember. By appropriating and manipulating the flotsam and jetsam of industrial society in new and ingenious ways, artists such as Tony Cragg, Bill Woodrow, David Mach and Richard Deacon allude to the malaise of overproduction and consumption. A seemingly reflexive response to utilitarianism and resource exploitation run amok, their work does nothing to reconnect us with nature: it merely reaffirms the syntax of the industrial product. David Mach's massive installations — Ploughman's Lunch, exhibited at the Milton Keynes Shopping Centre in England, and The Art that Came Apart, exhibited at the Musee d'art contemporain in Montreal — are the most extreme examples. A kind of temporary per- formance sculpture, these works were literally built up out of tons of magazines and various consumer products including television sets, a piano, a bulldozer, cars, and a canoe to name but some of the items. This eco-Pop brand of postconsumer art may look more contentious than a Magdalena Abakanowicz or Shigeo Toya, but the effect is hardly as profound or lasting. The inner ear of these altered product statements will always be their materials' original, natural context. Ashley Bickerton deals with these problematic issues by encasing in- dustrial waste, seed pods, trash, dried grasses and earth or, as in a David Mach. The Art that Came Apart (detail), 1989.Exhibited at the Musee d'art contemporain de Montreal, Montreal. Photo by Ron Diamond. Photo courtesy of the artist. work titled Minimalism's Evil Orthodoxy Monoculture's Totalitarian Esthetic #1 (1989), by juxtaposing soil and crop samples from South America, Asia and Africa. Another Bickerton piece approached the question as it relates specifically to artist's materials: two structurally designed boxes had tiny squares of cadmium yellow and cadmium red painted within them — the toxic components in cadmium were listed on the boxes' sides. At the other end of the spectrum, responding directly to various aspects of climate, geology, vegetation, even other life forms, today's most prominent environmental artists — David Nash, Karen McKoy, Andy Goldsworthy, Giuliano Mauri, Jane Balsgaard, Lars Viks and Nils-Udo among others — express these concerns by creating natural constructions: installing plantings, welding ice assemblages, making dandelion chains, grafting tree forms, arranging patterns of berries and leaves in idyllic backwoods settings far from the hue and cry of the urban centres where most of us live. But the question arises, while these works may present themselves as ecologically sensitized, how socially involved is this new vision? It has been a long time since we idealized landscapes and saw nature as a seemingly inexhaustible reserve as the Romantics did when the first factory smokestacks went up. As environmental artists opposed to the alienation and confused reality of our cities attempt to rediscover nature on its own terms, they proffer a vision of art as a detail of the landscape. Disconnected from the root cause of environmental devastation — a burgeoning civilization and economy based on profit and competition — this brand of environmental art is as exclusive in its purist vision as formalist art. In one of her "mock monuments" titled Excess Volatility,]enlea Zempel responded to these issues from within the urban situation. Zempel dragged a burned out, abandoned Volkswagen bug into Battery Park and clothed it in tree clippings and cuttings donated by the park management service, sheathing its exterior with a skin of pine needles and painting its interior a bright orange. As Zempel comments; “To me these stripped down, burnt out wrecks are like animal carcasses picked clean by urban predators. I wanted to reclaim one of those vehicles, exaggerate its animalness using another kind of debris from nature rather than culture." Ephemeral is now fashionable. We attribute ethical values to works of art based on their supposed permanence or impermanence Jerilea Zempel. Excess Volatility, 1989. Abandoned Volkswagen and tree branches. Battery Park. New York. Photo courtesy of the artist. without considering that human civilization has always been a product of the culture of nature. Goldsworthy inverts the order, finding design as a quality of nature. Though it may seem too simplistic and socially uninvolved, it is an art that achieves a balance between ethics and aesthetics. His works promote an ecological consciousness as premeditated as Duchamp's once was — a land art in microcosm where the subject has been preselected and nature is considered within a purist context. Yet such designing with nature is a primordial or Jungian social act because it recognizes our own unconscious origins in the forms that exist in nature's holistic state.